Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:33:12.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Cultural Modeling as Opportunity to Learn

Making Problem Solving Explicit in Culturally Robust Classrooms and Implications for Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Carol D. Lee
Affiliation:
Professor of Education and Social Policy in the Learning Sciences Program, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University
Pamela A. Moss
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Diana C. Pullin
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
James Paul Gee
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Edward H. Haertel
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Lauren Jones Young
Affiliation:
The Spencer Foundation, Chicago
Get access

Summary

The cornerstone of assessment is localized in the face-to-face interactions in daily classroom instruction. Daily instruction involves understanding how learning inside disciplines should be organized to respond to the needs of particular learners. This chapter examines how opportunity to learn (OTL) can be structured in classrooms serving culturally diverse students in ways that (1) build on fundamental propositions in cognition; (2) focus on generative topics, concepts, and forms of problem solving within subject matters; and (3) scaffold forms of knowledge and ways of using language emerging from students' everyday experiences in families and communities. The basic argument is that reconceptualizing forms of assessment in the absence of reconceptualizing instruction will yield few results.

In this chapter, OTL means students have a right to rigorous instruction that:

  1. 1) is organized in ways to build on and expand forms of prior knowledge they construct from their experiences outside school and across their years of schooling;

  2. 2) provides them with models of expertise (e.g., models of more expert problem solving) and in-time feedback on the progress of their learning in ways that are usable and motivating; and

  3. 3) focuses on powerful and generative topics, concepts, and problem-solving strategies within academic subject matters and across their years of schooling in ways that help them make sense of how their learning is useful in the world.

In order for these opportunities to take root, several important issues must be addressed. First, we must have good operational definitions and illustrations of learning within subject matters from a developmental perspective.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anyon, J. 1981. Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry 11: 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applebee, A. 1993. Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the United States (NCTE Research Report No. 25). Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Applebee, A., Burroughs, R., and Stevens, A.. 2000. Creating continuity and coherence in high school literature curricula. Research in the Teaching of English 34: 396–429.Google Scholar
Ball, A. 2006. Multicultural strategies for education and social change: Carriers of the torch in the United States and South Africa. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Ballenger, C. 1997. Social identities, moral narratives, scientific argumentation: Science talk in a bilingual classroom. Language and Education 11: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baquedano-Lopez, P. 1997. Creating social identities through Doctrina narratives. Issues in Applied Linguistics 8: 27–45.Google Scholar
Baron, R., D. Y. H. Tom, and H. M. Cooper. 1985. Social class, race and teacher expectations. In Teacher expectations, edited by Dusek, J. B.. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. and Engelmann, S.. 1966. Teaching disadvantaged children in pre-school. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Booth, W. 1974. A rhetoric of irony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Booth, W. 1983. A rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R.. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R., Hombo, C. M., and Mazzeo, J.. 2000. NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. 1978. Knowledge structures and memory development. In Children's thinking: What develops, edited by Siegler, R., 73–96. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clement, J. 1989. Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 1241–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, F. 1996. Drums in the science lab. Hands On 19: 7–10.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. 1985. Equality and excellence: The educational status of Black Americans. New York: The College Board.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. 1987. Teacher quality and inequality. In Access to knowledge, edited by Keating, P. and Goodlad, J.. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. 1999. Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar
DeMeis, D. K. and Turner, R. R.. 1978. Effects of students' race, physical attractiveness and dialect on teachers' evaluations. Contemporary Educational Psychology 3: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiSessa, A. 1982. Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-base learning. Cognitive Science 6: 37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, D. P. 2004, September. Spring 2004 MCAS Tests: Summary of state results. Malden: Massachusetts Board of Education.Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1980. Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, M. 1987. “It's cookin' now”: A performance analysis of the speech events of a Black teacher in an urban community college. Language in Society 18: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M. 1997. Black teachers on teaching. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Fugees, . 1996. The mask. On the Score. Holland: Ruffhouse Records.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 1994. First language acquisition as a guide for theories of learning and pedagogy. Linguistics and Education 6: 331–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P. 2001. Research on the teaching of literature: Finding a place, 4th ed. New York: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D.. 1972. Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., and Tejeda, C.. 1999. Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the Third Space. Mind, Culture, and Activity 6: 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., and Larson, J.. 1995. Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review 65: 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A. 1987. Democratic education. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Hernstein, R. J. and Murray, C.. 1994. The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G. and Ludlow, L.. 1984. A taxonomy of skills in reading and interpreting fiction. American Educational Research Journal 21: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. 1980. Language in education: Ethnolinguistic essays. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. 1990. Black students and school failure. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. 1969. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review 39: 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitwana, B. 2002. The hip hop generation: Young Blacks and the crisis in African American culture. New York: Basic Civitas.Google Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. 1994. The dreamkeepers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Nunez, R.. 2000. Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lam, E. 2000. L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly 34: 457–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1993. Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation: The pedagogical implications of an African American discourse genre. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1995a. A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students' skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly 30: 608–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1995b. Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation. Journal of Black Psychology 21: 357–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1995c. Viewpoints: Symposium on the usefulness of literacy research. Research in the Teaching of English 29: 335–8.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 1998. Supporting the development of interpretive communities through metacognitive instructional conversations in culturally diverse classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association.
Lee, C. D. 2000. Signifying in the zone of proximal development. In Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry, edited by Lee, C. D. and Smagorinsky, P., 191–225. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2001. Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal 38: 97– 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2002. When and where I enter: Understanding and choreographing instructional discourse based on African American English discourse patterns. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2003a. Cultural modeling and the challenges of Chicago high school reform. In Chicago high school reform, edited by Lee, V.. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Reform.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2003b. Cultural modeling and pedagogical content knowledge: The case of the teacher of literature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2004. Literacy in the academic disciplines and the needs of adolescent struggling readers. Voices in Urban Education 3.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2005. Double voiced discourse: African American Vernacular English as resource in Cultural Modeling classrooms. In New literacies for new times: Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning for the 21st century, edited by Ball, A. and Freedman, S. W.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. 2007. Culture, literacy and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. and D. Slaughter-Defoe. 1995. Historical and sociocultural influences on African American education. In Handbook of research on multicultural education, edited by Banks, J. and Banks, C., 348–71. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D., Spencer, M. B., and Harpalani, V.. 2003. Every shut eye ain't sleep: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher 32: 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. D. and Spratley, A.. In press. Reading in the disciplines and the challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Foundation of New York.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. 1998. Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourse of science, edited by Martin, J. R. and Veel, R., 87–113. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. 1979. Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. 1981. Signifying, loud-talking and marking. In Mother wit from the laughing barrel, edited by Dundes, A., 310–328. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Moll, L. and N. Gonzales. 2004. Engaging life: A funds of knowledge approach to multicultural education. In Handbook of research on multicultural education, 2nd ed., edited by Banks, J. and Banks, C. A. M.. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. 1998. More than a mood or an attitude: Discourse and verbal genres in African American culture. In African-American English: Structure, history, and use, edited by Mufwene, S. S., Rickford, J. R., and Bailey, G.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morrell, E. 2002. Toward a critical pedagogy of popular culture: Literacy development among urban youth. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 46: 72–78.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., P. Gonzales, and S. Jacoby. 1996. When I come down I'm in the domain state: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In Interaction and grammar, edited by Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. and Thompson, S., 328–69. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orellana, M., J. Reynolds, L. Dorner, and M. Metaleza. 2003. In other words: Translating or “para-phrasing” as a family literacy practice in immigrant households. Reading Research Quarterly 38: 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, E. W. 1987. Twice as less: Black English and the performance of Black students in mathematics and science. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pea, R. D. and Gomez, L.. 1992. Distributed multimedia learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments 2: 73–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. 1992. Smart schools: Better thinking and learning for every child. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. 1993. Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations edited by Salomon, G., 88–110. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, P. 1987. Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, R. 1970. Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review 40: 411–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. and Lave, J.. 1984. Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., R. Paradise, R. Mejía Arauz, M. Correa Chávez, and C. Angelillo, et al. 2003. Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 175–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, T. 1994. Black noise: Rap music and Black culture in contemporary America. Hanover, N.H.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Rosebery, A. S., B. Warren, C. Ballenger, and M. Ogonowski. 2005. The generative potential of students' everyday knowledge in learning science. In Understanding mathematics and science matters, edited by Romberg, T., Carpenter, T., and Fae, D.. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., and Conant, F. R. 1992. Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of Learning Sciences 2: 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education, edited by Spiro, R., Bruce, B., and Brewer, W., 33–58. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Salomon, G. 1993. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, P. and Gevinson, S.. 1989. Fostering the reader's response: Rethinking the literature curriculum, grades 7–12. Palo Alto, Calif.: Dale Seymour Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, M. and Hillocks, G.. 1988. Sensible sequencing: Developing knowledge about literature text by text. English Journal, October: 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smitherman, G. 1977. Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Smitherman, G. 2000. Talkin that talk: Language, culture and education in African America. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, M. B. 2006. Phenomenology and ecological systems theory: Development of diverse groups. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M., eds., Handbook of child psychology, 6th ed., vol. 1, 829–93. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Steffensen, M., Joag-Dev, C., and Anderson, R.. 1979. A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 15: 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stotsky, S. 1999. Losing our language: How multicultural classroom instruction is undermining our children's ability to read, write, and reason. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. 1982. The use of figurative devices in aiding comprehension for speakers of Black English. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Tompkins, J. 1980. Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Valdes, G. 2002. Expanding the definitions of giftedness: The case of young interpreters from immigrant countries. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dunk, E. and Dickman, A. M.. 2004. School choice and the question of accountability: The Milwaukee experience. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, edited by Cole, M. et al. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. 1981. The genesis of higher mental functions. In The concept of activity in Soviet psychology, edited by Wertsch, J.. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. 1985. Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wineburg, S. 1991. Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wineburg, S. and Grossman, P.. 1998. Creating a community of learners among high school teachers. Phi Delta Kappan 73: 684–9.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. P. 1995. Reading reconsidered: Literature and literacy in high school. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
Wright, B. D. and Masters, G.. 1982. Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar
Wright, B. D. and Stone, M. H. 1979. Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×