Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:14:04.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Use of Exotic Organisms as Biopesticides: Some Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Heikki M. T. Hokkanen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
James M. Lynch
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There are currently two ways in which an exotic pathogen may be introduced into a country for biological control of a pest. It may enter as a ‘classical’ introduction, to be released and established for continuing control of a (usually exotic) pest, or it may enter as a formulated pesticide, either registered or in an experimental form. Either way, when released in the field, there is a likelihood of its establishment. There is a need, therefore, in both cases, to ensure that such introductions are safe to the environment, and pose acceptable risks to non-target organisms.

Introducing exotic pathogens – the classical precedent

Over the past century, the classical biological control of insect pests and weeds has been dominated by the introduction of insect control agents (see Hopper, Chapter 6; and Blossey, Chapter 8). The use of pathogens in classical biological control has been limited, but it is increasing as we come to understand more about the biology of pathogens and see the positive results from a handful of successful programmes.

Against insects pests, the success of the baculovirus of Oryctes rhinoceros on Pacific and Indian Ocean islands is well-known (Bedford, 1986). More recently, a number of exotic introductions have been made against other insect pests, including some cnew associations’. For instance, the fungus Entomophaga praxibuli has recently been introduced into the US from Australia for grasshopper control (Anon, 1989) and an isolate of Entomophaga grylli has been introduced from Australia to the US against the indigenous grasshopper, Phaulacridium vittatum (Milner, 1985).

Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Control
Benefits and Risks
, pp. 93 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×