Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-x9fsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T15:11:26.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Table of Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2024

Nathalie A. Smuha
Nathalie A. Smuha
Affiliation:
KU Leuven Faculty of Law

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Algorithmic Rule By Law
How Algorithmic Regulation in the Public Sector Erodes the Rule of Law
 , pp. xix - xxii
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Table of Cases

European Court of Human Rights

  • Advance Pharma sp. z o.o v Poland, Application no. 1469/20, 3 February 2022

  • Amuur v France, Application no. 19776/92, 25 June 1996

  • Breyer v Germany, Application no. 50001/12, 30 January 2020

  • Broniowski v Poland, Application no. 31443/96, 22 June 2004

  • Buhuceanu and others v Romania, Applications nos. 20081/19 and 20 others, 23 May 2023

  • Burden v the United Kingdom GC, Application no. 13378/05, 29 April 2008

  • Catt v The United Kingdom, Application no. 43514/15, 24 January 2019

  • Engel and Others v The Netherlands, Application nos. 5100/71; 5101/71; 5102/71; 5354/72; 5370/72, 8 June 1976

  • Evans v the United Kingdom, Application no. 6339/05, 10 April 2007

  • Georgia v Russia (I), Application no. 13255/07, 3 July 2014

  • Golder v the United Kingdom, Application no. 4451/70, 21 February 1975

  • Hämäläinen v Finland, Application no. 37359/09, 26 July 2014

  • Hassan v the United Kingdom, Application no. 29750/09, 16 September 2014

  • Hatton v the United Kingdom, Application no. 36022/97, 8 July 2003

  • Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v Poland, Application no. 7511/13, 24 July 2014

  • Ivinović v Croatia, Application no. 13006/13, 18 September 2014

  • Klass and Others v Germany, Application no. 5029/71, 6 September 1978

  • M.M. v the United Kingdom, Application no. 24029/07, 13 November 2012

  • Malone v United Kingdom, Application no. 8691/79, 2 August 1984

  • Sunday Times v United Kingdom (no. 1), Application no. 6538/74, 26 April 1979

Court of Justice of the European Union

  • Case 26-62, Van Gend & Loos, 5 February 1963, EU:C:1963:1

  • Case 6-64, Flaminio Costa v ENEL, 15 July 1964, EU:C:1964:66

  • Case 294/83, Parti écologiste ‘Les Verts’ v European Parliament, 23 April 1986, EU:C:1986:166

  • Case 46/87 and 227/88, Hoechst v Commission, 21 September 1989, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337

  • Opinion 2/94 of the Court, Accession to the ECHR, 18 March 1996, ECLI:EU:C:1996:140

  • Case C-376/98, Germany v European Parliament and Council, 5 October 2000, ECLI:EU:C:2000:544

  • Case C-60/00, Carpenter, 11 July 2002, ECLI:EU:C:2002:434

  • Case C-50/00 P, Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union, 25 July 2002, ECLI:EU:C:2002:462

  • Case C-101/01, Bodil Lindqvist, 6 November 2003, ECLI:EU:C:2003:596

  • Case C-496/99 P, Commission v CAS Succhi di Frutta, 29 April 2004, ECLI:EU:C:2004:236

  • Case C-36/02, Omega, 14 October 2004, ECLI:EU:C:2004:614

  • Case C-389/05, Commission v France, 17 July 2008, ECLI:EU:C:2008:411

  • Case C-169/07, Hartlauer v Wiener Landesregierung, 10 March 2009, ECLI:EU:C:2009:141

  • Joined Cases C-261/07 and C-299/07, VTB-VAB NV, 23 April 2009, ECLI:EU:C:2009:244

  • Case C-203/08, Sporting Exchange Ltd v Minister van Justitie, 3 June 2010, ECLI:EU:C:2010:307

  • Case C-208/09, Wittgenstein, 22 December 2010, ECLI:EU:C:2010:806

  • Case C-617/10, Ackerberg v Hans Åkerberg Franson, 26 February 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105

  • Joined Cases C‑584/10 P, C‑593/10 P and C‑595/10 P, Commission and Others v Kadi, 18 July 2013, EU:C:2013:518

  • Case C‑583/11 P, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council, 3 October 2013, EU:C:2013:625

