Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:51:07.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Advanced Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Paul G. Tucker
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Industrial design tends to be multidisciplinary and multi-physics, with multiple objectives involving coupled systems. Industrial products are complex and there are potentially hundreds of constraints. Treating the system as holistically as possible is of critical importance if invalid or poor designs are to be avoided.

As noted, system coupling can often be important. For example, as noted by Spalart and Bogue (2003) an ultimate aerospace vision would be to model the coupled airframe, engine and pilot interaction. The latter element also would need to include psychological response to events. The analysis might well encompass the need to account for aerodynamics, heat transfer and multi-phase flow. It could include the need to look at structural integrity in terms of peak stress, thermal or fatigue (both high and low cycle) failure and aeroelastic response. Product cost and weight are also key factors, the latter being highly critical for most aerospace applications.

The use of formal design optimization, involving numerous variations of design variables, has now become relatively standard industrial practice. Then, since coupled simulations are necessary low-order models become especially important. Also, there is the likelihood of geometric and boundary condition uncertainties and hence the need for a stochastic analysis level on top of potentially expensive deterministic simulation runs. Hence, this all furthers the need for lower order models. Therefore, with advanced simulations in mind, in this chapter, design optimization, coupled problems and low-order models are considered together. As part of low-order modelling it is necessary to consider the various truncated forms of the Navier-Stokes equations discussed in Chapter 2.

Notably, many industrial simulations involve a wide range of scales (i.e., they are multi-scale). They can also be multi-physics in nature. Hence, the modelling of multi-scale problems is also briefly considered along with more multi-physics aspects such as multi-phase flow, acoustics and fluid solid coupling. First design optimization is discussed. A critical aspect of this is producing low-order surrogate models. Hence, the design optimization discussion is followed by specifically considering low-order models. Then coupled calculations are considered, this again having the need for low-order models. Then, finally, more multi-physics and multi-scale modelling aspects are very briefly considered.

Design Optimization

Key Elements and General Process

Formal design optimization is important, giving an automatic process for verifiably seeking an improved design. The design optimization can be performed at various fidelities and stages of product design.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADAMCZYK, J. 1985. Model equation for simulating flows in multistage turbomachinery. ASME, International Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibit, 30th, Houston, TX, Mar. 18-21 ASME Paper No. 85-GT-226.
AGARWAL, A. & MORRIS, P. J. 2000. Direct simulation of acoustic scattering on a rotorcraft fuselage. Sixth Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. June AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2000–2030.
ALONSO, J., HAHN, S., HAM, F., HERRMANN, M. & IACCARINO, G. 2006. Chimps: A high performance scalable module for multi-physics simulations. 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. July, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2006-5274.
BAILLY, C. & JUVE, D. 1999. A stochastic approach to compute subsonic noise using linearized Euler equations. Fith AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, May, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-99-1872.
BAKKER, C., PARKS, G. T. & JARRETT, J. P. 2012. On the application of differential geometry to MDO. Twelth Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA Paper No. 2012-5556.
BANIM, R., LAMB, R. & BERGEON, M. 2006. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of fuel tank sloshing. Twenty fith International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 3–8 September 2006, Hamburg, Germany, Paper No. ICAS 2006-2.7.4
BARDOUX, F. & LEBOUEF, F. 2001. Impact of deterministic correlations on the steady flow field. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 215, 687–698.Google Scholar
BARTELS, R. & SAYMA, A. 2007. Computational aeroelastic modelling of airframes and turbomachinery: progress and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1859), 2469–2499.Google Scholar
BARTON, I. E. 1996. Exponential-Lagrangian tracking schemes applied to Stokes law. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 118, 85–89.Google Scholar
BATTEN, P., SPALART, P. R. & TERRACOL, M. 2007. Use of hybrid RANS-LES for acoustic source prediction. In HUTTL, T., WAGNER, C., SAGAUT, P. (eds.), Large-Eddy Simulation for Acoustics, Cambridge University Press.
BEAUGENDRE, H., MORENCY, F., GALLIZIO, F. & LAURENS, S. 2011. Computation of ice shedding trajectories using cartesian grids, penalization, and level sets. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2011, 15.Google Scholar
BENDER, E. E., ANDERSON, B. H. & YAGLE, P. G. 1999. Vortex generator modelling for Navier-Stokes codes. ASME Paper No. FEDSM99-6929.
