Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:14:49.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Basics of registration

from Part V - Image analysis tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Aly A. Farag
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Registration is the process of relating source data to a target or model. It is a fundamental process in image analysis and machine learning. When the source and target are rigid, the process of registration involves obtaining a coordinate translation, rotation, and scaling to align the two entities. The alignment is performed according to a similarity (or dissimilarity) measure, usually involving minimization of square distance or maximizing common attributes (e.g. information content). Registration is performed for object recognition, for tracking changes and in image-guided interventions. When elasticity, or motion, is also present, the registration process takes on an extra layer of complexity. Elastic registration is used for tracking tumors, image-guided surgeries, and assessment of therapy. Some anatomical structures (e.g. heart and lungs) naturally move; hence, registration in such cases is inherently elastic. As it is common to use linearization over small spatial areas to analyze non-linear systems, elastic registration may be analyzed by successive and incremental applications of rigid registration over small regions of interest. Elastic registration may be conducted in two steps: global (rigid) registration followed by a local registration step to handle changes/deformations that the first step cannot handle. This chapter introduces the basic principles and terminology used in classic approaches for image registration.

Introduction

In general, the process of registration depends on: (1) the representation of the objects’ shapes or intensities; (2) the nature of the transformation to move the points from the experimental data (source) toward the model (target), or from model to data; and (3) a similarity/dissimilarity measure. The latter can be defined according to either the shape boundary or its entire region. This chapter addresses the basic fundamentals of registration. The following chapter is devoted to shape registration using variational models. Numerical examples will be provided for two common approaches: distance-based rigid registration using the iterated closest point (ICP) approach, and intensity-based image registration using the mutual information (MI) approach.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biomedical Image Analysis
Statistical and Variational Methods
, pp. 345 - 386
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Besl, P. J. and McKay, H. D., A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel. 14(2) (1992) 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces. Int. J. Comp. Vis. 13(2) (1994) 119–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamany, S. M., Ahmed, M. N. and Farag, A. A., A new genetic-based technique for matching 3D curves and surfaces. Pattern Recog. 32 (10) (1999) 1817–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamany, S. M. and Farag, A. A., Free-form surface registration using surface signatures. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision (ICCV’99), Kerkyra, Greece (September 1999) 1098–1104.Google Scholar
Yamany, S. M. and Farag, A. A., Surface signatures: an orientation independent free-form surface representation scheme for the purpose of objects registration and matching. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel. 24(8) (2002) 1105–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, P. and Wells, W., Aligment by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision, MIT, June 20–23 (1995) 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, W. M., Viola, P., Atsumi, H., Nakajima, S. and Kikinis, R., Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med. Image Anal. 1 (1996) 35–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collignon, A., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P. and Marchal, G., Automated multimodality image registration using information theory. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Information Processing in Medical Images. Boston: Kluwer (1995) 263–274.Google Scholar
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G. and Suetens, P., Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(2) (1997) 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D. and Suetens, P., Comparative evaluation of multiresolution optimization strategies for multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. Med. Image Anal. 3(4) (1999) 373–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roche, A., Malandain, G., Pennec, X. and Ayache, N., The correlation ratio as new similarity metric for multimodal image registration. In Proc. Int. Conf. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’98) (1998) 1115–1124.Google Scholar
Nett, J., Image analysis for quantification of multiple sclerosis, Unpublished M. Eng. thesis, Computer Vision and Image Processing Laboratory, December 2001.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. and Flannery, B. P., Section 10.5. Downhill simplex method in multidimensions. In Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1992).Google Scholar
Casanova, M. F., Farag, A., El-Baz, A. et al., Abnormalities of the gyral window in autism: a macroscopic correlate to a putative minicolumnopathy. J. Spec. Ed. Rehabil. 1 (2007) 85–101.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Basics of registration
  • Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville, Kentucky
  • Book: Biomedical Image Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022675.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Basics of registration
  • Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville, Kentucky
  • Book: Biomedical Image Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022675.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Basics of registration
  • Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville, Kentucky
  • Book: Biomedical Image Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022675.020
Available formats
×