Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T18:10:01.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2024

Edited by
Michael Wiitala
Michael Wiitala
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Boethius’ ‘Consolation of Philosophy’
A Critical Guide
 , pp. 235 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astell, Ann W. 2007. “Visualizing Boethius’s Consolation as Romance.” In New Directions in Boethian Studies, edited by Kaylor, Noel Harold Jr. and Phillips, Philip Edward, 111–24. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, Béatrice. 2003. “Boèce et le Timée.” In Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs: Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac (Paris, 8–12 Juin 1999), edited by Galonnier, Alain, 5–22. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Baltussen, Han, ed. 2013. Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Bark, William. 1946. “Boethius’ Fourth Tractate, the So-Called De fide catholica.” The Harvard Theological Review 39 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beierwaltes, Werner. 1985. “Trost im Begriff. Zu Boethius’ Hymnus O qui perpetua mundum ratione gubernas.” In Denken des Einen: Studien zur neuplatonischen Philosophie und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte, 319–36. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Benevich, Grigory. 2015. “Maximus the Confessor’s Teaching on Providence.” In The Architecture of the Cosmos: St. Maximus the Confessor, edited by Annala, Pauli, Hallamaa, Olli, Lankila, Tuomo, Lévy, Antoine, and Kaley, Diana, 28–46. Helsinki: Luther-Agricola-Seura.Google Scholar
Blackwood, Stephen. 2015. The Consolation of Boethius as Poetic Liturgy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W. 1963. “A Grammatical Approach to Personification Allegory.” Modern Philology 60 (3): 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogan, M. Inez, trans. 1999. Saint Augustine: The Retractations. Fathers of the Church 60. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Bosley, Richard N., and Tweedale, Martin M.. 2006. Basic Issues in Medieval Philosophy: Selected Readings Presenting Interactive Discourse among the Major Figures. 2nd ed. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Brachtendorf, Johannes. 2000. Die Struktur des menschlichen Geistes nach Augustinus: Selbstreflexion und Erkenntnis Gottes in “De trinitate.” Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David. 1999. “Neoplatonic Origins of the Act of Being.” The Review of Metaphysics 53 (2): 383–401.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David. 2006. “Time and Eternity in the Greek Fathers.” The Thomist 70 (3): 311–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, David. 2009. “The Opuscula sacra: Boethius and Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, edited by Marenbon, John, 105–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Samuel, ed. 1906. Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii in Isagogen Porphyrii Commenta. Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum latinorum 38. Vienna: F. Tempsky; Leipzig: G. Freitag.Google Scholar
Breen, Katharine. 2021. Machines of the Mind: Personification in Medieval Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lesley. 1986. “Being in the Sophist: A Syntactical Enquiry.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 49–70.Google Scholar
Brown, Lesley. 1994. “The Verb ‘to Be’ in Greek Philosophy.” In Language, edited by Everson, Stephen, 212–36. Companions to Ancient Thought 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. 1978. The Making of Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bywater, I., ed. 1894. Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabaniss, J. Allen. 1947. “A Note on the Date of the Great Advent Antiphons.” Speculum 22 (3): 440–2. https://doi.org/10.2307/2856875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Margaret. 2009. “Boethius on Utterances, Understanding and Reality.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, edited by Marenbon, John, 85–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. 1980. “The Authenticity of Boethius’ Fourth Tractate, De Fide Catholica.” The Journal of Theological Studies 31 (2): 551–6.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. 1981. Boethius: The Consolations of Music, Logic, Theology, and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. 2001. “Philosophical Tradition and the Self.” In Interpreting Late Antiquity: Essays on the Postclassical World, edited by Bowersock, G. W., Brown, Peter, and Grabar, Oleg, 60–81. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, Harold F. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Kate, and Santo, Matthew Dal. 2008. “Boethius, Gregory the Great and the Christian ‘Afterlife’ of Classical Dialogue.” In The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, edited by Goldhill, Simon, 73–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coughlin, Rebecca. 2017. “Spiritual Motion and the Incarnation in the Divine Names of Dionysius the Areopagite.” In Proclus and His Legacy, edited by Butorac, David D. and Layne, Danielle, 161–73. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. 1943. Les lettres grecques en Occident: De Macrobe à Cassiodore. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. 1967. La Consolation de philosophie dans la tradition littéraire: Antécédents et postérité de Boèce. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. 1968. “Le visage de Philosophie.” Revue des Études Anciennes 70 (1–2): 110–20. https://doi.org/10.3406/rea.1968.3811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. 1969. Late Latin Writers and Their Greek Sources. Translated by Harry E. Wedeck. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. 1970. “Le personnage de Philosophie dans la littérature latine.” Journal des Savants 4 (1): 209–52. https://doi.org/10.3406/jds.1970.1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre. 1980. “La figure du philosophe d’après les écrivains latins de l’Antiquité.” Journal des Savants 1–2: 85–101. https://doi.org/10.3406/jds.1980.1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxon, A. H. 2009. The Fragments of Parmenides. Revised ed. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Crabbe, Anna. 1981a. “Anamnesis and Mythology in the De consolatione philosophiae.” In Atti del Congresso internazionale di studi boeziani (Pavia, 5–8 ottobre 1980), edited by Obertello, Luca, 311–25. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Crabbe, Anna. 1981b. “Literary Design in the De consolatione philosophiae.” In Boethius: His Life, Thought and Influence, edited by Gibson, Margaret, 237–74. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.Google Scholar
