Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
    • You have access
    • Open access
  • Cited by 14
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2023
Print publication year:
2023
Online ISBN:
9781009209717
Creative Commons:
Creative Common License - CC Creative Common License - BY Creative Common License - NC Creative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/creativelicenses

Book description

Most accounts of bodily self-awareness focus on its sensory and agentive dimensions, tracking the origins of our special relationship with our own body in the way we gain information about it and in the way we act with it. However, they often neglect a fundamental dimension of our subjective bodily life, namely, its affective dimension. This Element will discuss bodily self-awareness through the filter of its affective significance. It is organized around four core themes: (i) the relationship between bodily awareness and action in instrumental and protective contexts, (ii) the motivational role of pain and interoception, (iii) the sense of bodily ownership and its relation to the value of the body for survival, and (iv) bodily anchoring in peripersonal and egocentric awareness. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

References

Adams, K. L., Edwards, A., Peart, C., et al. (2022). The association between anxiety and cardiac interoceptive accuracy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 140, 104754.
Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the ‘aboutness’ of mental states. Journal of Philosophy, 93(7), 337–72.
Allen, C. (2004). Animal pain. Noûs, 38(4), 617–43.
Alsmith, A. J. T. (2015). Mental activity and the sense of ownership. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(4), 881–96.
Alsmith, A. J. T. (2017). Perspectival structure and agentive self-location.In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 263–88.
Alsmith, A. J. T. (2021). The structure of egocentric space. In de Vignemont, F., Serino, A., Wong, H. Y., and Farnè, A. (eds.), The World at Our Fingertips: A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Peripersonal Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–50.
Anema, H. A., van Zandvoort, M. J., de Haan, E. H., et al. (2009). A double dissociation between somatosensory processing for perception and action. Neuropsychologia, 47(6), 1615–20.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1962). On sensations of position. Analysis, 22(3), 55–8.
Armstrong, D. (1962). Bodily Sensations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ataria, Y., Tanaka, S., and Gallagher, S. (eds.). (2021). Body Schema and Body Image: New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aydede, M. (ed.). (2005). Pain: New Essays on Its Nature and the Methodology of Its Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baier, B., and Karnath, H. O. (2008). Tight link between our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Stroke, 39(2), 486–8.
Bain, D. (2011). The imperative view of pain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(910), 164–85.
Bain, D. (2013). What makes pains unpleasant?,Philosophical Studies, 166(S1), 6989.
Bain, D. (2014). Pains that don’t hurt. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92(2), 116.
Bain, D. (2019). Why take painkillers?, Nous, 53(2), 462–90.
Barbot, A., and Carrasco, M. (2018). Emotion and anxiety potentiate the way attention alters visual appearance. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 110.
Barlassina, L., and Hayward, M. K. (2019a). More of me! Less of me! Reflexive imperativism about affective phenomenal character. Mind, 128(512), 1013–44.
Barlassina, L., and Hayward, M. K. (2019b). Loopy regulations. Philosophical Topics, 47(2), 233–61.
Bassolino, M., Finisguerra, A., Canzoneri, E., Serino, A., and Pozzo, T. (2015). Dissociating effect of upper limb non-use and overuse on space and body representations. Neuropsychologia, 70, 385–92.
Benedetti, F., Pollo, A., Lopiano, L., et al. (2003). Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor, and hormonal placebo/nocebo responses. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10), 4315–23.
Bergqvist, A., and Cowan, R. (eds.). (2018).Evaluative Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bermúdez, J. L. (1998). The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bermúdez, J. L. (2011). Bodily awareness and self-consciousness. In Gallagher, S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–79.
Bermúdez, J. L. (2015). Bodily ownership, bodily awareness, and knowledge without observation. Analysis, 75(1), 3745.
Bermúdez, J. L. (2017). Ownership and the space of the body. In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. J. T. (eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 117–44.
Billon, A. (2017). Mineness first: Three challenges to the recent theories of the sense of bodily ownership. In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. J. T. (eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 189216.
Billon, A. (2022). Depersonalization and the sense of bodily ownership. In Alsmith, A. J. T. and Longo, M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Bodily Awareness. London: Routledge, pp. 366–79.
