Ackrill, J. L. 1979. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ackrill, J. L.. 1981. “Aristotle's Theory of Definition: Some Questions on Posterior Analytics II. 8–10.” In Berti, E., ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, 359–84. Padova: Antenore.

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1891a. In Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria. In Hayduck, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca. I. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1891b. In Aristotelis Topicorum Libri Octo Commentaria. In Wallies, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 2. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Allen, Reginald. 1963. “Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues.” In Allen, R., ed., Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, 43–60. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Annas, Julia. 1994. “Plato the Skeptic.” In Waerdt, Paul A. Vander, ed., The Socratic Movement, 309–40. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Annas, Julia. 1999. “Aristotle on Human Nature and Political Virtue.” In Gerson, Lloyd, ed., Aristotle Critical Assessments, vol. 4, 48–66. London and New York: Routledge.

Anton, John. 1968. “The Aristotelian Doctrine of Homonuma in the Categories and its Platonic Antecedents.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6: 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anton, John. 1969. “Ancient Interpretations of Aristotle's Doctrine of Homonuma.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. 1995. “Suarez on the Analogy of Being: Some Historical Background.” Vivarium 33: 50–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubenque, Pierre. 1962. Le Problème de L'Être chez Aristote. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Balme, D. M. 1972. Aristotle's De Partibus Animalium I & De Generatione Animalium I. Translated with Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Balme, D. M.. 1987. “Aristotle's Use of Division and Differentiae.” In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J., eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 69–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1971. “Homonymy in Aristotle and Speusippus.” Classical Quarterly 21: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1975. “Aristotle's Theory of Demonstration.” In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R., eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 1: Science, 65–87. London: Duckworth.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1980. “Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34: 490–511.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1981. “Proof and the Syllogism.” In Berti, E., ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum, 17–59. Padova: Antenore.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1994. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Translated with Commentary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1999. “An Introduction to Aspasius.” In Alberti, A., and Sharples, R., eds., Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commentary on Aristotle's Ethics, 1–50. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Barnes, Jonathan, Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R., eds. 1979. Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics. London: Duckworth

Bayer, Greg. 1998. “Classification and Explanation in Aristotle's Theory of Definition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berti, Enrico. 1971. “Multiplicité et Unité du Bien selon Eudemian Ethics 8.” In Moreaux, P. and Harlfinger, D., eds., Untersuchungen sur Eudemischen Ethik, 157–84. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Berti, Enrico. 1996. “Does Aristotle's Conception of Dialectic Develop?” In Wians, W., ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development, 105–30. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.

Berti, Enrico. 1999. “Amecizia e ‘Focal Meaning’” In Alberti, A. and Sharples, R., eds., Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commentaries, 176–90. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Berti, Enrico. 2001. “Multiplicity and Unity of Being in Aristotle.” Proceedings of the Aristotle Society 101: 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackson, Thomsas. 1991. “Plato and the Senses of Words.” Journal of the History of Philosophy (April): 169–82.Google Scholar

Bloom, Allan. 1991. Plato: Republic. Translated with Commentary. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.

Bluck, R. S. 1955. Plato: Phaedo. Translated with Introduction and Notes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bolton, Robert. 1976. “Essentialism and Semantic Theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II. 7–10.” Philosophical Review 85: 514–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, Robert. 1978. “Aristotle's Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1–3.” Phronesis 23: 258–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, Robert. 1985. “Aristotle on the Signification of Names.” In Language and Reality in Greek Philosophy, 153–62. Second International Philosophy Symposium. Athens: Hellenike Philosophike Hetaireia.

Bolton, Robert. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In Gotthelf, A., and Lennox, J., eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 120–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bolton, Robert. 1990. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.” In Devereaux, D. and Pellgrin, P., eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique Chez Aristote, 185–236. Paris: Editions du CNRS.

Bolton, Robert. 1995. “Science and the Science of Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Z.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 419–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, Robert. 1999. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.” In Shields, Christopher, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Ancient Philosophy, 57–109. New York: Lexington Books.

Bonitz, Hermann. 1848–49. Aristotelis Metaphysica: Commentarius, 2 vols. Bonn. Rpt., Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1960.

Bostock, David. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Zeta and Eta. Translated with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brentano, Franz. 1862. Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles Freiburg im Breisgau. Translated as On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle, ed. and trans. George, Rolf. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.

Burnet, John. 1900. The Ethics of Aristotle. Edited with Introduction and Notes. London: Methuen.

Burnet, John. 1911. Plato: Phaedo. Edited with Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burnyeat, M. F. et. al. 1979. Notes on Book Zeta of Aristotle's “Metaphysics.” Study Aids Monograph No. 1. Oxford: Sub-faculty of Philosophy.

Burnyeat, M. F.. 1981. “Aristotle on Understanding Knowledge.” In Berti, E., ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, 97–139. Padova: Antenore.

Burnyeat, M. F.. 2002. “De Anima II 5.” Phronesis 48, no. 1: 28–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. 1589–90. Summa Sacrae Theologicae; in tres partes divisa, et quattor distincta tomis. Bergamo: Comini Venturae.

Cajetan, Cardinal. 1934. De Nominum Analogia. Rome.

Charles, David. 1990. “Natural Kinds and Natural History.” In Devereaux, D. and Pellgrin, P., eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique chez Aristote, 145–67. Paris: Edition du CNRS.

Charleton, W. 1970. Aristotle's Physics I, II. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

Cherniss, Harold. 1944. Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Code, Alan. 1984. “The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z.” In Pelletier, F. J. and Farlow, J. K., eds., New Essays on Aristotle. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplementary vol. 10, pp. 1–20.

Code, Alan. 1985. “On the Origins of Some Aristotelian Theses about Predication.” In Bogen, James, ed., How Things Are, 101–32. Boston: Reidel.

Code, Alan. 1986. “Aristotle's Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16: 314–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Code, Alan. 1997. “Aristotle's Metaphysics as a Science of Principles.” Revue Internationale de Filosophie 201: 345–66.Google Scholar

Cooper, John. 1977. “Aristotle on the Forms of Friendship.” Review of Metaphysics 30: 619–48.Google Scholar

Cooper, John. 1984. “Aristotle on Friendship.” In Rorty, A., ed., Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, 301–40. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rijk, L. M. 2002. Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.

DeMoss, David, and Devereaux, Daniel. 1988. “Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 8–10.” Phronesis 33, no. 2: 133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devereaux, Daniel. 1990. “Comments on Robert Bolton's ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.’” In Devereaux, D. and Pellegrin, P., eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique chez Aristote, 263–86. Paris: Edition du CNRS.

Deslauriers, Marguerite. 1990. “Aristotle's Four Types of Definition.” Apeiron 23: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dexippus. 1888. Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium. In Busse, A., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 4, part 2. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Evans, J. D. G. 1978. Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Everson, Stephen, 1997. Aristotle on Perception. New York: Clarendon Press.

Ferejohn, Michael. 1980. “Aristotle on Focal Meaning and the Unity of Science.” Phronesis 25: 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, Michael. 1991. The Origins of Aristotelian Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Fine, Gail. 1995. On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1975a. “Aristotle's Analysis of Friendship: Function and Analogy, Resemblance and Focal Meaning.” Phronesis 20: 51–62.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W.. 1975b. Aristotle on Emotion. New York: Harper & Row.

Frede, Michael. 1983. “Titel, Einheit und Echtheit der Aristotelischen Kategorienschrift.” In Moreaux, P. and Weisner, J., eds., Zwelfelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum, 1–29. Berlin. Translated as “The Title, Unity, and Authenticity of the Aristotelian Categories.” In Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 11–28. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

Frede, Michael. 1987. “The Unity of Special and General Metaphysics.” In Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 81–95. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Goldin, Owen. 1996. Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 2.1–10. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Hambruch, Ernst. 1904. Logische Regeln der Platonischen Schule in der Aristotelischen Topik. Berlin: Weidmann.

Hamlyn, D. W. 1977–78. “Focal Meaning.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78: 1–18.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D. W. 1990. “Aristotle on Dialectic.” Philosophy 65: 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Sir Thomas. 1908. Euclid: The Thirteen Books of the Elements. Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1956.

Heath, Sir Thomas. 1921. A History of Greek Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Heath, Sir Thomas. 1949. Mathematics in Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hicks, R. D. 1907. Aristotle: De Anima. With Translation, Introduction, and Notes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hintikaa, Jaakko. 1971. “Different Kinds of Equivocation in Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 9: 368–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hintikaa, Jaakko. 1996. “On the Development of Aristotle's Ideas of Scientific Method and the Structure of Science.” In Wians, W., ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development, 83–104. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Hirschenberger, J. 1959. “Paronymie und Analogie bei Aristoteles.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 68: 191–203.Google Scholar

Huby, Pamela. 1962. “The Date of Aristotle's Topics and Its Treatment of the Theory of Ideas.” Classical Quarterly n.s., 12: 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Terence. 1981. “Homonymy in Aristotle.” Review of Metaphysics 34: 523–44.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. 1988. Aristotle's First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kenny, Antony. 1978. The Aristotelian Ethics: A Study of the Relationship Between the Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kirwan, Christopher. 1993. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Γ, Δ, and E. Translated with notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kraut, Richard, ed. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lang, Paul. 1911. De Speusippi Academici Scriptis. Accedunt Fragmenta. Rpt., Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964.

Le Blond, J. M. 1979. “Aristotle on Definition.” In Barnes, et al. (1979, 63–70).

Lennox, J. G. 1987. “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice.” in Gotthelf, A., and Lennox, J. G., eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 90–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leszl, Walter. 1970. Logic and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Padova: Antenore.

Levin, Susan. 2001. The Ancient Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited: Plato and the Greek Literary Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, Frank. 2004. “Aristotle on the Homonymy of Being.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68, no. 1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liddell, Henry, and Scott, Robert. 1968. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lloyd, A. C. 1962. “Genus, Species, and Ordered Series in Aristotle.” Phronesis 7: 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Scott. 1989. “Aristotle and the Homonymy of the Good.” Archiv fur die Geschicte der Philosophie 71, no.2: 150–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malcolm, John. 1991. Plato and the Self-Predication of the Forms: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McInerny, Ralph. 1992. “Aquinas and Analogy: Where Cajetan Went Wrong.” Philosophical Topics 20: 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKirahan, Richard. 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Meinwald, Constance. 1995. “Goodbye to the Third Man.” In Kraut, Richard, ed., Cambridge Companion to Plato, 365–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mirus, Christopher V. 2004. “Aristotle's Agathon.” Review of Metaphysics 57, no. 3: 515–36.Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah. 2001. Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nehamas, Alexander. 1979. “Self-Predication and Plato's Theory of the Forms.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 93–103.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha. 1982. “Saving Aristotle's Appearances.” In Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M., eds., Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, 267–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, Martha. 1986a. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, Martha, ed. 1986b. Logic, Science and Dialectic. Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Owen, G. E. L. 1957. “A Proof in the Peri Ideon.”Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 103–11; Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 165–79).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1960. “Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle.” In During, I. and Owen, G. E. L., eds., Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, 163–90. Goteborg: Elanders. Reprinted in J. Barnes, M. Schofield, R. Sorabji, eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics (London: Duckworth, 1979), 13–32, and Nussbaum (1986b, 180–99).

Owen, G. E. L.. 1961. “Tithenai Ta Phainomena.” In Mansion, S., ed., Aristote et les Problèmes de Methode, 83–105. Louvain: Publications Universitaires. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 239–51).

Owen, G. E. L.. 1965. “Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology.” In Bambrough, J. R., ed., New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, 69–75. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 259–78).

Owen, G. E. L.. 1966a. “The Platonism of Aristotle.” Proceedings of the British Academy 50: 125–50. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 200–220).Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L.. 1966b. “Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present.” Monist 50: 317–40.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L.. 1968. “Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms.” In Owen, G. E. L., ed., Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, 103–25. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 221–38).

Owens, Joseph. 1963. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics. Toronto: Pontifical Institute.

Owens, Joseph. 1971. “Aristotle's Definitions of the Soul.” In Palmer, R. and Hamerton-Kelly, R., eds., Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan, 124–45. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Pakaluk, Michael. 1992. “Friendship and the Comparison of Goods.” Phronesis 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pakaluk, Michael. 1998. Nicomachean Ethics Books VIII and IX. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Patzig, Gunther. 1979a. “Logical Aspects of Some Arguments in Aristotle's Metaphysics.” In Aubenque, R., ed., Etudes sur la Métaphysique d'Aristote, 37–46. Paris: Vrin.

Patzig, Gunther. 1979b. “Theology and Ontology in Aristotle's Metaphysics.” In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., Sorabji, R., eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics, 33–49. London: Duckworth.

Porphyry. 1897. In Aristotelis Categoria Commentaria In Hayduck, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4 part 1 Berlin: Reimer. Translated as On Aristotle's Categories by S. Strange. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992.

Price, A. W. 1989. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rapp, Christof. 1992. “Ahnlichkeit, Analogie, und Homonymie bei Aristoteles.” Zeitschrift fur philosophische Forschung 46: 526–44.Google Scholar

Robin, Leon. 1963. La Théorie Platonicienne des Idées et des Nombres d'après Aristote. Paris: Alcan.

Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle Metaphysics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, 2 vols. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

Ross, W. D.. 1936. Aristotle Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

Ross, W. D.. 1949a. Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ross, W. D.. 1949b. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics. A Revised Text With Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.

Rowe, C. J. 1971. The Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics: A Study in the Development of Aristotle's Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.

Shields, Christopher. 1999. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Silverman, Allan. 1989. “Color and Color Perception in Aristotle's De Anima.” Ancient Philosophy 9, no. 2:271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simplicius. 1897. In Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium. In Wallies, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 8. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Slakey, Thomas J. 1961. “Aristotle on Sense Perception.” Philosophical Review 70: 470–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Robin. 1993. “Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic.” Synthese 96: 335–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Robin. 1997. Aristotle: Topics Books I and VIII. Translated with a Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Smith, Robin. 1999. “Dialectic and Method in Aristotle.” In Sim, M., ed., From Puzzles to Principles, Essays on Aristotle's Dialectic, 39–55. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.

Solmsen, Friedrich. 1929. Die Entwicklung der Aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik. Berlin.

Solmsen, Friedrich. 1968. “Dialectic Without the Forms.” In Owen, G. E. L., ed., Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics, 49–68. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sorabji, Richard. 1972. “Aristotle, Mathematics and Colour.” Classical Quarterly 22: 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. 1974. “Body and Soul in Aristotle.” Philosophy 49: 63–89. Reprinted in J. Barnes et al., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 4: Psychology and Aesthetics, 42–64. London: Duckworth, 1979.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. 1992. “Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle's Theory of Sense-Perception.” In Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, A., eds., Essays on Aristotle's De Anima, 195–226. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stenzel, J. 1929. “Speusippos (2).” In Pauly, A. and Wissowa, G., eds., Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft III A, cols. 1636–69. Stuttgart.

Strauss, Leo. 1978. The City and the Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Taran, Leonardo. 1978a. Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle's De Interpretatione. Codex Parisinus Graecus 2064.

Taran, Leonardo. 1978b. “Speusippus and Aristotle on Homonymy and Synonymy.” Hermes 106: 73–99.Google Scholar

Taran, Leonardo. 1981. Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.

Taylor, A. E. 1962. A Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Vlastos, Gregory. 1954. “The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides.” Philosophical Review 63: 319–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, A. D. M. 1979. “Aristotle's Account of Friendship in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Phronesis 24: 180–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1988. “Perception and Logos in De Anima ⅱ. 12.” Ancient Philosophy 8: 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1995. “Focal Reference in Aristotle's Account of Φιλία: Eudemian Ethics VII 2.” Apeiron 28: 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1996. “Souls and Figures: Defining the Soul in De Anima ⅱ 3.” Ancient Philosophy 16: 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K.. 2005. “Aristotle on Physis: Human Nature in the Ethics and Politics.” Polis: Journal of the Society for Greek Political Thought 22: 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waterlow, Sarah. 1988. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle's Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Wedin, Michael. 2000. Aristotle's Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wians, William, ed. 1996. Aristotle's Philosophical Development. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Wieland, Wolfgang. 1962. Die Aristotelische Physik. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Witt, Charlotte. 1996. “The Evolution of Development Interpretations in Aristotle.” In Wians, William, ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, 67–82. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Wuellner, Bernard. 1956. Dictionary of Scholastic Philosophy. Milwaukee, Wis.: Bruce Publishing.

Yu, Jiyuan. 2001. “What is the Focal Meaning of Being in Aristotle?” Apeiron 34, no. 3: 205–31.Google Scholar

Yu, Jiyuan. 2003. The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics. New Synthese Histroical Library, vol. 52. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Ackrill, J. L. 1979. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ackrill, J. L.. 1981. “Aristotle's Theory of Definition: Some Questions on Posterior Analytics II. 8–10.” In Berti, E., ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, 359–84. Padova: Antenore.

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1891a. In Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria. In Hayduck, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca. I. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1891b. In Aristotelis Topicorum Libri Octo Commentaria. In Wallies, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 2. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Allen, Reginald. 1963. “Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues.” In Allen, R., ed., Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, 43–60. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Annas, Julia. 1994. “Plato the Skeptic.” In Waerdt, Paul A. Vander, ed., The Socratic Movement, 309–40. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Annas, Julia. 1999. “Aristotle on Human Nature and Political Virtue.” In Gerson, Lloyd, ed., Aristotle Critical Assessments, vol. 4, 48–66. London and New York: Routledge.

Anton, John. 1968. “The Aristotelian Doctrine of Homonuma in the Categories and its Platonic Antecedents.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6: 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anton, John. 1969. “Ancient Interpretations of Aristotle's Doctrine of Homonuma.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. 1995. “Suarez on the Analogy of Being: Some Historical Background.” Vivarium 33: 50–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubenque, Pierre. 1962. Le Problème de L'Être chez Aristote. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Balme, D. M. 1972. Aristotle's De Partibus Animalium I & De Generatione Animalium I. Translated with Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Balme, D. M.. 1987. “Aristotle's Use of Division and Differentiae.” In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J., eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 69–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1971. “Homonymy in Aristotle and Speusippus.” Classical Quarterly 21: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1975. “Aristotle's Theory of Demonstration.” In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R., eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 1: Science, 65–87. London: Duckworth.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1980. “Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34: 490–511.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1981. “Proof and the Syllogism.” In Berti, E., ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum, 17–59. Padova: Antenore.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1994. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Translated with Commentary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Barnes, Jonathan. 1999. “An Introduction to Aspasius.” In Alberti, A., and Sharples, R., eds., Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commentary on Aristotle's Ethics, 1–50. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Barnes, Jonathan, Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R., eds. 1979. Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics. London: Duckworth

Bayer, Greg. 1998. “Classification and Explanation in Aristotle's Theory of Definition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berti, Enrico. 1971. “Multiplicité et Unité du Bien selon Eudemian Ethics 8.” In Moreaux, P. and Harlfinger, D., eds., Untersuchungen sur Eudemischen Ethik, 157–84. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Berti, Enrico. 1996. “Does Aristotle's Conception of Dialectic Develop?” In Wians, W., ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development, 105–30. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.

Berti, Enrico. 1999. “Amecizia e ‘Focal Meaning’” In Alberti, A. and Sharples, R., eds., Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commentaries, 176–90. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Berti, Enrico. 2001. “Multiplicity and Unity of Being in Aristotle.” Proceedings of the Aristotle Society 101: 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackson, Thomsas. 1991. “Plato and the Senses of Words.” Journal of the History of Philosophy (April): 169–82.Google Scholar

Bloom, Allan. 1991. Plato: Republic. Translated with Commentary. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.

Bluck, R. S. 1955. Plato: Phaedo. Translated with Introduction and Notes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bolton, Robert. 1976. “Essentialism and Semantic Theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II. 7–10.” Philosophical Review 85: 514–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, Robert. 1978. “Aristotle's Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1–3.” Phronesis 23: 258–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, Robert. 1985. “Aristotle on the Signification of Names.” In Language and Reality in Greek Philosophy, 153–62. Second International Philosophy Symposium. Athens: Hellenike Philosophike Hetaireia.

Bolton, Robert. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In Gotthelf, A., and Lennox, J., eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 120–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bolton, Robert. 1990. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.” In Devereaux, D. and Pellgrin, P., eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique Chez Aristote, 185–236. Paris: Editions du CNRS.

Bolton, Robert. 1995. “Science and the Science of Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Z.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 419–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, Robert. 1999. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.” In Shields, Christopher, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Ancient Philosophy, 57–109. New York: Lexington Books.

Bonitz, Hermann. 1848–49. Aristotelis Metaphysica: Commentarius, 2 vols. Bonn. Rpt., Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1960.

Bostock, David. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Zeta and Eta. Translated with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brentano, Franz. 1862. Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles Freiburg im Breisgau. Translated as On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle, ed. and trans. George, Rolf. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.

Burnet, John. 1900. The Ethics of Aristotle. Edited with Introduction and Notes. London: Methuen.

