Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Cases
- List of Commonwealth Constitution Provisions
- List of Statutes
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction: The Commonwealth's Constitutional Century
- 1 The Emergence of the Commonwealth Constitution
- 2 The Engineers Case
- 3 The Uniform Income Tax Cases
- 4 The Bank Nationalisation Cases: The Defeat of Labor's Most Controversial Economic Initiative
- 5 The Communist Party Case
- 6 Fitzpatrick and Browne: Imprisonment by a House of Parliament
- 7 The Boilermakers Case
- 8 The Race Power: A Constitutional Chimera
- 9 The Double Dissolution Cases
- 10 1975: The Dismissal of the Whitlam Government
- 11 The Tasmanian Dam Case
- 12 The Murphy Affair in Retrospect
- 13 The Privy Council and the Constitution
- 14 Cole v Whitfield: ‘Absolutely Free’ Trade?
- 15 The ‘Labour Relations Power’ in the Constitution and Public Sector Employees
- 16 The Implied Freedom of Political Communication
- Index
9 - The Double Dissolution Cases
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Cases
- List of Commonwealth Constitution Provisions
- List of Statutes
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction: The Commonwealth's Constitutional Century
- 1 The Emergence of the Commonwealth Constitution
- 2 The Engineers Case
- 3 The Uniform Income Tax Cases
- 4 The Bank Nationalisation Cases: The Defeat of Labor's Most Controversial Economic Initiative
- 5 The Communist Party Case
- 6 Fitzpatrick and Browne: Imprisonment by a House of Parliament
- 7 The Boilermakers Case
- 8 The Race Power: A Constitutional Chimera
- 9 The Double Dissolution Cases
- 10 1975: The Dismissal of the Whitlam Government
- 11 The Tasmanian Dam Case
- 12 The Murphy Affair in Retrospect
- 13 The Privy Council and the Constitution
- 14 Cole v Whitfield: ‘Absolutely Free’ Trade?
- 15 The ‘Labour Relations Power’ in the Constitution and Public Sector Employees
- 16 The Implied Freedom of Political Communication
- Index
Summary
Section 57, which was designed to create a mechanism for the resolution of a ‘deadlock’ over a proposed law arising between the House of Representatives and the Senate, has played and will continue to play a critical part in Australian constitutional and political controversies. In some respects, however, the operation of the section remains uncertain. It was most certainly uncertain, in 1974, when the controversy over the double dissolution arising from the Senate's rejection of the Petroleum and Minerals Authority Bill (‘PMA Bill’) and five other Bills arose. This rejection generated a continuing constitutional controversy which was resolved by three High Court decisions: Cormack v Cope, PMA and the Territory Senators case.
Section 57
Section 57 provides:
If the House of Representatives passes any proposed law, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the House of Representatives, in the same or the next session, again passes the proposed law with or without any amendments which have been made, suggested, or agreed to by the Senate, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, the Governor-General may dissolve the Senate and the House of Representatives simultaneously. But such dissolution shall not take place within six months before the date of the expiry of the House of Representatives by effluxion of time. […]
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Australian Constitutional Landmarks , pp. 213 - 228Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.