Abbott, George C. 1970. ‘British Colonial Aid Policy during the Nineteen Thirties’. Canadian Journal of History 5, no. 1: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Mary (ed.). 1933. Science in the Changing World. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Adams, R. J. Q. 2007. Balfour: The Last Grandee. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Addison, Christopher. 1939. Four and a Half Years: A Personal Diary from June 1914 to January 1919. Vol. 1. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Adelman, Juliana. 2015. Communities of Science in Nineteenth-Century Ireland. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Advisory Council on Scientific Policy. 1960. Annual Report of the Advisory Council for Scientific Policy 1959–60. Cmnd 1167. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Agar, Jon. 2011. ‘Thatcher, Scientist’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 65, no. 3: 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agar, Jon. 2012. Science in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. London: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Agar, Jon. 2016. ‘The Defence Research Committee, 1963–1972’. In Leggett, Don and Sleigh, Charlotte (eds.), Scientific Governance in Britain, 1914–79. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 100–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agar, Jon. 2019. Science Policy under Thatcher. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agar, Jon, and Balmer, Brian. 1998. ‘British Scientists and the Cold War: The Defence Research Policy Committee and Information Networks, 1947–1963’. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 28, no. 2: 209–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, G. C. 1948. Economic Thought and Industrial Policy. An Inaugural Lecture Delivered at University College London, on March 4, 1948. London: H K Lewis.Google Scholar

Alter, Peter. 1987. The Reluctant Patron: Science and the State in Britain 1850–1920. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Altick, Richard D. 1978. The Shows of London. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

AMRC. 2017. Charities’ Funding Contributes to UK Medical Research Excellence. Available at www.amrc.org.uk/news/charities-funding-contributes-to-uk-medical-research-excellence (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Anderson, R. G. W. 1992. ‘“What Is Technology?”: Education through Museums in the Mid-Nineteenth Century’. British Journal for the History of Science 25 no. 2: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Kay. 1975. ‘Politics, Professionalism and the Organisation of Scientists: the Association of Scientific Workers, 1917–1942’. DPhil thesis, Sussex University.Google Scholar

Anduaga, Aitor. 2009. Wireless and Empire: Geopolitics, Radio Industry and Ionosphere in the British Empire, 1918–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anker, Peder. 2001. Imperial Ecology: Environmental Order in the British Empire, 1895–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appleton, Edward V. 1945. ‘The Work of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research’. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 93, no. 4694: 372–84.Google Scholar

Appleton, Edward V. 1959. ‘Notes on Science – Pure and Applied’. British Affairs 3, no. 4: 174–77.Google Scholar

Arapostathis, Stathis. 2012. ‘Electrical Innovations, Authority and Consulting Expertise in Late Victorian Britain’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 67, no. 1: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arapostathis, Stathis, and Gooday, Graeme. 2013. ‘Electrical Technoscience and Physics in Transition, 1880–1920’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, no. 2: 202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archibald, Gail. 2006. ‘How the “S” came to be in UNESCO’. In Petitjean, P., Zharov, V., Glaser, G., Richardson, J., de Padirac, B., and Archibald, G. (eds.), Sixty Years of Science at UNESCO, 1945–2005. Paris: UNESCO, 36–40.Google Scholar

Argles, Michael. 1959. ‘The Royal Commission on Technical Instruction, 1881–4: Its Inception and Composition’. The Vocational Aspect of Education 11, no. 23: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armytage, W. H. G. 1950. ‘J. F. D. Donnelly: Pioneer in Vocational Education’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 2, no. 4: 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armytage, W. H. G. 1953. Civic Universities: Aspects of a British Tradition. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar

Armytage, W. H. G. 1965. The Rise of the Technocrats: A Social History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Arnold, Lorna. 1992. Windscale 1957: Anatomy of a Nuclear Accident. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. 1868a. ‘Report by Mr. Matthew Arnold’. Schools Inquiry Commission. [3966-V]. London: HMSO, Vol. 6, 441–726.Google Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. 1868b. Schools and Universities on the Continent. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Aronova, Elena. 2012. ‘The Congress for Cultural Freedom, Minerva, and the Quest for Instituting “Science Studies” in the Age of Cold War’. Minerva 50, no. 3: 307–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashby, Eric. 1958. Technology and the Academics: An Essay on Universities and the Scientific Revolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ashby, Eric, and Anderson, Mary. 1974. Portrait of Haldane at Work on Education. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashley, Percy. 1904. Modern Tariff History. Germany – United States – France. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Ashworth, William J. 2017. The Industrial Revolution: The State, Knowledge and Global Trade. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Association of Scientific Workers. 1944. Science in the Universities, Report of the Association of Scientific Workers to the University Grants Committee. Oxford: Oxonian Press.Google Scholar

Atkins, Peter J. 2005. ‘The Empire Marketing Board’. In Oddy, D. J. and Petráňová, L. (eds.), The Diffusion of Food Culture in Europe from the Late Eighteenth Century to the Present. Prague: Academic Press, 248–55.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Paul, and Sheard, Sally (eds.). 2018. Origins of the National Institute for Health Research: Transcript of a Witness Seminar Held at the University of Liverpool in London on 28 February 2018. Liverpool: Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Paul, Sheard, Sally, and Walley, Tom. 2019. ‘All the Stars Were Aligned’? The Origins of England’s National Institute for Health Research’. Health Research Policy and Systems 17, no. 95: doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0491-5 (accessed March 2023)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

‘Atomic Research in Britain: First Pictures Harwell Atomic Research Establishment’. 1948. Illustrated London News, 31 July: 132.Google Scholar

Austoker, Joan. 1989. ‘Walter Morley Fletcher and the Origins of a Basic Biomedical Research Policy’. In Austoker, Joan and Bryder, Linda (eds.), Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–33.Google Scholar

Aylen, Jonathan. 2015. ‘First Waltz: Development and Deployment of Blue Danube, Britain’s Post-War Atomic Bomb’. The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology 85, no. 1: 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babbage, Charles. 1832. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Charles Knight.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Reginald Hugh Spencer. 1929. The Life of Lord Fisher of Kilverstone: Admiral of the Fleet. 2 vols. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger E., and Maas, Harro. 2016. ‘Marginalizing Maclaurin: The Attempt to Develop an Economics of Technological Progress at MIT, 1940–50’. History of Political Economy 48, no. 3: 423–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backhouse, Roger E., and Maas, Harro. 2017. ‘A Road Not Taken: Economists, Historians of Science, and the Making of the Bowman Report’. Isis 108, no. 1: 82–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bagrit, Leon. 1965. The Age of Automation. London: Weidenfeld.Google Scholar

Baker, Robert S. 2001. ‘Science and Modernity in Aldous Huxley’s Interwar Essays and Novels’. In Barfoot, C. C. (ed.), Aldous Huxley between East and West. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balconi, Margherita, Brusoni, Stefano, and Orsenigo, Luigi. 2010. ‘In Defence of the Linear Model: An Essay’. Research Policy 39, no. 1: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balfour, Graham. 1903. The Educational Systems of Great Britain and Ireland. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Balls, W. Lawrence. 1926. ‘The Classification of Research Work’. Nature 118, no. 2965: 298–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balmer, Brian. 2015. ‘An Open Day for Secrets: Biological Warfare, Steganography, and Hiding Things in Plain Sight’. In Rappert, Brian and Balmer, Brian (eds.), Absence in Science, Security and Policy: From Research Agendas to Global Strategy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 34–52.Google Scholar

Barker, Ernest. 1932. ‘Universities in Great Britain’. In Kotschnig, Walter M. and Prys, (eds.), The University in a Changing World: A Symposium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 85–120.Google Scholar

Barnes, Sarah V. 1996. ‘England’s Civic Universities and the Triumph of the Oxbridge Ideal’. History of Education Quarterly 36, no. 3: 271–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, Ruth. 1998. ‘Just before Nature: The Purposes of Science and the Purposes of Popularization in Some English Popular Science Journals of the 1860s’. Annals of Science 55, no. 1: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barton, Ruth. 2018. The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M., Durant, J., Ragnarsdottir, A., and Rudolfsdottir, A.. 1995. ‘Science and Technology in the British Press, 1946–90’. 3 vols. Report on Wellcome Trust Grant no 037859/Z/93/Z.Google Scholar

Bauer, M., Petkova, Kristina, Boyadjieva, Pepka, and Gornev, Galin. 2006. ‘Long-Term Trends in the Public Representation of Science across the “Iron Curtain”: 1946–1995’. Social Studies of Science 36, no. 1: 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, Charles A. 1928. ‘Introduction’. In Beard, Charles A. (ed.), Whither Mankind: A Panorama of Modern Civilization. New York: Longmans Green, 1–24.Google Scholar

Beer, Gillian. 1996. ‘“Wireless”: Popular Physics, Radio and Modernism’. In Spufford, Francis and Uglow, Jenny (eds.), Cultural Babbage: Technology, Time and Invention. London: Faber & Faber, 149–66.Google Scholar

