Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T02:08:25.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

ROBERT WOLFE*
Affiliation:
School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada

Abstract

The commonplace tendency is to blame the difficulties of the Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations on the World Trade Organization (WTO) itself. In contrast, I suggest in the first section of this article that exogenous structural factors, especially changing commodity prices and trade flows, fatally undermined the Round. In the second section, I discount the significance of endogenous institutional factors such as the number of participants, the size of the agenda, or the Single Undertaking, although design failures, notably in the ‘modalities’ for negotiation, did hurt. But what hurt even more was the way the WTO, in common with most multilateral organizations, has not caught up with the shifting centre of gravity in global governance. The trading system is no longer a transatlantic bargain. The regulatory issues on the twenty-first century trade policy agenda will inevitably be negotiated in Geneva, but only after a new trans-Pacific accommodation recognizes China's central role.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Robert Wolfe 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable