Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-l8wb7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-02T23:08:38.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass Casualty Response in the 2008 Mumbai Terrorist Attacks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Nobhojit Roy ,
Vikas Kapil ,
Italo Subbarao  and
Isaac Ashkenazi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The November 26-29, 2008, terrorist attacks on Mumbai were unique in its international media attention, multiple strategies of attack, and the disproportionate national fear they triggered. Everyone was a target: random members of the general population, iconic targets, and foreigners alike were under attack by the terrorists.

Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study of the distribution of terror victims to various city hospitals, critical radius, surge capacity, and the nature of specialized medical interventions was gathered through police, legal reports, and interviews with key informants.

Results: Among the 172 killed and 304 injured people, about four-fifths were men (average age, 33 years) and 12% were foreign nationals. The case-fatality ratio for this event was 2.75:1, and the mortality rate among those who were critically injured was 12%. A total of 38.5% of patients arriving at the hospitals required major surgical intervention. Emergency surgical operations were mainly orthopedic (external fixation for compound fractures) and general surgical interventions (abdominal explorations for penetrating bullet/shrapnel injuries).

Conclusions: The use of heavy-duty automatic weapons, explosives, hostages, and arson in these terrorist attacks alerts us to new challenges to medical counterterrorism response. The need for building central medical control for a coordinated response and for strengthening public hospital capacity are lessons learned for future attacks. These particular terrorist attacks had global consequences, in terms of increased security checks and alerts for and fears of further similar “Mumbai-style” attacks. The resilience of the citizens of Mumbai is a critical measure of the long-term effects of terror attacks.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:273–279)

Keywords

Mumbaiterrorist attackIndiasurgical servicesresiliencebystandersdelivery of health caredisaster responseemergency service, hospitalindiamass casualty incidentsmortalityresilience, psychologicalsurgery department, hospitalterrorismworld health

Information

Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 273 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.World Gazetteer. World: largest cities and towns and statistics of their population. http://world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gcis&lng=en&des=wg&srt=npan&col=abcdefghinoq&msz=1500&geo=0. Published 2010. Accessed October 16, 2011.Google Scholar
2.Cocks, RA.Medical care in civil disorder. Trauma. 1999;1:255–263.Google Scholar
3.Rabasa, A, Blackwill, R, Chalk, PThe Lessons of Mumbai.Arlington, VA: RAND Corporation; 2009.Google Scholar
4.Peleg, K, Aharonson-Daniel, L, Michael, M, Shapira, SCIsrael Trauma Group. Patterns of injury in hospitalized terrorist victims. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21 (4):258–262.Google Scholar
5.Copenhagen Consensus Center. Copenhagen Consensus 2008. http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Files/Filer/CC08/Presse/Pressemeddelelse_Copenhagen_Consensus_2008_-_24_01_2008.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2011.Google Scholar
6.Abul Aziz, A.The burden of terrorism in Malaysia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18 (2):115–119.Google Scholar
7.Duraphe, ATMumbai terror attack final form.Submitted in the court of Addl. Ch. M.M., 37th Court, Esplanade. http://www.hindu.com/nic/mumbai-terror-attack-final-form.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed October 16, 2011.Google Scholar
8.de Ceballos, JP, Turégano-Fuentes, F, Perez-Diaz, D, Sanz-Sanchez, M, Martin-Llorente, C, Guerrero-Sanz, JE.11 March 2004: The terrorist bomb explosions in Madrid, Spain—an analysis of the logistics, injuries sustained and clinical management of casualties treated at the closest hospital. Crit Care. 2005;9 (1):104–111.Google Scholar
9.Roy, N.Attack on the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel: a proxy war on America? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3 (1):1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Madhiwalla, N, Roy, N.Bombing medical facilities: a violation of international humanitarian law. Indian J Med Ethics. 2009;6 (2):64–65.Google Scholar
11.Kirschenbaum, L, Keene, A, O’Neill, P, Westfal, R, Astiz, ME.The experience at St. Vincent's Hospital, Manhattan, on September 11, 2001: preparedness, response, and lessons learned. Crit Care Med. 2005;33 1(Suppl)S48–S52.Google Scholar
12.Frykberg, ER.Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope? J Trauma. 2002;53 (2):201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Peleg, K, Aharonson-Daniel, L, Stein, MIsraeli Trauma Group (ITG). Gunshot and explosion injuries: characteristics, outcomes, and implications for care of terror-related injuries in Israel. Ann Surg. 2004;239 (3):311–318.Google Scholar
14.Deshpande, AA, Mehta, S, Kshirsagar, NA.Hospital management of Mumbai train blast victims. Lancet. 2007;369 (9562):639–640.Google Scholar
15.Rignault, DP, Deligny, MC.The 1986 terrorist bombing experience in Paris. Ann Surg. 1989;209 (3):368–373.Google Scholar
16.Kluger, Y, Peleg, K, Daniel-Aharonson, L, Mayo, AIsraeli Trauma Group. The special injury pattern in terrorist bombings. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199 (6):875–879.Google Scholar
17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency preparedness and response.Predicting casualty severity and hospital capacity Predicting triage severity. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/masscasualties/capacity.asp. Accessed October 16, 2011.Google Scholar
18.Shenoy, S, Pai, P, Dalvie, S, Bapat, R.Analytical data of January 1993 communal riot victims—the KEM Hospital experience. J Postgrad Med. 1993;39:10–13.Google Scholar
19.Kashuk, JL, Halperin, P, Caspi, G, Colwell, C, Moore, EE.Bomb explosions in acts of terrorism: evil creativity challenges our trauma systems. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209 (1):134–140.Google Scholar
20.Roy, N, Murlidhar, V, Chowdhury, R.Where there are no emergency medical services-prehospital care for the injured in Mumbai, India. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25 (2):145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Lerner, EB, O’Connor, RE, Schwartz, R.Blast-related injuries from terrorism: an international perspective. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11 (2):137–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Goenka, AH, Jethwani, KKEM Hospital's response to serial bomb blasts in the Mumbai suburban trains on 11th July 2006: students' perspective. http://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=2006;volume=52;issue=4;spage=330;epage=330;aulast=Goenka. Published 2006. Accessed October 16, 2011.Google Scholar
23.Rodoplu, Ü, Arnold, JL, Tokyay, R, Ersoy, G, Cetiner, S, Yücel, T.Mass-casualty terrorist bombings in Istanbul, Turkey, November 2003: report of the events and the prehospital emergency response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19 (2):133–145.Google Scholar
24.Kosashvili, Y, Daniel, LA, Peleg, K, Horowitz, A, Laor, D, Blumenfeld, A.Israeli hospital preparedness for terrorism-related multiple casualty incidents: can the surge capacity and injury severity distribution be better predicted? Injury. 2009;40:727–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Caldicott, DG, Edwards, NA, Tingey, D, Bonnin, R.Medical response to a terrorist attack and weapons of mass destruction. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002;14 (3):230–239.Google Scholar