  • Case C‑274/12 P, Telefónica v Commission, 19 December 2013, EU:C:2013:852

  • Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others, 8 April 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:238

  • Case T‑402/13, Orange v European Commission, 25 November 2014, ECLI:EU:T:2014:99

  • Opinion 2/13 of the Court, Accession to the ECHR, 18 December 2014, EU:C:2014:2454

  • Case C-362/14, Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, 6 October 2015, EU:C:2015:650

  • Case C‑216/18 PPU, LM, 25 July 2018, EU:C:2018:586

  • Joined Cases C‑293/17 and C‑294/17, Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment, 7 November 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:882

  • Case C‑619/18, Commission v Poland, 15 November 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:910

  • Case C-573/17, Popławski, 24 June 2019, ECLI:EU:C:2019:530

  • Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems, 16 July 2020, ECLI:EU:C:2020:559

  • Joined Cases C‑354/20 PPU and C‑412/20 PPU, 17 December 2020, EU:C:2020:1033

  • Case C-470/19, Friends of the Irish Environment Limited v Commissioner for Environmental Information, 15 April 2021, ECLI:EU:C:2021:271

  • Case C‑901/19, CF, DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 10 June 2021, ECLI:EU:C:2021:472

  • Case C‑791/19 R, Commission v Poland, 15 July 2021, ECLI:EU:C:2021:596

  • Case C‑204/21 R, Commission v Poland, 27 October 2021, ECLI:EU:C:2021:878

  • Case C‑156/21, Opinion AG Campos Sánchez-Bordona, Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2 December 2021, ECLI:EU:C:2021:974

  • Case C-156/21, Hungary v Parliament and Council (Full Court), 16 February 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:97

  • Case C-157/21, Poland v Parliament and Council, 16 February 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:98

  • Joined Cases C‑562/21 PPU and C‑563/21 PPU, 22 February 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:100

  • Order of the President of the Court in Case C-657/21, European Parliament v European Commission, 8 June 2022

  • Case C-817/19, Ligue des droits humains v Conseil des ministres (PNR Case), 21 June 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:491

  • Case C-480/21, W O and J L v Minister for Justice and Equality, Order of the Court of 12 July 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:592

  • Case C‑204/2, Commission v Poland, 5 June 2023, ECLI:EU:C:2023:442

  • Case C‑107/23 PPU, Lin, 24 July 2023, ECLI:EU:C:2023:606

  • Case C‑634/21, OQ v SCHUFA Holding AG, 7 December 2023, ECLI:EU:C:2023:957

National Courts

Netherlands

  • De Stichting Werkgroep Behoud de Peel v het college van gedeputeerde staten van Noord-Brabant, Raad Van State, 201600614/1/R2; 201600617/1/R2; 201600618/1/R2; 201600620/1/R2; 201600622/1/R2 en 201600630/1/R2, 17 May 2017, ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:1259

  • Stichting A4 met Vaart et al. v de minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat, Raad Van State, 201602958/1/R6, 18 July 2018, ECLI:NL:RVS:2018:2454

  • Hoge Raad, nr. 17/01448, 17 August 2018; ECLI:HR:2018

  • NJCM et al. en FNV v Staat der Nederlanden (SyRI Judgment), 2020, Rechtbank Den Haag C-09-550982-HA ZA 18-388, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:865

US

  • K.W. v Armstrong, 298 FRD 479, D. Idaho 2014

  • Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. 2022

UK

  • R (Bridges) v CCSWP and SSHD, 4 September 2019, High Court, Case no.: CO/4085/2018, [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin)

  • R (Bridges) v CCSWP and SSHD, 11 August 2020, Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Case no.: C1/2019/2670, [2020] EWCA Civ 1058

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Table of Cases
  • Nathalie A. Smuha, KU Leuven Faculty of Law
  • Book: Algorithmic Rule By Law
  • Online publication: 14 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009427500.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Table of Cases
  • Nathalie A. Smuha, KU Leuven Faculty of Law
  • Book: Algorithmic Rule By Law
  • Online publication: 14 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009427500.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Table of Cases
  • Nathalie A. Smuha, KU Leuven Faculty of Law
  • Book: Algorithmic Rule By Law
  • Online publication: 14 December 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009427500.003
Available formats
×