Modelling Nature-based Solutions Integrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning
Book contents
- Modelling Nature-based Solutions
- Modelling Nature-based Solutions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Landscape Modelling and Stakeholder Engagement: Participatory Approaches and Landscape Visualisation
- 2 Agent-based Models of Coupled Social and Natural Systems
- 3 Modelling Nature-based Solutions from Soil Ecosystem Services
- 4 Modelling Water Resources for Nature-based Solutions
- 5 Models at the Service of Marine Nature-based Solutions
- 6 Coastal and Freshwater Flood Models: A Review in the Context of NBS
- 7 Nature-based Solutions to Urban Microclimate Regulation
- 8 Data Mining, Machine Learning and Spatial Data Infrastructures for Scenario Modelling
- 9 Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?
- 10 Integrating Models into Practice – Recommendations
- Appendix: List of Models/Software
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 March 2020
Book contents
- Modelling Nature-based Solutions
- Modelling Nature-based Solutions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Landscape Modelling and Stakeholder Engagement: Participatory Approaches and Landscape Visualisation
- 2 Agent-based Models of Coupled Social and Natural Systems
- 3 Modelling Nature-based Solutions from Soil Ecosystem Services
- 4 Modelling Water Resources for Nature-based Solutions
- 5 Models at the Service of Marine Nature-based Solutions
- 6 Coastal and Freshwater Flood Models: A Review in the Context of NBS
- 7 Nature-based Solutions to Urban Microclimate Regulation
- 8 Data Mining, Machine Learning and Spatial Data Infrastructures for Scenario Modelling
- 9 Can Geodesign Be Used to Facilitate Boundary Management for Planning and Implementation of Nature-based Solutions?
- 10 Integrating Models into Practice – Recommendations
- Appendix: List of Models/Software
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
This book began life as a review of environmental scenario modelling undertaken by the Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU) on behalf of the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Naturvårdsverket) and the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (Havs och vattenmyndigheten). That report focused on several categories of problems which together represent coupled systems with impact on the 16 Environmental Goals set out by the Swedish Government (Prop. 2009/10:155) as its legislative response to domestic and international environmental obligations such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (United Nations, 2015a). The book extends that core to provide global context, via a set of case studies drawn from around the world and to look beyond simply modelling the problem to how such models can help identify solutions, particularly where these rely on natural processes, i.e. nature-based solutions (NBS).
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modelling Nature-based SolutionsIntegrating Computational and Participatory Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management and Planning, pp. 1 - 18Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Aitkenhead, M. J., Albanito, F., Jones, M. B. & Black, H. I. J. 2011. Development and testing of a process-based soil model (MOSES) for ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science, 222, 3795–3810.Google Scholar
Bakker, J. P., Baas, A. C. W., Bartholdy, J., Jones, L., Ruessink, G., Temmerman, S., et al. 2016. Environmental impacts – coastal ecosystems. In: Quante, M. & Colijn, F. (eds.) North Sea Region Climate Change Assessment. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Ball, P. 2014. ‘Caution should be the watchword for scientists trying to predict the future’, Guardian, Wednesday 12 November 2014.Google Scholar
CBD. 1994. Convention on Biological Diversity. www.cbd.int/convention/articles/default.shtml?a=cbd-00Google Scholar
CCFLA. 2015. State of City Climate Finance 2015. New York, NY: Cities Climate Finance Leadership Alliance (CCFLA).Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention: Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Florence.Google Scholar
Demir, I. & Krajewski, W. F. 2013. Towards an integrated Flood Information System: centralized data access, analysis, and visualization. Environmental Modelling & Software, 50, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC. 2007. Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE).Google Scholar
Hassan, R., Scholes, R. & Ash, N. (eds.) 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2018. Global warming of 1.5 C. In: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P., et al. (eds.). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Kanianska, R. 2016. Agriculture and its impact on land‐use, environment, and ecosystem services. In: Almusaed, A. (ed.) Landscape Ecology – the Influences of Land Use and Anthropogenic Impacts of Landscape Creation. London: IntechOpen.Google Scholar
McLane, A., Semeniuk, C., McDemid, G. & Marceau, D. 2011. The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management. Ecological Modelling, 222, 1544–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. & Morrice, J. 2006. Visualisation Tools for Public Participation in the Management of Landscape Change. Aberdeen: The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute.Google Scholar
Mora, C., Dousset, B., Caldwell, I. R., Powell, F. E., Geronimo, R. C., Bielecki, C. R., et al. 2017. Global risk of deadly heat. Nature Climate Change, 7, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musco, F. 2016. Counteracting Urban Heat Island Effects in a Global Climate Change Scenario. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negm, L. M., Youssef, M. A., Skaggs, R. W., Chescheir, G. M. & Jones, J. 2014. DRAINMOD-DSSAT model for simulating hydrology, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and crop growth for drained crop land. Agricultural Water Management, 137, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, R. J. 1995. Coastal megacities and climate change. GeoJournal, 37, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2008. Environmental Performance of Agriculture in OECD Countries since 1990. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. & Walker, J. 1994. Rules, Games, & Common Pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G. D., Cumming, G. S. & Carpenter, S. R. 2003. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology, 17, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, J., Silbernagel, J., Miller, N., Swaty, R., White, M. & Nixon, K. 2012. Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 229, 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, N. & Birnie, R. 2008. Spatial sampling and public opinion in environmental management: a case study of the Ythan catchment. Land Use Policy, 25, 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, N. & Ode-Sang, A., 2015. A Review on the State of the Art in Scenario Modelling for Environmental Management. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.Google Scholar
Steinitz, C. 2012. A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Redlands, CA: Esri.Google Scholar
Thunberg, G. 2018. Climate Justice Now. Poland: COP24. Reported in full by Gül Tüysüz for CNN.Google Scholar
UNECE. 1998. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Århus.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2015a. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: UN.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2015b. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance. New York, NY: UN.Google Scholar
Yu, S., Cui, B., Gibbons, P., Yan, J., Ma, X., Xie, T., et al. 2017. Towards a biodiversity offsetting approach for coastal land reclamation: coastal management implications. Biological Conservation, 214, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.