Beinart, William, Brown, Karen, and Gilfoyle, Daniel. 2009. ‘Experts and Expertise in Colonial Africa Reconsidered: Science and the Interpenetration of Knowledge’. African Affairs 108, no. 432: 413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belanger, Dian Olson. 1998. Enabling American Innovation: Engineering and the National Science Foundation. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, John. 2017. Life Sciences Industrial Strategy: A Report to the Government from the Life Sciences Sector. Available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/life-sciences-industrial-strategy (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Belloc, Hilaire. 1926. A Companion to Mr. Wells’s ‘Outline of History’. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar

Benn, Anthony Wedgwood. 1969. ‘Government and Technology’. Journal of the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce 117, no. 5151: 155–72.Google Scholar

Bennett, B. M., and Hodge, J. M. (eds.). 2011. Science and Empire: Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire, 1800–1970. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2009. ‘A Historical Perspective on Science and Its “Others”’. Isis 100, no. 2: 359–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2020. ‘At the Boundary between Science and Industrial Practices: Applied Science, Arts, and Technique in France’. Science Museum Group Journal 13 (Spring). https://journal.sciencemuseum.ac.uk/article/arts-and-technique-in-france/#abstract.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Carin, and Lightman, Bernard (eds.). 2017. Science Museums in Transition: Cultures of Display in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernal, J. D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bingham, Adrian. 2004. Gender, Modernity, and the Popular Press in Inter-War Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, J. H. 1949. ‘The Transmission of New Ideas: The Shirley Institute and the Cotton Industry’. Journal of the Textile Institute Proceedings 40, no. 7: 733–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackett, Patrick. 1968. ‘Memorandum to the Select Committee on Science and Technology’. Nature 219, no. 5159: 1107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bland, Lucy, and Hall, Lesley. 2010. ‘Eugenics in Britain: The View from the Metropole’. In Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philipa (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–27.Google Scholar

Blatchford, Ian. 2021. ‘Lyon Playfair: Chemist and Commissioner, 1818–1858’. Science Museum Group Journal 15 (Spring): doi.org/10.15180/211504.Google Scholar

Bloor, David. 2011. The Enigma of the Aerofoil: Rival Theories in Aerodynamics, 1909–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Board of Education. 1905. Preliminary Report of the Departmental Committee on the Royal College of Science and Royal School of Mines. Cd 2610. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Board of Education. 1906. Final Report of the Departmental Committee on the Royal College of Science, etc. Cmd 2872. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Board of Education. 1915. Scheme for the Organisation and Development of Scientific and Industrial Research. Cd 8005. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Board of Trade. 1929. Final Report of the Committee on Industry and Trade. Cmd 3282. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Board of Trade. 1931. Minutes of Evidence Taken before the Departmental Committee on the Patents and Designs Acts and Practice of the Patents Office. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Boden, Rebecca, Cox, Deborah, and Nedeva, Maria. 2006. ‘The Appliance of Science? New Public Management and Strategic Change’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, no. 2: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boden, Rebecca, Cox, Deborah, Nedeva, Maria, and Barker, Kate. 2004. Scrutinising Science: The Changing UK Government of Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boden, Rebecca, Gummett, Philip, Cox, Deborah, and Barker, K. E.. 1998. ‘Men in White Coats … Men in Grey Suits: New Public Management and the Funding of Science and Technology Services to the UK Government’. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 11, no. 3: 267–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boon, Rachel. 2020. ‘The Post Office Research Station at Dollis Hill, 1933–1965’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Bowden, Vivian (Lord). 1965. ‘Expectations for Science’. New Scientist 27, no. 463 (30 September): 849–53; and 28, no. 464 (7 October): 48–52.Google Scholar

Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bowler, Peter J. 2009. Science for All: The Popularization of Science in Early Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Peter J. 2010. Reconciling Science and Religion: The Debate in Early-Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bowler, Peter J., and Whyte, Nicholas (eds.). 1997. Science and Society in Ireland. The Social Context of Science and Technology in Ireland 1800–1950. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, Queens University of Belfast.Google Scholar

Boyle, Alison. 2020. ‘Stories and Silences in Modern Physics Collections: An Object Biography Approach’. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Boyns, Trevor. 1987. ‘Rationalisation in the Inter-War Period: The Case of the South Wales Steam Coal Industry’. Business History 29, no. 3: 282–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Margaret, 2012. Charles Dupin (1784–1873) and His Influence on France: The Contributions of a Mathematician, Educator, Engineer, and Statesman. London: Cambria Press.Google Scholar

Brady, Robert A. 1932. ‘The Meaning of Rationalization: An Analysis of the Literature’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 46, no. 3: 526–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bragg, W. H. 1928. ‘Craftsmanship and Science’. Supplement to Nature 122, no. 3071: 353–63.Google Scholar

Brake, Laurel. 1997. ‘Writing, Cultural Production, and the Periodical Press in the Nineteenth Century’. In Bullen, J. B. (ed.), Writing and Victorianism. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman, 57–72.Google Scholar

Brech, Edward, Thomson, Andrew, and Wilson, John F.. 2010. Lyndall Urwick, Management Pioneer: A Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bret, Patrice. 2002. L’état, l’armée, la science: l’invention de la recherche publique en France, 1763–1830. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

Brewster, David. 1837. ‘Whewell’s History of the Inductive Sciences’. Edinburgh Review 66: 110–51.Google Scholar

Briggs, Asa. 1957. Where We Came In: The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered [A prospectus for Six Broadcast Talks. With Illustrations]. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar

Briggs, Asa. 1995. The History of Broadcasting in the United Kingdom, vol. 2: The Golden Age of Wireless. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘The British Air-Office: A Place of Wind-Towers, Whirling-Tables, and Gales Made to Order’. 1910. The Illustrated London News (2 April): 497.Google Scholar

British Association for the Advancement of Science. 1945. ‘The Place of Science in Industry’. Transactions of a Conference Held by the Division for the Social and International Relations of Science, January 12–13, 1945. The Advancement of Science 3: 106–56.Google Scholar

British Empire Exhibition. 1924. Pavilion of H. M. Government British Empire Exhibition, 1924. London.Google Scholar

Brittain, Vera. 1928. Women’s Work in Modern England. London: Noel Douglas.Google Scholar

Brock, William H. 2002. Justus von Liebig: The Chemical Gatekeeper. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brock, William H. 2008. W. H. William Crookes 1832–1919 and the Commercialization of Science. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Broks, Peter. 1996. Media Science before the Great War. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Harvey (chair). 1971. Science, Growth and Society: A New Perspective. Report of the Secretary General’s ad hoc Group on New Concepts of Science Policy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Brown, Andrew. 2006. J. D. Bernal: The Sage of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, David. 2010. ‘Morally Transforming the World or Spinning a Line? Politicians and the Newspaper Press in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Britain’. Historical Research 83, no. 220: 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlie, David. 1927. ‘Low-Temperature Carbonization: The Situation in Great Britain’. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 19, no. 1: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, Alexandrina. 2013. Robert Willis (1800–1875) and the Foundation of Architectural History. Martlesham: Boydell & Brewer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, R. A. 1966. ‘From Trade School to University: A Microcosm of Social Change’. In Walters, Gerald (ed.), A Technological University: An Experiment in Bath. Bristol: Bath University Press, 12–26.Google Scholar

Buchwald, Jed Z., and Hong, Sungook. 2003. ‘Physics’. In Cahan, David (ed.), From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 163–95.Google Scholar

Buckingham, John. 1952. ‘The Scientific Research Department in the Time of the First Director, 1920–29’. Journal of the Royal Naval Scientific Service 7: 100–103.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert. 1980. ‘The Discipline of Chemistry: The Origin and Early Years of the Chemical Society of London’. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert. 1993. The Uses of Life: A History of Biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert. 1998. ‘Penicillin and the New Elizabethans’. British Journal for the History of Science 31, no. 3: 305–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2007. Penicillin: Triumph and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2008. ‘Upheaval in the Moral Economy of Science? Patenting, Teamwork and the World War II Experience of Penicillin’. History and Technology 24, no. 2: 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2010. ‘From Applied Microbiology to Biotechnology: Science, Medicine and Industrial Renewal’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 64, Suppl. 1 (July): S17–S29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bud, Robert. 2013a. ‘Biological Warfare Warriors, Secrecy and Pure Science in the Cold War: How to Understand Dialogue and the Classifications of Science’. Medicina Nei Secoli 26, no. 2: 451–68.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2013b. ‘Framed in the Public Sphere: Tools for the Conceptual History of “Applied Science”: A Review Paper’. History of Science 51, no. 4: 413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2013c. ‘Infected by the Bacillus of Science’. In Morris, Peter (ed.), Science for the Nation: Perspectives on the History of the Science Museum. London: Palgrave, 11–40.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2014a. ‘“Applied Science” in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Public Discourse and the Creation of Meaning, 1817–1876’. History and Technology 30, nos. 1–2: 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2014b. ‘Responding to Stories: The 1876 Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus and the Science Museum.’ Science Museum Group Journal (Spring): doi.org/10.15180/140104.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2016. ‘Science, Brands and the Museum’. Journal of Science Communication 15, no. 6. https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1506_2016_C03.pdf (accessed March 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2017. ‘“The Spark Gap Is Mightier Than the Pen”: The Promotion of an Ideology of Science in the Early 1930s’. Journal of Political Ideologies 22, no. 2: 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2018a. ‘Categorizing Science in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Britain’. In Kaldewey, David and Schauz, Désirée (eds.), Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Berghahn Books, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2018b. ‘Kantianism, Cameralism and Applied Science’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 72, no. 3: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bud, Robert. 2020. ‘Science and the Press’. In Conboy, Martin and Bingham, Adrian (eds.), The Edinburgh History of the British and Irish Press, vol. 3: Competition and Disruption, 1900–2017. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 612–25.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert, Greenhalgh, Paul, James, Frank, and Shiach, Morag (eds.). 2018. Being Modern: The Cultural Impact of Science in the Early Twentieth Century. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert, and Gummett, Philip (eds.). 1999. Cold War Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain’s Defence Laboratories 1945–1990. Reading: Harwood.Google Scholar

