Making Educational Performance Public

Susan L. Moffitt

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107588141.005

4 - Making Educational Performance Public

Reporting on the Progress of Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2014

Susan L. Moffitt

Show author details

Susan L. Moffitt: Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island

Book contents

Get access

Summary

If it could be published annually from this capital through every school district of the United States that there are states in the Union that have no system of common schools ... It would shame out of their delinquency all the delinquent states.

Representative James Garfield, (R-OH), 1866

The purpose of this letter is to invite you to a small unpublicized conference on methods for assessing the level of educational attainment in the United States. This conference is being sponsored by the Carnegie Corporation with the cooperation of the United States Office of Education.

Letter to Ralph Tyler from John W. Gardner, November 7, 1963

Within the vast terrain of federal level public committees, when do different forms of participation emerge, and what are their implications for bureaucratic administration and democratic accountability? The themes of decentralization and exclusivity that characterized debate over the development of public committees in the twentieth century manifested in participatory processes related to the collection and use of educational statistics and assessments. Looking closely at the development of public committees for educational assessments also reveals variation in the conditions yielding different kinds of participation, as expected. The field of education statistics and assessments allows us to look at a wide spectrum of public participation – from unpublicized participation in nongovernmental venues to commissions composed of nationally prominent individuals to panels of parents and educators to committees consisting of conventionally defined technical experts. Some of these committees have offered only advice. Others have been empowered to make policy. Through this variation, the field of education statistics and assessments gives witness to the limits of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Not all venues for participation in operation after 1972 fall under the auspices of FACA: institutional explanations take us only part of the way in understanding the emergence, use, and impact of participatory processes.

Reflecting the general terrain of American federal public committees, public committees for education statistics and assessments emerged initially from executive branch initiative, though they have not always been under executive branch control. As task conditions vary – more/less agency task expertise, more/less agency task jurisdiction – so too have the forms that participation has taken, ranging from private learning, to promoting executive branch policy, to public educating, to developing new knowledge.

Type: Chapter
Information: Making Policy Public
Participatory Bureaucracy in American Democracy
, pp. 82 - 111

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588141.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kursh, Harry, The United States Office of Education (Philadelphia: Chilton Company, 1965), pp. 10–11Google Scholar

Grant, W. Vance, “Statistics in the US Department of Education: Highlights from the past 120 years,” in 120 Years of American Education: A Statistical Portrait, edited by Snyder, Thomas D. (Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, 1993), p. 1Google Scholar

U.S. General Accounting Office, The National Assessment of Educational Progress: Its Results Need to be Made More Useful (Washington, DC: GPO, 1976), pp. 2–3Google Scholar

Gilford, Dorothy, “NAEP and the US Office of Education, 1971–1974,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), p. 166Google Scholar

Cohen, David K., “Policy and Organization: The Impact of State and Federal Educational Policy on School Governance,” Harvard Educational Review 52 (1982): 474–499CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, David K. and Spillane, James P., “Policy and Practice: The Relations Between Governance and Instruction,” in The Future of Education: Perspectives on National Standards in Education, edited by Cobb, Nina (New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1994), pp. 112–113Google Scholar

Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Biennial Survey of Education in the United States: Statistical Summary of Education 1953–54 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1958), p. 23Google Scholar

Steffes, Tracy, School, Society and the State: A New Education to Govern Modern America, 1890–1940 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ryan, Ann Marie, “Keeping Every Catholic Child in a Catholic School During the Great Depression, 1933–1939,” Catholic Education 11 (2007): 157–175Google Scholar

Hazlett, J. A., A History of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1963–1974 (Doctoral dissertation. University of Kansas, 1974), pp. 352–353Google Scholar

Keppel, Francis, The Necessary Revolution in American Education (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1966), pp. 108–109Google Scholar

Jeffrey, Julie Roy, Education for Children of the Poor: A Study of the Origins and Implementation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1978), p. 62Google Scholar

Munger, Frank J. and Fenno, Richard F., National Politics and Federal Aid to Education (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1962)Google Scholar

Cohen, David and Moffitt, Susan, The Ordeal of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009), pp. 2–3Google Scholar

Jennings, John F., “Chapter 1: A View from Congress,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 13 (1991): 335–338CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, Wayne, “NAEP from Three Different Perspectives,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), p. 309Google Scholar

Greenbaum, William, Garet, Michael S., and Solomon, Ellen R., Measuring Educational Progress: A Study of the National Assessment (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1977), pp. 5, 115, 199Google Scholar

Womer, Frank, What Is National Assessment? (Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States, 1968), p. 1Google Scholar

Galley, Michelle, “Governing Board Considers Scrapping Long-Term NAEP,” Education Week 21 (2001): 22Google Scholar

Dow, Peter B., Schoolhouse Politics: Lessons from the Sputnik Era (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991)CrossRef Google Scholar

Balogh, Brian, Chain Reaction (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 6–7, 22CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehmann, Irvin J., “The Genesis of NAEP,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), pp. 25–92Google Scholar

Morrisett, Lloyd, “An Interview with Lloyd Morrisett,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), p. 129Google Scholar

Mosher, Frederic A., “An Age of Innocence,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), p. 110Google Scholar

Cronbach, Lee, “An Interview with Lee Cronbach,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004)Google Scholar

Selznik, Philip, TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organizations (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1949)Google Scholar

Merwin, J. C. and Womer, F. B., “Evaluation in Assessing the Progress of Education to Provide Bases of Public Understanding and Public Policy,” in National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Educational Evaluation: New Roles, New Means, edited by Tyler, R. W. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969), p. 316Google Scholar

Finley, C. J. and Berdie, F. S., The National Assessment Approach to Exercise Development (Denver, CO: National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1970), p. 48Google Scholar

Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram, The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Press, 2004), pp. 1–2Google Scholar

Gilford, Dorothy, “NAEP and the US Office of Education,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Press, 2004), p. 180Google Scholar

Gardner, John, “An Interview with John Gardner,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), pp. 118–119Google Scholar

Elliott, Emerson and Phillips, Gary, “A View from the NCES,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), pp. 243–244Google Scholar

Selden, Ramsay, “Making NAEP State-By-State,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004)Google Scholar

Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (eds.), The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Press, 2004), pp. 14–17

Linn, Robert L., “The Influence of External Evaluations,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004), p. 299Google Scholar

Alexander, Lamar and James, H. Thomas, The Nation’s Report Card: Improving the Assessment of Student Achievement (Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, 1987), pp. 8–9Google Scholar

“An Interview with Marshall S. Smith. What NAEP Really Could Do,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 2004)