Book contents
- Animals in the International Law of Armed Conflict
- Animals in the International Law of Armed Conflict
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Forewords
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I The Need for Protecting Animals in Wartime
- Part II The Protection of Animals in International and Non-international Armed Conflicts
- Part III The Protection of Animals in Specific Situations
- Part IV Enforcement Regimes for the Protection of Animals in Wartime
- Part V Towards Better Protection of Animals in Wartime
- Index
- References
Part III - The Protection of Animals in Specific Situations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2022
Book contents
- Animals in the International Law of Armed Conflict
- Animals in the International Law of Armed Conflict
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Forewords
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I The Need for Protecting Animals in Wartime
- Part II The Protection of Animals in International and Non-international Armed Conflicts
- Part III The Protection of Animals in Specific Situations
- Part IV Enforcement Regimes for the Protection of Animals in Wartime
- Part V Towards Better Protection of Animals in Wartime
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Animals in the International Law of Armed Conflict , pp. 215 - 310Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Select Bibliography
Al-Duaij, Nada, Environmental Law of Armed Conflict (New York: Transnational Publisher 2004).Google Scholar
Finch, Frank R., ‘This Land is our Land: The Environmental Threat of Army Operations’, International Law Studies 69 (1996), 99–115.Google Scholar
Hulme, Karen, ‘Enhancing Environmental Protection During Occupation through Human Rights’, Goettingen Journal of International Law 10 (2020), 203–41.Google Scholar
Select Bibliography
Daskin, Joshua H, and Pringle, Robert M., ‘Warfare and Wildlife Declines in Africa’s Protected Areas’, Nature 553 (2018), 328–32.Google Scholar
Kim, Kwi-Gon, The Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) of Korea: Protection, Conservation and Restoration of a Unique Ecosystem (Heidelberg: Springer 2013).Google Scholar
Maxwell, Sean L. et al., ‘Biodiversity: The Ravages of Guns, Nets and Bulldozers’, Nature 536 (2016), 143–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pons, Niccolò, ‘Animals’, in Djukić, Dražan and Pons, Niccolò (eds.), The Companion to International Humanitarian Law (Leiden: Brill 2018).Google Scholar
Ronzitti, Natalino, ‘Protected Areas’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015), 369–87.Google Scholar
Roscini, Marco, ‘Animals and the Law of Armed Conflict’, 47 Israeli Yearbook of Human Rights 61 (2017), 35–67.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Green War: An Assessment of the Environmental Law of Armed Conflict’, Yale Law Journal 22 (1997), 1–110.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-international Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Todeschini, Vito, ‘Specially Protected Zones’ in Djukić, Dražan and Pons, Niccolò (eds.), The Companion to International Humanitarian Law (Leiden: Brill 2018), 655–6.Google Scholar
Select Bibliography
Doswald-Beck, Louise (ed.), San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995).Google Scholar
Ma, Jinxing and Sun, Shiyan, ‘Restrictions on the Use of Force at Sea: An Environmental Protection Perspective’, International Review of the Red Cross 98 (2016), 515–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscini, Marco, ‘Animals and the Law of Armed Conflict’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 47 (2017), 35–67.Google Scholar
Select Bibliography
Bartolini, Giulio, ‘Charting an Emerging Subject: The Role of the Yearbook of International Disaster Law’, Yearbook of International Disaster Law 1 (2018), 1–4.Google Scholar
Brels, Sabrine, Le droit du bien-être animal dans le monde: Évolution et universalisation (Paris: L’Harmattan 2017).Google Scholar
de Guttry, Andrea, Gestri, Marco and Venturini, Gabriella (eds.), International Disaster Response Law (Heidelberg: Springer 2012).Google Scholar
Sawyer, James and Huertas, Gerardo, Animal Management and Welfare in Natural Disasters (London: Routledge 2018).Google Scholar
Select Bibliography
Baumans, Vera, ‘Use of Animals in Experimental Research: An Ethical Dilemma?’, Gene Therapy 11 (2004), 64–6.Google Scholar
Felsmann, Mariusz Zbigniew et al., ‘Protection of Animals Used in Experiments in Polish Law – History, Present Day and Perspective: A Review’, Veterinarni Medicina 59 (2014), 117–23.Google Scholar
Florence, Geneviève et al., ‘Ethics and Animal Experimentation in Military Research Centers’, Sciences et Techniques de l’Animal de Laboratoire 26 (2001), 95–103.Google Scholar
Gala, Shalin G. et al., ‘Use of Animals by NATO Countries in Military Medical Training Exercises: An International Survey’, Military Medicine 177 (2012), 907–10.Google Scholar
Knight, Andrew, Costs and Benefits of Animal Experiments (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2011).Google Scholar
Russell, William M. S. and Burch, Rex L., The Principle of Humane Experimental Technique (London: Methuen 1959).Google Scholar
Shurcliff, William A., Operation Crossroads: The Official Pictorial Record (New York: William H. Wise 1946).Google Scholar
Smith, Jane A. and Boyd, Kenneth M. (eds.), Lives in the Balance: The Ethics of Using Animals in Biomedical Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994).Google Scholar
Yarri, Donna, The Ethics of Animal Experimentation (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar