Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:42:09.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Role of Behavioural Variation across Different Stages of the Introduction Process

from Part I - Behaviour and the Invasion Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

By
David G. Chapple  and
Bob B.M. Wong
Edited by
Judith S. Weis  and
Daniel Sol
Judith S. Weis
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Daniel Sol
Affiliation:
National Spanish Research Council (CSIC)
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour , pp. 7 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K.L., Greaves, S.N.J., Ritchie, P.A., et al. (2007). Behaviourally and genetically distinct populations of an invasive ant provides insight into invasion history and impacts on a tropical ant community. Biological Invasions, 9, 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M.E., Dick, J.T.A., Weyl, O.L.F., et al. (2014). Existing and emerging high impact invasive species are characterized by higher functional responses than native. Biology Letters, 10, 20130946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiel, J.J., Tingley, R. and Shine, R. (2011). Smart moves: effects of relative brain size on establishment success of invasive amphibians and reptiles. PLoS ONE, 6, e18277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubry, S., Labaune, C., Magnin, F., et al. (2006). Active and passive dispersal of an invading land snail in Mediterranean France. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 802–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbaresi, S., Santini, G., Tricarico, E., et al. (2004). Ranging behaviour of the invasive crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard). Journal of Natural History, 38, 2821–2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A.M. (2007). Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 755–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthouly-Salazar, C., van Rensburg, B.J., Le Roux, J.J., et al. (2012). Spatial sorting drives morphological variation in the invasive bird, Acridotheres tristis. PLoS ONE, 7, e38145.Google Scholar
Bezzina, C.N., Amiel, J.J. and Shine, R. (2014). Does invasion success reflect superior cognitive ability? A case study of two congeneric lizard species (Lampropholis, Scincidae). PLoS ONE, 9, e86271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biro, P.A. (2013). Are most samples of animals systematically biased? Consistent individual trait differences bias samples despite random sampling. Oecologia, 171, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biro, P.A. and Dingemanse, N.J. (2009). Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 66–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, T.M., Cassey, P. and Lockwood, J.L. (2009). The role of species traits in the establishment success of exotic birds. Global Change Biology, 15, 2852–2860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, T.M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., et al. (2011). A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, T.M., Lockwood, J.L. and Cassey, P. (2015). The influence of numbers on invasion success. Molecular Ecology, 24, 1942–1953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodin, T. and Drotz, M.K. (2014). Individual variation in dispersal associated behavioral traits of the invasive Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis, H. Milne Edwards, 1854) during initial invasion of Lake Vanern, Sweden. Current Zoology, 60, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubb, D.H., Thom, T.J. and Lucas, M.C. (2006). Movement, dispersal and refuge use of co-occurring introduced and native crayfish. Freshwater Biology, 51, 1359–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpintero, S. and Reyes-Lopez, J. (2008). The role of competitive dominance in the invasive ability of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Biological Invasions, 10, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrete, M., Edelaar, P., Blas, J., et al. (2012). Don't neglect pre-establishment individual selection in deliberate introductions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 67–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, A.J., Heinsohn, R., Goldizen, A.W., et al. (2012). Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards. Animal Behaviour, 83, 1051–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, C.F., Leitao, A.V., Funghi, C., et al. (2013). Personality traits are related to ecology across a biological invasion. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 1081–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassey, P., Blackburn, T.M., Sol, D., et al. (2004). Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 271, S405–S408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, D.G., Simmonds, S.M. and Wong, B.B.M. (2011). Know when to run, know when to hide: can behavioral differences explain the divergent invasion success of two sympatric lizards? Ecology and Evolution, 1, 278–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, D.G., Simmonds, S.M. and Wong, B.B.M. (2012a). Can behavioral and personality traits influence the success of unintentional species introductions? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, D.G., Simmonds, S.M. and Wong, B.B.M. (2012b). Intraspecific behavioral variation is important in both deliberate and unintentional species introductions: response to Carrete et al. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, D.G., Miller, K.A., Kraus, F., et al. (2013a). Divergent introduction histories among invasive populations of the delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata): has the importance of genetic admixture in the success of biological invasions been overemphasized? Diversity and Distributions, 19, 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, D.G., Whitaker, A.H., Chapple, S.N.J., et al. (2013b). Biosecurity interceptions of an invasive lizard: origin of stowaways and human-assisted spread within New Zealand. Evolutionary Applications, 6, 324–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, D.G., Miller, K.A., Chaplin, K., et al. (2014). Biology of the invasive delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata) on Lord Howe Island. Australian Journal of Zoology, 62, 498–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, D.G., Knegtmans, K., Kikillus, H., van Winkel, D. (2016). Biosecurity of exotic reptiles and amphibians in New Zealand: building upon Tony Whitaker's legacy. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 46, 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisterne, A., Vanderduys, E.P., Pike, D.A., et al. (2014). Wary invaders and clever natives: sympatric house geckos show disparate responses to predator scent. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 604–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colautti, R.I., Girgorovich, I.A. and MacIsaac, H.J. (2006). Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions, 8, 1023–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cote, J., Fogarty, S., Weinersmith, K., et al. (2010). Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 1571–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cote, J., Fogarty, S., Brodin, T., et al. (2011). Personality-dependent dispersal in the invasive mosquitofish: group composition matters. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 1670–1678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cromie, G.L. and Chapple, D.G. (2012). Impact of tail loss on the behaviour and locomotor performance of two sympatric Lampropholis skink species. PLoS One, 7, e34732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cure, K., McIlwain, J.L. and Hixon, M.A. (2014). Habitat plasticity in native Pacific red lionfish Pterois volitans facilitates successful invasion of the Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 506, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, S.R.X., Bell, A.M., Bolnick, D.I., et al. (2012). An evolutionary ecology of individual differences. Ecology Letters, 15, 1189–1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, M.A. (2009). Invasion Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, J.M. and Lodge, D.M. (2006). Allee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biological Invasions, 8, 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, R.A. and Badyaev, A.V. (2007). Coupling of dispersal and aggression facilitates the rapid range expansion of a passerine bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 15017–15022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckworth, R.A. and Kruuk, L.E.B. (2009). Evolution of genetic integration between dispersal and colonization ability in a bird. Evolution, 63, 968–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelaar, P., Roques, S., Hobson, E.A., Gonvalves da Silva, A., et al. (2015). Shared genetic diversity across the global invasive range of the monk parakeet suggests a common restricted geographic origin and the possibility of convergent selection. Molecular Ecology, 24, 2164–2176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elton, C.S. (1958). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floerl, O. and Inglis, G.J. (2005). Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biological Invasions, 7, 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, S., Cote, J. and Sih, A. (2011). Social personality polymorphism and the spread of invasive species: a model. American Naturalist, 177, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garamszegi, L.Z., Eens, M. and Török, J. (2009). Behavioural syndromes and trappability in free-living collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis. Animal Behaviour, 77, 803–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, B.J., Bejakovich, D. and Whitaker, A.H. (2001). Records of foreign reptiles and amphibians accidentally imported to New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 28, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, E.A., Butler, F. and Lawton, C. (2015). Frontier population dynamics of an invasive squirrel species: do introduced populations function differently than those in the native range? Biological Invasions, 17, 1181–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Bernal, E., Brown, G.P. and Shine, R. (2014). Invasive cane toads: social facilitation depends upon an individual's personality. PLoS One, 9(7), e102880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grangier, J. and Lester, P.J. (2012). Behavioral plasticity mediates asymmetric competition between invasive wasps and native ants. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 5, 127–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, K.R. and Barry, S.C. (2008). Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biological Invasions, 10, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heavener, S.J., Carthey, A.J.R. and Banks, P.B. (2014). Competitive naiveté between a highly successful invader and a functionally similar native species. Oecologia, 175, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, J., Cremer, S., Eckl, N., et al. (2006). Stealthy invaders: the biology of Cardiocondyla tramp ants. Insectes Sociaux, 53, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, P.Y., Salgado, C.L., Muñoz, F.P., et al. (2013). Birds introduced to new areas show rest disorders. Biology Letters, 9, 20130463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holway, D.A. and Suarez, A.V. (1999). Animal behavior: an essential component of invasion biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 328–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holway, D.A., Lach, L., Suarez, A.V., et al. (2002). The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 181–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudina, S., Hock, K. and Zganec, K. (2014). The role of aggression in range expansion and biological invasions. Current Zoology, 60, 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D.P. and Cremer, S. (2007). Plasticity in antiparasite behaviours and its suggested role in invasion biology. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1593–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, A. and Pinter-Wollman, N. (2014). Individual variation in exploratory behaviour improves speed and accuracy of collective nest selection by Argentine ants. Animal Behaviour, 93, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulme, P.E. (2009). Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knop, E., Rindlisbacher, N., Ryser, S., et al. (2013). Locomotor activity of two sympatric slugs: implications for the invasion success of terrestrial invertebrates. Ecosphere, 4, 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolar, C.S. and Lodge, D.M. (2001). Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, J.J., Glor, R.E., Schettino, L.R., et al. (2004). Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature, 431, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraus, F. (2009). Alien Reptiles and Amphibians. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.E. and Gelembiuk, G.E. (2008). Evolutionary origins of invasive populations. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebl, A.L. and Martin, L.B. (2014). Living on the edge: range edge birds consume novel foods sooner than established ones. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstrom, T., Brown, G.P., Sisson, S.A., et al. (2013). Rapid shifts in dispersal behavior on an expanding range edge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 13452–13456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S.S., De Barro, P.J., Xu, J., et al. (2007). Asymmetric mating interactions drive widespread invasion and displacement in a whitefly. Science, 318, 1769–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewelyn, J., Phillips, B.L., Alford, R.A., et al. (2010). Locomotor performance in an invasive species: cane toads from the invasion front have greater endurance, but not speed, compared to conspecifics from a long-colonised area. Oecologia, 162, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P. and Blackburn, T. (2005). The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, J.L., Hoopes, M.F. and Marchetti, M.P. (2013). Invasion Ecology, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lopez, D.P., Jungman, A.A. and Rehage, J.S. (2012). Nonnative African jewelfish are more fit but not bolder at the invasion front: a trait comparison across an Everglades range expansion. Biological Invasions, 14, 2159–2174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luan, J.B., De Barro, P.J., Ruan, Y.M. and Liu, S.S. (2013). Distinct behavioural strategies underlying asymmetric mating interactions between invasive and indigenous whiteflies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 146, 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., et al. (2000). Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecological Applications, 10, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L.B. and Fitzgerald, L. (2005). A taste for novelty in invading house sparrows, Passer domesticus. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 702–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1965). The nature of colonising birds. In The Genetics of Colonizing Species, ed. Baker, H.G. and Stebbins, G.L. New York: Academic Press, pp. 29–43.Google Scholar
McGrannachan, C.M. and Lester, P.J. (2012). Temperature and starvation effects on food exploitation by Argentine ants and native ants in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Entomology, 137, 550–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meenken, D. (2012). Pet Biosecurity in New Zealand: Current State of the Domestic Pet Trade System and Options Going Forward. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for Primary Industries.Google Scholar
Minderman, J., Reid, J.M., Evans, P.G.H., et al. (2009). Personality traits in wild starlings: exploration behaviour and environmental sensitivity. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 830–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monceau, K., Moreau, J., Poidatz, J., et al. (2014). Behavioural syndrome in a native and invasive hymenoptera species. Insect Science, 10.1111/1744–7917.12140.Google Scholar
Moule, H., Chaplin, K., Bray, R.D., et al. (2015). A matter of time: temporal variation in the introduction history and population genetic structuring of an invasive lizard. Current Zoology, 61, 456–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J.C., Edelaar, P., Carrete, M., et al. (2014). Behaviour-related DRD4 polymorphism in invasive bird populations. Molecular Ecology, 23, 2876–2885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, B.L. and Suarez, A.V. (2012). The role of behavioural variation in the invasion of new areas. In Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences, ed. Candolin, U. and Wong, B.B.M. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B.L., Brown, G.P., Webb, J.K., et al. (2006). Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature, 439, 803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pintor, L.M. and Sih, A. (2009). Differences in growth and foraging behavior of native and introduced populations in an invasive crayfish. Biological Invasions, 11, 1895–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintor, L.M., Sih, A. and Bauer, M.L. (2008). Differences in aggression, activity and boldness between native and introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. Oikos, 117, 1629–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintor, L.M., Sih, A. and Kerby, J.L. (2009). Behavioral correlations provide a mechanism for explaining high invader densities and increased impacts on native prey. Ecology, 90, 581–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polo-Cavia, N., Lopez, P. and Martin, J. (2008). Interspecific differences in responses to predation risk may confer competitive advantages to invasive freshwater turtle species. Biological Invasions, 11, 1755–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polo-Cavia, N., Lopez, P. and Martin, J. (2009). Interspecific differences in heat exchange rates may affect competition between introduced and native freshwater turtles. Ethology, 114, 115–123.Google Scholar
Polo-Cavia, N., Lopez, P. and Martin, J. (2010). Competitive interactions during basking between native and invasive freshwater turtle species. Biological Invasions, 12, 2141–2152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puth, L.M. and Post, D.M. (2005). Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecology Letters, 8, 715–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Réale, D., Reader, S.M., Sol, D., et al. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehage, J.S. and Sih, A. (2004). Dispersal behavior, boldness, and the link to invasiveness: a comparison of four Gambusia species. Biological Invasions, 6, 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehage, J.S., Barnett, B.K. and Sih, A. (2005a). Foraging behaviour and invasiveness: do invasive Gambusia exhibit higher feeding rates and broader diets than their noninvasive relatives? Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 14, 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehage, J.S., Barnett, B.K. and Sih, A. (2005b). Behavioral responses to a novel predator and competitor of invasive mosquitofish and their non-invasive relatives (Gambusia sp.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D.M. (ed.) (2011). Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rius, M. and Darling, J.A. (2014). How important is intraspecific genetic admixture to the success of colonising populations? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, B.A., Rehage, J.S. and Sih, A. (2013). Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28, 552–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowles, A.D. and O'Dowd, D.J. (2007). Interference competition by Argentine ants displaces native ants: implications for biotic resistance to invasion. Biological Invasions, 9, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J.C., McMorland, A.J.C. and MacKay, J.W.B. (2010). Exploratory behaviour of colonizing rats in novel environments. Animal Behaviour, 79, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagata, K. and Lester, P.J. (2009). Behavioural plasticity associated with propagule size, sources and the invasion success of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, K.H. and Petren, K. (2008). Boldness underlies foraging success of invasive Lepidodactylus lugubris geckos in the human landscape. Animal Behaviour, 76, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A., Bell, A. and Johnson, J.C. (2004a). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sih, A., Bell, A.M., Johnson, J.C. and Ziemba, R.E. (2004b). Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 241–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A., Cote, J., Evans, M., Fogarty, S. and Pruitt, J. (2012). Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. Ecology Letters, 15, 278–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simberloff, D. (2009). The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 40, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D. (2003). Behavioural flexibility: a neglected issue in the ecological and evolutionary literature. In Animal Innovation, ed. Reader, S.M. and Laland, K.N. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D. and Lefebvre, L. (2000). Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos, 90, 599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D. and Maspons, J.M. (2015). Integrating behavior into life history theory: a comment on Wong and Candolin. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 677–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D., Timmermans, S. and Lefebvre, L. (2002). Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour, 63, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D., Duncan, R.P., Blackburn, T.M., et al. (2005). Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 5460–5465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, D., Bacher, S., Reader, S.M., et al. (2008). Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced to novel environments. American Naturalist, 172, S63–S71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, D., Griffin, A.S., Bartomeus, I., et al. (2011). Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird. PLoS One, 6, e19535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, D., Maspons, J., Vall-llosera, M., et al. (2012). Unraveling the life history of successful invaders. Science, 337, 580–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suarez, A.V., Holway, D.A., Liange, D., et al. (2002). Spatiotemporal patterns of intraspecific aggression in the invasive Argentine ant. Animal Behaviour, 64, 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, A.V., Holway, D.A. and Ward, P.S. (2005). The role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of nonnative ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 17032–17035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suarez, A.V., Holway, D.A. and Tsutsui, N.D. (2008). Genetics and behavior of a colonizing species: the invasive Argentine ant. American Naturalist, 172, S72–S84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, C.M. and Hastings, A. (2005). Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecology Letters, 8, 895–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeria, C.P., Schetini de Azevado, C., Mendi, M., et al. (2007). Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress. Animal Behaviour, 73, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibert-Plante, X. and Hendry, A.P. (2011). The consequences of phenotypic plasticity for ecological speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 326–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tingley, R., Romagosa, C.M., Kraus, F., et al. (2010). The frog filter: amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingley, R., Thompson, M.B., Hartley, S. and Chapple, D.G. (2016). Patterns of niche filling and expansion across the invaded ranges of an Australian lizard. Ecography, 39, 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, P.C., Berec, L. and Liebhold, A.M. (2011). Exploiting Allee effects for managing biological invasions. Ecology Letters, 14, 615–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toy, S.J. and Newfield, M.J. (2010). The accidental introduction of invasive animals as hitchhikers through inanimate pathways: a New Zealand perspective. Revue Scientifique et Technique- Office International des Epizooties, 29, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Truhlar, A.M. and Aldridge, D.C. (2015). Differences in the behavioural traits between two potentially invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus and Gammarus pulex. Biological Invasions, 17, 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsutsui, N.D. and Suarez, A.V. (2003). The colony structure and population biology of invasive ants. Conservation Biology, 17, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsutsui, N.D., Suarez, A.V., Holway, D.A., et al. (2000). Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 5948–5953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ugelvig, L.V., Drijfhout, F.P., Kronauer, D.J.C., et al. (2008). The introduction history of invasive garden ants in Europe: integrating genetic, chemical and behavioural approaches. BMC Biology, 6, 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usio, N., Konishi, M. and Nakano, S. (2001). Species displacement between an introduced and a ‘vulnerable’ crayfish: the role of aggressive interactions and shelter competition. Biological Invasions, 3, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buskirk, J. (2012). Behavioural plasticity and environmental change. In Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences, ed. Candolin, U. and Wong, B.B.M. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, B. and Blows, M.W. (2009). Abundant genetic variation plus strong selection = multivariate genetic constraints: A geometric view of adaptation. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 40, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, D.F., Beggs, J.R., Clout, M.N., et al. (2006). The diversity and origin of exotic ants arriving in New Zealand via human-mediated dispersal. Diversity and Distributions, 12, 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, J.S. (2010). The role of behavior in the success of invasive crustaceans. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 43, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A.W. and Shine, R. (2009). The extra-limital spread of an invasive species via ‘stowaway’ dispersal: toad to nowhere? Animal Conservation, 12, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witmer, G.W. Snow, N.P., Moulton, R.S., et al. (2014). Responses by wild house mice (Mus musculus) to various stimuli in a novel environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 159, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. and Weissing, F.J. (2012). Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 452–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, B.B.M. and Candolin, U. (2015). Behavioral responses to changing environments. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 665–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T.F., Eberhard, J.R., Hobson, E.A., et al. (2010). Behavioral flexibility and species invasions: the adaptive flexibility hypothesis. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 22, 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×