Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T02:20:12.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 32 - Splenectomy

Indications and Consequences

from Section 5 - Management of Anemia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

Edward J. Benz, Jr.
Affiliation:
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Nancy Berliner
Affiliation:
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
Fred J. Schiffman
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital, Boston
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Anemia
Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management
, pp. 223 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schilling, RF. Risks and benefits of splenectomy versus no splenectomy for hereditary spherocytosis – a personal view. Br J Hematol. 2009; 145:728732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, RF, Gangnon, RE, Traver, MI. Delayed adverse vascular events after splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 6:12891295.Google Scholar
Jaı¨s, X, Ioos, V, Jardim, C, et al. Splenectomy and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Thorax. 2005; 60:10311034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeper, MM, Neidermeyer, J, Hoffmeyer, F, et al. Pulmonary hypertension after splenectomy? Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130:506509.Google Scholar
Buesing, KL et al. Partial splenectomy for hereditary spherocytosis: a multi-institutional review. J Pediatric Surg. 2011:46(1):178183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seims, AD et al. Partial versus total splenectomy in children with hereditary spherocytosis. Surgery. 2013; 154(4):849855.Google Scholar
Lechner, K, Jager, U. How I treat autoimmune hemolytic anemias in adults. Blood. 2010; 116(11):18311838.Google Scholar
Li, Y et al. Splenectomy in the management of Evans syndrome in adult: Long-term follow-up of 32 patients. Surgical Practice. 2014; 18(1):1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaime-Perez, JC, Rodriguez-Martiniez, M, Gomez-de-Leon, A, Tarin-Arzaga, L, Gomez-Almaguer, D. Current approaches for the treatment of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2013; 61:385395.Google Scholar
Akpek, G, McAneny, D, Weintraub, L. Comparative response to splenectomy in Coombs-positive autoimmune hemolytic anemia with or without associated disease. Am J Hematol. 1999; 61:98102.Google Scholar
Rachmilewitz, E, Giardina, P. How I treat thalassemia. Blood. 2011; 118:34793488.Google Scholar
Graziano, JH, Piomelli, S, Hilgartner, M, et al. Chelation therapy in beta thallasemia major: the role of splenectomy in achieving iron balance. J Pediatriacs. 1981; 99(5):695699.Google Scholar
Casale, M, Cinque, P, Ricchi, P, Constantini, S, Spasiano, A, Prossomariti, L, Minelli, S, Frega, V, Filosa, A. Effect of splenectomy on iron balance in patients with B-thalassemia major: a long term follow-up. Eur Hematol. 2013; 91(69–73):__.Google Scholar
Taher, AT, Mussallam, KM, Karimi, M, et al. Overview on practices in thalassemia intermedia management aiming for lowering complication rates across a region of endemicity: the OPTIMAL CARE study. Blood. 2010; 115(10):18861892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashba, EJ, Rowe, JM, Packman, CH. Treatment of the neutropenia of Felty Syndrome. Blood Rev. 1996; 10:177184.Google Scholar
Lamy, T, Loughran, T. How I treat LGL leukemia. Blood. 2011; 117:27642774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesa, RA, Nagorney, DS, Schwager, S, Allred, J, Tefferi, A. Palliative goals, patient selection, and perioperative platelet management; outcomes and lessons from 3 decades of splenectomy for myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia at the Mayo Clinic. Cancer. 2006; 107(2):361370.Google Scholar
Cervantes, F. How I treat splenomegaly in myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J. 2011; 1(10):e37.Google Scholar
Bell, RL et al. A ten-year, single institution experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. JSLS. 2005 Apr–Jun; 9(2):163168.Google Scholar
Harris, W, Marcaccio, M. Incidence of portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy. Can J Surg. 2005 Oct; 48(5):352354.Google Scholar
Krauth, MT et al. The postoperative splenic/portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy and its prevention–an unresolved issue. Haematologica. 2008; 93(8):12271232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winslow, ER, Brunt, LM. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: A meta-analysis with an emphasis on complications. Surgery. 2003; 134(4):647653.Google Scholar
Dindo, D et al. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 August; 240(2):205213.Google Scholar
Patel, NY et al. Outcomes and complications after splenectomy for hematologic disorders. Am J Surg. 2012; 204(6):10141020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhandharkar, DS, Katara, AN, Mittal, G, Shah, R, Udwadia, TE. Prevention and management of complications of laparoscopic splenectomy. Ind J Surg. 2011;73(5):324330.Google Scholar
Kristenssen, SY et al. Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free U.S. veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up. Haematologica. 2014;99:392398.Google Scholar
Thomsen, R, Schoonen, M, Farkas, DK, Rils, A, Jacobsen, J, Fryzek, J, Sorensen, HT. Risk of hospital contact with infection in patients with splenectomy: a population based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(8):546556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svensson, M, Wiren, M, Kimby, E, Hagglund, H. Portal vein thrombosis is a common complication following splenectomy in patients with malignant haematological disease. Eur J Haematol. 2006; 77(3):203209.Google Scholar
Vecchio, R, Cacciola, E, Cacciola, RR, Marchese, S, Intagliata, E. Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic and open splenectomy. J Laparoendosc Advanc Surg Techniq. 2011; 21(1):7175.Google Scholar
James, AW, Rabl, C, Westphalen, A, Fogarty, P, Posselt, A, Campos, G. Portomesenteric venous thrombosis after laparoscopic surgery; a systematic literature review. JAMA Surg. 2009; 144(6):520526.Google ScholarPubMed
Danno, K et al. Splanchnic vein thrombosis: new risk factors and management. Surgery. 2009; 145(5):457464.Google Scholar
Crary, SE, Buchanan, GR. Vascular complications after splenectomy for hematologic disorders. Blood. 2009; 114(14):28612868.Google Scholar
Donadini, MP et al. Splanchnic vein thrombosis: new risk factors and management. Thromb Res. 2012; 129(1):S93S96.Google Scholar
Hayag-Barin, JE, Smith, R, Tucker, FC Jr. Hereditary spherocytosis, thrombocytosis, and chronic pulmonary emboli: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Hematol. 1998; 57:8284.Google Scholar
Troendle, SB, Adix, L, Crary, SE, et al. Laboratory markers of thrombosis risk in children with hereditary spherocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007; 49:781785.Google Scholar
Keenan, RD, Boswell, T, Milligan, DW. Do post-splenectomy patients take prophylactic penicillin? Br J Haematol. 1999; 105:509510.Google Scholar
Grohskopf, LA, Sokolow, LZ, Broder, KR, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – United States, 2017–18 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2017;66(No. RR-2):120. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6602a1Google Scholar
Rubin, LG, Schaffner, W. Care of the asplenic patient. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:349356.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine for adults with immunocompromising conditions: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortality Weekly Report. 2012:61(40):816.Google Scholar
Cohn, AC, MacNeil, JR, Clark, TA, Ortega-Sanchez, IR, Briere, EZ, Meissner, HC, Baker, CJ, Messonnier, NE. Prevention and control of the meningococcal disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013:62(RR-2):1.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×