Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:25:22.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Anthropological validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2010

Simha Arom
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access

Summary

The method of polyphonic analysis described above is experimental. The question must now be raised whether the use of this kind of experimentation in ethnomusicology is acceptable. Before proceeding, we may remark that the procedure receives initial support from the fact that a number of experiments involving the same object have yielded, perhaps not identical, but at least extremely similar and equally revealing results. Paradoxically, the theoretical assumptions of the method are confirmed in its application. We may summarise these assumptions as follows: each part in polyphonic music is itself a coherent entity; these parts also fit together in a coherent way; and the way they fit together two by two remains unchanged, however many times we record them. We furthermore assume that the combination of all the parts is equivalent to the set of the individual parts and to the set of all possible combinations of these parts. In applying the method, we can confirm each and every one of these hypotheses.

The procedure consists essentially of obtaining a diachronic reproduction of a synchronic event. The fundamental principle of the successive entry of voices or instruments, which characterises the polyphony and polyrhythmics of this part of Africa, is nevertheless respected, even while the music is being ‘disassembled’. In some cases, entries take place in indeterminate order; in others, they are strictly ordered in connection with the structure of the piece, and can be indicated by the musicians. The musicologist has no part in this breakdown, and is a mere spectator to the musical performance. The method follows this order step by step. The procedure has the further advantage of being applicable in the field, i.e., in the musicians' own cultural setting.

Type
Chapter
Information
African Polyphony and Polyrhythm
Musical Structure and Methodology
, pp. 117 - 134
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×