Cvetković, Vladimir. 2010. “St. Maximus on Pathos and Kinesis in Ambiguum 7.” Studia Patristica 48: 95–104.Google Scholar
Cvetković, Vladimir. 2011. “Predeterminations and Providence in Dionysius and Maximus the Confessor.” In Dionysius the Areopagite between Orthodoxy and Heresy, edited by Ivanović, Filip, 135–56. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
D’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse. 1956. “Le symbolisme de la Sagesse et le Christ de Saint Dunstan.” The Bodleian Library Record 5: 232–44.Google Scholar
De Filippis, Renato. 2016. “Gli Opuscula sacra di Boezio: Questioni irrisolte e nuove prospettive ermeneutiche.” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 108 (3): 565–96.Google Scholar
De Filippis, Renato. 2020. “Essence and Substance in Boethius.” Chôra 18: 289–304. https://doi.org/10.5840/chora2020/202118/1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vogel, C. J. 1972. “Boethiana II.” Vivarium 10 (1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vogel, C. J. 1981. “Boèce, Consol. II m. 8: Amour grec ou amour chrétien?” In Atti del Congresso internazionale di studi Boeziani (Pavia, 5–8 ottobre 1980), edited by Obertello, Luca, 193–200. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
De Vogel, C. J. 1984. “The Problem of Philosophy and Christian Faith in Boethius’ Consolatio.” In Boethius, edited by Fuhrmann, Manfred and Gruber, Joachim, 286–301. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Den Heijer, Arco. 2014. “Soothing Songs and the Comfort of Philosophy: The Use of Prosimetric Satire and Philosophical Dialogue in Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy.” Hermes 142 (4): 431–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Pilla, Alessandra. 2003. “L’elemento della preghiera nella discussione su prescienza e libertà nella Consolatio philosophiae di Boezio.” In Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs: Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac (Paris, 8–12 Juin 1999), edited by Galonnier, Alain, 507–29. Louvain/Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walther, eds. 1956. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Vol. 1. Zürich: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. 2014. “Dionysius the Areopagite.” In Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance, edited by Gersh, Stephen, 111–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DiRado, Paul, and Wiitala, Michael. 2018. “In What Sense Does the One Exist? Existence and Hypostasis in Plotinus.” In Platonic Pathways: Selected Papers from the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, edited by Finamore, John F. and Layne, Danielle A., 77–92. Gloucestershire: Prometheus Trust.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R., trans. 1963. Proclus: The Elements of Theology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Donaghey, Brian, Kaylor, Noel Harold Jr., Phillips, Philip Edward, and Szarmach, Paul E., eds. 2019. Remaking Boethius: The English Language Translation Tradition of The Consolation of Philosophy. Tempe, AZ: ACMRS Press.Google Scholar
Donato, Antonio. 2012. “Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy and the Greco-Roman Consolatory Tradition.” Traditio 67: 1–42.Google Scholar
Donato, Antonio. 2013a. Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy as a Product of Late Antiquity. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Donato, Antonio. 2013b. “Forgetfulness and Misology in Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (3): 463–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2012.721091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, Antonio. 2013c. “Self-Examination and Consolation in Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy.” Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 106 (3): 397–430. https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2013.0060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, Antonio. 2021. Boezio: Un pensatore tardoantico e il suo mondo. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
d’Onofrio, Giulio. 2001. “La scala ricamata. La Philosophiae divisio di Severino Boezio, tra essere e conoscere.” In La divisione della filosofia e le sue ragioni: Lettura di testi medievali (VI–XIII Secolo). Atti del settimo convegno della Societ’a Italiana per lo studio del pensiero medievale, Assisi 14–15 Novembre 1997, edited by D’Onofrio, Giulio, 11–64. Cava de’ Tirreni: Avagliano.Google Scholar
d’Onofrio, Giulio. 2008. Vera philosophia: Studies in Late Antique Medieval and Renaissance Christian Thought. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Doob, Penelope Reed. 1990. “Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy.” In The Idea of the Labyrinth from Classical Antiquity through the Middle Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, M. V. 2004. “The Problem of Humana Natura in the Consolatio philosophiae of Boethius.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, Myrto. 1994. “Divine Providence in the Philosophy of the Empire.” In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, edited by Haase, Wolfgang and Temporini, Hildegard, Vol. II.36.7: 4417–90. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter. 1994. Verse with Prose from Petronius to Dante: The Art and Scope of the Mixed Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dronke, Peter. 2008. Spell of Calcidius: Platonic Concepts and Images in the Medieval West. Florence: SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo.Google Scholar
