Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:59:39.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The token system of the ancient Near East: Its role in counting, writing, the economy and cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Iain Morley
Affiliation:
The MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
Colin Renfrew
Affiliation:
The MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
Get access

Summary

This chapter deals with a system of counters – clay tokens – used for over 4,000 years in the prehistoric Near East (7500–3100 BC). Relying on a database of some 8,000 tokens from Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Iraq and Iran (Schmandt-Besserat 1992, I & II), I discuss the evolution of the token system, the method of counting it implies and how it led to writing and abstract numbers (Butterworth 1999, 29–32; Rogers 2005, 81–84). Lastly, in the light of the token system, I address the relation of counting and measurements to the economy and to cognition.

Tokens and pictographic writing

Before starting my discussion I explain how the Mesopotamian pictographic and cuneiform scripts are critical to understanding the token system (Schmandt-Besserat 1996).

During the first 500 years following its invention about 3200 BC, writing in Mesopotamia was used exclusively for accounting (Cooper 2004, 72). The tablets served a city state administration scrupulously to record entries and expenditures of goods in the temple and palace. The first Mesopotamian script featured two kinds of signs: impressed signs stood for numerals and signs traced with a stylus represented the goods accounted (Figure 3.1). As is explained later, both of these types of signs, impressed and traced, were images or ‘pictographs’ of small counters, that is, tokens previously used for record keeping. Some of the pictographs can be understood by matching them to the cuneiform signs that derived from them. The pictographs therefore constitute a ‘Rosetta Stone’ to decipher the age-old token system.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Archaeology of Measurement
Comprehending Heaven, Earth and Time in Ancient Societies
, pp. 27 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algaze, G., 1993. The Uruk World System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beale, T. W., 1978. Beveled Rim Bowls and Their Implications for Change and Economic Organization in the Later Fourth Millennium B.C. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 37 (4) 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, B., 1999. The Mathematical Brain. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J., 1978. Les Premiers Villages de Syrie-Palestine du IXeme au VIIeme Millenaire avant J.C. Lyon: Maison de l'Orient.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. S., 2004. Babylonian Beginnings: The Origin of the Cuneiform Writing System in Comparative Perspective, in The First Writing, ed. Houston, S. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71–99.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, I. M., 1983. Some Reflexions on Numerals in Sumerian towards a History of Mathematical Speculations. Journal of the American Oriental Society 103 (1) 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englund, R. K., 1998. Texts from the Late Uruk Period, in Mesopotamian Spaeturuk-Zeit und Fruedynastische Zeit, eds. Bauer, Josef, Englund, Robert K. and Krebernik, Manfred (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis, 160/1). Freiburg Schweiz: Universitaetsverlag, 15–217.Google Scholar
Englund, R. K. 2004. The State of Decipherment of Proto-Elamite, in The First Writing, ed. Houston, Stephen D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–149.Google Scholar
Fiandra, E., 1979. The Connection between Clay Sealings and Tablets in the Administration, in South Asian Archaeology 1979, ed. H. Hartel. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag, 29–43.Google Scholar
Frangipane, M., Ferioli, P., Fiandra, E., et al., 2007. Arslantepe Cretulae: An Early Centralized Administrative System before Writing. Roma: Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Edizione CIRAAS.Google Scholar
Friberg, J., 2007. A Remarkable Collection of Babylonian Texts. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J., 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoyrup, J., 1994. In Measure, Number, and Weight. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Justus, C., 1999a. Pre-decimal Structures in Counting and Metrology, in Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide, ed. Gvozdanovic, Jaranda. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 55–79.Google Scholar
Justus, C., 1999b. Can a Counting System Be an Index of Linguistic Relationship? Journal of Indo-European Studies, Monograph 33, 219–240.Google Scholar
Justus, C., 2004. On Language and the Rise of a Base for Counting. General Linguistics 42, 17–43.Google Scholar
Liverani, M., 2006. Uruk, the First City. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P., 1993. Tokenism. American Anthropologist 95 (4) 996–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H. J., Damerow, P., and Englund, R. K., 1993. Archaic Bookkeeping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., 1980. Introduction, in The Social Foundation of Language and Thought, ed. Olson, D. R.. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rogers, H., 2005. Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosengarten, Y., 1960. Le Concept sumerien de consummation dans la vie economique et religieuse. Paris: Editions E. de Boccard.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1992. Before Writing. Vol. I, From Counting to Cuneiform. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1992. Before Writing. Vol. II, A Catalogue of Near Eastern Tokens. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1996. How Writing Came About. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Szarzynska, K., 1997. Sumerica (Philologia Orientalis). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie, Dialog.Google Scholar
Zimansky, P., 1993. Book review ofBefore Writing. Journal of Field Archaeology 20 (4) 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×