Abort67, ‘Why We Show Images’ (2014), http://abort67.co.uk/why_we_show_images [no longer available].Google Scholar

Abortion Law Reform Association, A Report on NHS Abortion Services (London: Abortion Law Reform Association, 1997).Google Scholar

Abse, Leo, Private Member (London: Macdonald, 1973).Google Scholar

Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, Induced Abortion and Mental Health: A Systematic Review of the Mental Health Outcomes of Induced Abortion, Including Their Prevalence and Associated Factors (London: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, 2011).Google Scholar

Ackroyd, Peter, London: The Biography (London: Chatto & Windus, 2000).Google Scholar

Aiken, Abigail, Lohr, Patricia A., Lord, Jonathan, Ghosh, Nabanita, and Starling, Jennifer, ‘Effectiveness, Safety and Acceptability of No-Test Medical Abortion Provided via Telemedicine: A National Cohort Study’, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 128 no. 9 (2021), 1464–74.Google Scholar

All Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group, ‘A Report into Freedom of Conscience in Abortion Provision’ (2016), www.conscienceinquiry.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Pro-Life-APPG-Freedom-of-Conscience-in-Abortion-Provision.pdfGoogle Scholar

All Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group, ‘Foetal Sentience & Pain: An Evidence Review’ (2020), https://lordalton.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/2020-pro-life-appg-report-on-foetal-pain.pdfGoogle Scholar

Allen, Isobel, Counselling Services for Sterilisation, Vasectomy and Termination of Pregnancy (London: Policy Studies Institute, 1985).Google Scholar

Allen, Isobel, Family Planning, Sterilisation and Abortion Services (London: Policy Studies Institute, 1981).Google Scholar

Alton, David, ‘Truth Should Speak to Power – The 50th Anniversary of the Abortion Act’ (2017), https://davidalton.net/2017/10/27/truth-should-speak-to-power-the-50th-anniversary-of-the-abortion-act-text-of-a-speech-delivered-outside-of-the-british-parliament-on-the-50th-anniversary-of-legislation-that-has-claimed-more-than/Google Scholar

Alton, David, What Kind of Country? (Basingstoke: Marshall Pickering, 1988).Google Scholar

Alton, David with Holmes, Alison, Whose Choice Anyway? The Right to Life (Basingstoke: Marshall Pickering, 1988).Google Scholar

Amery, Fran, Beyond Pro-Life and Pro-Choice: The Changing Politics of Abortion in Britain (Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Amery, Fran, ‘Social Questions, Medical Answers: Contesting British Abortion Law’, Social Politics, vol. 21 no. 1 (2013), 26–49.Google Scholar

Anitha, Sundari and Gill, Aisha K., ‘Making Politics Visible: Discourses on Gender and Race in the Problematisation of Sex-Selective Abortion’, Feminist Review, vol. 120 no. 1 (2018), 1–19.Google Scholar

Archbishop Cranmer, ‘Kevin (Lord) Shinkwin Appointed to Equality and Human Rights Commission’ (2017), https://archbishopcranmer.com/kevin-lord-shinkwin-equality-human-rights-commission/Google Scholar

Argent, Vincent and Pavey, Lin, ‘Can Nurses Legally Perform Surgical Induced Abortion?’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 33 no. 2 (2007), 79–82.Google Scholar

ARK, ‘Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey’ (2016), www.ark.ac.uk/nilt/2016/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

ARK, ‘Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey, 2018’ (2019), www.ark.ac.uk/nilt/2018/Google Scholar

Armstrong, Liz and McChlery, Anne, ‘No More Reservations About Abortion Rights: The Scottish Abortion Campaign Comments’, Engender, no. 16 (1997), 7.Google Scholar

Ashton, J. R., Chamberlain, A., Dennis, K. J., Rowe, R. G., Waters, W. E., and Wheeller, M. J., ‘The Wessex Abortion Studies: II. Attitudes of Consultant Gynaecologists to Provision of Abortion Services’, Lancet, vol. 315 no. 8160 (1980), 140–42.Google Scholar

Attar Taylor, Eleanor, ‘British Attitudes to Abortion’ (2017), www.natcen.ac.uk/blog/british-attitudes-to-abortionGoogle Scholar

Attar Taylor, Eleanor and Scott, Jacqueline, ‘Gender: New Consensus or Continuing Battleground?’ in Phillips, Daniel, Curtice, John, Phillips, Miranda and Perry, Jane (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 35th Report (London: The National Centre for Social Research, 2018), pp. 56–85.Google Scholar

Back Off Scotland, ‘About’ (2021), www.backoffscotland.comGoogle Scholar

Baird, Dugald, ‘A Fifth Freedom?’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5471 (1965), 1141–48.Google Scholar

Baird, Dugald, ‘Abortion Games’, Lancet, vol. 298 no. 7734 (1971), 1145.Google Scholar

Baird, Dugald, ‘The Abortion Act 1967: The Advantages and Disadvantages’, Royal Society of Health Journal, vol. 90 no. 6 (1970), 291–95.Google ScholarPubMed

Barker, Anthony and Rush, Michael, The Member of Parliament and His Information (London: Allen & Unwin, 1970).Google Scholar

Baulieu, Etienne-Emile, The Abortion Pill (London: Century, 1992).Google Scholar

Bazlinton, Chris and Cowen, Anne, The Guardian Directory of Pressure Groups and Representative Organisations (London: Wilton House Publications, 1976).Google Scholar

BBC, ‘Gay Britannia’ (2017), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05bbtf2Google Scholar

BBC, ‘Abortion on Trial’ (2017), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09b1z7nGoogle Scholar

BBC Radio 5, ‘Sarah Ewart’s Abortion Journey from Northern Ireland’ (2013), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01jmx4xGoogle Scholar

BBC Radio 4, ‘Born with Down’s’ (2008), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00fkx0mGoogle Scholar

BBC Radio 4, ‘The Moral Maze: 50 Years of the Abortion Act’ (2017), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b097c1g3Google Scholar

BBC Radio 4, ‘The Reunion: Stonewall’ (2009), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00mpmm4Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth, The Normal Chaos of Love (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Berer, Marge, ‘Abortion Notification Forms’, Lancet, vol. 319 no. 8276 (1982), 857.Google Scholar

Berić, Berislav M. and Kupresanin, Milan, ‘Vacuum Aspiration Using Pericervical Block for Legal Abortion as an Outpatient Procedure up to the 12th Week of Pregnancy’, Lancet, vol. 298 no. 7725 (1971), 619–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berne, Eric, Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships (London: Penguin, 1964).Google Scholar

Bianchi, Diana W., Oepkes, Dick, and Ghidini, Alessandro, ‘Current Controversies in Prenatal Diagnosis 1: Should Noninvasive DNA Testing Be the Standard Screening Test for Down Syndrome in All Pregnant Women?’, Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 34 no. 1 (2014), 6–11.Google Scholar

Bigman, Fran, ‘Abortion in American Film since 2001’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology (2017), https://oxfordre.com/criminology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-16Google Scholar

Black, Julia, My Foetus (Channel 4, 2004).Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘Regulatory Conversations’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 29 no. 1 (2002), 163–96.Google Scholar

BMA, ‘Agenda of Annual Representative Meeting’, British Medical Journal (17 June 1978) 1633.Google Scholar

BMA, The Removal of Criminal Sanctions for Abortion: BMA Position Paper (London: British Medical Association, 2019).Google Scholar

Bogdanor, Vernon, Devolution in the United Kingdom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Boothroyd, Betty, Betty Boothroyd: The Autobiography (London: Arrow, 2001).Google Scholar

Bourne, Aleck, A Doctor’s Creed: Memoirs of a Gynaecologist (London: Gollancz, 1962).Google Scholar

Boutwood, Anne, ‘The Effect of the Act on Gynaecological Practice’ in Medical Protection Society, The Abortion Act 1967: Proceedings of a Symposium Held by the Medical Protection Society, in Collaboration with the RCGP at the RCOG (London: Pitman, 1969), pp. 49–56.Google Scholar

Bovey, Nigel, ‘MP Calls for Lower Abortion Time Limit’, The War Cry: Fighting for Hearts and Souls, no. 6812 (2007), 4–5.Google Scholar

Boyle, Mary and McEvoy, Jane, ‘Putting Abortion in Its Social Context: Northern Irish Women’s Experiences of Abortion in England’, Health, vol. 2 no. 3 (1998), 283–304.Google Scholar

BPAS, Abortion: Trusting Women to Decide and Doctors to Practice (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2015).Google Scholar

BPAS, ‘Back Off’ (2014), https://back-off.org/Google Scholar

BPAS, ‘BPAS Launches Emergency Abortion Pills by Post for Women in Northern Ireland amid Shameful Political Gameplay with Women’s Health during the Covid-19 Pandemic’ (2020), www.bpas.org/about-our-charity/press-office/press-releases/bpas-launches-emergency-abortion-pills-by-post-for-women-in-northern-ireland-amid-shameful-political-gameplay-with-women-s-health-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/Google Scholar

BPAS, Britain’s Abortion Law: What It Says and Why (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2013), www.reproductivereview.org/images/uploads/Britains_abortion_law.pdfGoogle Scholar

BPAS, ‘JR76 Case Report’ (c. 2018), www.bpas.org/media/3060/jr76-case-report.pdfGoogle Scholar

BPAS, ‘Medically Complex Women and Abortion Care’ (2018), www.bpas.org/media/2074/briefing-medically-complex-women-and-abortion-care.pdfGoogle Scholar

BPAS, ‘We Trust Women: About the Campaign’ (2019), https://wetrustwomen.org.uk/about-the-campaign/Google Scholar

Brazier, Alex and Fox, Ruth, ‘Enhancing the Backbench MP’s Role As a Legislator: The Case for Urgent Reform of Private Members Bills’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 63 no. 1 (2010), 201–11.Google Scholar

Brewer, Colin and Huntingford, Peter J., ‘Mortality from Abortion: The NHS Record’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 6136 (1978), 562.Google Scholar

Briggs, Eleanor M. and Mack, Alison E., ‘Termination of Pregnancy in the Unmarried’, Scottish Medical Journal, vol. 17 no. 12 (1972), 398–400.Google Scholar

Bristow, Jennie, ‘Misoprostol and the Transformation of the “Abortion Pill”’, Abortion Review (2011), www.abortionreview.org/index.php/site/article/908/ [no longer available].Google Scholar

British Humanist Association, ‘Health and Social Care Bill, 2010–2011 Report Stage: Nadine Dorries’ “Informed Consent” Amendments’ (2011), https://humanism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/bha-briefing-2011-health-social-care-bill.pdfGoogle Scholar

British Museum, ‘Desire, Love, Identity: Exploring LGBTQ Histories’ (2018), https://blog.britishmuseum.org/desire-love-identity-exploring-lgbtq-histories/Google Scholar

