Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 36
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hartwell, Kayla S. Notman, Hugh and Pavelka, Mary S. M. 2018. Seasonal and sex differences in the fission–fusion dynamics of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis) in Belize. Primates, Vol. 59, Issue. 6, p. 531.

    Lonsdorf, Elizabeth V. Gillespie, Thomas R. Wolf, Tiffany M. Lipende, Iddi Raphael, Jane Bakuza, Jared Murray, Carson M. Wilson, Michael L. Kamenya, Shadrack Mjungu, Deus Collins, D. Anthony Gilby, Ian C. Stanton, Margaret A. Terio, Karen A. Barbian, Hannah J. Li, Yingying Ramirez, Miguel Krupnick, Alexander Seidl, Emily Goodall, Jane Hahn, Beatrice H. Pusey, Anne E. and Travis, Dominic A. 2018. Socioecological correlates of clinical signs in two communities of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes ) at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. American Journal of Primatology, Vol. 80, Issue. 1, p. e22562.

    Markham, A. Catherine and Gesquiere, Laurence R. 2017. Costs and benefits of group living in primates: an energetic perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 372, Issue. 1727, p. 20160239.

    Surbeck, Martin Girard-Buttoz, Cédric Boesch, Christophe Crockford, Catherine Fruth, Barbara Hohmann, Gottfried Langergraber, Kevin E. Zuberbühler, Klaus Wittig, Roman M. and Mundry, Roger 2017. Sex-specific association patterns in bonobos and chimpanzees reflect species differences in cooperation. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 4, Issue. 5, p. 161081.

    Carrier, David R. and Cunningham, Christopher 2017. The effect of foot posture on capacity to apply free moments to the ground: implications for fighting performance in great apes. Biology Open, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 269.

    Moscovice, Liza R. Douglas, Pamela Heidi Martinez-Iñigo, Laura Surbeck, Martin Vigilant, Linda and Hohmann, Gottfried 2017. Stable and fluctuating social preferences and implications for cooperation among female bonobos at LuiKotale, Salonga National Park, DRC. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 163, Issue. 1, p. 158.

    Miller, Jordan A. Stanton, Margaret A. Lonsdorf, Elizabeth V. Wellens, Kaitlin R. Markham, A. Catherine and Murray, Carson M. 2017. Limited evidence for third-party affiliation during development in wild chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii ) . Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 4, Issue. 9, p. 170500.

    Busia, Laura Schaffner, Colleen M. Aureli, Filippo and Schneider, J. 2017. Relationship quality affects fission decisions in wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi ). Ethology, Vol. 123, Issue. 6-7, p. 405.

    Murray, Carson M. Stanton, Margaret A. Lonsdorf, Elizabeth V. Wroblewski, Emily E. and Pusey, Anne E. 2016. Chimpanzee fathers bias their behaviour towards their offspring. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 3, Issue. 11, p. 160441.

    Jaeggi, Adrian V. Boose, Klaree J. White, Frances J. and Gurven, Michael 2016. Obstacles and catalysts of cooperation in humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees: behavioural reaction norms can help explain variation in sex roles, inequality, war and peace. Behaviour, Vol. 153, Issue. 9-11, p. 1015.

    Murray, Carson M. Lonsdorf, Elizabeth V. Stanton, Margaret A. Wellens, Kaitlin R. Miller, Jordan A. Goodall, Jane and Pusey, Anne E. 2014. Early social exposure in wild chimpanzees: Mothers with sons are more gregarious than mothers with daughters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue. 51, p. 18189.

    Emery Thompson, Melissa Muller, Martin N. and Wrangham, Richard W. 2014. Male chimpanzees compromise the foraging success of their mates in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 68, Issue. 12, p. 1973.

    Otani, Yosuke Sawada, Akiko and Hanya, Goro 2014. Short-term separation from groups by male Japanese macaques: Costs and benefits in feeding behavior and social interaction. American Journal of Primatology, Vol. 76, Issue. 4, p. 374.

    Machanda, Zarin P. Gilby, Ian C. and Wrangham, Richard W. 2013. Male–Female Association Patterns Among Free-ranging Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). International Journal of Primatology, Vol. 34, Issue. 5, p. 917.

    Wittiger, Livia and Boesch, Christophe 2013. Female gregariousness in Western Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) is influenced by resource aggregation and the number of females in estrus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 67, Issue. 7, p. 1097.

    Clay, Zanna and Zuberbühler, Klaus 2012. Communication during sex among female bonobos: effects of dominance, solicitation and audience. Scientific Reports, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,

    Caperos, José M. Morcillo, Ana Peláez, Fernando Fidalgo, Ana and Sánchez, Susana 2012. The Effect of Infant Body Mass on Carrier Travel Speed in Cotton-top Tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). International Journal of Primatology, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 447.

    Barker, Jessica L. Barclay, Pat and Reeve, H. Kern 2012. Within-group competition reduces cooperation and payoffs in human groups. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 735.

    Pearson, Heidi C. 2011. Sociability of female bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Understanding evolutionary pathways toward social convergence. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 85.

    Riedel, Julia Franz, Mathias and Boesch, Christophe 2011. How feeding competition determines female chimpanzee gregariousness and ranging in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire. American Journal of Primatology, Vol. 73, Issue. 4, p. 305.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2002
  • Online publication date: February 2010

14 - Costs and benefits of grouping for female chimpanzees at Gombe

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Most diurnal primates live in permanent social groups. Chimpanzees, however, exhibit a fission–fusion social structure in which individuals of the social group or community spend some time alone and the rest of the time in parties of varying composition. These, in turn, comprise subsets of the total community. In this regard, chimpanzees resemble several other species of large-bodied, frugivorous primates. A common explanation is that in such species, predation risk, a major factor in producing group living, is relaxed because of large body size. Group size then adjusts to the distribution and abundance of food sources, which vary over time (van Schaik & van Hooff 1983; Terborgh & Janson 1986; Dunbar 1988). These explanations regard plentiful food as a permissive factor for group formation. The possibility that individuals actually gain more food by joining groups through information transfer or better exploitation of resources has received less attention in primate than in other animal studies (Wilson 1975; Rodman 1988) and deserves further study.

A number of researchers have investigated variables important in controlling party formation in chimpanzees. Besides grouping at plentiful food sources, the benefits of grouping they have considered include mating prospects, measured by the presence of sexually receptive females (Goodall 1986; Sakura 1994; Boesch 1996; Wrangham 2000; Anderson et al., Chapter 6; Mitani et al., Chapter 7; Wrangham, Chapter 15), cooperative hunting (Boesch 1996) and safety in numbers, either from predation (Boesch 1991), conspecific threat (Bauer 1980), or human disturbance (Sakura 1994). Research investigating party size in chimpanzees has focused on limits to party size, assuming that benefits of grouping are always high enough that observed patterns are a product of the costs (Wrangham 1979, 2000).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos
  • Online ISBN: 9780511606397
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606397
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×