from PART II - ARBITRATION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
OVERVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO ARBITRATION OR TO THE JUDICIAL PROCESS
In chapter 25 of Volume I, it was suggested that there are five constellations of procedural principles relating to court proceedings, and the judicial process in general. Not all of these principles apply to arbitration.
For convenience, these major principles will be restated here briefly (those principles, namely II, IV, VI and XIV, which do not apply to arbitration will be marked in bold; as for the principle of finality, which is respected more intensely within arbitration law, when compared with litigation, this is underlined in the text below).
(1) ADVICE AND ACCESS: EMPOWERING THE PARTIES
I. Rights of Legal Consultation and Representation
II. Access to Court and to Justice (arbitration is an opting-out from public adjudication)
III. Protection against Bad or Spurious Claims and Defences
(2) CONDITIONS FOR SOUND DECISION-MAKING
IV. Judicial Independence (not a separate requirement in English arbitration law)
V. Judicial Impartiality
VI. Publicity and Open Justice (arbitration is a consensual retreat from open and public justice)
VII. Judicial Duty to Give Reasons
(3) AN EFFICIENT PROCESS
VIII. Judicial Control of the Civil Process to Ensure Focus and Proportionality
IX. Avoidance of Undue Delay
(4) A FAIR PROCESS
X. Judicial Duty to Avoid Surprise: The Principle of Due Notice
XI. Procedural Equality (equal respect for the parties)
XII. Equal Access to Information, including Disclosure of Information between Parties
XIII. Fair Play between the Parties
XIV. Accuracy of Decision-making (the arbitral tribunal is shielded from judicial scrutiny of the merits of the decision underpinning the relevant award – that is, the decision on the substance of the dispute; in England this shield applies to findings of fact and applications of foreign law, but section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 permits the High Court to control applications for review of arbitral findings of English law.)
(5) UPHOLDING JUDGMENT
XV. Finality (arbitration respects the principle of finality more intensely than court adjudication)
XVI. Effectiveness
We will see that the arbitral process substantially embodies the same fundamental principles as court proceedings. However, diff erences do exist: in respect of access (the choice of arbitration precluding resort to the court on questions concerning the merits or the substance of the dispute), publicity, accuracy, finality, and independence.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.