Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T12:14:54.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Select bibliography

Noah Lemos
Noah Lemos
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary, Virginia
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge , pp. 219 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeder, Robert, Blind Realism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992).Google Scholar
Almeder, Robert“On Naturalizing Epistemology,”American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 (1990), 263–79.Google Scholar
Alston, William, Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Alston, WilliamThe Reliability of Sense Perception (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Alston, William“Two Types of Foundationalism,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William“Some Remarks on Chisholm's Epistemology,”Nous, 14 (1980), 565–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William“How to Think About Reliability,”Philosophical Topics (1995), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William “A ‘Doxastic Practice’ Approach to Epistemology,” Empirical Knowledge, 2nd edn., ed. Moser, Paul K. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Amico, Robert P., The Problem of the Criterion (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert, Belief, Justification, and Knowledge (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1988).Google Scholar
Audi, RobertThe Structure of Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert “The Sources of Knowledge,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Metaphysics, trans. W. D. Ross in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard (New York: Random House, 1941).Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, Belief, Truth, and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akins, Kathleen (ed.), Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Augustine, On the Trinity in The Essential Augustine, ed. Bourke, Vernon J. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1974).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., The Problem of Knowledge (New York: St. Martin's Press, Inc., 1955).Google Scholar
Baergen, Ralph, Contemporary Epistemology (Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace and Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Bealer, George, “A Theory of the A Priori,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 ( 1999), 29–57.Google Scholar
Bender, John, W. (ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory: Critical Essays on the Epistemic Theories of Keith Lehrer and Laurence BonJour, with Replies (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Michael, Justification without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, George, Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, ed. Adams, Robert Merrihew (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979).Google Scholar
Berkeley, GeorgeA Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, ed. Turbayne, Colin M. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957).Google Scholar
Blanshard, Brand, The Nature of Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1940).Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
BonJour, LaurenceEpistemology (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002).Google Scholar
BonJour, LaurenceIn Defense of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BonJour, Laurence“Reply to Steup,”Philosophical Studies, 55, 57–63.CrossRef
BonJour, Laurence “Internalism and Externalism,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence and Sosa, Ernest, Epistemic Justification (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar
Butchvarov, Panayot, Skepticism about the External World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald, “Evolutionary Epistemology,” The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. Schillp, Paul (LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1974).Google Scholar
Casullo, Albert, A Priori Justification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casullo, Albert “A Priori Justification,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick, Perceiving: A Philosophical Study (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Chisholm, RoderickThe Problem of the Criterion (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Chisholm, RoderickTheory of Knowledge (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966); 2nd edn., 1977; 3rd edn., 1989.Google Scholar
Chisholm, RoderickThe Foundations of Knowing (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick “On the Nature of Empirical Evidence,” Empirical Knowledge: Readings from Contemporary Sources, eds. Chisholm, Roderick M. and Swartz, Robert J. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1973).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick“The Status of Epistemic Principles,”Nous, 24 (1990), 209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, Marjorie and Lehrer, Keith, Knowledge and Skepticism (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cohen, Stewart, “Justification and Truth,”Philosophical Studies, 46 ( 1984), 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Stewart“Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), 57–89.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stewart“Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65 ( 2002), 209–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, Earl, “The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification,”The Monist, 46 (1984), 279–95.Google Scholar
Conee, Earl and Feldman, Richard, Evidentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, Earl, Feldman, Richard“Evidentialism,”Philosophical Studies, 48, 15–44.
Conee, Earl, Feldman, RichardThe Generality, et al., “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism,” Philosophical Studies, 89 ( 1998), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornman, James, Perception, Common Sense, and Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Crumley, Jack S., An Introduction to Epistemology (Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1999).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan, Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan and Sosa, Ernest, A Companion to Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,” in Kant oder Hegel, ed. Dieter, Henrich (Stuttgart: Klein-Cotta, 1983).Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael (ed.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999).Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael (ed.), Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001).Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René, Meditations in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 2, eds. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
DeRose, Keith, “Solving the Skeptical Problem,”Philosophical Review, 104 (1995), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith and Warfield, Ted A. (eds.), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred, Knowledge and the Flow of Information (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Dretzke, Fred“Epistemic Operators,”Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), 1007–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, Katherine, Considered Judgment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard, Epistemology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003).Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard“An Alleged Defect in Gettier Counterexamples,”Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 52 ( 1974), 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard“Reliability and Justification,”Monist, 68 (1985), 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard“Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions,”Philosophical Studies, 103 ( 2001), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, Richard, Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Richard, The Theory of Epistemic Rationality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, RichardWorking Without a Net (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Foley, Richard“What's Wrong with Reliabilism,”The Monist, 68 (1985), 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Peter, Uehling, Theodore E. and Wettstein, Howard K. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy5 (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard, Metaepistemology and Skepticism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard “Theories of Justification,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”Analysis, 23 ( 1963), 121–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alan, Empirical Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin, Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Goldman, AlvinLiaisons: Philosophy, the Cognitive and the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin“A Causal Theory of Knowing,”The Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1967), 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin“Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 771–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin “What is Justified Belief,” Justification and Knowledge, ed. Pappas, George (Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel, 1979), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin“Strong and Weak Justification,”Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 51–69.CrossRef
Goldman, Alvin “The Sciences and Epistemology,” in The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Greco, John, Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and their Role in Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, John (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, John “Virtues in Epistemology,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Greco, John and Sosa, Ernest, The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, Susan, Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar
Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Harman, GilbertChange in View (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert “Inference to the Best Explanation,” The Theory of Knowledge: Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Pojman, Louis P. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1993).Google Scholar
Harris, James and Severens, Richard H. (eds.), Analyticity (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970).Google Scholar
Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Hendel, Charles W. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976).Google Scholar
James, William, Essays in Pragmatism (New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1948).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1929).Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon, “What is Naturalized Epistemology?,”Philosophical Perspectives, 2 ( 1988), 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Peter, “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge,”The Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), 471–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Peter“Knowledge, Causality, and Defeasibility,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 792–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Peter “Skepticism,” The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987); 2nd edn., 1994.Google Scholar
Klein, Peter“Beyond Foundationalism and the Coherence Theory,”The Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1980), 597–612.Google Scholar
Klein, Peter“Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action,”Philosophical Review, 92 (1983), 33–48.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan, The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind (Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992).Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan (ed.), Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga's Theory Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Kvanvig, JonathanThe Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, trans. Alfred Gideon Langley (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1949).Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith, Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith“Knowledge, Truth, and Evidence,”Analysis, 25 ( 1965), 168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith“The Fourth Condition for Knowledge: A Defense,”The Review of Metaphysics, 24 (1970), 122–28.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith and Cohen, Stewart, “Justification, Truth and Coherence,”Synthese, 55 ( 1983), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, Noah, Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter, Inference to the Best Explanation (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Luper-Foy, Steven (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1987).Google Scholar
Lycan, William, Judgment and Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lycan, William“Moore Against the New Skeptics,”Philosophical Studies, 103 (2001), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffie, James, “Recent Work in Naturalized Epistemology,”American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 ( 1990), 281–93.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979).Google Scholar
Montmarquet, James, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E., “Some Judgments of Perception,” Philosophical Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. “Proof of an External World,” Philosophical Papers (New York: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. “Hume's Philosophy Examined,” Some Main Problems of Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1953).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. “A Defence of Common Sense,” Philosophical Papers (New York: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Moser, Paul, Empirical Justification (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).Google Scholar
Moser, PaulKnowledge and Evidence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Moser, PaulPhilosophy After Objectivity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul (ed.), A Priori Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Moser, Paul (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul“Epistemological Fission,”The Monist, 81 (1998), 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul and vander Nat, Arnold (eds.), Human Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Approaches (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995); 2nd edn., 1995; 3rd edn., 2002.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul, Mulder, Dwayne, H., and Trout, J. D. (eds.), The Theory of Knowledge: A Thematic Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Nozick, RobertThe Nature of Rationality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Pappas, George (ed.), Justification and Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, George and Swain, Marshall (eds.), Essays on Knowledge and Justification (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, Warrant: The Current Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, AlvinWarrant and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, Meno, trans. Grube, G. M. A. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1976).Google Scholar
Pojman, Louis P., What Can We Know?, 2nd edn. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2001).Google Scholar
Pollock, John and Cruz, Joseph, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd edn. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999).Google Scholar
Price, H. H., Perception (New York: Robert McBride, 1933).Google Scholar
Pryor, James, “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist,”Nous, 34 (2000), 517–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, James “What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?,” Philosophical Issues, 14 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V., Word and Object (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper and Row, 1953), pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. “Epistemology Naturalized,” Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. “The Nature of Natural Knowledge,” Mind and Language, ed. Guttenplan, Samuel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Quinton, Anthony, “The A Priori and the Analytic,” Necessary Truth, ed. Sleigh, Robert (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Reid, ThomasInquiry and Essays, eds. Beanblossom, Ronald E. and Lehrer, Keith (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983).Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicolas, Scepticism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Roth, Michael and Galis, Leon, Knowing: Essays in the Analysis of Knowledge (New York: Random House, 1970).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Russell, BertrandHuman Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (New York: Allen and Unwin, 1948).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Frederick, Knowledge and Belief (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Shope, Robert, The Analysis of Knowing: A Decade of Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Shope, Robert“The Conditional Fallacy in Contemporary Philosophy,”The Journal of Philosophy, 75 (1978), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shope, Robert “Conditions and Analyses of Knowing,” in The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul K. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian, “The Explication of ‘X knows that p’,”The Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1967), 373–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest, Knowledge in Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest“The Foundations of Foundationalism,”Nous, 14 (1980), 547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume V (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press, 1980), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest “Philosophical Scepticism and Epistemic Circularity,” Empirical Knowledge, 2nd edn., ed. Moser, Paul K. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996), pp. 303–29.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest“How to Defeat Opposition to Moore,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), 141–53.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest and Kim, Jaegwon (eds.), Epistemology (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest and Villanueva, Enrique (eds.), Philosophical Issues, 14 Epistemology (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Steup, Matthias, An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996).Google Scholar
Steup, MatthiasKnowledge, Truth, and Duty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, Stephen, The Fragmentation of Reason (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Stine, Gail, “Dretske on Knowing the Logical Consequences,”Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), 296–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F., Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry, The Significance of Philosophical Skepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, Donna, “Modest A Priori Knowledge,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51 (1991), 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tienson, John, “On Analyzing Knowledge,”Philosophical Studies, 25 ( 1974), 289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomberlin, James (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2 Epistemology (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1988).Google Scholar
Tienson, John (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 13 Epistemology (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Cleve, James, “Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle,”Philosophical Review, 88 (1979), 55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, James“Epistemic Supervenience and the Circle of Beliefs,”Monist, 68 (1985), 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, James“Supervenience and Closure,”Philosophical Studies, 58 (1990), 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Jonathan, “Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation,”The Journal of Philosophy, 87 (1990), 658–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Jonathan“Reliabilism Leveled,”The Journal of Philosophy, 97 ( 2000), 602–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael, Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy, Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda, Virtues of the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda “What is Knowledge?,” The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, eds. Ernest, Sosa and John, Greco (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda and Fairweather, A. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Almeder, Robert, Blind Realism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992).Google Scholar
Almeder, Robert“On Naturalizing Epistemology,”American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 (1990), 263–79.Google Scholar
Alston, William, Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Alston, WilliamThe Reliability of Sense Perception (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Alston, William“Two Types of Foundationalism,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William“Some Remarks on Chisholm's Epistemology,”Nous, 14 (1980), 565–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William“How to Think About Reliability,”Philosophical Topics (1995), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William “A ‘Doxastic Practice’ Approach to Epistemology,” Empirical Knowledge, 2nd edn., ed. Moser, Paul K. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Amico, Robert P., The Problem of the Criterion (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert, Belief, Justification, and Knowledge (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1988).Google Scholar
Audi, RobertThe Structure of Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert “The Sources of Knowledge,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Metaphysics, trans. W. D. Ross in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard (New York: Random House, 1941).Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, Belief, Truth, and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akins, Kathleen (ed.), Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Augustine, On the Trinity in The Essential Augustine, ed. Bourke, Vernon J. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1974).Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., The Problem of Knowledge (New York: St. Martin's Press, Inc., 1955).Google Scholar
Baergen, Ralph, Contemporary Epistemology (Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace and Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Bealer, George, “A Theory of the A Priori,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 ( 1999), 29–57.Google Scholar
Bender, John, W. (ed.), The Current State of the Coherence Theory: Critical Essays on the Epistemic Theories of Keith Lehrer and Laurence BonJour, with Replies (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Michael, Justification without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, George, Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, ed. Adams, Robert Merrihew (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979).Google Scholar
Berkeley, GeorgeA Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, ed. Turbayne, Colin M. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957).Google Scholar
Blanshard, Brand, The Nature of Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1940).Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
BonJour, LaurenceEpistemology (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002).Google Scholar
BonJour, LaurenceIn Defense of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BonJour, Laurence“Reply to Steup,”Philosophical Studies, 55, 57–63.CrossRef
BonJour, Laurence “Internalism and Externalism,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence and Sosa, Ernest, Epistemic Justification (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar
Butchvarov, Panayot, Skepticism about the External World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald, “Evolutionary Epistemology,” The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. Schillp, Paul (LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1974).Google Scholar
Casullo, Albert, A Priori Justification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casullo, Albert “A Priori Justification,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick, Perceiving: A Philosophical Study (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Chisholm, RoderickThe Problem of the Criterion (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Chisholm, RoderickTheory of Knowledge (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966); 2nd edn., 1977; 3rd edn., 1989.Google Scholar
Chisholm, RoderickThe Foundations of Knowing (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick “On the Nature of Empirical Evidence,” Empirical Knowledge: Readings from Contemporary Sources, eds. Chisholm, Roderick M. and Swartz, Robert J. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1973).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick“The Status of Epistemic Principles,”Nous, 24 (1990), 209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, Marjorie and Lehrer, Keith, Knowledge and Skepticism (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cohen, Stewart, “Justification and Truth,”Philosophical Studies, 46 ( 1984), 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Stewart“Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), 57–89.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stewart“Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65 ( 2002), 209–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, Earl, “The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification,”The Monist, 46 (1984), 279–95.Google Scholar
Conee, Earl and Feldman, Richard, Evidentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, Earl, Feldman, Richard“Evidentialism,”Philosophical Studies, 48, 15–44.
