Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hoskins, Zachary 2016. Punishment. Analysis, p. anw022.

    Tanguay-Renaud, François 2013. Criminalizing the State. Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 255.

    Wringe, Bill 2012. Collective Agents and Communicative Theories of Punishment. Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 436.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

8 - The Distributive Effect of Collective Punishment

Summary

Collective punishment has a notorious reputation among moral philosophers. If we take it to mean the imposition of punitive measures on groups (I elaborate on this meaning later in the chapter), collective punishment raises two normative issues that many philosophers find particularly troubling. The first concerns the extent to which groups are the appropriate subjects of punishment. Here the question is, are groups moral agents that are responsible for their actions and should be held to account when they act wrongly? The second difficulty concerns the impact of collective punishment on group members. Here the question is, is it justified to impose burdens on individuals by virtue of the fact that their group caused a collective harm?

To see these problems more clearly, consider the proposed academic boycott against Israeli universities (the subject of heated debates in recent years in British academia). Briefly, the proponents of the boycott recommend the elimination of professional ties with Israeli academic institutions, in light of the latter's alleged support of the Israeli government policies. However, does it make sense to argue that academic institutions act in a condemnable manner? Are institutions themselves the proper subject of moral reactions such as anger, resentment, or condemnation? Moreover, even if it can be shown that Israeli academic institutions acted in a way that merits condemnation, boycotting them will harm the individual academics who work in those institutions. Can this distributive effect be justified?

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing
  • Online ISBN: 9780511976780
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976780
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
French, Peter, Collective and Corporate Responsibility (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984)
May, Larry, The Morality of Groups: Collective Responsibility, Group-Based Harm, and Corporate Rights (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987)
Pettit, Philip, “Groups with Minds of Their Own,” in Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality, ed. Schmitt, Frederick F. (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003)
Kutz, Christopher, Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age (Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 191–97
Barry, Christian, “Applying the Contribution Principle,” in Global Institutions and Responsibilities: Achieving Global Justice, ed. Christian Barry and Thomas Pogge (Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, 2005)
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 105–6
Shue, Henry, “Global Environment and International Inequality,” International Affairs 75 (1999), 531–45