BENICHOU, E. & TRÉBINJAC, I. 2014. Application of an analytical method to locate a mixing plane in a supersonic compressor. ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. ASME Paper No. GT2014-25103.
BENNING, R. M., BECKER, T. M, & DELGADO, A., 2001. Initial studies of predicting flow fields with an ANN hybrid. Advances in Engineering Software, 32, 895–901.Google Scholar
BLAKE, J., THOMPSON, D., RAPS, D. & STROBL, T. 2015. Simulating the freezing of supercooled water droplets impacting a cooled substrate. AIAA Journal, 53(7), 1725–1739.Google Scholar
BONAIUTI, D. & ZANGENEH, M. 2009. On the coupling of inverse design and optimization techniques for the multiobjective, multipoint design of turbomachinery blades. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 133(1), 021014.Google Scholar
BOYLE, R. J. & STRIPF, M. 2009. Simplified approach to predicting rough surface transition. Journal of Turbomachinery, 131, 041020.Google Scholar
BUIS, S., PIACENTINI, A. & DéCLAT, D. 2005. PALM: a computational framework for assembling high performance computing applications. Concurrent Computing,18(2), 231–245.Google Scholar
BUSBY, J., SONDAK, D., STAUBACH, R. & DAVIS, R. 2000. Deterministic stress modeling of hot gas segregation in a turbine. Transactions of the ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 62, 62–67.Google Scholar
CARLSON, H. A. & FENG, J. Q. 2005. Computational models for nonlinear aeroelasticity. 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper No. 2005-1085.
CHIMA, R. V., CONNERS, T. R. & WAYMAN, T. R. 2010a. Coupled Analysis of an Inlet and Fan for a Quiet Supersonic Jet, NASA/TM-2010-216350.
CHIMA, R. V., AREND, D. J., CASTNER, R. S., SLATER, J. W. & TRUAX, P. P. 2010b. CFD models of a serpentine inlet, fan, and nozzle, NASA/TM-2010-216349.
CLEARY, P. W. & PRAKASH, M. 2004. Discrete-element modelling and smoothed particle hydrodynamics: potential in the environmental sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 362, 2003–2030.Google Scholar
COOPER, A. J. & PEAKE, N. 2000. Trapped acoustic modes in aeroengine intakes with swirling flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 419, 151–175.Google Scholar
CROWE, C. T., SHARMA, M. P. & STOCK, D. E. 1977. The Particle-Source-In Cell (PSI-CELL) model for gas-droplet flows. Journal of Fluid Engineering, 99(2), 325–332.Google Scholar
DECK, S., GAND, F., BRUNET, V. & KHELIL, S. B. 2014. High-fidelity simulations of unsteady civil aircraft aerodynamics: stakes and perspectives. Application of zonal detached eddy simulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 2013–0325.Google Scholar
DEFOE, J., NARKAJ, A. & SPAKOVSZKY, Z. 2009. A novel MPT noise prediction methodology for highly-integrated propulsion systems with inlet flow distortion. 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2009-3366.
DEMIRDŽIĆ, I. & PERIĆ, M. 1988. Space conservation law in finite volume calculations of fluid flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 8, 1037–1050.Google Scholar
DENTON, J. 1992. The calculation of three-dimensional viscous flow through multistage turbomachines. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 114, 18.Google Scholar
DHOPADE, P., NEELY, A. J., YOUNG, J. & SHANKAR, K. 2012. High-cycle fatigue of fan blades accounting for fluid-structure interaction. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012, ASME Paper No. GT2012-68102.
DOI, H. 2002. Fluid/structure coupled aeroelastic computations for transonic flows in turbomachinery. DPhil Thesis, Stanford University, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
DUCHAINE, F., CORPRON, A., PONS, L., MOUREAU, V., NICOUD, F. & POINSOT, T. 2009. Development and assessment of a coupled strategy for conjugate heat transfer with Large Eddy Simulation: Application to a cooled turbine blade. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 30, 1129–1141.Google Scholar
DUDEK, J. C. 2005. An empirical model for vane-type generators in a Navier-Stokes code. AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2005-1003.
DUDEK, J. C. 2010. Modelling vortex generators in the wind – US code, NASA/TM-2010-216744.
