Aiken, Henry David. “Definitions, Factual Premises, and Ethical Conclusions.” Philosophical Review 61 (1952): 331–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albee, Ernest. A History of English Utilitarianism. London: Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan, 1902

Alican, Necip Fikri. Mill's Principle of Utility: A Defence of John Stuart Mill's Notorious Proof. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994

Anderson, Susan Leigh. On Mill. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000

Anschutz, R. P. The Philosophy of J. S. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. W. D. Ross, trans. Vol. 9 of The Works of Aristotle. London: Oxford University Press, 1925

Ashmore, Robert B. Jr. “Deriving the Desirable from the Desired.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 44 (1970): 152–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, R. F. “J. S. Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Philosophy 32 (1957): 158–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baier, Annette. “Hume, David.” Encyclopedia of Ethics. 2nd ed. 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001

Bain, Alexander. John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections. 1882. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1969

Baker, John. “Mill's Captivating ‘Proof’ and the Foundations of Ethics.” Social Theory and Practice 6 (1980): 299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, John M. “Utilitarianism and Secondary Principles.” Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1971): 69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgardt, David. Bentham and the Ethics of Today with Manuscripts Hitherto Unpublished. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952. Reprint, New York: Octagon Books, 1966

Bayles, Michael D. “Mill's ‘Utilitarianism’ and Aristotle's ‘Rhetoric.’” Modern Schoolman 51 (1974): 159–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. Constitutional Code. Vol. 9 of Works of Jeremy Bentham. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1841

Bentham, Jeremy. Book of Fallacies. Vol. 2 of Works of Jeremy Bentham. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1843

Bentham, Jeremy. Works of Jeremy Bentham. 11 vols. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1838–43

Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. 1789. J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart, eds. London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1970

Berger, Fred R. “Mill's Concept of Happiness.” Interpretation 7 (1978): 95–117Google Scholar

Berger, Fred R. “John Stuart Mill on Justice and Fairness.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 115–36

Berger, Fred R. “Mill's Substantive Principles of Justice: A Comparison with Nozick.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1982): 373–80Google Scholar

Berger, Fred R.. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984

Billings, John R. “J. S. Mill's Quantity-Quality Distinction.” The Mill News Letter 7 (1971): 6–16Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H. Ethical Studies. 1876. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1927

Brandt, Richard B. Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1959

Brandt, Richard B.. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979

Brandt, Richard B.. Facts, Values, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996

Brink, David O. “Mill's Deliberative Utilitarianism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (1992): 67–103. Reprinted in Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays, David Lyons, ed. 149–83. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1997

Britton, Karl. John Stuart Mill. 2nd ed. New York: Dover, 1969

Bronaugh, Richard. “The Quality in Pleasures.” Philosophy 49 (1974): 320–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronaugh, Richard. “The Utility of Quality: An Understanding of Mill.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1974): 317–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. G. “What Is Mill's Principle of Utility?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973): 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. G.. “Mill's Act-Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1974): 67–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. G.. “Mill's Criterion of Wrong Conduct.” Dialogue 21 (1982): 27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmichael, Peter A. “Mill and ‘Desirable.’” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1974): 435–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carritt, E. F. Ethical and Political Thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1947

Chamblin, T. S., and Walker, A. D. M.. “Tendencies, Frequencies and Classical Utilitarianism.” Analysis 35 (1974): 8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, George A. “Mill's ‘Notorious Analogy.’” Journal of Philosophy 56 (1959): 652–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Elliot David. “J. S. Mill's Qualitative Hedonism: A Textual Analysis.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 18 (1980): 151–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Stephen. “Proof and Sanction in Mill's Utilitarianism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly (1990): 475–87Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. An Essay on Philosophical Method. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933

Coope, Christopher Miles. “Was Mill a Utilitarian?” Utilitas 10 (1998): 33–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Neil. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Mind 78 (1969): 278–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Wesley E., Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. supp. vol. 5. Guelph: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy, 1979

Copp, David. “The Iterated-Utilitarianism of J. S. Mill.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 75–98

Cowan, J. L. Pleasure and Pain. London: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's, 1968

Crisp, Roger. “Mill on Virtue as a Part of Happiness.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 367–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, Roger. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. London and New York: Routledge, 1997

Cupples, Brian. “A Defence of the Received Interpretation of J. S. Mill.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (1972): 131–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Norman O. “Is Mill's Hedonism Inconsistent?” American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph 7 (1973): 37–54Google Scholar

Dancy, Jonathan. “Mill's Puzzling Footnote.” Utilitas 12 (2000): 219–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uyl, Douglas, and Machan, Tibor R.. “Recent Work on the Concept of Happiness.” American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1983): 115–34Google Scholar

Dewey, John. Ethics. 1932. In vol. 7 of John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Jo Ann Boydston, ed. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985

Donner, Wendy. “John Stuart Mill's Concept of Utility.” Dialogue 22 (1983): 479–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donner, Wendy. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991

Donner, Wendy. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, John Skorupski, ed. 255–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998

Douglas, Charles. Introduction to The Ethics of John Stuart Mill, with introductory essays by Charles Douglas, ed. ⅰ–ⅽⅹⅹⅵ. Edinburgh and London: Blackwood, 1897

Douglas, Charles. John Stuart Mill: A Study of His Philosophy. 1895. Folcroft, PA: Folcroft Library Editions, 1973

Downie, R. S. “Mill on Pleasure and Self-Development.” Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1966): 69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, D. P. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, by John Stuart Mill. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. ⅼⅹⅲ–ⅽⅹⅲ. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Dryer, D. P. “Justice, Liberty and the Principle of Utility in Mill.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 63–73

Ebenstein, L. “Mill's Theory of Utility.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 539–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Rem B. “Do Pleasures and Pains Differ Qualitatively?” Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1975): 270–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Rem B.. Pleasures and Pains: A Theory of Qualitative Hedonism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979

Edwards, Rem B.. “J. S. Mill and Robert Veatch's Critique of Utilitarianism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (1985): 181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Rem B.. “The Principle of Utility and Mill's Minimizing Utilitarianism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (1986): 125–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, Brian. “Retrospective and Prospective Utilitarianism.” Nous 15 (1981): 325–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, W. D. “‘Ought’ and Motivation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N. S. 48 (1947–8): 111–38. Reprinted in Readings in Ethical Theory, Wilfred Sellars and John Hospers, eds. 492–510. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952

Feagin, Susan L. “Mill and Edwards on the Higher Pleasures.” Philosophy 58 (1983): 244–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankena, William. “Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy.” In Essays in Moral Philosophy, A. I. Melden, ed. 40–81. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958

Frankena, William. Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963

Fullinwider, Robert K. “On Mill's Analogy between Visible and Desirable.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (1972): 17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galle, Peter. “Gruzalski and Ellis on Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 332–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaus, Gerald F. “Mill's Theory of Moral Rules.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (1980): 265–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerrard, Steve. “Desire and Desirability: Bradley, Russell and Moore versus Mill.” In Early Analytic Philosophy. William W. Tait, ed. 37–74. Chicago: Open Court, 1997

Gibbs, B. R. “Higher and Lower Pleasures.” Philosophy 61 (1986): 31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldinger, Milton. “Mill's Attack on Moral Conservatism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1 (1976): 61–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Scott. “The Quality Problem in Utilitarianism.” The Mill News Letter 10 (1975): 9–13Google Scholar

Graff, J. A. “Mill's Quantity-Quality Distinction: A Defence.” The Mill News Letter 7 (1972): 14–18Google Scholar

Green, T. H. Prolegomena to Ethics. 1883. 5th ed., 1906. Oxford: Clarendon, 1929

Griffin, James. Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986

Griffin, N. “A Note on Mr. Cooper's Reconstruction of Mill's ‘Proof.’” Mind 81 (1972): 142–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grote, John. An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy. Joseph Bickersteth Mayor, ed. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co., 1870

