Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Get access
    Buy the print book
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian
  • Cited by 15
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    O’Sullivan, K. Robson, J. and Winters, N. 2018. ‘I feel like I have a disadvantage’: how socio-economically disadvantaged students make the decision to study at a prestigious university. Studies in Higher Education, p. 1.
    Jiménez, Andrea and Zheng, Yingqin 2018. Tech hubs, innovation and development. Information Technology for Development, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 95.
    Naila, Nurun Nahar, Baitun Lazarus, Monica Ritter, Gaelen Hossain, Muttaquina Mahfuz, Mustafa Ahmed, Tahmeed Denno, Donna Walson, Judd and Ickes, Scott 2018. “Those who care much, understand much.” Maternal perceptions of children's appetite: Perspectives from urban and rural caregivers of diverse parenting experience in Bangladesh. Maternal & Child Nutrition, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. e12473.
    Boyadjieva, Pepka and Ilieva-Trichkova, Petya 2018. The Palgrave International Handbook on Adult and Lifelong Education and Learning. p. 267.
    Boni, Alejandra Millán Franco, Gynna F. and Millán Franco, María Alejandra 2018. When Collectivity Makes a Difference: Theoretical and Empirical Insights from Urban and Rural Communities in Colombia. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 216.
    Robeyns, Ingrid 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined.
    Hannon, Cliona Faas, Daniel and O'Sullivan, Katriona 2017. Widening the educational capabilities of socio-economically disadvantaged students through a model of social and cultural capital development. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 43, Issue. 6, p. 1225.
    Burger, Ronelle McAravey, Camren and van der Berg, Servaas 2017. The Capability Threshold: Re-examining the Definition of the Middle Class in an Unequal Developing Country. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 89.
    Lazar, Amanda Edasis, Caroline and Piper, Anne Marie 2017. Supporting People with Dementia in Digital Social Sharing. p. 2149.
    Davis, John B. and Wells, Thomas R. 2016. Transformation Without Paternalism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 360.
    D'Emilione, Matteo Fabrizi, Luca Giuliano, Giovanna Raciti, Paolo Tenaglia, Simona and Vera Vivaldi, Paloma 2016. Multidimensional Approach to an Analysis of Individual Deprivation: The MACaD Model and the Results of Empirical Investigation. Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 45, Issue. 2-3, p. 256.
    Wilson-Strydom, Merridy and Walker, Melanie 2015. A capabilities-friendly conceptualisation of flourishing in and through education. Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 310.
    Crocker, David A. 2014. Development and global ethics: five foci for the future. Journal of Global Ethics, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 245.
    Ilieva-Trichkova, Petya and Boyadjieva, Pepka 2014. Dynamics of inequalities in access to higher education: Bulgaria in a comparative perspective. European Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 97.
    Kosko, Stacy J. 2013. Agency vulnerability, participation, and the self-determination of indigenous peoples. Journal of Global Ethics, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 293.
    ×
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: June 2012

3 - Capability and Agency

Export citation
Summary

INTRODUCTION

The capability approach is one of Amartya Sen's most significant contributions to philosophy and the social sciences. His writings on the capability approach are not only of theoretical interest on their own, but also provide concepts used in his work on social choice, freedoms, and development (see the chapters by Alkire, Pettit, and Roberts in this volume). Moreover, the capability approach has practical relevance for policy design and assessment, most famously through the work of the United Nations' Human Development Reports (United Nations Development Programme 1990–2007/8).

This chapter provides an overview of the conceptual and normative foundations of the capability approach and the role of agency within the approach. It puts aside the diverse ways in which the capability approach has been applied and implemented (Robeyns 2006). The chapter is divided into two parts. The first part, of which Ingrid Robeyns is the primary author, describes the main purpose of the capability approach, the concepts of functioning and capability, and the question of selecting and weighing capabilities. The second part, of which David A. Crocker is the primary author, focuses on the nature, value, and role of agency in the capability approach.

CAPABILITY

The Capability Approach

Scholars and policy makers use the capability approach in a wide range of fields, most prominently in development studies and policymaking, welfare economics, social policy, and social and political philosophy. It can be employed in both narrower and broader ways.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Amartya Sen
  • Online ISBN: 9780511800511
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800511
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
References
Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction (New York: Oxford University Press).
Alkire, S. (2009). “Concepts and Measures of Agency” in Basu, and Kanbur, (eds.), Arguments for a Better World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Alvarez, M. (2005). “Agents, Actions, and Reasons,” Philosophical Books, 46, 1, 45–58.
Anderson, E. (1999). “What is the Point of Equality?” Ethics, 109, 2, 287–337.
Basu, K. (1987). “Achievements, Capabilities, and the Concept of Well-being,” Social Choice and Welfare, 4, 69–76.
Basu, K., and López-Calva, L. (forthcoming). “Functionings and Capabilities,” in Arrow, Sen, and Suzumura, (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 3 (North Holland: Elsevier Science).
Berlin, I. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Bratman, M. (1999). Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Brighouse, H., and Robeyns, I. (eds.) (forthcoming). Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Buss, S., and Overtone, L. (eds.) (2002). Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Chakraborty, A. (1996). “On the Possibility of a Weighting System for Functionings,” Indian Economic Review, 31, 241–50.
Crocker, D. A. (2006). “Sen and Deliberative Democracy,” in Kaufman, (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (New York: Routledge).
Crocker, D. A. (2007). “Deliberative Participation in Local Development,” Journal of Human Development, 8, 3, 431–55.
Crocker, D. A. (2008). Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Drèze, J., and Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and Participation, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Dworkin, R. (1981). “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 283–345.
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Fleurbaey, M. (2002). “Development, Capabilities and Freedom,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 37, 71–7.
Frolich, N., and Oppenheimer, J. (1992). Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Gastil, J., and Levine, P. (eds.) (2005). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
Graham, C., and Pettinato, S. (2002). Happiness and Hardship (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).
Hirschman, A. (1977). The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Kaufman, A. (2006a). “Capabilities and Freedom,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 3, 289–300.
Kaufman, A. (2006b). “What Goods Do to (and for) People: Duality and Ambiguity in Sen's Capabilities Approach?” in Kaufman, (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (New York: Routledge).
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).
Nussbaum, M. (1988). “Nature, Functioning and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 6, suppl. vol., 145–84.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Nussbaum, M. (2003). “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice,” Feminist Economics, 9, 2/3, 33–59.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Pettit, P. (2001). “Capability and Freedom: A Defense of Sen,” Economics and Philosophy, 17, 1–20.
Pierik, R., and Robeyns, I. (2007). “Resources Versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory,” Political Studies, 55, 1, 133–52.
Pogge, T. (2002). “Can the Capability Approach be Justified?” Philosophical Topics, 30, 2, 167–228.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Reich, R. (2002). Bridging Liberalism and Multiculturalism in American Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Robeyns, I. (2003). “Sen's Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities,” Feminist Economics, 9, 2/3, 61–92.
Robeyns, I. (2005). “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey,” Journal of Human Development, 6, 1, 93–114.
Robeyns, I. (2006). “The Capability Approach in Practice,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 3, 351–76.
Roemer, J. (1996). Theories of Distributive Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Schokkaert, E. (2007). “Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life,” Journal of Human Development, 8, 3, 415–30.
Sen, A. K. (1980). “Equality of What?’ in McMurrin, (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sen, A. K. (1984). “Rights and Capabilities,” in Resources, Values and Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Sen, A. K. (1985a). Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
Sen, A. K. (1985b). “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984,” Journal of Philosophy, 82, 4, 169–221.
Sen, A. K. (1987). “The Standard of Living,” in Sen, Muellbauer , Kanbur, Hart , and Williams, , The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sen, A. K. (1990a). “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts,” in Tinker, (ed.), Persistent Inequalities (New York: Oxford University Press).
Sen, A. K. (1990b). “Individual Freedom as a Social Commitment,” New York Review of Books, 37, 10 (14 June).
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality Re-examined (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Sen, A. K. (1993). “Capability and Well-being,” in Nussbaum, and Sen, (eds.), The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Sen, A. K. (1995a). “Agency and Well-Being: The Development Agenda,” in Heyzer, Kapoor , and Sandler, (eds.), A Commitment to the World's Women (New York: UNIFEM).
Sen, A. K. (1995b). “Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice,” in Nussbaum, and Glover, (eds.), Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf).
Sen, A. K. (2002). Rationality and Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Sen, A. K. (2004). “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32, 4, 315–56.
Sen, A. K. (2005). “Human Rights and Capabilities,” Journal of Human Development, 6, 2, 151–66.
Sen, A. K. (2006). “The Importance of Ethics for the Efficient Design and Implementation of Development Policies and Projects,” International Social Capital, Ethics and Development Day, Inter-American Development Bank, 24 February.
Stewart, F. (1995). “Basic Needs, Capabilities and Human Development,” Greek Economic Review, 17, 2, 83–96.
Sugden, R. (1993). “Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen,” Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1947–62.
Taylor, J. S. (ed.) (2005). Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Tuomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
,United Nations Development Programme (1990–2007/8). Human Development Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Vallentyne, P. (2005). “Debate: Capabilities versus Opportunities for Wellbeing,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 13, 359–71.
Williams, A. (2002). “Dworkin on Capability,” Ethics, 113, 23–39.
Wolff, J., and de-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
,World Bank (2005). World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development (Washington, DC: World Bank / Oxford University Press).
Young, I. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Cancel
Confirm
×