Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T22:18:30.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Socially Embedded Benefaction on Delos

from Part III - Hellenistic Benefactors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Marc Domingo Gygax
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Arjan Zuiderhoek
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Get access

Summary

This chapter considers the ‘vase festivals’ recorded on Hellenistic Delos as benefactions, and then considers the implications of this approach on our chronology for the period. It argues that the vase festival was a socially constrained form of competitive display, one open only to Delians and others who successfully sought and negotiated this privilege. Through the endowment and the associated display, these individuals claimed and performed a distinct superior status: as patrons of the sanctuary. But this was not an exclusive claim. It coexisted with and competed with other claims, both when they were founded and in subsequent years. As such, the dates and periods during which royal (and non-royal) individuals founded these vase festivals (Third Ptolemaea, 246/5 BC, Soteria/Antigonia, 245/4 BC, etc.) can be understood as periods of engagement by those individuals on Delos and the region. But this competitive context indicates that they should not be understood as dates for changes of control. Quite the reverse: if the vase festivals have any implication for our understanding of the broader geopolitical terrain – and they may not – they indicate that these were times when interest in the sanctuary and the region were higher, and when any specific patronage or hegemonic relationships in the sanctuary and the region were particularly contested.

Type
Chapter
Information
Benefactors and the Polis
The Public Gift in the Greek Cities from the Homeric World to Late Antiquity
, pp. 179 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bikerman, E. (1938) ‘Sur les batailles navales de Cos et d’Andros’, Revue des Études Anciennes 40: 369–83.Google Scholar
Bruneau, P. (1970) Recherches sur les cultes de Délos à l’époque hellénistique et à l’époque impériale. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruneau, P. (1987) ‘Deliaca (VI)’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 111: 313–42.Google Scholar
Bruneau, P. (1990) ‘Deliaca (VIII)’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 114: 553–91.Google Scholar
Bruneau, P., and Ducat, J. (2005) Guide de Délos, 4th ed. Athens.Google Scholar
Buraselis, K. (1982) Das hellenistische Makedonien und die Ägäis. Forschungen zur Politik des Kassandros und der drei ersten Antigoniden (Antigonos Monophthalmos, Demetrios Poliorketes und Antigonos Gonatas) im Ägäischen Meer und in Westkleinasien. Munich.Google Scholar
Chankowski, V. (2008) Athènes et Délos à l’époque classique: recherches sur l’administration du sanctuaire d’Apollon délien. Athens.Google Scholar
Duchêne, H., and Fraisse, P. (2001) Le paysage portuaire de la Délos antique: recherches sur les installations maritimes, commerciales et urbaines du littoral délien. Athens.Google Scholar
Durrbach, F. (1916) ‘La chronologie des archontes déliens’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 40: 298352.Google Scholar
Durrbach, F. (1921–3) Choix d’inscriptions de Délos. Paris.Google Scholar
Errington, R.M. (1990) A History of Macedonia. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fellmann, W. (1930) Antigonos Gonatas, König der Makedonen, und die griechischen Staaten. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Guggenmos, A.T. (1929) ‘Die Geschichte des Nesiotenbundes bis zur Mitte des III. Jahrhunderts vor Chr. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Gründungsproblems’, PhD dissertation, University of Würzburg.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (2000) Treasure Map: A Guide to the Delian Inventories. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. G. L. (1989) The Macedonian State: Origins, Institutions, and History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. G. L., Griffith, G. T., and Walbank, F. W. (1972–88) A History of Macedonia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heckel, W. (1986) ‘Review: [untitled]’, Phoenix 40: 458–61.Google Scholar
Hellmann, M.-C., and Fraisse, P. (1979) Le monument aux hexagones et le Portique des Naxiens. Paris.Google Scholar
Homolle, T. (1887) Les archives de l’intendance sacrée à Délos (315–166 av. J.-C.). Paris.Google Scholar
Kolbe, W. (1916) ‘Review. Tarn Antigonos Gonatas’, Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen 178: 433–75.Google Scholar
König, W. (1910) Der Bund der Nesioten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Kykladen und benachbarten Inseln im Zeitalter des Hellenismus. Halle an der Saale.Google Scholar
Neer, R. T. (2001) ‘Framing the gift: the politics of the Siphnian treasury at Delphi’, Classical Antiquity 20: 273336.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (2005) Polytheism and Society at Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Prêtre, C., and Brunet, M. (2002) Nouveau choix d’inscriptions de Délos: lois, comptes et inventaires. Athens.Google Scholar
Reger, G. L. (1985) ‘The date of the battle of Kos’, American Journal of Ancient History 10: 155–77.Google Scholar
Reger, G. L. (1994a) ‘The political history of the Kyklades 260–200 B.C.’, Historia 43: 3269.Google Scholar
Reger, G. L. (1994b) Regionalism and Change in the Economy of Independent Delos, 314–167 B.C. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Roussel, P. (1924) ‘Les inscriptions de Délos’, Journal des Savants 22: 103–16, 163–9.Google Scholar
Rups, M. (1986) ‘Thesauros: a study of the treasury building as found in Greek sanctuaries’, PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Schalles, H.-J. (1985) Untersuchungen zur Kulturpolitik der pergamenischen Herrscher im dritten Jahrhundert vor Christus. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, H. (1999) ‘Untersuchungen zum hellenistischen Herrscherkult in Pergamon’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 49: 249300.Google Scholar
Shipley, G. (2000) The Greek World after Alexander, 323–30 B.C. London.Google Scholar
Tréheux, J. (1959) ‘Études critiques sur les inventaires de l’indépendance délienne’, PhD dissertation, University of Paris.Google Scholar
Tréheux, J. (1987), ‘L’Hiéropoion et les oikoi du sanctuaire à Délos’, in Servais, J., Hackens, T. and Servais-Soyez, B. (eds.), Stemmata: mélanges de philologie, d’histoire et d’archéologie grecques offerts à Jules Labarbe. Liege, 377–90.Google Scholar
Vallois, R. (1944) L’architecture hellénique et hellénistique à Délos jusqu’à l’éviction des Déliens (166 av. J.-C.). Paris.Google Scholar
Vial, C. (1984) Délos indépendante. Athens.Google Scholar
Vial, C. (2008) Les Déliens. Paris.Google Scholar
Will, É. (1979–82) Histoire politique du monde hellénistique (323–30 av. J.-C.), 2nd ed. Nancy.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×