from Part IV - Latitudinal Gradients
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2013
Introduction
The relationship between climate and biodiversity is perhaps the most widely recognized and extensively studied pattern of nature on earth. Attempts to explain this relationship and the attendant latitudinal gradient in diversity began more than 200 years ago (von Humboldt, 1808; Wallace, 1878) and indeed the number of theories that attempt to address this question appears to be accumulating at an ever increasing rate. However, one theory which has received relatively little attention began with the observation by Rensch (1959) that animals living in warmer tropical climates have shorter generation times than those living at higher latitudes. He suggested that because natural selection accumulates change with each generation, shorter generation times found among tropical fauna might increase the pace of natural selection and thereby the pace at which evolution progresses. A faster evolutionary speed in the tropics would therefore lead to the evolution of more species there than at higher latitudes over an equivalent period of time.
Evidence suggesting that mutations can be induced by high temperatures prompted Rohde (1978, 1992) to predict that not only might rates of selection increase with increasing ambient energy towards the tropics, but that rates of mutation may also be greater in lower-latitude climates. It is predicted that the combined effects of faster rates of mutation and faster rates of selection will lead to greater rates of diversification. Over an equivalent period of time, regions experiencing generally faster rates of genetic evolution will therefore generate and accumulate more species and greater species richness than regions where genetic evolution is slower. Fundamental to this hypothesis is the precept that the incumbent diversity of species within communities is not at an equilibrium number set by contemporary environmental conditions. Instead, it suggests that communities continue to accumulate species at rates that depend on climatic variables. This theory is therefore quite different to those, such as the energy-richness or more individuals hypothesis (Hutchinson, 1959; Brown, 1981; Wright, 1983), that suggest that diversity is limited by energetic capacity of the environment and that species origination and extinction are therefore held in balance with climate.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.