Bud, Robert, and Roberts, Gerrylynn K.. 1984. Science versus Practice: Chemistry in Victorian Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Bunce, John Thackray. 1970. Josiah Mason: A Biography with Sketches of the History of the Steel-Pen and Electro-Plating Trades. 2nd ed. London: W. & R. Chambers [1890].Google Scholar

Burgess, Tyrrell. 1970. Policy and Practice: The Colleges of Advanced Technology. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Burgon, John William. 1891. Lives of Twelve Good Men. New ed. London: Murray.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. 1800. Thoughts and Details on Scarcity. London: F. & C. Rivington.Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. 1960. A Grammar of Motives. First published 1945. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bush, Vannevar. 2020. Science – The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. First issued 1945. Reprinted in celebration of the National Science Foundation’s 70th anniversary. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. www.nsf.gov/about/history/EndlessFrontier_w.pdf.Google Scholar

Butler, Stuart, and Bud, Robert. 2018. ‘United Kingdom, Short Country Report’. History of Nuclear Energy and Society. www.honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/UK.pdf.Google Scholar

Butterworth, H. 1968. ‘The Science and Art Department 1853–1900’. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar

Byatt, I. C. R., and Cohen, A. V.. 1969. An Attempt to Quantify the Economic Benefits of Scientific Research. Department of Education and Science, Science Policy Studies no. 4. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Cahan, David. 2004. An Institute for an Empire: The Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Calder, Peter Ritchie. 1934. The Birth of the Future. London: Arthur Barker.Google Scholar

Campbell, Colin, and Wilson, Graham K.. 1995. The End of Whitehall: Death of a Paradigm? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Campbell, John. 2020. Haldane: The Forgotten Statesman Who Shaped Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannadine, David. 1984. ‘The Present and the Past in the English Industrial Revolution 1880–1980’. Past & Present 103, no. 1: 131–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantor, G. N. 1996. ‘The Scientist as Hero: Public Images of Michael Faraday’. In Shortland, Michael and Yeo, Richard (eds.), Telling Lives in Science: Essays on Scientific Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–93.Google Scholar

Cantor, G. N. 2011. Religion and the Great Exhibition of 1851. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantor, Leonard Martin, and Matthews, Geoffrey Frank. 1977. Loughborough from College to University: A History of Higher Education at Loughborough, 1906–1966. Loughborough: Loughborough University of Technology.Google Scholar

Cardwell, D. S. L. 1972. The Organisation of Science in England. First published 1957. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar

Cardwell, D. S. L. (ed.). 1974. Artisan to Graduate: Essays to Commemorate the Foundation in 1824 of the Manchester Mechanics’ Institution, Now in 1974 the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, Bernard. 1997. ‘Innovation and the Modern Corporation from Heroic Invention to Industrial Science’. In Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique (eds.), Companion to the History of Twentieth-Century Science. Reading: Harwood, 203–26.Google Scholar

Carson, Cathryn. 2010. Heisenberg in the Atomic Age: Science and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, C. F., and Williams, B. R.. 1957. Industry and Technical Progress: Factors Governing the Speed of Application of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, C. F., and Williams, B. R.. 1958. Investment in Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, C. F., and Williams, B. R.. 1959. Science in Industry: Policy for Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, G. B. 2000. Chemical and Biological Defence at Porton Down, 1916–2000. 2nd ed. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Carty, John J. 1916. ‘The Relation of Pure Science to Industrial Research’. Science 44, no. 1137: 511–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Catlin, George Edward Gordon. 1972. For God’s Sake, Go!: An Autobiography. Gerrards Cross: Smythe.Google Scholar

Catterall, Peter (ed.). 2011. The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950–57. London: Pan.Google Scholar

‘The Centenary Journal’. 1966. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 70, no. 661: 90–97.Google Scholar

Central Advisory Council for Science and Technology. 1968. Technological Innovation in Britain. Report of the Central Advisory Council for Science and Technology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Chairmen of the Advisory Council for Applied Research and Development (ACARD) and the Advisory Board for the Research Councils (ABRC). 1976. The Science Base and Industry. Second Joint Report. Cm 34. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Chalaby, Jean K. 1996. ‘Twenty Years of Contrast: The French and British Press during the Inter-War Period’. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 37, no. 1: 143–59.Google Scholar

Chambers, David Wade, and Gillespie, Richard. 2000. ‘Locality in the History of Science: Colonial Science, Technoscience, and Indigenous Knowledge’. Osiris 15, no. 1: 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Channell, David. 1982. ‘The Harmony of Theory and Practice: The Engineering Science of W. J. M. Rankine’. Technology and Culture 23, no. 1: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaptal, Jean-Antoine Claude. 1893. Mes souvenirs sur Napoléon 1er. Ed. Chaptal, A.. Paris: Plon, Nourris.Google Scholar

Charles, G. W. 1951. ‘The Merchant Venturers’ Technical College, Bristol’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 3, no. 6: 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnley, Berris. 2013. ‘Experiments in Empire-Building: Mendelian Genetics as a National, Imperial, and Global Agricultural Enterprise’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, no. 2: 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilvers, C. A. J. 2007. ‘Something Wicked This Way Comes: The Russian Delegation at the 1931 Second International Congress of the History of Science and Technology’. DPhil thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar

Cho, S. K. 2001. ‘The Special Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus, 1876: The Beginning of the Science Museum of London and the Popularization of Physical Science’. PhD thesis, Seoul National University (in Korean).Google Scholar

Christen-Lécuyer, Carole, and Vatin, François (eds.). 2009. Charles Dupin (1784–1873): ingénieur, savant, économiste, pédagogue et parlementaire du Premier au Second Empire. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar

Church, A. G. 1920. ‘Applied Science and Industrial Research’. Nature 105, no. 2640: 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchill, Randolph S. 1969. Winston S. Churchill, vol. 2: Companion Part II, 1907–1911. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Clarke, N. 1951. ‘Impressions of a Discussion on Technical Universities’. British Journal of Applied Physics 2, no. 9: 245–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Richard. 1973a. ‘Mintech in Retrospect: I’. Omega 1, no. 1: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Richard. 1973b. ‘Mintech in Retrospect: II’. Omega 1, no. 2: 137–63.Google Scholar

Clarke, Robin. 1968, ‘How the 300 GeV Decision Was Made.’ Science Journal, March: 4–7.Google Scholar

Clarke, Sabine. 2010. ‘Pure Science with a Practical Aim: The Meanings of Fundamental Research in Britain, circa 1916–1950’. Isis 101, no. 2: 285–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarke, Sabine. 2018. Science at the End of Empire: Experts and the Development of the British Caribbean, 1940–62. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Class, Monica. 2012. Coleridge and Kantian Ideas in England, 1796–1817: Coleridge’s Responses to German Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Clayton, Sir Robert, and Algar, Joan. 1988. The GEC Research Laboratories 1919–1984. London: Peter Peregrinus in association with the Science Museum, London.Google Scholar

Cline, Peter. 2014. ‘Winding Down the War Economy: British Plans for Peacetime Recovery, 1916–19’. In Burk, Kathleen (ed.), War and the State: The Transformation of British Government, 1914–1919. London: Routledge, 157–81.Google Scholar

Cockcroft, John. 1954. ‘Atomic Energy Research at Harwell’. Atomic Scientists Journal 4: 182–92.Google Scholar

Cockcroft, John. 1956. ‘The United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority and Its Functions’. British Journal of Applied Physics 7, no. 2: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard. 1946. ‘Authenticity of Scientific Anecdotes’. Nature 157, no. 3981: 196–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, I. Bernard. 1987. ‘Faraday and Franklin’s “Newborn Baby”’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 131, no. 2: 177–82.Google Scholar

Coleman, D. C. 1956. ‘Industrial Growth and Industrial Revolutions’. Economica n.s. 23, no. 89: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 1852a. ‘Blessed Are Ye That Sow beside all Waters: A Lay Sermon Addressed to the Higher and Middle Classes on the Existing Distresses and Discontents’. First published 1817. In Coleridge, Derwent (ed.), Lay Sermons. 3rd ed. London: Edward Moxon, 127–267.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 1852b. On the Constitution of the Church and the State according to the Idea of Each. 4th ed., ed. Nelson Coleridge, Henry. First published 1830. London: Edward Moxon.Google Scholar

Collins, Peter. 2010. ‘A Royal Society for Technology’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 64, Suppl. 1: S43–S54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Peter. 2016. The Royal Society and the Promotion of Science since 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Collison, Robert. 1966. ‘Samuel Taylor Coleridge and the “Encyclopaedia Metropolitana”’. Journal of World History 9, no. 1: 751–68.Google Scholar

Commission on the College of Science for Ireland. 1867. Report of Commission on the College of Science for Ireland. P.P. 1867 (219) LV. 777-80.Google Scholar

Committee of Enquiry into the Engineering Profession. 1980. Engineering Our Future: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Engineering Profession. Cmnd 7794. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Committee of Enquiry into the Organisation of Civil Science. 1963. Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Organisation of Civil Science, under the Chairmanship of Sir Burke Trend. Cmnd 2171. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Committee on Science and the Public Welfare. 2020. ‘Report of the Committee on Science and the Public Welfare’. Published as part of Science – The Endless Frontier. Reprinted in celebration of the National Science Foundation’s 75th anniversary. Available at www.nsf.gov/about/history/EndlessFrontier_w.pdf, 77–149.Google Scholar

Conant, James Bryant. 1939. ‘Lesson from the Past’. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 31, no. 10: 1215–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conant, James Bryant. 1943. ‘Science and Society in the Post-War World: Interchange of Ideas and Discoveries Necessary’. Vital Speeches of the Day 9, no. 13: 394–97.Google Scholar

Converse, Elliott. 2012. History of Acquisition in the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: Historical Office, Office of the Secretary of Defense.Google Scholar

Cooksey, David. 2006. A Review of UK Health Research Funding. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar

Cooper, Timothy. 2003. ‘The Science-Industry Relationship: The Case of Electrical Engineering in Manchester, 1914–1960’. PhD thesis, Manchester University.Google Scholar

Cooper, Timothy. 2011. ‘Peter Lund Simmonds and the Political Ecology of Waste Utilization in Victorian Britain’. Technology and Culture 52, no. 1: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coopey, Richard. 1991a. ‘The White Heat of Scientific Revolution’. Contemporary Record 5, no. 1: 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coopey, Richard. 1991b. ‘Ministry of Technology 1964–70’. Contemporary Record 5, no. 1: 128–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coopey, Richard. 1993. ‘Restructuring Civil and Military Science and Technology: The Ministry of Technology in the 1960s’. In Coopey, Richard, Uttley, Matthew, and Spinardi, Graham (eds.), Defence Science and Technology Adjusting to Change. Reading: Harwood Academic, 65–84.Google Scholar

Cornish, Caroline. 2013. ‘Curating Science in an Age of Empire: Kew’s Museum of Economic Botany’. PhD thesis, Royal Holloway College.Google Scholar

Costa, Ettore. 2020. ‘Whoever Launches the Biggest Sputnik Has Solved the Problems of Society? Technology and Futurism for Western European Social Democrats and Communists in the 1950s’. History of European Ideas 46, no. 1: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottrell, Alan. 1980. ‘Science Policy in Britain’. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 52: 179–91.Google Scholar

Cottrell, Alan. 1992. ‘Sunlight and Shadow in Applied Science’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 17: 120–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottrell, Alan. 1993. ‘Foreword’. In S. T. Keith, The Fundamental Nucleus: A Study of the Impact of the British Atomic Energy Project on Basic Research. Harwell: AEA Technology, i–iii.Google Scholar

Cottrell, Alan. 1998. ‘Harwell: The First 50 Years’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 23, no. 2: 139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Council for Scientific Policy. 1966a. Report on Science Policy. Cmnd 3007. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Council for Scientific Policy. 1966b. Enquiry into the Flow of Candidates in Science and Technology into Higher Education, Interim Report. Cmnd 2893. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Council for Scientific Policy. 1967. Second Report on Science Policy. Cmnd 3420. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Council for Scientific Policy. 1968. Enquiry into the Flow of Candidates in Science and Technology into Higher Education. Cmnd 3541. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Council for Scientific Policy. 1972. Third Report of the Council for Scientific Policy. Cmnd 5117. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Counsel, Robert E. 1987. ‘The National Development Council of Wales and Monmouthshire 1932–55’. MA thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar

Crabu, Stefano. 2018. ‘Rethinking Biomedicine in the Age of Translational Research: Organisational, Professional, and Epistemic Encounters’. Sociology Compass 12, no. 10: doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crafts, Nicholas, and Fearon, Peter. 2013. The Great Depression of the 1930s: Lessons for Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cramer, August. 1908. ‘Ansprache des Prorektors der Universität’. In Zum Zehnjährigen Bestehen der Göttinger Vereinigung für Angewandte Physik und Mathematik. Wiesbaden: Vieweg und Teubner, 21–24.Google Scholar

Crane, E. J. 1944. ‘Growth of the Chemical Literature: Contributions of Certain Nations and the Effects of War’. Chemical and Engineering News 22, no. 17: 1478–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, Charles. 1923–25. ‘Fact and Phantasy in Industrial Science’. Notices of the Proceedings at the Meetings of the Members of the Royal Institution 24: 1–5.Google Scholar

Crossley, R. 2011. ‘The First Wellsians: A Modern Utopia and Its Early Disciples’. English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 54, no. 4: 444–69.Google Scholar

Crouch, Tom D. 2002. A Dream of Wings: Americans and the Airplane, 1875–1905. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Crowther, J. G. 1959. Six Great Engineers: De Lesseps, Brunel, Westinghouse, Parsons, Diesel, Hinton. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar

Crowther, J. G. 1965. Statesmen of Science. London: Cresset Press.Google Scholar

Crowther, J. G., and Whiddington, Richard. 1947. Science at War. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Cullen, Clara. 2009. ‘The Museum of Irish Industry, Robert Kane and Education for All in the Dublin of the 1850s and 1860s’. History of Education 38, no. 1: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daglish, Neil. 1998. ‘“Over by Christmas”: The First World War, Education Reform and the Economy. The Case of Christopher Addison and the Origins of the DSIR’. History of Education 27, no. 3: 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, Mario, and Krige, John. 2018. ‘Beyond the Reach of Regulation? “Basic” and “Applied” Research in the Early Cold War United States’. Technology and Culture 59, no. 2: 226–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davies, S. M. 2017. ‘Organisation and Policy for Research and Development: The Health Department for England and Wales 1961 to 1986’. PhD thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar

Davies, S. M. 2021. ‘Priorities in Medical Research: Elite Dynamics in a Pivotal Episode for British Health Research’. British Journal for the History of Science 54, no. 2: 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, George Edward. 1904. A Handbook of Chemical Engineering: Illustrated with Working Examples and Numerous Drawings from Actual Installations. Manchester: Davis Bros.Google Scholar

Davis, Martin. 1990. ‘Technology, Institutions and Status: Technological Education, Debate and Policy, 1944–1956’. In Summerfield, Penny and Evans, Eric J. (eds.), Technical Education and the State since 1850: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 120–44.Google Scholar

De Clerq, Peter. 2002–3. ‘The Special Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus, South Kensington, 1876’. Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society, 72: 14–19; 73: 8–16; 73: 16–19; 76: 10–15.Google Scholar

De Vries, Marc. 2005. 80 Years of Research at the Philips Natuurkundig Laboratorium (1914–1994): The Role of the Nat. Lab. at Philips. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Wit, Dirk. 1994. The Shaping of Automation: A Historical Analysis of the Interaction between Technology and Organization, 1950–1985. Hilversum: Uitgeverij Verloren.Google Scholar

Degrois, Denise. 1991. ‘S. T. Coleridge et l’Encyclopaedia Metropolitana: impératifs pratiques et conflits idéologiques’. In Becq, Annie (ed.), L’encyclopédisme: actes du colloque de Caen, 12–16 janvier 1987. Paris: Aux amateurs de livres, 431–35.Google Scholar

DeJager, Timothy. 1993. ‘Pure Science and Practical Interests: The Origins of the Agricultural Research Council, 1930–1937’. Minerva 31, no. 2: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demant, V. A. 1932. This Unemployment: Disaster or Opportunity? London: Student Christian Movement Press.Google Scholar

Denton, Peter H. 2001. The ABC of Armageddon: Bertrand Russell on Science, Religion, and the Next War, 1919–1938. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2021. ‘UK to Launch New Research Agency to Support High Risk, High Reward Science’. Press release. Available at www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-launch-new-research-agency-to-support-high-risk-high-reward-science (accessed August 2022).Google Scholar

Department of Health. Research and Development Directorate. 2006. Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar

Department of Overseas Trade. 1938. Guide to the Pavilion of His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom. Empire Exhibition, Scotland, 1938. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Department of Science and Art. 1857. Fourth Report of the Department of Science and Art. [2240]. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Department of Science and Art. 1857a. Prospectus of the Metropolitan School of Science Applied to Mining and the Arts: 3d session, 1857–58. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Department of Science and Art. 1899. Department of Science and Art: Forty-Sixth Report. c. 9191. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Dewey, Clive. 2007. The Passing of Barchester. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Dickens, Elizabeth. 2011. ‘“Permanent Books”: The Reviewing and Advertising of Books in the Nation and Athenaeum’. The Journal of Modern Periodical Studies 2, no. 2: 165–84.Google Scholar

Diebold, John. 1952 Automation: The Advent of the Automatic Factory. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Dietz, Burkhard, Fessner, Michael, and Maier, Helmut (eds.). 1996. Technische Intelligenz und ‘Kulturfactor Technik’. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Divall, Colin. 1990. ‘A Measure of Agreement: Employers and Engineering Studies in the Universities of England and Wales, 1897–1939’. Social Studies of Science 20, no. 1: 65–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Divall, Colin. 2006. ‘Technological Networks and Industrial Research in Britain: The London, Midland & Scottish Railway, 1926–47’. Business History 48, no. 1: 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Divall, Colin, and Johnston, Sean F.. 2000. Scaling Up: The Institution of Chemical Engineers and the Rise of a New Profession. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, Frank R. 1993. ‘The Social Construction of the Great Depression: Industrial Policy during the 1930s in the United States, Britain, and France’. Theory and Society 22, no. 1: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, Frank R. 1994. Forging Industrial Policy: the United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodgson, Mark. 1990. ‘The Shock of the New: The Formation of Celltech and the British Technology Transfer System’. Industry and Higher Education 4, no. 2: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donaldson, Kirstin L. 2014. ‘Experiment: A Manifesto of Young England, 1928–1931’. PhD thesis, University of York.Google Scholar

Donnelly, James. 1986. ‘Representations of Applied Science: Academics and Chemical Industry in Late Nineteenth-Century England’. Social Studies of Science 16, no. 2: 195–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, James. 1987. ‘Chemical Education and the Chemical Industry in England from the Mid-Nineteenth to the Early Twentieth Century’. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 1987.Google Scholar

Donnelly, James. 1989. ‘The Origins of the Technical Curriculum in England during the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries’. Studies in Science Education 16, no. 1: 123–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, James. 1997. ‘Getting Technical: The Vicissitudes of Academic Industrial Chemistry in Nineteenth-Century Britain’. History of Education 26, no. 2: 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Dr. Henry Taylor Bovey, F.R.S.’ 1912. Nature 88, no. 2207: 520–21.Google Scholar

Drayton, Richard Harry. 2000. Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the ‘Improvement’ of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Drummond, Diane. 2020. ‘Pure and Applied Science in the New University 1900–1914’. In Mussell, James and Gooday, Graeme (eds.), A Pioneer of Connection: Recovering the Life and Work of Oliver Lodge. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 431–35.Google Scholar

Drummond, Ian M. 1971. ‘More on British Colonial Aid Policy in the Nineteen-Thirties’. Canadian Journal of History 6, no. 2: 189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[DSIR]. 1916. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1915–16. Cd 8336. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1917a. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1916–17. Cd 8718. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1917b. Report of the Fuel Research Board on Their Scheme of Research and on the Establishment of a Fuel Research Station. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1919. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1918–19. Cmd 320. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1920. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1919–20. Cmd 905. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1921. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1920–21. Cmd 1491. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1922. First Report of the Adhesives Research Committee. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1923. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1922–23. Cmd 1937. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1924. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1923–24. Cmd 2223. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1925. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1924-25. Cmd 2491. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

[DSIR]. 1927. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1925–26. Cmd 2782. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR. 1927. Co-operative Industrial Research: An Account of the Work of Research Associations under the Government Scheme. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR. 1929. Report for the Year, 1928–29. Cmd 3471. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar

DSIR. 1931. Report for the Year, 1929–30. Cmd 3789. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar

DSIR. 1932. Report for the Year, 1931–32. Cmd 4254. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR. 1933. Report for the Year, 1932–33. Cmd 4483. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR. 1935. Report for the Year, 1934–35. Cmd 5013. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR. 1937. Report for the Year, 1935–36. Cmd 5350. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR. 1937. Report for the Year, 1936–37. Cmd 5647. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR. 1938. Report for the Year, 1937–38. Cmd 5927. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

DSIR Economics Committee. 1958. Estimates of Resources Devoted to Scientific and Engineering Research and Development in British Manufacturing Industry, 1955. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Dudley, Fred A. 1942. ‘Matthew Arnold and Science’. PMLA 57, no. 1: 275–94.Google Scholar

Dunbabin, John P. D. 1975. ‘British Rearmament in the 1930s: A Chronology and Review’. The Historical Journal 18, no. 3: 587–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, Robert Kennedy. 1907. The Chemistry of Commerce: A Simple Interpretation of Some New Chemistry in Its Relation to Modern Industry. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Eaglesham, E. J. 1963. ‘The Centenary of Sir Robert Morant’. British Journal of Educational Studies 12, no. 1: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ede, Andrew. 2002. ‘The Natural Defense of a Scientific People: The Public Debate over Chemical Warfare in Post-WWI America’. Bulletin for the History of Chemistry 27. no. 2: 128–35.Google Scholar

Edge, David. 1995. ‘Reinventing the Wheel’. In Jasanoff, Sheila, Markle, Gerald, Petersen, James, and Pinch, Trevor (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 3–23.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David. 1996. ‘The “White Heat” Revisited: The British Government and Technology in the 1960s’. Twentieth Century British History 7, no. 1: 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edgerton, David. 1997. ‘The Decline of Declinism’. Business History Review 71, no. 2: 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edgerton, David. 2004. ‘“The Linear Model” Did Not Exist: Reflections on the History and Historiography of Science and Research in Industry in the Twentieth Century’. In Grandin, Karl, Wormbs, Nina, and Widmalm, Sven (eds.), The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. New York: Watson, 31–57.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David. 2006. Warfare State: Britain, 1920–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David. 2009. The “Haldane Principle” and Other Invented Traditions in Science Policy’. History and Policy. www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-haldane-principle-and-other-invented-traditions-in-science-policy (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Edgerton, David. 2011. Britain’s War Machine: Weapons, Resources, and Experts in the Second World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David. 2018. The Rise and Fall of the British Nation: A Twentieth-Century History. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David, and Horrocks, Sally. 1994. ‘British Industrial Research and Development before 1945’. Economic History Review 47, no. 2: 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Pamela. 2012. ‘Coleridge on Politics and Religion: The Statesman’s Manual, Aids to Reflection, On the Constitution of Church and State’. In Burwick, Frederick (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 236–53.Google Scholar

Elliot, Walter. 1931. ‘The World of the Empire Marketing Board’. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 79, no. 4101: 736–48.Google Scholar

Empire Exhibition, Scotland. 1938. Empire Exhibition: Official Guide. Glasgow: Empire Exhibition.Google Scholar

English, Richard, and Kenny, Michael. 1999. ‘British Decline or the Politics of Declinism?’ The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 1, no. 2: 252–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English, Richard, and Kenny, Michael. 2000. Rethinking British Decline. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

English, Richard, and Kenny, Michael. 2001. ‘Public Intellectuals and the Question of British Decline’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 3, no. 3: 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Equal to Six Trafalgar Squares: The Palace of Engineering’. 1924. Illustrated London News, 24 May: 18.Google Scholar

Eschenburg, Johann Joachim. 1792. Lehrbuch der Wissenschaftskunde: Ein Grundriss Encyclopaedischer Vorlesung. Berlin: Friedrich Nicolai.Google Scholar

Ewing, Alfred. 1932. ‘An Engineer’s Outlook’. Supplement to Nature, no. 3279: 341–50.Google Scholar

Fabian Society. 1923. Is Civilisation Decaying? A Course of Six Lectures to Be Given at King’s Hall, King St., Covent Garden, on Tuesdays at 8.30 p.m., Beginning 16th October, 1923. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar

Falby, Alison. 2008. Between the Pigeonholes: Gerald Heard, 1889–1971. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Farrall, Lyndsey Andrew. 2019. ‘The Origins and Growth of the English Eugenics Movement, 1865–1925’. PhD thesis, University of Indiana (1969). Reissued by University College London, Department of Science and Technology Studies, as STS Occasional Paper, no. 9: www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/sts-research/sts-occasional-papers-series (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Farrar, W. V. 1972. ‘The Society for the Promotion of Scientific Industry 1872–1876’. Annals of Science 29, no. 1: 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favretto, Ilaria. 2000. ‘“Wilsonism” Reconsidered: Labour Party Revisionism 1952–64’. Contemporary British History 14, no. 4: 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Federation of British Industries (FBI). 1947. Scientific and Technical Research in British Industry: A Statistical Survey. London: FBI.Google Scholar

Fine, Gary Alan. 1995. ‘Public Narration and Group Culture: Discerning Discourse in Social Movements’. In Johnston, Hank and Klandermans, Bert (eds.), Social Movements and Culture. 127–43. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, David. 2006. Print Culture and the Blackwood Tradition, 1805–1930. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finlay, Mark R. 1991. ‘The Rehabilitation of an Agricultural Chemist: Justus von Liebig and the Seventh Edition’. Ambix 38, no. 3: 155–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finney, Patrick. 2000. ‘The Romance of Decline: The Historiography of Appeasement and British National Identity’. Electronic Journal of International History 1: ISSN 1471-1443.Google Scholar

‘The Five Best Brains’. 1930. The Spectator, no. 5320 (14 June): 19.Google Scholar

Fleming, A. P. M. 1930. ‘The Profession of Engineering. Promising Fields in the Future’. Journal of Careers 9, no. 100: 9–14.Google Scholar

