Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:05:19.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Abstract

How should archaeologists approach ethnicity? This concept, which has such wide currency in social and anthropological studies, remains elusive when we seek to apply it to the archaeological past. The importance of ethnicity in our late twentieth-century world can easily lead us to believe that it must long have been a key element in human relations and awareness. The practice of defining oneself and one's group by contrast and opposition to other individuals and other groups, from the family level upwards, appears a basic feature of human behaviour. Ethnicity is a part of this social logic, though ethnic groups, and ethnicity itself, are notoriously difficult to define.

Can we identify and distinguish ethnic groupings in the archaeological record? Had one posed that question earlier this century the answer would have no doubt have made immediate reference to the ‘culture-people hypothesis’; the idea that archaeological assemblages may be combined into ‘cultures’ defined by recurring features, be they metalwork, ceramic forms and decoration, or lithic technology. Each culture so defined might be equated (hypothetically at least) with a former people. Ethnographic studies, however, have long shown that these equations are overly simplistic. Phenomena such as the ‘Beaker culture’ are no longer assumed to be the material expression of a single ethnic group.

Where historical evidence is available, it may be able to overcome some of the difficulties and examine just how a historical ethnic group — as perceived and defined by its own members — relates to a body of archaeological material. Jonathan Hall's study of ethnic identity in ancient Greece provides an excellent example of just such an approach. It also raises broader issues concerning the definition of ethnicity and its recognition in the archaeological record. Hall himself takes the view that ethnicity depends on what people say, not what they do; hence material culture alone, without supporting literary evidence, is an insufficient basis for the investigation of ethnic identity in past societies. To accept that view is to rule out the study of ethnicity for the greater part of the human past; we may suspect that ethnic groups played a part, but be unable to identify any surviving cultural parameters. Against such a pessimistic assessment, however, there is the contrary argument, that ethnicity may be expressed as well in material culture as in words. Should that be the case, archaeology may indeed be well equipped to open a window on past ethnicity, whether or not there are relevant contemporary texts.

We begin this review feature in our usual way, with a summary by Jonathan Hall of the arguments set out in his book. Five commentators then take up the theme, raising comments and criticisms to which Hall responds in a closing reply.

