Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Open Strategy
- Part II Practices of Open Strategy
- Part III Technological Assemblages for Open Strategy
- Part IV Theoretical Perspectives
- Part V Challenges of Open Strategy
- Index
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2019
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Open Strategy
- Part II Practices of Open Strategy
- Part III Technological Assemblages for Open Strategy
- Part IV Theoretical Perspectives
- Part V Challenges of Open Strategy
- Index
- References
Summary
This Handbook provides foundations for research on a phenomenon, going under many names, that is gripping more and more organizations: Open Strategy. There is a kind of revolution here. Whereas once strategy processes were reserved for senior managers and their immediate advisers, and strategy was highly confidential, now organizations are welcoming new and larger constituencies into strategy making and sharing unprecedented amounts of strategic information both internally and externally. Compared to the old conventions, Open Strategy promises radical advances in strategic inclusiveness and transparency (Whittington et al., 2011; Hautz et al., 2017).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy , pp. 1 - 6Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Aten, K., & Thomas, G. F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 148–180.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(4), 49–61.Google Scholar
Bjelland, O. M., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An inside view of IBM’s “Innovation Jam.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, 4(2), 125–137.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (2009). The twenty-first-century firm: Changing economic organization in international perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L., & Müller-Seitz, G. (2019). Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s Open Strategy process. Organization Studies, 40(3), 343–370.Google Scholar
Financial Reporting Council (2014). Guidance on the Strategic Report. www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/2168919d-398a-41f1-b493-0749cf6f63e8/Guidance-on-the-Strategic-Report.pdf (accessed May 12, 2018).Google Scholar
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (2017). Handbook of middle management strategy process research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298–309.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1727–1748.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L., Gößwein, J., & Beaudette, P. (2017). Open Strategy-Making at the Wikimedia Foundation: A dialogic perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 54(1), 5–35.Google Scholar
Kirk, M. P., & Markov, S. (2016). Come on over: Analyst/investor days as a disclosure medium. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1725–1750.Google Scholar
Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12(2), 251–273.Google Scholar
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 257–292.Google Scholar
Tkacz, N. (2012). From open source to open government: A critique of open politics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 12(4), 386–405.Google Scholar
Turco, C. J. (2016). The conversational firm: Rethinking bureaucracy in the age of social media. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Vicente‐Lorente, J. D. (2001). Specificity and opacity as resource‐based determinants of capital structure: Evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 157–177.Google Scholar
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 649–676.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Basak-Yakis, B., & Cailluet, L. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 531–544.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Yakis-Douglas, B., & Ahn, K. (2015). Wall Street rewards CEOs who talk about their strategies. HBR.org, 28 December. https://hbr.org/2015/12/wall-street-rewards-ceos-who-talk-about-their-strategiesGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Yakis‐Douglas, B., & Ahn, K. (2016). Cheap talk? Strategy presentations as a form of chief executive officer impression management. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2413–2424.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1970). Corporate control and business behavior: An inquiry into the effects of organization form on enterprise behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2017). Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1754–1788.Google Scholar
Yakis-Douglas, B., Angwin, D., Ahn, K., & Meadows, M. (2017). Opening M&A strategy to investors: Predictors and outcomes of transparency during organizational transition. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 411–422.Google Scholar