Duclow, Donald F. 1979. “Perspective and Therapy in Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4 (3): 334–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/4.3.334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, E. A., Hicken, W. F., Nicoll, W. S. M., Robinson, D. B., and Strachan, J. C. D., eds. 1995. Platonis opera, Vol. 1: Euthyphro, Apologia Socratis, Crito, Phaedo, Cratylus, Theaetetus, Sophista, Politicus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Düring, Ingemar. 1966. Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Durling, Robert M., ed. and trans. 1996. The Divine Comedy of Dante Alighieri, Vol. 1: Inferno. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyke, Heather. 2002. “Tokens, Dates and Tenseless Truth Conditions.” Synthese 131 (3): 329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Mark, Pallis, Dimitrios, and Steiris, Georgios. 2022. “Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Dionysius the Areopagite, edited by Edwards, Mark, Pallis, Dimitrios, and Steiris, Georgios, 1–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Jonathan. 2004. “Boethius on Modality and Future Contingents.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2): 247–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Jonathan. 2018. “Boethius and the Causal Direction Strategy.” Ancient Philosophy 38 (1): 167–85. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil201838110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filandri, Giuliana. 1993–5. “Classicità e Cristianesimo nel nono carme del terzo libro della Consolatio Boeziana.” Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell’Università Degli Studi di Perugia. 1. Studi Classici 17: 57–70.Google Scholar
Foehr-Janssens, Yasmina, and Métry, Emmanuelle, eds. 2003. La fortune: Thèmes, reprèsentations, discours. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Foltz, Bruce, ed. 2019. Medieval Philosophy: A Multicultural Reader. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Fortin, John R. 2004. “The Nature of Consolation in The Consolation of Philosophy.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2): 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 3: The Care of the Self. Translated by Robert Hurley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fowler, Harold N., trans. 1914. Plato: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Loeb Classical Library 36. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, Harold N., trans. 1921. Plato: Theaetetus, Sophist. Loeb Classical Library 123. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Galonnier, Alain. 1997. Anecdoton Holderi, ou, Ordo generis Cassiodororum: Éléments pour une étude de l’authenticité boécienne des Opuscula sacra. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Galonnier, Alain. trans. 2007. Boèce: Opuscula sacra, Vol. 1: Capita Dogmatica (Traités II, III, IV). Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Galonnier, Alain. trans. 2013. Boèce: Opuscula sacra, Vol. 2: De sancta trinitate, De persona et duabus naturis. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Galonnier, Alain. 2016. “Le Chant III, IX de la Consolatio de Boèce comme hymne précatif au seul Démiurge du Timée.” In Lectures Médiévales et Renaissantes du Timée de Platon, edited by Bakhouche, Béatrice and Galonnier, Alain, 89–120. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Galonnier, Alain. 2019. “La dette de Boèce envers le christianisme dans la Consolatio philosophiae: Réalité ou fiction?” In L’Unique Seul Importe: Hommage à Pierre Magnard, edited by Galonnier, Alain, 23–41. Louvain: Peeters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Herrera, Antonio. 1992. “Beatitudo y felicitas en Boecio (Cons. 2).” Habis 23: 283–6.Google Scholar
Geerlings, Wilhelm. 2007. “Christus als Exemplum (Beispielhaftes Vorbild).” In Augustin Handbuch, edited by Drecoll, Volker, 434–38. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gegenschatz, Ernst, and Gigon, Olof, eds. and trans. 1998. Trost der Philosophie/Consolatio philosophiae: Lateinisch und Deutsch. Revised ed. Düsseldorf: Artemis und Winkler.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. 1978. From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. 1986. Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, Vol. 2: The Latin Tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. 2012. “The First Principles of Latin Neoplatonism: Augustine, Macrobius, Boethius.” Vivarium 50 (2): 113–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervaise, François Armand. 1715. Histoire de Boece, senateur romain: Avec l’analyse de tous ses ouvrages, des notes & des dissertations historiques & theologiques. 2 vols. Paris: Jean Mariette.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Mary Louise. 1996. “Introduction.” In Plato: Parmenides, 1–116. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. 1952. Being and Some Philosophers. 2nd ed. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. 1955. History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. 1956. The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. 2002. Thomism: The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Laurence Shook and Armand Maurer. 6th ed. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Glei, Reinhold F., Kaminski, Nicola, and Lebsanft, Franz, eds. 2010. Boethius Christianus? Transformationen der Consolatio philosophiae in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Victoria Emma Clare. 2011. Poetry and Philosophy in Boethius and Dante. Toronto: University of Toronto ProQuest Dissertations.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. 1984. Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Grant, W. Matthews. 2019. Free Will and God’s Universal Causality. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Richard, trans. 1962. Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio. 2020. Anima mundi: La filosofia di Guglielmo di Conches e la scuola di Chartres. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’alto Medioevo.Google Scholar
