Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:39:43.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Biomedical imaging modalities

from Part I - Signals and systems, image formation, and image modality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Aly A. Farag
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Methods of examining the anatomy and function of living organisms have advanced immensely over the past century. Biomedical imaging has evolved in terms of types of imaging system (modalities) and capabilities, and has improved our understanding of biological systems. It has affected the quality of our lives by transforming various medical practices from arts to science, enabling better healthcare administration, and leading on average to longer and healthier lives. The technology also has an economic impact: vast numbers of technical professionals (chemists, mathematicians, physicists, engineers, and computer scientists) work in companies making biomedical imaging devices, or in research laboratories and hospitals. One chapter cannot hope to cover a vibrant and ever-dynamic field; we will merely scratch the surface in understanding the process of image formation in some of the common imaging modalities. There are more specialized books, periodicals, and manufacturers’ reports that should be consulted by readers interested in delving into the field of biomedical imaging.

This chapter serves as a brief tour of a field of ever-expanding diversity and capabilities. The focus, however, will be on the imaging modalities that have guided the development of the basic theories and approaches to image analysis covered in the subsequent chapters of this book. We concentrate on image analysis approaches that have been well-studied for images from two broad categories of imaging sensors: those based on ionizing radiations (e.g. X-rays and computed tomography) and those based on magnetization (e.g. magnetic resonance imaging). Positron emission tomography (PET), ultrasound imaging, laser imaging, thermal infrared imaging and other modalities are also important, but this chapter will not cover all of these.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biomedical Image Analysis
Statistical and Variational Methods
, pp. 39 - 76
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hendee, W. R. and Ritenour, E. R., Medical Imaging Physics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter-Pogossian, M., The Physical Aspects of Diagnostic Radiology. New York: Harper & Row (1967).Google Scholar
Hendee, W. R., Physical Principles of Computed Tomography. Boston: Little Brown & Co. (1983).Google Scholar
Kak, A. C. and Slaney, M., Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. New York: IEEE Press. (1987).Google Scholar
Cacak, R. K., Measuring patient dose from computed tomography scanners. In Seeram, E. (ed.), Computed Tomography. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders (2001) 199–208.Google Scholar
Anger, H., Scintillation camera. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29 (1958) 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budinger, T., Physical attributes of single-photon tomography. J. Nucl. Med. 21 (1980) 579–592.Google ScholarPubMed
van Heertum, R., Current advances in hepatic SPECT imaging. In Clinical SPECT Symposium. Washington DC: American College of Nuclear Physicians (1986) 58–64.Google Scholar
Friman, L. and Soderberg, B., Spleen–liver ratio in RES scintigraphy: A comparison between posterior registration and emission computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 28 (1987) 439–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, B., Ell, P., Jarritti, P. et al., Radionuclide section scanning of the lungs in pulmonary embolism. Br. J. Radiol. 54 (1981) 586–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graff, K. F., Ultrasonics: Historical aspects. Ultrasonics Symposium. Phoenix: IEEE Conference Publications (1977) 1–10.Google Scholar
McDicken, W., Diagnostic Ultrasonics. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1976).Google Scholar
Reid, J. and Baker, D., Physics and electronics of the ultrasonic Doppler method. In Bock, J. and Ossoining, K. (eds.), Ultrasonographia Medica, Vol. 1. Proc. First World Congress on Ultrasonics in Medicine and SIDUO III. Vienna Academy of Medicine (1971) 109.Google Scholar
Shepp, L. A. and Logan, B. F., The Fourier reconstruction of a head section. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 21 (1974) 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Biomedical imaging modalities
  • Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville, Kentucky
  • Book: Biomedical Image Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022675.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Biomedical imaging modalities
  • Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville, Kentucky
  • Book: Biomedical Image Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022675.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Biomedical imaging modalities
  • Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville, Kentucky
  • Book: Biomedical Image Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022675.006
Available formats
×