Burnet, John. 1911. Plato: Phaedo. Edited with Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burnyeat, M. F. et. al. 1979. Notes on Book Zeta of Aristotle's “Metaphysics.” Study Aids Monograph No. 1. Oxford: Sub-faculty of Philosophy.

Burnyeat, M. F.. 1981. “Aristotle on Understanding Knowledge.” In Berti, E., ed., Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, 97–139. Padova: Antenore.

Burnyeat, M. F.. 2002. “De Anima II 5.” Phronesis 48, no. 1: 28–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. 1589–90. Summa Sacrae Theologicae; in tres partes divisa, et quattor distincta tomis. Bergamo: Comini Venturae.

Cajetan, Cardinal. 1934. De Nominum Analogia. Rome.

Charles, David. 1990. “Natural Kinds and Natural History.” In Devereaux, D. and Pellgrin, P., eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique chez Aristote, 145–67. Paris: Edition du CNRS.

Charleton, W. 1970. Aristotle's Physics I, II. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

Cherniss, Harold. 1944. Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Code, Alan. 1984. “The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z.” In Pelletier, F. J. and Farlow, J. K., eds., New Essays on Aristotle. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplementary vol. 10, pp. 1–20.

Code, Alan. 1985. “On the Origins of Some Aristotelian Theses about Predication.” In Bogen, James, ed., How Things Are, 101–32. Boston: Reidel.

Code, Alan. 1986. “Aristotle's Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16: 314–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Code, Alan. 1997. “Aristotle's Metaphysics as a Science of Principles.” Revue Internationale de Filosophie 201: 345–66.Google Scholar

Cooper, John. 1977. “Aristotle on the Forms of Friendship.” Review of Metaphysics 30: 619–48.Google Scholar

Cooper, John. 1984. “Aristotle on Friendship.” In Rorty, A., ed., Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, 301–40. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rijk, L. M. 2002. Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.

DeMoss, David, and Devereaux, Daniel. 1988. “Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 8–10.” Phronesis 33, no. 2: 133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devereaux, Daniel. 1990. “Comments on Robert Bolton's ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.’” In Devereaux, D. and Pellegrin, P., eds., Biologie, Logique, et Métaphysique chez Aristote, 263–86. Paris: Edition du CNRS.

Deslauriers, Marguerite. 1990. “Aristotle's Four Types of Definition.” Apeiron 23: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dexippus. 1888. Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium. In Busse, A., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 4, part 2. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Evans, J. D. G. 1978. Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Everson, Stephen, 1997. Aristotle on Perception. New York: Clarendon Press.

Ferejohn, Michael. 1980. “Aristotle on Focal Meaning and the Unity of Science.” Phronesis 25: 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, Michael. 1991. The Origins of Aristotelian Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Fine, Gail. 1995. On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1975a. “Aristotle's Analysis of Friendship: Function and Analogy, Resemblance and Focal Meaning.” Phronesis 20: 51–62.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W.. 1975b. Aristotle on Emotion. New York: Harper & Row.

Frede, Michael. 1983. “Titel, Einheit und Echtheit der Aristotelischen Kategorienschrift.” In Moreaux, P. and Weisner, J., eds., Zwelfelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum, 1–29. Berlin. Translated as “The Title, Unity, and Authenticity of the Aristotelian Categories.” In Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 11–28. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

Frede, Michael. 1987. “The Unity of Special and General Metaphysics.” In Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, 81–95. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Goldin, Owen. 1996. Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 2.1–10. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Hambruch, Ernst. 1904. Logische Regeln der Platonischen Schule in der Aristotelischen Topik. Berlin: Weidmann.

Hamlyn, D. W. 1977–78. “Focal Meaning.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78: 1–18.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D. W. 1990. “Aristotle on Dialectic.” Philosophy 65: 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Sir Thomas. 1908. Euclid: The Thirteen Books of the Elements. Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1956.