Gruber, Joachim. 1969. “Die Erscheinung der Philosophie in der Consolatio philosophiae des Boethius.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie Neue Folge, 112 (2): 166–86.Google Scholar
Gruber, Joachim. (1978) 2006. Kommentar zu Boethius De consolatione philosophiae. Revised ed. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaumin, Jean-Yves. 2011. “L’oeil et le regard dans la Consolation de philosophie.” Revue des Études Latins 89: 232–49.Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut. 1984. Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique. Paris: Institut des Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1968. Porphyre et Victorinus. Vol. 1. Paris: Institut des Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1993. Plotinus or the Simplicity of Vision. Translated by Michael Chase. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, Jens. 1992. Der Aufstieg zum Einen: Untersuchungen zu Platon und Plotin. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. 1959. Allegory and Event: A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen’s Interpretation of Scripture. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1965. “Plato and the Mathematicians.” In New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, edited by Bambrough, Renford, 21–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Helleman, Wendy E. 1979. “Augustine’s Early Writings on a Liberal Arts Education.” In Hearing & Doing, edited by Kraay, John and Tol, Anthony, 119–33. Toronto: Wedge.Google Scholar
Helleman, Wendy E. 1990. “Basil’s Ad adolescentes: Guidelines for Reading the Classics.” In Christianity and the Classics: The Acceptance of a Heritage, edited by Helleman, Wendy E., 31–51. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Helleman, Wendy E. 2009. The Feminine Personification of Wisdom: A Study of Homer’s Penelope, Cappadocian Macrina, Boethius’ Philosophia and Dante’s Beatrice. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Helleman, Wendy E. 2010. “Plotinus and Magic.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2): 114–46. https://doi.org/10.1163/187254710x524040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helleman, Wendy E. 2022. “Prayer, Magic and Memory in Plotinus’ Treatise on the Soul (Enneads IV 4 [28], 30–45).” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 1–24. Published ahead of print, October 28, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-bja10021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmig, Christoph. 2020. “The World Soul in Antiquity and Beyond.” In World Soul – Anima Mundi: On the Origins and Fortunes of a Fundamental Idea, edited by Helmig, Christoph, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, August. 1885. Boethius und seine Stellung zum Christentum. Regensburg: Manz.Google Scholar
Hoenen, Marten J. F. M., and Nauta, Lodi, eds. 1997. Boethius in the Middle Ages: Latin and Vernacular Traditions of the Consolatio philosophiae. Leiden: Brill Academic Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, Otfried. 1996. Praktische Philosophie: Das Modell des Aristoteles. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Houwen, Luuk. 2010. “The Beast Within: The Animal–Man Dichotomy in the Consolation of Philosophy.” In Boethius Christianus? Transformationen der Consolatio philosophiae in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit, edited by Glei, Reinhold F., Kaminski, Nicola, and Lebsanft, Franz, 247–60. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1981. “Foundational Investigations of the Phenomenological Origins of the Spatiality of Nature.” In Husserl: Shorter Works, edited by McCormick, Peter and Elliston, Frederick A., translated by Fred Kersten, 222–33. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Huygens, R. B. C. 1954. “Mittelalterliche Kommentare zum O qui perpetua.” Sacris Erudiri 6 (2): 373–427. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.SE.2.304674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Arthur, Walsh, James J., and Williams, Thomas, eds. 2010. Philosophy in the Middle Ages: The Christian, Islamic, and Jewish Traditions. 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad. 2014. Ethics after Aristotle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Werner, ed. 1957. Aristotelis Metaphysica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdain, Charles. 1860. “De l’origine des traditions sur le christianisme de Boèce.” Mémoires Présentés par Divers Savants Étrangers à l’Académie 6: 330–60. https://doi.org/10.3406/mesav.1860.1036.Google Scholar
Jürgasch, Thomas. 2013. Theoria versus Praxis? Zur Entwicklung eines Prinzipienwissens im Bereich der Praxis in Antike und Spätantike. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgasch, Thomas. 2014. “Si divinae iudicium mentis habere possemus: Zu den Formalen Argumentationszielen des Boethius in den Theologischen Traktaten und in der Consolatio philosophiae.” In Boethius as a Paradigm of Late Ancient Thought, edited by Böhm, Thomas, Jürgasch, Thomas, and Kirchner, Andreas, 101–45. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles. 1966. “The Greek Verb ‘to Be’ and the Concept of Being.” Foundations of Language 2 (3): 245–65.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles. 1973. The Verb “Be” in Ancient Greek. The Verb “Be” and Its Synonyms 6. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles. 2009. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kany, Roland. 2007. Augustins Trinitätsdenken: Bilanz, Kritik und Weiterführung der modernen Forschung zu “De trinitate.” Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaylor, Noel Harold, Jr., and Phillips, Philip Edward, eds. 2007. New Directions in Boethian Studies. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Kaylor, Noel Harold, Jr., and Phillips, Philip Edward, eds. 2012. A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 1994. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Andreas. 2002. “Exemplum.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, edited by Mayer, Cornelius, 1174–82. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar
Kijewska, Agnieszka. 2004. “The True and the False ‘I’ in Boethius’ De consolatione.” Mediaevalia: Textos e Estudos 23: 231–40.Google Scholar
Kijewska, Agnieszka. 2014. “Divine Logos in the Heart of Boethius’s Path toward summum bonum.” Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 21: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula, Allhoff, Fritz, and Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash, eds. 2007. Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klingner, Friedrich. 1921. De Boethii Consolatione philosophiae. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Koterski, Joseph W. 2004. “Boethius and the Theological Origins of the Concept of Person.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2): 203–24. https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq200478212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaChance, Paul J. 2004. “Boethius on Human Freedom.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2): 309–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladner, Gerhart B. 1979. “Medieval and Modern Understanding of Symbolism: A Comparison.” Speculum 54 (2): 223–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2854972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamberton, Robert. 1986. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Marilynn. 2005. “Hellenistic Astrology.” In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/hellenistic-astrology/.Google Scholar
Lear, Gabriel Richardson. 2004. Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian. 1991. Time and Eternity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth. 1985. Boethius and Dialogue: Literary Method in The Consolation of Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1964. The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. 1990. The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lluch Baixauli, Miguel. 1988. “Una referencia trinitaria en la Consolatio philosophiae.” In Hispania Christiana: Estudios en Honor del Prof. Dr. José Orlandis Rovira en su Septuagésimo Aniversario, edited by Orlandis, José and Tejero, Eloy, 139–46. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1996. “Representation and the Self in Stoicism.” In Problems in Stoicism, edited by Long, A. A., 264–85. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 1998. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luckner, Andreas. 2005. Klugheit. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luibheid, Colm, and Rorem, Paul, trans. 1987. Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. 1966. Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest, and Alienation in the Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, John. 1989. Boethius on Signification and Mind. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, John. 2002. “Boethius.” In A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, edited by Gracia, Jorge J. E. and Noone, Timothy B., 217–26. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Magee, John. 2003. “Boethius’ Anapestic Dimeters (Acatalectic), with Regard to the Structure and Argument of the Consolatio.” In Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs: Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac (Paris, 8–12 Juin 1999), edited by Galonnier, Alain, 147–69. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Magee, John. 2005. “Boethius’ Consolatio and the Theme of Roman Liberty.” Phoenix 59 (3–4): 348–64.Google Scholar
Magee, John. 2009. “The Good and Morality: Consolatio 2–4.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, edited by Marenbon, John, 181–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, John. 2010. “Boethius.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P.. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magee, John. 2014. “Boethius’s Consolatio and Plato’s Gorgias.” In Boethius as a Paradigm of Late Ancient Thought, edited by Böhm, Thomas, Jürgasch, Thomas, and Kirchner, Andreas, 13–29. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, John. 2016. “Boethius: Last of the Romans.” In Vernacular Traditions of Boethius’s De consolatione philosophiae, edited by Phillips, Philip Edward and Kaylor, Noel Harold Jr., 3–22. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Magnard, Pierre. 1992. Le Dieu des philosophes. Paris: Mame.Google Scholar
Malcolm, John. 2006. “Some Cautionary Remarks on the ‘Is’/‘Teaches’ Analogy.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31: 281–96.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. 2003a. Boethius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. 2003b. “Rationality and Happiness: Interpreting Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy.” In Rationality and Happiness: From the Ancients to the Early Medievals, edited by Jiyuan, Yu and Gracia, Jorge J. E., 175–97. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. 2014. “Boethius’s Unparadigmatic Originality and Its Implications for Medieval Philosophy.” In Boethius as a Paradigm of Late Ancient Thought, edited by Böhm, Thomas, Jürgasch, Thomas, and Kirchner, Andreas, 231–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. 2021. “Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, winter 2021 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/boethius/.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J. 1991. “The Logic of Negation in Boethius.” Phronesis 36 (3): 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Christopher J. 2007. “Denying Conditionals: Abaelard and the Failure of Boethius’ Account of the Hypothetical Syllogism.” Vivarium 45 (2–3): 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Hugh J. 2012. Creation and the Sovereignty of God. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
