Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Open Strategy
- Part II Practices of Open Strategy
- Part III Technological Assemblages for Open Strategy
- Part IV Theoretical Perspectives
- Part V Challenges of Open Strategy
- Index
- References
Part II - Practices of Open Strategy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2019
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Open Strategy
- Part II Practices of Open Strategy
- Part III Technological Assemblages for Open Strategy
- Part IV Theoretical Perspectives
- Part V Challenges of Open Strategy
- Index
- References
Summary
In responding to changing competitive conditions, organizations are adopting increased levels of openness in the form of greater transparency and the inclusion of a larger number and variety of internal and external actors (Whittington et al., 2011; Hautz et al., 2017). Recent societal changes toward more participation in various domains of society (Dobusch et al., 2015) and technological advances in the form of social technologies (Haefliger et al., 2011), in particular, promote increased inclusiveness in strategizing. In this chapter, we pay specific attention to this dimension of inclusiveness in Open Strategy, which involves external and internal consultation to exchange “information, views and proposals intended to shape the continued evolution of an organization’s strategy” (Whittington et al., 2011: 536; Hautz et al., 2017).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy , pp. 85 - 166Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Abfalter, D., Zaglia, M. E., & Mueller, J. (2012). Sense of virtual community: A follow up on its measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 400–404.Google Scholar
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search. Academy of Management Review, 37, 355–375.Google Scholar
Aten, K., & Thomas, G. F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 148–180.Google Scholar
Bafoutsou, G., & Mentzas, G. (2002). Review and functional classification of collaborative systems. International Journal of Information Management, 22, 281–305.Google Scholar
Baptista, J., Wilson, A. D., Galliers, R. D., & Bynghall, S. (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50, 322–336.Google Scholar
Berger-Baader-Hermes. (2012). Hypovereinsbank – Wenn ich mein Kunde wär [Online]. Available: www.bergerbaaderhermes.de/Cases [Accessed 19.12.2012.]Google Scholar
Bertotti, M., Adams-Eaton, F., Sheridan, K., & Renton, A. (2012). Key barriers to community cohesion: Views from residents of 20 London deprived neighbourhoods. GeoJournal, 77, 223–234.Google Scholar
Bjelland, O., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An inside view of IBM’s “Innovation Jam.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 33-40.Google Scholar
Bonabeau, E. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. Sloan Management Review, January 9, 2009, 45–52.Google Scholar
Borison, A., & Hamm, G. (2010). Prediction markets: A new tool for strategic decision making. California Management Review, 52, 125–141.Google Scholar
Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2013). Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 61–69.Google Scholar
Bungartz, T. (2011). Interview Dr. Thomas Bungartz, Deutsche Telekom. www.crowdworx.com/de/news/interview-dr-thomas-bungartz-deutsche-telekom/.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.Google Scholar
Camillus, J. C. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review, 86, 98.Google Scholar
Candido, C. J. F., & Santos, S. P. (2015). Strategy implementation: What is the failure rate? Journal of Management & Organization, 21, 237–262.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-L., & Chen, S.-T. (2015). The impact of World Café on entrepreneurial strategic planning capability. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1283–1290.Google Scholar
CrowdWorx (2007–2013a). CrowdWorx helps Syngenta focus on the right products. CrowdWorx ® Case Study Series, Berlin | Munich | Boston | Poznan. www.crowdworx.com/resources/case-studies/.Google Scholar
CrowdWorx (2007–2013b). Deutsche Telekom delivers New Products just at the right price with the help of CrowdWorx. CrowdWorx ® Case Study Series, Berlin | Munich | Boston | Poznan. www.crowdworx.com/resources/case-studies/.Google Scholar
CrowdWorx (2007–2013c). Henkel – Right on the money: Unit sales forecasts for new products. CrowdWorx ® Case Study Series, Berlin | Munich | Boston | Poznan. www.crowdworx.com/resources/case-studies/.Google Scholar
CrowdWorx (2007–2013d). Zeppelin Rental zapft das lokale Marktwissen aus über 100 Standorten an. CrowdWorx® Case Study Series, Berlin | Munich | Boston | Poznan. www.crowdworx.com/resources/case-studies/.Google Scholar
Culleton, E. (2013). We’re crowdsourcing ideas for our Strategic Plan! [Online]. Available: http://emergency20wiki.org/20131125/were-crowdsourcing-ideas-for-ourstrategic-plan.Google Scholar
Da Cunha, J. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2008). Performing catharsis: The use of online discussion forums in organizational change. Information and Organization, 18, 132–156.Google Scholar
Dachler, H. P., & Wilper, B. (1978). Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1–39.Google Scholar
Denyer, D., Parry, E., & Flowers, P. (2011). “Social,” “open” and “participative”? Exploring personal experiences and organisational effects of enterprise 2.0 use. Long Range Planning, 44, 375–396.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L., & Muller-Seitz, G. (2018). Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process. Organization Studies.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (2018). Open strategy-making with crowds and communities: Comparing Wikimedia and Creative Commons. Long Range Planning, 51, 561–579.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., von Krogh, G., & Whittington, R. (2015). Open organizations for an open society? Practicing openness in innovation, strategy and beyond. Call for Papers Sub-theme 46 EGOS – European Group for Organizational Studies. Athens.Google Scholar
Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2008). The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia’s rollercoaster experience. California Management Review, 50, 95–118.Google Scholar
Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43, 914–925.Google Scholar
Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25, 154–177.Google Scholar
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (1999). Knowledge creation and social networks in corporate entrepreneurship: The renewal of organizational capability. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 23, 123–143.Google Scholar
Fullarton, C., & Palermo, J. (2008). Evaluation of a large group method in an educational institution: The world café versus large group facilitation. Journal of Institutional Research, 14, 109–117.Google Scholar
Gast, A., & Zanini, M. (2012). The social side of strategy. McKinsey Quarterly, May, 1–15.Google Scholar
Gegenhuber, T., & Dobusch, L. (2017). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures. Long Range Planning, 50, 337–354.Google Scholar
Gratton, L., & Casse, J. (2010). Boosting strategy with an online community. Business Strategy Review, Spring 2010, 41–45.Google Scholar
Haefliger, S., Monteiro, E., Foray, D., & von Krogh, G. (2011). Social software and strategy. Long Range Planning, 44, 297–316.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. (1996). Strategy as revolution. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 69–82.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2006). Swimming with sharks: Creating strategic change through multi-sector collaboration. International Journal of Strategic Change Management 1, 96–112.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, S., & Steger, T. (2013). “A brave new (digital) world”? Effects of in-house social media on HRM. Zeitschrift für Personalsforschung, 27, 26–46.Google Scholar
Hautz, J. (2017). Opening up the strategy process – a network perspective. Management Decision, 55, 1956–1983.Google Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50, 298–309.Google Scholar
Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., & Johnson, G. (2015). Off to plan or out to lunch? Relationships between design characteristics and outcomes of strategy workshops. British Journal of Management, 26, 507–528.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G., & Schwarz, M. (2006). The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: Formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion. Long Range Planning, 39, 479–496.Google Scholar
Hutter, K., Nketia, B. A., & Fuller, J. (2017). Falling short with participation – Different effects of ideation, commenting, and evaluating behavior on open strategizing. Long Range Planning, 50, 355–370.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21, 1016–1033.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., & Regner, P. (2014). Exploring strategy: Text and cases. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Ketokivi, M., & Castener, X. (2004). Strategic planning as an integrative device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 337–365.Google Scholar
Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 323–338.Google Scholar
Koch, B. (2013). Open strategy and its implementation – An exploratory study. Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60–84.Google Scholar
Latham, J. R. (2008). Building bridges between researchers and practitioners: A collaborative approach to research in performance excellence. Quality Management Journal, 15 (1), 20.Google Scholar
Lombardi, G. (2016). Unilever Leaders Chat Strategy with Employees [Online]. Available: https://simply-communicate.com/unilever-leaders-chat-strategy-employees/ [Accessed 03.04.2016.]Google Scholar
Luedicke, M. K., Husemann, K. C., Furnari, S., & Ladstaetter, F. (2017). Radically open strategizing: How the Premium Cola collective takes open strategy to the extreme. Long Range Planning, 50, 371–384.Google Scholar
Mack, D. Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, 50, 385–396.Google Scholar
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Using public crowds for open strategy formulation: Mitigating the risks of knowledge gaps. Long Range Planning, 50, 397–410.Google Scholar
Mantere, S., & Vaara, E. (2008). On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discursive perspective. Organization Science, 19, 341–358.Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Fuller, J., Koch, B., Hautz, J., & Hutter, K. (2014). Open strategy – A new strategy paradigm? In Matzler, K., Pechlaner, H., & Renzl, B. (Eds.), Strategie und Leadership. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Fuller, J., Hutter, K., Hautz, J., & Stieger, D. (2016a). Crowdsourcing strategy: How openness changes strategy work. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14, 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzler, K., Strobl, A., & Bailom, F. (2016b). Leadership and the wisdom of crowds: How to tap into the collective intelligence of an organization. Strategy & Leadership, 44, 30–35.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (2009). Rebuilding companies as communities. Harvard Business Review, 87, 140–143.Google Scholar
Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. J. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 212–238.Google Scholar
Morton, J., Wilson, A., & Cooke, L. (2015). Collaboration and knowledge sharing in open strategy initiatives. In Proceedings of iFutures 2015, Sheffield, UK, 7 July 2015, 7pp.Google Scholar
Morton, J., Wilson, A. D., Galliers, R. D., & Marabelli, M. (2017). Open strategy and IT: A review and research agenda. 33rd EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6th-8th July 2017.Google Scholar
Neeley, T. B., & Leonardi, P. (2018). Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: Passable trust and the paradox of non-work interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 922–946.Google Scholar
Newstead, B., & Lanzerotti, L. (2010). Can you open-source your strategy? Harvard Business Review, October Issue, 32.Google Scholar
Oobstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius Iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130.Google Scholar
Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pappas, J. M., & Wooldridge, B. (2007). Middle managers’ divergent strategic activity: An investigation of multiple measures of network centrality. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 323–341.Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 85–101.Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 28, 89–106.Google Scholar
Prpic, J., Shukla, P. P., Kietzmann, J. H., & McCarthy, I. P. (2015). How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing. Business Horizons, 58, 77–85.Google Scholar
Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 272–290.Google Scholar
Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., & Nabeth, T. (2014). Social media in organizations: Leveraging personal and collective knowledge processes. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 24, 74–93.Google Scholar
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240–267.Google Scholar
Reitzig, M., & Sorenson, O. (2013). Biases in the selection stage of bottom-up strategy formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 782–799.Google Scholar
Schieffer, A., Isaacs, D., & Gyllenpalm, B. (2004). The world café: Part one. World, 18, 1–9.Google Scholar
Seidl, D., & Werle, F. (2018). Inter-organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta-problems: Requisite variety and dynamics of participation. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 830–858.Google Scholar
Sijbrandij, S. (2016). GitLab’s Open Strategy [Online]. Available: https://about.gitlab.com/2016/02/09/gitlab-open-strategy/ [Accessed 10.04.2016.]Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (1999). Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In Smith, M. A. & Kollock, P. (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sterling, J. (2003). Translating strategy into effective implementation: Dispelling the myths and highlighting what works. Strategy & Leadership, 31, 27–34.Google Scholar
Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. (2012). Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review, 54, 44–68.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
Teck-Hua, H., & Kay-Yut, C. (2007). New product blockbusters: The magic and science of prediction markets. California Management Review, 50, 144–158.Google Scholar
Teulier, R., & Rouleau, L. (2013). Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: Translation spaces and editing practices. Journal of Change Management, 13, 308–337.Google Scholar
Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23, 1024–1039.Google Scholar
Vana, P. (2011). Working in the café: Lessons in group dialogue. The Learning Organization, 18, 189–202.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. V. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14, 209–223.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21, 154–164.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 32(7), 1217–1241.Google Scholar
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Werle, F., & Seidl, D. (2015). The layered materiality of strategizing: Epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics. British Journal of Management, 26, S67-S89.Google Scholar
Whitehurst, J. (2015). The open organization: Igniting passion and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (2014). Commentary: Information systems strategy and strategy-as-practice: A joint agenda. Journal of Strategy Information Systems, 23, 87–91.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22, 531–544.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. (2008). The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. Journal of Management, 34, 1190–1221.Google Scholar
Yakis-Douglas, B., Angwin, D., Ahn, K., & Meadows, M. (2017). Opening M&A strategy to investors: Predictors and outcomes of transparency during organisational transition. Long Range Planning, 50, 411–422.Google Scholar
Yeaney, J. (2011). Democratizing the Corporate Strategy Process at Red Hat [Online]. Available: http://www.managementexchange.com/story/democratizing-corporate-strategy-process-red-hat.Google Scholar
References
Abrahamsen, M. H., Henneberg, S. C., Huemer, L., & Naudé, P. (2016). Network picturing: An action research study of strategizing in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 107–119.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. E. (2016). Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: Picking up the slack in communication and collaboration. Library Hi Tech News, 9, 6–9.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363.Google Scholar
Aten, K., & Thomas, G. F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 148–180.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 15–36.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). Coopetition – Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180–188.Google Scholar
Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, G. (2016). The practice of scenario planning: An analysis of inter- and intra-organizational strategizing. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 77–96.Google Scholar
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.Google Scholar
Brummans, B., Cooren, F., Robichaud, D., & Taylor, J. (2014). Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. In Putnam, L. L. & Mumby, D. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 173–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Camillus, J. C. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 98. https://hbr.org/2008/05/strategy-as-a-wicked-problemGoogle Scholar
Cardon, P. W., & Marshall, B. (2015). The hype and reality of social media use for work collaboration and team communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 273–293.Google Scholar
Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 895–907.Google Scholar
Colville, I., Brown, A. D., & Pye, A. (2012). Simplexity: Sensemaking, organizing and storytelling for our time. Human Relations, 65(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 181–235.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–49.Google Scholar
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.Google Scholar
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.Google Scholar
de Gooyert, V., Rouwette, E., van Kranenburg, H., & Freeman, E. (2017). Reviewing the role of stakeholders in operational research: A stakeholder theory perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), 402–410.Google Scholar
de Gooyert, V., Rouwette, E., van Kranenburg, H., Freeman, E., & van Breen, H. (2016). Sustainability transition dynamics: Towards overcoming policy resistance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111 (October 2016), 135–145.Google Scholar
Deken, F., Berends, H., Gemser, G., & Lauche, K. (2018). Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1920–1950.Google Scholar
Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 167.Google Scholar
Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008). Fast strategy: How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of the game. Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. (2000). Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 115–159.Google Scholar
Franco, L. A. (2008). Facilitating collaboration with problem structuring methods: A case study of an inter-organisational construction partnership. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(4), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, L. A., & Montibeller, G. (2010). Facilitated modelling in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(3), 489–500.Google Scholar
Gadde, L.-E., Huemer, L., & Håkansson, H. (2003). Strategizing in industrial networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(5), 357–364.Google Scholar
Green, A. O., & Hunton-Clarke, L. (2003). A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 292–299.Google Scholar
Hákansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, 55, 133–139.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. (1982). Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 159–174.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2006). Swimming with sharks: Creating strategic change through multi-sector collaboration. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 1(1/2), 96.Google Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.Google Scholar
Heger, T., & Boman, M. (2015). Networked foresight – The case of EIT ICT Labs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 147–164.Google Scholar
Henneberg, S. C., Mouzas, S., & Naudé, P. (2006). Network pictures: Concepts and representations. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3/4), 408–429.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P. (1997). Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: The Case of UK residential estate agents. Journal of Management Studies, 34(6), 921–945.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G., & Schwarz, M. (2006). The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: Formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion. Long Range Planning, 39(5), 479–496.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools‐in‐use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 537–558.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011). Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 665–695.Google Scholar
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1995). A procedural justice model of strategic decision making: Strategy content implications in the multinational. Organization Science, 6(1), 44–61.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60–84.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M., & Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Mattsson, L. G. (1987). Management of strategic change in a “markets-as-networks” perspective. In Pettigrew, A. (Ed.), The management of strategic change (pp. 234–256). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Narayanan, V. K., Zane, L. J., & Kemmerer, B. (2011). The cognitive perspective in strategy: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 305–351.Google Scholar
Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., & Vogel, D. R. (1991). Information technology for negotiating groups: Generating options for mutual gain. Management Science, 37(10), 1325–1346.Google Scholar
Nutt, P. C. (2002). Why decisions fail: Avoiding the blunders and traps that lead to debacles. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Nutt, P. C. (2004). Averting decision debacles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(3), 239–265.Google Scholar
Nutt, P. C. (2008). Investigating the success of decision making processes. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 425–455.Google Scholar
Öberg, C., Shih, T. T.-Y., & Chou, H.-H. (2016). Network strategies and effects in an interactive context. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 117–127.Google Scholar
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 403–445.Google Scholar
Pina e Cunha, M., & Chia, R. (2007). Using teams to avoid peripheral blindness. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 559–573.Google Scholar
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397–416.Google Scholar
Reger, R. K., & Palmer, T. B. (1996). Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organization Science, 7(1), 22–39.Google Scholar
Richardson, G., Andersen, D., Maxwell, T., & Stewart, T. (1994). Foundations of mental model research. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Stirling, Scotland.Google Scholar
Rouwette, E., Bleijenbergh, I., & Vennix, J. (2016). Group model-building to support public policy: Addressing a conflicted situation in a problem neighbourhood. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(1), 64–78.Google Scholar
Rouwette, E. A., Vennix, J. A., & Mullekom, T. V. (2002). Group model building effectiveness: A review of assessment studies. System Dynamics Review, 18(1), 5–45.Google Scholar
Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Schmidthuber, L., & Wiener, M. (2018). Aiming for a sustainable future: Conceptualizing public open foresight. Public Management Review, 20(1), 82–107.Google Scholar
Seidl, D., & Werle, F. (2018). Inter-organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta-problems: Requisite variety and the dynamics of participation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 830–858.Google Scholar
Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. (2012). Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review, 54(4), 44–68.Google Scholar
Sutanto, J., Tan, C. H., Battistini, B., & Phang, C. W. (2011). Emergent leadership in virtual collaboration settings: A social network analysis approach. Long Range Planning, 44(5–6), 421–439.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Huber, G. P. (1998). Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 793–807.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.Google Scholar
Teulier, R., & Rouleau, L. (2013). Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: Translation spaces and editing practices. Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 308–337.Google Scholar
Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1147–1161.Google Scholar
van der Duin, P., Heger, T., & Schlesinger, M. D. (2014). Toward networked foresight? Exploring the use of futures research in innovation networks. Futures, 59, 62–78.Google Scholar
Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1997). Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science, 8(4), 381–403.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis‐Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 531–544.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, A. (2003). Section 1. Introduction to the project. Journal of Risk Research, 6(4–6), 291–293.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, A., & Mangalagiu, D. (2012). Learning with futures to realise progress towards sustainability: The WBCSD Vision 2050 Initiative. Futures, 44(4), 372–384.Google Scholar
References
Abraham, S. (2005). Stretching strategic thinking. Strategy & Leadership, 33(5), 5–12.Google Scholar
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.Google Scholar
Aten, K., & Thomas, G. F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 148–180.Google Scholar
Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.Google Scholar
Baptista, J., Wilson, A. D., Galliers, R. D., & Bynghall, S. (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 322–336.Google Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. (1983). Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 273–284.Google Scholar
Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244.Google Scholar
Bjelland, O. M., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An inside view of IBM’s “Innovation Jam.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 32.Google Scholar
Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57(5), 843–863.Google Scholar
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.Google Scholar
Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A. K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010). Community‐based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290–303.Google Scholar
Charalabidis, Y., Triantafillou, A., Karkaletsis, V., & Loukis, E. (2012, September). Public policy formulation through non moderated crowdsourcing in social media. In International Conference on Electronic Participation (pp. 156–169). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2001). Effective strategies for moderators. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(4), 397–401.Google Scholar
Damian, D. E., & Zowghi, D. (2002, September). The impact of stakeholders’ geographical distribution on managing requirements in a multi-site organization. In Requirements Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE Joint International Conference on (pp. 319–328). IEEE.Google Scholar
DiPalantino, D., & Vojnovic, M. (2009, July). Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 119–128). ACM.Google Scholar
Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86–96.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (2013). Open strategy between crowd and community: Lessons from Wikimedia and Creative Commons. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2013, No. 1, p. 15831). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L., & Müller-Seitz, G. (2017). Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process. Organization Studies, 1–28.Google Scholar
Ebner, W., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management, 39(4), 342–356.Google Scholar
Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, P. (2012). “Orchestrating” sustainable crowdsourcing: A characterisation of solver brokerages. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(3), 216–232.Google Scholar
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (2000). Building strategy from the middle: Reconceptualizing strategy process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Geiger, D., Seedorf, S., Schulze, T., Nickerson, R. C., & Schader, M. (2011). Managing the Crowd: Towards a Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Processes. In AMCIS 2011 Proceedings – All Submissions. 430. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/430.Google Scholar
Hart, S., & Banbury, C. (1994). How strategy‐making processes can make a difference. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 251–269.Google Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298–309.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L., Gößwein, J., & Beaudette, P. (2017). Open strategy-making at the Wikimedia Foundation: A dialogic perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 5–35.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Baptista, J., & Galliers, R. D. (2013). Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: The impact of social media on internal communications. Information & Management, 50(2–3), 112–124.Google Scholar
Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2009). Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 758–765.Google Scholar
Huff, A. S., & Huff, J. O. (2001). Re‐focusing the business school agenda. British Journal of Management, 12(s1).Google Scholar
Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Füller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community‐based design contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2016). Interactive self-regulatory theory for sharing and protecting in interorganizational collaborations. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016–1033.Google Scholar
Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia’s corporate entrepreneurship strategy. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 60–71.Google Scholar
Lakhani, K. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Tushman, M. (2013). Open innovation and organizational boundaries: Task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. In Grandori, A. (Ed.), Handbook of economic organization: Integrating economic and organization theory (pp. 355–382). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998). The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 285–305.Google Scholar
Lee, H. (2005). Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(2), 385–403.Google Scholar
Leimeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 197–224.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458.Google Scholar
Liu, T. X., Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Chen, Y. (2014). Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Science, 60(8), 2020–2037.Google Scholar
Mack, D. Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, 50(3),385–396.Google Scholar
Majchrzak, A., Cooper, L. P., & Neece, O. E. (2004). Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Science, 50(2), 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013). Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(4), 257–268.Google Scholar
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2016). Effect of knowledge-sharing trajectories on innovative outcomes in temporary online crowds. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 685–703.Google Scholar
Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Managing crowds in innovation challenges. California Management Review, 56(4), 103–123.Google Scholar
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Kesebi, L., & Looram, S. (2017). Developing innovative solutions through internal crowdsourcing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4), 73.Google Scholar
Marabelli, M., & Newell, S. (2012). Knowledge risks in organizational networks: The practice perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(1), 18–30.Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392–413.Google Scholar
O’Connor, G. C., & Rice, M. P. (2001). Opportunity recognition and breakthrough innovation in large established firms. California Management Review, 43(2), 95–116.Google Scholar
Palmisano, S. (2004). Leading change when business is good. Interview by Hemp, Paul and Stewart, Thomas A.. Harvard Business Review, 82, 60–70.Google Scholar
Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.Google Scholar
Prpić, J., Shukla, P. P., Kietzmann, J. H., & McCarthy, I. P. (2015). How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing. Business Horizons, 58(1), 77–85.Google Scholar
Puranam, P., Alexy, O., & Reitzig, M. (2014). What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Academy of Management Review, 39(2), 162–180.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, F. M., Buchinger, W., Gassmann, O., & Obrist, M. (2012). Crowdsourcing: Leveraging innovation through online idea competitions. Research-Technology Management, 55(3), 32–38.Google Scholar
Seidl, D., & Werle, F. (2018). Inter‐organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta‐problems: Requisite variety and dynamics of participation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 830–858.Google Scholar
Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. (2012). Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review, 54(4), 44–68.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Wang, N., Yin, C., & Che, T. (2012). Investigating the Non-Linear Relationships in the Expectancy Theory: The Case of Crowdsourcing Marketplace (July 29, 2012), AMCIS 2012 Proceedings, Paper 6. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/VirtualCommunities/6Google Scholar
Swan, J., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: Networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 262–275.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.Google Scholar
Terwiesch, C., & Xu, Y. (2008). Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54(9), 1529–1543.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. (1997). Winning through innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 25(4), 14–19.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 154–164.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. B. (2011). Why prize? The surprising resurgence of prizes to stimulate innovation. Research-Technology Management, 54(6), 32–36.Google Scholar
Wallin, M. W., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Organizing for open innovation: Focus on the integration of knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 145–154.Google Scholar
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.Google Scholar
Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis‐Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 531–544.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, Y., Yokozawa, M., Shinohara, T., & Ishida, T. (2000, December). Collaboration with Lean Media: How open-source software succeeds. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 329–338). ACM.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008, July). Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: Strategic user behavior on taskcn. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce.Google Scholar
References
Addison, J. T. (2005). The determinants of firm performance: Unions, works councils, and employee involvement. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 406–450.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., & Starks, L. T. (2015). Influence of public opinion on investor voting and proxy advisors. Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. WP 2014-03-12; Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper No. 2447012; Dice Center Working Paper No. 2014-12. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2447012Google Scholar
Alexy, O., West, J., Klapper, H., & Reitzig, M. (2018). Surrendering control to gain advantage: Reconciling openness and the resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 1704–1727.Google Scholar
Almirall, E., Lee, M., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Open innovation requires integrated competition-community ecosystems: Lessons learned from civic open innovation. Business Horizons, 57, 391–400.Google Scholar
Amrollahi, A., Khansari, M., & Manian, A. (2014). How Open Source Software succeeds? A review of research on success of Open Source Software. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 6, 67–77.Google Scholar
Appleyard, M. M., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50, 310–321.Google Scholar
Baptista, J., Wilson, A. D., Galliers, R. D., & Bynghall, S. (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50, 322–336.Google Scholar
Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2010). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 3093–3129.Google Scholar
Benner, M. J., & Zenger, T. (2016). The lemons problem in markets for strategy. Strategy Science, 1, 71–89.Google Scholar
Berger, B., & Vaccarino, E. (2016). Codetermination in Germany – A role model for the UK and the US? [Online]. Bruegel. Available: http://bruegel.org/2016/10/codetermination-in-germany-a-role-model-for-the-uk-and-the-us/ [Accessed October 27, 2017].Google Scholar
Beunza, D., & Garud, R. (2007). Calculators, lemmings or frame‐makers? The intermediary role of securities analysts. The Sociological Review, 55, 13–39.Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. (2017). Reflections on open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50, 423–426.Google Scholar
Briscoe, F., & Gupta, A. (2016). Social activism in and around organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 671–727.Google Scholar
Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 437–458.Google Scholar
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.Google Scholar
Cowen, A. P., & Marcel, J. J. (2011). Damaged goods: Board decisions to dismiss reputationally compromised directors. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 509–527.Google Scholar
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39, 699–709.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., & Muller-Seitz, G. (2015). Closing open strategy: Strategy as a practice of thousands in the case of Wikimedia. Free University of Berlin working paper. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
Doshi, A. R., Dowell, G. W., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1209–1231.Google Scholar
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60, 2835–2857.Google Scholar
Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Krzus, M. P. (2011). Market interest in nonfinancial information. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23, 113–127.Google Scholar
Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Oesch, D. (2013). Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. Journal of Accounting Research, 51, 951–996.Google Scholar
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Beauchamp, T. & Bowie, N. (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 75–93). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fauver, L., & Fuerst, M. E. (2006). Does good corporate governance include employee representation? Evidence from German corporate boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 673–710.Google Scholar
Gast, A., & Zanini, M. (2012). The social side of strategy. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 82–93.Google Scholar
Gegenhuber, T., & Dobusch, L. (2017). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures. Long Range Planning, 50, 337–354.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433–448.Google Scholar
Goodman, J., Louche, C., van Cranenburgh, K. C., & Arenas, D. (2014). Social shareholder engagement: The dynamics of voice and exit. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 193–210.Google Scholar
Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. V. (2014). Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 40, 1230–1268.Google Scholar
Gramm, J. (2016). Dear chairman: Boardroom battles and the rise of shareholder activism. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Greve, H., Rowley, T., & Shipilov, A. (2013). Network advantage: How to unlock value from your alliances and partnerships. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Haefliger, S., Monteiro, E., Foray, D., & von Krogh, G. (2011). Social software and strategy. Long Range Planning, 44, 297–316.Google Scholar
Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.Google Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50, 298–309.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1727–1748.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L., Goesswein, J., & Beaudette, P. (2018). Open strategy-making at the Wikimedia Foundation: A dialogic perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54, 5–35.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G., & Schwarz, M. (2006). The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: Formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion. Long Range Planning, 39, 479–496.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12, 414–434.Google Scholar
Iliev, P., & Lowry, M. (2014). Are mutual funds active voters? The Review of Financial Studies, 28, 446–485.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.Google Scholar
Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2009). Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. The Journal of Finance, 64, 187–229.Google Scholar
Kube, M., Hilgers, D., Koch, G., & Fuller, J. (2015). Explaining voluntary citizen online participation using the concept of citizenship: An explanatory study on an open government platform. Journal of Business Economics, 85, 873–895.Google Scholar
Litov, L. P., Moreton, P., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Science, 58, 1797–1815.Google Scholar
Luedicke, M. K., Husemann, K. C., Furnari, S., & Ladstaetter, F. (2017). Radically open strategizing: How the Premium Cola collective takes open strategy to the extreme. Long Range Planning, 50, 371–384.Google Scholar
Mack, D. Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, 50, 385–396.Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Fuller, J., Hutter, K., Hautz, J., & Stieger, D. (2014a). Open strategy: Towards a research agenda. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2416937Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Fuller, J., Koch, B., Hautz, J., & Hutter, K. (2014b). Open strategy – A new strategy paradigm? In Matzler, K., Pechlaner, H., & Renzl, B. (Eds.), Strategie und Leadership. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
McGahan, A. (2015). Opening governance. Theme for the 75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 2015. Academy of Management, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Mergel, I. (2015). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 599–612.Google Scholar
Muller-Seitz, G., & Guttel, W. (2014). Toward a choreography of congregating: A practice-based perspective on organizational absorptive capacity in a semiconductor industry consortium. Management Learning, 45, 477–497.Google Scholar
Neeley, T. B., & Leonardi, P. M. (2018). Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: Passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 922–946.Google Scholar
Newstead, B., & Lanzerotti, L. (2010). Can you open-source your strategy? Harvard Business Review, October 2010.Google Scholar
Page, R. (2009). Co-determination in Germany – A beginner’s guide. Arbeitspapier 33 (Ed.). Düsseldorf: Hans Böckler Stiftung.Google Scholar
Partnoy, F., & Davidoff, Solomon, S. (2017). Frank and Steven’s excellent corporate raiding adventure. The Atlantic [Online]. Available: www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/05/frank-and-stevens-excellent-corporate-raiding-adventure/521436/ [Accessed October 17, 2017].Google Scholar
Plesner, U., & Gulbrandsen, I. T. (2015). Strategy and new media: A research agenda. Strategic Organization, 13, 153–162.Google Scholar
Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (2002). Managing cognition and strategy: Issues, trends and future directions. Handbook of Strategy Management Communication Quarterly, 165–181.Google Scholar
Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2016). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 750–772.Google Scholar
Rindova, V. P., & Fombrun, C. J. (1999). Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 691–710.Google Scholar
Sandbu, M. (2017). Hail the large activist investor. Financial Times [Online]. Available: www.ft.com/content/2833b1f6-bd5a-11e7-b8a3-38a6e068f464.Google Scholar
Sauder, A. (2018). #1: Push or Pull in Transformations? [Online]. Available: www.linkedin.com/pulse/1-push-pull-transformations-axel-sauder/ [Accessed July 22, 2018].Google Scholar
Schilling, M. A. (2010). Strategic management of technological innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Ziv, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2013). What do boards really do? Evidence from minutes of board meetings. Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 349–366.Google Scholar
Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rowley, T. J. (2010). When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 846–864.Google Scholar
Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. (1988). Executives’ perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In Hambrick, D. (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 35–65). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. J. C. M. R. (2012). Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review, 54, 44–68.Google Scholar
Tackx, K., & Verdin, P. (2014). Can co-creation lead to better strategy? An exploratory research. Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Working Papers, 14–027.Google Scholar
Tihanyi, L., Graffin, S., & George, G. (2014). Rethinking governance in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1535–1543.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6, 280–321.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis‐Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22, 531–544.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Yakis-Douglas, B., Ahn, K., & Cailluet, L. (2016). Strategic planners in more turbulent times: The changing job characteristics of strategy professionals, 1960–2003. Long Range Planning, 50(1), 108–119.Google Scholar
Wigboldus, J. E., Grift, Y., van den Berg, A., & Looise, J. K. (2016). The economic effects of works councils: Channels and conditions. Using secondary data to test a new theoretical model. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 37, 535–565.Google Scholar
Yakis-Douglas, B., Angwin, D., Ahn, K., & Meadows, M. (2017). Opening M&A strategy to investors: Predictors and outcomes of transparency during organisational transition. Long Range Planning, 50, 411–422.Google Scholar
Zenger, T. (2013). What is the theory of your firm? Harvard Business Review, 91, 72–78.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Wiersema, M. F. (2009). Stock market reaction to CEO certification: The signaling role of CEO background. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 693–710.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398–1438.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 591–619.Google Scholar
References
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C.L. (2002). Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
Alexy, O., Henkel, J., & Wallin, M.W. (2013). From closed to open: Job role changes, individual predispositions, and the adoption of commercial open source software development. Research Policy, 42, 1325–1340.Google Scholar
Alter, N. (2003). Mouvement et dyschronies dans les organisations. L’Année sociologique, 53, 489–514.Google Scholar
Appleyard, M.M., & Chesbrough, H.W. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 310–321.Google Scholar
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 419–451.Google Scholar
Aten, K., & Thomas, G.F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53, 148–180.Google Scholar
Aversa, P., Haefliger, S., Rossi, A., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2015). From business model to business modelling: Modularity and manipulation. In Business models and modelling: Advances in strategic management (pp. 151–185). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. (2013). Business models and technological Innovation. Long Range Planning, 46, 419–426.Google Scholar
Baden-Fuller, C., & Mangematin, V. (2013). Business models: A challenging agenda. Strategic Organization, 11, 418–427.Google Scholar
Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M.S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43, 156–171.Google Scholar
Baptista, J., Wilson, A.D., Galliers, R.D., & Bynghall, S. (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 322–336.Google Scholar
Bayus, B.L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community. Management Science , 59, 226–244.Google Scholar
Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M.G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I.P., Moeslein, K.M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F.T., Radziwon, A., Rossi-Lamastra, C., Sims, J., & Wal, A.L.J.T. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24, 8–40.Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2003). Why open source software can succeed. Research Policy, 32, 1243–1258.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R.S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin‐off companies. Ind Corp Change, 11, 529–555.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H.W., & Appleyard, M.M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50, 57–76.Google Scholar
Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M.W. (2006). A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Research Policy, 35, 1243–1259.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F.-X., Fomin, V., Haefliger, S., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Rules, practices, and information technology: A trifecta of organizational regulation. Information Systems Research, 29, 755–773.Google Scholar
Edwards, M.R., & Clinton, M.E. (2018). A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment. Higher Education, 1–19.Google Scholar
Fauchart, E., & von Hippel, E. (2008). Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organization Science, 19, 187–201.Google Scholar
Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 401–415.Google Scholar
Franke, N., & von Hippel, E. (2003). Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Research Policy, 32, 1199–1215.Google Scholar
Frey, K., Lüthje, C., & Haag, S. (2011). Whom should firms attract to open innovation platforms? The role of knowledge diversity and motivation. Long Range Planning, Social Software: Strategy, Technology, and Community, 44, 397–420.Google Scholar
Füller, J., Matzler, K., & Hoppe, M. (2008). Brand community members as a source of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 608–619.Google Scholar
Gegenhuber, T., & Dobusch, L. (2017). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 337–354.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., & Krikorian, F. (2018). How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility. Strategic Organization, 16, 241–272.Google Scholar
Haefliger, S., Monteiro, E., Foray, D., & von Krogh, G. (2011). Social software and strategy. Long Range Planning, 44, 297–316.Google Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 298–309.Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Lang, K.R. (2011). Boundary management in online communities: Case studies of the Nine Inch Nails and ccMixter music remix sites. Long Range Planning, 44, 440–457.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25, 529–560.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., & Bednarek, R. (2017). Toward a social practice theory of relational competing. Strategic Management Journal, n/a-n/a.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 537–558.Google Scholar
Jones, M.R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32, 127–157.Google Scholar
Keinz, P., Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2012). Designing the organization for user innovation. Journal of Organization Design, 1, 20–36.Google Scholar
Ketokivi, M., & Castañer, X. (2004). Strategic planning as an integrative device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 337–365.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.Google Scholar
Laasch, O. (2018). An actor-network perspective on business models: How “being responsible” led to incremental but pervasive change. Long Range Planning.Google Scholar
Lakhani, K.R., & von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32, 923–943.Google Scholar
Lanzara, G.F., Vaujany, F.-X. de, Mitev, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2016). Materiality, rules and regulation: New trends in management and organization studies. Springer.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (2017). The Crowdfunded Conservationist Who Wants to Save the World [WWW Document]. Outside Online. URL www.outsideonline.com/2146626/crowdfunded-conservationist-who-wants-save-world (accessed 13.1.18).Google Scholar
Luedicke, M.K., Husemann, K.C., Furnari, S., & Ladstaetter, F. (2017). Radically open strategizing: How the Premium Cola collective takes open strategy to the extreme. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 371–384.Google Scholar
MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., & Baldwin, C.Y. (2006). Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Science, 52, 1015–1030.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1995). A short history of ethics: A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric Age to the twentieth century. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Mack, D.Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, Open Strategy: Transparency and Inclusion in Strategy Processes, 50, 385–396.Google Scholar
Markus, M. (2007). The governance of free/open source software projects: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? Journal of Management and Governance, 11, 151–163.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M.N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.Google Scholar
Moore, G. (2017). Virtue at work: Ethics for individuals, managers, and organizations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. (2012). The virtue of governance, the governance of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 293–318.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.S. (2012). The world in the model: How economists work and think. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neeley, T.B., & Leonardi, P.M. (2018). Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: Passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 922–946.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32, 1179–1198.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. (2008). Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 422–459.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1079–1106.Google Scholar
Padgett, J.F., & Powell, W.W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Piller, F.T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36, 307–318.Google Scholar
Poetz, M.K., & Prügl, R. (2010). Crossing domain-specific boundaries in search of innovation: Exploring the potential of pyramiding*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 897–914.Google Scholar
Quick, K.S., & Feldman, M.S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 272–290.Google Scholar
Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12, 23–49.Google Scholar
Reynaud, J.-D. (1979). Conflit et régulation sociale: Esquisse d’une théorie de la régulation conjointe. Revue Française de Sociologie, 20, 367–376.Google Scholar
Reynaud, J.-D. (1988). Les régulations dans les organisations: Régulation de contrôle et régulation autonome. Revue Française de Sociologie, 31, 5–18.Google Scholar
Roberts, J., Hann, I., & Slaughter, S. (2006). Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Science, 52, 984–999.Google Scholar
Rullani, F., & Haefliger, S. (2013). The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation. Research Policy, 42, 941–953.Google Scholar
Santos, F.M., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (2009). Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 643–671.Google Scholar
Shah, S. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52, 1000–1014.Google Scholar
Spinosa, C., Flores, F., & Dreyfus, H.L. (1997). Disclosing new worlds: Entrepreneurship, democratic action, and the cultivation of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sutanto, J., Tan, C.-H., Battistini, B., & Phang, C.W. (2011). Emergent leadership in virtual collaboration settings: A social network analysis approach. Long Range Planning, Social Software: Strategy, Technology, and Community, 44, 421–439.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2018). Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics. Strategic Organization, 16, 323–351.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1978). Successful industrial products from customer ideas. Journal of Marketing, 42, 39–49.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5, 212–239.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G.F. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14, 209–223.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G., & Haefliger, S. (2010). Opening up design science: The challenge of designing for reuse and joint development. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 232–241.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G.F., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K.R. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 32, 1217–1241.Google Scholar
West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, Open Innovation: New Insights and Evidence, 43, 805–811.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22, 531–544.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, Y., Yokozawa, M., Shinohara, T., & Ishida, T. (2000). Collaboration with Lean Media: How open-source software succeeds. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, pp. 329–338.Google Scholar