Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-hqrjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T18:48:15.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion of the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders with the family caregivers of cancer patients: An example from a major cancer center in Saudi Arabia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Mohammad Z. Al-Shahri*
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Medicine, Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Mahmoud Sroor
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Medicine, Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Kaser Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Kaser El-Aini School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Wael Ali Said Ghareeb
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Medicine, Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Suzan Alhassanin
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Medicine, Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Clinical Oncology Department, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
Heba Aly Ateya
Affiliation:
Palliative Care Medicine, Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
*
Corresponding author: Mohammad Z. Al-Shahri; Email: alshahri_m@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objectives

To explore the views of the family caregivers (FCGs) about the “do-not-resuscitate” (DNR) discussions and decision-making processes that occurred during hospitalization in a Saudi cancer center.

Methods

In this cross-sectional survey, the FCGs of inpatients with advanced cancer completed a self-administered questionnaire soon after giving the patients a DNR status designation by their oncologists.

Results

Eighty-two FCGs participated in the study, with a median age of 36.5 years and male preponderance (70.7%). The FCGs were mostly sons (41.5%), daughters (14%), or brothers (11%) of patients. Only 13.4% of mentally competent patients had the chance to listen to the DNR discussion. The discussion mainly occurred in the ward corridor (48.8%) or another room away from the patients’ rooms (35.4%). In 36.6% of cases, the discussion took ≤5 minutes. Half of the FCGs stated that the oncologists’ justifications for the DNR decision were unconvincing. The majority (84.2%) of the FCGs felt that the healthcare providers should share the DNR decision-making with patients (1.2%), families (69.5%), or both (13.4%). FCGs ≤ 30 years of age were more supportive of giving patients’ families a chance to participate in the DNR decision-making process (p = 0.012).

Significance of results

There is considerable room for improving the current practice of DNR discussions and decision-making processes in the studied setting. A readily feasible rectifying measure is to ensure the adequacy of time and privacy when planning for DNR discussions. We expect our findings to draw the attention of stakeholders to a compelling need for reviewing the current policies and processes, aiming to improve the experience of cancer patients and their FCGs.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable