Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Takeuchi, Tsuyoshi 2017. Agonistic display or courtship behavior? A review of contests over mating opportunity in butterflies. Journal of Ethology, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Sherratt, Thomas N and Mesterton-Gibbons, Mike 2017. eLS. p. 1.

    Maestripieri, Dario and Milich, Krista M. 2016. Sex or power? The function of male displays in rhesus macaques. Behaviour, Vol. 153, Issue. 3, p. 245.

    Carvalho, M. R. M. Peixoto, P. E. C. and Benson, W. W. 2016. Territorial clashes in the Neotropical butterfly Actinote pellenea (Acraeinae): do disputes differ when contests get physical?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 70, Issue. 1, p. 199.

    Mesterton-Gibbons, Mike Karabiyik, Tugba and Sherratt, Tom N. 2016. On the Evolution of Partial Respect for Ownership. Dynamic Games and Applications, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 359.

    Takeuchi, Tsuyoshi Yabuta, Shinji and Tsubaki, Yoshitaka 2016. The erroneous courtship hypothesis: do insects really engage in aerial wars of attrition?. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 118, Issue. 4, p. 970.

    Sherratt, T. N. and Mesterton-Gibbons, M. 2015. The evolution of respect for property. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 28, Issue. 6, p. 1185.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: June 2013

7 - Contest behaviour in butterflies: fighting without weapons

Summary

Summary

Since the seminal work of Davies in the late 1970s, territorial male butterfly contests have offered an excellent system for the empirical scrutiny of contest theories, particularly residency-related game-theoretic principles. Because butterflies lack the obvious morphological traits usually associated with animal aggression, their extended and often spectacular aerial duels both defy simple explanation and provide unique empirical opportunities. Residency win rates often approach 100% in this group, which, coupled with the apparently ‘weaponless’ nature of butterflies and the non-contact nature of their disputes, provided the early impetus for tests of the ‘bourgeois’ resident-wins model of contest resolution. Subsequent work has emphasised how potential residency-related RHP asymmetries, including those relating to temporally variable biophysical parameters, such as body temperature, may instead contribute to high rates of residents winning. The balance of empirical work in this group, however, suggests that morphological and/or biophysical factors bear little relevance to content settlement. Contest participation is not obviously mediated by energetics, which contrasts markedly and interestingly with the aerial wars of attrition of other insects, such as odonates. More recent approaches to understanding butterfly contest resolution have led to an appreciation of how life history-level factors, such as ageing and changes in residual reproductive value, may influence aggressive motivation and subsequent levels of contest participation. These principles apply generally, thereby placing butterfly contests as a potentially important system for the empirical investigation of the broader life-historical context of animal aggression.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Animal Contests
  • Online ISBN: 9781139051248
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051248
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Alcock, J (2005) Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Alcock, J & Bailey, WJ (1997) Success in territorial defence by male tarantula hawk wasps, Hemipepsis ustulata: The role of residency. Ecological Entomology, 22, 377–383.
Arnott, G & Elwood, RW (2007) Fighting for shells: How private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274, 3011–3017.
Austad, SN, Jones, WT & Waser, PM (1979) Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: Why does the resident always win? Animal Behaviour, 27, 960–961.
Bergman, M, Gotthard, K, Berger, D, et al. (2007) Mating success of resident versus non-resident males in a territorial butterfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274, 1659–1665.
Berwaerts, K, Dyck, H & Aerts, P (2002) Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Functional Ecology, 26, 484–491.
Bishop, DT & Cannings, C (1978) A generalized war of attrition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 70, 85–124.
Braby, MF, Vila, R & Pierce, NE (2006) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): Higher classification and biogeography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 147, 238–275.
Darwin, C (1874) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
Davies, NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria: The resident always wins. Animal Behaviour, 26,138–147.
Deinert, EI, Longino, JT & Gilbert, LE (1994) Mate competition in butterflies. Nature, 370, 23–24.
Dugatkin, LA (2004) Principles of Animal Behavior. New York, NY: Norton.
Elgar, MA & Pierce, NE (1978) Mating success and fecundity in an ant-tended Lycaenid butterfly. In: Clutton-Brock, TH (ed.) Reproductive Success: Individual Variation in Complex Breeding Systems, pp. 59–75. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Enquist, M & Leimar, O (1990) The evolution of fatal fighting. Animal Behaviour, 39, 1–9.
Fayed, SA, Jennions, MD & Backwell, PRY (2008) What factors contribute to an ownership advantage? Biology Letters, 4, 143–145.
Fischer, K, Perlick, J & Galetz, T (2008) Residual reproductive value and male mating success: Older males do better. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 275, 1517–1524.
Grafen, A (1987) The logic of divisively asymmetric contests: Respect for ownership and the desperado effect. Animal Behaviour, 35, 462–467.
Hardy, ICW (1998) Butterfly battles: On conventional contests and hot property. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 385–386.
Hernandez, MIM & Benson, WW (1998) Small-male advantage in the territorial tropical butterfly Heliconius sara (Nymphalidae): A paradoxical strategy?Animal Behaviour, 56, 533–540.
Jang, Y, Gerhardt, HC & Choe, JC (2008). A comparative study of aggressiveness in eastern North American field cricket species (genus Gryllus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1397–1407.
Johnsson, JL & Forser, A (2002) Residence duration influences the outcome of territorial conflicts in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 282–286.
Jonsson, K (1997) Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos, 78, 57–77.
Kemp, DJ (2000) Contest behavior in male butterflies: Does size matter? Behavioral Ecology, 11, 591–596.
Kemp, DJ (2002a) Sexual selection constrained by life history in a butterfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 1341–1345.
Kemp, DJ (2002b) Butterfly contests and flight physiology: Why do older males fight harder? Behavioral Ecology, 13, 456–461.
Kemp, DJ (2003) Twilight fighting in the evening brown butterfly, Melanitis leda (L.) (Nymphalidae): Age and residency effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 7–13.
Kemp, DJ (2005) Contrasting lifetime patterns of territorial success in the nymphalid butterflies Hypolimnas bolina and Melanitis leda: A question of flight physiology? Australian Journal of Zoology, 53, 361–367.
Kemp, DJ (2006) Ageing, reproductive value, and the evolution of lifetime fighting behaviour. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 88, 565–578.
Kemp, DJ & Alcock, J (2003) Lifetime resource utilization, flight physiology, and the evolution of contest competition in territorial insects. The American Naturalist, 162, 290–301.
Kemp, DJ & Wiklund, C (2001) Fighting without weaponry: A review of male–male contest competition in butterflies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 429–442.
Kemp, DJ & Wiklund, C (2004) Residency effects in animal contests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1707–1711.
Kemp, DJ, Wiklund, C & Gotthard, K (2006a) Life history effects upon contest behaviour: Age as a predictor of territorial contest dynamics in two populations of the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria L. Ethology, 112, 471–477.
Kemp, DJ, Wiklund, C & Dyck, H (2006b) Contest behaviour in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): Seasonal phenotypic plasticity and the functional significance of flight performance. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 403–411.
Kokko, H, Brooks, R, McNamara, JM, et al. (2002) The sexual selection continuum. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 1331–1340.
Kotiaho, J & Simmons, LW (2003) Longevity cost of reproduction for males but no longevity cost of mating or courtship for females in the male-dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus binodus. Journal of Insect Physiology, 49, 817–822.
Leimar, O & Enquist, M (1984) Effects of asymmetries in owner–intruder conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 111, 475–491.
Marden, JH & Rollins, RA (1994) Assessment of energy reserves by damselflies engaged in aerial contests for mating territories. Animal Behaviour, 48, 1023–1030.
Marden, JH & Waage, JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Animal Behaviour, 39, 954–959.
Martínez-Lendech, N, Cordoba-Aguilar, A & Serrano-Meneses, MA (2007) Body size and fat reserves as possible predictors of male territorial status and contest outcome in the butterfly Eumaeus toxea Godart (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Journal of Ethology, 25, 195–199.
Maynard Smith, J & Parker, GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour, 24, 159–175.
Mesterton Gibbons, M, Marden, JH & Dugatkin, LA (1996) On wars of attrition without assessment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 181, 65–83.
Parker, GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 223–243.
Payne, RJH (1998) Gradually escalating fights and displays: The cumulative assessment model. Animal Behaviour, 56, 651–662.
Plaistow, SJ & Siva-Jothy, MT (1996) Energetic constraints and male mate-securing tactics in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263, 1233–1238.
Robertson, KA & Monteiro, A (2005) Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 1541–1546.
Rosenberg, RH & Enquist, M (1991) Contest behaviour in Weidemeyer's admiral butterfly Limenitis weidemeyerii (Nymphalidae): The effects of size and residency. Animal Behaviour, 42, 805–811.
Rutowski, RL (1992) Male mate-locating behavior in the common eggfly, Hypolimnas bolina (Nymphalidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 46, 24–38.
Scott, JA (1974) Mate locating behaviour of butterflies. The American Midland Naturalist, 91, 103–117.
Stjernholm, F, Karlsson, B & Boggs, CJ (2005) Age-related changes in thoracic mass: Possible reallocation of resources to reproduction in butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society, 86, 363–380.
Strohm, E & Daniels, W (2003) Ultrastructure meets reproductive success: performance of a sphecid wasp is correlated with the fine structure of the flight-muscle mitochondria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 749–754.
Stutt, AD & Willmer, P (1998) Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: Do the hottest males always win? Animal Behaviour, 55, 1341–1347.
Takeuchi, T (2006) The effect of morphology and physiology on butterfly territoriality. Behaviour, 143, 393–403.
Tobias, J (1997) Asymmetric territorial contests in the European robin: The role of settlement costs. Animal Behaviour, 54, 9–21.
Wickman, P-O (1992) Sexual selection and butterfly design: A comparative study. Evolution, 46, 1525–1536.
Wickman, P-O & Wiklund, C (1983) Territorial defence and its seasonal decline in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria). Animal Behaviour, 31, 1206– 1216.
Williams, GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. The American Naturalist, 100, 687–690.