Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T08:58:40.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

C. K. Catchpole
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
P. J. B. Slater
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Bird Song
Biological Themes and Variations
, pp. 281 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adhikerana, A. S. 1992. The singing behaviour of coal tits (Parus ater). Ph.D. thesis, University of St Andrews.
Adhikerana, A. S. & Slater, P. J. B. 1993. Singing interactions in coal tits, Parus ater: An experimental approach. Anim. Behav., 46, 1205–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adret, P. 1993. Operant conditioning, song learning and imprinting to taped song in the zebra finch. Anim. Behav., 46, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adret-Hausberger, M. 1983. Variations dialectales des sifflements de l'Etourneau sansonnet (Sturnus vulgaris) sedentaire en Bretagne. Z. Tierpsychol., 62, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adret-Hausberger, M. 1989. The species-repertoire of whistled songs in the European starling: species-specific characteristics and variability. Bioacoustics, 2, 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adret-Hausberger, M. & Güttinger, H. R. 1984. Constancy of basic pattern in the songs of two populations of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). A comparison of song variation between sedentary and migratory populations. Z. Tierpsychol., 66, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adret-Hausberger, M. & Jenkins, P. F. 1988. Complex organisation of the warbling song in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris. Behaviour, 107, 138–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agate, R. J., Grisham, W., Wade, J., Mann, S., Wingfield, J., Schanen, C., Palotie, A. & Arnold, A. P. 2003. Neural, not gonadal, origin of brain sex differences in a gynandromorphic finch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 4873–4878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Airey, D. C., Buchanan, K. L., Catchpole, C. K., Szekely, T. & DeVoogd, T. J. 2000a. Song, sexual selection and a song control nucleus (HVC) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J. Neurobiol., 44, 1–6.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airey, D. C., Castillo-Juarez, H., Casella, G., Pollak, E. J. & DeVoogd, T. J. 2000b. Variation in the volume of zebra finch song control nuclei is heritable: developmental and evolutionary implications. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 267, 2099–2104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Airey, D. C. & DeVoogd, T. J. 2000. Greater song complexity is associated with augmented song system anatomy in zebra finches. NeuroReport, 11, 2339–2344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A. & Glynn, C. 1990. Singing rate and female attraction in the pied flycatcher: an experiment. Anim. Behav., 39, 601–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J. 1989. Animal Behaviour: An Evolutionary Approach. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Borda, B., Haripal, B. & Nottebohm, F. 2004. Timing of brain-derived neurotrophic factor exposure affects life expectancy of new neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 3957–3961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez-Buylla, A., Kirn, J. R. & Nottebohm, F. 1990. Birth of projection neurons in adult avian brain may be related to perceptual or motor learning. Science, 249, 1444–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez-Buylla, A. & Nottebohm, F. 1988. Migration of young neurons in adult avian brain. Nature, 335, 353–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez-Buylla, B. & Nottebohm, F. 2002. Gonads and singing play separate, additive roles in new neuron recruitment in adult canary brains. J. Neurosci., 22, 8684–8690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Buylla, A., Theelen, M. & Nottebohm, F. 1988. Birth of projection neurons in the higher vocal center of the canary forebrain before, during and after song learning. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 8722–8726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amrhein, V. & Erne, N. 2006. Dawn singing reflects past territorial challenges in the winter wren. Anim. Behav., 71, 1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrhein, V., Kunc, H. P. & Naguib, M. 2004. Non-territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.), 271, S167–S169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcese, P., Stoddard, P. K. & Hiebert, S. M. 1988. The form and function of song in female song sparrows. Condor, 90, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. E. & Conner, R. N. 1985. Cardinal song in three forest habitats in Eastern Texas. Wilson Bull., 97, 436–449.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Searcy, W. A. & Nowicki, S. 2005. Partial song matching in an eastern population of song sparrows, Melospiza melodia. Anim. Behav., 69, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Andrew, R. J. 1962. Evolution of intelligence and vocal mimicking. Science, 137, 585–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, E. A. 1973. A Study of Bird Song. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. P. 1975. The effects of castration and androgen replacement on song, courtship and aggression in zebra finches Poephila guttata. J. Exp. Zool., 191, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, A. P. 1990. The passerine bird song system as a model in neuroendocrine research. J. Exp. Zool. Suppl., 4, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubin, T. & Jouventin, P. 1998. Cocktail-party effect in king penguin colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 265, 1665–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, M. & Oring, L. W. 1977. Song dialects in the bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus). Condor, 79, 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylor, D. 1972. Sound transmission through vegetation in relation to leaf area density, leaf width, and breadth of canopy. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 51, 411–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badyaev, A. V. & Leaf, E. S. 1997. Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk, 114, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. 1974. Genetic structure of two populations of white-crowned sparrows with different song dialects. Condor, 76, 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. 1975. Song dialects and genetic differences in white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys). Evolution, 29, 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. 1982. Vocal dialect recognition and population genetic consequences. Am. Zool., 22, 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. 1996. Depauperate meme pool of vocal signals in an island population of singing honeyeaters. Anim. Behav., 51, 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C., Baker, E. M. & Baker, M. S. A. 2001. Island and island-like effects on vocal repertoire of singing honeyeaters. Anim. Behav., 62, 767–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C., Bjerke, T., Lampe, H. & Espmark, Y. 1986. Sexual response of female great tits to variation in size of males song repertoire. Am. Nat., 128, 491–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. & Boylan, J. T. 1995. A catalog of song syllables of indigo and lazuli buntings. Condor, 97, 1028–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. & Cunningham, M. A. 1985. The biology of bird-song dialects. Behav. Brain Sci., 8, 85–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. & Mewaldt, L. R. 1978. Song dialects as barriers to dispersal in white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys nuttalli). Evolution, 32, 712–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C., Spitler-Nabors, K. J. & Bradley, D. C. 1981. Early experience determines song dialect responsiveness of female sparrows. Science, 214, 819–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, M. C., Spitler-Nabors, K. J. & Bradley, D. C. 1982. The response of female mountain white-crowned sparrows to songs from their natal dialect and an alien dialect. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 10, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C., Spitler-Nabors, K. J., Thompson, A. D. & Cunningham, M. A. 1987. Reproductive behaviour of female white-crowned sparrows: effect of dialects and synthetic hybrid songs. Anim. Behav., 35, 1766–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. & Thompson, D. B. 1985. Song dialects of white-crowned sparrows: historical processes inferred from patterns of geographic variation. Condor, 87, 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaban, E. 1988a. Cultural and genetic variation in swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana) I. Song variation, genetic variation, and their relationship. Behaviour, 105, 250–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaban, E. 1988b. Cultural and genetic variation in swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana) II. Behavioural salience of geographic song variants. Behaviour, 105, 292–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, G. F. 1999. The neuroendocrine basis of seasonal changes in vocal behavior among songbirds. In The Design of Animal Communication (ed. Hauser, M. D & Konishi, M), pp. 213–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ball, G. F., Auger, C. J., Bernard, D. J. et al. 2004. Seasonal plasticity in the song control system. Multiple brain sites of steroid hormone action and the importance of the variation in song behavior. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci., 1016, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, G. F. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2001. Sex differences in songbirds 25 years later: what have we learned and where do we go?Microsc. Res. Tech., 54, 327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, G. F., Riters, L. V. & Balthazart, J. 2002. Neuroendocrinology of song behavior and avian brain plasticity: multiple sites of sex steroid hormones. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 23, 137–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballentine, B., Hyman, J. & Nowicki, S. 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol., 15, 163–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. 1975. Song dialects and demes in sedentary populations of the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys nuttalli). Publ. Zool. Univ. Calif., 105, 1–52.Google Scholar
Baptista, L. F. 1977. Geographic variation in song and dialects of the Puget Sound white-crowned sparrow. Condor, 79, 356–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. 1978. Territorial, courtship and duet songs of the Cuban grassquit (Tiaris canora). J. Ornithol., 119, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. 1988. Imitations of white-crowned sparrow songs by a song sparrow. Condor, 90, 486–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. 1990. Dialectal variation in the raincall of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs). Die Vogelwarte, 35, 249–56.Google Scholar
Baptista, L. F. 1996. Nature and its nurturing in avian vocal development. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 39–60. Ithaca, NY, and London: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Catchpole, C. K. 1989. Vocal mimicry and interspecific aggression in songbirds: Experiments using white-crowned sparrow imitation of song sparrow song. Behaviour, 109, 247–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Morton, M. L. 1981. Interspecific song acquisition by a white-crowned sparrow. Auk, 98, 383–5.Google Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Morton, M. L. 1982. Song dialects and mate selection in montane white-crowned sparrows. Auk, 99, 537–47.Google Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Morton, M. L. 1988. Song learning in montane white-crowned sparrows: from whom and when?Anim. Behav., 36, 1753–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Petrinovich, L. 1984. Social interaction, sensitive phases and the song template hypothesis in the white-crowned sparrow. Anim. Behav., 32, 172–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Petrinovich, L. 1986. Song development in the white-crowned sparrow: social factors and sex differences. Anim. Behav., 34, 1359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Schuchmann, K.-L. 1990. Song learning in the Anna hummingbird (Calypte anna). Ethology, 84, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F. & Trail, P. W. 1992. The role of song in the evolution of passerine diversity. Syst. Biol., 41, 242–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, L. F., Trail, P. W., DeWolfe, B. B. & Morton, M. L. 1993. Singing and its functions in female white-crowned sparrows. Anim. Behav., 46, 511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrington, D. 1773. Experiments and observations on the singing of birds. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 63, 249–91.Google Scholar
Bartlett, P. & Slater, P. J. B. 1999. The effect of new recruits on the flock specific call of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 11, 139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, J. R. 1982. Avian vocal mimicry: its function and evolution. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 51–83. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Becker, P. H. 1978. Der Einfluss des Lernens auf einfache und komplexe Gesangsstrophen der Sumpfmeise (Parus palustris). J. Orn., 119, 388–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, P. H. 1982. The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds, vol. 1 (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 213–52. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beebee, M. D. 2002. Song sharing by yellow warblers differs between two modes of singing: implications for song function. Condor, 104, 146–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, M. D. 2004. The functions of multiple singing modes: experimental tests in yellow warblers, Dendroica petechia. Anim. Behav., 67, 1089–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, M. D. 1982. Development of parent-offspring recognition in birds. In: Experiential Factors in Perceptual Development. (ed. Aslin, R. K, Alberts, J. R & Petusa, M. R), pp. 45–66. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beecher, M. D. 1990. Evolution of parent-offspring recognition in swallows. In: Contemporary Issues in Comparative Psychology (ed. Dewsbury, D. A), pp. 360–380. Sundenand, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Beecher, M. D., Beecher, I. M. & Hahn, S. 1981. Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows Riparia riparia: Development and acoustic basis. Anim. Behav., 29, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, M. D. & Brenowitz, E. A. 2005. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 143–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecher, M. D. & Campbell, S. E. 2005. The role of unshared songs in singing interactions between neighbouring song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 70, 1297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E. & Burt, J. M. 1994a. Song perception in the song sparrow: birds classify by song type but not by singer. Anim. Behav., 47, 1343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E., Burt, J. M., Hill, C. E. & Nordby, J. C. 2000a. Song-type matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 59, 21–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E. & Nordby, J. C. 2000b. Territory tenure in song sparrows is related to song sharing with neighbours, but not to repertoire size. Anim. Behav., 59, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E. & Stoddard, P. K. 1994b. Correlation of song learning and territory establishment strategies in the song sparrow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 1450–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecher, M. D., Stoddard, P. K., Campbell, S. E. & Horning, C. L. 1996. Repertoire matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 51, 917–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, C. G. 1969. Laughing gull chicks: recognition of their parents voices. Science, 166, 1030–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. 1982. Vocal behavior of the Northern oriole. Wilson Bull., 94, 372–81.Google Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. 1983a. Aggressive and pair-bond maintenance songs of female red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Z. Tierpsychol., 62, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. 1983b. Aggressive responses to ‘self’ songs by female red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Can. J. Zool., 61, 462–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. 1983c. Vocal mate recognition in male red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Behaviour, 84, 124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. 1983d. An investigation of vocal recognition by voice in female red-winged blackbirds. Anim. Behav., 31, 355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. 1985. Intersexual song answering in red-winged blackbirds. Can. J. Zool., 63, 735–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. 1989. Communication and the cadence of bird song. Am. Midl. Nat., 122, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beletsky, L. D. & Orians, G. H. 1985. Nest-associated vocalizations of female red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Z. Tierpsychol., 69, 329–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. D., Borowiec, M., McConkey, K. R. & Ranoszek, E. 1997. Settlement, breeding success and song repertoires of monogamous and polygynous sedge warblers (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus). Die Vogelwarte 39, 87–94.Google Scholar
Bensch, S. & Hasselquist, D. 1992. Evidence for female choice in a polygynous warbler. Anim. Behav., 44, 301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, K. S., Brumfield, R. T. & Apanius, V. 2005. Phylogenetic and ecological determinants of the neotropical dawn chorus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 273, 999–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, G. 1980. Die Veränderung der Gesangmelodie der Kohlmeise Parus major in Finnland und Schweden. Ornis Fenn., 57, 97–111.Google Scholar
Bergmann, H.-H., Flottmann, E., Heitkamp, W., Stehn-Nix, K.-P. & Ubozak, F. 1988. Die Osnabrücker Dialektkarte von Regenrufen des Buchfinken Fringilla coelebs im Jahre 1987. Vogelk. Ber. Nieders., 20, 89–96.Google Scholar
Bernard, D. J., Eens, M. & Ball, G. F. 1996. Age- and behavior-related variation in volumes of song control nuclei in male European starlings. J. Neurobiol., 30, 329–39.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertram, B. 1970. The vocal behaviour of the Indian hill mynah. Anim. Behav. Monogr., 3, 81–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezzel, E. 1988. Die Gesangzeiten desBuchfinken (Fringilla coelebs): eineRegionalstudie. J. Orn., 129, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, T. R., Buchanan, K. L., DeVoogd, T. J., et al. 1997. Song, sperm quality and testes asymmetry in the sedgewarbler. Anim. Behav., 53, 965–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, T. R. & Møller, A. P. 1992. Sperm Competition in Birds. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bitterbaum, E. & Baptista, L. F. 1979. Geographicalvariation in songs of California house finches (Carpodacusmexicanus). Auk, 96, 462–74.Google Scholar
Bjerke, T. K. & Bjerke, T. H. 1981. Songdialects in the redwing, Turdus iliacus. Ornis Scand., 12, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerke, T. K. 1980. Continuityand change in dialect structure of redwing Turdusiliacus. Fauna norv. Ser. C Cinclus, 3, 73–9.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, M. 1989. Microgeographicvariation in the song of the scarlet rosefinch Carpodacuserythrinus. Ornis Scand., 20, 255–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, M., Westman, B. & Allander, K. 1989. Song in Swedish great tits: intra- or intersexualcommunication. Behaviour, 111, 257–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühner, J. 1983. Songlearning in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata):selectivity in the choice of a tutor and accuracy of song copies. Anim. Behav., 31, 231–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolhuis, J. J. & Eda-Fujiwara, H. 2003. Bird brains and songs:neural mechanisms of birdsong perception and memory. Anim. Biol., 53, 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolhuis, J. J. & Gahr, M. 2006. Neural mechanisms ofbirdsong memory. Nature Reviews Neurosci., 7, 347–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borror, D. J. 1981. The songsand singing behavior of the red-eyed vireo. Condor, 83, 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borror, D. J. 1987. Song inthe white-eyed vireo. Wilson Bull., 99, 377–97.Google Scholar
Boseret, G., Carere, C., Ball, G. F. & Balthazart, J. 2005. Socialcontext affects testosterone-induced singing and the volume of song controlnuclei in male canaries Serinus canaria. J. Neurobiol., 66, 1044–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottjer, S. W., Miesner, E. A. & Arnold, A. P. 1984. Forebrain lesionsdisrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. Science, 224, 901–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boughey, M. J. & Thompson, N. S. 1981. Songvariety in the Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum). Z. Tierpsychol., 56, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackenbury, J. H. 1980. Respirationand production of sounds by birds. Biol. Rev., 55, 363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackenbury, J. H. 1982. The structural basis of voice production and its relationship to sound characteristics. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds, vol. 1 (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 214–52. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brackenbury, J. H. 1989. Functions of the syrinx and the control of sound production. In: Form and Function in Birds, (ed. King, A. S & McLelland, J), pp. 193–220. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. A. 1981. Songvariation in a population of white-eyed vireos (Vireogriseus). Auk, 98, 80–7.Google Scholar
Brainard, M. S. & Doupe, A. J. 2000. Auditoryfeedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour. NatureReviews, 1, 31–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Brainard, M. S. & Doupe, A. J. 2002. What songbirds teach usabout learning. Nature, 417, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breitwisch, R. & Whitesides, G. H. 1987. Directionalityof singing and non-singing behaviour of mated and unmated northernmockingbirds, Mimus polyglottos. Anim. Behav., 35, 331–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brémond, J.-C. 1968. Recherches sur lasemantique et les elements vecteurs d'information dans les signaux acoustiquesdu rouge-gorge Erithacus rubecula. La Terre et la Vie, 2, 109–220.Google Scholar
Brémond, J.-C. 1976. Specific recognition in the songof Bonelli's warbler Phylloscopus bonelli. Behaviour, 58, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brémond, J.-C. 1978. Acousticcompetition between the songs of the wren (Troglodytestroglodytes) and the songs of other species. Behaviour, 65, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenowitz, E. A. 1982a. Theactive space of red-winged blackbird song. J. comp. Physiol., 147, 511–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenowitz, E. A. 1982b. Aggressiveresponse of red-winged blackbirds to mockingbird song imitation. Auk, 99, 584–6.Google Scholar
