Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T23:44:18.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Coalitions, policies, and distribution: Esping-Andersen's Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism

from Part II - Agenda-setting work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

By
Jane Gingrich
Edited by
James Mahoney  and
Kathleen Thelen
Jane Gingrich
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
James Mahoney
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Kathleen Thelen
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

The publication of Gøsta Esping-Andersen's foundational work Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism in 1990 marked a decisive moment in the study of cross-national social policy, creating a research legacy enduring over time, across disciplines, and across methodological approaches. What explains this profound influence? This chapter argues that Three Worlds was so deeply successful in generating a productive research agenda precisely because of the way that Esping-Andersen grounds his understanding of the welfare state in comparative-historical analysis.

The core argument in Three Worlds is that advanced capitalist democracies vary not only in how much they spend on social welfare but also in how they spend on it. Understanding welfare capitalism requires examining how packages of institutions, both in the state and the market, interact to produce particular types of distributive outcomes. It is crucial to emphasize that this insight, which is now widely internalized in the contemporary political economy debate, was extremely novel at the time, challenging previous work presenting welfare development in more or less linear terms. Both the core typology of Three Worlds and Esping-Andersen's broader analytic shift in emphasis toward understanding welfare institutions as the product of particular historical struggles opened the space for a vastly productive research agenda.

First, Esping-Andersen's aim is to understand one of the central large-scale shifts in twentieth-century politics: the rise and operation of welfare institutions. To do so, he argues that we cannot hive off a single institution (e.g., gross social spending, labor market policy) from other institutions. Nor can we understand the way institutions operate in an abstract or temporally independent way. Rather, Three Worlds argues that the structure of the labor market and the state work in tandem, in configurations, to shape broader power relationships and outcomes.

Second, Esping-Andersen, like many both before and after him, conceptualizes the politics of the welfare state as a product of the tension between the inequality produced by capitalism and the equality of parliamentary democracy. Yet, the resolution of this tension is neither uniform nor linear but a product of particular political struggles.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis , pp. 67 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlquist, John, and Breunig, Christian. 2012. “Model-Based Clustering and Typologies in the Social Sciences.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alber, Jens. 1995. “A Framework for the Comparative Study of Social Services.” Journal of European Social Policy 5 (2): 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Beramendi, Pablo. 2012. “Left Parties, Poor Voters, and Electoral Participation in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (6): 714–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Ben W. 2008. “University Challenges: Explaining Institutional Change in Higher Education.” World Politics 60 (2): 189–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, Wil, and Gelissen, John. 2002. “Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-the-Art Report.” Journal of European Social Policy 12 (2): 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Peter. 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Peter 1992. “The Welfare State for Historians. A Review Article.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 34 (4): 695–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis Geoffrey, and Mitchell, Deborah. 1991. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or Four? Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series No. 63. Luxembourg: LIS Cross-National Data Center.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1985. Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, and Korpi, Walter. 1984. “Social Policy as Class Politics in Post-War Capitalism: Scandinavia, Austria, and Germany.” In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by Goldthorpe, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio. 1996. “The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1990. Women, the State, and Welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet C., and Meyers, Marcia. 2003. Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2004. “The Dependent Variable Problem within the Study of Welfare State Retrenchment: Defining the Problem and Looking for Solutions.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 6 (1): 3–14.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2011. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David W.. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, Silja. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyn, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huo, Jingjing, Nelson, Moira, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. “Decommodification and Activation in Social Democratic Policy: Resolving the Paradox.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (1): 5–20.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2005. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben 2010. “Democracy and Capitalism.” In Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, edited by Castles, Frances, Liebried, Stephen, Lewis, Jane, Obinger, Herbert, and Pierson, Christopher, 183–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–93.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David 2009. “Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 61 (3): 438–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. “Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (5): 600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy.” World Politics 50 (4): 507–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Carsten. 2008. “Worlds of Welfare Services and Transfers.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (2): 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter 2000. “Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 7(2): 127–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. 2003. “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95.” American Political Science Review 97 (3): 425–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jonah. 1999. “Vice into Virtue? Progressive Politics and Welfare Reform in Continental Europe.” Politics and Society 27 (2): 239–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, Jane, ed. 1997. Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 316–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Julia. 2006. Age in the Welfare State: The Origins Of Social Spending On Pensioners, Workers, And Children. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manow, Philip. 2004. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Esping-Andersen's Regime Typology and the Religious Roots of the Western Welfare State. MPifG Working Paper. No. 4/3. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas H. 1964. Class, Citizenship and Social Development. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Swank, Duane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1982. “Some Contradictions of the Modern Welfare State.” Critical Social Policy 2 (5): 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013a. Income Distribution and Poverty Database. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013b. Social Expenditures Database. Paris: OECD.
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58 (3): 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda. 1984. “Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain, 1900–1911, and the United States, 1880s–1920.” American Sociological Review 49 (6): 726–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palier, Bruno, ed. 2010. A Long Goodbye to Bismarck?: The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48 (2): 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polyani, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America. Ithaca, NY: Century Foundation, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill. 1987. “Theories of the Welfare State.” Annual Review of Sociology 13:109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philipp, Hacker, Jacob S., and Schlesinger, Mark. 2012. “Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle A., and Allan, James P.. 2008. “Social Stratification and Welfare Regimes for the Twenty-First Century: Revisiting the Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.” World Politics 60 (4): 642–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle, Jahn, Detlef, and Kuitto, Kati. 2013. Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset 2. Version xx. University of Connecticut and University of Greifswald. http://cwed2.org/Data/Codebook.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stephens, John D. 1979. Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13 (3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan 2010. “Public Attitudes.” In Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, edited by Castles, Frances, Liebfried, Stephen, Lewis, Jane, Obinger, Herbert, and Pierson, Christopher, 241–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter A. 2002. Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, Richard Morris. 1974. Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
van Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2011. ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 Countries between 1960 and 2007. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 1974. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×