Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hirsch, Andrew K. and Tate, Ross 2018. Strict and lazy semantics for effects: layering monads and comonads. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, Vol. 2, Issue. ICFP, p. 1.

    Abramsky, Samson Dawar, Anuj and Wang, Pengming 2017. The pebbling comonad in Finite Model Theory. p. 1.

    Pavlovic, Dusko and Seidel, Peter-Michael 2017. Quotients in monadic programming: Projective algebras are equivalent to coalgebras. p. 1.

    AHMAN, Danel and UUSTALU, Tarmo 2013. Distributive laws of directed containers. Progress in Informatics, p. 3.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1992
  • Online publication date: September 2009

Computational comonads and intensional semantics

Summary

Abstract

We explore some foundational issues in the development of a theory of intensional semantics, in which program denotations may convey information about computation strategy in addition to the usual extensional information. Beginning with an “extensional” category C, whose morphisms we can think of as functions of some kind, we model a notion of computation using a comonad with certain extra structure and we regard the Kleisli category of the comonad as an intensional category. An intensional morphism, or algorithm, can be thought of as a function from computations to values, or as a function from values to values equipped with a computation strategy. Under certain rather general assumptions the underlying category C can be recovered from the Kleisli category by taking a quotient, derived from a congruence relation that we call extensional equivalence. We then focus on the case where the underlying category is cartesian closed. Under further assumptions the Kleisli category satisfies a weak form of cartesian closure: application morphisms exist, currying and uncurrying of morphisms make sense, and the diagram for exponentiation commutes up to extensional equivalence. When the underlying category is an ordered category we identify conditions under which the exponentiation diagram commutes up to an inequality. We illustrate these ideas and results by introducing some notions of computation on domains and by discussing the properties of the corresponding categories of algorithms on domains.

Introduction

Most existing denotational semantic treatments of programming languages are extensional, in that they abstract away from computational details and ascribe essentially extensional meanings to programs.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Applications of Categories in Computer Science
  • Online ISBN: 9780511525902
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525902
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×