Conceptualising quantification before settlement: Activities and issues underlying the conception and use of measurement

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511760822.004

1 - Conceptualising quantification before settlement: Activities and issues underlying the conception and use of measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Iain Morley

Edited by

Iain Morley and

Colin Renfrew

Show author details

Iain Morley: Affiliation:
The MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
Colin Renfrew: Affiliation:
The MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter discusses a number of different aspects of measurement relevant to past societies, and the archaeological record. First, it explores some of the concepts underlying different types of measurement, the differences between them, and the implications of those differences for how measurement might be, and has been, conceived. Different types and concepts of measurement are labelled with specific terms, and the relationships between them considered. Whilst it is hoped that the concepts discussed and terms used might be useful in wider considerations of measurement, the chapter is written keeping in mind the nature and implications of the types of measurement activity that are likely to have been important in the context of hunter-gatherer subsistence, especially concepts of time, cycles and distance. In particular, this chapter seeks to highlight the fact that a great many of the activities that were carried out by past societies would have involved quantification in some form. In order to explore fully the use of measurement of the world and beyond in past societies we must explore the implications of the activities for which we do have archaeological evidence, in addition to looking for direct evidence of quantification.

The final sections of the chapter in particular relate some of these conceptualisations – especially of time and cycles of events – to supernatural and spiritual systems of belief for their explanation, and ritual systems of practice for their mediation.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Archaeology of Measurement
Comprehending Heaven, Earth and Time in Ancient Societies
, pp. 7 - 18

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760822.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barber, E. W. and Barber, P. T., 2004. When They Severed Earth from Sky: How the Human Mind Shapes Myth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Bednarik, R., 1991. Comment on F. d'Errico: Microscopic and statistical criteria for the identification of prehistoric systems of notation. Rock Art Research 8:2, 89–91.Google Scholar

Bloch, M., 1998. How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches to Cognition, Memory, and Literacy. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar

Boyer, P., 1996. What makes anthropomorphism natural: Intuitive ontology and cultural representation. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 2, 83–97.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyer, P., 2001. Religion Explained: The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. William Heinemann, London.Google Scholar

Brown, C. H., 1983. Where do cardinal direction terms come from?Anthropological Linguistics 25, 121–61.Google Scholar

D'Errico, F., 1991. Microscopic and statistical criteria for the identification of prehistoric systems of notation. Rock Art Research 8:2, 83–89; 91–93.Google Scholar

Endicott, K., 1979. Batak Negrito Religion: The World-View and Rituals of a Hunting and Gathering People of Peninsula Malaysia. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. E., 1965. Theories of Primitive Religion. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. S. and Turner, N. J., 1999. Ecological/cosmological knowledge and land management among hunter-gatherers. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, eds. Lee, R. B. and Daly, R.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 419–25.Google Scholar

Gamble, C., 1999. The Palaeolithic Societies of Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gibbon, W., 1964. Asiatic parallels in North American star lore: Ursa Major. Journal of American Folklore 77, 236–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbon, W., 1972. Asiatic parallels in North American star lore: Milky Way, Pleiades, Orion. Journal of American Folklore 85, 236–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gleitman, H., 1995. Psychology. 4th ed. Norton, W. W., London.

Guthrie, S., 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hinde, R. A., 1999. Why Gods Persist: A Scientific Approach to Religion. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Ingold, T., 1999. On the social relations of the hunter-gatherer band. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, eds. Lee, R. B. and Daly, R.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lee, R. B. and Daly, R., 1999. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lévy-Bruhl, L., 1935/1973. Primitives and the Supernatural. Translated by Clare, L. A.. Haskell House Publishers, New York.Google Scholar

Marshack, A., 1964. Lunar notation on Upper Paleolithic remains. Science 184, 28–46.Google Scholar

Marshack, A., 1972. Upper Paleolithic notation and symbol. Science 178, 817–28CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marshack, A., 1991. The Tai plaque and calendrical notation in the Upper Palaeolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 25–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Renfrew, C. and Scarre, C., 1998. Cognition and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Symbolic Storage. McDonald Institute, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tylor, E. B., 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. John Murray, London.Google Scholar

Williamson, R. A and Farrer, C. R., 1992. Earth and Sky: Visions of the Cosmos in Native American Folklore. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar

Zubrow, E. B. W. and Daly, P. T., 1998. Symbolic behaviour: The origin of a spatial perspective. In Cognition and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Symbolic Storage, eds. Renfrew, C. and Scarre, C.. McDonald Institute, Cambridge, 157–74.Google Scholar