Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:43:56.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Lightning elimination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2009

Martin A. Uman
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Modifying the cloud electrification process

In many circumstances it would be valuable to suppress or eliminate lightning. One potential way to do so would be to eliminate or reduce the source of lightning, the cloud charge. The primary charging mechanism in a thundercloud is thought to involve interactions between soft hail (graupel) falling under the influence of gravity and lighter ice crystals rising in the cloud's updrafts, all in the presence of liquid water drops not yet frozen but at an altitude where the temperature is colder than the freezing temperature (32 ° or 0 °). Additional information is found in Section 1.1. Since cloud electrification is related to the falling precipitation within the cloud, and since this electrification is what produces lightning, it is reasonable to suppose that the amount of lightning is related to the amount of precipitation that is falling inside and below the cloud. Observationally, this is the case. In fact, one can often estimate the amount of rainfall (melted ice forms) that will reach the ground below a thunderstorm by counting the number of lightning flashes in the storm; the more lightning, the more rainfall (e.g., MacGorman and Rust 1998, Table 7.6; Takayabu 2006; Gungle and Krider 2006). For example, for nine isolated thunderstorms in Florida, Gungle and Krider (2006) found that each cloud-to-ground lightning flash was accompanied by an average rain volume of 2.6 × 104 ± 2.1 × 104 m3 (or a mean rainwater mass of 2.6 × 107 kg) as measured by rain gauges on the ground.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bent, R. B. and Llewellyn, S. K. 1977. An investigation of the lightning elimination and strike reduction properties of dissipation arrays. Review of Lightning Protection Technology for Tall Structures, ed. Hughes, J.. Publ. AD-A075 449. Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, pp. 149–241.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. B. 1977. 170 system years of guaranteed lightning protection. Review of Lightning Protection Technology for Tall Structures, ed. Hughes, J. Publ. AD-A075 449. Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. B. and Auer, R. L. 1995. Lightning and surge protection of substations. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 31, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. B. 1990. Benjamin Franklin's Science. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Durrett, W. R. 1977. Dissipation arrays at Kennedy Space Center. Review of Lightning Protection Technology for Tall Structures, ed. Hughes, J.. Publ. AD-A075 449. Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, pp. 24–52.Google Scholar
FAA 1990. 1989 Lightning protection multiple discharge systems tests: Orlands, Sarasota and Tampa, Florida. FAATCT16 Power Systems Program, ACN Final Report. Federal Aviation Administration.
Golde, R. H. 1977. The lightning conductor. In Lightning Protection, Vol. 2: Lightning, ed. Golde, R. H.. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 545–576.Google Scholar
Gungle, B. and Krider, E. P. 2006. Cloud-to-ground lightning and surface rainfall in warm-season Florida thunderstorms. J. Geophys. Res. 111, doi:10.1029/2005JD006802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holitza, F. J. and Kasemir, H. W. 1974. Accelerated decay of thunderstorm electric fields by chaff seeding. J. Geophys. Res. 79: 425–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J. 1977. Introduction to Review of Lightning Protection Technology for Tall Structures, ed. Hughes, J.. Publ. AD-A075 449. Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, pp. i–iv.Google Scholar
Kasemir, H. W., Holitza, F. J., Cobb, W. E. and Rust, W. D. 1976. Lightning suppression by chaff seeding at the base of thunderstorm. J. Geophys. Res. 81: 1965–1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuwabara, N., Tominaga, T., Kanazawa, M. and Kuramoto, S. 1998. Probability occurrence of estimated lightning surge current at lightning rod before and after installing dissipation array system (DAS). IEEE Electromag. Compat. Int. Symp. Record, Denver, CO., pp. 1072–1077.Google Scholar
List, R. 2004. Weather modification – a scenario for the future. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85: 51–63, doi:10.1175/BAMS-85-1-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGorman, D. R. and Rust, W. D. 1998. The Electrical Nature of Storms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddox, R. A., Howard, K. W. and Dempsey, C. L. 1997. Intense convective storms with little or no lightning over central Arizona: a case of inadvertent weather modification?J. Appl. Meteorol. 36: 302–314.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousa, A. M. 1998. The applicability of lightning elimination devices to substations and power lines. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 13: 1120–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Hillebrand, D. 1962. The protection of houses by lightning conductors – an historical review. J. Franklin Inst. 273: 35–44.Google Scholar
Rakov, V. A. and Uman, M. A. 2003. Lightning: Physics and Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rourke, C. 1994. A review of lightning-related operating events at nuclear power plants. IEEE Trans. Energy Conver. 9: 636–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takayabu, Y. N. 2006. Rain-yield per flash calculated from TRMM PR and LIS data and its relationship to the contribution of tall convective rain. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33: L18705, doi:10.1029/2006GL027531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uman, M. A. and Rakov, V. A. 2002. A critical review of non-conventional approaches to lightning protection. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83: 1809–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeleny, J. 1934. Do lightning rods prevent lightning?Science 79: 269–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Lightning elimination
  • Martin A. Uman, University of Florida
  • Book: The Art and Science of Lightning Protection
  • Online publication: 17 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585890.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Lightning elimination
  • Martin A. Uman, University of Florida
  • Book: The Art and Science of Lightning Protection
  • Online publication: 17 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585890.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Lightning elimination
  • Martin A. Uman, University of Florida
  • Book: The Art and Science of Lightning Protection
  • Online publication: 17 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585890.014
Available formats
×