EASTWOOD, S. J., TUCKER, P. G., XIA, H. & KLOSTERMEIER, C. 2009. Developing large eddy simulation for turbomachinery applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367, 2999–3013.Google Scholar
EL HACHEMI, M., HASSAN, O., MORGAN, K., ROWSE, D. & WEATHERILL, N. 2004. A low-order unstructured-mesh approach for computational electromagnetics in the time domain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 362, 445–469.Google Scholar
ENGELMAN, M. S. & SANI, R. L. 1986. Finite element simulation of incompressible fluid flows with a free/moving surface. Computational Techniques for Fluid Flow, 5, 47–74.Google Scholar
ERDOS, J. I., ALZNER, E. & MCNALLY, W. 1976. Numerical solution of periodic transonic flow through a fanstage. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 9th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, San Diego, California. AIAA Paper No. AIAA-76-369.
EWERT, R., SCHRODER, W., 2003. Acoustic perturbation equations based on flow decomposition via source filtering. Journal of Computational Physics, 188, 365–398.Google Scholar
FORRESTER, I. J. & KEANE, A. J. 2009. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 45, 50–79.Google Scholar
FOSSATI, M., KHURRAM, R. & HABASHI, W. 2012. An ALE mesh movement scheme for long‐term in‐flight ice accretion. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 68, 958–976.Google Scholar
FRIED, E. & IDELCHIK, I. E. 1989. Flow Resistance: A Design Guide for Engineers, Hemisphere.
FUJII, K. 2014. Impact of cutting-edge CFD over the finding of separation flow control mechanism with micro devices. Submitted to the Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A., 372, 20130326. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0326)Google Scholar
GANGWAR, A. 2001. Source term modeling of rectangular flow cavities. MSc Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Department of Aerospace Engineering.
GANINE, V., HILLS, N. J. & LAPWORTH, B. L. 2013. Nonlinear acceleration of coupled fluid–structure transient thermal problems by Anderson mixing. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids, 71(8), 939–959.Google Scholar
GILES, M. B. 1997. Stability analysis of numerical interface conditions in fluid–structure thermal analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 25(4), 421–436.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, M. E. 2003. A generalized acoustic analogy. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 488, 315–333.Google Scholar
GONG, Y. 1998. A computational model for rotating stall inception and inlet distortions in multistage compressors. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
HALL, E. 1997. Aerodynamic modelling of multistage compressor flow fields – Part 2: Modelling deterministic stresses. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Part G, 212, 91–107.Google Scholar
HALL, K. C., THOMAS, J. P. & CLARK, W. S. 2002. Computation of unsteady nonlinear flows in cascades using a harmonic balance technique. AIAA Journal, 40, 879–886.Google Scholar
HANIMANN, L., MANGANI, L., CASARTELLI, E., MOKULYS, T. & MAURI, S. 2013. Development of a novel mixing plane interface using a fully implicit averaging for stage analysis. ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Paper No. GT2013-94390.
HARLOW, F. & WELCH, J. 1965. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface. Physics of Fluids, 8(12), 2182.Google Scholar
HASSAN, O., MORGAN, K. & WEATHERILL, N. 2007. Unstructured mesh methods for the solution of the unsteady compressible flow equations with moving boundary components. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society – A, 15, 2531–2552.Google Scholar
HAYASHI, R. & YAMAMOTO, M. 2013. Numerical simulation on ice accretion phenomena in rotor-stator interaction field. ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Paper No. GT2013-95448.
HE, L. 2010. Fourier methods for turbomachinery applications. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 46(8), 329–341.Google Scholar
HE, L. 2012. Block-spectral approach to film-cooling modelling. Journal of Turbomachinery, 134(2).Google Scholar
HE, L. 2013. Fourier spectral modelling for multi-scale aero-thermal analysis. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 27(2).Google Scholar
HIELD, P. 1996. A study of the flow capacity of a low hub-tip ratio high speed fan for Pegasus uprate applications using a time-marching axisymmetric throughflow. Rolls-Royce-Royce plc, Technical Report No. DNS26773.Google Scholar
HIELD, P. 2008. Semi-inverse design applied to an eight stage transonic axial flow compressor. ASME Turbo Expo 2008: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, ASME Paper No. GT2008-50430.
HOLMES, D. G. 2008. Mixing planes revisited: A steady mixing plane approach designed to combine high levels of conservation and robustness. ASME Turbo Expo 2008: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. ASME Paper No. GT2008-51296.
HOWELL, J. R. 1982. A catalog of radiation configuration factors, McGraw-Hill.
HUANG, J., CARRICA, P. M. & STERN, F. 2012. A geometry‐based level set method for curvilinear overset grids with application to ship hydrodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 68, 494–521.Google Scholar
ILAK, M. & ROWLEY, C. W. 2008. Modelling of transitional channel flow using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition. Physics of Fluids, 20(3), 034103-034103-17.Google Scholar
JEFFERSON-LOVEDAY, R., NORTHALL, J. & TUCKER, P. 2012. Implementation of an advanced plenum boundary condition for turbine design calculations. ASME Turbo Expo 2012. Paper No. GT2012-68090.
JOO, W. G. & HYNES, T. P. 1997. The application of actuator disks to calculations of the flow in turbofan installations. Journal of Turbomachinery, 199, 723–732.Google Scholar
JUN, L. 1986. Computer modelling of flows with a free surface. PhD Thesis, University of London.
KEANE, A. J. & SCANLAN, J. P. 2007. Design search and optimization in aerospace engineering. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365, (1859), 2501–2559.Google Scholar
KERSKEN, H.-P., ASHCROFT, G., FREY, C., PUTZ, O., STUER, H. & SCHMITT, S. 2012. Validation of a linearized Navier-Stokes based flutter prediction tool, Part 1: numerical methods. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012, ASME Paper No. GT2012-68018.
KINGSLEY, G. M., SIEGEL, J. M., HARRAND, V. J., LAWRENCE, C. & LUKER, J. 1998. Development of a multidisciplinary computing environment (MDICE). Seventh AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA Paper No. 98-4738.
KIRKPATRICK, S., GELATT, Jr, C. D. & VECCHI, M. P. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science,220(4598), 671–680.Google Scholar
LARSSON, J. & WANG, Q. 2014. The prospect of using large eddy and detached eddy simulations in engineering design, and the research required to get there. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130329.Google Scholar
LELE, S. K. & NICHOLS, J. W. 2014. A second golden age of aeroacoustics?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130321.Google Scholar
LEMKE, M., REISS, J. & SESTERHENN, J. 2014. Adjoint based optimisation of reactive compressible flows. Combustion and Flame, 161, 2552–2564.Google Scholar
LEUENBERGER, H. & PERSON, R. 1956. Compilation of radiation shape factors for cylindrical assemblies. ASME Paper No. 56-A-144.
LIEBECK, R. R. & ORMSBEE, A. I. 1970. Optimization of airfoils for maximum lift. Journal of Aircraft, 7(5), 409–416.Google Scholar
LIGHTHILL, M. J. 1952. On sound generated aerodynamically I – General theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 211, 564–587.Google Scholar
LO IACONO, G. & TUCKER, P. G. 2004. LES computation of particle transport in rib roughened passages. Proceedings of CHT-04, Advances in Computational Heat Transfer III, (eds G. de Vahl Davis and E. Leonardi), Paper No. CHT-04-103.
LO IACONO, G., TUCKER, P. G. & REYNOLDS, A.M. 2005. Predictions for particle deposition from LES of ribbed channel flow. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 26, 558–568.Google Scholar
LOIODICE, S., TUCKER, P. G. & WATSON, J. 2010. Coupled open rotor engine intake simulations. Forty eigth AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January, Orlando, Florida, Paper No. AIAA-2010-840.
LONG, C. 1986. Transient analysis of temperature measurements on discs of the RB 199 H.P. vented rotor compressor. Report no. 86/TFMRC/87. School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Sussex.
LONGLEY, J. 1997. Calculating the flow field behaviour of high-speed multi-stage compressors. ASME Paper No. 97-GT-468.
LUKOVIC, B. 2002. Modeling unsteadiness in steady simulations with neural network generated lumped determinstic source terms. D.Phil Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Department of Aerospace Engineering.
MARONGIU, J.-C., LEBOEUF, F., CARO, J. & PARKINSON, E. 2010. Free surface flows simulations in Pelton turbines using an hybrid SPH-ALE method. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48, 40–49.Google Scholar
MARONGIU, J., LEBOEUF, F. & PARKINSON, E. 2007. Numerical simulation of the flow in a Pelton turbine using the meshless method smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a new simple solid boundary treatment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 221, 849–856.Google Scholar
MEDD, A. J., DANG, T. Q. & LAROSILIERE, L. M. 2003. 3D inverse design loading strategy for transonic axial compressor blading. ASME Turbo Expo 2003, collocated with the 2003 International Joint Power Generation Conference, ASME Paper No. GT2003-38501.
MEDIC, G., KALITZIN, G., YOU, D., VAN DER WEIDGE, E., ALONSO, J. J. & PITSCH, H. 2007. Integrated RANS/LES Computations of an Entire Gas Turbine Jet Engine. Forty fith Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. AIAA Paper No. 2007-1117.
MENEVEAU, C. & KATZ, J. 2002. A deterministic stress model for rotor-stator interactions in simulations of average-passage flow. Transactions of the ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124, 550–554.Google Scholar
MILOJEVIÉ, D. 1990. Lagrangian stochastic‐deterministic (LSD) predictions of particle dispersion in turbulence. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 7, 181–190.Google Scholar
MINCU, D.-C. & MANOHA, E. 2012. Numerical and experimental characterization of fan noise installation effects. ERCOFTAC Bulletin, 90, 21–27.Google Scholar
MISHRA, A., MANI, K., MAVRIPLIS, D. & SITARAMAN, J. 2013. Time dependent adjoint-based optimization for coupled aeroelastic problems. Thirty first AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. AIAA Paper No. 2013–2906.
MIYATA, H. & NISHIMURA, S. 1985. Finite difference simulation of non-linear ship waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 157, 327–357.Google Scholar
MONTOMOLI, F., HODSON, H. & LAPWORTH, L. 2011. RANS–URANS in axial compressor, a design methodology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 225, 363–374.Google Scholar
MORRIS, P., LONG, L., BANGALORE, A. & WANG, Q. 1997. A parallel three-dimensional computational aeroacoustics method using nonlinear disturbance equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 133(1), 56–74.Google Scholar
MUIR, E. R. & FRIEDMANN, P. P. 2014. Aeroelastic response of bird-damaged fan blades using a coupled CFD/CSD framework. Fifty fith AIAA/ASMe/ASCE/AHS/SC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Paper No. AIAA 2014-0334.
NILL-AHMADABADI, M., HAJILOUY-BENISI, A., GHADAK, F. & DURALI, M. 2010. A novel 2D incompressible viscous inverse design method for internal flows using flexible string algorithm. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 132(3), 031401.Google Scholar
NING, W. & HE, L. 2001. Some modeling issues on trailing-edge vortex shedding. AIAA Journal, 39(5), 787–793.Google Scholar
ORKWIS, P., TURNER, M. & BARTER, J. 2002. Linear deterministic source terms for hot streak simulations. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 18(2), 383–389.Google Scholar
OZYORUK, Y. & LONG, L. N. 1997. Multigrid acceleration of a high-resolution. AIAA Journal, 35(3), 428–433.Google Scholar
PAGE, J. H., HIELD, P. & TUCKER, P. G. 2013. Inverse design of 3D multi-stage transonic fans at dual operating points. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 136(4), 041008.Google Scholar
PAGE, J., WATSON, R., ALI, Z., TUCKER, P. & HIELD, P. 2015. Advances of turbomachinery design optimization. AIAA SciTech Conference, 5–9 January, Kissimmee, Florida. AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2015-0629.
PAN, J. & LOTH, E. 2005. Detached eddy simulations for iced airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, 42, 1452–1461.Google Scholar
PINELLI, A., NAQAVI, I. Z., PIOMELLI, U. & FAVIER, J. 2010. Immersed-boundary methods for general finite-difference and finite-volume Navier–Stokes solvers. Journal of Computational Physics, 229, 9073–9091.Google Scholar
PITSCH, H. 2006. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 38, 453–482.Google Scholar
POTSDAM, M. A. & GURUSWAMY, G. P. 2001. A parallel multiblock mesh movement scheme for complex aeroelastic applications. Thirty ninth Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2001-0716.
RAHMAN, F., VISSER, J. A. & MORRIS, R. M. 2005. Capturing sudden increase in heat transfer on the suction side of a turbine blade using a Navier-Stokes solver. Journal of Turbomachienery, 127(3), 552–556.Google Scholar
RAMAMURTHY, R. & GHALY, W. 2010. Dual point redesign of an axial compressor airfoil using a viscous inverse design method. ASME 2014 Twelth Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, ASME Paper No. GT2010–23400.
ROIDL, B. & GHALY, G. 2011. Redesign of a low speed turbine stage using a new viscous inverse design method. ASME Journal of Turbomachienery, 133(1), 011009.Google Scholar
SAITO, H. & SCRIVEN, L. E. 1981. Study of coating flow by the finite element method. Journal of Computational Physics, 42, 53–76.Google Scholar
SALVADORI, S., RICCIO, G., INSINNA, M., & MARTELLI, F. 2012. Analysis of combustor/vane interaction with decoupled and loosely coupled approaches. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo GT2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, ASME Paper No. GT2012-69038.
SANCES, D. J., GANGADHARAN, S. N., SUDERMANN, J. E. & MARSELL, B. 2010. CFD fuel slosh modeling of fluid-structure interaction in spacecraft propellant tanks with diaphragms. Proceedings of Fifty first AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, Florida, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2010–2955.
SCHLICHTING, H. & GERSTEN, K. 2000. Boundary-layer Theory, Springer.
SCOTTI, A. 2006. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flows with boundary roughened with virtual sandpaper. Physics of Fluids (1994–present), 18, 031701.Google Scholar
SECUNDOV, A., BIRCH, S. & TUCKER, P. 2007. Propulsive jets and their acoustics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365(1859), 2443–2467.Google Scholar
SHEVTSOV, M., SOUPIKOV, A. & KAPUSTIN, E. 2007. Highly parallel fast kd-tree construction for interactive ray tracing of dynamic scenes. EUROGRAPHICS, 26(3).Google Scholar
SHUR, M. L., SPALART, P. R. & STRELETS, M. K. 2005. Noise prediction for increasingly complex jets, Part I: Methods and tests. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 4(34), 247–266.Google Scholar
SILVA, W. A. & BARTELS, R. E. 2004. Development of reduced-order models for aeroelastic analysis and flutter prediction using the CFL3Dv6.0 code. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 19, 729–745.Google Scholar
SINGAL, V., BAJAJB, J., AWALGAONKARA, N. & TIBDEWALC, S. 2014. CFD Analysis of a Kerosene Fuel Tank to Reduce Liquid Sloshing. Twenty-Fourth DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, 1365–1371, Elsevier.
SPALART, P. R. & BOGUE, D. R. 2003. The role of CFD in aerodynamics, off-design. Aeronautical Journal, 107(1072), 323–329.Google Scholar
STOLLENWERK, S. & KUGELER, E. 2011. Unsteady flow modelling using deterministic flux terms. Ninth European Turbomachinery Conference, Paper No. 161.
SUSSMAN, M., SMEREKA, P. & OSHER, S. 1994. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 114, 146–159.Google Scholar
TADDEI, S. R. & LAROCCA, F. 2014. An actuator disk model of incidence and deviation for RANS-based throughflow analysis. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 136, 021001-1.Google Scholar
TANNER, R. I., NICKELL, R. E. & BILGER, R. W. 1975. Finite element methods for the solution of some incompressible non-Newtonian fluid mechanics problems with free surfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 6, 155–174.Google Scholar
TERRACOL, M., MANOHA, E., HERRERO, C., LABOURASSE, E., REDONNET, S. & SAGAUT, P. 2005. Hybrid methods for airframe noise numerical prediction. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 19, 197–227.Google Scholar
TOULOUKIAN, Y. S. & DEWITT, D. P. 1970. Thermophysical Properties of Matter – The TPRC Data Series, Vol. 7: Thermal Radiative Properties. IFI / Plenum.
TUCKER, P. 1993. Numerical and experimental investigation of flow structure and heat transfer in a rotating cavity with an axial throughflow of cooling air. D.Phil. Thesis, The University of Sussex, School of Engineering.
TUCKER, P. G. 1997a. CFD Applied to Electronic Systems: A Review. Trans. IEEE (CPMTA) 20(4), 518–529.Google Scholar
TUCKER, P. G. 1997b. Numerical precision and dissipation errors in rotating flows. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 7(7), 647–658.Google Scholar
TUCKER, P. G. 2001a. Computation of unsteady internal flows, Springer.
TUCKER, P. G. 2011b. Computation of unsteady turbomachinery flows, Part 1 – Progress and challenges. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 47(7), October, 522–545.
TUCKER, P. G. 2013. Unsteady computational fluid dynamics in aeronautics, Springer.
TUCKER, P. G., EASTWOOD, S., KLOSTERMEIER, C., XIA, H., RAY, P., TYACKE, J. & DAWES, W. 2012. Hybrid LES approach for practical turbomachinery flows – Part 2: Further applications. Journal of Turbomachinery, 134, 021024.Google Scholar
TUCKER, P. G. & PAN, Z. 2001. URANS Computations for a complex internal isothermal flow. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 190, 2893–2907.Google Scholar
TURNER, M. G., REED, J. A., RYDER, R. & VERES, J. P. 2004. Multi-fidelity simulation of a turbofan engine with results zoomed into mini-maps for a zero-d cycle simulation. ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Paper No. GT2004-53956, 219–230.
TYACKE, J. C., NAQAVI, I. Z., & TUCKER, P. G. 2015. Body force modelling of internal geometry for jet noise prediction: Advances in simulation of wing and nacelle stall (RADESPIEL, R., NIEHUIS, R., KROLL, N., BEHRENDS, K. (Eds.)), Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Springer, 131, 97–109.
VERDICCHIO, J. A., CHEW, J. W. & HILLS, N. J. 2001. Coupled fluid/solid heat transfer computation for turbine discs. Proceedings of ASME Turbomachinery Exposition 2001, ASME Paper No. GT2001-0205.
VERSTEEG, H. K. & MALALASEKERA, W. 2007. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method, Pearson, Prentice-Hall.
VOIGT, C., FREY, C. & KERSKEN, H.-P. 2010. Development of a generic surface mapping algorithm for fluid structure-interaction simulations in turbomachinery. 5th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics ECCOMAS CFD, (eds. J. C. F. Pereira, A. Sequeira, and J. M. C. Pereira), Lisbon, Portugal, 14-17 June.
WANG, D. X. & HE, L. 2010. Adjoint aerodynamic design optimization for blades in multistage turbomachines – Part 1: methodology and verification. Journal of Turbomachinery, 132, 021011-1.Google Scholar
WANG, Q. 2014. Convergence of the least squares shadowing method for computing derivative of ergodic averages. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 52, 156–170.Google Scholar
WANG, Z. & WANG, Z. J. 2005. Multi-phase flow computation with semi-Lagrangian level set method on adaptive Cartesian grids. AIAA Paper No. 2005-1390.
WATSON, R. & TUCKER, P. G. 2014. Evolving solutions: distributed computing and cutback trailing edges. 52nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 13–17 January, Maryland, Paper No. AIAA-2014-0227.
WATSON, R., TUCKER, P. G. & WANG, Z. 2014. Unsteady simulation paradigms for trailing edge. 52nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Paper No. AIAA-2014-1425.
WELLBORN, S. R., TOLCHINSKY, I. & OKIISHI, T. H. 1999. Modeling shrouded stator cavity flows in axial-flow compressors. Journal of Turbomachinery, 122, 55–61.Google Scholar
WENDT, B. J. & BIESIADNY, T. 2001. Initial circulation and peak vorticity behavior of vortices shed from airfoil vortex generators, NASA/CR-2001-211144.
WILHELM, R. 2002. Inverse design method for designing isolated and wing-mounted engine nacelles. Journal of Aircraft, 39(6), 989–995.Google Scholar
XU, L. 2003. Assessing viscous body forces for unsteady calculations. Journal of Turbomachinery, 125, 425–432.Google Scholar
XU, L. 2012. Transonic axial flow fans, cambridge turbomachinery course. The Møller Centre, 2, 475–513.Google Scholar
XU, L., HYNES, T. & DENTON, J. 2003. Towards long length scale unsteady modelling in turbomachines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 217(1), 75.Google Scholar
ZHANG, Y. 2015. Turbulent unsteady separated flows in multidisciplinary computational fluid dynamics applications. PhD Thesis, McGill University.
ZHANG, Y., HABASHI, W. G. & KHURRAM, R. A. 2013. A hybrid RANS/LES method for turbulent flow over iced wings. Twenty first Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, 6–9 May, Quebec, Canada.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Advanced Simulation
  • Paul G. Tucker, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Advanced Computational Fluid and Aerodynamics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139872010.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Advanced Simulation
  • Paul G. Tucker, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Advanced Computational Fluid and Aerodynamics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139872010.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Advanced Simulation
  • Paul G. Tucker, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Advanced Computational Fluid and Aerodynamics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139872010.007
Available formats
×