Heath, Sir Thomas. 1921. A History of Greek Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Heath, Sir Thomas. 1949. Mathematics in Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hicks, R. D. 1907. Aristotle: De Anima. With Translation, Introduction, and Notes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hintikaa, Jaakko. 1971. “Different Kinds of Equivocation in Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 9: 368–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hintikaa, Jaakko. 1996. “On the Development of Aristotle's Ideas of Scientific Method and the Structure of Science.” In Wians, W., ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development, 83–104. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Hirschenberger, J. 1959. “Paronymie und Analogie bei Aristoteles.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 68: 191–203.Google Scholar

Huby, Pamela. 1962. “The Date of Aristotle's Topics and Its Treatment of the Theory of Ideas.” Classical Quarterly n.s., 12: 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Terence. 1981. “Homonymy in Aristotle.” Review of Metaphysics 34: 523–44.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. 1988. Aristotle's First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kenny, Antony. 1978. The Aristotelian Ethics: A Study of the Relationship Between the Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kirwan, Christopher. 1993. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Γ, Δ, and E. Translated with notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kraut, Richard, ed. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lang, Paul. 1911. De Speusippi Academici Scriptis. Accedunt Fragmenta. Rpt., Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964.

Le Blond, J. M. 1979. “Aristotle on Definition.” In Barnes, et al. (1979, 63–70).

Lennox, J. G. 1987. “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice.” in Gotthelf, A., and Lennox, J. G., eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, 90–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leszl, Walter. 1970. Logic and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Padova: Antenore.

Levin, Susan. 2001. The Ancient Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited: Plato and the Greek Literary Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, Frank. 2004. “Aristotle on the Homonymy of Being.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68, no. 1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liddell, Henry, and Scott, Robert. 1968. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lloyd, A. C. 1962. “Genus, Species, and Ordered Series in Aristotle.” Phronesis 7: 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Scott. 1989. “Aristotle and the Homonymy of the Good.” Archiv fur die Geschicte der Philosophie 71, no.2: 150–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malcolm, John. 1991. Plato and the Self-Predication of the Forms: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McInerny, Ralph. 1992. “Aquinas and Analogy: Where Cajetan Went Wrong.” Philosophical Topics 20: 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKirahan, Richard. 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Meinwald, Constance. 1995. “Goodbye to the Third Man.” In Kraut, Richard, ed., Cambridge Companion to Plato, 365–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mirus, Christopher V. 2004. “Aristotle's Agathon.” Review of Metaphysics 57, no. 3: 515–36.Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah. 2001. Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nehamas, Alexander. 1979. “Self-Predication and Plato's Theory of the Forms.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 93–103.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha. 1982. “Saving Aristotle's Appearances.” In Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M., eds., Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, 267–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, Martha. 1986a. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, Martha, ed. 1986b. Logic, Science and Dialectic. Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Owen, G. E. L. 1957. “A Proof in the Peri Ideon.”Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 103–11; Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 165–79).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1960. “Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle.” In During, I. and Owen, G. E. L., eds., Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, 163–90. Goteborg: Elanders. Reprinted in J. Barnes, M. Schofield, R. Sorabji, eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics (London: Duckworth, 1979), 13–32, and Nussbaum (1986b, 180–99).

Owen, G. E. L.. 1961. “Tithenai Ta Phainomena.” In Mansion, S., ed., Aristote et les Problèmes de Methode, 83–105. Louvain: Publications Universitaires. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 239–51).

Owen, G. E. L.. 1965. “Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology.” In Bambrough, J. R., ed., New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, 69–75. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 259–78).

Owen, G. E. L.. 1966a. “The Platonism of Aristotle.” Proceedings of the British Academy 50: 125–50. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 200–220).Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L.. 1966b. “Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present.” Monist 50: 317–40.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L.. 1968. “Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms.” In Owen, G. E. L., ed., Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, 103–25. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Rpt., Nussbaum (1986b, 221–38).

Owens, Joseph. 1963. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics. Toronto: Pontifical Institute.

Owens, Joseph. 1971. “Aristotle's Definitions of the Soul.” In Palmer, R. and Hamerton-Kelly, R., eds., Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan, 124–45. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Pakaluk, Michael. 1992. “Friendship and the Comparison of Goods.” Phronesis 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pakaluk, Michael. 1998. Nicomachean Ethics Books VIII and IX. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Patzig, Gunther. 1979a. “Logical Aspects of Some Arguments in Aristotle's Metaphysics.” In Aubenque, R., ed., Etudes sur la Métaphysique d'Aristote, 37–46. Paris: Vrin.

Patzig, Gunther. 1979b. “Theology and Ontology in Aristotle's Metaphysics.” In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., Sorabji, R., eds., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3: Metaphysics, 33–49. London: Duckworth.