Type
Review Feature
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alty, J., 1982. Dorians and Ionians. Journal of Hellenic Studies 102, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ampolo, C., 1993. La città dell'eccesso: per la storia di Sibari fino al 510 a.C, in Sibari e la Sibaritide. Atti del 32* convegno di studi suila Magna Grecia. Naples, 213–54.Google Scholar
Andrén, A., 1998. Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. trans. Crozier, A.. New York (NY): Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M., 1996. Ethnicity: Anthropological Constructions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barletta, B., 1983. Ionic Influence in Archaic Sicily: the Monumental Art. (SIMA Pocketbook 23.) Göteborg: P. Åströms.Google Scholar
Barth, F. (ed.), 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, the Social Organisation of Cultural Difference. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bentley, G.C, 1987. Ethnicity and practice. Comparative Studies in Society and History 29, 2455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, M., 1987. Black Athena: the Afroasiatic roots of Classical Civilization. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. & Williams, H. (eds.), 1998. The past in the past: the re-use of ancient monuments. World Archaeology 30(1).Google Scholar
Cartledge, P., 1993. The Greeks: a Portrait of Self and Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A., 1974. Two-dimensional Man. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
d'Agostino, B., 1996. L' esperienza coloniale nell' immaginario mitico dei Greci, in I Greci in Occidente, ed. Carratelli, G. Pugliese. Milan: Bompiani, 209–14.Google Scholar
Devalle, S.B.C., 1992. Discourses of Ethnicity: Culture and Protest in Jharkhand. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dragadze, T., 1980. The place of ‘ethnos’ theory in Soviet anthropology, in Soviet and Western Anthropology, ed. Gellner, E.. London: Duckworth, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, T.H., 1991. The cultural contexts of ethnic differences. Man 26, 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, T.H., 1992. Us and Them in Modern Societies: Ethnicity and Nationalism in Mauritius, Trinidad and Beyond. London: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E.E., 1940. The Nuer: a Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York (NY): Harper.Google Scholar
Glazer, N. & Moynihan, D.P., 1975. ‘Introduction’, in Ethnicity: Theory and Experience, eds. Glazer, N & Moynihan, D.P.. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1967. The Social Organisation of the LoWiili. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graves-Brown, P., Jones, S. & Gamble, C. (eds.), 1996. Cultural Identity and Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, E., 1989. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1993. Ethnic Identity in the Argolid, 900–600 Bc. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1995a. Approaches to ethnicity in the Early Iron Age of Greece, in Time Tradition, and Society in Greek Archaeology: Bridging the ‘Great Divide’, ed. Spencer, N.. London: Routledge, 617.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1995b. How Argive was the Argive Heraion: the political and cultic geography of the Argive Plain, 900–400 Bc. American Journal of Archaeology 99, 577613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J., 1997. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J., forthcoming. Contested ethnicities: Macedonia within evolving definitions of Greek identity, in Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity, ed. Malkin, I.. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. & Yalouri, E., 1996. Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society. Antiquity 70, 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S., 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Just, R., 1989. ‘Triumph of the Ethnos’, in History and Ethnicity, eds. Tonkin, E., McDonald, M. & Chapman, M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karakasidou, A., 1997. Fields of Wheat, Hills of Blood. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D., 1997. Defining ancient Greek ethnicity. Diaspora 6, 97110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, C, 1977. Pots and peoples, in Mountains and Lowlands. Essays in the Archaeology of Greater Mesopotamia, eds. Levine, L. & Young, T.C.. (Bibliotheca Mesopotamica 7.) Malibu (CA): Undena Press, 91112.Google Scholar
Kurke, L., 1992. The politics of habrosyne in archaic Greece. Classical Antiquity 11, 91120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, H.G., 1995. An Intermediate Greek-English lexicon Founded upon the Seventh Edition of Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon 1888. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, H., 1996. Talking Trojan: Speech and Community in the Iliad. Lanham (MD): Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mertens, D., 1976. Zur archaischen Architektur der achäischen Kolonien in Unteritalien, in Neue Forschungen in griechischen Heiligliimern, ed. Jantzen, U.. Tübingen: Wasmuth, 167–96.Google Scholar
Mertens, D., 1990. Some principal features of West Greek colonial architecture, in Greek Colonists and Native Populations, ed. Descoeudres, J.-P.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 373–83.Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1996. Athens and Persia: a Study in Cultural Receptivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C, 1990. Athletes and Oracles: the Transformation of Olympia and Delphi in the Eighth Century BC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, I., 1996a. Negotiated peripherality in Iron Age Greece. Journal of World Systems Research 2, 12, 16.Google Scholar
Morris, I., 1996b. The strong principle of equality and the archaic origins of Greek democracy, in Demokratia: a Conversation on Democracies, Ancient Modern, eds. Ober, J. & Hedrick, C.. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Myres, J.L., 1930. Who were the Greeks? Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C, 1987. Archaeology and Language. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C, 1993. The Roots of Ethnicity: Archaeology, Genetics and the Origins of Europe. Rome: Unione Internazionale degli Instituti di Archeologia, Storia e Storia dell'Arte in Roma.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C, 1994. The archaeology of identity, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 15, ed. Peterson, G.B.. Salt Lake City (UT): University of Utah Press, 283348.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C, 1995. ‘Ever in process of becoming’: the autochthony of the Greeks, in The Good Idea: Democracy and Ancient Greece, ed. Koumoulides, J.A.. New Rochelle (NY): A.D. Caratzas, 728.Google Scholar
Rosen, R., 1997. Homer and Hesiod, in A New Companion to Homer, eds. Morris, I. & Powell, B.. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 463–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saïd, S. (ed.), 1991. Hellenismos. Quelques jalons pour une histoirc de Vidcntite grecque. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. (ed.), 1989. Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity. London: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.D., 1986. The Ethnic Origin of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A., 1980. Archaic Greece: the Age of Experiment. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Sparkes, B.W., 1982. The Melian Dialogue of Thucydides, in An Island Polity, the Archaeology of Exploitation in Melos, eds. Renfrew, C. & Wagstaff, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319–22.Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1968. Economy and Society I. New York (NY): Bedminster Press (originally published as Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen [1922]).Google Scholar
Weiner, A.B., 1987. The Trobrianders of Papua New Guinea. Orlando (FL): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
West, M.L., 1985. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Its Nature, Structure, and Origins. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Whitley, J., 1997. Cretanlaws and Cretan literacy. American Journal of Archaeology 101, 635–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, E., 1956. Doriens et loniens: essai sur la valeur du critère ethnique appliqué à l'étude de l'shistoire et de la civilisation grecques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Winter, I., 1995. Homer's Phoenicians: history, ethnography, or literary trope? [A perspective on early Orientalism], in The Ages of Homer: a Tribute to Emily Townsend Vermeule, eds. Carter, J. & Morris, S.. Austin (TX): The University of Texas Press, 247–71.Google Scholar