Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:04:00.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Segmentation: variational approach

from Part V - Image analysis tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Aly A. Farag
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter deals with image segmentation using the variational and level-set methods discussed in Chapter 10. Over three decades of work in the literature (1960–1990) has been devoted to gradient-based and statistical-based approaches for detection and linking of objects’ boundaries. These approaches have a mixed record of success owing to the ill-posed nature of the problem, and they do not easily adapt to fusion of a priori information about the objects or the imaging sensors. Variational approaches provide an alternative view to purely gradient-based and statistical-based methods. These approaches extract the object boundaries through an energy minimization framework that controls the propagation of a parametric curve or surface (sometimes called a front, as indicated in Chapter 10) inside the objects of interest. Two techniques have been proposed for controlling the curve propagation: active contours (snakes), introduced by Kass, Witkin and Terzopoulos in 1987 [12.1] (see also 12.2],[12.3]), and the level-sets approach, introduced by Osher and Sethian in 1988 [12.4]. At the heart of the active contours and the level-set approaches is an energy formulation that implicitly describes the curve/surface propagation in terms of a set of partial differential equations that can be solved numerically to determine the steady state position of the front. The level-set methods (LSM) have proven to be more efficient and flexible than active contours; the image segmentation algorithms developed in this chapter will be mainly based on the LSM.

As stated in the previous chapter, image segmentation deals with separating objects using the intrinsic information in the image (its intensity statistics, edge information, and other salient characteristics) and whatever known (a priori) shape information is available about the objects in the image (e.g. the kidney shape in the medical images in Figure 12.1). Other than providing a comprehensive survey and comparison of methods, this chapter will augment the theoretical foundation of the curve/surface modeling and propagation covered in Chapter 10 as applied to the segmentation problem.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biomedical Image Analysis
Statistical and Variational Methods
, pp. 316 - 344
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kass, M., Witkin, A. and Terzopoulos, D., Snakes: active contour models. Int. J. Comp. Vis. 1 (1987) 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerney, T. and Terzopoulos, D., Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey. Med. Image Anal. 1(2) (1996) 91–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, C. and Prince, J. L., Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 7(3) (1998) 359–361.Google ScholarPubMed
Osher, S. and Sethian, J., Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on the Hamilton–Jacobi formulation. J. Comp. Phys. 79 (1988) 12–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethian, J. A., Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1999).Google Scholar
Mumford, D. and Shah, J., Boundary detection by minimizing functionals. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Francisco, CA (1985) 22–26.Google Scholar
Chan, T., Sandberg, B. and Vese, L., Active contours without edges for vector valued images. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 2 (2000) 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, T. and Vese, L., A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah model. Int. J. Comp. Vis. 50(3) (2002) 271–293.Google Scholar
Samson, C., Blanc-Féraud, L., Aubert, G. and Zerubia, J., Multiphase Evolution and Variational Image Classification. Technical Report 3662, INRIA, France (1999).Google Scholar
Farag, A. A., Hassan, H., Falk, R. and Hushek, S. G, 3D volume segmentation of MRA data sets using level sets. Acad. J. Radiol. 5 (2004) 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malladi, R., Sethian, J. and Vemuri, B., Shape modeling with front propagation: A level set approach. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. 17(2) (1995) 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventon, M., Grimson, E. and Faugeras, O., Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours’. Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1 (2000) 316–323.Google Scholar
Faugeras, O. and Gomes, J., Dynamic shapes of arbitrary dimension: The vector distance functions. In Proc 9th IMA Conference on the Mathematics of Surfaces, London: Springer (2000) 227–262.Google Scholar
Gomes, J. and Faugeras, O., The vector distance functions. Int. J. Comp. Vis. 52(2–3) (2003) 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousson, M., Paragios, N. and Deriche, R., Implicit active shape models for 3D segmentation in MRI imaging. Proc. Conf. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Part 1, Saint Malo, France (2004) 209–216.Google Scholar
Abd El Munim, H. E. and Farag, A. A., A shape-based segmentation approach: an improved technique using level sets. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision (ICCV), Beijing, China (2005) 930–935.Google Scholar
Abd El Munim, H. E. and Farag, A. A., Curve/surface representation and evolution using vector level sets with application to the shape-based segmentation problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel. 29(6) (2007) 945–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paragios, N., Rousson, M. and Ramesh, V., Matching distance functions: a shape-to-area variational approach for global-to-local registration. Eur. Conf. Computer Vision, Copenhagen, Denmark (2002), Vol. 2, 775–790.Google Scholar
Abd El Munim, H. E. and Farag, A. A., A new global registration approach of medical imaging using vector maps. Proc. Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging, Metro Washington, DC (2007) 584–587.Google Scholar
Cootes, T., Taylor, C., Cooper, D. and Graham, J., Active shape models-their training and application. Comp. Vis. Image Understanding, 61(1) (1995) 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillard, C., Barillot, C. and Bouthemy, P., Robust adaptive segmentation of 3D medical images with level sets. Technical Report, INRIA, France (2000).Google Scholar
Brox, T. and Weickert, J., Level set based image segmentation with multiple regions. Pattern Recog., 3175 (2004) 415–423.Google Scholar
Perona, P. and Malik, J., Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel., 12(7) (1990) 629–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, G., Geometric Partial Differential Equations and Image Analysis. Cambridge University Press (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostis, W. J., Yankelevitz, D. F., Reeves, A. P. et al., Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up. Radiology 231 (2004) 446–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, B., Yankelevitz, D., Reeves, A. and Henschke, C., Two-dimensional multi-criterion segmentation of pulmonary nodules on helical CT images. Med. Phys. 26(6) 1999 889–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, J. P., Rusinek, H., Jacobs, E. L. et al., Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT-phantom study. Radiology 228(3) (2003) 864–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhnigk, J. M., Dicken, V., Bornemann, L. et al., Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(4) (2006) 417–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubota, T., Jerebko, A. K., Dewan, M., Salganicoff, M. and Krishnan, A., Segmentation of pulmonary nodules of various densities with morphological approaches and convexity models. Med. Image Anal. 15(1) (2011) 133–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, D., Lu, L., Bi, J. et al., Stratified learning of local anatomical context for lung nodules in CT images. Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Francisco, California, USA, June, (2010).Google Scholar
Armato, S. G., Giger, M. L., Moran, C. J. et al., Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. J. Radio Graphics 19 (1999) 1303–1311.Google ScholarPubMed
Petrick, N., Kim, H. J., Clunie, D. et al., Comparison of 1D, 2D and 3D nodule sizing methods by radiologists for spherical and complex nodules on thoracic CT phantom images. Acad. Radiol. 21 (2014) 30–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diciotti, S., Lombardo, S., Falchini, M., Picozzi, G. and Mascalchi, M., Automated segmentation refinement of small lung nodules in CT scans by local shape analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58(12) (2011) 3418–3428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diciotti, S., Picozzi, G., Falchini, M. et al., 3-D segmentation algorithm of small lung nodules in spiral CT images. IEEE Trans. Information Technol. Biomed. 12(1) (2008)7–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farag, A., Graham, J. and Farag, A., Robust segmentation of lung tissue in chest CT Scanning. Proc. 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP) (2010) 2249–2252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farag, A. A., Modeling small objects under uncertainties: novel algorithms and applications. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Louisville, CVIP Lab, 2012.
ELCAP public lung image database. .
Armato, G., McLennan, G., McNitt-Gray, M. F., et al., Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community, Radiology 232(3) (2004) 739–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farag, A. A., A variational approach for small-size lung nodule segmentation, Proc. ISBI’13, San Francisco, CA (2013) 81–84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×