Brook, ‘Crisis Pregnancy Centres’ (2014), https://legacy.brook.org.uk/attachments/crisis_preg_centres_rept_10.2.14-2hiFINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar

Brooke, Stephen, Sexual Politics: Sexuality, Family Planning and the British Left from the 1880s to the Present Day (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Brookes, Barbara, Abortion in England, 1900–1967 (London: Croom Helm, 1988).Google Scholar

Brown, Callum G., Religion and the Demographic Revolution: Women and Secularisation in Canada, Ireland, UK and USA since the 1960s (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Brown, Callum G., The Death of Christian Britain: Understanding Secularisation 1800–2000 (London and New York: Routledge, 2nd edition, 2009).Google Scholar

Bruce, Fiona (Chair), ‘Parliamentary Inquiry into Abortion on the Grounds of Disability’ (2013), https://dontscreenusout.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Abortion-and-Disability-Report-17-7-13.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bruce, Steve, British Gods: Religion in Britain since 1900 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Brudenell, Michael, ‘Foreword’ in Hordern, Anthony, Legal Abortion: The English Experience (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971), pp. ix–xi.Google Scholar

Bryan, Beverly, Dadzie, Stella, and Scafe, Suzanne, The Heart of the Race: Black Women’s Lives in Britain (London: Virago, 1985).Google Scholar

Cameron, I. T., Michie, A. F., and Baird, D. T., ‘Therapeutic Abortion in Early Pregnancy with Antiprogestogen RU486 Alone or in Combination with Prostaglandin Analogue (Gemeprost)’, Contraception, vol. 34 no. 5 (1986), 459–68.Google Scholar

Campbell, Emma and Clancy, Siobhan, ‘From Grassroots to Government: Arts Engagement Strategies in Abortion Access Activism in Ireland’ in MacQuarrie, Colleen, Bloomer, Fiona, Pierson, Claire, and Stettner, Shannon (eds), Crossing Troubled Waters: Abortion in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Prince Edward Island (Prince Edward Island: Island Studies Press, 2018), pp. 204–34.Google Scholar

Campbell, Stuart, ‘4D and Prenatal Bonding: Still More Questions than Answers’, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 27 no. 3 (2006), 243–44.Google Scholar

Care Quality Commission, ‘Findings of Termination of Pregnancy Inspections Published’ (2012), www.cqc.org.uk/content/findings-termination-pregnancy-inspections-publishedGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Patrick, Abortion and Other Pregnancy-Related Risk Factors in Female Breast Cancer (London: Pension and Population Research Institute, 2001).Google Scholar

Carson, W. G., ‘Symbolic and Instrumental Dimensions of Early Factory Legislation: A Case Study in the Social Origins of Criminal Law’ in Hood, Roger (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy (London: Heinemann, 1974), pp. 107–38.Google Scholar

Cates, Willard, Grimes, David A., and Schulz, Kenneth F., ‘The Public Health Impact of Legal Abortion: 30 Years Later’, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 35 no. 1 (2003), 25–28.Google Scholar

CEDAW, Inquiry Concerning the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 (New York: Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 2018).Google Scholar

Chalmers, Iain and Anderson, Anne, ‘Factors Affecting Gestational Age at Therapeutic Abortion’, Lancet, vol. 299 no. 7764 (1972), 1324–26.Google Scholar

Charnock, Hannah, ‘“This Haunting Sadness”: Press Coverage of John Corrie’s Abortion (Amendment) Bill, 1979–1980’, Women’s History, vol. 2 no. 5 (2016), 16–22.Google Scholar

Cheetham, Juliet, ‘The Lane Committee’, comments made at Abortion Act 1967 Conference: A Promise Fulfilled?, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 24–25 October 2017.Google Scholar

Childs, Sarah, New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Christian Concern, ‘Abortion at Home: A Mystery Client Investigation’ (2021), https://christianconcern.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CC-Resource-Abortion-At-Home-A-Mystery-Client-Investigation-201210.pdfGoogle Scholar

Christian Concern, ‘Abortion for “Any Reason” Other than Sex-Selection, Says BPAS’ (2020), https://christianconcern.com/news/abortion-for-any-reason-other-than-sex-selection-says-bpas/Google Scholar

Christian Concern, ‘DIY Abortion Policy Led to Home Abortion at 28 Weeks’ (2020), https://christianconcern.com/comment/diy-abortion-policy-led-to-home-abortion-at-28-weeks/Google Scholar

Christian Concern, ‘Targeted Abortion Campaign Launched’ (2008), https://archive.christianconcern.com/our-concerns/abortion/targeted-abortion-campaign-launchedGoogle Scholar

Christian Concern, ‘Why We’re Taking “DIY” Abortion Case to Court of Appeal’ (2020), https://christianconcern.com/comment/why-were-taking-diy-abortion-case-to-court-of-appeal/Google Scholar

Christians in Parliament, ‘Fiona Bruce MP’ (2021), www.christiansinparliament.org.uk/about/members-stories/fiona-bruce-mp/Google Scholar

Church of England Board for Social Responsibility, Abortion: An Ethical Discussion (London: Church Information Office, 1965).Google Scholar

Church of England and Child Poverty Action Group, ‘“No one Knows What the Future Can Hold”: The Impact of the Two-Child Limit after Three Years’ (2020), https://cpag.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/policypost/No-one-knows-what-the-future-can-hold-FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar

Clark, M., Forstner, I., Pond, D. A., and Tredgold, R. F., ‘Sequels of Unwanted Pregnancy: A Follow-up of Patients Referred for Psychiatric Opinion’, Lancet, vol. 292 no. 7566 (1968), 501–03.Google Scholar

Clements, Ben, ‘Religion and the Sources of Public Opposition to Abortion in Britain: The Role of “Belonging”, “Behaving” and “Believing”’, Sociology, vol. 48 no. 2 (2014), 369–86.Google Scholar

Clements, Ben and Field, Clive D., ‘Abortion and Public Opinion in Great Britain: A 50-Year Retrospective’, Journal of Beliefs & Values, vol. 39 no. 4 (2018), 429–44.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Linda, Healing a Father’s Heart: A Post-Abortion Bible Study for Men (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1996).Google Scholar

Cochrane, Rosemary A. and Cameron, Sharon T., ‘Attitudes of Scottish Abortion Care Providers towards Provision of Abortion after 16 Weeks’ Gestation within Scotland’, European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, vol. 18 no. 3 (2013), 215–20.Google Scholar

Colvin, Madeleine, ‘The Legal Situation’ in Williams, Cerys (ed.), The Abortion Pill (Mifepristone/RU486): Widening the Choice for Women, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 26 October 1989 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 18–21.Google Scholar

Commons Select Committee, ‘Formal Minutes – Science and Technology Committee (Commons)’ (c. 2019), https://old.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/formal-minutes/Google Scholar

Condon, Guy and Hazard, Dave, Fatherhood Aborted: The Profound Effects of Abortion on Men (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2001).Google Scholar

Cook, Hera, The Long Sexual Revolution: English Women, Sex and Contraception, 1800–1975 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Corbyn, Jeremy, ‘50 Years Ago Today …’ (2017), https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/923869622193008641Google Scholar

Cornerstone Group, ‘About Us’ (n.d.), https://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/about/Google Scholar

Cossey, Dilys, ‘The Politics of the Abortion Pill: Breaking Down Barriers’ in Williams, Cerys (ed.), The Abortion Pill (Mifepristone/RU486): Widening the Choice for Women, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 26 October 1989 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 52–57.Google Scholar

Cotterell, Roger, The Sociology of Law: An Introduction (London: Butterworths, 2nd edition, 1992).Google Scholar

Coulter, Colin, ‘Direct Rule and the Unionist Middle Classes’ in English, Richard and Walker, Graham S. (eds), Unionism in Modern Ireland (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 169–91.Google Scholar

Cowan, David and Wincott, Daniel, ‘Exploring the Legal’ in Cowan, David and Wincott, Daniel (eds), Exploring the ‘Legal’ in Socio-Legal Studies (London: Palgrave, 2015), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Crowter, Heidi, ‘Downright Discrimination: Stop the Govt Singling Out Disabled Babies’, CrowdJustice.com (2021), www.crowdjustice.com/case/downrightdiscrimination/Google Scholar

Curtice, John, Clery, Elizabeth, Perry, Jane, Phillips, Miranda, and Rahim, Nilufer (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 36th Report (London: The National Centre for Social Research, 2019).Google Scholar

Dabner, Jack Duane, The Silent Scream (American Portrait Films, 1984).Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger and Davis, Gayle, The Sexual State: Sexuality and Scottish Governance, 1950–80 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Davis, Gayle and Davidson, Roger, ‘“The Fifth Freedom” or “Hideous Atheistic Expediency”: The Medical Community and Abortion Law Reform in Scotland, c.1960–75’, Medical History, vol. 50 no. 1 (2006), 29–48.Google Scholar

Davis, Gayle, O’Neill, Jane, Parker, Clare, and Sheldon, Sally, ‘All Aboard the “Abortion Express”: Geographic Variability, Domestic Travel and the 1967 British Abortion Act’ in Sethna, Christabelle and Davis, Gayle (eds), Abortion across Borders: Transnational Travel and Access to Abortion Services (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), pp. 101–22.Google Scholar

de Londras, Fiona, ‘“A Hope Raised and then Defeated”? The Continuing Harms of Irish Abortion Law’, Feminist Review, vol. 124 no. 1 (2020), 33–50.Google Scholar

Dee, Olivia, The Anti-Abortion Campaign in England, 1966–1989 (New York: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar

Deitch, Rodney, ‘Challenge Deferred over Abortion Notification Forms’, Lancet, vol. 319 no. 8271 (1982), 575–76.Google Scholar

Department of Health, ‘An Investigation into the BPAS Response into the Requests for Late Abortions – A Report from the CMO’ (2005), https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080728104226/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4119591Google Scholar

Department of Health, Guidance for Health and Social Care Professionals on Termination of Pregnancy in Northern Ireland (Belfast: DHSSPS, 2016).Google Scholar

Department of Health, Guidance in Relation to Requirements of the Abortion Act 1967 (London: Department of Health, 2014).Google Scholar

Department of Health, Letter from the CMO to PCT and SHA Chief Executives (21 September 2005), https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080728104226/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4119591Google Scholar

Department of Health, ‘Matching Department of Health Abortion Notifications and Data from the National Down’s Syndrome Cytogenetic Register, 2013’ (2015), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/433397/DH_NDSCR_matching_report_2013.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of Health, The Limited Circumstances for a Lawful Termination of Pregnancy in NI: A Guidance Document for Health and Social Care Professionals on Law and Clinical Practice, draft version (Belfast: DHSSPS, 2013).Google Scholar

Department of Health and Social Care, ‘Abortion Statistics 2020: Data Tables’ (2021), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/992250/abortion-statistics-2020-data-tables_Final.odsGoogle Scholar

Department of Health and Social Care, ‘Sex Ratios at Birth in Great Britain, 2013-17’ (2019), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/837965/Sex_ratios_at_birth_in_GB__2013–17.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of Health and Social Care, ‘The Abortion Act 1967 – Approval of a Class of Places’ (2018), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/768059/Approval_of_home_use_for_the_second_stage_of_early_medical_abortion.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of Health and Social Care, ‘The Abortion Act 1967 – Approval of a Class of Places’ (2020), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/876740/30032020_The_Abortion_Act_1967_-_Approval_of_a_Class_of_Places.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of Health and Social Security, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, Cmnd 9314 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1984).Google Scholar

Department of Health and Social Security, The Use of Fetuses and Fetal Material for Research: Report of the Advisory Group (Peel Report) (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1972).Google Scholar

Department of Justice, The Criminal Law on Abortion. Lethal Foetal Abnormality and Sexual Crime. A Consultation on Amending the Law by the Department of Justice (Belfast: Department of Justice, 2014).Google Scholar

Department of Justice, The Criminal Law on Abortion. Lethal Foetal Abnormality and Sexual Crime. Response to the Consultation and Policy Proposals (Belfast: Department of Justice, 2015).Google Scholar

Department of Justice and Department of Health, Report of the Working Group on Fatal Fetal Abnormality Healthcare and the Law on Termination of Pregnancy for Fatal Fetal Abnormality: Proposals to the Minister of Health and the Minister of Justice (2018), www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/report-fatal-fetal-abnormality-April-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Devlin, David, ‘Book for Burning?’, The General Practitioner (20 January 1978).Google Scholar

Devlin, Patrick, Easing the Passing: The Trial of Doctor John Bodkin Adams (London: Faber and Faber, 1986).Google Scholar

Dickens, Bernard, Abortion and the Law (London: MacGibbon & Key, 1966).Google Scholar

Diggory, P. L. C., ‘Some Experiences of Therapeutic Abortion’, Lancet, vol. 293 no. 7600 (1969), 873–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diplock, Kenneth, The Court as Legislators (Birmingham: Holdsworth Club, 1965).Google Scholar

Donald, Ian, ‘Naught for Your Comfort’, Journal of the Irish Medical Association, vol. 65 (1972), 279–89.Google Scholar

Don’t Screen Us Out, ‘Press Release: Woman with Down’s Syndrome Launches Landmark Case against UK Govt over Discriminatory Abortion Law’ (2020), https://dontscreenusout.org/press-release-woman-with-downs-syndrome-launches-landmark-case-against-uk-govt-over-discriminatory-abortion-law/Google Scholar

Don’t Screen Us Out, ‘Press Release: Woman with Down’s Syndrome’s Landmark Case against UK Govt over Discriminatory Abortion Law Plans to Go onto Court of Appeal’ (2021), https://dontscreenusout.org/press-release-court-of-appeal/Google Scholar

Don’t Screen Us Out, ‘Press Release – Woman with Down’s Syndrome’s Landmark Case against UK Govt over Discriminatory Abortion Law to Be Heard by Court of Appeal’ (2022), https://dontscreenusout.org/press-release-woman-with-downs-syndromes-landmark-case-against-uk-govt-over-discriminatory-abortion-law-to-be-heard-by-court-of-appeal/Google Scholar

Dubow, Sara, Ourselves Unborn: A History of the Fetus in Modern America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Dubuc, Sylvie and Coleman, David, ‘An Increase in the Sex Ratio of Births to India-Born Mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for Sex Selective Abortion’, Population and Development Review, vol. 33 no. 2 (2007), 383–400.Google Scholar

Dudley-Brown, Margaret, ‘The Duties of the GP under the Abortion Act’, in Medical Protection Society, The Abortion Act 1967: Proceedings of a Symposium Held by the Medical Protection Society, in Collaboration with the RCGP at the RCOG (London: Pitman, 1969), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Duxbury, Neil, Elements of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar

Dyer, Clare, ‘Charity Did Not Break Law in Giving Information about Late Abortions’, British Medical Journal, vol. 331 no. 7519 (2005), 716.Google Scholar

Dyer, Clare, ‘Receptionists May Not Invoke Conscience Clause’, British Medical Journal, vol. 297 no. 6662 (1988), 1493–94.Google Scholar

Education for Choice, ‘The “Parliamentary Inquiry” on Abortion and Disability’ (2013), https://educationforchoice.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-parliamentary-inquiry-on-abortion.htmlGoogle Scholar

Edwards, John, The Attorney General, Politics and the Public Interest (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1984).Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Paul R., The Population Bomb (New York: Sierra Club/Ballantine Books, 1968).Google Scholar

Engender, ‘Joint Statement on Scotland Bill, Amendment EC56, “Abortion”’ (c. 2015), www.engender.org.uk/content/publications/Joint-statement-on-Scotland-Bill—NC56—Abortion.pdf [no longer available].Google Scholar

Enright, Máiréad, McNeilly, Kathryn, and de Londras, Fiona, ‘Abortion Activism, Legal Change, and Taking Feminist Law Work Seriously’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, vol. 71 no. 3 (2020), 359–85.Google Scholar

Evangelical Alliance, ‘Question Time’ (2015), www.eauk.org/idea/question-time.cfmGoogle Scholar

Evason, Eileen, Against the Grain: The Contemporary Women’s Movement in Northern Ireland (Dublin: Attic, 1991).Google Scholar

Fairweather, Eileen, ‘The Feelings behind the Slogans’, Spare Rib, no. 87 (1979), 26–30.Google Scholar

Fairweather, Eileen, McDonough, Roisín, and McFadyean, Melanie, Only the Rivers Run Free: Northern Ireland: The Women’s War (London: Pluto, 1984).Google Scholar

Farmer, Ann, ‘Abortion: Woman’s Right or Body Parts Industry?’, Catholic Medical Quarterly, vol. 64 no. 1 (2014), www.cmq.org.uk/CMQ/2014/Feb/abortion_body_parts.htmlGoogle Scholar

Farmer, Ann, By Their Fruits: Eugenics, Population Control and the Abortion Campaign (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Ferris, Paul, The Nameless: Abortion in Britain Today (London: Penguin, 1966).Google Scholar

Fiala, Christian and Arthur, Joyce H., ‘There Is No Defence for “Conscientious Objection” in Reproductive Health Care’, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 216 (2017), 254–58.Google Scholar

Fine, Alan, ‘The Ethics of Fetal Tissue Transplants’, The Hastings Center Report, vol. 18 no. 3 (1988), 5–8.Google Scholar

Fisher, Jane, ‘Post-24 Week Termination for Fetal Anomaly – The Chilling Effect of the Jepson Campaign’ in BPAS, Britain’s Abortion Law: What It Says, and Why (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2013), pp. 28–29.Google Scholar

Flynn, Paul, How to Be an MP (London: Biteback Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar

Fowkes, F. G. R., Catford, J. C., and Logan, R. F. L., ‘Abortion and the NHS: The First Decade’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1 no. 6158 (1979), 217–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

FPANI, Northern Ireland Women’s European Platform, and Alliance for Choice, Submission of Evidence to the CEDAW Committee Optional Protocol: Inquiry Procedure, Transitional Justice Institute Research Paper No. 15-01 (Jordanstown: Ulster University, 2015).Google Scholar

Francome, Colin, ‘Gynaecologists and Abortion in Northern Ireland’, Journal of Biosocial Sciences, vol. 26 (1994), 389–94.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah, ‘Fetal Fascinations: New Dimensions to the Medical–Scientific Construction of Fetal Personhood’ in Franklin, Sarah, Lury, Celia, and Stacey, Jackie (eds), Off Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (London: Harper Collins, 1991), pp. 190–205.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah, Lury, Celia, and Stacey, Jackie (eds), Off Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (London: Harper Collins, 1991).Google Scholar

Freeman, Iris, Lord Denning: A Life (London: Hutchinson, 1993).Google Scholar

Friday, Adrian, ‘Charles Goodhart: A Twentieth Century Life’ (n.d.), www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/alumni/biographies-of-zoologists/charles-goodhart-a-twentieth-century-lifeGoogle Scholar

Furedi, Ann, ‘Our 10-Year Struggle to Improve Abortion Care’, Abortion Review, vol. 34 (2011), 1.Google Scholar

Furedi, Ann, The Moral Case for Abortion (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar

Galligan, Yvonne, ‘Women in Northern Ireland’s Politics: Feminising an “Armed Patriarchy”’ in Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda (eds), Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 204–20.Google Scholar

Gallup, ‘Abortion’ (2019), https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspxGoogle Scholar

Gammeltoft, Tine M. and Wahlberg, Ayo, ‘Selective Reproductive Technologies’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 43 (2014), 201–16.Google Scholar

Ganatra, Bela, Gerdts, Caitlin, Rossier, Clémentine, Johnson, Brooke Ronald Jr, Tuncalp, Özge, Assifi, Anisa, Sedgh, Gilda, Singh, Susheela, Bankole, Akinrinola, Popinchalk, Anna, Bearak, Jonathan, Kang, Zhenning, and Alkema, Leontine, ‘Global, Regional, and Subregional Classification of Abortions by Safety, 2010–14: Estimates from a Bayesian Hierarchical Model’, Lancet, vol. 390 no. 10110 (2017), 2372–81.Google Scholar

Gardner, Greg, ‘Abortion and Breast Cancer – Is There a Link?’ Triple Helix (2003), www.cmf.org.uk/resources/publications/content/?context=article&id=1088Google Scholar

Geiringer, David, The Pope and the Pill: Sex, Catholicism and Women in Post-War England (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

General Synod of the Church of England, ‘Valuing People with Down’s Syndrome’, GS 2088 (2018), www.churchofengland.org/sites/default/files/2018-01/GS%202088%20-%20Valuing%20People%20with%20Down%27s%20Syndrome.pdfGoogle Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, The Transformation of Intimacy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gill, Robin, Theology Shaped by Society (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar

Gillings, Mark and Pollard, Joshua, ‘Non-portable Stone Artifacts and Contexts of Meaning’, World Archaeology, vol. 31 no. 2 (1999), 179–93.Google Scholar

Gillon, Raanon, ‘Ethics of Fetal Brain Cell Transplants’, British Medical Journal, vol. 296 no. 6631 (1988), 1212–13.Google Scholar

Glazebrook, P. R., ‘Glanville Llewelyn Williams 1911–1997’, Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 115 (2002), 411–35.Google Scholar

Go, Attie T. J. I., van Vugt, John M. G., and Oudejans, Cees B. M., ‘Non-invasive Aneuploidy Detection Using Free Fetal DNA and RNA in Maternal Plasma: Recent Progress and Future Possibilities’, Human Reproduction Update vol. 17 no. 3 (2011), 372–82.Google Scholar

Goldthorp, W. O., ‘Ten Minute Abortions’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 6086 (1977), 562–64.Google Scholar

Gordon, Gerald, The Criminal Law of Scotland (Edinburgh: W. Green & Son, 1967).Google Scholar

Gosden, Chris and Marshall, Yvonne, ‘The Cultural Biography of Objects’, World Archaeology, vol. 31 no. 2 (1999), 169–78.Google Scholar

Government Equalities Office, ‘New Commissioner for the Equality and Human Rights Commission’ (2017), www.gov.uk/government/news/new-commissioner-for-the-equality-and-human-rights-commissionGoogle Scholar

Government of the UK, ‘Temporary Approval of Home Use for Both Stages of Early Medical Abortion’ (2020), www.gov.uk/government/publications/temporary-approval-of-home-use-for-both-stages-of-early-medical-abortion [no longer available].Google Scholar

Gray, Ann-Marie, ‘Attitudes to Abortion in Northern Ireland’ (2017), www.ark.ac.uk/publications/updates/update115.pdf [no longer available].Google Scholar

Gray, Ann-Marie, Horgan, Goretti, and Devine, Paula, ‘Do Social Attitudes to Abortion Suggest Political Parties in Northern Ireland Are Out of Step with Their Supporters?’ (2018), www.ark.ac.uk/pdfs/Features/feature7.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gray, Ann-Marie and Wellings, Kaye, ‘Is Public Opinion in Support of Decriminalisation?’ in Sheldon, Sally and Wellings, Kaye (eds), Decriminalising Abortion in the UK: What Would It Mean? (Bristol: Policy Press, 2020), pp. 17–36.Google Scholar

Green, Josephine M., ‘Obstetricians’ Views on Prenatal Diagnosis and Termination of Pregnancy: 1980 Compared with 1993’, British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 102 no. 3 (1995), 228–32.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Victoria and Young, Jock, Abortion in Demand (London: Pluto, 1976).Google Scholar

Gugenheim, Peter S. and Chandler, Barbara M., ‘Medical Examination of Patients Attending Registered Pregnancy Advice Bureaux’, Lancet, vol. 320 no. 8295 (1982), 436.Google Scholar

Gunn, M. J. and Smith, J. C., ‘Arthur’s Case and the Right to Life of a Down Syndrome Child’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1985 (1985), 705–15.Google Scholar

Hadley, Janet, Abortion: Between Freedom and Necessity (London: Virago, 1997).Google Scholar

Hadley, Janet, ‘The “Awfulisation” of Abortion’, Choices, vol. 26 no. 1 (1997), 7–8.Google Scholar

Halfmann, Drew, Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Hall, Lesley, Sex, Gender and Social Change in Britain since 1880 (London: Macmillan, 2000).Google Scholar

Hallgarten, Lisa, ‘Abortion Narratives: Moving from Statistics to Stories’, Lancet, vol. 391 no. 10134 (2018), 1988–89.Google Scholar

Ham, Christopher, Health Policy in Britain: The Politics and Organisation of the National Health Service (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 4th edition, 1999).Google Scholar

Hamet, Camille and Robin, Serena, ‘Take the Boat’ (2015), https://m.imdb.com/title/tt4948196/Google Scholar

Hamill, Evelyn and Ingram, I. M., ‘Psychiatric and Social Factors in the Abortion Decision’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1 no. 5901 (1974), 229–32.Google Scholar

Han, Sallie, ‘Pregnant with Ideas: Concepts of the Fetus in the Twenty-First-Century United States’ in Han, Sallie, Betsinger, Tracy K., and Scott, Amy B. (eds), The Anthropology of the Fetus: Biology, Culture and Society (New York and Oxford: Berghahn, 2018), pp. 59–82.Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol and Rawlings, Richard, Pressure through Law (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Harrington, John, ‘Of Paradox and Plausibility: The Dynamic of Change in Medical Law’, Medical Law Review, vol. 22 no. 3 (2014), 305–24.Google Scholar

Harrington, John, Towards a Rhetoric of Medical Law (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar

Harrington, John, Series, Lucy, and Ruck-Keene, Alexander, ‘Law and Rhetoric: Critical Possibilities’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 42 no. 2 (2019), 302–27.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., ‘Abortion Law Reform: The English Experience’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 8 no. 3 (1972), 388–411.Google Scholar

Hayes, Graeme and Lowe, Pam, ‘“A Hard Enough Decision to Make”: Anti-Abortion Activism outside Clinics in the Eyes of Clinic Users, A Report on the Comments Made by BPAS Services Users’ (2015), www.aston.ac.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=256682Google Scholar

Hayward, Katy and McManus, Cathal, ‘Neither/Nor: The Rejection of Unionist and Nationalist Identities in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland’, Class and Capital, vol. 43 no. 1 (2019), 139–55.Google Scholar

Hervey, Tamara and Sheldon, Sally, ‘Abortion by Telemedicine in Northern Ireland: Patient and Professional Rights to Free Movement across Borders’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, vol. 68 no. 1 (2017), 1–33.Google Scholar

HESA, ‘Higher Education Student Statistics: UK, 2019/20’ (2021), www.hesa.ac.uk/news/27-01-2021/sb258-higher-education-student-statisticsGoogle Scholar

Hewson, Barbara, ‘Clinical Negligence: Denied Access’, Legal Week (7 December 2005).Google Scholar

HFEA, Donated Ovarian Tissue in Embryo Research and Assisted Conception: Public Consultation Document (London: HFEA, 1994).Google Scholar

Hill, Myrtle, Women in Ireland: A Century of Change (Belfast: Blackstaff Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Hindell, Keith, A Gilded Vagabond (Brighton: Book Guild Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar

Hindell, Keith and Simms, Madeleine, Abortion Law Reformed (London: Peter Owen, 1971).Google Scholar

Hodges, Mark, ‘UK Is Paying an Abortion Activist $600K+ to Write a Book about Abortion for Children’ (2017), www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-oks-600k-for-womens-activist-to-write-abortion-textbook-for-schoolkidsGoogle Scholar

Hoggart, Lesley, ‘Socialist Feminism, Reproductive Rights and Political Action’, Capital & Class, vol. 24 no. 1 (2000), 95–125.Google Scholar

Hoggart, Lesley, Newton, Victoria Louise, and Bury, Louise, ‘“Repeat Abortion”: A Phrase to be Avoided? Qualitative Insights into Labelling and Stigma’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 43 no. 1 (2017), 26–30.Google Scholar

Hoggett, A. J. C., ‘The Abortion Act 1967’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1968 (1968), 247–58.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Nick, Reicher, Steve, and Saleem, Jannat, ‘Constructing Women’s Psychological Health in Anti-Abortion Rhetoric’, The Sociological Review, vol. 44 no. 3 (1996), 539–64.Google Scholar

Hordern, Anthony, Legal Abortion: The English Experience (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Horgan, Goretti, ‘A Holy Alliance? Obstacles to Abortion Rights in Ireland North and South’ in Quilty, Aideen, Kennedy, Sinead, and Conlon, Catherine (eds), The Abortion Papers Ireland Vol. II (Dublin: Attic Press, 2015), pp. 244–55.Google Scholar

Horgan, Goretti and O’Connor, Julia S., ‘Abortion and Citizenship Rights in a Devolved Region of the UK’, Social Policy and Society, vol. 13 no. 1 (2014), 39–49.Google Scholar

Horobin, Gordon, Experience with Abortion: A Case Study of North-East Scotland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

House of Commons, First Report from the Select Committee on Abortion, 1975–1976, Vol. 1: Report, HC 573-I (1976).Google Scholar

House of Commons, Special Reports and Minutes of Evidence of the Select Committee on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill, 1974–1975, HC 692-II (1975).Google Scholar

House of Commons Committee on Standards, All-Party Parliamentary Groups Sixth Report of Session 2013–14, HC 357 (2013).Google Scholar

House of Commons Library, Women in Parliament and Government, Briefing Paper Number 01250 (2019).Google Scholar

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law: Fifth Report of Session 2004-5, HC7-I (2005).Google Scholar

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967: Twelfth Report of Session 2006–7, Vol. 1, HC 1045-I (2007).Google Scholar

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967: Twelfth Report of Session 2006–7, Vol. 2, HC 1045-II (2007).Google Scholar

House of Commons Social Services Committee, Abortion Act 1967 ‘Conscience Clause’, Tenth Report, HC 123 (1990).Google Scholar

House of Commons Standing Committee C, Minutes of Proceedings on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill, HC 494 (1977).Google Scholar

House of Commons Standing Committee C, Minutes of Proceedings on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill (1979).Google Scholar

House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee, Abortion Law in Northern Ireland, Eighth Report of Session 2017–19, HC 1584 (2019).Google Scholar

House of Lords, Report of the Select Committee on the Infant Life (Preservation) Bill [H.L.], HL 50 (1987–1988).Google Scholar

House of Lords, Special Report with Evidence of the Select Committee on the Infant Life (Preservation) Bill [HL], HL 153 (1986–1987).Google Scholar

Human Developmental Biology Resource, ‘General Information’ (n.d.), www.hdbr.org/general-informationGoogle Scholar

Humanists UK, ‘Anti-Abortion Activist Resigns as Equality and Human Rights Commissioner’ (2017), https://humanism.org.uk/2017/12/13/anti-abortion-activist-resigns-as-equality-and-human-rights-commissioner/Google Scholar

Huntingford, Peter, ‘The Failure of the NHS: Why the Public & the NHS Need the Charities’ in Birth Control Trust (ed.), Abortion: The NHS and the Charities, A Symposium (London: Birth Control Trust, 1977), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar

ICM Unlimited, Abortion Documentary Survey (2017), www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/OlOm-Abortion-Documentary-v2.pdfGoogle Scholar

Informing Choices NI, Strategic Plan 2020–2023 (Belfast: Informing Choices NI, 2020), https://informingchoicesni.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ICNI-STRATEGIC-PLAN-20-23.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ingram, I. M., ‘Abortion Games: An Inquiry into the Working of the Act’, Lancet, vol. 298 no. 7731 (1971), 969–70.Google Scholar

Irish Catholic, ‘Nuala O’Loan’ (2021), www.irishcatholic.com/author/nualaoloan/Google Scholar

Jackson, Lucy and Valentine, Gill, ‘Performing “Moral Resistance”? Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Activism in Public Space’, Space and Culture, vol. 20 no. 2 (2017), 225–31.Google Scholar

Jamieson, Lynn, ‘Changing Intimacy: Seeking and Forming Couple Relationships’ in Abrams, Lynn and Brown, Callum G. (eds), A History of Everyday Life in Twentieth-Century Scotland (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010), pp. 76–102.Google Scholar

Jelen, Ted G. and Wilcox, Clyde, ‘Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda’, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 56 no. 4 (2003), 489–500.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Alice, Law for the Rich: A Plea for the Reform of the Abortion Law (London: Victor Gollancz, 1960).Google Scholar

Jepson, Joanna, ‘The Empty Hanger’, www.emptyhanger.co.uk/ [no longer available].Google Scholar

Jolly, Margaretta, ‘“The Feelings behind the Slogans”: Abortion Campaigning and Feminist Mood-Work Circa 1979’, New Formations, vol. 82 no.1 (2014), 100–13.Google Scholar

Jones, Cecily, ‘“Human Weeds, Not Fit to Breed?”: African Caribbean Women and Reproductive Disparities in Britain’, Critical Public Health, vol. 23 no. 1 (2013), 49–61.Google Scholar

Jones, Ian, ‘Setting Up Services’ in Furedi, Ann (ed.), Mifepristone in Practice. Running an Early Medical Abortion Service, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 22 April 1993 at the Royal Society of Medicine (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 19–23.Google Scholar

Jülich, Solveig, ‘Lennart Nilsson’s Child Is Born: The Many Lives of a Best-Selling Pregnancy Advice Book’, Culture Unbound, Journal of Current Cultural Research, vol. 7 no. 4 (2015), 627–48.Google Scholar

Kasstan, Ben and Unnithan, Maya, ‘Arbitrating Abortion: Sex-Selection and Care Work among Abortion Providers in England’, Medical Anthropology, vol. 39 no. 6 (2020), 491–505.Google Scholar

Katz Rothman, Barbara, The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood (London: Pandora, 2nd edition, 1993).Google Scholar

Kelly, Richard, ‘Women Members of Parliament’, House of Commons Research Briefing (2019), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn066520/Google Scholar

Kennedy, Ian and Grubb, Andrew, Medical Law (London: Butterworths, 3rd edition, 2000).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Steven, ‘Two Child Limit in Universal Credit and Child Tax Credits’, House of Commons Research Briefing (2018), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2018-0263/Google Scholar

Keown, John, ‘“Miscarriage”: A Medico-Legal Analysis’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1984 (1984), 604–14.Google Scholar

Keown, John, Abortion, Doctors and the Law: Some Aspects of the Legal Regulation of Abortion in England from 1803 to 1982 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Keown, John, ‘“Morning After” Pills, “Miscarriage” and Muddle’, Legal Studies, vol. 25 no. 2 (2005), 296–319.Google Scholar

Kerslake, D. and Casey, D., ‘Abortion Induced by Means of the Uterine Aspirator’, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 30 no. 1 (1967), 35–45.Google Scholar

Kilday, Anne-Marie and Nash, David, ‘The Silent Scream of Shame? Abortion in Modern Britain’ in Kilday, Anne-Marie and Nash, David (eds), Shame and Modernity in Britain: 1890 to the Present (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 115–67.Google Scholar

Kind to Women, ‘How the 1967 Abortion Act Changes Our Lives’ (2018), www.kindtowomen.com/Google Scholar

Kirklin, Deborah, ‘The Role of Medical Imaging in the Abortion Debate’, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 30 no. 5 (2004), 426.Google Scholar

Klein, Renate, Raymond, Janice G., and Dumble, Lynette, RU 486: Misconceptions, Myths and Morals (Melbourne: Spinifex, 1991).Google Scholar

Knight, Marian, Bunch, Kathryn, Tuffnell, Derek, Shakespeare, Judy, Kotnis, Rohit, Kenyon, Sara, and Kurinczuk, Jennifer J. (eds), Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2016–18 (Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2020).Google Scholar

Kopytoff, Igor, ‘The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process’ in Appadurai, Arjun (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 64–92.Google Scholar

Labour Party, ‘It’s Time for Real Change: The Labour Party Manifesto 2019’ (2019), https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Real-Change-Labour-Manifesto-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar

Labour Party, Report of the 74th Annual Conference of the Labour Party (Blackpool: Labour Party, 1975).Google Scholar

Lafitte, Francois, ‘How the Charities Fill the Gap’ in Birth Control Trust, Abortion: The NHS and the Charities, A Symposium (London: Birth Control Trust, 1977), pp. 9–12.Google Scholar

Lafitte, Francois, The Abortion Hurdle Race: The Role of the Doctor as a Taker of Abortion Decisions (Solihull: BPAS, 1975).Google Scholar

Lane, Elizabeth, Hear the Other Side (London: Butterworths, 1985).Google Scholar

Lane, Elizabeth (Chair), Report of the Committee on the Working of the Abortion Act (Lane Report), Cmnd. 5579 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1974).Google Scholar

Lawson, J. B., Yare, D., Barron, S. L., Querido, A. M. E., and Phillips, P. R., ‘Management of the Abortion Problem in an English City’, Lancet, vol. 308 no. 7998 (1976), 1288–91.Google Scholar

Lawson, Nigel, The View from No. 11: Memoirs of a Tory Radical (London: Bantam, 1992).Google Scholar

Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship, ‘Mission & Vision’ (2021), https://lawcf.org/about/mission-visionGoogle Scholar

Lee, Ellie, Abortion, Motherhood and Mental Health: Medicalizing Reproduction in the United States and Great Britain (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2003).Google Scholar

Lee, Ellie, ‘Constructing Abortion as a Social Problem: “Sex Selection” and the British Abortion Debate’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 27 no. 1 (2017), 15–33.Google Scholar

Lee, Ellie, ‘The Trouble with “Smiling” Fetuses’ (2003), www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/ocr_ethical_iss_1.phpGoogle Scholar

Lee, Ellie, ‘Young Women, Pregnancy, and Abortion in Britain: A Discussion of “Law in Practice”’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 18 no. 3 (2004), 283–304.Google Scholar

Lewis, Jane, Women in Britain since 1945 (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Lewis, T. R. T., ‘The Abortion Act’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1 no. 5638 (1969), 241–42.Google Scholar

Lewis, T. R. T., ‘The Abortion Act (1967): Findings of an Inquiry into the First Year’s Working of the Act Conducted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5708 (1970), 529–35.Google Scholar

Liberal Democrats, ‘Stop Brexit, Build a Brighter Future: Manifesto 2019’ (2019), https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/libdems/pages/57333/attachments/original/1574258742/Lib_Dem_Manifesto_2019.pdf?1574258742Google Scholar

Litchfield, Michael and Kentish, Susan, Babies for Burning (London: Serpentine, 1974).Google Scholar

Liverpool Museums, ‘Coming Out’ (2017), www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/walker/exhibitions/arts-council-collection/coming-out/index.aspx [no longer available].Google Scholar

Lohr, Patricia A., Starling, Jennifer E., Scott, James G., and Aiken, Abigail R. A., ‘Simultaneous Compared with Interval Medical Abortion Regimens Where Home Use Is Restricted’, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 131 no. 4 (2018), 635–41.Google Scholar

Lord, Jonathan M., Regan, Lesley, Kasliwal, Asha, Massey, Louise, and Cameron, Sharon, ‘Early Medical Abortion’, BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 44 no. 3 (2018), 155–58.Google Scholar

Lovenduski, Joni, ‘Parliament, Pressure Groups, Networks and the Women’s Movement: The Politics of Abortion Law Reform in Britain (1967–83)’ in Lovenduski, Joni and Outshoorn, Joyce (eds), The New Politics of Abortion (London: Sage, 1986), pp. 231–56.Google Scholar

Lowe, Pam, ‘(Re)imagining the “Backstreet”: Anti-Abortion Campaigning Against Decriminalisation in the UK’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 24 no. 2 (2019), 203–18.Google Scholar

Lowe, Pam and Hayes, Graeme, ‘Anti-Abortion Clinic Activism, Civil Inattention and the Problem of Gendered Harassment’, Sociology, vol. 53 no. 2 (2019), 330–46.Google Scholar

Lowe, Pam and Page, Sarah-Jane, ‘“On the Wet Side of the Womb”: The Construction of “Mothers” in Anti-Abortion Activism in England and Wales’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 26 no. 2 (2019), 165–80.Google Scholar

Lowe, Pam and Page, Sarah-Jane, ‘Rights-Based Claims Made by UK Anti-Abortion Activists’, Health and Human Rights, vol. 21 no. 2 (2019), 133–44.Google Scholar

Löwy, Ilana, ‘Prenatal Diagnosis, Surveillance and Risk’ in Hopwood, Nick, Flemming, Rebecca, and Kassell, Lauren (eds), Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 567–80.Google Scholar

Löwy, Ilana, ‘Prenatal Diagnosis: The Irresistible Rise of the “Visible Foetus”’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 47 part B (2014), 290–99.Google Scholar

Lupton, Deborah, The Social Worlds of the Unborn (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2013).Google Scholar

Macintyre, Sally, Single and Pregnant (London: Croom Helm, 1977).Google Scholar

MacLeod, Harris, ‘82% Aware of Mad Nad’ (2012), https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2012/11/23/82-aware-mad-nadGoogle Scholar

Mansour, Diana and Stacey, Linda, ‘Abortion Methods’ in Paintin, David (ed.), Abortion Services in England and Wales (London: BCT and PAS, 1990), pp. 29–38.Google Scholar

Marsh, David and Chambers, Joanna, Abortion Politics (London: Junction Books, 1981).Google Scholar

Marshall, Kate, Real Freedom (London: Junius, 1982).Google Scholar

Marteau, Theresa M. and Drake, Harriet, ‘Attributions for Disability: The Influence of Genetic Screening’, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 40 no. 8 (1995), 1127–32.Google Scholar

McAnulla, Stuart, ‘Secular Fundamentalists? Characterising the New Atheist Approach to Secularism, Religion and Politics’, British Politics, vol. 9 no. 2 (2014), 124–45.Google Scholar

McCormick, Leanne, ‘“No Sense of Wrongdoing”: Abortion in Belfast 1917–1967’, Journal of Social History, vol. 49 no. 1 (2015), 125–48.Google Scholar

McCormick, Leanne, Regulating Sexuality: Women in Twentieth-Century Northern Ireland (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

McCormick, Leanne, ‘“The Scarlet Woman in Person”: The Establishment of a Family Planning Service in Northern Ireland, 1950–1974’, Social History of Medicine, vol. 21 no. 2 (2008), 345–60.Google Scholar

McCormick, Leanne and O’Connell, Sean with Dee, Olivia and Privilege, John, Mother and Baby Homes and Magdalene Laundries in Northern Ireland, 1922–1990 (Belfast: Northern Ireland Department of Health, 2021).Google Scholar

McCullagh, Peter, Fetal Sentience (London: All-Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group, 1996).Google Scholar

McGivern, Marie-Thérèse, Abortion in Northern Ireland (1980) reprinted in Bourke, Angela, Kilfeather, Siobhán, Luddy, Maria, Mac Curtain, Margaret, Meaney, Gerardine, Ni Dhonnchadha, Máirín, O’Dowd, Mary, and Wills, Clair (eds), The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing Volume V: Irish Women’s Writing and Traditions (Cork: Cork University Press and Field Day, 2002), pp. 390–91.Google Scholar

McGrane, F. and Nicholls, J., ‘Tribunal on Abortion Rights’, Spare Rib, no. 56 (1977), 26–27.Google Scholar

McGuinness, Sheelagh, ‘A Guerrilla Strategy for a Pro-Life England’, Law, Innovation and Technology, vol. 7 no. 2 (2015), 283–314.Google Scholar

McGuinness, Sheelagh and Thomson, Michael, ‘Medicine and Abortion Law: Complicating the Reforming Profession’, Medical Law Review, vol. 23 no. 2 (2015), 177–99.Google Scholar

McLaren, Hugh, ‘The Abortion Bill’, Lancet, vol. 289 no. 7489 (1967), 565–66.Google Scholar

McNay, M. B. and Fleming, J. E., ‘Forty Years of Obstetric Ultrasound 1957–97’, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 25 no. 1 (1999), 3–56.Google Scholar

Medical Protection Society, The Abortion Act 1967: Proceedings of a Symposium Held by the Medical Protection Society, in Collaboration with the RCGP at the RCOG (London: Pitman, 1969).Google Scholar

Millar, Erica, Happy Abortions: Our Bodies in the Era of Choice (London: Zed Books, 2017).Google Scholar

Ministry of Truth, ‘The Anti-Abortion Lobby’s Sham Parliamentary Inquiry’ (2013), www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2013/03/06/the-anti-abortion-lobbys-sham-parliamentary-inquiry/Google Scholar

Mohler, Albert, ‘Carnage in the Womb: An Abortion Scandal Rocks Britain’ (2004), https://albertmohler.com/2004/10/18/carnage-in-the-womb-an-abortion-scandal-rocks-britain/Google Scholar

Montgomery, Jonathan, ‘Conscientious Objection: Personal and Professional Ethics in the Public Square’, Medical Law Review, vol. 23 no. 2 (2015), 200–20.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Jonathan, ‘Doctors’ Handmaidens: The Legal Contribution’ in McVeigh, Shaun and Wheeler, Sally (eds), Law, Health and Medical Regulation (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1992).Google Scholar

Montgomery, Jonathan, ‘Law and the Demoralisation of Medicine’, Legal Studies, vol. 26 no. 2 (2006), 185–210.Google Scholar

Moon, David S., Thompson, Jennifer, and Whiting, Sophie, ‘Lost in the Process? The Impact of Devolution on Abortion Law in the United Kingdom’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 21 no. 4 (2019), 728–45.Google Scholar

Moorehead, J., ‘Boycott Call for Abortion Pill Firm's Products’ in National Abortion Campaign (ed.), RU486: A Collection of Articles and Press Cuttings on the ‘Abortion Pill’ (London: National Abortion Campaign, n.d.).Google Scholar

Morgan, Lynn M., ‘Properly Disposed of: A History of Embryo Disposal and the Changing Claims on Fetal Remains’, Medical Anthropology, vol. 21 no. 3–4 (2002), 247–74.Google Scholar

Morris, Anne E. and Jones, M. A., Blackstone’s Statutes on Medical Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10th edition, 2019).Google Scholar

Morrow, James, ‘A Constitutional Right to Rescue Unborn Children’ (1994), www.humanae-vitae.org/leaflets/constitutional.htmlGoogle Scholar

MSI Reproductive Choices, ‘Our History’ (2020), www.msichoices.org/about-us/our-history/Google Scholar

Mukherjee, Siddhartha, The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer (London: Fourth Estate, 2011).Google Scholar

Mulcahy, Linda and Sugarman, David, ‘Introduction: Legal Life Writing and Marginalized Subjects and Sources’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 42 no. 1 (2015), 1–6.Google Scholar

Mulkay, Michael, The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Munday, Diane, ‘The Development of Abortion Services since 1968’ in Birth Control Trust and Pregnancy Advisory Service (eds), Abortion Services in England and Wales (London: Birth Control Trust, 1994), 7–16.Google Scholar

Munday, Diane, untitled presentation at Abortion Act 1967 Conference: A Promise Fulfilled? Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 24–25 October 2017.Google Scholar

NAC (ed.), A Celebration of 25 Years of Safe, Legal Abortion 1967–1992 (London: NAC, 1992).Google Scholar

National Archives, ‘1967 Sexual Offences Act: 50 Years On’ (2017), https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/1967-sexual-offences-act-50-years-lgbt-history/Google Scholar

National Centre for Social Research, British Social Attitudes, no. 34 (2017), www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-34/key-findings/context.aspxGoogle Scholar

Nelken, David, The Limits of the Legal Process: A Study of Landlords, Law and Crime (London: Academic Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Neustatter, Andrew and Newson, Gina, Mixed Feelings: The Experience of Abortion (London: Pluto, 1986).Google Scholar

Neustatter, P. L., ‘Participation of Nurses in Abortions’, Lancet, vol. 316 no. 8205 (1980) 1199–200.Google Scholar

NIALRA, Abortion in Northern Ireland: The Report of an International Tribunal (Belfast: Beyond the Pale Publications, 1989).Google Scholar

NICE and RCOG, ‘Abortion Care. NICE Guideline [NG140]’ (2019) www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng140Google Scholar

NIHRC, ‘2021 Fact Sheet: Human Rights Commission Legal Action on Lack of Abortion Services in NI’ (2021), www.nihrc.org/uploads/publications/11.01.21_Fact_Sheet_Human_Rights_Commission_Legal_Action_on_Lack_of_Abortion_Services_in_NI_.pdfGoogle Scholar

Northern Ireland Office, A New Legal Framework for Abortion Services in Northern Ireland (London: Northern Ireland Office, 2019).Google Scholar

Nuffield Council on Bioethics, ‘Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Ethical Issues’ (2017), www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/NIPT-ethical-issues-full-report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ofcom, ‘Ofcom Broadcast and on Demand Bulletin’, no. 330 (2017), www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/102567/issue-330-broadcast-on-demand-bulletin.pdfGoogle Scholar

Office for National Statistics, ‘Birth Characteristics in England and Wales: 2019’ (2020), www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2019Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics, ‘Childbearing for Women Born in Different Years, England and Wales: 2019’ (2020), www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/conceptionandfertilityrates/bulletins/childbearingforwomenbornindifferentyearsenglandandwales/2019Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics, ‘Marriages in England and Wales: 2017’ (2020), www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/marriagecohabitationandcivilpartnerships/bulletins/marriagesinenglandandwalesprovisional/2017Google Scholar

Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse, ‘The Feminist Appropriation of Pregnancy Testing in 1970s Britain’, Women’s History Review, vol. 28 no. 6 (2019), 869–94.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Jane, ‘“Abortion Games”: The Negotiation of Termination Decisions in Post-1967 Britain’, History, vol. 104 no. 359 (2019), 169–88.Google Scholar

O’Neill, P. T. and Watson, Isobel, ‘The Father and the Unborn Child’, Modern Law Review, vol. 38 no. 2 (1975), 174–85.Google Scholar

Ormrod, Roger, ‘A Lawyer Looks at Medical Ethics’, Medico-Legal Journal, vol. 46 no. 1 (1978), 18–32.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Catherine, ‘Advocating Abortion Rights in Northern Ireland: Local and Global Tensions’, Social and Legal Studies, vol. 25 no. 6 (2016), 716–40.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Catherine, ‘Bridging the Enforcement Gap? Evaluating the Inquiry Procedure of the CEDAW Optional Protocol’, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, vol. 27 no. 1 (2019), 1–30.Google Scholar

Orr, Judith, Abortion Wars: The Fight for Reproductive Rights (Bristol: Policy Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Owen, David, Personally Speaking to Kenneth Harris (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1987).Google Scholar

Owen, David, Time to Declare (London: Michael Joseph, 1991).Google Scholar

Paintin, David, Abortion Law Reform in Britain 1964–2003: A Personal Account (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2015).Google Scholar

Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, ‘Guide to the Rules on All-Party Parliamentary Groups’ (2015), www.parliament.uk/documents/pcfs/all-party-groups/guide-to-the-rules-on-appgs.pdfGoogle Scholar

Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, ‘Rectification’ (2016), www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/pcfs/rectifications/ms-fiona-bruce-rectification.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pattie, Charles, Johnston, Ron, and Stuart, Mark, ‘Voting without Party?’ in Cowley, Philip (ed.), Conscience and Parliament (London: Frank Cass 1998), pp. 146–76.Google Scholar

Pearl, David and Grubb, Andrew, ‘Protecting the Life of the Unborn Child’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 103 (1987), 340–46.Google Scholar

Sir Peel, John, Unplanned Pregnancy: Report of a Working Party of the RCOG (London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1972).Google Scholar

Sir Pereira Gray, Denis, ‘The Lane Committee’, presentation at Abortion Act 1967 Conference: A Promise Fulfilled? Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 24–25 October 2017.Google Scholar

Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack, ‘Fetal Images: The Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction’, Feminist Studies, vol. 13 no. 2 (1987), 263–92.Google Scholar

Pierson, Claire and Bloomer, Fiona, ‘Anti-Abortion Myths in Political Discourse’ in MacQuarrie, Colleen, Bloomer, Fiona, Pierson, Claire, and Stettner, Shannon (eds), Crossing Troubled Waters: Abortion in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Prince Edward Island (Prince Edward Island: Island Studies Press, 2018), pp. 184–203.Google Scholar

Pipes, Mary, Understanding Abortion (London: The Women’s Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Polkinghorne, John (Chair), Review of the Guidance on the Research Use of Fetuses and Fetal Material (Polkinghorne Report), CM 762 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1989).Google Scholar

Pollitt, Katha, Pro: Reclaiming Abortion Rights (New York: Picador, 2015).Google Scholar

Pope, Paul VI, ‘Humane Vitae’ (1968), www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.htmlGoogle Scholar

Potts, Malcolm, Diggory, Peter, and Peel, John, Abortion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Priaulx, Nicky, ‘Pro-Life Inquiries: When Is a Parliamentary Inquiry Really a Parliamentary Inquiry?’ (2016), https://lawyersforchoice.wordpress.com/page/2/Google Scholar

Priest, R. G., ‘The Impact of the Abortion Act: A Psychiatrist’s Observations’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 121 no. 562 (1972), 293–99.Google Scholar

Prior, James, A Balance of Power (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1986).Google Scholar

