Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lcgwf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T17:12:49.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A short historical review of SCNP with special reference to the UKU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2013

Per Bech  and
Thomas A. Ban
Per Bech*
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark
Thomas A. Ban
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
*
Per Bech, Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark. Tel.: +45 38 64 30 98; Fax: +45 48 26 38 77; E-mail: Per.bech@regionh.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To give a review of the history of SCNP since the first meeting in 1960 with specific focus on UKU.

Methods

Consulting the appropriate minutes from the meetings.

Results

One of the major goals of the SCNP was the standardization of clinical trials with psychotropic drugs. In 1969, the SCNP established a Committee for Clinical Investigations (UKU) with the representation of clinical investigators and the drug industry; moreover, during the 1970s and ’80s, the UKU initiated clinical trialsand contributed to the methodology of clinical investigations with psychotropic drugs. With the decrease in governmental funding and increasing influence of the US Food and Drug Administration on themethodology of clinical investigations around the world in the 1990s, the UKU was dissolved. The changes had a detrimental effect on the developments on the methodology of clinical investigations, and the lack of clinical feedback led to an impasse in psychotropic drug development with some pharmaceutical companies abandoning research in the central nervous system area.

Conclusion

It is suggested that a revival of UKU to provide a platform for dialogue among government, industry, and academia could help break the impasse.

Keywords

clinical methodologycommittee for clinical investigatorspsychotropic drug developmentSCNPstandardisation of clinical trialsUKU.

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 4 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Ravn, J. First Scandinavian psychopharmacological meeting. Nordic J Psychiatry 1961;15:1–2.Google Scholar
2.Ravn, J. Second Scandinavian psychopharmacological meeting. Nord J Psychiatry 1962;16:1–3.Google Scholar
3.Lingjaerde, O. Standardized instruments used in the assessment of depression in Scandinavian countries. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA, editors. Assessment of Depression. Berlin: Springer, 1986, p. 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lingjaerde, O, Edlund, AH, Gormsen, CAet al. The effects of lithium carbonate in combination with tricyclic antidepressants in endogenous depression. A double-blind, multicenter trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1974;50:233–242.Google Scholar
5.Bech, P, Ahlfors, UG, Dencker, SJ, Elgen, K, Lingjaerde, O. The UKU side effects scale – a scale for the registration of unwanted effects of psychotropics (UKU's bivirkningsskala – skala til registrering af uønskede virkninger af psykofarmaka). Nord J Psychiatry 1986;40:147–158.Google Scholar
6.Lingjaerde, O, Ahlfors, UG, Bech, P, Dencker, SJ, Elgen, K. The UKU side effect rating scale. A new comprehensive rating scale for psychotropic drugs and a cross-sectional study of side effects in neuroleptic-treated patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1987;334:1–100.Google Scholar
7.Bech, P, Malt, UF, Dencker, SJet al. Scales for Assessment of Diagnosis and Severity of Mental Disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scand 1993;87(Suppl. 372):1–87.Google Scholar
8.Bech, P, Trimble, MR, Gastpar, Met al. The current scope of psychopharmacological research in Europe. Nord J Psychiatry 1984;38(Suppl. 10):33–48.Google Scholar
9.Healy, D. Drugs & industry. In: Ban TA, Healy D, Shorter E, editors. The Rise of Psychopharmacology & the Story of the CINP. Budapest: Animula, 1998, p. 51–55.Google Scholar
10.Bech, P. Issues of concern in the standardization and harmonization of psychotropic drug trials in Europe. Eur Psychiatry 1994;9:113–114.Google Scholar
11.Strömgren, E. Current status of psychiatric research in Denmark. Psychiatrie & Psychobiologie 1987;11:128–133.Google Scholar
12.Fink, M. A clinician–researcher and ECDEU 1959–1980. In: Ban TA, Healy D, Shorter E, editors. The Triumph of Psychopharmacology the Story of CINP. Budapest: Animula, 2000, p. 82–92.Google Scholar
13.Kramer, PD. Against Depression. New York: Viking Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar
14.Bech, P, Gex-Fabry, M, Aubry, JM, Favre, S, Bertschy, G. Olanzapine plasma level in relation to antimanic effect in the acute therapy of manic states. Nord J Psychiatry 2006;60:181–182.Google Scholar
15.Carlsson, A, Wong, DT. Correction: a note on the discovery of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Life Sci 1997;61:1203.Google Scholar
16.Wegener, G, Rujescu, D. The current development of CNS drug research. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2013;16:1687–1693.Google Scholar