Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-mgxrv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-21T03:31:11.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of Warning Lights and Siren Based on Hospital Time-Critical Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Andreia Marques-Baptista ,
Pamela Ohman-Strickland ,
Kimberly T. Baldino ,
Michael Prasto  and
Mark A. Merlin
Andreia Marques-Baptista*
Affiliation:
Attending Emergency Medicine Physician, Emergency Medical Services Division, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Pamela Ohman-Strickland
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Biostatistics, UMDNJ-Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Kimberly T. Baldino
Affiliation:
UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Medical Education, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Michael Prasto
Affiliation:
UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Medical Education, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Mark A. Merlin
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Chair, NJ MICU Advisory Board, New Jersey Department of Health, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
*
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Place, Medical Education Building Room 104, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA E-mail: merlinma@umdnj.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the time saved by usage of lights and siren (L&S) during emergency medical transport and measure the total number of time-critical hospital interventions gained by this time difference.

Methods:

A retrospective study was performed of all advanced life support (ALS) transports using lights and siren to this university emergency department during a three-week period. Consecutive times were measured for 112 transports and compared with measured transport times for a personal vehicle traveling the same day of the week and time of day without lights and siren. The time-critical hospital interventions are defined as procedures or treatments that could not be performed in the prehospital setting requiring a physician. The project assessed whether the patients received the hospital interventions within the average time saved using lights and siren transport.

Results:

The average difference in time with versus without L&S was -2.62 minutes (95% CI: -2.60− -2.63, paired t-test p <0.0001). The average transport time with L&S was 14.5 ±7.9 minutes (min) (1 standard deviation/minute (min), range = 1–36 min.). The average transport time without L&S was 17.1 ±8.3 min (range = 1−40 min). Of the 112 charts evaluated, five patients (4.5%) received time-critical hospital interventions. No patients received time-critical interventions within the time saved by utilizing lights and siren. Longer distances did not result in time saved with lights and siren.

Conclusions:

Limiting lights and siren use to the patients requiring hospital interventions will decrease the risks of injury and death, while adding the benefit of time saved in these critical patients.

Keywords

accidentsambulanceemergencylightsprehospitalsiren

Information

Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 335 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Blum, A: The need for not breaking the sound barrier. JAMA 1980;244(12):1327–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Clawson, JJ, Martin, RL, Cady, GA, Maio, RF: The wake effect—Emergency vehicle-related collisions. Prehosp Disaster Med 1997;12(4):274–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Elling, R: Dispelling myths of ambulance accidents. J Emerg Med Serv 1989;14(7):60–65.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Kuisma, M, Holmstrom, P, Repo, J, Maatta, T, Nousila-Wiik, M, Boyd, J: Prehospital mortality in an EMS system using medical priority dispatching: A community based cohort study. Resuscitation 2004;61(3):297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians (NAEMSP) and the National Association of State EMS Directors (NAEMSDI: Use of warning lights and siren in emergency medical vehicle response and patient transport (position paper). Prehosp Disaster Med 1994;9(2):133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hunt, RC, Brown, LH, Cabinum, ES, Whitley, TW, Prasad, NH, Owens, CH Jr, Maya, CE Jr : Is ambulance transport time with lights and siren faster than that without? Ann Emerg Med 1995;25(4):507–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Cone, DC, Galante, N, MacMillan, D: Can emergency medical dispatch systems safely reduce first-responder call volume? Prehosp Emerg Care 2008;12(3):479–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Rousseeuw, RJ, Leroy, AM: Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York: Wiley, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2004.Google Scholar
10.Lacher, M, Bausher, LH: Lights and siren in pediatric 911 ambulance transports: Are they being misused? Ann Emerg Med 1997;29(2):223–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Wolfberg, D: Lights, sirens and liability. JEMS 1996;21(2):38–40.Google ScholarPubMed
12.O'Brien, DJ, Price, TG, Adams, P: The effectiveness of lights and siren use during ambulance transport by paramedics. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999;3(2):127–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Clawson, JJ: Running “hot” and the case of Sharron Rose. JEMS 1991;16(7):11–13.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Pirrallo, RG, Swor, RA: Characteristics of fatal ambulance crashes during emergency and non-emergency operation. Prehosp Disaster Med 1994;9(2):125–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.De Lorenzo, RA, Eilers, MA: Lights and siren: A review of emergency vehicle warning systems. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20(12):1331–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Auerbach, PS, Morris, JA, Phillips, JB, Redlinger, SR, Vaughn, WK: An analysis of ambulance accidents in Tennessee. JAMA 1987;258(11):1487–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Table 8, Ambulance involvement in fatal crashes by person type of fatalities and crash type, in Fatal Accident Reporting System 1990.Google Scholar
18.National Traffic Safety Administration: A Review of Information on Fatal Traffic Crashes in the United States. Washington, DC, National Traffic Safety Administration, 1991, p 111.Google Scholar
19.Kupas, DF, Dula, DJ, Pino, BJ: Patient outcome using medical protocol to limit “lights and siren” transport. Prehosp Disaster Med 1994;9(4):226–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed