Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T04:58:30.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

30 - Expertise in Chess

from PART V.C - GAMES AND OTHER TYPES OF EXPERTISE

By
Fernand Gobet  and
Neil Charness
Edited by
K. Anders Ericsson ,
Neil Charness ,
Paul J. Feltovich  and
Robert R. Hoffman
Fernand Gobet
Affiliation:
Department of Human Sciences, Brunel University
Neil Charness
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Florida State University
K. Anders Ericsson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Neil Charness
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Paul J. Feltovich
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Robert R. Hoffman
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Get access

Summary

Historical Background

Just like Drosophila – the fruit fly – is a model organism in genetics, chess has long served as a model task environment (similar to how is a model in genetics Drosophila – fruit fly) for research into psychological processes (Charness, 1992). Some of the earliest systematic work on individual differences in imagery (Binet, 1893/1966; 1894), memory (Djakow, Petrowski, & Rudik, 1927), and problem solving (de Groot 1946/1965) took place in the domain of chess. Cleveland (1907) was one of the first to identify the importance of complex units, now called chunks, in skilled play and speculated that intellectual abilities might be poor predictors of chess skill, even providing the score of a game played with a “mentally feeble” individual.

De Groot (1946/1965) ushered in the modern era of investigation using small groups of expert and grandmaster-level players in experimental studies. Of de Groot's many findings, it was the dissociation between thinking skills and perceptual-memory skills that laid the groundwork for subsequent research. When asking players to think aloud while they attempted to choose the best move in an unfamiliar position, de Groot discovered that, contrary to popular lore, the most-proficient players did not think further ahead than less-skilled practitioners. It was a different experimental task – memory for briefly presented chess positions – that markedly differentiated skill levels. De Groot found that skilled players proved to have strikingly superior memory for chess positions after brief presentations (two to fifteen seconds), compared to their less-proficient counterparts.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance , pp. 523 - 538
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amidzic, O., Riehle, H. J., Fehr, T., Wienbruch, C., & Elbert, T. (2001). Pattern of focal gamma bursts in chess players. Nature, 412, 603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atherton, M., Zhuang, J., Bart, W. M., Hu, X., & He, S. (2003). A functional MRI study of high-level cognition. I. The game of chess. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 26–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachmann, T., & Oit, M. (1992). Stroop-like interference in chess players' imagery: An unexplored possibility to be revealed by the adapted moving-spot task. Psychological Research, 54, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylor, G. W., & Simon, H. A. (1966). A chess mating combinations program. Proceedings of the 1966 Spring Joint Computer Conference, 28, 431–447.Google Scholar
Berliner, H., & Ebeling, C. (1989). Pattern knowledge and search: The SUPREM architecture. Artificial Intelligence, 38, 161–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binet, A. (1894). Psychologie des grands calculateurs et joueurs d'échecs. Paris: Hachette. [Republished by Slatkine Ressources, Paris, 1981.]Google Scholar
Binet, A. (1966). Mnemonic virtuosity: A study of chess players. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 74, 127–162. Translated from Revue des Deux Mondes, (1893), 117, 826–859.Google ScholarPubMed
Calderwood, R., Klein, G. A., & Crandall, B. W. (1988). Time pressure, skill, and move quality in chess. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campitelli, G. (2003). Cognitive and neuronal bases of expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Campitelli, G., & Gobet, F. (2005). The mind's eye in blindfold chess. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabris, C. F., & Hamilton, S. E. (1992). Hemispheric specialization for skilled perceptual organization by chessmasters. Neuropsychologia, 30, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chabris, C. F., & Hearst, E. S. (2003). Visualization, pattern recognition, and forward search: Effects of playing speed and sight of the position on grandmaster chess errors. Cognitive Science, 27, 637–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, N. (1976). Memory for chess positions: Resistance to interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 641–653.Google Scholar
Charness, N. (1981a). Aging and skilled problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, N. (1981b). Search in chess: Age and skill differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 467–476.Google Scholar
Charness, N. (1989). Expertise in chess and bridge. In Klahr, D. & Kotovsky, K. (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 183–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Charness, N. (1992). The impact of chess research on cognitive science. Psychological Research, 54, 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, N., & Gerchak, Y. (1996). Participation rates and maximal performance: A log-linear explanation for group differences, such as Russian and male dominance in chess. Psychological Science, 7, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, N., Krampe, R., & Mayr, U. (1996). The role of practice and coaching in entrepreneurial skill domains: An international comparison of life-span chess skill acquisition. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 51–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Charness, N., Reingold, E. M., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1146–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charness, N., Tuffiash, M., & Jastrzembski, T. (2004). Motivation, emotion, and expert skill acquisition. In Dai, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives (pp. 299–319). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Charness, N., Tuffiash, M., Krampe, R., Reingold, E. M., & Vasyukova, E. (2005). The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973a). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973b). The mind's eye in chess. In Chase, W. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In Siegler, R. S. (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Christiaen, J., & Verhofstadt-Denève, L. (1981). Schaken en cognitieve ontwikkeling. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 36, 561–582.Google Scholar
Cleveland, A. A. (1907). The psychology of chess and of learning to play it. American Journal of Psychology, 18, 269–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, N. J., Atlas, R. S., Lane, D. M., & Berger, R. C. (1993). Role of high-level knowledge in memory for chess positions. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 321–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranberg, L., & Albert, M. L. (1988). The chess mind. In Obler, L. K. & Fein, D. (Eds.), The exceptional brain. Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 156–190). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Groot, A. D. (1946). Het denken van den schaker. Amsterdam: Noord Hollandsche.Google Scholar
Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Groot, A. D., & Gobet, F. (1996). Perception and memory in chess. Assen (The Netherlands): Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Didierjean, A., Cauzinille-Marmèche, E., & Savina, Y. (1999). Learning from examples: Case-based reasoning in chess for novices. Current Psychology of Cognition, 18, 337–361.Google Scholar
Djakow, I. N., Petrowski, N. W., & Rudik, P. A. (1927). Psychologie des Schachspiels. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Doll, J., & Mayr, U. (1987). Intelligenz und Schachleistung – eine Untersuchung an Schachexperten. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 270–289.Google Scholar
Elo, A. E. (1965). Age changes in master chess performances. Journal of Gerontology, 20, 289–299.Google Scholar
Elo, A. E. (1986). The rating of chessplayers, past and present, (2nd ed.). New York: Arco chess.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Harris, M. S. (1990, November). Expert chess memory without chess knowledge: A training study. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, K. A., & Oliver, W. (1984, November). Skilled memory in blindfolded chess. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Staszewski, J. J. (1989). Skilled memory and expertise: Mechanisms of exceptional performance. In Klahr, D. & Kotovsky, K. (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 235–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum A.Google Scholar
Fisk, A. D., & Lloyd, S. J. (1988). The role of stimulus to role consistency in learning rapid application of spatial rules. Human Factors, 30, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, A., & Hondt, W. (1979). Aptitudes et apprentissage du jeu d'échecs au Zaire. Psychopathologie Africaine, 15, 81–98.Google Scholar
Frey, P. W., & Adesman, P. (1976). Recall memory for visually presented chess positions. Memory & Cognition, 4, 541–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freyhoff, H., Gruber, H., & Ziegler, A. (1992). Expertise and hierarchical knowledge representation in chess. Psychological Research, 54, 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydman, M., & Lynn, R. (1992). The general intelligence and spatial abilities of gifted young Belgian chess players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 233–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobet, F. (1993). Les mémoires d'un joueur d'échecs. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires.Google Scholar
Gobet, F. (1997). A pattern-recognition theory of search in expert problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F. (1998a). Expert memory: A comparison of four theories. Cognition, 66, 115–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F. (1998b). Chess players' thinking revisited. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 18–32.Google Scholar
Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (in press). Education and chess: A critical review. In Redman, T. (Ed.), Education and chess.Google Scholar
Gobet, F., Campitelli, G., & Waters, A. J. (2002). Rise of human intelligence: Comments on Howard (1999). Intelligence, 30, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Clarkson, G. (2004). Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four … or is it two? Memory, 12, 732–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobet, F., Voogt, A., & Retschitzki, J. (2004). Moves in mind: The psychology of board games. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gobet, F., & Jackson, S. (2002). In search of templates. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Jansen, P. J. (1994). Towards a chess program based on a model of human memory. In Herik, H. J., Herschberg, I. S., & Uiterwijk, J. W. (Eds.), Advances in computer chess 7 (pp. 35–60). Maastricht: University of Limburg Press.Google Scholar
Gobet, F., & Jansen, P. J. (in press). Training in chess: A scientific approach. In Redman, T. (Ed.), Education and chess.Google Scholar
Gobet, F., Lane, P. C. R., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C. H., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996a). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996b). Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996c). Recall of random and distorted positions: Implications for the theory of expertise. Memory & Cognition, 24, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996d). The roles of recognition processes and look-ahead search in time-constrained expert problem solving: Evidence from grandmaster level chess. Psychological Science, 7, 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1998). Expert chess memory: Revisiting the chunking hypothesis. Memory, 6, 225–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Five seconds or sixty? Presentation time in expert memory. Cognitive Science, 24, 651–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Waters, A. J. (2003). The role of constraints in expert memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29, 1082–1094.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldin, S. E. (1978). Memory for the ordinary: Typicality effects in chess memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 605–616.Google Scholar
Goldin, S. E. (1979). Recognition memory for chess positions: Some preliminary research. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holding, D. H. (1985). The psychology of chess skill. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holding, D. H., & Reynolds, R. (1982). Recall or evaluation of chess positions as determinants of chess skill. Memory and Cognition, 10, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horgan, D. D., & Morgan, D. (1990). Chess expertise in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. W. (1999). Preliminary real-world evidence that average human intelligence really is rising. Intelligence, 27, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, R. W. (1968). Het oog van de meester (The eye of the master). Assen (The Netherlands): Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Lassiter, G. D. (2000). The relative contributions of recognition and search-evaluation processes to high-level chess performance: Comment on Gobet and Simon. Psychological Science, 11, 172–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGregor, S. J., & Howes, A. (2002). The role of attack and defense semantics in skilled players' memory for chess positions. Memory & Cognition, 30, 707–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milojkovic, J. D. (1982). Chess imagery in novice and master. Journal of Mental Imagery, 6, 125–144.Google Scholar
Mireles, D. E., & Charness, N. (2002). Computational explorations of the influence of structured knowledge on age-related cognitive decline. Psychology and Aging, 17, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nichelli, P., Grafman, J., Pietrini, P., Alway, D., et al. (1994). Brain activity in chess playing. Nature, 369, 191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onofrj, M., Curatola, L., Valentini, G. L., Antonelli, M., Thomas, A., & Fulgente, T. (1995). Non-dominant dorsal-prefrontal activation during chess problem solution evidenced by single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT). Neuroscience Letters, 198, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitrat, J. (1977). A chess combinations program which uses plans. Artificial Intelligence, 8, 275–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Schultetus, R. S., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: Parallel encoding of chess relations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 504–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saariluoma, P. (1984). Coding problem spaces in chess: A psychological study. Commentationes scientiarum socialium 23. Turku: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Saariluoma, P. (1985). Chess players' intake of task-relevant cues. Memory and Cognition, 13, 385–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saariluoma, P. (1990). Apperception and restructuring in chess players problem solving. In Gilhooly, K. J., Keane, M. T. G., Logie, R. H., & Erdos, G. (Eds.), Lines of thought: Reflections on the psychology of thinking (Vol. II, pp. 41–57). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Saariluoma, P. (1991). Aspects of skilled imagery in blindfold chess. Acta Psychologica, 77, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saariluoma, P. (1992). Error in chess: The apperception-restructuring view. Psychological Research, 54, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saariluoma, P. (1994). Location coding in chess. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saariluoma, P. (1995). Chess players' thinking: A cognitive psychological approach. London: Routlege.Google Scholar
Saariluoma, P., & Hohlfeld, M. (1994). Apperception in chess players' long-range planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saariluoma, P., & Kalakoski, V. (1997). Skilled imagery and long-term working memory. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saariluoma, P., & Kalakoski, V. (1998). Apperception and imagery in blindfold chess. Memory, 6, 67–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Saariluoma, P., & Laine, T. (2001). Novice construction of chess memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultetus, R. S., & Charness, N. (1999). Recall or evaluation of chess positions revisited: The relationship between memory and evaluation in chess skill. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 555–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W., Gruber, H., Gold, A., & Opwis, K. (1993). Chess expertise and memory for chess positions in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 328–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. J. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tikhomirov, O. K., & Poznyanskaya, E. D. (1966). An investigation of visual search as a means of analyzing heuristics. Soviet Psychology, 5, 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, D. A., & Scurrah, M. J. (1971). Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 454–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E.- J. (2005). A psychometric analysis of chess expertise. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 29–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Waters, A. J., Gobet, F., & Leyden, G. (2002). Visuo-spatial abilities in chess players. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1980). Using patterns and plans in chess. Artificial Intelligence, 14, 165–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×