No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: NEPA as a Tool for Strategic Analysis and Decision Making
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2015
Abstract
Programmatic analyses under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) are broadly scoped for assessing the environmental impacts of federal actions across a span of conditions, such as facilities, geographic regions, or multiproject programs. Programmatic NEPA analysis can be an excellent decision-making tool that facilitates proactive and strategic considerations of environmental and other important criteria ahead of the need for site-specific or project-level action. Employing a programmatic approach can lead to more informed decision making and to streamlined processes for individual actions. This article showcases examples of effective programmatic NEPA analysis and explores the use of programmatic NEPA analysis as a tool for strategic analysis and decision making.
Environmental Practice 16: 316–322 (2014)
Information
- Type
- Features
- Information
- Copyright
- © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2014
References
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture. 2001. Fruit Fly Cooperative Control Program: Final Environmental Impact Statement. APHIS, Washington, DC, 369 pp. Available at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/ea/downloads/fffeis.pdf.Google Scholar
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US Department of Energy (USDOE). 2012. EIS-0403: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement—Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States. BLM and USDOE, Washington, DC. Available at http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0403-final-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement.Google Scholar
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US Forest Service (USFS). 2008. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Geothermal Leasing in the Western United States. BLM and USFS, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/energy/geothermal/geothermal_nationwide/Documents/Final_PEIS.html.Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 2005. 40 CFR 1500–1508: Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. CEQ, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2011-title40-vol33/CFR-2011-title40-vol33-part-id1102/content-detail.html.Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 2007, September 18. Review of NEPA Programmatic Guidance (Draft) to Federal Agencies for Preparing Programmatic EISs and EAs (ER 07/776/). CEQ, Washington, DC, 27 pp. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/draft_effective_use_of_programmatic_nepa_reviews_august_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 2014, December 18. Effective Use of Programmatic NEPA Review. CEQ, Washington, DC, 56 pp. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/effective_use_of_programmatic_nepa_reviews_final_dec2014_searchable.pdf.Google Scholar
Salazar, K. 2009, March 11. Secretary of the Interior Order No. 3285: Renewable Energy Development by the Department of the Interior. US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 3 pp. Available at http://www.blm.gov/or/energy/opportunity/files/order_3285.pdf.Google Scholar
US Congress. 2000. Agriculture Risk Protection Act of 2000: Public Law 106-224. US Congress, Washington, DC, 98 pp. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-106publ224/html/PLAW-106publ224.htm.Google Scholar
US Congress. 2005, August 8. Energy Policy Act of 2005: Public Law 109-58. US Congress, Washington, DC, 551 pp. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ58/pdf/PLAW-109publ58.pdf.Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2012a, March. Environmental Assessment for Mexican Fruit Fly Cooperative Eradication Program: Cameron County, Texas—Environmental Assessment. USDA, Washington, DC, 19 pp. Available at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/ea/downloads/MexFF-CameronTX-mar2012EA.pdf.Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2012b, August. Environmental Assessment for Mediterranean Fruit Fly Cooperative Eradication Program: Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California—Environmental Assessment. USDA, Washington, DC, 16 pp. Available at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/ea/downloads/2012/Medfly-SanBernardinoCo-CA-EA.pdf.Google Scholar
US Department of Energy (USDOE). 1999, August. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Alternative Strategies for the Long-Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride. Federal Register 64(153):43358–43364. Available at http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0269-record-decision.Google Scholar
US Department of Energy (USDOE). 2004a. EIS-0359: Final Environmental Impact Statement—Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Paducah, Kentucky, Site. USDOE, Washington, DC. Available at http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0359-final-environmental-impact-statement.Google Scholar
US Department of Energy (USDOE). 2004b. EIS-0360: Final Environmental Impact Statement—Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site. USDOE, Washington, DC. Available at http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0360-final-environmental-impact-statement.Google Scholar