Gruzalski, Bart. “Foreseeable Consequence Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 163–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunderson, Martin. “A Millian Analysis of Rights.” Ideas y Valores 106 (April 1998): 3–17Google Scholar

Habibi, Don. “J. S. Mill's Revisionist Utilitarianism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (1998): 89–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, E. W. “The ‘Proof’ of Utility in Bentham and Mill.” Ethics 60 (1949–50): 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hancock, Roger. “Mill, Saints and Heroes.” The Mill News Letter 10 (1975): 13–15Google Scholar

Harcourt, Edward. “Mill's ‘Sanctions,’ Internalization and the Self.” European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1998): 318–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hare, R. M. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981CrossRef

Harris, George W. “Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (1983): 503–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Jonathan. “Utilitarianism, Universalisation, and Our Duty to Be Just.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society N. S. 53 (1952–3): 105–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Jonathan. “The Expedient, the Right and the Just in Mill's Utilitarianism.” In New Essays in the History of Philosophy, Terence Penelhum and Roger A. Shiner, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 1 (1974): 93–107

Harrod, R. F. “Utilitarianism Revised.” Mind 45 (1936): 137–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hearns, S. J. “Was Mill a Moral Scientist?” Philosophy 67 (1992): 81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, Kenneth Einer. “The Interpretation of Mill's Utilitarianism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (1998): 455–73Google Scholar

Himmelfarb, Gertrude. Introduction to Essays on Politics and Culture, by John Stuart Mill. Gertrude Himmelfarb, ed. New York: Doubleday, 1962; New York: Anchor Books, 1963

Hoag, Robert W. “Mill on Conflicting Moral Obligations.” Analysis 43 (1983): 49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoag, Robert W.. “Happiness and Freedom: Recent Work on John Stuart Mill.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1986): 188–99Google Scholar

Hoag, Robert W.. “Mill's Conception of Happiness as an Inclusive End.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (1987): 417–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoag, Robert W.. “J. S. Mill's Language of Pleasures.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 247–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Christopher A. “Desires and the Desirable.” Philosophical Forum 25 (1993): 19–32Google Scholar

Holbrook, Daniel. Qualitative Utilitarianism. Lanham, MD and London: University Press of America, 1988

Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy. 1755. Reprinted in part in British Moralists, L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897

Jenkins, Joyce I. “Desires and Human Nature in J. S. Mill.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 219–34Google Scholar

Jones, Ernest. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1964

Jones, Hardy. “Mill's Argument for the Principle of Utility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (1978): 338–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Hardy. “John Stuart Mill as Moralist.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (1992): 287–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joy, Glenn C., and McKinney, Audrey M.. “On a Supposed Inconsistency in J. S. Mill's Utilitarianism.” Southwest Philosophical Studies 14 (1992): 84–91Google Scholar

Kamm, Josephine. John Stuart Mill in Love. London: Gordon and Cremonesi Publishers, 1977

Kelly, P. J. “Utilitarian Strategies in Bentham and John Stuart Mill.” Utilitas 2 (1990): 245–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleining, J. “The Fourth Chapter of Mill's Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1970): 197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraut, Richard. “Two Conceptions of Happiness.” Philosophical Review 88 (1979): 167–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretzman, N. “Desire as Proof of Desirability.” Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958): 246–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kupperman, J. “Do We Desire Only Pleasure?” Philosophical Studies 34 (1978): 451–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lachs, John. “Two Views of Happiness in Mill.” The Mill News Letter 9 (1973): 16–20Google Scholar

Lange, Berel and Stahl, Gary. “Mill's ‘Howlers’ and the Logic of Naturalism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (1968–9): 562–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lecky, William Edward Hartpole. History of European Morals. 2 vols. 1869. 3rd ed. New York: D. Appleton, 1890

Levi, A. W. “The Mental Crisis of John Stuart Mill.” Psychoanalytic Review 32 (1945): 86–101Google Scholar

Levin, David Michael. “Some Remarks on Mill's Naturalism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (1969): 291–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, Douglas G. “‘Utility’ and the ‘Utility Principle’: Hume, Smith, Bentham, Mill.” Utilitas 2 (1990): 12–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, Roderick. “Mill's Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 279–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, W. H. “The Legend of Mill's Proofs.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 5 (1967): 36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loren, L. M. “Moore's Criticism of Mill.” Ratio 9 (1967): 84–90Google Scholar

Lyons, David. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965

Lyons, David. “Mill's Theory of Morality.” Nous 10 (1976): 101–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyons, David. “Mill's Theory of Justice.” In Values and Morals: Essays in Honor of William Frankena, Charles Stevenson, and Richard Brandt, A. I. Goldman and J. Kim, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978

Lyons, David. “Benevolence and Justice in Mill.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. 42–70. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982

Lyons, David. Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994

Lyons, David. “Human Rights and the General Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1996–7): 113–29Google Scholar

Lyons, David, ed. Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1997

Mabbott, J. D. “Interpretations of Mill's Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1956): 115–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKensie, John S. A Manual of Ethics. 1883. 6th ed. London: University Tutorial Press, 1929

Malinovich, Stanley. “The Happiness Criterion.” Philosophia 2 (1972): 195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malthus, Thomas. Principles of Political Economy. 1820. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1951

Malthus, Thomas. An Essay on the Principle of Population. 1798. Rev. ed., 1803. Reprinted as An Essay on Population, 2 vols. London: J. M. Dent; New York: E. P. Dutton, 1914. Reprinted as Population: The First Essay. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959

Mandelbaum, Maurice. “On Interpreting Mill's Utilitarianism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (1968): 35–46Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Maurice. “Two Moot Issues in Mill's Utilitarianism.” In Mill: A Collection of Critical Essays, J. B. Schneewind, ed. 206–33. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968

Margolis, Joseph. “Mill's Utilitarianism Again.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (1967): 179–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, John. “The Proof of Utility and Equity in Mill's Utilitarianism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973–4): 13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, John. “Egalitarianism and General Happiness.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. 35–41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982

Martin, Rex. “A Defence of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.” Philosophy 47 (1972): 140–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martineau, James. Types of Ethical Theory. 1855. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901

Mazlish, Bruce. James and John Stuart Mill. New York: Basic Books, 1975

McCloskey, H. J. “An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism.” The Philosophical Review 66 (1957): 466–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloskey, H. J.. John Stuart Mill: A Critical Study. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1971

McGreal, Ian Philip. “Mill.” Chap. 2 in Analyzing Philosophical Arguments. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing, 1967

McNaughton, Robert. “A Metrical Conception of Happiness.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1953–4): 172–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeilly, F. S. “Pre-moral Appraisals.” The Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958): 97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melden, A. I., ed. Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958

Mill, James. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. 2 vols. 1829; 2nd ed., John Stuart Mill, ed. 1869. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1967

Mill, John Stuart. The Letters of John Stuart Mill. 2 vols. H. S. R. Elliot, ed. London: Longmans, Green, 1910

Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. 1848; 6th ed., 1871. Vols. 2–3 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965

Mill, John Stuart. Auguste Comte and Positivism. 1865. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. “Blakey's History of Moral Science.” 1833. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. “Nature.” In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. “Remarks on Bentham's Philosophy.” 1833. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. “Sedgwick's Discourse.” 1835. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. “Theism.” In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. 1861. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. “Utility of Religion.”' In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill 1849–1873. Vols. 14–17 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Francis E. Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1972

Mill, John Stuart. “Whewell on Moral Philosophy.” 1852. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 1843; 8th ed., 1871. Vols. 7–8 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. 1859. In Essays on Politics and Society. Vol. 18 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1977

Mill, John Stuart. “The Protagoras.” 1834. In Essays on Philosophy and the Classics. Vol. 11 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 1978

Mill, John Stuart. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy. 1865; 4th ed., 1872. Vol. 9 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1979

Mill, John Stuart. Autobiography. 1873. Published with parallel texts of the Early Draft, John M. Robson and Jack Stillinger, eds. In Autobiography and Literary Essays. Vol. 1 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson and Jack Stillinger, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1981

Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. 1869. In Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Vol. 21 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, John M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1984

Mill, John Stuart. Miscellaneous Writings. Vol. 31 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, John M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1989

Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Roger Crisp, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998

Miller, Dale E. “Internal Sanctions in Mill's Moral Psychology.” Utilitas 10 (1998): 68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Harlan B., and William H. Williams, eds. The Limits of Utilitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982

Millgram, Elijah. “Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility.” Ethics 110 (2000): 281–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Dorothy. “Mill's Theory of Value.” Theoria 36 (1970): 100–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monro, David Hector. “Mill's Third Howler.” In Contemporary Philosophy in Australia. R. Brown and C. D. Rollins, eds. 190–203. London: Allen and Unwin, 1969

Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. 1903. London and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1959

Moser, Shia. “A Comment on Mill's Argument for Utilitarianism.” Inquiry 6 (1963): 308–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagoka, Shigeo. “On Mill's Qualitative Distinction of Pleasures.” The Mill News Letter 20 (1985): 15–26Google Scholar

Nakhnikian, G. “Value and Obligation in Mill.” Ethics 62 (1951): 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, Kai. “Monro on Mill's ‘Third Howler.’” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1973): 63–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowell-Smith, P. H. Ethics. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1954

Ossowska, Maria. “Remarks on the Ancient Distinction between Bodily and Mental Pleasures.” Inquiry 4 (1961): 123–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, Robert. A New View of Society: or, Essays on the Formation of Character. 1813; 4th ed., 1818. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1972

Packe, Michael St. John. The Life of John Stuart Mill. London: Secker and Warburg, 1954

Patten, S. C. “Some Are Base, Some Are Sublime: A Defence of Hedonistic Utilitarianism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 14 (1980): 275–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, Ingmar. “Mill's Derivation of the Intrinsic Desirability of Pleasure.” History of Philosopohy Quarterly 17 (2000): 297–310Google Scholar

Peterfreund, Sheldon P. “On Mill's Higher and Lower Pleasures.” Personalist 57 (1976): 411–12Google Scholar

Philips, Michael. “A Pleasure Paradox.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 323–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plamenatz, John. “John Stuart Mill.” Chap. 8 in The English Utilitarians. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958

Plato. Protagoras. In The Dialogues of Plato. B. Jowett, trans. 1892. New York: Random House, 1937

Popkin, R. H. “A Note on the ‘Proof’ of Utility in J. S. Mill.” Ethics 61 (1950–1): 66–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinton, Anthony. Utilitarian Ethics. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973

Raphael, D. D. “Fallacies in and about Mill's Utilitarianism.” Philosophy 30 (1955): 344–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raphael, D. D.. “J. S. Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility.” Utilitas 6 (1994): 55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. “Two Concepts of Rules.” The Philosophical Review 64 (1955): 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971

Regan, Donald. Utilitarianism and Co-operation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980

Rescher, Nicholas. Distributive Justice. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1966

Rice, Philip Blair. On the Knowledge of Good and Evil. New York: Random House, 1955

Riley, Jonathan. Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988

Riley, Jonathan. “On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure.” Utilitas 5 (1993): 291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riley, Jonathan. “Is Qualitative Hedonism Inconsistent?” Utilitas 11 (1999): 347–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robson, J. M. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968

Robson, J. M.. Textual Introduction to Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Robson, John M., and Michael Laine, eds. James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976

Rogers, Reginald A. P. A Short History of Ethics. 1911. Reprint, London: Macmillan, 1964

Rohatyn, Dennis A. “Hall and Mill's Proof.” Southwest Journal of Philosophy 2 (1971): 113–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohatyn, Dennis A.. “A Note on Kaufmann and Justice.” The Mill News Letter 6 (1971): 23–5Google Scholar

Rohatyn, Dennis A.. “Mill, Kant, and Negative Utility.” Philosophia 5 (1975): 515–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, W. D. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930

Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1946

Ryan, Alan. “Mill and the Naturalistic Fallacy.” Mind 75 (1966): 422–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, Alan. J. S. Mill. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974

Ryan, Alan. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. London: Macmillan; New York: Pantheon Books, 1970; 2nd ed., New York: Macmillan, 1988

Sabine, George H. A History of Political Theory. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961

Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility: A More Than Half-Hearted Defense.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2001): 330–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scarre, Geoffrey. “Happiness for a Millian.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1999): 491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scarre, Geoffrey. “Donner and Riley on Qualitative Hedonism.” Utilitas 9 (1997): 355–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaller, Walter E. “Punishment and the Utilitarian Criterion of Right and Wrong.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (1991): 109–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneewind, J. B. “Concerning Some Criticisms of Mill's Utilitarianism, 1861–76.” In James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference, John M. Robson and Michael Laine, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1976

Schneewind, J. B., ed. Mill's Ethical Writings. London: Collier-Macmillan; New York: Collier Books, 1965

Schneewind, J. B., ed. Mill: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday; London: Macmillan, 1968

Selby-Bigge, L. A., ed. British Moralists, Being Selections from Writers Principally of the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon, 1897

Sellars, Wilfred, and John Hospers, eds. Readings in Ethical Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952

Semmel, Bernard. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984

Seth, James. “The Alleged Fallacies in Mill's ‘Utilitarianism.’” Philosophical Review 17 (1908): 469–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seth, James. A Study of Ethical Principles. 12th ed. New York: 1911

Shaw, William H. Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999

Sheldon, Mark. “Community, History and Proof.” The Mill News Letter 14 (1979): 9–14Google Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry. Outlines of the History of Ethics. 1886; 6th ed., 1931. London: Macmillan, 1954

Sidgwick, Henry. Methods of Ethics. 1874; 7th ed., 1907. London: Macmillan, 1967

Sidgwick, Henry. Practical Ethics: A Collection of Addresses and Essays. London: S. Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan, 1898. Reprint, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998

Singer, Marcus G. “Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.” Mind 86 (1977): 67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, Marcus G.. “Incoherence, Inconsistency and Moral Theory: More on Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 375–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, Marcus G.. “Mill's Stoic Conception of Happiness and Pragmatic Conception of Utility.” Philosophy 75 (2000): 25–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skorupski, John. “The Parts of Happiness.” Philosophical Books 26 (1985): 193–202Google Scholar

Skorupski, John. John Stuart Mill. London and New York: Routledge, 1989

Skorupski, John, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998

Slote, Michael. “Consequentialism.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001

Smart, J. J. C. “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 4 (1956): 344–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smart, J. J. C. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.” In Utilitarianism: For and Against, J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973

Sobel, J. Howard. “‘Everyone,’ Consequences, and Generalization Arguments.” Inquiry 10 (1967): 373–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soles, David E. “Yet Another Paper on Mill's Proof.” Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (1998): 29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorley, W. R. The Ethics of Naturalism. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, 1904

Sorley, W. R.. A History of British Philosophy to 1900. 1920. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965

Sosa, Ernest. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” In Mill's Utilitarianism: Text and Criticism, James M. Smith and Ernest Sosa, eds. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1969

Spence, G. W. “The Psychology behind J. S. Mill's ‘Proof.’” Philosophy 43 (1968): 18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. The English Utilitarians. 3 vols. 1900. Reprint in one vol., New York: Peter Smith, 1950

Stewart, Robert Scott. “Art for Argument's Sake: Saving Mill from the Fallacy of Composition.” Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (1993): 443–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stocker, Michael. “Mill on Desire and Desirability.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (1969): 199–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stout, A. K. “But Suppose Everyone Did the Same.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 32 (1954): 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strasser, Mark. “Mill's Higher and Lower Pleasures Reexamined.” International Studies in Philosophy 17 (1985): 51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strasser, Mark. “Actual versus Probable Utilitarianism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (1989): 585–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strasser, Mark. The Moral Philosophy of John Stuart Mill: Toward Modifications of Contemporary Utilitarianism. Wakefield, VT: Longwood Academic Publishers, 1991

Sumner, L. W. “More Light on the Later Mill.” The Philosophical Review 83 (1974): 504–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sumner, L. W. “The Good and the Right.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 99–114

Sumner, L. W.. “Welfare, Happiness, and Pleasure.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sutherland, J. “An Alleged Gap in Mill's Utilitarianism.” Mind 11 (1886): 597–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sylvester, Robert P. “Pleasures: Higher and Lower.” Personalist 56 (1975): 129–37Google Scholar

Taylor, Helen. Introductory Notice to Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969

Ten, C. L. “Mill and Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 13 (2001): 112–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Laurence. “Moral Psychology.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001

Thomas, William. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985

Toulmin, S. E. An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950

Urmson, J. O. “The Interpretation of the Philosophy of J. S. Mill.” Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1953): 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urmson, J. O.. “A Defence of Intuitionism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75 (1974–5): 111–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, J. “Kagen on Requirements, Mill on Sanctions.” Ethics 54 (1994): 310–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wall, Grenville. “Mill on Happiness as an End.” Philosophy 57 (1982): 537–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walter, Edward. “Revising Mill's Utilitarianism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 12 (1981): 5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walter, Edward. “Mill on Happiness.” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982): 303–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walter, Edward. “A Concept of Happiness.” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987–8): 137–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warke, Tom. “Multi-Dimensional Utility and the Index Number Problem: Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill, and Qualitative Hedonism.” Utilitas 12 (2000): 176–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warnock, Mary. Ethics Since 1900. London: Oxford University Press, 1960

Warnock, Mary. Introduction to Utilitarianism and On Liberty, by John Stuart Mill, with an Introduction by Mary Warnock, ed. 2nd ed. 1–16. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003

Wedar, Sven. Duty and Utility: A Study in English Moral Philosophy. Lund: Berlingska Boktryckeriet, 1951

Wellman, Carl. “A Reinterpretation of Mill's Proof.” Ethics 69 (1958–9): 268–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertz, S. K. “Composition and Mill's Utilitarian Principle.” Personalist 52 (1971): 417–31Google Scholar

West, Henry Robison. “Act-Utilitarianism and Rule-Utilitarianism.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1964

West, Henry Robison. “Reconstructing Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Mind 81 (1972): 256–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, Henry Robison. “Mill's Naturalism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1975): 67–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, Henry Robison. “Mill's Moral Conservatism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1 (1976): 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, Henry Robison. “Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.” Philosophy 51 (1976): 101–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, Henry Robison. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982

West, Henry Robison. “Consequentialism.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Supplement. 101–2. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1996

West, Henry Robison. “Mill, John Stuart.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Supplement. 346–7. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1996

West, Henry Robison. “Mill, John Stuart.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. 1098–1104. New York and London: Routledge, 2001

White, Morton. “Desire and Desirability: A Rejoinder to a Posthumous Reply by John Dewey.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (1996): 229–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Fred. “Mill's Proof That Happiness Is the Criterion of Morality.” Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1982): 59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Fred. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of Utility and the Composition of Causes.” Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1983): 135–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. 3rd ed. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1971

Wolf, Jean Claude. John Stuart Mill's ‘Utilitarismus.’ Freiburg and Munich: Alber, 1992

Zimmerman, Michael J. “Mill and the Consistency of Hedonism.” Philosophia 13 (1983): 317–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zinkernagel, Peter. “Revaluation of J. S. Mill's Ethical Proof.” Theoria 18 (1952): 70–7Google Scholar