Brenowitz, E. A. 1991a. Evolutionof the vocal control system in the avian brain. Seminarsin the Neurosciences, 3, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenowitz, E. A. 1991b. Alteredperception of species-specific song by birds after lesions of a forebrainnucleus. Science, 251, 303–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenowitz, E. A. & Arnold, A. P. 1986. Interspecificcomparisons of the size of neural song control regions and song complexity in duetting birds: evolutionary implications. J. Neurosci., 6, 2875–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenowitz, E. A., Nalls, B., Wingfield, J. C. & Kroodsma, D. E. 1991. Seasonal changes in avian song nuclei without seasonalchanges in song repertoire. J. Neurosci., 11, 1367–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brindley, E. L. 1991. Responseof European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping. Anim. Behav., 41, 503–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockway, B. F. 1965. Stimulationof ovarian development and egg-laying by male courtship vocalizations inbudgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus. Anim. Behav., 13, 575–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, M.L. 1978. Sexual differences inthe voice and individual vocal recognition in the manx shearwater Puffinuspuffinus. Anim. Behav., 26, 622–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. J. & Falls, J. B. 1975a. Individual recognitionby song in white-throated sparrows. I. Can. J. Zool., 53, 879–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. J. & Falls, J. B. 1975b. Individual recognitionby song in white-throated sparrows. III. Can. J. Zool., 53, 1749–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. H. 1982. Ventroloquialand locatable vocalizations in birds. Z. Tierpsychol., 59, 338–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. D. & Farabaugh, S. M. 1991. Songsharing in a group-living songbird, the Australian magpie, Gymnorhinatibicen. Part III. Sex specificity and individual specificity of vocalparts in communal chorus and duet songs. Behaviour, 118, 244–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. D., Farabaugh, S. M. & Veltman, C. J. 1988. Song sharing in a group-livingsongbird, the Australian magpie, Gymnorhinatibicen Part I. Vocal sharing within and among social groups. Behaviour, 104, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. N. & Lemon, R. E. 1979. Structure and evolutionof song form in the wrens Thryothorus sinaloaand T. felix. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 5, 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. J. & Handford, P. 2003. Why birds sing at dawn:the role of consistent sound transmission. Ibis, 145, 120–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumm, H. 2004. The impact ofenvironmental noise on song amplitude in a terrirorial bird. J. Anim. Ecol., 73, 434–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumm, H. 2006. Signalling throughacoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-termadjustment of song timing. J. comp. Physiol. A, 192, 1279–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brumm, H. & Slabbekoorn, H. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Adv. Study Behav., 35, 151–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumm, H. & Slater, P. J. B. 2006a. Ambient noise, motor fatigue andserial redundancy in chaffinch song. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 60, 475–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumm, H. & Slater, P. J. B. 2006b. Animalscan vary signal amplitude with receiver distance: evidence from zebra finch song. Anim. Behav., 71, 699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumm, H. & Todt, D. 2002. Noise-dependent song amplituderegulation in a territorial songbird. Anim. Behav., 63, 891–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumm, H. & Todt, D. 2003. Facing the rival: directionalsinging behaviour in nightingales. Behaviour, 140, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, K. L. & Catchpole, C. K. 1997. Femalechoice in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalusschoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 264, 521–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, K. L. & Catchpole, C K. 2000a. Extra-pair paternityin the socially monogamous sedge warbler (Acrocephalusschoenobaenus) as revealed by multilocus DNA fingerprinting. Ibis, 142, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, K. L. & Catchpole, C. K. 2000b. Song asan indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 267, 321–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, K. L., Catchpole, C. K., Lewis, J. W. & Lodge, A. 1999. Song as an indicator of parasitismin the sedge warbler. Anim. Behav., 57, 307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, K. L., Leitner, S., Spencer, K. A., Goldsmith, A. R. & Catchpole, C. K. 2004. Developmental stress selectivelyaffects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 271, 2381–2386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, K. L., Spencer, K. A., Goldsmith, A. R. & Catchpole, C. K. 2003. Song as an honest signal of pastdevelopmental stress in the European starling (Sturnusvulgaris). Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 270, 1149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burd, G. D. & Nottebohm, F. 1985. Ultrastructural characterizationof synaptic terminals formed on newly generated neurons in a song controlnucleus of the adult canary forebrain. J. comp. Neurol., 240, 143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnell, K. 1998. Cultural variation insavannah sparrow, Passerculus sandwichensis, songs: an analysis using the meme concept. Anim. Behav., 56, 995–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, J. M., Bard, S. C., Campbell, S. E. & Beecher, M. D. 2002a. Alternative forms of song matching in song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 63, 1143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, J. M., Campbell, S. E. & Beecher, M. D. 2002b. Song type matching as threat: atest using interactive playback. Anim. Behav., 62, 1163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, J. M., Lent, K. L., Beecher, M. D. & Brenowitz, E.A. 2000. Lesions of the anterior forebrain song control pathway infemale canaries affect song perception in an operant task. J. Neurobiol., 42, 1–13.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, J. M. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 2005. Dawn chorus as an interactive communication network. In: Animal Communication Networks (ed by McGregor, P), pp. 320–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byers, B. E. 1995. Songtypes, repertoires and song variability in a population of chestnut-sidedwarblers. Condor, 97, 390–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, B. E. 1996a. Geographicvariation of song form within and among chestnut-sided warbler populations. Auk, 113, 288–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, B. E. 1996b. Messagesencoded in the songs of chestnut-sided warblers. Anim. Behav., 52, 691–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, W.A. 1970. Respiration during songin the canary (Serinus canaria). Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 32, 251–8.Google Scholar
Canady, R. A., Kroodsma, D. E. & Nottebohm, F. 1984. Population differencesin complexity of a learned skill are correlated with the brain space involved. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 81, 6232–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capp, M. S. 1992. Tests ofthe function of the song repertoire in bobolinks. Condor, 94, 468–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capp, M. S. & Searcy, W. A. 1991. An experimental studyof song type function in the bobolink (Dolichonyxoryzivorus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1973. Thefunctions of advertising song in the sedge warbler Acrocephalusschoenobaenus and the reed warblerA. scirpaceus. Behaviour, 46, 300–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1976. Temporaland sequential organisation of song in the sedge warbler (Acrocephalusschoenobaenus). Behaviour, 59, 226–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1978. Interspecificterritorialism and competition in Acrocephaluswarblers as revealed by playback experiments in areas of sympatry and allopatry. Anim. Behav., 26, 1072–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1979. Vocal Communicationin Birds. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1980. Sexualselection and the evolution of complex songs among warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour, 74, 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1982. The evolution of bird sounds in relation to mating and spacing behavior. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed.Kroodsma, D ' Miller, E. H), pp. 297–319. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1983. Variationin the song of the great reed warbler Acrocephalusarundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defence. Anim. Behav., 31, 1217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1986. Songrepertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalusarundinaceus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19, 439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1987. Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. TrendsEcol. Evol., 2, 94–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catchpole, C. K. 1989. Pseudoreplicatonand external validity: some thoughts on the suggested redesign of playbackexperiments in avian bioacoustics. TrendsEcol. Evol., 4, 286–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 1992. Integrating playback: a wider context. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (ed. McGregor, P. K), pp. 35–46. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. 2000. Sexualselection and the evolution of song and brain structure in Acrocephaluswarblers. Adv. Study Behav., 29, 45–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. & Baptista, L. F. 1988. Atest of the competition hypothesis of vocal mimicry, using song sparrowimitation of white-crowned sparrow song. Behaviour, 106, 119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K., Dittami, J. & Leisler, B. 1984. Differential responses to malesong repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestradiol. Nature, 312, 563–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. & Komdeur, J. 1993. The song of theSeychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis, an island endemic. Ibis, 135, 190–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. & Leisler, B. 1986. Interspecificterritorialism in reed warblers: a local effect revealed by playback experiments. Anim. Behav., 34, 299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. & Leisler, B. 1989. Variation in the songof the aquatic warbler Acrocephalus paludicolain response to playback of different song structures. Behaviour, 108, 125–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K., Leisler, B. & Dittami, J. 1986. Sexual differences in theresponses of captive great reed warblers Acrocephalusarundinaceus, to variation in song structure and size. Ethology, 73, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. & McGregor, P. K. 1985. Sexualselection, song complexity and plumage dimorphism in European buntings of thegenus EmberizaAnim. Behav., 33, 1378–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. & Rowell, A. 1993. Song sharing and localdialects in a population of the European wren Troglodytestroglodytes. Behaviour, 125, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappuis, C. 1971. Un example del'influence du milieu sur les émissions vocales des oiseaux: L'évolution deschants en forêt équatoriale. Terre et Vie, 25, 183–202.Google Scholar
Chatfield, C. ' Lemon, R. E. 1970. Analysing sequences of behaviouralevents. J. theor. Biol, 29, 427–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, G. & Lein, M. R. 1996. Long-termchanges in songs and song dialect boundaries of Puget sound white-crownedsparrows. Condor, 98, 567–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, G., Lein, M. R. & Baptista, L. F. 1990. Matechoice by female white-crowned sparrows in a mixed dialect population. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 27, 223–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, G., Wiebe, M. O. & Handford, P. 2002. Large scale geographic variation in songs of Gambel'swhite-crowned sparrows. Condor, 104, 378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. J., Boersma, P. D. & Olmsted, D. M. 2006. Name that tune: calldiscrimination and individual recognition in Magellanic penguins. Anim. Behav., 72, 1141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, N. S. 1987. Song tutorchoice in zebra finches. Anim. Behav., 35, 714–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, N. S. 1988. Songdiscrimination learning in zebra finches. Anim. Behav., 36, 1016–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, N. S. 1990a. Subspeciesrecognition and song learning in zebra finches. Anim. Behav., 40, 1009–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, N. S. 1990b. Assortativemating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygiaguttata guttata and T. g. castanotis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 330, 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, M. L. & Brown, J. H. 1969. Songasynchrony in neighbouring bird species. Nature, 222, 778–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, R. B., Lewis, D. B., Hill, K. G., Hutchings, M. E. & Gower, D. M. 1980. Directional hearing in the Japanese quail (Coturnixcoturnix japonica). II. Cochlear physiology. J. exp. Biol., 86, 153–70.Google Scholar
Collins, S. 2004. Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P ' Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 42–82. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cooney, R. & Cockburn, A. 1995. Territorial defence isthe major function of female song in the superb fairy-wren, Maluruscyaneus. Anim. Behav. 49, 1635–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, B. G. & Goller, F. 2004. Multimodal signals:enhancement and constraint of song motor patterns by visual display. Science, 303, 544–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortopassi, K. A. & Bradbury, J. W. 2000. Thecomparison of harmonically rich sounds using spectrographic cross-correlationand principal coordinates analysis. Bioacoustics, 111, 89–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosens, S. E. & Falls, J. B. 1984a. A comparison of soundpropagation and song frequency in temperate marsh and grassland habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 15, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosens, S. E. & Falls, J. B. 1984b. Structure and use ofsong in the yellow-headed blackbird (Xanthocephalusxanthocephalus). Z. Tierpsychol., 66, 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W. 1943. The song of the woodpewee Myiochanes virens Linnaeus: Astudy of bird music. N.Y. State Mus. Bull., 334, 1–186.Google Scholar
Cresswell, W. 1994. Song as a pursuitdeterrent signal, and its occurrence relative to other anti-predator behavioursof skylarks (Alauda arvensis) on attackby merlins (Falco columbarius). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 34, 217–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, M. A. & Baker, M. C. 1983. Vocal learning inwhite-crowned sparrows: sensitive phase and song dialects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 13, 259–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthill, I. C. & Hindmarsh, A. 1985. Increase in starlingsong activity with removal of mate. Anim. Behav., 33, 326–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthill, I. C. & Macdonald, W. A. 1990. Experimentalmanipulation of the dawn and dusk chorus in the blackbird Turdusmerula. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26, 209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cynx, J., Lewis, R., Tavel, B. ', Tse, H. 1998. Amplituderegulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygiaguttata. Anim. Behav., 56, 107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cynx, J., Williams, H. & Nottebohm, F. 1992. Hemispheric differences in avian song discrimination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 1372–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dabelsteen, T. 1992. Interactive playback: a finely tuned response. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (ed.McGregor, P. K), pp. 97–110. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Dabelsteen, T., Larsen, O. N. & Pedersen, S. B. 1993. Habitat-induced degradation ofsound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and birdlocation of blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio inblackbird song. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 93, 2206–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabelsteen, T. & McGregor, P. K. 1996. Dynamic acoustic communication and interactive playback. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E ' Miller, E. H), pp. 398–408. Ithaca, NY, and London: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Dabelsteen, T. & Pederson, S. 1990. Song and aggressiveresponses of blackbirds, Turdus merula:evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. Anim. Behav. 40, 1158–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S. B. 1991. A portable digital sound emitterfor interactive playback of animal vocalisations. Bioacoustics, 3, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S. B. 1993. Song-based species discriminationand behaviour assessment by female blackbirds, Turdusmerula. Anim. Behav., 45, 759–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, S., Amundsen, T., Lifjelt, J. T. & Slagsvold, T. 1990. Matesampling behaviour of female pied flycatchers: evidence for active mate choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 27, 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, S., Rinden, H. & Slagsvold, T. 1992. Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female piedflycatchers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 30, 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Date, E. M. & Lemon, R. E. 1993. Soundtransmission: a basis for dialects in birdsong?Behaviour, 124, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dave, A. & Margoliash, D. 2000. Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning. Science, 290, 812–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, N. B., Kilner, R. M. & Noble, D. G. 1998. Nestling cuckoos Cuculuscanorus exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 265, 673–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. & Guilford, T. 1991. The corruption ofhonest signalling. Anim. Behav., 41, 865–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, S. M. & Jenkins, P. F. 1983. Chaffinch songrepertoires and the Beau Geste hypothesis. Behaviour, 87, 256–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deecke, V. B., Ford, J. K. B. & Spong, P. 1999. Quantifying complex patterns ofbioacoustic variation: use of a neural network to compare killer whale (Orcinusorca) dialects. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 105, 2499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kort, S. R. & ten Cate, C. 2001. Response tointerspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of relatedness in Streptopeliadoves. Anim. Behav., 61, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
delNegro, C., Gahr, M., Leboucher, G. & Kreutzer, M. 1998. The selectivity of sexualresponses to song displays: effects of partial chemical lesion of HVC in femalecanaries. Behav. Brain Res., 96, 151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
delNegro, C., Kreutzer, M. & Gahr, M. 2000. Sexual stimulatingsignals of canary (Serinus canaria)songs: evidence for a female-specific auditory representation in the HVCnucleus during the breeding season. Behav. Neurosci., 114, 526–42.Google Scholar
Depraz, V., Leboucher, G. & Kreutzer, M. 2000. Early tutoring and adult reproductive behaviour in femaledomestic canary (Serinus canaria). Anim. Cogn., 3, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derégnaucourt, S., Mitra, P. P., Fehér, O., Pytte, CTchernichovski, O. 2005. Howsleep affects the developmental learning of bird song. Nature, 433, 710–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeVoogd., T. J. 1991. Endocrinemodulation of the development and adult function of the avian song system. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16, 41–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeVoogd, T. J., Krebs, J. R., Healy, S. D. & Purvis, A. 1993. Relations between song repertoire size and the volume ofbrain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscinebirds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 254, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWolfe, B. B., Baptista, L. F. & Petrinovich, L. 1989. Song development andterritory establishment in Nuttall's white-crowned sparrows. Condor, 91, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWolfe, B. B., Kaska, D. D. & Peyton, L. J. 1974. Prominent variations in the songsof Gambel's white-crowned sparrows. Bird Banding, 45, 224–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilger, W. C. 1953. Duettingin the crimson-breasted barbet. Condor, 55, 220–1.Google Scholar
Dobkin, D. S. 1979. Functionaland evolutionary relationships of vocal copying phenomena in birds. Z. Tierpsychol., 50, 348–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, C. W. & Lemon, R. E. 1975. Re-examination of themonotony-threshold hypothesis in bird song. Nature, 257, 126–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, C. W. & Lemon, R. E. 1979. Markov sequences insongs of American thrushes. Behaviour, 68, 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooling, R. 2004. Audition: can birds hear everything they sing? In Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P ' Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 209–28. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Doupe, A. J. & Konishi, M. 1991. Song-selective auditorycircuits in the vocal control system of the zebra finch. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 11339–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doupe, A. J. & Kuhl, P. K. 1999. Birdsong and humanspeech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 22, 567–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doutrelant, C., Aubin, T., Hitier, S. & Lambrechts, M. M. 1998. Twodistinct song populations of blue tit Paruscaeruleus in the French Mediterranean. Bioacoustics, 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doutrelant, C. & Lambrechts, M. M. 2001. Macrogeographicvariation in song a test of competition and habitat effects in blue tits. Ethology, 107, 533–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowsett-Lemaire, F. 1979. Theimitative range of the song of the marsh warbler Acrocephaluspalustris, with special reference to imitations of African birds. Ibis, 121, 453–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draganoiu, T. I., Nagle, L., Musseau, R. & Kreutzer, M. 2006. In a songbird, the black redstart, parents use acousticcues to discriminate between their different fledglings. Anim. Behav., 71, 1039–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, D. L. & Ball, G. F. 2002. Song predictsimmunocompetence in male European starlings (Sturnusvulgaris). Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 269, 847–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufty, A. M. 1985. Songsharing in the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrusater). Z. Tierpsychol., 69, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussourd, N. & Ritchison, G. 2003. Singing behavior of maleyellow-breasted chats: repertoires, rates, reproductive success, and acomparison with other wood-warblers. WilsonBull., 115, 52–7.Google Scholar
Eales, L. A. 1985. Songlearning in zebra finches: Some effects of song model availability on what islearnt and when. Anim. Behav., 33, 1293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, L. A. 1989. Theinfluences of visual and vocal interaction on song learning in zebra finches. Anim. Behav., 37, 507–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, L. S. 1994. Oxygen consumption during singing by male Carolina wrens (Thryothorusludovicianus). Auk, 111, 124–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eens, M. 1997. Understandingthe complex song of the European starling: an integrated ethological approach. Adv. Study Behav., 26, 355–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eens, M., Pinxten, R. & Verheyen, R. F. 1989. Temporal and sequential organisation of song bouts in the starling. Ardea, 77, 75–86.Google Scholar
Eens, M., Pinxten, R. & Verheyen, R. F. 1990. On the function of singing andwing-waving in the European starling Sturnusvulgaris L. Bird Study, 37, 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eens, M., Pinxten, R. & Verheyen, R. F. 1991a. Male song as a cue for mate choice in the European starling. Behaviour, 116, 210–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eens, M., Pinxten, R. & Verheyen, R. F. 1991b. Organisation of song in the European starling: species specificity and individual differences. Belg. J. Zool., 121, 257–78.Google Scholar
Eens, M., Pinxten, R. & Verheyen, R. F. 1992. Song learning in captive European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim. Behav., 44, 1131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eens, M., Pinxten, R. & Verheyen, R. F. 1993. Function of the song and song repertoire in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): an aviary experiment. Behaviour, 125, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellinger, N. & Hödl, W. 2003. Habitat acoustics of a neotropical lowland rainforest. Bioacoustics, 13, 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S.T. 1972. An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour, 41, 130–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S. T., Rising, J. D. & Thompson, W. L. 1975. A behavioural and morphological study of sympatry in the indigo and lazuli buntings of the great plains. Wilson Bull., 87, 145–302.Google Scholar
Eriksson, D. & Wallin, L. 1986. Male bird song attracts females - a field experiment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19, 297–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espmark, Y. 1982. Microgeographical and individual variation in the morphology of song of the redwing Turdus iliacus. Fauna norv. ser. C Cinclus, 5, 73–83.Google Scholar
Espmark, Y. 1995. Individual and local variations in the song of the snow bunting Plectrophenax nivalis on Spitzbergen. Bioacoustics, 6, 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espmark, Y. O. & Lampe, H. M. 1993. Variations in the song of the pied flycatcher within and between breeding seasons. Bioacoustics, 5, 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espmark, Y. O., Lampe, H. M. & Bjerke, T. K. 1989. Song conformity and continuity in song dialects of redwings Turdus iliacus and some ecological correlates. Ornis Scand., 20, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. J. & Bazley, E. N. 1956. The absorption of sound in air at audio frequencies. Acustica, 6, 238–45.Google Scholar
Falls, J. B. 1978. Bird song and territorial behavior. In: Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect, vol. 4: Aggression, Dominance and Individual Spacing (ed. Krames, L, Pliner, P & Alloway, T), pp. 61–89. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Falls, J. B. 1985. Song matching in Western Meadowlarks. Can. J. Zool., 63, 2520–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falls, J. B. 1987. Does song deter intrusion in white-throated sparrows Zonotrichia alibicollis?Can. J. Zool., 66, 206–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falls, J. B. 1992. Playback: a historical perspective. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication, (ed. McGregor, P. K), pp. 11–33. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Falls, J. B. & Brooks, R. J. 1975. Individual recognition of song in white-throated sparrows. II. Can. J. Zool., 53, 1412–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falls, J. B., Horn, A. G. & Dickinson, T. E. 1988. How western meadowlarks classify their song: evidence from song matching. Anim. Behav., 36, 579–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falls, J. B. & Krebs, J. R. 1975. Sequence of songs in repertoires of western meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta). Can. J. Zool., 53, 1165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farabaugh, S. M. 1982. The ecological and social significance of duetting. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 85–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Farabaugh, S. M., Brown, E. D. & Veltman, C. J. 1988. Song sharing in a group-living songbird, the Australian magpie. Part II. Vocal sharing between territorial neighbors, within and between geographic regions, and between sexes. Behaviour, 104, 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farabaugh, S. M., Linzenbold, A. & Dooling, R. J. 1994. Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls. J. comp. Psychol., 108, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Ficken, R. W., Ficken, M. S. & Hailman, J. P. 1974. Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science, 183, 762–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ficken, R. W., Popp, J. W. & Matthiae, P. E. 1985. Avoidance of acoustic interference by ovenbirds. Wilson Bull., 97, 569–71.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1954. Evolution and bird sociality. In: Evolution as a Process (ed. Huxley, J, Hardy, A & Ford, E), pp. 71–83. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Forstmeier, W. & Balsby, J.S. 2002. Why mated dusky warblers sing so much: territory guarding and male quality announcement. Behaviour, 139, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forstmeier, W., Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & Leisler, B. 2006. Does song reflect age and viability? A comparison between two populations of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 59, 634–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forstmeier, W. & Leisler, B. 2004. Repertoire size, sexual selection and offspring viability in the great reed warbler: changing patterns in space and time. Behav. Ecol., 15, 555–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotheringham, J. R., Martin, P. R. & Ratcliffe, L. 1997. Song transmission and auditory perception of distance in wood warblers (Parulinae). Anim. Behav., 53, 1271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotheringham, J. R. & Ratcliffe, L. 1995. Song degradation and estimation of acoustic distance in black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Can. J. Zool., 73, 858–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, M. & Goller, F. 2002. Respiratory units of motor production and song imitation in the zebra finch. J. Neurobiol., 51, 129–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaddis, P. K. 1983. Differential usage of song types by plain, bridled and tufted titmice. Ornis Scand., 14, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahr, M., Leitner, S., Fusani, L. & Rybak, F. 2002. What is the adaptive role of neurogenesis in adult birds?Progr. Brain Res., 138, 233–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gammon, D. E., Baker, M. C. & Tipton, J. R. 2005. Cultural divergence within novel song in the black-capped-chickadee (Poecile atricapillus). Auk, 122, 853–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garamszegi, L. Z., Balsby, T. J. S., Bell, B. D., et al. 2005. Estimating the complexity of bird song by using the capture-recapture approaches from community ecology. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 57, 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garamszegi, L. Z., Boulinier, T., Møller, A. P., et al. 2002. The estimation of size and composition of avian song repertoires. Anim. Behav., 63, 623–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garamszegi, L. Z. & Eens, M. 2004. Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds. Brain Res. Rev., 44, 187–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garamszegi, L. Z., Møller, A. P. & Erritzoe, J. 2003. The evolution of immune defense and song complexity in birds. Evolution, 57, 905–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garamszegi, L. Z., Pavlova, D. Z., Eens, M. & Møller, A. P. 2007. The evolution of song in female birds in Europe. Behav. Ecol., 18, 86–96.Google Scholar
Gaunt, A. S. & Nowicki, S. 1998. Sound production in birds: Acoustics and physiology revisited. In: Animal Acoustic Communication: Sound Analysis and Research Methods (ed. Hopp, S. L, Owren, M. J & Evans, C. S), pp. 291–322. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gaunt, S. L. L., Baptista, L. F., Sanchez, J. E. & Hernandez, D. 1994. Song learning as evidenced from song sharing in two hummingbird species (Colibri coruscans and C. thalassinus). Auk, 111, 87–103.Google Scholar
Geberzahn, N. & Hultsch, H. 2003. Long-time storage of song types in birds: evidence from interactive playbacks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 270, 1085–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geberzahn, N., Hultsch, H. & Todt, D. 2002. Latent song type memories are accessible through auditory stimulation in a hand-reared songbird. Anim. Behav., 64, 783–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, T. Q. & Hulse, S. H. 2000. Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song. Anim. Behav., 59, 443–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, H. L. 1990. Cultural evolution of male song types in Darwin's medium ground finches, Geospiza fortis. Anim. Behav., 39, 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. M. 1989. Field playback of male display attracts females in a lek breeding sage grouse. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 24, 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. M. & Bradbury, J. W. 1985. Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 18, 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, D. & Gahr, M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, D., Graves, J. A. & Slater, P. J. B. 1999. Seasonal patterns of singing in the willow warbler: evidence against the fertility announcement hypothesis. Anim. Behav., 58, 995–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gil, D., Leboucher, G., Lacroix, A., Cue, R. & Kreutzer, M. 2004. Female canaries produce eggs with greater amounts of testosterone when exposed to preferred male song. Horm. Behav., 45, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, F. B. & Murray, B. G. 1972. Song variation in sympatric blue-winged and golden-winged warblers. Auk, 89, 625–43.Google Scholar
Gill, S. A., Vonhof, M. J., Stutchbury, B. J. M., Morton, E. S. & Quinn, J. S. 2005. No evidence for acoustic mate-guarding in duetting buff-breasted wrens (Thryothorus leucotis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 57, 557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gish, S. L. & Morton, E. S. 1981. Structural adaptations to local habitat acoustics in Carolina Wren songs. Z. Tierpsychol., 56, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, R. 1991. Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird. Nature, 350, 228–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, R. 1993. Tit for tat among neighboring hooded warblers, Wilsonia citrina. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 33, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. A. & Nottebohm, F. 1983. Neuronal production, migration and differentiation in a vocal control nucleus of the adult canary brain. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 2390–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goller, F. & Larsen, O. N. 1997. A new mechanism of sound generation in songbirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 14787–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goller, F. & Larsen, O. N. 2002. New perspectives on mechanisms of sound generation in songbirds. J. comp. Physiol, A 188, 841–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, C. & Ornelas, J. F. 2005. Song structure and microgeographic song variation in wedge-tailed sabrewings (Campylopterus curvipennis) in Veracruz, Mexico. Auk, 122, 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, E. & Kotagama, S. W. 2006a. Context dependent vocal mimicry in a passerine bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 273, 875–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, E. & Katagama, S. W. 2006b. Vocal mimicry by a passerine bird attracts other species involved in mixed-species flocks. Anim. Behav., 72, 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfellow, D. J. & Slater, P. J. B. 1986. A model of bird song dialects. Anim. Behav., 34, 1579–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfellow, D. J. & Slater, P. J. B. 1990. Can chaffinches change songs from year to year?Bioacoustics, 2, 249–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goransson, G., Hogstedt, G., Karlsson, J., Kallander, H. & Ulfstrand, S. 1974. Sangensroll fur revirhallandet hos naktergal Luscinia luscinia – nagra experiment med playback-teknik. Var Fagelvarld 33, 201–9.Google Scholar
Grafe, T. U. & Bitz, J. H. 2004. Functions of duetting in the tropical boubou, Laniarius aethiopicus: territorial defence and mutual mate guarding. Anim. Behav., 68, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafe, T. U., Bitz, J. H. & Wink, M. 2004. Song repertoire and duetting behaviour of the tropical boubou, Laniarius aethiopicus. Anim. Behav., 68, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, B. R. 1984. The significance of song variation in a population of Darwin's finches. Behaviour, 89, 90–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, B. R. & Grant, P. R. 1979. Darwin's finches: population variation and sympatric speciation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 76, 2359–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, B. R. & Grant, P. R. 1996. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finches. Evolution, 50, 2471–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, P. R. 1986. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Greenewalt, C.H. 1968. Bird Song: Acoustics and Physiology. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. W. 1982a. Seasonal patterns of song production by male stonechats Saxicola torquata. Ornis Scand., 13, 225–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. W. 1982b. Song rates and parental care by individual male stonechats Saxicola torquata. Anim. Behav., 30, 245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griessmann, B. & Naguib, M. 2002. Song sharing in neighboring and non-neighboring thrush nightingales (Luscinia luscinia) and its implications for communication. Ethology, 108, 377–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, L. G. 1974. Dialects and geographical variation in the song of the splendid sunbird Nectarinia coccinigaster. Ibis, 116, 314–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groschupf, K. 1985. Changes in five-striped sparrow song in intra- and intersexual contexts. Wilson Bull., 97, 102–5.Google Scholar
Groschupf, K. & Mills, G. S. 1982. Singing behavior of the five-striped sparrow. Condor, 84, 226–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, M. E. & Konishi, M. 1980. Hormone-induced sexual differentiation of brain and behaviour in zebra finches. Science, 208, 1380–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gwinner, E. & Dorka, V. 1965. Beobachtungen an Zilpzalp-Fitis-Mischsängern. Vogelwelt, 86, 146–51.Google Scholar
Hafner, D. J. & Petersen, K. E. 1985. Song dialects and gene flow in the white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys nuttalli. Evolution, 39, 687–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahnloser, R. H., Kozhevnikov, A. A. & Fee, M. S. 2002. An ultrasparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird. Nature, 419, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. L. 2004. A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 55, 415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. L. 2006. Convergent vocal strategies of males and females are consistent with a cooperative function of duetting in Australian magpie-larks. Behaviour, 143, 425–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. L., Illes, A. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 2006. Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on males and females. Behav. Ecol., 17, 260–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, M. L. & Magrath, R. D. 2000. Duetting and mate-guarding in Australian magpie-larks (Grallina cyanoleuca). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 47, 180–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, T. R. 1983. Information and communication. In: Animal Behaviour, vol. 2: Communication, (ed. Halliday, T. R & Slater, P. J. B), pp. 43–81. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?Science, 218, 384–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handford, P. 1981. Vegetational correlates of variation in the song of Zonotrichia capensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 8, 203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handford, P. 1988. Trill rate dialects in the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, in northwestern Argentina. Can. J. Zool., 66, 2658–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handford, P. & Lougheed, S. C. 1991. Variation in duration and frequency characters in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects and body size. Condor, 93, 644–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. 1979. Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation and a hypothesis on its evolution. Anim. Behav., 27, 1270–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. 1981. Coordinated singing in neighbouring yellowhammers (Emberiza citrinella). Natura Jutlandica, 19, 121–38.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. 1999. Long term stability of song elements in the yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella. Bioacoustics, 9, 281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbison, H., Nelson, D. A. & Hahn, T. P. 1999. Long-term persistence of song dialects in the mountain white-crowned sparrow. Condor, 101, 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcus, J. L. 1977. The functions of mimicry in the vocal behaviour of the chorister robin. Z. Tierpsychol., 44, 178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. M. 1966. Absorption of sound in air versus humidity and temperature. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 40, 148–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, R. S. 1990. Expiratory muscle activity during song production in the canary. Respir. Physiol., 81, 177–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartshorne, C. 1956. The monotony threshold in singing birds. Auk, 83, 176–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, C. 1973. Born to Sing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & Schantz, T. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature, 381, 229–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchwell, B. J., Ross, D. J., Fowlie, M. K. & McGowan, A. 2001. Kin discrimination in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 268, 885–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausberger, M. 1993. How studies on vocal communication in birds contribute to a comparative approach of cognition. Ethologia, 3, 171–85.Google Scholar
Hausberger, M., Jenkins, P. F. & Keene, J. 1991. Species-specificity and mimicry in bird song: are they paradoxes? A reevaluation of song mimicry in the European starling. Behaviour, 117, 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, D. 1981. Song dialects, migration, and population structure of Puget Sound white-crowned sparrows. Auk, 98, 512–21.Google Scholar
Helb, H.-W., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Bergmann, H.-H. & Conrads, K. 1985. Mixed singing in European songbirds - a review. Z. Tierpsychol., 69, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, K. & Fabrick, A. 1979. A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimization. Am. Nat., 114, 260–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, A. M. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2004. Effects of early song experience on song preferences and song control and auditory brain regions in female house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). J. Neurobiol., 59, 247–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessler, N. A. & Doupe, A. J. 1999. Singing-related neural activity in a dorsal forebrain basal ganglia circuit of adult zebra finches. J. Neurosci., 19, 10461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuwinkel, H. 1990. The effect of vegetation on the transmission of songs of selected European Passeriformes. Acta Biol. Benrodis, 2, 133–50.Google Scholar
Hiebert, S. M., Stoddard, P. K. & Arcese, P. 1989. Repertoire size, territory acquisition and reproductive success in the song sparrow. Anim. Behav., 37, 266–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiett, J. C. & Catchpole, C. K. 1982. Song repertoires and seasonal song in the yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella. Anim. Behav., 30, 568–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highsmith, R. T. 1989. The singing behavior of golden-winged warblers. Wilson Bull., 101, 36–50.Google Scholar
Hile, A. G., Plummer, T. K. & Striedter, G. F. 2000. Male vocal imitation produces call convergence during pair bonding in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus. Anim. Behav., 59, 1209–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hile, A. G. & Striedter, G. F. 2000. Call convergence within groups of female budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Ethology, 106, 1105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, K. G., Lewis, D. B., Hutchings, M. E. & Coles, R. B. 1980. Directional hearing in the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). I. Acoustic properties of the auditory system. J. exp. Biol., 86, 135–51.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. 1958. Alternative motor patterns in chaffinch song. Anim. Behav., 6, 211–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. & Steele, E. 1976. The effect of male song on an oestrogen-dependent behaviour in the female canary Serinus canarius. Horm. Behav., 7, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindmarsh, A. M. 1984. Vocal mimicry in starlings. Behaviour, 90, 302–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindmarsh, A. M. 1986. The functional significance of vocal mimicry in song. Behaviour, 99, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjorth, I. 1976. The divalent origin and adaptive radiation of grouse songs. Ornis Scand., 7, 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoelzel, A. R. 1986. Song characteristics and response to playback of male and female robins Erithacus rubecula. Ibis, 128, 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoese, W. J., Podos, J., Boetticher, N. C. & Nowicki, S. 2000. Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. J. exp. Biol., 203, 1845–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Holland, J., McGregor, P. K. & Rowe, C. L. 1996. Changes in microgeographic song variation in the corn bunting. J. Avian Biol., 27, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, T. & Hooker, B. I. 1969. Duetting. In: Bird Vocalizations (ed. Hinde, R. A), pp. 185–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, A. & Falls, J. B. 1988a. Structure of Western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta) song repertoires. Can. J. Zool., 66, 284–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, A. G. & Falls, J. B. 1988b. Repertoires and countersinging in western meadowlarks. Ethology, 77, 337–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, A. G. & Falls, J. B. 1988c. Responses of western meadowlarks, Sturnella neglecta, to song repetition and contrast. Anim. Behav., 36, 291–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, G. E., Nelson, D. A. & Volman, S. F. 2000. Re-expression of songs deleted during vocal development in white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys. Anim. Behav., 60, 279–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. 1987. Singing to attract a mate: a stochastic dynamic game. J. theor. Biol., 129, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtman, A. M. 1992. Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 249, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houx, B. B. & ten Cate, C. 1999. Song learning from playback in zebra finches: is there an effect of operant contingency?Anim. Behav. 57, 837–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houx, B. B., ten Cate, C. & Feuth, E. 2000. Variations in zebra finch song copying: an examination of the relationship with tutor song quality and pupil behaviour. Behaviour, 137, 1377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, E. 1920. Territory in Bird Life. London: Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. D. 1974. The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mocking bird song (Mimus polyglottos). Evolution, 28, 428–38.Google Scholar
Huber, S. K. & Podos, J. 2006. Beak morphology and song production covary in a population of Darwin's finches. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 88, 489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M., Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. A. & Peters, S. 1998. Song-type sharing in song sparrows: implications for repertoire function and song learning. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 42, 437–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulse, S. H. 2002. Auditory scene analysis in animal communication. Adv. Study Behav., 31, 163–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulse, S. H., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. & Wisniewski, A. B. 1997. Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of bird song by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). J. comp. Psychol., 111, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, H. 1991. Early experience can modify singing styles: evidence from experiments with nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim. Behav., 42, 883–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, H. & Kopp, M.-L. 1989. Early auditory learning and song improvisation in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim. Behav., 37, 510–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, H. & Todt, D. 1982. Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 11, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, H. & Todt, D. 1989a. Context memorization in the song learning of birds. Naturwissenschaften, 76, 584–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, H. & Todt, D. 1989b. Memorization and reproduction of songs in nightingales: evidence for package formation. J. comp. Physiol, A. 165, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, H. & Todt, D. 1992. The serial order effect in the song acquisition of birds: relevance of exposure frequency to song models. Anim. Behav., 44, 590–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. L. 1989. Himalayan birds face uphill while singing. Auk, 106, 728–9.Google Scholar
Hunter, M. L., Kacelnik, A., Roberts, J. & Vuillermoz, M. 1986. Directionality of avian vocalizations: a laboratory study. Condor, 88, 371–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. L. & Krebs, J. R. 1979. Geographical variation in the song of the great tit (Parus major) in relation to ecological factors. J. Anim. Ecol., 48, 759–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J. M. C., McNamara, J. M. & Cuthill, I. C. 1993. Song, sexual selection, starvation and strategic handicaps. Anim. Behav., 45, 1153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, J. & Hughes, M. 2006. Territory owners discriminate between aggressive and nonaggressive neighbours. Anim. Behav., 71, 209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immelmann, K. 1963. Drought adaptations in Australian desert birds. Proc. XIII Int. Orn Congr., 2, 649–57.Google Scholar
Immelmann, K. 1969. Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches. In: Bird Vocalizations (ed.Hinde, R. A), pp. 61–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ince, S. A. & Slater, P. J. B. 1985. Versatility and continuity in the songs of thrushes Turdus spp. Ibis, 127, 355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ince, S. A., Slater, P. J. B. & Weismann, C. 1980. Changes with time in the songs of a population of chaffinches. Condor, 82, 285–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, D. E. 2000. Song variation in an avian ring species. Evolution, 54, 998–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, D. E., Bensch, S. & Price, T. D. 2001. Speciation in a ring. Nature, 409, 333–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, D. E. & Irwin, J. H. 2004. Speciation in a ring: the role of song. In Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P & Slabbekoorn, H), p. 204. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, R. E. 1990. Directional selection cannot explain variation in song repertoire size in the New World blackbirds (Icterinae). Ethology, 85, 212–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isler, M. L., Isler, P. R. & Brumfield, R. T. 2005. Clinal variation in vocalisations of an antbird (Thamnophilidae) and implications for defining species limits. Auk, 122, 433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janik, V. M. 1999. Pitfalls in the categorization of behaviour: a comparison of dolphin whistle classification methods. Anim. Behav., 57, 133–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janik, V. M. & Slater, P. J. B. 2000. The different roles of social learning in vocal communication. Anim. Behav., 60, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvi, T., Radesater, T. & Jakobsson, S. 1980. The song of the willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus with special reference to singing behaviour in agonistic situations. Ornis Scand., 11, 236–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, E. D. 2004. Brains and birdsong. In Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P & Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 229–275. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, E. D. & Nottebohm, F. 1997. Motor-driven gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 4097–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, E. D., Smith, V. A., Wada, K., et al. 2002. A framework for integrating the songbird brain. J. comp. Physiol, A 188, 961–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, P. F. 1978. Cultural transmission of song patterns and dialect development in a free-living bird population. Anim. Behav., 26, 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, P. F. & Baker, A. J. 1984. Mechanisms of song differentiation in introduced populations of chaffinches Fringilla coelebs in New Zealand. Ibis, 126, 510–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilka, A. & Leisler, B. 1974. Die Einpassung dreier Rohrsängerarten (Acrocephalus schoenabaenus, A. scirpaceus, A. arundinaceus) in ihre Lebensräume in bezug auf das Frequenzspektrum ihrer Reviergesänge. J. Orn., 115, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, H. & Clayton, D.F. 1997. Localized changes in immediate early gene regulation during sensory and motor learning in zebra finches. Neuron, 19, 1049–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, L. S. 1987. Pattern of song type use for territorial defence in the plain titmouse Parus inornatus. Ornis Scand., 18, 24–32.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. S. & Searcy, W. A. 1996. Female attraction to male song in house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behaviour, 133, 357–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. E. & Slater, P. J. B. 1993. Do young male zebra finches prefer to learn songs that are familiar to females with which they are housed?Anim. Behav., 46, 616–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. E. & Slater, P. J. B. 1996. The role of aggression in song tutor choice in the zebra finch: cause or effect?Behaviour, 133, 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. E., ten Cate, C. & Bijleveld, C. C. J. H. 2001. The interobserver reliability of scoring sonagrams by eye: a study on methods, illustrated on zebra finch songs. Anim. Behav., 62, 791–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. E., ten Cate, C. & Slater, P. J. B. 1996. Early experience and plasticity of song in adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J. comp. Psychol., 110, 354–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouventin, P. & Aubin, T. 2002 Acoustic systems are adapted to breeding ecologies: individual recognition in nesting penguins. Anim. Behav., 64, 747–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouventin, P., Aubin, T. & Lengagne, T. 1999 Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Anim. Behav., 57, 1175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouventin, P., Guillotin, M. & Cornet, A. 1979. Le chant du manchot empereur et sa signification adaptive. Behaviour, 70, 231–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacelnik, A. & Krebs, J. R. 1983. The dawn chorus in the great tit (Parus major): proximate and ultimate causes. Behaviour, 83, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, M. G. 1989. A comparison of the song and territorial behaviour of a long-distance migrant, the marsh warbler Acrocephalus palustris, in summer and winter. Ibis, 131, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempenaers, B., Verheyen, G. R. & Dhondt, A. A. 1997. Extrapair paternity in the blue tit Parus caeruleus: female choice, male characteristics and offspring quality. Behav. Ecol., 8, 481–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempenaers, B., Verheyen, G. R., Broeck, M., Burke, T., Broeckhoven, C. & Dhondt, A.A. 1992. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high quality males in the blue tit. Nature, 357, 494–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khayutin, S. N. 1985. Sensory factors in the behavioral ontogeny of altricial birds. Adv. Study Behav., 15, 105–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilner, R. M., Noble, D. G. & Davies, N.B. 1999. Signals of need in a parent-offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature, 397, 667–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. P. & West, M. J. 1977. Species identification in the North American cowbird: Appropriate responses to abnormal song. Science, 195, 1002–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, A. P. & West, M. J. 1983. Epigenesis of cowbird song – a joint endeavour of males and females. Nature, 305, 704–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. R. 1972. Variation in the song of the rufous collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, in northwestern Argentina. Z. Tierpsychol., 30, 344–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipper, S., Mundry, R., Hultsch, H. & Todt, D. 2004. Long-term persistence of performance rules in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): a longitudinal field study on repertoire size and composition. Behaviour, 141, 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirn, J. R., Alvarez-Buylla, A. & Nottebohm, F. 1991. Production and survival of projection neurons in a forebrain vocal centre of adult male canaries. J. Neurosci., 11, 1756–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirn, J. R., Clower, R. P., Kroodsma, D. E. & DeVoogd, T. J. 1989. Song-related brain regions in the red-winged blackbird are affected by sex and season but not repertoire size. J. Neurobiol., 20, 139–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirn, J. R. & DeVoogd, T. J. 1989. The genesis and death of vocal control neurons during sexual differentiation in the zebra finch. J. Neurosci., 9, 3176–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleeman, P. M. & Gilardi, J. D. 2005. Geographical variation of St Lucia parrot flight vocalizations. Condor, 107, 62–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klump, G. M., Kretzschmar, E. & Curio, E. 1986. The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 18, 317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klump, G. M. & Shalter, M. D. 1984. Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context. Z. Tierpsychol., 66, 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, M. 1963. The role of auditory feedback in the vocal behavior of the domestic fowl. Z. Tierpsychol., 20, 349–67.Google Scholar
Konishi, M. 1964. Effects of deafening on song development in two species of juncos. Condor, 66, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, M. 1965a. Effects of deafening in song development in American robins and black-headed grosbeaks. Z. Tierpsychol., 22, 584–99.Google Scholar
Konishi, M. 1965b. The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalisation in the white-crowned sparrow. Z. Tierpsychol., 22, 770–8.Google Scholar
Konishi, M. 1970. Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalization in songbirds. Z. vergl. Physiol., 66, 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, M. & Nottebohm, F. 1969. Experimental studies in the ontogeny of avian vocalizations. In: Bird Vocalizations (ed. Hinde, R. A), pp. 29–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kopuchian, C., Lijtmaer, D. A., Tubaro, P. L. & Handford, P. 2004. Temporal stability and change in a microgeographical pattern of song variation in the rufous-collared sparrow. Anim. Behav., 68, 551–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, H. G. & Lemon, R. E. 1983. Dynamics of territorial singing between neighboring song sparrows. Behaviour, 85, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krams, I. 2001. Perch selection by singing chaffinches: a better view of surroundings and the risk of predation. Behav. Ecol., 12, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. 1976. Habituation and song repertoires in the great tit. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1, 215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. 1977a. The significance of song repertoires: the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim. Behav., 25, 475–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. 1977b. Song and territory in the great tit. In: Evolutionary Ecology, (ed. Stonehouse, B & Perrins, C), pp. 47–62. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R., Ashcroft, R. & Orsdol, K. 1981a. Song matching in the great tit Parus major L. Anim. Behav., 29, 918–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R., Ashcroft, R. & Webber, M. 1978. Song repertoires and territory defence in the great tit. Nature, 271, 539–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R., Avery, M. & Cowie, R.J. 1981b. Effect of removal of mate on the singing behaviour of great tits. Anim. Behav., 29, 635–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. Davies, N. B. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. & Dawkins, R. 1984. Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (ed. Krebs, J. R & Davies, N. B), pp. 380–402. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. & Kroodsma, D. E. 1980. Repertoires and geographical variation in bird song. Adv. Study Behav., 11, 143–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, E. & Schwabl, H. 1991. Control of winter song and territorial aggression of female robins (Erithacus rubecula) by testosterone. Ethology, 87, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D.E. 1976. Reproductive development in a female songbird: differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science, 192, 574–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D.E. 1977. Correlates of song organization among North European wrens. Am. Nat., 111, 995–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1978a. Aspects of learning in the ontogeny of birdsong. In: The Development of Behavior: Comparative and Evolutionary Aspects (ed. Burghardt, G. M & Bekoff, M), pp. 215–30. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1978b. Continuity and versatility in bird song: support for the monotony-threshold hypothesis. Nature, 274, 681–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1982. Song repertoires: Problems in their definition and use. In: Acoustic Communication In Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 125–46. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1984. Songs of the alder flycatcher (Empidonax alnorum) and willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) are innate. Auk, 101 13–24.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1985. Development and use of two song forms by the Eastern phoebe. Wilson Bull., 97, 21–9.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1986. Design of song playback experiments. Auk, 103, 640–2.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1988. Song types and their use: developmental flexibility of the male blue-winged warbler. Ethology, 79, 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1989a. Male eastern phoebes (Sayornis phoebe; Tyrannidae, Passeriformes) fail to imitate songs. J. comp. Psychol., 103, 227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1989b. Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Anim. Behav., 37, 600–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1990a. Patterns in songbird singing behaviour: Hartshorne vindicated. Anim. Behav., 39, 994–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 1990b. Using appropriate experimental designs for intended hypotheses in ‘song’ playbacks, with examples for testing effects of song repertoire sizes. Anim. Behav., 40, 1138–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. 2004. The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P & Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 111–34. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. 2005. The Singing Life of Birds. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. & Baylis, J. R. 1982. A world survey of evidence for vocal learning in birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 311–37. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E., Bereson, R. C., Byers, B. E. & Minear, E. 1989. Use of song types by the chestnut-sided warbler: evidence for both intra- and inter-sexual functions. Can. J. Zool., 67, 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. & Byers, B. E. 1991. The function(s) of bird song. Amer. Zool., 31, 318–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E., Byers, B. E., Goodale, E., Johnson, S. & Liu, W.-C. 2001. Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later. Anim. Behav., 61, 1029–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. & Canady, R.A. 1985. Differences in repertoire size, singing behaviour and associated neuroanatomy among marsh wren populations have a genetic basis. Auk, 102, 439–46.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E., Houlihan, P. W., Fallon, P. A. & Wells, J. A. 1997. Song development in grey catbirds. Anim. Behav., 54, 457–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroodsma, D. E. & Konishi, M. 1991. A suboscine bird (eastern phoebe, Sayornis phoebe) develops normal song without auditory feedback. Anim. Behav., 42, 477–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E., Liu, W.-C., Goodwin, E. & Bedell, P. A. 1999a. The ecology of song improvisation as illustrated by North American sedge wrens. Auk, 116, 373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. & Parker, L. D. 1977. Vocal virtuosity in the brown thrasher. Auk, 94, 783–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. & Pickert, R. 1980. Environmentally dependent sensitive periods for avian vocal learning. Nature, 288, 477–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E., Sanchez, J., Stemple, D. W., Goodwin, E., Silva, M. L. d. & Vielliard, J. M. E. 1999b. Sedentary lifestyle of neotropical sedge wrens promotes song imitation. Anim. Behav., 57, 855–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. & Verner, J. 1987. Use of song repertoires among marsh wren populations. Auk, 104, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E., Woods, R. W. & Goodwin, E. A. 2002. Falkland island sedge wrens (Cistothorus platensis) imitate rather than improvise large song repertoires. Auk, 119, 523–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunc, H. P., Amrhein, V. & Naguib, M. 2005. Seasonal variation in dawn song characteristics in the common nightingale. Anim. Behav., 70, 1265–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunc, H. P., Amrhein, V. & Naguib, M. 2006. Vocal interactions in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos: more aggressive males have higher pairing success. Anim. Behav., 72, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachlan, R. F. & Servedio, M. R. 2004. Song learning accelerates allopatric speciation. Evolution, 58, 2049–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachlan, R. F. & Slater, P. J. B. 1999. The maintenance of vocal learning by gene-culture interaction: the cultural trap hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 266, 701–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachlan, R. F. & Slater, P. J. B. 2003. Song learning in chaffinches: how accurate, and from where?Anim. Behav., 65, 957–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, D. 1946. The Life of the Robin. London: Witherby.Google Scholar
Laiolo, P. & Tella, J. L. 2005. Habitat fragmentation affects culture transmission: patterns of song-matching in Dupont's lark. J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 1183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrechts, M. 1988. Great tit song output is determined by both motivation and by constraints in singing ability: a reply to Weary et al. Anim. Behav., 36, 1244–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrechts, M. & Dhondt, A. 1986. Male quality, reproduction and survival in the great tit Parus major. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrechts, M. & Dhondt, A. A. 1987. Differences in singing performance between male great tits. Ardea, 75, 43–52.Google Scholar
Lambrechts, M. & Dhondt, A. A. 1988. The anti-exhaustion hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the great tit. Anim. Behav., 36, 327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, H. M. 1991. The response of male redwings Turdus iliacus to playback of conspecific songs with or without the terminating twitter. Ornis Scand., 22, 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, H. M. & Espmark, Y. O. 1987. Singing activity and song pattern of the redwing Turdus iliacus during the breeding season. Ornis Scand., 18, 179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. L. & Barlow, J. C. 1997. Cultural evolution in the Eurasian tree sparrow: divergence between introduced and ancestral populations. Condor, 99, 413–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langmore, N. E. 1998. Functions of duet and solo songs of female birds. Trends Ecol. Evol., 13, 136–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langmore, N. E. & Davies, N. B. 1997. Female dunnocks use vocalizations to compete for males. Anim. Behav., 53, 881–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langmore, N. E., Davies, N. B., Hatchwell, B. J. & Hartley, I. R. 1996. Female song attracts males in the alpine accentors Prunella collaris. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 263, 141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larom, D., Garstang, M., Payne, K., Raspet, R. & Lindeque, M. 1997. The influence of surface atmospheric conditions on the range and area reached by animal vocalizations. J. exp. Biol., 200, 421–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Larsen, O. N. 2004. Does the environment constrain avian sound localization?An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc., 76, 267–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, O. N. & Dabelsteen, T. 1990. Directionality of blackbird vocalization. Implications for vocal communication and its further study. Ornis Scand., 21, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, O. N. & Goller, F. 1999. Role of syringeal vibrations in bird vocalizations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 266, 1609–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, O. N. & Goller, F. 2002. Direct observation of syringeal muscle function in songbirds and a parrot. J. exp. Biol., 205, 25–35.Google Scholar
Latruffe, C., McGregor, P. K., Tavares, J. P. & Mota, P. G. 2000. Microgeographic variation in corn bunting (Miliaria calandra) song: quantitative and discrimination aspects. Behaviour, 137, 1241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauay, C., Gerlach, N. M., Adkins-Regan, E. & DeVoogd, T. J. 2004. Female zebra finches require early song exposure to prefer high-quality song as adults. Anim. Behav., 68, 1249–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leader, N., Wright, J. & Yom-Tov, Y. 2000. Microgeographic song dialects in the orange-tufted sunbird (Nectarinia osea). Behaviour, 137, 1613–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leader, N., Wright, J. & Yom-Tov, Y. 2005. Acoustic properties of two urban song dialects in the orange-tufted sunbird (Nectarinia osea). Auk, 122, 231–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leger, D. W. & Mountjoy, D. J. 2003. Geographic variation in song of the bright-rumped attila (Tyrannidae: Attila spadiceus): implications for species status. Auk, 120, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, L. 1983. The changing song patterns of the great tit Parus major. Ornis Fenn., 60, 16–21.Google Scholar