Porphyry. 1897. In Aristotelis Categoria Commentaria In Hayduck, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4 part 1 Berlin: Reimer. Translated as On Aristotle's Categories by S. Strange. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992.

Price, A. W. 1989. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rapp, Christof. 1992. “Ahnlichkeit, Analogie, und Homonymie bei Aristoteles.” Zeitschrift fur philosophische Forschung 46: 526–44.Google Scholar

Robin, Leon. 1963. La Théorie Platonicienne des Idées et des Nombres d'après Aristote. Paris: Alcan.

Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle Metaphysics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, 2 vols. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

Ross, W. D.. 1936. Aristotle Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

Ross, W. D.. 1949a. Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ross, W. D.. 1949b. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics. A Revised Text With Introduction and Commentary. Rpt., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.

Rowe, C. J. 1971. The Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics: A Study in the Development of Aristotle's Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.

Shields, Christopher. 1999. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Silverman, Allan. 1989. “Color and Color Perception in Aristotle's De Anima.” Ancient Philosophy 9, no. 2:271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simplicius. 1897. In Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium. In Wallies, M., ed., Commentaria in Aristotelum Graeca, vol. 8. Berlin: G. Reimer.

Slakey, Thomas J. 1961. “Aristotle on Sense Perception.” Philosophical Review 70: 470–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Robin. 1993. “Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic.” Synthese 96: 335–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Robin. 1997. Aristotle: Topics Books I and VIII. Translated with a Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Smith, Robin. 1999. “Dialectic and Method in Aristotle.” In Sim, M., ed., From Puzzles to Principles, Essays on Aristotle's Dialectic, 39–55. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.

Solmsen, Friedrich. 1929. Die Entwicklung der Aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik. Berlin.

Solmsen, Friedrich. 1968. “Dialectic Without the Forms.” In Owen, G. E. L., ed., Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics, 49–68. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sorabji, Richard. 1972. “Aristotle, Mathematics and Colour.” Classical Quarterly 22: 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. 1974. “Body and Soul in Aristotle.” Philosophy 49: 63–89. Reprinted in J. Barnes et al., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 4: Psychology and Aesthetics, 42–64. London: Duckworth, 1979.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. 1992. “Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle's Theory of Sense-Perception.” In Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, A., eds., Essays on Aristotle's De Anima, 195–226. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stenzel, J. 1929. “Speusippos (2).” In Pauly, A. and Wissowa, G., eds., Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft III A, cols. 1636–69. Stuttgart.

Strauss, Leo. 1978. The City and the Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Taran, Leonardo. 1978a. Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle's De Interpretatione. Codex Parisinus Graecus 2064.

Taran, Leonardo. 1978b. “Speusippus and Aristotle on Homonymy and Synonymy.” Hermes 106: 73–99.Google Scholar

Taran, Leonardo. 1981. Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.

Taylor, A. E. 1962. A Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Vlastos, Gregory. 1954. “The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides.” Philosophical Review 63: 319–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, A. D. M. 1979. “Aristotle's Account of Friendship in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Phronesis 24: 180–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1988. “Perception and Logos in De Anima ⅱ. 12.” Ancient Philosophy 8: 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1995. “Focal Reference in Aristotle's Account of Φιλία: Eudemian Ethics VII 2.” Apeiron 28: 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1996. “Souls and Figures: Defining the Soul in De Anima ⅱ 3.” Ancient Philosophy 16: 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Julie K.. 2005. “Aristotle on Physis: Human Nature in the Ethics and Politics.” Polis: Journal of the Society for Greek Political Thought 22: 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waterlow, Sarah. 1988. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle's Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Wedin, Michael. 2000. Aristotle's Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wians, William, ed. 1996. Aristotle's Philosophical Development. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Wieland, Wolfgang. 1962. Die Aristotelische Physik. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Witt, Charlotte. 1996. “The Evolution of Development Interpretations in Aristotle.” In Wians, William, ed., Aristotle's Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, 67–82. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Wuellner, Bernard. 1956. Dictionary of Scholastic Philosophy. Milwaukee, Wis.: Bruce Publishing.

Yu, Jiyuan. 2001. “What is the Focal Meaning of Being in Aristotle?” Apeiron 34, no. 3: 205–31.Google Scholar

Yu, Jiyuan. 2003. The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics. New Synthese Histroical Library, vol. 52. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.