Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-2r2wp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T13:23:23.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Digital Pens for Rapid Epidemiologic Data Collection During a Foodborne Outbreak Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Abigail A. Mathewson ,
Elizabeth R. Daly ,
Steffany J. Cavallo  and
Adnela Alic
Abigail A. Mathewson*
Affiliation:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, New Hampshire
Elizabeth R. Daly
Affiliation:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, New Hampshire
Steffany J. Cavallo
Affiliation:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, New Hampshire
Adnela Alic
Affiliation:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, New Hampshire
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Abigail A. Mathewson, DVM, MPH, Infectious Disease Surveillance Section, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, 29 Hazen Dr, Concord, NH 03301-6504 (e-mail: abigail.mathewson@dhhs.state.nh.us).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Public health investigations require rapid assessment, response, and initiation of control measures. In 2012, the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services used digital pens to rapidly acquire epidemiologic data during a gastrointestinal illness outbreak.

Methods

Menus were obtained and a standard questionnaire was administered to exposed persons using digital pens. Questionnaire data were downloaded into an electronic file for analysis.

Results

Sixty-nine (74%) of 93 exposed persons completed a questionnaire. Of 6389 data entries made on digital paper, 218 (3%) required correction; of these, 201 (92%) involved a free-form variable and 17 (8%) involved a check-box variable. Digital pens saved an estimated 5 to 6 hours of data-entry time.

Conclusions

This outbreak provided an opportunity to assess the value of digital pens for decreasing data-entry burden and allowing more timely data analysis in an emergent setting. Depending on the size of the outbreak and complexity of the survey, there is likely a threshold when use of digital pens would provide a clear benefit to outbreak response. As new technology becomes available for use in emergency preparedness settings, public health agencies must continuously review and update response plans and evaluate investigation tools to ensure timely disease control and response activities. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:349–353)

Keywords

outbreak responsedigital penrapid surveyfoodborne outbreakinvestigation methodspublic health preparedness

Information

Type
Brief Reports
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 349 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response. Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning. http://www.cdc.gov/phpr/capabilities/index.htm. Published March 15, 2012. Accessed November 10, 2014.Google Scholar
2. Trust for America’s Health. Ready or Not? Protecting the Public from Diseases, Disasters, and Bioterrorism. http://healthyamericans.org/report/101/. Published December 2012. Accessed November 10, 2014.Google Scholar
3. Yasmin, S, Pogreba-Brown, K, Stewart, J, et al. Use of an online survey during an outbreak of Clostridium perfringens in a retirement community-Arizona, 2012. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;20:205-209.Google Scholar
4. Greene, SK, Daly, ER, Talbot, EA, et al. Recurrent multistate outbreak of Salmonella Newport associated with tomatoes from contaminated fields, 2005. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136:157-165.Google Scholar
5. Ricchetti-Masterson, K, Horney, J. Social factors as modifiers of Hurricane Irene evacuation behavior in Beaufort County, NC. PLOS Curr. 2013; Jun 5:5.Google Scholar
6. Cooper, S. More time for patients: Digital pens for clinicians. Br J Health Care Manag. 2012;18:249-250.Google Scholar
7. Helm, MA, Hauke, JA, Schlechtriemen, TB, et al. Digital pen and paper—introducing a new technology for prehospital data recording in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18:363-364.Google Scholar
8. Vowden, KA, Vowden, PB. Digital pen and paper technology: a tool for data capture and patient management. Wounds UK. 2010;6(2):74-78.Google Scholar
9. Anoto Group AB. Public Safety Improves with Wireless Technology. Healthcare Technology Online. http://www.healthcaretechnologyonline.com/doc/public-safety-improves-with-wireless-0001. Published September 3, 2008. Accessed November 10, 2014.Google Scholar
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks—United States, 1998–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62:1-34.Google Scholar