Billon, A. (2023). What is it like to lack mineness? In García-Carpintero, M. and Guillot, M. (eds.), Self-Experience: Essays on Inner Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–42.
Blini, E., Farnè, A., Brozzoli, C., and Hadj-Bouziane, F. (2021). Close is better: Visual perception in peripersonal space. In de Vignemont, F., Serino., A., Wong, H. Y., and Farnè, A. (eds.), The World at Our Fingertips: A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Peripersonal Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4760.
Blanke, O., & Arzy, S. (2005). The out-of-body experience: disturbed self-processing at the temporo-parietal junction. The Neuroscientist, 11(1), 1624.
Block, N. (1996). Mental paint and mental latex. Philosophical Issues, 7, 1949.
Botvinick, M., and Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
Bouillaud, J.-B. (1825). Traité clinique et physiologique de l’encéphalite, ou inflammation du cerveau, et de ses suites. Paris: Chez J.-B. Bailliere.
Bradley, A. (2021). The feeling of bodily ownership. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 102(2), 359–79.
Brener, J., and Ring, C. (2016). Towards a psychophysics of interoceptive processes: The measurement of heartbeat detection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1708), 20160015.
Brewer, B. (1992). Self-location and agency. Mind, 101(401), 1734.
Brewer, B. (1995). Bodily awareness and the self. In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, T., and Eilan, N. (eds.), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Briscoe, R. E. (2008). Vision, action, and make‐perceive. Mind and Language, 23(4), 457–97.
Briscoe, R. E. (2009). Egocentric spatial representation in action and perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(2), 423–60.
Briscoe, R. (2014). Spatial content and motoric significance. AVANT, 5(2), 199217.
Brozzoli, C., Gentile, G., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). That’s near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(42), 14573–82.
Bufacchi, R. J., and Iannetti, G. D. (2018). An action field theory of peripersonal space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(12), 1076–90.
Campbell, J. (2002). Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cappelen, H., and Dever, J. (2013).The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cardinali, L., Frassinetti, F., Brozzoli, C., et al. (2009). Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology, 19(12), R478R479.
Cardinali, L., Zanini, A., Yanofsky, R., et al. (2021). The toolish hand illusion: Embodiment of a tool based on similarity with the hand. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 19.
Carruthers, P. (2018). Valence and value. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(3), 658–80.
Cassam, Q. (1997). Self and World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Casser, L., and Clarke, S. (2022). Is pain modular? Mind and Language, 38(3), 826–46.
Ceunen, E., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., and Van Diest, I. (2016). On the origin of interoception,Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
Chadha, M. (2018). No-self and the phenomenology of ownership.Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(1), 1427.
Chamberlain, C. (2022). Not a sailor in his ship: Descartes on bodily awareness. In Alsmith, A. J. T. and Longo, M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Bodily Awareness. London: Routledge, pp. 8394.
Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cléry, J., and Ben Hamed, S (2021). Functional networks for peripersonal space coding and prediction of impact to the body. In de Vignemont, F., Serino, A.., Wong, H. Y., and Farnè, A. (eds.), The World at Our Fingertips: A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Peripersonal Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 6180.
Cogliano, R., Crisci, C., Conson, M., Grossi, D., and Trojano, L. (2012). Chronic somatoparaphrenia: A follow-up study on two clinical cases. Cortex, 48(6), 758–67.
Corns, J. (2020). The Complex Reality of Pain. London: Routledge.
Craig, A. D. (2010). The sentient self. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5–6), 563–77.
Cutter, B., and Tye, M. (2011). Tracking representationalism and the painfulness of pain. Philosophical Issues, 21, 90109.
Damasio, A. R. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens. London: William Heinemann.
Danziger, N., and Willer, J. C. (2009). L’insensibilité congénitale à la douleur. Revue Neurologique, 165(2), 129–36.
Delevoye-Turrell, Y., Bartolo, A., and Coello, Y. (2010). Motor representation and the perception of space. In Gangopadhyay, N. (ed.), Perception, Action and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 217–42.
Deonna, J., and Teroni, F. (2012). The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Descartes, R. (1641/1979). Les méditations métaphysiques. Paris: Garnier Flammarion.
Descartes, R. (1643/2018). Correspondance avec Élisabeth et autres lettres. Paris: Garnier Flammarion.
Dijkerman, H. C., and de Haan, E. H. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 189201.
Dokic, J. (2003). The sense of ownership: An analogy between sensation and action. In Roessler, J. and Eilan, N. (eds.), Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 321–44.
Dokic, J., and Martin, J. R. (2015). ‘Looks the same but feels different’: A metacognitive approach to cognitive penetrability. In Raftopoulos, A. and Zeimbekis, J. (eds), Cognitive Effects on Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 240–67.
Dokic, J., and Martin, J. R. (2017). Felt reality and the opacity of perception. Topoi, 36(2), 299309.
Dugas, L., and Moutier, F. (1910). Dépersonnalisation et émotion. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 70, 441–60.
Ehrsson, H. H., Fotopoulou, A., Radziun, D., Longo, M., and Tsakiris, M. (2022). No specific relationship between hypnotic suggestibility and the rubber hand illusion: A commentary with new and verification analyses. Nature Communication, 13, 564.
Ehrsson, H. H., Wiech, K., Weiskopf, N., Dolan, R. J., and Passingham, R. E. (2007). Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(23), 9828–33.
Eilan, N., McCarthy, R., and Brewer, B. (1993). General introduction. In Eilan, N., McCarthy, R., and Brewer, B. (eds.), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 122.
Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, G. (1985). Molyneux’s question. In The Collected Papers of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 364–99.
Ferentzi, E., Bogdany, T., Szabolcs, Z., et al. (2018). Multichannel investigation of interoception: Sensitivity is not a generalizable feature. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 223.
Fourneret, P., and Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36(11), 1133–40.
Frances, A., and Gale, L. (1975). The proprioceptive body image in self-object differentiation: A case of congenital indifference to pain and head-banging. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 44(1), 107–26.
Fulkerson, M. (2020). Emotional perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 98(1), 1630.
Fulkerson, M. (2023). How thirst compels: An aggregation model of sensory motivation. Mind and Language, 38(1), 141–55.
Gallagher, S. (2003). Bodily self-awareness and object perception. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 7(1), 5368.
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2022). Bodily self-awareness and body-schematic processes. In Alsmith, A. J. T. and Longo, M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Bodily Awareness. London: Routledge.
Gallagher, S., and Cole, J. (1995). Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 16(4), 369–90.
Garfinkel, S. N., Manassei, M. F., Hamilton-Fletcher, G., et al. (2016). Interoceptive dimensions across cardiac and respiratory axes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1708),
Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., and Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 6574.
Gligorov, N. (2017). Don’t worry, this will only hurt a bit: The role of expectation and attention in pain intensity. The Monist, 100(4), 501–13.
González-Franco, M., Peck, T. C., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., and Slater, M. (2013). A threat to a virtual hand elicits motor cortex activation. Experimental Brain Research, 232(3), 875–87.
Grahek, N. (2001). Feeling Pain and Being in Pain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Graziano, M. (2018). The Spaces between Us: A Story of Neuroscience, Evolution, and Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1962). Some remarks about the senses. In Butler, R. J. (ed.), Analytical Philosophy: First Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–53.
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377–96.
Gurwitsch, A. (1985). Marginal Consciousness. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Hediger, H. (1955). Studies of the Psychology and Behavior of Captive Animals in Zoos and Circuses. London: Butterworth and Co.
Hall, E. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Albany, NY: Anchor Books.
Hall, R. J. (2008). If it itches, scratch!Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(4), 525–35.
Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Husserl, E. (1952/1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book, trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jacobson, H. (2013). Killing the messenger: Representationalism and the painfulness of pain. The Philosophical Quarterly, 63(252), 509–19.
Jacobson, H. (2021). The role of valence in perception: An ARTistic treatment. Philosophical Review, 130(4), 481531.
Janet, P. (1908). Le sentiment de dépersonnalisation. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique, 5, 514–16.
Kammers, M. P. M., de Vignemont, F., Verhagen, L., and Dijkerman, H. C. (2009). The rubber hand illusion in action.Neuropsychologia, 47(1), 204–11.
Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In Almog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 481563.
Klein, C. (2015a). What the Body Commands: The Imperative Theory of Pain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klein, C. (2015b). What pain asymbolia really shows. Mind, 124(494), 493516.
Klein, C., and Martínez, M. (2018). Imperativism and pain intensity. In Corns, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. London: Routledge, pp. 1326.
Lang, P. J., and Bradley, M. M. (2013). Appetitive and defensive motivation: Goal-directed or goal-determined?. Emotion Review, 5(3), 230–4.
Leder, D. (2018). Inside insights: A phenomenology of interoception. In Tsakiris, M. and de Preester, H. (eds.), The Interoceptive Mind: From Homeostasis to Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 307–22.
LeDoux, J., and Daw, N. D. (2018). Surviving threats: Neural circuit and computational implications of a new taxonomy of defensive behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(5), 269–82.
Lenggenhager, B. and Ho, J. T. (2022). Out-of-body experiences. In Alsmith, A. J. T. and Longo, M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Bodily Awareness. London: Routledge, pp. 411–23.
Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., and Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 109.6–109.9.
Lewis, D. (1980). Mad pain and Martian pain. Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, 1, 216–22.
Lloyd, D. M. (2007). Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition, 64(1), 104–9.
Longo, M. R., Schüür, F., Kammers, M. P., Tsakiris, M., and Haggard, P. (2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 107(3), 978–98.
Lush, P. (2020). Demand characteristics confound the rubber hand illusion. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 22.
Lush, P., Botan, V., Scott, R. B., et al. (2020). Trait phenomenological control predicts experience of mirror synaesthesia and the rubber hand illusion. Nature Communications, 11(1), 110.
McDowell, J. (2011). Anscombe on bodily self-knowledge. In Ford, A., Hornsby, J., and Stoutland, F. (eds.), Essays on Anscombe’s ‘Intention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 128–46.
Ma, K., and Hommel, B. (2015). The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 277–88.
Malebranche, N. (1674/1980). The Search after Truth, trans. T. M. Lennon. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Mandrigin, A. (2021). The where of bodily awareness. Synthese, 198(3), 1887–903.
Maratos, F. A., and Pessoa, L. (2019). What drives prioritized visual processing? A motivational relevance account. Progress in Brain Research, 247, 111–48.
Maravita, A. (2008). Spatial disorders. In Cappa, S. F., Abutalebi, J., Demonet, J. F., Fletcher, P. C., and Garrard, P. (eds.), Cognitive Neurology: A Clinical Textbook. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 89118.
Martin, M. G. F. (1992). Sight and touch. In Crane, T. (ed.), The Content of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 199201.
Martin, M. G. F. (1995). Bodily awareness: A sense of ownership. In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, T., and Eilan, N. (eds.), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Martínez, M. (2011). Imperative content and the painfulness of pain. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 6790.
Martínez, M. (2015). Disgusting smells and imperativism, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(5–6), 191200.
Martínez, M. (2022). Imperative transparency. Mind, 131(522), 585601.
Medina, J. (2022). Distinguishing body representations. In Alsmith, A. J. T. and Longo, M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Bodily Awareness. London: Routledge, pp. 150–60.
Melzack, R. (1990). Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix. Trends in Neuroscience, 13(3), 8892.
Melzack, R., and Wall, P. D. (1983). The Challenge of Pain. New York: Basic Books
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Metzinger, T. (2005). Out-of-body experiences as the origin of the concept of a ‘soul’. Mind and Matter, 3(1), 5784.
Miall, R. C., Afanasyeva, D., Cole, J. D., and Mason, P. (2021). The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: A comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss. Experimental Brain Research, 239(7), 2043–61.
Miller, L. E., Montroni, L., Koun, E., et al. (2018). Sensing with tools extends somatosensory processing beyond the body. Nature, 561(7722), 239–42.
Millikan, R. G. (1990). The myth of the essential indexical. Noûs, 24(5), 723–34.
Millikan, R. G. (1995). Pushmi-pullyu representations. Philosophical Perspectives, 9, 185200.
Milner, A. D., and Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46(3), 774–85.
Mitchell, J. (2021). Emotion As Feeling towards Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, S. W. (1871). Phantom limbs. Lippincott’s Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, 8, 563–9.
Moore, G. E. (1903). The refutation of idealism.Mind, 12(48), 433–53.
Moro, V., Zampini, M., and Aglioti, S. M. (2004). Changes in spatial position of hands modify tactile extinction but not disownership of contralesional hand in two right brain-damaged patients. Neurocase, 10(6), 437–43.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Noë, A. (2010). Vision without Representation. In Gangopadhyay, N., Madary, M., and Spicer, F. (eds.), Perception, Action and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–56.
O’Callaghan, C. (2019). A Multisensory Philosophy of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Regan, K. (2011). Why Red Doesn’t Sound Like a Bell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Shaughnessy, B. (1980). The Will, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Shaughnessy, B. (1995). Proprioception and the body image. In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, T., and Eilan, N. (eds.), The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 175203.
Olausson, H., Cole, J., Rylander, K., et al. (2008). Functional role of unmyelinated tactile afferents in human hairy skin: Sympathetic response and perceptual localization. Experimental Brain Research, 184(1), 135–40.
Olson, E. (1997). The Human Animal: Personal Identity without Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paillard, J. (1999). Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients. In Gantchev, G. N., Mori, S., and Massion, J. (eds.), Motor Control, Today and Tomorrow. Sofia: Academic Publishing House, pp. 197214.
Paillard, J., Michel, F., and Stelmach, G. (1983). Localization without content: A tactile analogue of ‘blind sight’. Archives of Neurology, 40(9), 548–51.
Pastore, R. E. (1987). Categorical perception: Some psychophysical models. In Harnad, S. (ed.), Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2952.
Peacocke, C. (2000). Being Known. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peacocke, C. (2014). The Mirror of the World: Subjects, Consciousness, and Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peacocke, C. (2016). The nature and role of first- and second-person content. Analysis, 76(3), 345–54.
Peacocke, C. (2017). Philosophical reflections on the first person. In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 289310.
Perry, J. (1993). The Problem of the Essential Indexical: And other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitron, V., Alsmith, A., and de Vignemont, F. (2018). How do the body schema and the body image interact? Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 352–8.
Pouget, A., Deneve, S., and Duhamel, J.-R. (2002). A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 741–7.
Pourtois, G., Schettino, A., and Vuilleumier, P. (2013). Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: What is magic and what is not. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 492512.
Price, D. D. (2000). Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science, 288(5472), 1769–72.
Richardson, L. (2017). Sight and the body. In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 239–62.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (1997). The space around us. Science, 277(5323), 190–1.
Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., and Gentilucci, M. (1981). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II: Visual responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 2(2), 147–63.
Röder, B., Kusmierek, A., Spence, C., and Schicke, T. (2007). Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(11), 4753–8.
Romano, D., Gandola, M., Bottini, G., and Maravita, A. (2014). Arousal responses to noxious stimuli in somatoparaphrenia and anosognosia: Clues to body awareness. Brain, 137(Pt 4): 1213–23.
Romano, D., and Maravita, A. (2019). The dynamic nature of the sense of ownership after brain injury: Clues from asomatognosia and somatoparaphrenia, Neuropsychologia, 132, 107–19.
Rossetti, Y., Rode, G., and Boisson, D. (1995). Implicit processing of somaesthetic information: A dissociation between where and how? Neuroreport, 6(3), 506–10.
Schellenberg, S. (2007). Action and self-location in perception. Mind, 116(463), 603–32.
Schwenkler, J. (2014). Vision, self-location, and the phenomenology of the ‘point of view’. Noûs, 48(1), 137–55.
Serino, A. (2019). Peripersonal space (PPS) as a multisensory interface between the individual and the environment, defining the space of the self. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 99, 138–59.
Serrahima, C. (2023). The bounded body: On the sense of bodily ownership and the experience of space. In Garcia-Carpintero, M. and Guillot, M. (eds.), Self-Experience: Essays on Inner Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 250–68.
Seth, A. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17(11), 565–73.
Shoemaker, S. (1968). Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy, 65(19), 555–67.
Shoemaker, S. (1976). Embodiment and behavior. In Rorty, A. O. (ed.), The Identity of Persons. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 109–37.
Shoemaker, S. (1999). Self, body, and coincidence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (supplementary Volume), 73, 287306.
Schwoebel, J. and Coslett, H. B. (2005). Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(4), 543–53.
Shepherd, J. (2015). Conscious control over action. Mind and Language, 30(3), 320–44.
Sherrington, C. S. (1906). The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Shevlin, H., and Friesen, P. (2021). Pain, placebo, and cognitive penetration. Mind and Language, 36(5), 771–91.
Siegel, S. (2010). The Contents of Visual Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sierra, M. (2009). Depersonalization: A New Look at a Neglected Syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, A. (2008). Guarding the body: A Cartesian phenomenology of perception. In Hoffman, P., Owen, D., and Yaffe, G. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 81113.
Skarbez, R., Neyret, S., Brooks, F. P., Slater, M., and Whitton, M. C. (2017). A psychophysical experiment regarding components of the plausibility illusion. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(4), 1369–78.
Slater, M., Spanlang, B., and Corominas, D. (2010). Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 29(4), 19.
Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Blanke, O. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PloS One, 5(5), e10564.
Smith, A. D. (2002). The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Snowdon, P. F. (1991). Personal identity and brain transplants. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 29, 109–26.
Spence, C., Pavani, F., and Driver, J. (2004). Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(2), 148–69.
Suksasilp, C., and Garfinkel, S. N. (2022). Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework. Biological Psychology, 168, 108262.
Tammero, L. F., and Dickinson, M. H. (2002). Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly Drosophila Melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(18), 2785–98.
Tappolet, C. (2016). Emotions, Values and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, C. (1964). The Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge.
Tsakiris, M. (2017). The material me. In de Vignemont, F. and Alsmith, A. (eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 335–62.
Tsakiris, M. and de Preester, H. (eds.) (2018). The Interoceptive Mind: From Homeostasis to Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Vignemont, F. (2007). Habeas corpus: The sense of ownership of one’s own body. Mind and Language, 22(4), 427–49.
de Vignemont, F. (2010). Body schema and body image: Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 669–80.
de Vignemont, F. (2011). A mosquito bite against the enactive view to bodily experiences. Journal of Philosophy, 108(4), 188204.
de Vignemont, F. (2015). Pain and bodily care: Whose body matters? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(3), 542–60.
de Vignemont, F. (2018). Mind the Body. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Vignemont, F. (2020). What phenomenal contrast for bodily ownership? Journal of the American Philosophy Association, 6(1), 117–37.
de Vignemont, F. (2021). A minimal sense of here-ness. Journal of Philosophy, 118(4), 169–87.
de Vignemont, F. (2023). Fifty shades of affective colouring of perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 101(1): 115.
de Vignemont, F., Majid, A., Jola, C., and Haggard, P. (2009). Segmenting the body into parts: Evidence from biases in tactile perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(3), 500–12.
de Vignemont, F., Serino, A., Wong, H. Y., and Farnè, A. (eds.) (2021). The World at Our Fingertips: A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Peripersonal Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wager, T. D., Rilling, J. K., Smith, E. E., et al. (2004). Placebo-induced changes in FMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1162–7.
Welch, R. B., Widawski, M. H., Harrington, J., and Warren, D. H. (1979). An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics, 25(2), 126–32.
Wong, H. Y. (2009). On the necessity of bodily awareness for bodily action. Psyche, 15(1).
Wong, H. Y. (2015). On the significance of bodily awareness for action. Philosophical Quarterly, 65(261): 790812.
Wong, H. Y. (2017). On proprioception in action: Multimodality versus deafferentation. Mind and Language, 32(3), 259–82.
Wong, H. Y. (2018). Embodied agency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(3), 584612.
Wu, W. (2023). Mineness and introspective data. In Garcia-Carpintero, M. and Guillot, M. (eds.), Self-Experience: Essays on Inner Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 120–41.
Zanini, A., Patané, I., Blini, E., et al. (2021). Peripersonal and reaching space differ: Evidence from their spatial extent and multisensory facilitation pattern. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28(6), 1894–905.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.