Conee, Earl, Feldman, RichardThe Generality, et al., “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism,” Philosophical Studies, 89 ( 1998), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornman, James, Perception, Common Sense, and Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Crumley, Jack S., An Introduction to Epistemology (Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1999).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan, Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan and Sosa, Ernest, A Companion to Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,” in Kant oder Hegel, ed. Dieter, Henrich (Stuttgart: Klein-Cotta, 1983).Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael (ed.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999).Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael (ed.), Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001).Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René, Meditations in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 2, eds. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
DeRose, Keith, “Solving the Skeptical Problem,”Philosophical Review, 104 (1995), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith and Warfield, Ted A. (eds.), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred, Knowledge and the Flow of Information (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Dretzke, Fred“Epistemic Operators,”Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), 1007–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, Katherine, Considered Judgment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard, Epistemology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003).Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard“An Alleged Defect in Gettier Counterexamples,”Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 52 ( 1974), 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard“Reliability and Justification,”Monist, 68 (1985), 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard“Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions,”Philosophical Studies, 103 ( 2001), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, Richard, Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Richard, The Theory of Epistemic Rationality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, RichardWorking Without a Net (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Foley, Richard“What's Wrong with Reliabilism,”The Monist, 68 (1985), 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Peter, Uehling, Theodore E. and Wettstein, Howard K. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy5 (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard, Metaepistemology and Skepticism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard “Theories of Justification,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”Analysis, 23 ( 1963), 121–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alan, Empirical Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin, Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Goldman, AlvinLiaisons: Philosophy, the Cognitive and the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin“A Causal Theory of Knowing,”The Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1967), 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin“Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 771–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin “What is Justified Belief,” Justification and Knowledge, ed. Pappas, George (Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel, 1979), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin“Strong and Weak Justification,”Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 51–69.CrossRef
Goldman, Alvin “The Sciences and Epistemology,” in The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Greco, John, Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and their Role in Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, John (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, John “Virtues in Epistemology,” The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Greco, John and Sosa, Ernest, The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, Susan, Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar
Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Harman, GilbertChange in View (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert “Inference to the Best Explanation,” The Theory of Knowledge: Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Pojman, Louis P. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1993).Google Scholar
Harris, James and Severens, Richard H. (eds.), Analyticity (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970).Google Scholar
Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Hendel, Charles W. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976).Google Scholar
James, William, Essays in Pragmatism (New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1948).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1929).Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon, “What is Naturalized Epistemology?,”Philosophical Perspectives, 2 ( 1988), 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Peter, “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge,”The Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), 471–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Peter“Knowledge, Causality, and Defeasibility,”The Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), 792–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Peter “Skepticism,” The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, ed. Moser, Paul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987); 2nd edn., 1994.Google Scholar
Klein, Peter“Beyond Foundationalism and the Coherence Theory,”The Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1980), 597–612.Google Scholar
Klein, Peter“Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action,”Philosophical Review, 92 (1983), 33–48.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan, The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind (Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992).Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan (ed.), Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga's Theory Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Kvanvig, JonathanThe Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, trans. Alfred Gideon Langley (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1949).Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith, Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith“Knowledge, Truth, and Evidence,”Analysis, 25 ( 1965), 168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith“The Fourth Condition for Knowledge: A Defense,”The Review of Metaphysics, 24 (1970), 122–28.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith and Cohen, Stewart, “Justification, Truth and Coherence,”Synthese, 55 ( 1983), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, Noah, Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter, Inference to the Best Explanation (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Luper-Foy, Steven (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1987).Google Scholar
Lycan, William, Judgment and Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lycan, William“Moore Against the New Skeptics,”Philosophical Studies, 103 (2001), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffie, James, “Recent Work in Naturalized Epistemology,”American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 ( 1990), 281–93.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979).Google Scholar
Montmarquet, James, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E., “Some Judgments of Perception,” Philosophical Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. “Proof of an External World,” Philosophical Papers (New York: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. “Hume's Philosophy Examined,” Some Main Problems of Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1953).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. “A Defence of Common Sense,” Philosophical Papers (New York: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar
Moser, Paul, Empirical Justification (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).Google Scholar
Moser, PaulKnowledge and Evidence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Moser, PaulPhilosophy After Objectivity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul (ed.), A Priori Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Moser, Paul (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul“Epistemological Fission,”The Monist, 81 (1998), 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul and vander Nat, Arnold (eds.), Human Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Approaches (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995); 2nd edn., 1995; 3rd edn., 2002.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul, Mulder, Dwayne, H., and Trout, J. D. (eds.), The Theory of Knowledge: A Thematic Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Nozick, RobertThe Nature of Rationality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Pappas, George (ed.), Justification and Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, George and Swain, Marshall (eds.), Essays on Knowledge and Justification (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, Warrant: The Current Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, AlvinWarrant and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, Meno, trans. Grube, G. M. A. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1976).Google Scholar
Pojman, Louis P., What Can We Know?, 2nd edn. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2001).Google Scholar
Pollock, John and Cruz, Joseph, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd edn. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999).Google Scholar
Price, H. H., Perception (New York: Robert McBride, 1933).Google Scholar
Pryor, James, “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist,”Nous, 34 (2000), 517–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, James “What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?,” Philosophical Issues, 14 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V., Word and Object (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper and Row, 1953), pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. “Epistemology Naturalized,” Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. “The Nature of Natural Knowledge,” Mind and Language, ed. Guttenplan, Samuel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Quinton, Anthony, “The A Priori and the Analytic,” Necessary Truth, ed. Sleigh, Robert (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Reid, ThomasInquiry and Essays, eds. Beanblossom, Ronald E. and Lehrer, Keith (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983).Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicolas, Scepticism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Roth, Michael and Galis, Leon, Knowing: Essays in the Analysis of Knowledge (New York: Random House, 1970).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Russell, BertrandHuman Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (New York: Allen and Unwin, 1948).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Frederick, Knowledge and Belief (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Shope, Robert, The Analysis of Knowing: A Decade of Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Shope, Robert“The Conditional Fallacy in Contemporary Philosophy,”The Journal of Philosophy, 75 (1978), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shope, Robert “Conditions and Analyses of Knowing,” in The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser, Paul K. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian, “The Explication of ‘X knows that p’,”The Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1967), 373–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest, Knowledge in Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest“The Foundations of Foundationalism,”Nous, 14 (1980), 547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume V (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press, 1980), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest “Philosophical Scepticism and Epistemic Circularity,” Empirical Knowledge, 2nd edn., ed. Moser, Paul K. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996), pp. 303–29.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest“How to Defeat Opposition to Moore,”Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (1999), 141–53.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest and Kim, Jaegwon (eds.), Epistemology (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest and Villanueva, Enrique (eds.), Philosophical Issues, 14 Epistemology (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Steup, Matthias, An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996).Google Scholar
Steup, MatthiasKnowledge, Truth, and Duty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, Stephen, The Fragmentation of Reason (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Stine, Gail, “Dretske on Knowing the Logical Consequences,”Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), 296–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F., Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry, The Significance of Philosophical Skepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, Donna, “Modest A Priori Knowledge,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51 (1991), 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tienson, John, “On Analyzing Knowledge,”Philosophical Studies, 25 ( 1974), 289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomberlin, James (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2 Epistemology (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1988).Google Scholar
Tienson, John (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 13 Epistemology (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Cleve, James, “Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle,”Philosophical Review, 88 (1979), 55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, James“Epistemic Supervenience and the Circle of Beliefs,”Monist, 68 (1985), 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, James“Supervenience and Closure,”Philosophical Studies, 58 (1990), 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Jonathan, “Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation,”The Journal of Philosophy, 87 (1990), 658–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Jonathan“Reliabilism Leveled,”The Journal of Philosophy, 97 ( 2000), 602–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael, Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy, Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda, Virtues of the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda “What is Knowledge?,” The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, eds. Ernest, Sosa and John, Greco (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda and Fairweather, A. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select bibliography
  • Noah Lemos, College of William and Mary, Virginia
  • Book: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801525.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select bibliography
  • Noah Lemos, College of William and Mary, Virginia
  • Book: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801525.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select bibliography
  • Noah Lemos, College of William and Mary, Virginia
  • Book: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801525.012
Available formats
×