Proctor, Robert N. and Schiebinger, Londa L. (eds), Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Purcell, Carrie, Cameron, Sharon, Caird, Lucy, Flett, Gillian, Laird, George, Melville, Catriona, and McDaid, Lisa M., ‘Access to and Experience of Later Abortion: Accounts from Women in Scotland’, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 46 no. 2 (2014), 101–08.Google Scholar

Rawlinson, Peter, Human Sentience Before Birth: Rawlinson Report (London: CARE, 1996).Google Scholar

Rawlinson, Peter, The Physical and Psycho-Social Effects of Abortion on Women: A Report by the Commission on Inquiry into the Operation and Consequences of the Abortion Act (London: CARE, 1994).Google Scholar

RCGP, ‘RCGP to Support Decriminalisation of Abortion’ (2019), www.rcgp.org.uk/about-us/news/2019/february/rcgp-to-support-decriminalisation-of-abortion.aspxGoogle Scholar

RCN, ‘Decriminalisation of Termination of Pregnancy: A Position Statement’ (2018), www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/pub-007401Google Scholar

RCN, Response of the Royal College of Nursing to a DHSSPS Consultation on the Limited Circumstances for a Lawful Termination of Pregnancy in Northern Ireland (Belfast: Royal College of Nursing, 2013).Google Scholar

RCOG, ‘Coronavirus (Covid-19) Infection and Abortion Care: Information for Healthcare Professionals’ (2020), www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2020-03-21-abortion-guidance.pdfGoogle Scholar

RCOG, ‘Fetal Awareness: Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice – Report of a Working Party’ (2010), www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/rcogfetalawarenesswpr0610.pdfGoogle Scholar

RCOG, ‘New Study Finds Telemedicine for Abortion Care is Safe and More Accessible’ (2021), www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/telemedicine-cohort-study-released/Google Scholar

RCOG, ‘RCOG Backs Decriminalisation of Abortion’ (2017), www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/rcog-backs-decriminalisation-of-abortion/Google Scholar

RCOG, Report on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Imposing an 18 Week Gestational Limit on Legal Abortion (London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1987).Google Scholar

RCOG, The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion (Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline No. 7) (London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2011).Google Scholar

Read, Melvyn D., ‘The Pro-Life Movement’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 51 no. 3 (1998), 445–57.Google Scholar

Reagan, Leslie, Dangerous Pregnancies: Mothers, Disabilities and Abortion in Modern America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Regan, Lesley, ‘Abortion: View from Westminster’, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 143 no. 2 (2018), 133-36.Google Scholar

Richards, Clare, A World without Down Syndrome? (BBC2, 2016), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07ycbj5Google Scholar

Right to Life, ‘Emergency’ (n.d.), https://righttolife.org.uk/emergency/ [no longer available].Google Scholar

Right to Life, ‘Medical Professionals Open Letter Regarding “Home” Abortion Schemes’ (2021), https://righttolife.org.uk/medicalletterGoogle Scholar

Roantree, Barra and Vira, Kartik, ‘The Rise and Rise of Women’s Employment in the UK’, Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note BN234 (2018), https://ifs.org.uk/uploads/BN234.pdfGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Dorothy, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty (New York: Vintage Books, 1999).Google Scholar

Roberts, Julie, The Visualised Foetus: A Cultural and Political Analysis of Ultrasound Imagery (Oxford: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Rossiter, Ann, Ireland’s Hidden Diaspora: The “Abortion Trail” and the Making of a London–Irish Underground 1980–2000 (London: IASC Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar

Rough, Elizabeth, ‘Abortion in Northern Ireland: Recent Changes to the Legal Framework’, House of Commons Library Research Briefing (2021), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8909/Google Scholar

Rowlands, Sam, ‘Day-Care Abortion in the NHS: A Survey of 12 Centres’, British Journal of Family Planning, vol. 5 (1979), 1–4.Google Scholar

Royal Society of Public Health, ‘Top 20 Public Health Achievements of the 21st Century’ (2019), www.rsph.org.uk/about-us/news/top-20-public-health-achievements-of-the-21st-century.htmlGoogle Scholar

Rozenberg, Joshua, The Case for the Crown: The Inside Story of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Wellingborough: Equation, 1987).Google Scholar

Sackar, Justice John, Lord Devlin (Oxford: Hart, 2020).Google Scholar

Sanger, Carol, About Abortion: Terminating Pregnancy in Twenty-First Century America (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Savage, Wendy, ‘Nurses and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy’, British Medical Journal, vol. 281 no. 6253 (1980), 1491.Google Scholar

Savell, Kristin L., ‘Life and Death before Birth: 4D Ultrasound and the Shifting Frontiers of the Abortion Debate’, Journal of Law and Medicine, vol. 15 no. 1 (2007), 103–16.Google Scholar

Scarisbrick, J. J., Let There Be Life (Leamington Spa: Life, 2007).Google Scholar

Science Media Centre, ‘Reaction to Evan Harris Losing His Parliamentary Seat’ (2010), www.sciencemediacentre.org/reaction-to-evan-harris-losing-his-parliamentary-seat-2/Google Scholar

Sclare, A. B. and Geraghty, B. P., ‘Termination of Pregnancy: The Nurse’s Attitude’, Nursing Mirror, vol. 140 no. 3 (1975), 59–60.Google Scholar

Scottish Trades Union Congress, Annual Report 1980 (Perth, TUC: 1980).Google Scholar

Sedgh, Gilda, Singh, Susheela, Shah, Iqbal H., Åhman, Elizabeth, Henshaw, Stanley K., and Bankole, Akinrinola, ‘Induced Abortions: Incidence and Trends Worldwide from 1995 to 2008’, Lancet, vol. 379 no. 9816 (2012), 625–32.Google Scholar

Sethna, Christabelle, ‘From Heathrow Airport to Harley Street: The ALRA and the Travel of Nonresident Women for Abortion Services in Britain’ in Sethna, Christabelle and Davis, Gayle (eds), Abortion across Borders: Transnational Travel and Access to Abortion Services (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), pp. 46–71.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, Tom, Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, ‘A Missed Opportunity to Reform an Outdated Piece of Legislation’, Clinical Ethics, vol. 4 no. 1 (2009), 3–5.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law (London: Pluto, 1997).Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, ‘British Abortion Law: Speaking from the Past to Govern the Future’, Modern Law Review, vol. 79 no. 2 (2016), 283–316.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, ‘Empowerment and Privacy? Home Use of Abortion Pills in the Republic of Ireland’, Signs, vol. 43 no. 4 (2018), 823–49.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, ‘Multiple Pregnancy and Re(pro)ductive Choice’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 5 (1997), 99–106.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, ‘The Decriminalisation of Abortion: An Argument for Modernisation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 36 no. 2 (2016), 334–65.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, ‘The Regulatory Cliff Edge between Contraception and Abortion: The Legal and Moral Significance of Implantation’, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 41 no. 9 (2015), 762–65.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, ‘“Who Is the Mother to Make the Judgment?”: Constructions of Woman in UK Abortion Law’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 1 no. 1 (1993), 3–22.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, Davis, Gayle, O’Neill, Jane, and Parker, Clare, ‘Sources’ (2021), https://research.kent.ac.uk/abortion-act/sources/Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally and Fletcher, Joanne, ‘Vacuum Aspiration for Induced Abortion Could be Safely and Legally Performed by Nurses and Midwives’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 43 (2017), 260–64.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally, O’Neill, Jane, Parker, Clare, and Davis, Gayle, ‘“Too Much, Too Indigestible, Too Fast”? The Decades of Struggle for Abortion Law Reform in Northern Ireland’, Modern Law Review, vol. 83 no. 4 (2020), 761–96.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally and Wellings, Kaye, Decriminalising Abortion in the UK (Bristol: Policy Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Sheldon, Sally and Kaye Wellings, ‘Introduction’ in Decriminalising Abortion in the UK (Bristol: Policy Press, 2020), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Siegel, Reva B., ‘Dignity and the Politics of Protection: Abortion Restrictions under Casey/Carhart’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 117 no. 8 (2008), 1694–800.Google Scholar

Siegel, Reva B., ‘The Right’s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Women-Protective Anti-abortion Argument’, Duke Law Journal, vol. 57 no. 6 (2008), 1641–92.Google Scholar

Silvestre, Louise, ‘The French Experiences’ in Williams, Cerys (ed.), The Abortion Pill (Mifepristone/RU486): Widening the Choice for Women, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 26 October 1989 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

Sim, Myre, ‘Abortion and the Psychiatrist’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5350 (1963), 145–48.Google Scholar

Simms, Madeleine, ‘Britain’ in Rolston, Bill and Eggert, Anna (eds), Abortion in the New Europe: A Comparative Handbook (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1990), pp. 31–42.Google Scholar

Simms, Madeleine, ‘Day-Care Abortion’, Lancet, vol. 315 no. 8180 (1980), 1253.Google Scholar

Simms, Madeleine, ‘Legal Abortion in Great Britain’ in Homans, Hilary (ed.), The Sexual Politics of Reproduction (Aldershot: Gower, 1985), pp. 78–95.Google Scholar

Simms, Madeleine, ‘The Great Foetus Mystery’, New Scientist (1970), 592.Google Scholar

Simpson, A., ‘The Victorian Law of Northern Ireland’, Planned Parenthood in Europe, vol. 22 no. 3 (1993), 7.Google Scholar

Sisson, Gretchen and Kimport, Katrina, ‘Telling Stories about Abortion: Abortion-Related Plots in American Film and Television, 1916–2013’, Contraception, vol. 89 no. 5 (2014), 413–18.Google Scholar

Smart, Carol and Neale, Bren, Family Fragments? (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Smith Commission, Report of the Smith Commission for Further Devolution of Powers to the Scottish Parliament (Edinburgh: Smith Commission, 2014).Google Scholar

Smith, J. C., ‘Abortion’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1981 (1981), 322–23.Google Scholar

Smyth, Lisa, ‘The Cultural Politics of Sexuality and Reproduction in Northern Ireland’, Sociology, vol. 40 no. 4 (2006), 663–80.Google Scholar

Solinger, Rickie, Pregnancy and Power: A Short History of Reproductive Politics in America (New York: New York University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Sood, Satya V., ‘Some Operative and Postoperative Hazards of Legal Termination of Pregnancy’, British Medical Journal, vol. 4 no. 5782 (1971), 270–73.Google Scholar

Soper, J. Christopher, Evangelical Christianity in the United States and Britain: Religious Beliefs, Political Choices (London: Macmillan, 1994).Google Scholar

Southall Black Sisters, ‘SBS Urges a No Vote to the Amendment on Sex Selective Abortion on the Serious Crime Bill’ (2015, republished 2019), https://southallblacksisters.org.uk/news/sbs-urges-a-no-vote-to-the-amendment-on-sex-selective-abortion-on-the-serious-crime-bill/Google Scholar

Speaking of Imelda, ‘Why Imelda?’ (2018), www.speakingofimelda.org/why-imeldaGoogle Scholar

Spivak, G. C., ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), pp. 271–314.Google Scholar

SPUC, ‘At-Home Abortions: The Case against a Permanent Policy’ (2021), www.spuc.org.uk/Portals/0/ThemePluginPro/uploads/2021/3/23/SPUC%20%E2%80%93%20At-home%20abortions%20%E2%80%93%20the%20case%20against%20a%20permanent%20policy_12pp_A4_3_web.pdfGoogle Scholar

SPUC, ‘Campaigns’ (2021), www.spuc.org.uk/Get-Involved/CampaignsGoogle Scholar

SPUC, ‘Fundraise’ (2018), www.spuc.org.uk/ArticleHandler/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/383469/FundraiseGoogle Scholar

SPUC, ‘Pro-abortion House of Commons Speaker Stands Down Leaving “Untold Damage to Unborn Babies and their Mothers”’ (2019), www.spuc.org.uk/News/News-Articles/ArticleType/ArticleView/ArticleID/384203Google Scholar

SPUC, ‘SPUC Seeks Legal Recourse as Government Extends DIY at Home Abortion due to Coronavirus Crisis’ (2020), www.spuc.org.uk/News/ID/384353/SPUC-seeks-legal-recourse-as-government-extends-DIY-at-home-abortion-due-to-Coronavirus-crisisGoogle Scholar

Staham, H., Solomou, W., and Green, J., ‘Late Termination of Pregnancy: Law, Policy and Decision Making in Four English Fetal Medicine Units’, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 113 no. 12 (2006), 1402–11.Google Scholar

Steel, David, Against Goliath: David Steel’s Story (London: Pan Books, 1991).Google Scholar

St John-Stevas, Norman, ‘Little Enlightenment from Lane’, The Tablet, vol. 228 (1974), 362.Google Scholar

St John-Stevas, Norman, The Agonising Choice (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1971).Google Scholar

St John-Stevas, Norman, The Right to Life (London: Hodder, 1963).Google Scholar

St John-Stevas, Norman, The Two Cities (London: Faber & Faber, 1984).Google Scholar

Stith, Richard, ‘Facing the Unborn’, First Things (2015), www.firstthings.com/article/2015/08/facing-the-unbornGoogle Scholar

Sugarman, David, ‘From Legal Biography to Legal Life Writing: Broadening Conceptions of Legal History and Socio-legal Scholarship’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 42 no. 1 (2015), 7–33.Google Scholar

Swales, Kirby and Taylor, Eleanor Attar, ‘Moral Issues: Sex, Gender Identity and Euthanasia’ in National Centre for Social Research, British Social Attitudes, no. 34 (2017), www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-34/key-findings/context.aspxGoogle Scholar

Symonds, Melanie, And Still They Weep: Personal Stories of Abortion (London: Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 1996).Google Scholar

Tansey, E. M. and Christie, D. A. (eds), Looking at the Unborn: Historical Aspects of Obstetric Ultrasound, Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine Seminar Transcript (London: Wellcome, 2000).Google Scholar

Tate Britain, ‘Queer British Art 1861–1967’ (2017), www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/exhibition/queer-british-art-1861-1967Google Scholar

Taylor, Robert Brett and Wilson, Adelyn, ‘UK Abortion Law: Reform Proposals, Private Members’ Bills, Devolution and the Role of the Courts’, Modern Law Review, vol. 82 no. 1 (2019), 71–128.Google Scholar

Temkin, Jennifer, ‘The Lane Committee Report on the Abortion Act’, Modern Law Review, vol. 37 no. 6 (1974), 657–63.Google Scholar

‘The Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Memorandum on the Abortion Act in Practice’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 120 no. 557 (1972), 449–51.Google Scholar

Third Sector, ‘Opinion: Hot Issue – Should the Government Withdraw the Annual £12m Funding to BPAS?’ (2004), www.thirdsector.co.uk/opinion-hot-issue-government-withdraw-annual-12m-funding-bpas/article/614146Google Scholar

Thomas, Gareth M., Down’s Syndrome Screening and Reproductive Politics: Care, Choice, and Disability in the Prenatal Clinic (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar

Thomlinson, Natalie, Race, Ethnicity and the Women’s Movement in England, 1968–1993 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar

Thomson, Jennifer, ‘Abortion Law and Scotland: An Issue of What?’, Political Quarterly, vol. 89 no. 1 (2017), 100–07.Google Scholar

Thynne, Lizzie (dir.), ‘The Feelings behind the Slogans Part 2’, commissioned for Sisterhood and After: The Women’s Liberation Oral History Project (2011), www.bl.uk/collection-items/the-feelings-behind-the-slogans-part-2Google Scholar

Todd, N. A., ‘Psychiatric Experience of the Abortion Act (1967)’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 119 no. 552 (1971), 489–95.Google Scholar

Trades Union Congress, Annual Report 1975 (Blackpool, TUC: 1975).Google Scholar

Tunkel, Victor, ‘Abortion: How Early, How Late, and How Legal?’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 6184 (1979), 253–56.Google Scholar

Tunkel, Victor, ‘Modern Anti-Pregnancy Techniques and the Criminal Law’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1974 (1974), 461–71.Google Scholar

Tunnadine, David and Green, Roger, Unwanted Pregnancy – Accident or Illness? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Uberoi, Elise and Lees, Rebecca, ‘Ethnic Diversity in Politics and Public Life’, House of Commons Library Research Briefing (2020), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01156/Google Scholar

Underwood, Betty, ‘The Lane Abortion Report – A Feminist View’, Spare Rib, no. 24 (1974), 22.Google Scholar

Unnithan, Maya and Dubuc, Sylvie, ‘Re-visioning Evidence: Reflections on the Recent Controversy around Gender Selective Abortion in the UK’, Global Public Health, vol. 13 no. 6 (2018), 742–53.Google Scholar

US Senate, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, ‘The Medical Evidence Concerning Fetal Pain’, First Session, 21 May 1985 (S. Hrg. 99-429, Serial No. J-99-28) http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/gdoc/hearings/8/86601288/86601288_1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Vallance, Elizabeth, Women in the House: A Study of Women Members of Parliament (London: Athlone Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Voas, David and Crockett, Alasdair, ‘Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging’, Sociology, vol. 39 no. 1 (2005), 11–28.Google Scholar

Waite, Marjorie, ‘Consultant Psychiatrists and Abortion’, Psychological Medicine, vol. 4 no. 1 (1974), 76–88.Google Scholar

Ward, Margaret, ‘The Woman’s Movement in the North of Ireland’ in Hutton, Sean and Stewart, Paul (eds), Ireland’s Histories: Aspects of State, Society and Ideology (London: Routledge 1991), pp. 149–63.Google Scholar

Warden, John, ‘Abortion Minefield for Doctors’, British Medical Journal, vol. 295 no. 6605 (1987), 1076.Google Scholar

Wellcome Trust, ‘Wellcome Trust Monitor Survey Report: Tracking Public Views on Medical Research’ (2009), https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/monitor-wave1-wellcome-sep09.pdfGoogle Scholar

Wellings, Kaye, Jones, Kyle G., Mercer, Catherine H., Tanton, Clare, Clifton, Soazig, Datta, Jessica, Copas, Andrew J., Erens, Bob, Gibson, Lorna J., Macdowall, Wendy, Sonnenberg, Pam, Phelps, Andrew, and Johnson, Anne M., ‘The Prevalence of Unplanned Pregnancy and Associated Factors in Britain: Findings from the Third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3)’, Lancet, vol. 382 no. 9907 (2013), 1807–16.Google Scholar

Whitaker, Robin and Horgan, Goretti, ‘Abortion Governance in the New Northern Ireland’ in Anton, Lorena, De Zordo, Silvia, and Mishtal, Joanna (eds), A Fragmented Landscape. Abortion Governance and Associated Protest Logics in Postwar Europe (New York: Berghahn, 2016), pp. 245–65.Google Scholar

Who’s Who, ‘Corrie, John Alexander’ (2007), www.ukwhoswho.com/search?q=john+corrie&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=trueGoogle Scholar

Widdecombe, Ann, Strictly Ann: The Autobiography (London: Pheonix, 2014).Google Scholar

Wilkes, Eric, ‘Working of the Abortion Act’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5966 (1975), 337.Google Scholar

Williams, Clare, ‘Framing the Fetus in Medical Work: Rituals and Practices’, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 60 no. 9 (2005), 2085–95.Google Scholar

Williams, Glanville, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law (London: Faber & Faber, 1958).Google Scholar

Williams, Glanville, Textbook of Criminal Law (London: Stevens, 2nd edition, 1983).Google Scholar

Williams, Jean Morton and Hindell, Keith, Abortion and Contraception: A Study of Patients’ Attitudes (London: Political and Economic Planning, 1972).Google Scholar

Williams, Robert, ‘Successful Appeal by Royal College of Nursing on Medical Termination of Pregnancy’, Lancet, vol. 316 no. 8203 (1980), 1091.Google Scholar

Wilson, Bryan, Religion in Secular Life, 50 Years On (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Winn, Denise, Experiences of Abortion (London: Macdonald, 1988).Google Scholar

Wivel, Ashley, ‘Abortion Policy and Politics on the Lane Committee of Enquiry, 1971–1974’, Social History of Medicine, vol. 11 no. 1 (1998), 109–35.Google Scholar

Women in Media, A Woman’s Choice (Belfast: Women in Media, 1980).Google Scholar

Women on Waves, ‘Warning, Fake Abortion Pills for Sale Online!!’ (2021), www.womenonwaves.org/en/page/974/warning-fake-abortion-pills-for-sale-onlineGoogle Scholar

Woods, Simon and Taylor, Kenneth, ‘Ethical and Governance Challenges in Human Fetal Tissue Research’, Clinical Ethics, vol. 3 no. 1 (2008), 14–19.Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia, ‘Sketch of the Past’ in Schulkind, Jeanne (ed.), Moments of Being (London: Pimlico, 2002).Google Scholar

Wright, David, Downs: The History of a Disability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Wright, Gerard, ‘Capable of Being Born Alive?’, New Law Journal, vol. 131 no. 5989 (1981), 188–89.Google Scholar

Wright, Gerard, ‘The Culture of Death: Talk Given at the Symposium of the Guild of Catholic Doctors’, Catholic Medical Quarterly (1999), www.cmq.org.uk/CMQ/1999/culture_of_death_g_wright.htmGoogle Scholar

Wright, Gerard, ‘The Legality of Abortion by Prostaglandin’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1984 (1984), 347–49.Google Scholar