Fleming, A. P. M. 1932. ‘The Development of Invention: Bridging the Gap between the Birth of an Idea and its Industrial Application’. In Mackay, R. J. (ed.), Business and Science: Being Collected Papers Read to the Department of Industrial Co-operation at the Centenary Meeting of the British Association … 1931. London: British Association for the Advancement of Science, Department of Industrial Cooperation, 245–50.Google Scholar

Fleming, A. P. M. 1933. ‘Research and Industrial Development. Is a New Organisation Required?’ State Service 13: 31–32.Google Scholar

Fleming, A. P. M., and Brockelhurst, H. J.. 1925. A History of Engineering. London: Black.Google Scholar

Flink, Tim, and Kaldewey, David. 2018. ‘The Language of Science Policy in the Twenty-First Century: What Comes after Basic and Applied Research?’ In Kaldewey, David and Schauz, Désirée (eds.), Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Berghahn, 251–84.Google Scholar

Floud, Roderick, and Glynn, Sean (eds.). 2000. London Higher: The Establishment of Higher Education in London. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar

Foden, Frank. 1951. ‘The National Certificate’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 3, no. 6: 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foden, Frank. 1961. ‘A History of Technical Examinations in England to 1918 with Special Reference to the Examination Work of the City and Guilds of London Institute’. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar

Foden, Frank. 1970. Philip Magnus: Victorian Educational Pioneer. London: Vallentine & Mitchell.Google Scholar

Fontanon, Claudine, et al. (eds.). 1994. Les professeurs du Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers: dictionnaire biographique, 1794–1955. Paris: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique and Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers.Google Scholar

Foreman-Peck, James, and Hannah, Leslie. 1999. ‘Britain: From Economic Liberalism to Socialism – And Back?’ In Foreman-Peck, James and Federico, Giovanni (eds.), European Industrial Policy: The Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 18–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Foreword’. 1934. Annals of Eugenics 6, no. 1: 1.Google Scholar

Forgan, Sophie. 2003. ‘Atoms in Wonderland: The Presentation of Atomic Science in Britain in Museums, Exhibitions and Print, 1945–1960’. History and Technology 19, no. 3: 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forman, Paul. 2007. ‘The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology’. History and Technology 23, nos. 1–2: 1–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forman, Paul, Heilbron, John L., and Weart, Spencer. 1975. ‘Physics circa 1900: Personnel, Funding and Productivity of the Academic Establishments’. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fort, Daniel G., et al. 2017. ‘Mapping the Evolving Definitions of Translational Research’. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 1, no. 1: 60–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fox, Robert. 1974. ‘Education for a New Age: The Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers, 1815–30’. In Cardwell, D. S. L. (ed.), Artisan to Graduate: Essays to Commemorate the Foundation in 1824 of the Manchester Mechanics’ Institution, Now in 1974 the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 25–38.Google Scholar

Francis, R. Douglas. 2009. The Technological Imperative in Canada: An Intellectual History. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael. 1979. ‘Eugenics and Progressive Thought: A Study in Ideological Affinity’. The Historical Journal 22, no. 3: 645–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Freeden, Michael. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, Christopher, and Soete, Luc. 2009. ‘Developing Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: What We Can Learn from the Past’. Research Policy 38, no. 4: 583–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedmann, Georges. 1936. La crise du progrès: esquisse d’histoire des idées, 1895–1935. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Friday, James. 1974. ‘The Braggs and Broadcasting’. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 47: 59–85.Google Scholar

Fry, R. H. 1956. ‘The Breaking of the Crust’. Manchester Guardian Survey of Industry, Trade and Finance (March): 44–58.Google Scholar

‘Fuel Research in Great Britain’. 1936. Nature 137, no. 3477: 1020–21.Google Scholar

Galison, Peter. 2004. ‘Removing Knowledge’. Critical Inquiry 31, no. 1: 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galison, Peter. 2010. ‘Secrecy in Three Acts’. Social Research 77, no. 3: 941–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, Catherine. 2009. The Body Economic: Life, Death, and Sensation in Political Economy and the Victorian Novel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W. B. 1955. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 56: 167–98.Google Scholar

Galsworthy, John. 1923. International Thought. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar

Galton, Francis. 1909. Essays in Eugenics. London: Eugenics Education Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gambles, Anna. 1998. ‘Rethinking the Politics of Protection: Conservatism and the Corn Laws, 1830–52’. English Historical Review, 113, no. 453: 928–52.Google Scholar

Garfield, Simon. 2022. All the Knowledge in the World: The Extraordinary History of the Encyclopaedia. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar

Gay, Hannah. 2000. ‘Association and Practice: The City and Guilds of London Institute for the Advancement of Technical Education’. Annals of Science 57, no. 4: 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gay, Hannah. 2007. The History of Imperial College London 1907–2007: Higher Education and Research in Science, Technology and Medicine. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘George Gore F.R.S.’ 1909. The Electrician 63: 467.Google Scholar

Georges, R. A. 1969. ‘Toward an Understanding of Storytelling Events’. Journal of American Folklore 82, no. 326: 313–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georges, R. A. 1994. ‘The Concept of “Repertoire” in Folkloristics’. Western Folklore 53, no. 4: 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georghiou, Luke, Metcalfe, J. Stanley, Gibbons, Michael, Ray, Tim, and Evans, Janet. 1986. ‘Wealth from Knowledge Revisited’. In Georghiou, Luke, Evans, Janet, Ray, Tim, Metcalfe, J. Stanley, and Gibbons, Michael (eds.), Post–Innovation Performance Technological Development and Competition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gere, Cathy. 2009. Knossos and the Prophets of Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbons, Michael. 1970. ‘The CERN 300 GeV Accelerator: A Case Study in the Application of the Weinberg Criteria’. Minerva 8, no. 1: 180–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbons, Michael, and Johnston, Ron. 1974. ‘The Roles of Science in Technological Innovation’. Research Policy 3, no. 3: 220–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbons, Michael, Limoges, Camille, Nowotny, Helga, Schwartzman, Simon, Scott, Peter, and Trow, Martin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Giffard, Hermione. 2020. ‘Engine of Innovation: The Royal Aircraft Establishment, State Design and the Coming of the Gas Turbine Aero-Engine in Britain’. Contemporary British History 34, no. 2: 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Girard, Marion. 2008. A Strange and Formidable Weapon: British Responses to World War I Poison Gas. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gispen, Kees. 1989. New Profession, Old Order: Engineers and German Society, 1815–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Glazebrook, Richard. 1905. ‘Science and Industry’. Times Engineering Supplement 1, no. 31 (27 September): 245–46.Google Scholar

Glazebrook, Richard. 1917. Science and Industry, the Place of Cambridge in Any Scheme for Their Combination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glazebrook, Richard. 1918. ‘The National Industrial Research Laboratory’. Engineering 105 (8 March): 252–56.Google Scholar

Glazebrook, Richard. 1933. ‘Early Days at the National Physical Laboratory’. Lecture delivered March 23, 1933. London: National Physical Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit. 2003. ‘Measuring Science: Is There “Basic Research” without Statistics?’ Social Science Information 42, no. 1: 57–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit. 2006. ‘The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework’. Science Technology and Human Values 31, no. 6: 639–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit. 2007. ‘Science, Accounting and Statistics: The Input-Output Framework’. Research Policy 36, no. 9: 1388–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit. 2008. ‘In the Shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the Study of Technological Innovation’. Minerva 46, no. 3: 343–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit. 2015. Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation over the Centuries. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit. 2017. Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit. 2019. The Invention of Technological Innovation: Languages, Discourses and Ideology in Historical Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit, and Lane, Joseph P.. 2013. ‘Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)Tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation’. Science, Technology, & Human Values 38, no. 5: 621–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godin, Benoit, and Schauz, Désirée. 2016. ‘The Changing Identity of Research: A Cultural and Conceptual History’. History of Science 54, no. 3: 276–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golinski, Jan. 1983. ‘Peter Shaw: Chemistry and Communication in Augustan England’. Ambix 30, no. 1: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golinski, Jan. 1992. Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gollin, Alfred M. 1981. ‘England Is No Longer an Island: The Phantom Airship Scare of 1909’. Albion 13, no. 1: 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gooday, Graeme. 2000. ‘Lies, Damned Lies and Declinism: Lyon Playfair, the Paris 1867 Exhibition and the Contested Rhetorics of Scientific Education and Industrial Performance’. In Inkster, I. (ed.), The Golden Age: Essays in British Social and Economic History 1850–1870. Aldershot: Ashgate, 105–20.Google Scholar

Gooday, Graeme. 2012. ‘“Vague and Artificial”: The Historically Elusive Distinction between Pure and Applied Science’. Isis 103, no. 3: 546–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodeve, Charles. 1972. ‘Frank Edward Smith’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 18: 532–33.Google Scholar

Gordon, W. R. 1934. ‘The Utilisation of Coal’. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 82, no. 4255: 756–80.Google Scholar

Gosden, P. H. J. H., and Taylor, A. J. (eds.). 1975. Studies in the History of a University, 1874–1974. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar

Gowing, Margaret Mary. 1990. ‘Lord Hinton of Bankside, O.M., F. Eng. 12 May 1901–22 June 1983’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 36: 218–39.Google Scholar