Lein, M. R. 1972. Territorial and courtship songs of birds. Nature, 237, 48–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lein, M. R. 1978. Song variation in a population of chestnut-sided warblers (Dendroica pensylvanica): Its nature and suggested significance. Can. J. Zool., 56, 1266–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitão, A., Dooren, T. J. M. & Riebel, K. 2004. Temporal variation in chaffinch Fringilla coelebs song: interrelations between the trill and flourish. J. Avian Biol., 35, 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. & Catchpole, C. K. 2002. Female canaries that respond and discriminate more between male songs of different quality have a larger song control nucleus (HVC) in the brain. J. Neurobiol., 52, 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. & Catchpole, C. K. 2004. Syllable repertoire and the size of the song control system in captive canaries (Serinus canaria). J. Neurobiol., 60, 21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S., Marshall, R. C., Leisler, B. & Catchpole, C. K. 2006. Male song quality, egg size and offspring sex in captive canaries (Serinus canaria). Ethology, 112, 554–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S., Nicholson, J., Leisler, B., DeVoogd, T. J. & Catchpole, C. K. 2002. Song and the song control pathway in the brain can develop independently of exposure to song in the sedge warbler. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 269, 2519–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S., Voigt, C., Garcia-Segura, L., Van't Hof, T. & Gahr, M. 2001. Seasonal activation of song motor memories in wild canaries is not reflected in neuroanatomical changes of forebrain song areas. Horm. Behav., 40, 160–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S., Voigt, C., Metzdorf, R. & Catchpole, C. K. 2005. Immediate early gene (ZENK, Arc) expression in the auditory forebrain of female canaries varies in response to male song quality. J. Neurobiol., 64, 275–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemon, R. E. 1968. The relation between organization and function of song in cardinals. Behaviour, 32, 158–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E. 1974. Song dialects, song matching and species recognition by cardinals Richmondena cardinalis. Ibis, 116, 545–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E. 1975. How birds develop song dialects. Condor, 77, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E. & Chatfield, C. 1971. Organization of song in cardinals. Anim. Behav., 19, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E., Cotter, R., MacNally, R. C. & Monette, S. 1985. Song repertoires and song sharing by American redstarts. Condor, 87, 457–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E., Dobson, C. W. & Clifton, P. G. 1993. Songs of American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): sequencing rules and their relationships to repertoire size. Ethology, 93, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E., Falls, J. B., Dickinson, T., Perreault, S. & Tittler, R. 2000. Song clustering by meadowlarks: is it related to repertoire size?Behaviour, 137, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E., Fieldes, M. A. & Struger, J. 1981a. Testing the monotony threshold of bird song. Z. Tierpsychol., 56, 359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E., Monette, S. & Roff, D. 1987. Song repertoires of American warblers (Parulinae): Honest advertising or assessment?Ethology, 74, 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E., Perreault, S. & Weary, D. M. 1994. Dual strategies of song development in American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla). Anim. Behav., 47, 317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, R. E., Struger, J., Lechowicz, M. J. & Norman, R. F. 1981b. Song features and singing heights of American warblers: maximization or optimization of distance?J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 69, 1169–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, M. L. & Horn, A. G. 2001. Begging calls and parental feeding decisions in tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 49, 170–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, M. L., Horn, A. G., Brown, C. R. & Fernandez, N. J. 1997. Parent-offspring recognition in tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor. Anim. Behav., 54, 1107–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonardo, A. & Konishi, M. 1999. Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback. Nature, 399, 466–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leppelsack, H. J. & Vogt, M. 1976. Responses of auditory neurons in the forebrain of a songbird to stimulation with species-specific sounds. J. comp. Physiol., 107, 263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, R. N. 1996a. Song behaviour and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus. I. Removal experiments. Anim. Behav., 52, 1093–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, R. N. 1996b. Song behaviour and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus. II. Playback experiments. Anim. Behav., 52, 1107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, B. & Coles, R. 1980. Sound localization in birds. Trends Neurosci., 3, 102–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. C., Jarvis, E. D., Alvarez-Borda, B., Lim, D. A. & Nottebohm, F. 2000. A relationship between behavior, neurotrophin expression and new neuron survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 8584–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lind, H., Dabelsteen, T. & McGregor, P. K. 1996. Female great tits can identify mates by song. Anim. Behav., 52, 667–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, C. 1998. Limited geographical variation in the vocalizations of a neotropical funariid, Synallaxis albescens. Wilson Bull., 110, 368–74.Google Scholar
Liu, W.-C. 2004. The effects of neighbours and females on dawn and daytime singing behaviours by male chipping sparrows. Anim. Behav., 68, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, C. A. 1983. Reproductively dependent song cyclicity in mated male mockingbirds Mimus polyglottos. Auk, 100, 404–13.Google Scholar
Logan, C. A., Hyatt, L. E. & Gregorcyk, L. 1990. Song playback initiates nest building during clutch overlap in mockingbirds, Mimus polyglottos. Anim. Behav., 39, 943–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, D. M. 2006. The duet code of the female back-bellied wren. Condor, 108, 326–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, D. M. & Gammon, D. E. 2004. Duet song and sex roles during territory defence in a tropical bird, the black-bellied wren, Thryothorus fasciatoventris. Anim. Behav., 68, 721–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lougheed, S. C. & Handford, P. 1992. Vocal dialects and the structure of geographic variation in morphological and allozymic characters in the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis. Evolution, 46, 1443–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lougheed, S. C., Handford, P. & Baker, A. J. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA hyperdiversity, vocal dialects and subspecies in the rufous-collared sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis). Condor, 95, 889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lougheed, S. C., Lougheed, A. J., Rae, M. & Handford, P. 1989. Analysis of a dialect boundary in chaco vegetation in the rufous-collared sparrow. Condor, 91, 1002–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, S. F. & Lein, M. R. 2004. Neighbor-stranger discrimination by song in a suboscine bird, the alder flycatcher, Empidonax alnorum. Behav. Ecol., 15, 799–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, S. F. & Lein, M. R. 2005 Individual recognition of neighbors by song in a suboscine bird, the alder flycatcher Empidonax alnorum. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 57, 623–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luschi, P. 1993. Improvisation of new notes during singing by male Sardinian warblers. Bioacoustics, 4, 235–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, A. & Baker, A. J. 1986. Congruence of morphometric and cultural evolution in Atlantic island chaffinch populations. Can. J. Zool., 64, 1576–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, A. & Baker, A. J. 1993. A population memetics approach to cultural evolution in chaffinch song: meme diversity within populations. Am. Nat., 141, 597–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, A. & Baker, A. J. 1994. A population memetics approach to cultural evolution in chaffinch song: differentiation among populations. Evolution, 48, 351–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, A., Plunkett, G. M., Baker, A. J. & Jenkins, P. F. 1989. A model of cultural evolution of chaffinch song derived with the meme concept. Am. Nat., 133, 634–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I. F., Kempster, B., Zanette, L. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2006. Early nutritional stress impairs development of a song control brain region in both male and female juvenile song sparrows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 273, 2559–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDougall-Shackleton, E. & Harbison, H. 1998. Singing behavior of lekking green hermits. Condor, 100, 149–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Hulse, S. H. & Ball, G. F. 1998. Neural correlates of singing behaviour in male zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. J. Neurobiol., 36, 421–30.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDougall-Shackleton, E. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. 2001. Cultural and genetic evolution in mountain white-crowned sparrows: song dialects are associated with population structure. Evolution, 55, 2568–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, R. H. 1986. Importance of female behaviour in the dawn chorus. Anim. Behav., 34, 621–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, R. H. 1987a. The dawn chorus in the great tit Parus major is related to female fertility. Nature, 330, 745–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, R. H. 1987b. Why do birds sing at dawn. Ardea, 75, 123–32.Google Scholar
Mace, R. H. 1989. The relationship between daily routines of singing and foraging: an experiment on captive great tits Parus major. Ibis, 131, 415–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNally, R. C. & Lemon, R. E. 1985. Repeat and serial singing modes in American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): a test of functional hypotheses. Z. Tierpsychol., 69, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, J. R. & Davies, N. B. 2006. a host-race difference in begging calls of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus develops through experience and increases host provisioning. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 273, 2343–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malacarne, G., Cucco, M. & Camanni, S. 1991. Coordinated visual displays and vocal duetting in different ecological situations among Western Palearctic non-passerine birds. Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 3, 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, N. I., Dingess, K. A. & Slater, P. J. B. 2005. Antiphonal four-part synchronized chorusing in a Neotropical wren. Biol. Lett., 2, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, N. I., Marshall-Ball, L. & Slater, P. J. B. 2003. The complex song duet of the plain wren. Condor, 105, 672–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, N. I. & Slater, P. J. B. 1994. What causes young male zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, to choose their father as song tutor?Anim. Behav., 47, 671–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, N. I., Slater, P. J. B., Eales, L. A. & Richards, C. 1991. The influence of visual stimuli on song tutor choice in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim. Behav., 42, 285–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margoliash, D. 1983. Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. J. Neurosci., 3, 1039–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margoliash, D. 1986. Preference for autogenous song by auditory neurons in a song system nucleus of the white-crowned sparrow. J. Neurosci., 6, 1643–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margoliash, D. & Fortune, E. S. 1992. Temporal and harmonic combination-sensitive neurons in the zebra finch's HVC. J. Neurosci., 12, 4309–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. 1952. Variations in the song of the chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs. Ibis, 94, 458–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. 1955. Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature, 176, 6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. 1960. Bird songs and mate selection. In: Animal Sounds and Communication (ed. Lanyon, W. E & Tavolga, W. N), pp. 348–67. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Biological Sciences.Google Scholar
Marler, P. 1969. Tonal quality in bird sounds. In: Bird Vocalizations (ed. Hinde, R. A), pp. 5–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marler, P. 1970. A comparative approach to vocal learning: song development in white-crowned sparrows. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 71 (Suppl.), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. 1981. Birdsong: the acquisition of a learned motor skill. Trends Neurosci., 3, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. 1987. Sensitive periods and the roles of specific and general sensory stimulation in birdsong learning. In: Imprinting and Cortical Plasticity (ed. Rauschecker, J. P & Marler, P), pp. 99–135. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marler, P. 1990. Song learning: the interface between behaviour and neuroethology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, 329, 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. 1991. Song-learning behavior: the interface with neuroethology. Trends Neurosci., 14, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. 2004. Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P & Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 135–80. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marler, P. & Nelson, D. 1992. Neuroselection and song learning in birds: species universals in culturally transmitted behavior. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 4, 415–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Peters, S. 1977. Selective vocal learning in a sparrow. Science, 198, 519–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Peters, S. 1981. Sparrows learn adult song and more from memory. Science, 213, 780–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. & Peters, S. 1982a. Developmental overproduction and selective attrition: new processes in the epigenesis of bird song. Dev. Psychobiol., 15, 369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Peters, S. 1982b. Structural change in song ontogeny in the swamp sparrow. Auk, 99, 446–58.Google Scholar
Marler, P. & Peters, S. 1987. A sensitive period for song acquisition in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia: a case of age-limited learning. Ethology, 76, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Peters, S. 1988a. Sensitive periods for song acquisition from tape recordings and live tutors in the swamp sparrow, Melospiza georgiana. Ethology, 77, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Peters, S. 1988b. The role of song phonology and syntax in vocal learning preferences in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia. Ethology, 77, 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P., Peters, S., Ball, G. F., Dufty, A. M. & Wingfield, J. C. 1988. The role of sex steroids in the acquisition and production of bird song. Nature, 336, 770–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Pickert, R. 1984. Species-universal microstructure in a learned birdsong: the swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana). Anim. Behav., 32, 673–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Sherman, V. 1983. Song structure without auditory feedback: emendations of the auditory template hypothesis. J. Neurosci., 3, 517–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. & Tamura, M. 1964. Song “dialects” in three populations of white-crowned sparrows. Science, 146, 1483–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, R. C., Buchanan, K. L. & Catchpole, C. K. 2003. Sexual selection and individual genetic diversity in a songbird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 270 (Suppl) S248–S250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, R. C., Buchanan, K. L. & Catchpole, C. K. 2007. Song and female choice for extra-pair copulations in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. Anim. Behav., 73, 629–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, R. C., Leisler, B., Catchpole, C. K. & Schwabl, H. 2005. Male song quality affects circulating but not yolk steroid concentrations in female canaries (Serinus canaria). J. exp. Biol., 208, 4593–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall-Ball, L., Mann, N. I. & Slater, P. J. B. 2006. Multiple functions to duet singing: hidden conflict and apparent cooperation. Anim. Behav., 71, 823–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall-Ball, L. & Slater, P. J. B. 2004. Duet singing and repertoire use in threat signaling of the individual and the pair. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 271, S440–S443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marten, K. & Marler, P. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 2, 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marten, K., Quine, D. & Marler, P. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 2, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, J. & Geduldig, G. 1990. Acoustic adaptations of birds living close to Himalayan torrents. In: Proc. Int. 100 Meet. Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft, pp. 123–131. Bonn.Google Scholar
Martens, J. & Kessler, P. 2000. Territorial song and song neighbourhoods in the scarlet rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus. J. Avian Biol., 31, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, M. J. M. 1980. Foliage as a low pass filter: experiments with model forests in an anechoic chamber. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 67, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, D. J. 1990. Songs of the fox sparrow. III. Ordering of song. Wilson Bull., 102, 655–71.Google Scholar
Mathevon, N., Aubin, T. & Dabelsteen, T. 1996. Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology, 102, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matyjasiak, P. 2004 Birds associate species-specific acoustic and visual cues: recognition of heterospecific rivals by male blackcaps. Behav. Ecol., 16, 467–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D. 2003. Animal Signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCasland, J. S. 1987. Neuronal control of bird song production. J. Neurosci., 7, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCracken, K. G. & Sheldon, F. H. 1997. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 3833–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, M. V. 1989. Function of song in Scott's seaside sparrow. Anim. Behav., 38, 468–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1980. Song dialects in the corn bunting (Emberiza calandra). Z. Tierpsychol., 54, 285–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1983. The response of corn buntings to playback of dialects. Z. Tierpsychol., 62, 256–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1986. Song types in the corn bunting Emberiza calandra: matching and discrimination. J. Orn., 127, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1988. Song length and ‘male quality’ in the chiffchaff. Anim. Behav., 36, 606–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1989. Bird song and kin recognition: potential, constraints and evidence. Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 1, 123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1991. The singer and the song: on the receiving end of bird song. Biol. Rev., 66, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. (ed.) 1992a. Playback and Studies of Animal Communication. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1992b. Quantifying responses to playback: one, many, or composite multivariate measures. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (ed. McGregor, P. K), pp. 79–96. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. 1993. Signalling in territorial systems: a context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 340, 237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. (ed) 2005. Animal Communication Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Avery, M. I. 1986. The unsung songs of great tits Parus major: learning neighbours' songs for discrimination. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 18, 311–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K., Catchpole, C. K., Dabelsteen, T. et al. 1992a. Design of playback experiments: the Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW consensus. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (ed. McGregor, P. K), pp. 1–9. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Dabelsteen, T. 1996. Communication networks. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 409–25. Ithaca, NY, and London: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
McGregor, P. K., Dabelsteen, T., Shepherd, M. & Pedersen, S. B. 1992b. The signal value of matched singing in great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments. Anim. Behav., 43, 987–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Falls, J. B. 1984. The response of western meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) to the playback of undegraded and degraded songs. Can. J. Zool., 62, 2125–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Krebs, J. R. 1982a. Song types in a population of great tits (Parus major): their distribution, abundance and acquisition by individuals. Behaviour, 79, 126–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Krebs, J. R. 1982b. Mating and song types in the great tit. Nature, 297, 60–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Krebs, J. R. 1984a. Song learning and deceptive mimicry. Anim. Behav., 32, 280–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Krebs, J. R. 1984b. Sound degradation as a distance cue in great tit (Parus major) song. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 16, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K., Krebs, J. R. & Ratcliffe, L. M. 1983. The reaction of great tits (Parus major) to playback of degraded and undegraded songs: the effect of familiarity with the stimulus song type. Auk, 100, 898–906.Google Scholar
McGregor, P. K. & Thompson, D. B. A. 1988. Constancy and change in local dialects of the corn bunting. Ornis Scand., 19, 153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K., Walford, V. R. & Harper, D. G. C. 1988. Song inheritance and mating in a songbird with local dialects. Bioacoustics, 1, 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, P. K., Krebs, J. R. & Perrins, C. M. 1981. Song repertoires and lifetime reproductive success in the great tit Parus major. Am. Nat., 118, 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, J. M., Mace, R. H. & Houston, A.I. 1987. Optimal daily routines of singing and foraging in a bird singing to attract a mate. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 20, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medvin, M. B. & Beecher, M. D. 1986. Parent-offspring recognition in the barn swallow. Anim. Behav., 34, 1627–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, C. V., Nottebohm, F. & Clayton, D. 1995. repeated exposure to one song leads to a rapid and persistent decline in an immediate early gene's response to that song in the zebra finch telencephalon. J. Neurosci., 15, 6919–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, C. V., Vicario, D. S. & Clayton, D. F. 1992. Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird's forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 6818–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennill, D. J. 2006. Aggressive responses of male and female rufous-and-white wrens to stereo duet playback. Anim. Behav., 71, 219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennill, D. J., Boag, P. T. & Ratcliffe, L. M. 2003. The reproductive choices of eavesdropping female black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. Naturwissenschaften, 90, 577–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennill, D. J., Ratcliffe, L. M. & Boag, P. T. 2002. Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science, 296, 873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennill, D. J. & Rogers, A. C. 2006. Whip it good! Geographic consistency in male songs and variability in female songs of the duetting eastern whipbird Psophodes olicaceus. J. Avian Biol., 37, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelsen, A. 1983. Biophysical basis of sound communication. In: Bioacoustics: A Comparative Approach (ed. Lewis, B), pp. 3–38. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. B. 1979a. Long-term recognition of father's song by female zebra finches. Nature, 280, 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. B. 1979b. The acoustic basis of mate recognition by female zebra finches (Taeniogpygia guttata). Anim. Behav. 27, 376–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. H. 1982. Character and variance shift in acoustic signals of birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 1 (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 253–95. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milligan, M. M. & Verner, J. 1971. Inter-populational song discrimination in the white-crowned sparrow. Condor, 73, 208–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millington, S. J. & Price, T. D. 1985. Song inheritance and mating patterns in Darwin's finches. Auk, 102, 342–6.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. 1986. On song post selection and the timing of song in the corn bunting (Miliaria calandra). Ökol. Vögel, 8, 57–66.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. 1988. Spatial and temporal distribution of song in the yellowhammer Emberiza cintrinella. Ethology, 78, 321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, A. P. 1991. Why mated songbirds sing so much: mate guarding and male announcement of mate fertility status. Am. Nat., 138, 994–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, A. P., Henry, P. Y. & Erritzoe, J. 2000. The evolution of song repertoires and immune defence in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 267, 165–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, A. P., Saino, N., Taramino, G., Galeotti, P. & Ferrario, S. 1998. Paternity and multiple signalling: effects of a secondary sexual character and song on paternity in the barn swallow. Am. Nat. 151, 236–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molles, L. E. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1999. Repertoire size, repertoire overlap, and singing modes in the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus). Auk, 116, 677–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molles, L. E. &Vehrencamp, S. L. 2001 Neighbour recognition by resident males in the banded wren, Thryothorus pleurostictus, a tropical song bird with high song type sharing. Anim. Behav. 61, 119–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molles, L. E. & Waas, J. R. 2006. Are two heads better than one? Responses of the duetting kokako to one- and two-speaker playback. Anim. Behav., 71, 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. L. & Hardy, J. W. 1983. Vocalizations of the black-throated grey warbler. Wilson Bull., 95, 640–3.Google Scholar
Morse, D. H. 1966. The context of songs in the yellow warbler. Wilson Bull., 78, 444–55.Google Scholar
Morse, D. H. 1970. Territorial and courtship songs of birds. Nature, 226, 659–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, D. H. 1989. Song patterns of warblers at dawn and dusk. Wilson Bull., 101, 26–35.Google Scholar
Morton, E. S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat., 109, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, E. S. 1986. Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds. Behaviour, 99, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, E. S. 1987. The effects of distance and isolation on song-type sharing in the Carolina wren. Wilson Bull., 99, 601–10.Google Scholar
Morton, E. S. 1996. Why songbirds learn songs: an arms race over ranging?Poultry & Avian Biology Reviews, 7, 65–71.Google Scholar
Morton, E. S. 1998a. Degradation and signal ranging in birds: memory matters. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 42, 135–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, E. S. 1998b. Reply to Naguib and Wiley. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 42, 147–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, E. S. & Derrickson, K. C. 1996. Song ranging by the dusky antbird, Cercomacra tyrannina – ranging without song learning. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 39, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, E. S., Gish, S. L. & Voort, M. 1986. On the learning of degraded and undegraded songs in the Carolina wren. Anim. Behav., 34, 815–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, D. J. & Lemon, R. E. 1991. Song as an attractant for male and female European starlings, and the influence of song complexity on their response. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, D. J. & Lemon, R. E. 1995. Extended song learning in wild European starlings. Anim. Behav., 49, 357–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, D. J. & Lemon, R. E. 1996. Female choice for complex song in the European starling: a field experiment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 38, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, R. A., Bishop, H., Cooper, M., Dennis, S., Koetsveld, M., Marshall, J., Saunders, B. L. & Langmore, N. E. 2003. Alternate functions for duet and solo songs in magpie-larks, Grallina cyanoleuca. Aust. J. Zool., 51, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundinger, P. C. 1975. Song dialects and colonization in the house finch, Carpodacus mexicanus, on the east coast. Condor, 77, 407–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundinger, P. C. 1982. Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in the acquired vocalizations of birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 147–208. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mundry, R., Hau, B. & Böhner, J. 1994. Individual- und strophenspezifischer Einsatz des “kit” im Gesang des Buchfinken (Fringilla coelebs). J. Orn., 135, 223–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, M. 1996. Ranging by song in Carolina wrens Thyothorus ludovicianus: effects of environmental acoustics and strength of song degradation. Behaviour, 133, 541–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, M. 1997. Ranging of songs in Carolina wrens: effects of familiarity of the song type on use of different cues. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 40, 385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, M. 1998. Perception of degradation in acoustic signals and its implications for ranging. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 42, 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, M. 1999. Effects of song overlapping and alternating on nocturnally singing nightingales. Anim. Behav., 58, 1061–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naguib, M., Altenkamp, R. & Griessmann, B. 2001. Nightingales in space: song and extra-territorial forays of radio tagged song birds. J. Orn., 142, 306–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, M. & Kipper, S. 2006. Effects of different levels of song overlapping on singing behaviour in male territorial nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 59, 419–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, M. & Todt, D. 1997. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Anim. Behav., 54, 1535–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naugler, C. T. & Ratcliffe, L. 1994. Character release in bird song: a test of the acoustic competition hypothesis using American tree sparrows Spizella arborea. J. Avian Biol., 25, 142–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naugler, C. T. & Smith, P. C. 1991. Song similarity in an isolated population of fox sparrows (Passerella iliaca). Condor, 93, 1001–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A. 1988. Feature weighting in species song recognition by the field sparrow Spizella pusilla. Behaviour, 106, 158–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A. 1989. The importance of invariant and distinctive features in species recognition of bird song. Condor, 91, 120–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A. 1992. Song overproduction and selective attrition lead to song sharing in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 30, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A. 1997. Social interaction and sensitive phases for song learning: a critical review. In: Social Influences on Vocal Development (ed. Snowdon, C. T & Hausberger, M), pp. 7–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. A. 1998. External validity and experimental design: the sensitive phase for song learning. Anim. Behav., 56, 487–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, D. A., Khanna, H. & Marler, P. 2001. Learning by instruction or selection: Implications for patterns of geographic variation in bird song. Behaviour, 138, 1137–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A. & Marler, P. 1990. The perception of bird song and an ecological concept of signal space. In: Comparative Perception, Vol. 2. (ed. Stebbins, W. C & Berkley, M. A), pp. 443–78. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. A. & Marler, P. 1993. Innate recognition of song in white-crowned sparrows: a role in selective vocal learning?Anim. Behav., 46, 806–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A., Marler, P. & Morton, M. L. 1996. Overproduction in song development: an evolutionary correlate with migration. Anim. Behav., 51, 1127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A., Marler, P. & Palleroni, A. 1995. A comparative approach to vocal learning: intraspecific variation in the learning process. Anim. Behav., 50, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. A., Marler, P., Soha, J. A. & Fullerton, A. L. 1997. The timing of song memorization differs in males and females: a new assay for avian vocal learning. Anim. Behav., 54, 587–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholls, J. A. & Goldizen, A. W. 2006. Habitat type and density influence vocal signal design in satin bowerbirds. J. Anim. Ecol., 75. (In press.)Google ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, J., Buchanan, K. L., Marshall, R. C. & Catchpole, C. K. 2007. Song sharing and repertoire size in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: changes within and between years. Anim. Behav. (In press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolai, J. 1959. Familientradition in der Gesangsentwicklung des Gimpels (Pyrrhula pyrrhula L.). J. Orn., 100, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, P. M. & Hill, G. E. 2004. Female choice for song characteristics in the house finch. Anim. Behav. 67, 403–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordby, J. C., Campbell, S. E. & Beecher, M. D. 1999. Ecological correlates of song learning in song sparrows. Behav. Ecol., 10, 287–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordby, L. C., Campbell, S. E. & Beecher, M. D. 2001. Late song learning in song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 61, 835–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordby, J. C., Campbell, S. E. & Beecher, M. D. 2002. Adult song sparrows do not alter their song repertoires. Ethology, 108, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordeen, K. W. & Nordeen, E. J. 1988. Projection neurons within a vocal motor pathway are born during song learning in zebra finches. Nature, 334, 149–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordeen, K. W. & Nordeen, E. J. 1992. Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav. Neur. Biol., 57, 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 1968. Auditory experience and song development in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Ibis, 110, 549–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 1969a. The “critical period” for song learning in birds. Ibis, 111, 386–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 1969b. The song of the chingolo (Zonotrichia capensis) in Argentina: description and evaluation of a system of dialects. Condor, 71, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 1971. Neural lateralization of vocal control in a passerine bird. 1 Song. J. exp. Zool., 177, 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 1972. The origins of vocal learning. Am. Nat., 106, 116–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 1975. Continental patterns of song variability in Zonotrichia capensis: some possible ecological correlates. Am. Nat., 109, 605–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 1991. Reassessing the mechanisms and origins of vocal learning in birds. Trends Neurosci., 14, 206–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nottebohm, F. 2000. The anatomy and timing of vocal learning in birds. In The Design of Animal Communication (ed. Hauser, M. D & Konishi, M), pp. 63–110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nottebohm, F. 2002. Why are some neurons replaced in the adult brain?J. Neurosci., 22, 624–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nottebohm, F. 2005. The neural basis of birdsong. PLoS Biol., 3(5), e164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nottebohm, F., Alvarez-Buylla, A., Cynx, J., et al. 1990. Song learning in birds: the relation between perception and production. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 329, 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. & Arnold, A.P. 1976. Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain. Science, 194, 211–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nottebohm, F., Kasparian, S. & Pandazis, C. 1981. Brain space for a learned task. Brain Research, 213, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nottebohm, F. & Nottebohm, M. E. 1971. Vocalizations and breeding behaviour of surgically deafened ring doves. Anim. Behav., 19, 313–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nottebohm, F. & Nottebohm, M.E. 1976. Left hypoglossal dominance in the control of canary and white-crowned sparrow song. J. comp. Physiol., 108, 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F. & Nottebohm, M. E. 1978. Relationship between song repertoire and age in the canary Serinus canaria. Z. Tierpsychol., 46, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F., Nottebohm, M. E. & Crane, L. 1986. Developmental and seasonal changes in canary song and their relation to changes in the anatomy of song control nuclei. Behav. Neural Biol., 46, 445–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nottebohm, F., Nottebohm, M. E., Crane, L. A. & Wingfield, J. C. 1987. Seasonal changes in gonadal hormone levels of adult male canaries and their relation to song. Behav. Neural Biol., 47, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottebohm, F., Stokes, T. M. & Leonard, C. M. 1976. Central control of song in the canary Serinus canarius. J. comp. Neurol., 165, 457–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S. 1987. Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: evidence from bird songs in a helium atmosphere. Nature, 325, 53–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S. & Marler, P. 1988. How do birds sing?Music Perception, 5, 391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S., Marler, P., Maynard, A. & Peters, S. 1992. Is the tonal quality of bird song learned? Evidence from song sparrows. Ethology, 90, 225–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S., Peters, S. & Podos, J. 1998a. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Amer. Zool., 38, 179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S., Peters, S., Searcy, W. A. & Clayton, C. 1999. The development of within-song type variation in song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 57, 1257–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowicki, S. & Searcy, W. A. 2005. Song and mate choice in birds: how the development of behavior helps us understand function. Auk, 122, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. A. & Hughes, M. 1998b. The territory defense function of song in song sparrows: a test with the speaker occupation design. Behaviour, 135, 615–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. A. & Peters, S. 2002. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the “nutritional stress hypothesis”. J. comp. Physiol. A, 188, 1003–14.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, G. L. 1981. Variations and multiple functions of the advertising display of western grebes. Behaviour, 76, 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nürnberger, F., Siebold, D. & Bergmann, H.-H. 1989. Annual changes of learned behaviour – variation of song pattern in free-living chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs, during the breeding season. Bioacoustics, 1, 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberweger, K. & Goller, F. 2001. The metabolic cost of birdsong production. J. exp. Biol., 204, 3379–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Okanoya, K. & Dooling, R. J. 1988. Hearing in the swamp sparrow Melospiza georgiana, and the song sparrow Melospiza melodia. Anim. Behav., 36, 726–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornelas, J. F., Gonzalez, C. & Uribe, J. 2002. Complex vocalizations and aerial displays of the amethyst-throated hummingbird (Lampornis amethystinus). Auk, 119, 1141–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otter, K., Chruszcz, B. & Ratcliffe, L. 1997. Honest advertisement and song output during the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. Behav. Ecol., 8, 167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otter, K., McGregor, P. K., Terry, A. M. R., et al. 1999. Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 266, 1305–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otter, K., Stewart, I. R., McGregor, P. K. et al. 2001. Extra-pair paternity among great tits Parus major following manipulation of male signals. J. Avian Biol., 32, 338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Part, T. 1991. Is dawn singing related to paternity insurance? The case of the collared flycatcher. Anim. Behav., 41, 451–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paton, J. A. & Nottebohm, F. 1984. Neurons generated in the adult brain are recruited into functional circuits. Science, 225, 1046–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patricelli, G. L., Dantzker, M. S. & Bradbury, J. W. 2007. Differences in acoustic directionality among vocalizations of the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) are related to function in communication. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69, 1099–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1978a. Local dialects in the wingflaps of flappet larks Mirafra rufocinnamomea. Ibis, 120, 204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1978b. Microgeographic variation in songs of splendid sunbirds Nectarinia coccinigaster; population phenetics, habitats and song dialects. Behaviour, 65, 282–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1981a. Population structure and social behavior: models for testing the ecological significance of song dialects in birds. In: Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (ed. Alexander, R. D & Tinkle, D. W), pp. 108–20. New York: Chiron Press.Google Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1981b. Song learning and social interaction in indigo buntings. Anim. Behav., 29, 688–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1982. Ecological consequences of song matching: breeding success and intraspecific song mimicry in indigo buntings. Ecology, 63, 401–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1983. The social context of song mimicry: song-matching dialects in indigo buntings (Passerina cyanea). Anim. Behav., 31, 788–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1985. Behavioral continuity and change in local song populations of village indigobirds Vidua chalybeata. Z. Tierpsychol., 70, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1986. Bird songs and avian systematics. Curr. Ornithol., 87–126.Google Scholar
Payne, R. B. 1987. Song dialects and neighborhood habitats in the indigobirds Vidua chalybeata and V. purpurascens at Lochinvar National Park, Zambia. J. Field Ornithol., 58, 152–70.Google Scholar
Payne, R. B. & Groschupf, K. D. 1984. Sexual selection and interspecific competition: a field experiment on territorial behavior of nonparental finches (Vidua spp.). Auk, 101, 140–5.Google Scholar
Payne, R. B. & Payne, K. 1977. Social organization and mating success in local song populations of village indigobirds Vidua chalybeata. Z. Tierpsychol., 45, 133–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Payne, R. B. & Payne, L. L. 1993. Song copying and cultural transmission in indigo buntings. Anim. Behav., 46, 1045–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B., Payne, L. L. & Doehlert, S. M. 1988a. Biological and cultural success of song memes in indigo buntings. Ecology, 69, 104–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B., Payne, L, & Rowley, I. 1988b. Kin and social relationships in splendid fairy wrens: recognition by song in a cooperative bird. Anim. Behav., 36, 1341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. B., Payne, L. L. & Woods, J. L. 1998. Song learning in brood parasitic indigobirds Vidua chalybeata: song mimicry of the host species. Anim. Behav., 55, 1537–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, R. B., Payne, L. L., Woods, J. L. & Sorenson, M. D. 2000. Imprinting and the origin of parasite-host species associations in brood parasitic indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata. Anim. Behav., 59, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, R. B., Thompson, W. L., Fiala, K. L. & Sweany, L. L. 1981. Local song traditions in indigo buntings: cultural transmission of behavior patterns across generations. Behaviour, 77, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, T. M. 2005. Eavesdropping in communication networks. In Animal Communication Networks (ed. McGregor, P. K), pp. 13–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peake, T. M., Otter, K. A., Terry, A. M. R. & McGregor, P. K. 2000. Screech: an interactive playback program for PCs. Bioacoustics, 11, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, T. M., Terry, A. M., McGregor, P. K. & Dabelsteen, T. 2001. Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. 268, 1183–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peek, F.W. 1972. An experimental study of the territorial function of vocal and visual display in the male red-winged blackbird. Anim. Behav., 20, 112–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M. 1981. Functional vocalizations by an African grey parrot. Z. Tierpsychol., 55, 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M. 1985. Social modeling theory: a possible framework for understanding avian vocal learning. Auk, 102, 854–64.Google Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M. 1990. Learning to communicate: the effects of social interaction. In: Perspectives in Ethology, Volume 9 (ed. Bateson, P & Klopfer, P. H), pp. 119–64. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M. 1994. Vocal learning in gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus): effects of social interaction, reference, and context. Auk, 111, 300–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, S., Marler, P. & Nowicki, S. 1992. Song sparrows learn from limited exposure to song models. Condor, 94, 1016–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, S., Searcy, W. A., Beecher, M. D. & Nowicki, S. 2000. Geographic variation in the organization of song sparrow repertoires. Auk, 117, 936–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrinovich, L. 1985. Factors influencing song development in the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys). J. comp. Psychol., 99, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrinovich, L. & Baptista, L. F. 1987. Song development in the white-crowned sparrow: modification of learned song. Anim. Behav., 35, 961–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrinovich, L. & Patterson, T. L. 1981. The responses of white-crowned sparrows to songs of different dialects and subspecies. Z. Tierpsychol., 57, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrinovich, L., Patterson, T. & Baptista, L. 1981. Song dialects as barriers to dispersal: a re-evaluation. Evolution, 35, 180–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinxten, R. & Eens, M. 1998. Male starlings sing most in the late morning, following egg-laying: a strategy to protect their paternity?Behaviour, 135, 1197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planck, R. J., McLaren, G. & Konishi, M. 1975. Temporal pattern shifts in singing birds: a critique. Science, 190, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podos, J. 1996. Motor constraints on vocal development in a songbird. Anim. Behav., 51, 1061–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podos, J. 1997. A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution, 5, 537–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podos, J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signature structure in Darwin's finches. Nature, 409, 185–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podos, J. & Nowicki, S. 2004. Performance limits on bird song. In Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P & Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 322–46. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Poesel, A. & Dabelsteen, T. 2005. Territorial responses of male blue tits to simulated dynamic intrusions: effects of song overlap and intruder location. Anim. Behav., 70, 1419–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poesel, A., Foerster, K. & Kempenaers, B. 2001. The dawn song of the blue tit Parus caeruleus and its role in sexual selection. Ethology, 107, 521–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poesel, A., Kunc, H., Foerster, K., Johnsen, A. & Kempenaers, B. 2006. Early birds are sexy: male age, dawn song and extrapair paternity in blue tits, Cyanistes (formerly Parus) caeruleus. Anim. Behav., 72, 531–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, J. W. & Ficken, R.W. 1987. Effects of non-specific singing on the song of the ovenbird. Bird Behav., 7, 22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, J. W., Ficken, R. W. & Reinartz, J.A. 1985. Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds. Auk, 102, 744–8.Google Scholar