Gowing, Margaret Mary, and Arnold, Lorna. 1974. Independence and Deterrence. Britain and Atomic Energy 1945–1952, vol. 2: Policy Execution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Grant, Alexander. 1884. The Story of the University of Edinburgh during Its First Three Hundred Years. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar

Greg, Henry P. 1916. ‘The Lancashire Sections. Research in the Cotton Trade’. Journal of the Textile Institute 7, no. 3: 244–49.Google Scholar

Gregory, Richard. 1916. Discovery, or The Spirit and Service of Science. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘The Grell Mystery’. 1913. The Spectator, no. 4444 (30 August): 22–23.Google Scholar

Grelon, André. 2000. ‘Du bon usage du modèle étranger: la mise en place de l’École centrale des arts et manufactures’. Bulletin de la Sabix 26: 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greysmith, D. 1990. ‘The Empire as Infinite Resource: The Work of P. L. Simmonds (1814–1897)’. Journal of Newspaper and Periodical History 6, no. 1: 3–15.Google Scholar

Grove, Jack William. 1962. Government and Industry in Britain. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Guagnini, Anna. 2010. ‘The Fashioning of Higher Technical Education in Britain: The Case of Manchester, 1851–1914’. In Gospel, Howard F. (ed.), Industrial Training and Technological Innovation. London: Routledge, 65–83.Google Scholar

Guise, George. 2014. ‘Margaret Thatcher’s Influence on British Science’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 68, no. 3: 301–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gummett, Philip. 1971. ‘British Science Policy and the Advisory Council on Scientific Policy’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Gummett, Philip. 1980. Scientists in Whitehall. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Gummett, Philip, and Gibbons, Michael. 1978. ‘Redeployment and Diversification at Harwell’. Omega 6, no. 1: 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gummett, Philip, and Price, Geoffrey. 1977. ‘An Approach to the Central Planning of British Science: The Formation of the Advisory Council on Scientific Policy’. Minerva 15, no. 2: 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gummett, Philip, and Williams, Roger. 1972. ‘Assessing the Council for Scientific Policy’. Nature 240, no. 5380: 329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunther, R. T. 1925. Historic Instruments for the Advancement of Science: A Handbook to the Oxford Collections Prepared for the Opening of the Lewis Evans Collection of May 5, 1925. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar

Gusewelle, J. K. 1977. ‘Science and the Admiralty during World War I: The Case of the BIR’. In Jordan, Gerald (ed.), Naval Warfare in the Twentieth Century, 1900–1945: Essays in Honour of Arthur Marder. London: Taylor & Francis, 103–17.Google Scholar

Hackmann, Willem Dirk. 1984. Seek and Strike: Sonar, Anti-Submarine Warfare and the Royal Navy 1914–54. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Hackmann, Willem Dirk. 1988. ‘Sonar, Wireless Telegraphy and the Royal Navy: Scientific Development in a Military Context, 1890–1939’. In Rupke, Nicholaas A. (ed.), Science, Politics and the Public Good: Essays in Honour of Margaret Gowing. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haigh, Alice. 2021. ‘“To Strive, to Seek, to Find”: The Origins and Establishment of the British Post Office Engineering Research Station at Dollis Hill, 1908–1938’. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S. 1929. ‘The Place of Science in Western Civilisation’. The Realist 2, no. 2: 49–164.Google Scholar

Hamilton, C. I. 2014. ‘Three Cultures at the Admiralty, c. 1800–1945: Naval Staff, the Secretariat and the Arrival of Scientists’. Journal for Maritime Research 16, no. 1: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hance, Nicholas John. 2006. Harwell: The Enigma Revealed. Buckland: Enhance Publishing.Google Scholar

Hansard HC Deb. 24 March 1868. Vol. 191, cols. 160–65. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1868/mar/24/motion-for-a-select-committee (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard HC Deb. 29 April 1909. Vol. 4, cols. 473–619. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1909/apr/29/revenue-and-expenditure-for-1909-10 (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard HC Deb. 2 August 1909. Vol. 8, cols. 1564–617. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1909/aug/02/naval-and-military-aeronautics (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard HC Deb. 27 July 1925. Vol. 187, cols. 49–50W. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1925/jul/27/scientific-research (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard HC Deb. 25 May 1938, Vol. 336, cols. 1233–348. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1938/may/25/air-defences (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard HC Deb. 30 November 1945, Vol. 416, cols. 1846–47. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1945/nov/30/scientific-manpower-and-resources (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard HC Deb. 21 July 1969. Vol. 787, cols. 1237–368. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1969/jul/21/civil-science (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard. HL Deb. 11 November 1852. Vol. 123, cols. 17–21. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1852/nov/11/the-queens-speech (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hansard. HL Deb. 15 November 1961. Vol. 235, cols. 648–728. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1961/nov/15/technical-and-scientific-manpower-and (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

Hård, Mikael. 1998. ‘German Regulation: The Integration of Modern Technology into National Culture’. In Hård, Mikael and Jamison, Andrew (eds.), The Intellectual Appropriation of Technology: Discourses on Modernity 1900–1939. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 39–67.Google Scholar

Hartcup, Guy, and Allibone, T. E.. 1984. Cockcroft and the Atom. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar

Hartley, Harold. 1937. ‘Agriculture as a Source of Raw Materials for Industry’. Journal of the Textile Institute 28: 151–72.Google Scholar

Harvey, Mark, and McMeekin, Andrew. 2007. Public or Private Economies of Knowledge? Turbulence in the Biological Sciences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harvey, Mark, and McMeekin, Andrew. 2010. ‘Public or Private Economies of Knowledge: The Economics of Diffusion and Appropriation of Bioinformatics Tools’. International Journal of the Commons 4, no. 1: 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harwood, Jonathan. 2005. Technology’s Dilemma Agricultural Colleges between Science and Practice in Germany, 1860–1934. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Harwood, Jonathan. 2006. ‘Engineering Education between Science and Practice: Rethinking the Historiography’. History and Technology 22, no. 1: 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harwood, Jonathan. 2010. ‘Understanding Academic Drift: On the Institutional Dynamics of Higher Technical and Professional Education’. Minerva 48, no. 4: 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashimoto, Takehiko. 2000. ‘The Wind Tunnel and the Emergence of Aeronautical Research in Britain’. In Galison, Peter and Roland, Alex (eds.), Atmospheric Flight in the Twentieth Century. Dordrecht: Springer, 223–39.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, Takehiko. 2007. ‘Leonard Bairstow as a Scientific Middleman: Early Aerodynamic Research on Airplane Stability in Britain, 1909–1920’. Historia Scientiarum. 2nd Series 17, no. 2: 103–20.Google Scholar

Hastings, Adrian. 2001. A History of English Christianity, 1920–2000. 4th ed. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Sarah. 2015. ‘Industrial Automation and Stress, c. 1945–79’. In Jackson, Mark (ed.), Stress in Post-War Britain, 1945–1985. London: Routledge, 75–93.Google Scholar

Haynes, Roslynn. 1980. H. G. Wells, Discoverer of the Future: The Influence of Science on His Thought. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heard, Gerald. 1931. ‘This Surprising World’. The Listener 6, no. 137 (26 August): 340.Google Scholar

Heard, Gerald. 1935. Science in the Making. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Hearnshaw, F. C. 1929. Centenary History of King’s College London 1828–1928. London: G. G. Harrap.Google Scholar

Hempstead, Colin, and Cookson, Gillian. 2000. A Victorian Scientist and Engineer: Fleeming Jenkin and the Birth of Electrical Engineering. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Hendry, John. 1991. ‘Technological Decision Making in Its Organizational Context: Nuclear Power Reactor Development in Britain’. Cambridge University Engineering Department, Research Paper 4/91.Google Scholar

Hennessy, Peter. 2018. ‘Searching for the Holy Grail of a Science and Innovation Strategy That Makes a Difference’. FST Journal 22, no. 2: 7–9.Google Scholar

Hennock, E. P. 1990. ‘Technological Education in England, 1850–1926: The Uses of a German Model’. History of Education 19, no. 4: 299–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hensley, Oliver D. (ed.). 1988. The Classification of Research. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar

Herklots, Hugh. 1928. The New Universities: An External Examination. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar

Hill-Andrews, Oliver. 2015. ‘Interpreting Science: J. G. Crowther and the Making of Interwar British Culture’. PhD thesis, University of Sussex.Google Scholar

Hinton, Christopher. 1953. ‘Atomic Energy Developments in Great Britain’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 9, no. 10: 366–68, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, James. 2013. The Mass Observers: A History, 1937–1949. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

HM Treasury. 1930. Report of the Committee on the Staffs of Government Scientific Establishments. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Hodge, Joseph Morgan. 2007. Triumph of the Expert: Agrarian Doctrines of Development and the Legacies of British Colonialism. Athens: Ohio University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodge, Joseph Morgan. 2011. ‘Science and Empire: An Overview of the Historical Scholarship’. In Bennett, B. M. and Hodge, J. M. (eds.), Science and Empire: Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire, 1800–1970. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogben, Lancelot. 1935. Mathematics for the Million. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Hogben, Lancelot. 1938. Science for the Citizen. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Hollinger, David. 1995. ‘Science as a Weapon in Kulturkämpfe in the United States during and after World War II’. Isis 86, no. 3: 440–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmfeld, John D. 1970 ‘From Amateurs to Professionals in American Science: The Controversy over the Proceedings of an 1853 Scientific Meeting’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 114, no. 1: 22–36.Google ScholarPubMed

Homburg, Ernst. 1986. ‘De “Tweede Industriële Revolutie”: Een Problematisch Historisch Concept’. Theoretische Geschiedenis 13, no. 3: 367–85.Google Scholar

Horn, C. A., and Horn, P. L. R.. 1984. ‘The City of London Guilds and Technical Education in Victorian England’. Journal of Further and Higher Education 8, no. 1: 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horner, David. 1993. ‘The Road to Scarborough: Wilson, Labour and the Scientific Revolution’. In Coopey, Richard, Fielding, Richard, and Tiratsoo, Nick (eds.), The Wilson Governments. London: Pinter, 48–71.Google Scholar

Horrocks, Sally M. 1993. ‘Consuming Science: Science, Technology and Food in Britain, 1870–1939’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Horrocks, Sally M. 2000. ‘A Promising Pioneer Profession? Women in Industrial Chemistry in Inter-War Britain’. British Journal for the History of Science 33, no. 3: 351–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hottois, Gilbert. 2018. ‘Technoscience: From the Origin of the Word to Its Current Uses’. In Loeve, Sacha, Guchet, Xavier, and Vincent, Bernadette Bensaude (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Cham: Springer, 121–38.Google Scholar

Houghton, Esther Rhoads. 1979. ‘A “New” Editor of the “British Critic”’. Victorian Periodicals Review 12, no. 3: 102–5.Google Scholar

Hounshell, David A. 1980. ‘Edison and the Pure Science Ideal in 19th-Century America’. Science n.s. 207, no. 4431: 612–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hounshell, David A. 2000. ‘Automation, Transfer Machinery, and Mass Production in the U.S. Automobile Industry in the Post–World War II Era’. Enterprise & Society 1, no. 1: 100–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

House of Commons Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee. 2008–9. Minutes of Evidence. Office for Strategic Coordination of Health Research, HC 655–I. Available at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmdius/655i/9060801.htm (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar

House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 1988. Priorities in Medical Research. HL 54-1. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar

Hughes, Helen. 2021. ‘Film and the British Atomic Project’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 42, no. 2: 219–43.Google Scholar

Hughes, Henry Stuart. 1967. Consciousness and Society. London: MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar

Hughes, Jeff. 1998. ‘Plasticine and Valves: Industry, Instrumentation and the Emergence of Nuclear Physics’. In Gaudillière, Jean-Paul and Löwy, Ilana (eds.), The Invisible Industrialist: Manufacturers and the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 58–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Jeff. 2016. ‘Unity through Experiment? Reductionism, Rhetoric and the Politics of Nuclear Science, 1918–40’. In Kamminga, Harmke and Sommsen, Geert (eds.), Pursuing the Unity of Science: Ideology and Scientific Practice from the Great War to the Cold War. London: Routledge, 50–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Jeff. 2018. ‘A Portrait of the Scientist as a Young Ham: Wireless, Modernity and Nuclear Physics’. In Bud, Robert, Greenhalgh, Paul, James, Frank, and Shiach, Morag (eds.), Being Modern: The Cultural Impact of Science in the Early Twentieth Century. London: UCL Press, 245–73.Google Scholar

Hull, Andrew J. 1994. ‘Passwords to Power: A Public Rationale for Expert Influence on Central Government Policy-Making: British Scientists and Economists c. 1900–c. 1925’. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Hull, Andrew J. 1999. ‘War of Words: The Public Science of the British Scientific Community and the Origins of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1914–16’. British Journal for the History of Science 32, no. 4: 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, L. J. 1958. ‘The Origins of the Haldane Report’. Australian Journal of Public Administration 17, no. 4: 344–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Bruce J. 1983. ‘“Practice vs. Theory”: The British Electrical Debate, 1888–1891’. Isis 74, no. 3: 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Bruce J. 2005. The Maxwellians. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Eric. 1969. ‘Scientists and Civil Servants: The Struggle over the National Physical Laboratory in 1918’. Minerva 7, no. 3: 373–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, Eric. 1972. ‘A Fruitful Cooperation between Government and Academic Science: Food Research in the United Kingdom’. Minerva 10, no. 1: 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, Eric. 1975. ‘The Origins of the University Grants Committee’. Minerva 13, no. 4: 583–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huxley, Aldous. 1931. ‘Sight-Seeing-in-Alien-Englands’. Nash’s Pall Mall Magazine, June: 50–53, 118.Google Scholar

Huxley, Aldous. 1932a. Brave New World. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar

Huxley, Aldous. 1932b ‘Science: The Double-Edged Tool’. The Listener 7, no. 158 (20 January): 77–79 and 112.Google Scholar

Huxley, Julian (ed.). 1934. Scientific Research and Social Needs. London: Watts.Google Scholar

Huxley, Julian 1936. ‘Science and Its Relation to Social Needs’. In Scientific Progress. London: George Allen & Unwin, 175–210.Google Scholar

Illinois Institute of Technology. 1968. Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology, Research Institute.Google Scholar

Ince, Martin. 1986. The Politics of British Science. Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Inge, William Ralph. 1930. Christian Ethics and Modern Problems. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar

Inkster, Ian. 1991. Science and Technology in History: An Approach to Industrial Development. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innes, Hammond. 1939. All Roads Lead to Friday. London: Herbert Jenkins.Google Scholar

Irwin, Will. 1921. ‘The Next War’: An Appeal to Common Sense. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar

Israel, Paul. 1992. From Machine Shop to Industrial Laboratory: Telegraphy and the Changing Context of American Invention, 1830–1920. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Ives, Eric William, Schwarz, L. D., and Drummond, Diane K.. 2000. The First Civic University: Birmingham 1880–1980: An Introductory History. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Annie. 2015. The Pentagon’s Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America’s Top Secret Research Agency. New York: Little, Brown, 2015.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. 2003. ‘A Visit to the Science and Art Museums’. First published 1932. In Buhle, Paul and Henry, Patrick (eds.), Letters from London: Seven Essays. London: Signal Books, 1–14.Google Scholar

James, F. A. J. L. 2008. ‘The Janus Face of Modernity: Michael Faraday in the Twentieth Century’. The British Journal for the History of Science 41, no. 4: 477–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. 2015. ‘Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity’. In Jasanoff, Sheila and Kim, Sang-Hyun (eds.), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkin, John G. 2011. ‘Atomic Energy Is “Moonshine”: What Did Rutherford Really Mean?’ Physics in Perspective 13, no. 2: 128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, E. W. 1973. ‘The Board of Education and the Reconstruction Committee, 1916–1918’. Journal of Educational Administration and History 5, no. 1: 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jephcott, Sir Harry. 1965. ‘The Glaxo Research Organization’. In Cockcroft, Sir John (ed.), The Organization of Scientific Establishments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–67.Google Scholar

Jevons, F. R. 1972. ‘Preface’. In J. Langrish, M. Gibbons, W. G. Evans, and F. R. Jevons, Wealth from Knowledge: Studies of Innovation in Industry. London: Macmillan, ix–xiii.Google Scholar

Jevons, F. R. 1976. ‘The Interaction of Science and Technology Today, or, Is Science the Mother of Invention?’ Technology and Culture 17, no. 4: 729–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jewkes, John. 1960. ‘How Much Science?’ The Economic Journal 70, no. 277: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jewkes, John, Sawers, David, and Stillerman, Richard. 1958. The Sources of Invention. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Johnson, Paul Barton. 1969. Land Fit for Heroes: The Planning of British Reconstruction, 1916–1919. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, J. F. W. 1847. Lectures on Agricultural Chemistry and Geology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood.Google Scholar

Jones, Allan. 2012. ‘Mary Adams and the Producer’s Role in Early BBC Science Broadcasts’. Public Understanding of Science 21, no. 8: 968–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Allan. 2020. ‘Science in the Making: 1930s Citizen Science on the BBC’. History of Education 49, no. 3: 327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Aubrey. 1985. Britain’s Economy: The Roots of Stagnation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Edgar. 1996. University College Durham: A Social History. Aberystwyth: E. Jones.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter. 2004. ‘Posting the Future: British Stamp Design and the “White Heat” of a Technological Revolution’. Journal of Design History 17, no. 2: 163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Peter M. 2008. Industrial Enlightenment: Science, Technology and Culture in Birmingham and the West Midlands, 1760–1820. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter M. 2016. Agricultural Enlightenment: Knowledge, Technology, and Nature, 1750–1840. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Richard. 2019. ‘A Resurgence of the Regions: Rebuilding Innovation Capacity across the Whole UK’. Available at www.softmachines.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ResurgenceRegionsRALJv22_5_19.pdf (accessed May 2020).Google Scholar

Jones, Richard, and Wilsdon, James. 2018. The Biomedical Bubble: Why UK Research and Innovation Needs a Greater Diversity of Priorities, Politics, Places and People. London: NESTA.Google Scholar