Potash, L. M. 1972. Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail. Psychon. Sci., 26, 252–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, D. R.C. 1987. Territorial responses to song playback in allopatric and sympatric populations of alder Empidonax alnorum and willow E. traillii flycatchers. Wilson Bull., 99, 611–19.Google Scholar
Price, J.J. 1999. Recognition of family-specific calls in stripe-backed wrens. Anim. Behav., 57, 483–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, J. J. & Lanyon, S. M. 2002. Reconstructing the evolution of complex bird song in the oropendolas. Evolution, 56, 1514–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, J. J. & Lanyon, S. M. 2004. Patterns of song evolution and sexual selection in the oropendolas and caciques. Behav. Ecol., 15, 485–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putland, D. A., Nicholls, J. A., Noad, M. J. & Goldizen, A. W. 2006. Imitating the neighbours: vocal dialect matching in a mimic-model system. Biol. Lett., 2, 367–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pytte, C. L., Rusch, K. M. & Ficken, M. S. 2003. Regulation of vocal amplitude by the blue-throated hummingbird, Lampornis clemenciae. Anim. Behav., 66, 703–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radesater, T. & Jakobsson, S. 1989. Song rate correlation of replacement territorial willow warblers Phylloscopus trochilus. Ornis. Scand., 20, 71–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radesater, T., Jakobsson, S., Andbjer, N., Bylin, A. & Nystrom, K. 1987. Song rate and pair formation in the willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus. Anim. Behav., 35, 1645–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, R. & Dabelsteen, T. 2002. Song repertoires and repertoire sharing in a local group of blackbirds. Bioacoustics, 13, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, L. & Weisman, R. G. 1986. Song sequence discrimination in the black-capped chickadee Parus atricapillus. J. comp. Psychol., 100, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, A. F. & Weary, D.M. 1990. Sexual selection and the evolution of bird song: A test of the Hamilton-Zuk hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, A. F. & Weary, D. M. 1992. The evolution of bird song: comparative analyses. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B 338, 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechten, C. 1978. Interspecific mimicry in bird song: does the Beau Geste hypothesis apply?Anim. Behav., 26, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, T.M. 1982. Interspecific territoriality in the chaffinch and the great tit on islands and the mainland of Scotland. Anim. Behav., 30, 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. M., Arcese, P., Cassidy, A. L. E. V. et al. 2004. Song repertoire size predicts initial mating success in male song sparrows, Melospiza melodia. Anim. Behav., 68, 1055–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. M., Arcese, P., Cassidy, A. L. E. V. et al. 2005. Hamilton and Zuk meet heterozygosity? Song repertoire size indicates inbreeding and immunity in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 272, 481–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, M. L. 1987. Costliness and reliability in the singing vigour of Ipswich sparrows. Anim. Behav., 35, 1735–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, T. 1981. Microgeographic variation in the song of the sage sparrow. Condor, 83, 113–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, D. G. 1981a. Alerting and message components in songs of rufous-sided towhees. Behaviour, 76, 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, D. G. 1981b. Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the Carolina wren. Auk, 98, 127–33.Google Scholar
Richards, D. G. & Wiley, R. H. 1980. Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am. Nat., 115, 381–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riebel, K. 2000. Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 267, 2553–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riebel, K. 2003a. Developmental influences on auditory perception in female zebra finches – is there a sensitive phase for song preference learning?Anim. Biol., 53, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riebel, K. 2003b. The ‘mute’ sex revisited: vocal production and perception learning in female songbirds. Adv. Study Behav., 33, 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riebel, K. & Slater, P. J. B. 1999a. Do male chaffinches Fringilla coelebs copy song sequencing and bout length from their tutors. Ibis, 141, 680–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riebel, K. & Slater, P. J. B. 1999b. Song type switching in the chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs: timing or counting. Anim. Behav., 57, 655–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riebel, K. & Slater, P. J. B. 2003. Temporal variation in male chaffinch song depends on the singer and the song type. Behaviour, 140, 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riebel, K., Smallegange, I. M., Terpstra, N. J. & Bolhuis, J. J. 2002. Sexual equality in zebra finch song preference: evidence for a dissociation between song recognition and production learning. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 269, 729–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchison, G. 1981. Variation in the songs of vesper sparrows. Am. Midl. Nat., 106, 392–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchison, G. 1983a. The function of singing in female black-headed grosbeaks (Pheucticus melanocephalus): family group maintenance. Auk, 100, 105–16.Google Scholar
Ritchison, G. 1983b. Possible ‘deceptive’ use of song by female black-headed grosbeaks. Condor, 85, 250–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchison, G. 1985. Variation in the songs of female black-headed grosbeaks. Wilson Bull., 97, 47–56.Google Scholar
Rivers, J. W. & Kroodsma, D. E. 2000. Singing behavior of the hermit thrush. J. Field Orn., 71, 467–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A. 1949. The biological significance of bird song in Australia. Emu, 48, 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, F. N. 1974. The function of vocal mimicry in some avian displays. Emu, 74, 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, F. N. 1975. Vocal mimicry and the evolution of bird song. Emu, 75, 23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, F. N. 1991. Phatic communication in bird song. Emu, 91, 61–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A. C. 2005. Male and female song structure and singing behaviour in the duetting eastern whipbird. Aust. J. Zool., 53, 157–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A. C., Ferguson, J. E., Harrington, H. M., McDowell, S., Miller, A. & Panagos, J. 2004. Use of stereo duet playback to investigate traditional duet playback methods and mechanisms of cooperative territorial defence in magpie-larks. Behaviour, 141, 741–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A. C., Mulder, R. A. & Langmore, N. E. 2006. Duet duels: sex differences in song matching in duetting eastern whipbirds. Anim. Behav., 72, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, D. J. 2003. Geographic song variation within and between populations and subspecies of the rufous bristlebird (Dasyornis broadbenti). Aust. J. Zool., 51, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, R. 1987. Entstehung, Fortbestand und funktionelle Bedeutung von Gesangsdialekten bei der Sumpfmeise Parus palustris: ein Test von Modellen. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre Verlag.
Rost, R. 1990. Hormones and behaviour: a joint examination of studies on seasonal variation in song production and plasma levels of testosterone in the great tit Parus major. J. Orn., 131, 403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, R. 1992. Hormones and behaviour: a comparison of studies on seasonal changes in song production and testosterone plasma levels in the willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Fenn., 69, 1–6.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. I. & Fleischer, R. C. 1987. Vocal dialects and their possible relation to honest status signalling in the brown-headed cowbird. Condor, 89, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppell, W. 1933. Physiologie und Akustik der Vogelstimme. J. Orn., 81, 433–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. J. & Brenowitz, E. A. 1985. The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am. Nat., 126, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. J., Fox, J. H., Wilczynski, W. & Rand, A. S. 1990. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature, 343, 66–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, J. C. & Henry, W. J. 1989. The peripheral auditory system in birds: structural and functional contributions to auditory perception. In: The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds (ed. Dooling, R. J & Hulse, S. H), pp. 35–6. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. C., Duncan, R. K., Doan, D. E. & Werner, Y.L. 2000. The middle ear of reptiles and birds. In: Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles (ed. Popper, A. N), pp. 13–69. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schleidt, W. M. 1964. Über die Spontaneität von Erbkoordinationen. Z. Tierpsychol., 21, 235–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, D. J. & Wiley, R. H. 1983a. Communication with repertoires of song themes in tufted titmice. Anim. Behav., 31, 1128–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, D. J. & Wiley, R. H. 1983b. Communication with shared song themes in tufted titmice. Auk, 100, 414–24.Google Scholar
Schwabl, H. & Kriner, E. 1991. Territorial aggression and song of male European robins (Erithacus rubecula) in autumn and spring: effects of antiandrogen treatment. Horm. Behav., 25, 180–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searcy, W.A. 1984. Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 14, 281–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. 1988. Dual intersexual and intrasexual functions of song in red-winged blackbirds. Proc. XIX Int. Congr. Ornithol., 1, 1373–81.Google Scholar
Searcy, W. A. 1989. Pseudoreplication, external validity and the design of playback experiments. Anim. Behav., 38, 715–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. 1990. Species recognition of song by female red-winged blackbirds. Anim. Behav., 40, 1119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. 1992a. Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. Amer. Zool., 32, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. 1992b. Measuring responses of female birds to male song. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (ed. McGregor, P. K), pp. 175–89. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 17, 507–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Brenowitz, E. A. 1988. Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature, 332, 152–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A., Coffman, S. & Raikow, D. F. 1994. Habituation, recovery and the similarity of song types within repertoires in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) (Aves, Emberizidae). Ethology, 98, 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Marler, P. 1981. A test for responsiveness to song structure and programming in female sparrows. Science, 213, 926–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Marler, P. 1984. Interspecific differences in the response of female birds to song repertoires. Z. Tierpsychol., 66, 128–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A., McArthur, P. D. & Yasukawa, K. 1985. Song repertoire size and male quality in song sparrows. Condor, 87, 222–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A & Nowicki, S. 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Searcy, W. A., Nowicki, S. & Hughes, M. 1997. The response of male and female song sparrows to geographic variation in song. Condor, 99, 651–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A., Nowicki, S., Hughes, M. & Peters, S. 2002. Geographic song discrimination in relation to dispersal distances in song sparrows. Am. Nat., 159, 221–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searcy, W. A., Nowicki, S. & Peters, S. 2003. Phonology and geographic song discrimination in song sparrows. Ethology, 109, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Yasukawa, K. 1990. Use of the song repertoire in intersexual and intrasexual contexts by male red-winged blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 27, 123–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Yasukawa, K. 1996. Song and female choice. In Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 454–73. Ithaca, NY, and London: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Seddon, N. 2002. The structure, context and possible functions of solos, duets and choruses in the subdesert mesite (Monias benschi). Behaviour, 139, 645–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, N. 2005. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution, 59, 200–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seddon, N., Butchart, S. H. M. & Odling-Smee, L. 2002. Duetting in the subdesert mesite Monias benschi: evidence for acoustic mate defence?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 52, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, N. & Tobias, J. A. 2003. Communal singing in the cooperatively breeding subdesert mesite Monias benschi: evidence of numerical assessment?J. Avian. Biol., 34, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, N. & Tobias, J. A. 2006. Duets defend mates in a suboscine passerine, the warbling antbird (Hypocnemis cantator). Behav. Ecol., 17, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, U., Wickler, W., Kleindienst, H.-U. & Sonnenschein, E. 2002. Structure, geography and origin of dialects in the traditive song of the forest weaver Ploceus bicolor sclateri in Natal, S. Africa. Behaviour, 139, 1237–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutler, D. & Weatherhead, P. 1990. Targets of sexual selection: song and plumage of wood warblers. Evolution, 44, 1967–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shy, E. 1983. The relation of geographical variation in song to habitat characteristics and body size in North American tanagers (Thraupinae: Piranga). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 12, 71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shy, E. & Morton, E. S. 1986. Adaptation of amplitude structure of songs to propagation in field habitat in song sparrows. Z. Tierpsychol., 72, 177–84.Google Scholar
Simpson, B. S. 1984. Tests of habituation to song repertoires by Carolina wrens. Auk, 101, 244–54.Google Scholar
Simpson, H. B. & Vicario, D. S. 1990. Brain pathways for learned and unlearned vocalizations differ in zebra finches. J. Neurosci., 10, 1541–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slabbekoorn, H. 2004. Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P & Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 181–208. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H. & Boer-Visser, A. 2006. Cities change the songs of birds. Curr. Biol. 16, 2326–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H., Ellers, J. & Smith, T. B. 2002. Birdsong and sound transmission: the benefits of reverberations. Condor, 104, 564–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H. & Peet, M. 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H. & Smith, T. B. 2002a. Bird song, ecology and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond, B 357, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slabbekoorn, H. & Smith, T. B. 2002b. Habitat dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution, 56, 1849–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slagsvold, T. 1977. Bird song activity in relation to breeding cycle, spring weather and environmental phenology. Ornis Scand., 8, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slagsvold, T., Dale, S. & Saetre, G.-P. 1994. Dawn singing in the great tit (Parus major): mate attraction, mate guarding, or territorial defence?Behaviour 131, 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1978. Beau Geste has problems. Anim. Behav., 26, 304–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1981. Chaffinch song repertoires: observations, experiments and a discussion of their significance. Z. Tierpsychol., 56, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1983a. Bird song learning: theme and variations. In: Perspectives in Ornithology. (ed. Brush, A. H & Clark, G. A), pp. 475–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1983b. Sequences of song in chaffinches. Anim. Behav., 31, 272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1983c. The study of communication. In: Animal Behaviour. Vol. 2: Communication (ed. Halliday, T. R & Slater, P. J. B), pp. 9–42. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1983d. The development of individual behaviour. In: Animal Behaviour. Vol. 3: Genes, Development and Learning (ed. Halliday, T. R & Slater, P. J. B), pp. 82–113. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1986. The cultural transmission of bird song. Trends Ecol. Evol., 1, 94–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, P. J. B. 1989. Bird song learning: causes and consequences. Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 1, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B., Clements, F. A. & Goodfellow, D. J. 1984. Local and regional variations in chaffinch song and the question of dialects. Behaviour, 88, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B., Eales, L. A. & Clayton, N. S. 1988. Song learning in zebra finches: progress and prospects. Adv. Study Behav., 18, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B., Gil, D., Barlow, C. R. & Graves, J. A. 2002. Male led duets in the moho (Hypergerus atriceps) and yellow-crowned gonolek (Lanarius barbarus): mate guarding by females. Ostrich, 73, 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. & Ince, S. A. 1979. Cultural evolution in chaffinch song. Behaviour, 71, 146–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. & Ince, S. A. 1982. Song development in chaffinches: what is learnt and when?Ibis, 124, 21–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B., Ince, S. A. & Colgan, P. W. 1980. Chaffinch song types: their frequencies in the population and distribution between the repertoires of different individuals. Behaviour, 75, 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. & Lachlan, R. F. 2003. Is innovation in bird song adaptive? In: Animal Innovation (ed. Laland, K. N & Reader, S), pp. 117–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, P. J. B., Lachlan, R. F. & Riebel, K. 2000. The significance of learning in signal development: The curious case of the chaffinch. In: Animal Signals. Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication (ed. Espmark, Y, Amundsen, T & Rosenqvist, G), pp. 341–52. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Publishers.Google Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. & Mann, N. I. 1990. Do male zebra finches learn their fathers' songs?Trends Ecol. Evol., 5, 415–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, P. J. B. & Mann, N. I. 1991. Early experience and song learning in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). In: Acta XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, pp. 1074–80. Christchurch, New Zealand: Ornithological Congress Trust Board.Google Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. & Mann, N. I. 2004. Why do the females of many bird species sing in the tropics?J. Avian Biol., 35, 289–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. G. 1976. An experimental analysis of the function of red-winged blackbird song. Behaviour, 56, 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. G. 1979. Male singing ability and territory integrity in red-winged blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus. Behaviour, 68, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. G. & Norman, D. O. 1979. ‘Leader-follower’ singing in red-winged blackbirds. Condor, 81, 83–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. J. 1977. The Behavior of Communicating. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Soha, J. A. & Marler, P. 2000. A species-specific acoustic cue for selective song learning in the white-crowned sparrow. Anim. Behav., 60, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soha, J. A., Nelson, D. A. & Parker, P. G. 2004. Genetic analysis of song dialect populations in Puget sound white-crowned sparrows. Behav. Ecol., 15, 636–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohrabji, F., Nordeen, E. J. & Nordeen, K. W. 1990. Selective impairment of song learning following lesions of a forebrain nucleus in the juvenile zebra finch. Behav. Neural Biol., 53, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenschein, E. & Reyer, H.-U. 1983. Mate-guarding and other functions of antiphonal duets in the slate-coloured boubou (Laniarius funebris). Z. Tierpsychol., 63, 112–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, J. 1986a. Mixed singing and interspecific territoriality - consequences of secondary contact of two ecologically and morphologically similar nightingale species in Europe. Ornis Scand., 17, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, J. 1986b. Singing strategies in Northern European passerines. Univ. of Joensu Publications in Sciences, 9, 1–21.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, J. 1987. Temporal and spatial differences in traditions and repertoires in the song of the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). Behaviour, 102, 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, J. & Merilä, J. 2000. Response of male bluethroats Luscinia svecica to song playback: evidence of territorial function of song and song flights. Ornis Fennica, 77, 43–7.Google Scholar
Spector, D. A., McKim, L. K. & Kroodsma, D. E. 1989. Yellow warblers are able to learn songs and situations in which to use them. Anim. Behav., 38, 723–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speirs, E. A. & Davis, L. S. 1991. Discrimination by adelie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae, between the loud mutual calls of mates, neighbours and strangers. Anim. Behav., 41, 937–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, K. A., Buchanan, K. A., Goldsmith, A. R. & Catchpole, C. K. 2003. Song as an honest indicator of developmental history in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm. Behav., 44, 132–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, K. A., Buchanan, K. A., Leitner, S., Goldsmith, A. R. & Catchpole, C. K. 2005a. Parasites affect song complexity and neural development in a songbird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 272, 2037–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, K. A., Wimprenny, J. H., Buchanan, K. L. et al. 2005b. Developmental stress affects the attractiveness of male song and female choice in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 58, 423–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staicer, C. A. 1989. Characteristics, use, and significance of two singing behaviors in Grace's warbler. Auk, 106, 49–63.Google Scholar
Staicer, C. A., Spector, D. A. & Horn, A. G. 1996. The dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic signalling. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 426–53. Ithaca, NY, and London: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Stoddard, P. K. 1996. Vocal recognition of neighbours by territorial passerines. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 356–74. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stoddard, P. K. & Beecher, M. D. 1983. Parent recognition of offspring in the cliff swallow. Auk, 100, 795–9.Google Scholar
Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E. & Horning, C. L. 1992. Song-type matching in the song sparrow. Can. J. Zool., 70, 1440–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Horning, C. L. & Campbell, S. E. 1990. Strong neighbour-stranger discrimination in song sparrows. Condor, 92, 1051–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suthers, R.A. 1990. Contributions to bird song from the left and right sides of the intact syrinx. Nature, 347, 473–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suthers, R. A. 1999. The motor basis of vocal performance in songbirds. In The Design of Animal Communication (ed. Hauser, M. D & Konishi, M), pp. 37–62. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Suthers, R. A. 2004. How birds sing and why it matters. In Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (ed. Marler, P & Slabbekoorn, H), pp. 276–99. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Suthers, R. A., Goller, F. & Pytte, C. 1999. The neuromuscular control of bird song. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 354, 927–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suthers, R. A., Vallet, E., Tanvez, A. & Kreutzer, M. 2004. Bilateral song production in domestic canaries. J. Neurobiol., 60, 381–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szekely, T., Catchpole, C. K., DeVoogd, A., Marchl, Z & DeVoogd, T. J. 1996. Evolutionary changes in a song control area of the brain (HVC) are associated with evolutionary changes in song repertoire among European warblers (Sylviidae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 263, 607–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanvez, A., Beguin, N., Chastel, O., Lacroix, A. & Leboucher, G. 2004. Sexually attractive phrases increase yolk androgens deposition in canaries Serinus canaria. Gen. comp. Endocrinol., 138, 113–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchernichovski, O., Mitra, P. P., Lints, T. & Nottebohm, F. 2001. Dynamics of the vocal imitation process: how a zebra finch learns its song. Science, 291, 2564–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchernichovski, O., Nottebohm, F., Ho, C. E., Pesaran, B. & Mitra, P. P. 2000. A procedure for automated measurement of song similarity. Anim. Behav., 59, 1167–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temrin, H. 1986. Singing behaviour in relation to polyterritorial polygyny in the wood warbler (Phylloscopus sibilatrix). Anim. Behav., 34, 146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Cate, C., Slabbekoorn, H. & Ballintijn, M. 2002. Birdsong and male-male competition: causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Adv. Study Behav., 31, 31–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielcke, G. 1969. Geographic variation in bird vocalizations. In: Bird Vocalizations (ed. Hinde, R. A), pp. 310–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thielcke, G. 1973. On the origin of divergence of learned signals (songs) in isolated populations. Ibis, 115, 511–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielcke, G. 1986. Constant proportions of mixed singers in treecreeper populations (Certhia familiaris). Z. Tierpsychol., 72, 154–64.Google Scholar
Thielcke, G. 1987. Langjährige Dialektkonstanz beim Gartenbaumläufer (Certhia brachydactyla). J. Orn., 128, 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielcke, G. 1988. Buchfinken (Fringilla coelebs) eliminieren erlernte Gesänge von Baumpiepern (Anthus trivialis). Die Vogelwarte, 34, 319–36.Google Scholar
Thielcke, G. & Krome, M. 1989. Experimente über sensible Phasen und Gesangsvariabilität beim Buchfinken (Fringilla coelebs). J. Orn., 130, 435–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielcke, G. & Krome, M. 1991. Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs do not learn song during autumn and early winter. Bioacoustics, 3, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielcke-Poltz, H. & Thielcke, G. 1960. Akustisches Lernen verschieden alter schallisolierter Amseln (Turdus merula L.) und die Entwicklung erlernter Motive ohne und mit künstlichen Einfluss von Testosteron. Z. Tierpsychol., 17, 211–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. J. 1999a. Two tests of a stochastic dynamic programming model of daily singing routines in birds. Anim. Behav. 57, 277–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, R. J. 1999b. The effect of variability in the food supply on the daily singing routines of European robins: a test of a stochastic dynamic programming model. Anim. Behav. 57, 365–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, R. J. & Cuthill, I. C. 2002. Body mass regulation and the daily singing routines of European robins. Anim. Behav. 63, 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. J., Szekely, T., Cuthill, I. C., Harper, D. G. C., Newson, S. E., Frayling, T. D. & Wallis, P. D. 2002. Eye size in birds and the timing of song at dawn. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 269, 831–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. 1954. The process of song learning in the chaffinch as studied by means of the sound spectrograph. Nature, 173, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. 1958. The learning of song patterns by birds, with especial reference to the song of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Ibis, 100, 535–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. 1961. Bird Song. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. 1972. Duetting and antiphonal song in birds, its extent and significance. Behaviour Suppl., 18, 1–197.Google Scholar
Todt, D. 1975a. Short term inhibition of outputs occurring in the vocal behaviour of blackbirds (Turdus m. merula L.). J. comp. Physiol., 98, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, D. 1975b. Spontaneous recombinations of vocal patterns in parrots. Naturwissenschaften, 62, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, D. 1981. On functions of vocal matching: effect of counter-replies on song post choice and singing. Z. Tierpsychol., 57, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, D. & Geberzahn, N. 2003. Age-dependent effects of song exposure: song crystallization sets a boundary between fast and delayed vocal imitation. Anim. Behav., 65, 971–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, D. & Hultsch, H. 1982. Impairment of vocal signal exchange in the monogamous duet-singer Cossypha heuglini (Turdidae): Effects on pair bond maintenance. Z. Tierpsychol., 60, 265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, D. & Hultsch, H. 1998. How songbirds deal with large amounts of serial information: retrieval rules suggest a hierarchical song memory. Biol. Cybern., 79, 487–500.Google Scholar
Todt, D., Hultsch, H. & Duvall, F. P. 1982. Behavioural significance and social function of vocal and non-vocal displays in the monogamous duet-singer Cossypha heuglini H. Zool. Beitr., 27, 421–48.Google Scholar
Todt, D. & Naguib, M. 2000. Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv. Study Behav., 29, 247–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomback, D. F. & Baker, M. C. 1984. Assortative mating by white-crowned sparrows at song dialect boundaries. Anim. Behav., 32, 465–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomback, D. F., Thompson, D. B. & Baker, M. C. 1983. Dialect discrimination by white-crowned sparrows: reactions to near and distant dialects. Auk, 100, 452–60.Google Scholar
Trainer, J. M. 1989. Cultural evolution in song dialects of yellow-rumped caciques in Panama. Ethology, 80, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trainer, J. M., McDonald, D. B. & Learn, W. A. 2002. The development of coordinated singing in cooperatively displaying long-tailed manakins. Behav. Ecol., 13, 65–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trainer, J. M. & Parsons, R. J. 2001. Uniformity of long-tailed manakin songs from three localities in Costa Rica. Wilson Bull., 113, 431–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed. Campbell, B), pp. 137–79. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Tschanz, B. 1968. Trottellummen. Z. Tierpsychol. Suppl. 4.Google Scholar
Tsipoura, N. & Morton, E. S. 1988. Song-type distribution in a population of Kentucky warblers. Wilson Bull., 100, 9–16.Google Scholar
Tubaro, P. L. & Mahler, B. 1998. Acoustic frequencies and body mass in New World doves. Condor, 100, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tubaro, P. L. & Segura, E. T. 1994. Dialect differences in the song of Zonotrichia capensis in the southern pampas: a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Condor, 96, 1084–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tubaro, P. L., Segura, E. T. & Handford, P. 1993. Geographic variation in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow in Eastern Argentina. Condor, 95, 588–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, W. C. & Barber, C. A. 2004. Male song sparrows Melospiza melodia do not announce their female's fertility. J. Avian Biol., 35, 483–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallet, E., Beme, I., & Kreutzer, M. 1998. Two-notes syllables in the canary songs elicit high levels of sexual display. Anim. Behav., 55, 291–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallet, E. & Kreutzer, M. 1995. Female canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases. Anim. Behav., 49, 1603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buskirk, J. 1997. Independent evolution of song structure and note structure in American wood warblers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 264, 755–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerman, P. A. 1994. Batesian acoustic mimicry by the regent honeyeater Xanthomyza phrygia. Austral. Bird Watcher, 15, 250–9.Google Scholar
Voigt, C., Leitner, S. & Gahr, M. 2006. Repertoire and structure of duet and solo songs in cooperatively breeding white-browed sparrow weavers. Behaviour, 143, 159–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volman, S. F. & Khanna, H. 1995. Convergence of untutored song in group-reared zebra finches. J. comp. Psychol., 109, 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haartman, L. & Numers, M. 1992. Rain call dialects of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs in the archipelago of SW Finland. Ornis Fennica, 69, 65–71.Google Scholar
Helversen, D. 1980. Structure and function of antiphonal duets. In: Acta XVII Congr. Int. Orn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Waas, J. R. 1988. Song pitch-habitat relationships in white-throated sparrows: cracks in acoustic windows?Can. J. Zool., 66, 2578–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, L. 1986. Divergent character displacement in the song of two allospecies: the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca, and the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Ibis, 128, 251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallschläger, D. 1980. Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds. Experientia, 36, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanker, R., Sugama, Y. & Prinage, S. 2005. Vocal labelling of family members in spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus). Anim. Behav., 70, 111–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, B., Nordeen, E. & Nordeen, K. 2001. Anatomical and ontogenetic factors producing variation in HVC neuron number in zebra finches. Brain Res., 904, 318–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, S. & Slater, P. J. B. 2005a. Heat transfer and energetic cost of singing in canaries Serinus canaria. J. comp. Physiol., 191, 953–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, S. & Slater, P. J. B. 2005b. Raised thermoregulatory costs at exposed song posts increase the energetic cost of singing for willow warblers, Phylloscopus trochilus. J. Avian Biol., 36, 280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, S., Lampe, H. M. & Slater, P. J. B. 2004. Singing is not energetically demanding for pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav. Ecol., 15, 477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, S., Speakman, J. R. & Slater, P. J. B. 2003. The energy cost of song in the canary, Serinus canaria. Anim. Behav., 66, 893–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, F. E. 1977. Intraspecific acoustical interference in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis). Anim. Behav., 25, 949–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, F. E. 1979. The relationship between habitat and song in the white-throated sparrow Zonotrichia albicollis. Condor, 81, 424–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, F. E. & Cigliano, J. A. 1991. Song output and stimulation of the female in white-throated sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 29, 55–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M. 1992. Bird song and operant experiments: a new tool to investigate song perception. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (ed. McGregor, P. K), pp. 201–10. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Weary, D. M., Lambrechts, M. M. & Krebs, J. R. 1991. Does singing exhaust male great tits?Anim. Behav., 41, 540–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M. & Lemon, R. E. 1988. Evidence against the continuity-versatility relationship in birdsong. Anim. Behav., 36, 1379–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M. & Lemon, R. E. 1990. Kroodsma refuted. Anim. Behav., 39, 996–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M., Lemon, R. E. & Perreault, S. 1992. Song repertoires do not hinder neighbor-stranger discrimination. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 31, 441–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M., Lemon, R. E. & Perreault, S. 1994a. Different responses to different song types in American redstarts. Auk, 111, 730–4.Google Scholar
Weary, D. M. & Krebs, J. R. 1992. Great tits classify songs by individual voice characteristics. Anim. Behav., 43, 283–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M., Krebs, J. R., Eddyshaw, R., McGregor, P. K. & Horn, A. 1988. Decline in song output by great tits: exhaustion or motivation?Anim. Behav., 36, 1242–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M. & Mountjoy, D. J. 1992. On designs for testing the effect of song repertoire size. Anim. Behav., 44, 577–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, D. M., Norris, K. J. & Falls, J. B. 1990. Song features birds use to identify individuals. Auk, 107, 623–5.Google Scholar
Weedon, J. S. & Falls, J. B. 1959. Differential response of male ovenbirds to recorded songs of neighbouring and more distant individuals. Auk, 76, 343–51.Google Scholar
Weisman, R. G. & Ratcliffe, L. 1989. Absolute and relative pitch processing in black-capped chickadees Parus atricapillus. Anim. Behav., 38, 685–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisman, R. G., Ratcliffe, L., Johnsrude, I. S. & Hurly, T. A. 1990. Absolute and relative pitch production in the song of the black-capped chickadee Parus atricapillus. Condor, 92, 118–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. J. & King, A. P. 1988. Female visual displays affect the development of male song in the cowbird. Nature, 334, 244–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. J. & King, A. P. 1990. Mozart's starling. Amer. Sci., 78, 106–14.Google Scholar
West, M. J., Stroud, A. N. & King, A. P. 1983. Mimicry of the human voice by European starlings: the role of social interaction. Wilson Bull., 95, 635–40.Google Scholar
Westcott, D. 1992. Inter and intrasexual selection: the role of song in a lek mating system. Anim. Behav., 44, 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westneat, M. W., Long, J. H., Hoese, W. & Nowicki, S. 1993. Kinematics of bird song: functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows. J. exp. Biol., 182, 147–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Whaling, C. S., Solis, M. M., Doupe, A. J., Soha, J. A. & Marler, P. 1997. Acoustic and neural bases for innate recognition of song. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 12694–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, G. 1789. The Natural History and Antiquities of Selborne. London: Chiswick Press.Google Scholar
White, S. J. 1971. Selective responses by the gannet Sula bassana to played-back calls. Anim. Behav., 19, 125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, C. L. 1981. Patterns of singing in the varied thrush: II. A model of control. Z. Tierpsychol., 57, 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, C. L. 1990. Similarity of songs within songbird repertoires: analytic problems. Anim. Behav., 39, 806–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, C. L. & Miller, J. 1983. Song matching in the wood thrush (Hylocichla mustellina): a function of song dissimilarity. Anim. Behav., 31, 457–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickler, W. 1976. Duetting songs in birds: biological significance of stationary and non-stationary processes. J. theor. Biol, 61, 493–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickler, W. 1980. Vocal duetting and the pair bond: I. Coyness and partner commitment, a hypothesis. Z. Tierpsychol., 52, 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. 1982. Song pattern variation in the sage sparrow (Amphispiza belli): dialects or epiphenomena. Auk, 99, 208–29.Google Scholar
Wilczynski, W., Ryan, M. J. & Brenowitz, E. A. 1989. The display of the blue-black grassquit: the acoustic advantage of getting high. Ethology, 80, 218–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, J. M., Goller, F. & Suthers, R. A. 1998. Inspiratory muscle activity during birdsong. J. Neurobiol., 36, 441–53.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, J. M., Williams, M. N. & Suthers, R. A. 2000. Neural pathways for bilateral vocal control in songbirds. J. comp. Neurol., 423, 413–26.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildenthal, J. L. 1965. Structure in primary song of the mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos). Auk, 82, 161–89.Google Scholar
Wiley, R. H. 1971. Song groups in a singing assembly of little hermits. Condor, 73, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H. 1991. Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am. Nat., 138, 973–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H. 1998. Ranging reconsidered. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 42, 143–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H. 2005. Individuality in songs of Acadian flycatchers and recognition of neighbours. Anim. Behav., 70, 237–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H. & Godard, R. 1996. Ranging of conspecific songs by Kentucky warblers and its implications for interactions of territorial males. Behaviour, 133, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H., Hatchwell, B. J. & Davies, N. B. 1991. Recognition of individual males' songs by female dunnocks: a mechanism increasing the number of copulatory partners and reproductive success. Ethology, 88, 145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H. & Richards, D. G. 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 3, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H. & Richards, D. G. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. Kroodsma, D. E & Miller, E. H), pp. 131–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, H. 1989. Multiple representations and auditory motor interactions in the avian song system. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 563, 148–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H., Crane, L. A., Hale, T. K., Esposito, M. A. & Nottebohm, F. 1992. Right-sided dominance for song control in the zebra finch. J. Neurobiol., 23, 1006–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. M. & Slater, P. J. B. 1990. Modelling bird song dialects: the influence of repertoire size and numbers of neighbours. J. theor. Biol., 145, 487–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. M. & Slater, P. J. B. 1991. Simulation studies of song learning in birds. In: Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (ed. Meyer, J.-A & Wilson, S), pp. 281–7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. & Slater, P. J. B. 1993. Does chaffinch Fringilla coelebs song vary with the habitat in which it is sung?Ibis, 135, 202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. & MacRoberts, M. H. 1977. Individual variation in songs of dark-eyed juncos. Condor, 79, 106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. L., Towner, M. C. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 2000. Survival and song-type sharing in a sedentary subspecies of the song sparrow. Condor, 102, 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisniewski, A. B. & Hulse, S. H. 1997. Auditory scene analysis in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): discrimination of starling song elements, their segregation from conspecific songs, and evidence for conspecific song categorization. J. comp. Psychol., 111, 337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenberger, J. F. 1983. A contextual analysis of two song variants in the bobolink. Condor, 85, 172–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolffgramm, J. 1979. Vergleich der hochvariablen Gesangsvorträge benachbarter Amseln. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges., 1979, 237.Google Scholar
Wright, J. & Cuthill, I. 1992. Monogamy in the European starling. Behaviour, 120, 262–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. F. 1996. Regional dialects in the contact call of a parrot. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 263, 867–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. F. & Wilkinson, G. S. 2001. Population genetic structure and vocal dialects in an Amazon parrot. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 268, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, A. 2001. Sex differences in vocal learning in birds. Nature, 411, 257–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasukawa, K. 1981. Song repertoires in the red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus: a test of the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim. Behav., 29, 114–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasukawa, K., Blank, J. L. & Patterson, C. B. 1980. Song repertoires and sexual selection in the red-winged blackbird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 7, 233–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasukawa, K., Boley, R. A. & Simon, S. 1987. Seasonal change in the vocal behaviour of female red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Anim. Behav., 35, 1416–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasukawa, K. & Searcy, W. 1985. Song repertoires and density assessment in red-winged blackbirds: further tests of the Beau Geste hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 16, 171–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ydenberg, R. C., Giraldeau, L. A. & Falls, J. B. 1988. Neighbours, strangers and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim. Behav., 36, 343–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, A. C. & Margoliash, D. 1996. Temporal hierarchical control of singing in birds. Science, 273, 1871–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahavi, A. 1979. Ritualization and the evolution of movement signals. Behaviour, 72, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, A. 1987. The theory of signal selection and some of its implications. In: International Symposium of Biological Evolution (ed. Delfino, V. P), pp. 305–27. Bari: Adriatica Editrice.Google Scholar
Zann, R. 1990. Song and call learning in wild zebra finches in south-east Australia. Anim. Behav., 40, 811–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zann, R. 1993. Structure, sequence and evolution of song elements in wild Australian zebra finches. Auk, 110, 702–15.Google Scholar
Zink, R. M. & Barrowclough, G. F. 1984. Allozymes and song dialects: a reassessment. Evolution, 38, 444–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • C. K. Catchpole, Royal Holloway, University of London, P. J. B. Slater, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Bird Song
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754791.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • C. K. Catchpole, Royal Holloway, University of London, P. J. B. Slater, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Bird Song
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754791.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • C. K. Catchpole, Royal Holloway, University of London, P. J. B. Slater, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Bird Song
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754791.012
Available formats
×