McCord Adams, Marilyn. 2012. “Evil as Nothing: Contrasting Construals in Boethius and Anselm.” The Modern Schoolman 89 (3–4): 131–45. https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman2012893/49.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Kris. 2009. “Ways of Being.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by Manley, David, Chalmers, David J., and Wasserman, Ryan, 290–319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Robert. 2006. Understanding the Medieval Meditative Ascent: Augustine, Anselm, Boethius, and Dante. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. 1908. “The Unreality of Time.” Mind 17 (68): 457–74.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H. 1998. Real Time II. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micaelli, Claudio. 1995. Dio nel pensiero di Boezio. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Micaelli, Claudio. 2003. “Il De hebdomadibus di Boezio nel panorama del pensiero tardo-antico.” In Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs: Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac (Paris, 8–12 Juin 1999), edited by Galonnier, Alain, 33–53. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. Vol. 1. London: J. W. Parker.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo. 1955. “Cassiodorus and Italian Culture of His Time.” In Proceedings of the British Academy, 1955, 207–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. 1991. “Neoplatonismo e cristianesimo: ‘Partecipare a Dio’ secondo Boezio e Agostino.” In Sicilia e Italia suburbicaria tra IV e VIII secolo: Atti del convegno di studi, Catania, 24–27 ottobre 1989, edited by Pricoco, Salvatore, Nervo, Francesca Rizzo, and Sardella, Teresa, 283–95. Soveria Mannelli: Il Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. ed. 1994. Severino Boezio: La consolazione della filosofia. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. 2003. Varia boethiana. Storie e testi: Nuova serie 14. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. ed. 2005. De consolatione philosophiae, opuscula theologica. Revised ed. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Moreschini, Claudio. 2014. A Christian in Toga: Boethius as an Interpreter of Antiquity and a Christian Theologian. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash-Marshall, Siobhan. 2000. Participation and the Good: A Study in Boethian Metaphysics. New York: Crossroad Publishing.Google Scholar
Nash-Marshall, Siobhan. 2004. “God, Simplicity, and the Consolatio philosophiae.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Barbara. 2001. “God and the Goddesses: Vision, Poetry, and Belief in the Middle Ages.” In Poetry and Philosophy in the Middle Ages: A Festschrift for Peter Dronke, edited by Marenbon, John, 173–96. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Newman, Barbara. 2003. God and the Goddesses: Vision, Poetry, and Belief in the Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzsch, Friedrich, ed. 1860. Das System des Boethius. Regensburg: Verlag von Wiegandt und Grieben.Google Scholar
Obertello, Luca. 1974. Severino Boezio. Vol. 1. Genoa: Accademia Ligure di scienze e lettere.Google Scholar
Obertello, Luca. 1979. “Boezio e la Cosmogonia Platonica.” In La Consolazione della Filosofia. Gli Opuscoli Teologici, edited by Obertello, Luca, 407–16. Milan: Rusconi.Google Scholar
O’Daly, Gerard. 1991. The Poetry of Boethius. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J. 2003. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Jared, ed. 2019. Deification in the Latin Patristic Tradition. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparelli, Maria Chiara. 2007–08. “Un aspetto strutturale della Consolatio Boeziana: La collocazione del carme IX del III libro tra Quadrivium e Geometrica medietas.” Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell’Università di Macerata 40–41: 61–106.Google Scholar
Paxson, James J. 1994. The Poetics of Personification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perl, Eric. 2007. Theophany: The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Philip Edward, and Kaylor, Noel Harold Jr., eds. 2016. Vernacular Traditions of Boethius’s De consolatione philosophiae. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Pieper, Josef. 2001. Scholasticism: Personalities and Problems of Medieval Philosophy. Translated by Clara Winston. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Pletsch, Alexander. 2005. “Der Schein des Guten und das wahrhaft Gute bei Boethius.” In Platonismus im Orient und Okzident: Neuplatonische Denkstrukturen im Judentum, Christentum und Islam, edited by Khoury, Raif Georges and Halfwassen, Jens, 61–72. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Polsky, Elliot. Forthcoming. “The Semantics of Divine Esse in Boethius.” Nova et Vetera.Google Scholar
Porwoll, Robert J. 2008. “‘This Indeed May Seem Strange to Some’: Boethius on the Non-Being and Inhumanity of ‘Evil Men.’” Carmina Philosophiae 17: 57–79.Google Scholar
Powrie, Sarah. 2021. “Addiction and the Reinterpretation of Desire in Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy.” Literature and Medicine 39 (2): 351–73. https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2021.0028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1948. “On What There Is.” The Review of Metaphysics 2 (1): 21–38.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1950. “Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis.” The Journal of Philosophy 47 (22): 621–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2021795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackham, H., trans. 1934. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. 2nd ed. Loeb Classical Library 73. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rand, E. K. 1928. Founders of the Middle Ages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reiss, Edmund. 1981. “The Fall of Boethius and the Fiction of the Consolatio philosophiae.” The Classical Journal 77 (1): 37–47.Google Scholar
Relihan, Joel C. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Relihan, Joel C. trans. 2001. Boethius: Consolation of Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Relihan, Joel C. 2007. The Prisoner’s Philosophy: Life and Death in Boethius’s Consolation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Remes, Pauliina. 2007. Plotinus on Self: The Philosophy of the “We.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Katherin. 1994. “Eternity Has No Duration.” Religious Studies 30 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Katherin. 2004. “Augustine’s Compatibilism.” Religious Studies 40 (4): 415–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003441250400722x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Katherin. 2008. Anselm on Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Katherin. 2011. “Defending Boethius: Two Case Studies in Charitable Interpretation.” International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2): 241–57. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq201151225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Katherin. 2015. Freedom and Self-Creation: Anselmian Libertarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roudaut, Sylvain. 2020. “Forma Dat Esse: Tracking the Rise and Fall of Formal Causality.” History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 23 (2): 423–46. https://doi.org/10.30965/26664275-02302007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Richard. 1989. The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, Joe, trans. 1999. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press.Google Scholar
Santamaria, Anthony. 2007. “In Pursuit of Happiness: The Platonic and Aristotelian Harmony in The Consolation of Philosophy.” Carmina Philosophiae 16: 71–99.Google Scholar
Scarry, Eleonore. 1980. “The Well-Rounded Sphere: The Metaphysical Structure of the Consolation of Philosophy.” In Essays in the Numerical Criticism of Medieval Literature, edited by Eckhardt, Caroline D., 91–140. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Christian. 2006. The Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2009. “On What Grounds What.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by Manley, David, Chalmers, David J., and Wasserman, Ryan, 347–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheible, Helga. 1972. Die Gedichte in der Consolatio philosophiae des Boethius: von Helga Scheible. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1973. “Idealism and Realism.” In Selected Philosophical Essays, translated by David R. Lachterman, 288–356. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schniewind, Alexandrine. 2003. L’Ethique du sage chez Plotin: Le Paradigme du spoudaios. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Schuhl, P. M. 1971. “On Consolation and on Consolations.” In Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan, edited by Palmer, Robert B. and Hammerton-Kelly, Robert, 223–6. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1999. “The Stoic-Platonist Debate on Kathekonta.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina, 128–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta. 1983. “Me quoque excellentior: Boethius, De consolatione 4.6.38.” The Classical Quarterly 33 (1): 277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta. 1984. “The Death of Boethius and the Consolation of Philosophy.” Hermes 112 (3): 352–66.Google Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta. 1986. A Philosophical and Literary Commentary on Martianus Capella’s De nuptiis Philologiæ et Mercurii Book 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta. 2009a. “Haec quibus uteris verba: The Bible and Boethius’ Christianity.” In The Power of Religion in Late Antiquity, 57–78. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta. 2009b. “Interpreting the Consolation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, edited by Marenbon, John, 228–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert, ed. and trans. 1983. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Fate. London: Duckworth Classical, Medieval and Renaissance Editions.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert, ed. 1991. Cicero: On Fate & Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy IV.5–7, V. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert, 2009. “Fate, Prescience and Free Will.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, edited by Marenbon, John, 207–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon-Williams, I. P. 1967. “The Greek Christian Platonist Tradition from the Cappadocians to Maximus and Eriugena.” In The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, edited by Armstrong, A. H., 425–533. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore. 1996. “All the World’s a Stage.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3): 433–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409612347421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, Edmund T. 1939. “Boethius’s Consolatio philosophiae as a Sequel to Augustine’s Dialogues and Soliloquia.” The Harvard Theological Review 32 (1): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siorvanes, Lucas. 2005. “Neo-Platonic Personification.” In Personification in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium, edited by Herrin, Judith and Stafford, Emma, 77–96. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1980. “Time and Becoming.” In Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, edited by Van Inwagen, Peter, 3–15. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Andrew. 1999. “The Significance of Practical Ethics for Plotinus.” In Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honour of John Dillon, edited by Cleary, John J., 227–36. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Smith, Colin C. 2022. “Against the Existential Reading of Euthydemus 283e–284c, with Help from the Sophist.” Ancient Philosophy 42 (1): 67–81. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil202242120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 1983. Time Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 2006. Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 2008. “Graeco-Roman Varieties of Self.” In Ancient Philosophy of the Self, edited by Remes, Pauliina and Sihvola, Juha, 13–34. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speca, Anthony. 2001. Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Mark K. 2014. “The Personhood of the Separated Soul.” Nova et Vetera 12 (3): 863–912.Google Scholar
Stahl, William Harris, Johnson, Richard, and Burge, Evan Laurie, trans. 1977. Martianus Capella and the Seven Liberal Arts, Vol. II: The Marriage of Philology and Mercury. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos, trans. 2007. Proclus: On Providence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, H. F., Rand, E. K., and Tester, S. J., trans. 1973. Theological Tractates. The Consolation of Philosophy. Loeb Classical Library 74. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore, and Kretzmann, Norman. 1981. “Eternity.” The Journal of Philosophy 78 (8): 429–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchla, Beate Regina. 2022. “The Dionysian Corpus.” In The Oxford Handbook of Dionysius the Areopagite, edited by Edwards, Mark, Pallis, Dimitrios, and Steiris, Georgios, 13–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suto, Taki. 2011. Boethius on Mind, Grammar and Logic: A Study of Boethius’ Commentaries on Peri Hermeneias. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Szlezák, Thomas Alexander. 2021. Platon: Meisterdenker der Antike. Munich: C. H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Christine J. 2008. “Speaking of Something: Plato’s Sophist and Plato’s Beard.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4): 631–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, Michael. 1997. Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tränkle, Hermann. 1977. “Ist die ‘Philosophiae consolatio’ des Boethius zum Vorgesehenen Abschluss Gelangt?” Vigiliae Christianae 31 (2): 148–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1583111.Google Scholar
Trapp, Michael. 2007. Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tredennick, Hugh, trans. 1933. Aristotle: Metaphysics, Books I–IX. Loeb Classical Library 271. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Troncarelli, Fabio. 1988. “La più antica interpretazione della Consolatio philosophiae.” Nuova Rivista Storica 72: 501–50.Google Scholar
Troncarelli, Fabio. 2003. “Le radici del cielo: Boezio, la Filosofia, la Sapienza.” In Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs: Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac (Paris, 8–12 Juin 1999), edited by Galonnier, Alain, 421–34. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Troncarelli, Fabio. 2005. Cogitatio mentis: L’eredità di Boezio nell’alto Medioevo. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Twu, Krista. 1998. “This Is Comforting? Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy, Rhetoric, Dialectic & ‘Unicum illud inter homines deumque commercium.’” Carmina Philosophiae 7: 19–36.Google Scholar
Uhlfelder, Myra L. 2018. The Consolation of Philosophy as Cosmic Image. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Uscatescu Barrón, Jorge. 2014. “Boethius’ Glückseligkeitsbegriff Zwischen Spätantikem Neuplatonismus und Christentum vor dem Hintergrund Einer an Gott Orientierten Ethik.” In Boethius as a Paradigm of Late Ancient Thought, edited by Böhm, Thomas, Jürgasch, Thomas, and Kirchner, Andreas, 147–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, Robbert M. 2017. “Proclus and Damascius on Φιλοτιμία: The Neoplatonic Psychology of a Political Emotion.” Philosophie Antique: Problèmes, Renaissances, Usages 17 (November): 149–65. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.289.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, Robbert M. 2021. “Imitation and Self-Examination: The Later Neoplatonists on the Platonic Dialogue as Moral Education through Visualization.” In The Reception of Greek Ethics in Late Antiquity and Byzantium, edited by Xenophontos, Sophia and Marmodoro, Anna, 83–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meeren, Sophie. 2012. Lectures de Boèce: La Consolation de la Philosophie. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1993. “Reply to Reviewers.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (2): 709–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varvis, Stephen. 1991. The Consolation of Boethius: An Analytical Inquiry into His Intellectual Processes and Goals. San Francisco: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Verheij, M. J. O. 2014. “Selves in Conflict: Gill vs. Sorabji on the Conception of Selfhood in Antiquity: A Reconciliatory Review.” The Classical World 107 (2): 169–97.Google Scholar
Wallis, R. T. 1972. Neoplatonism. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G., trans. 1999. The Consolation of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wetherbee, Winthrop. 2009. “The Consolation and Medieval Literature.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, edited by Marenbon, John, 279–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Nicholas P. 1976. Plato on Knowledge and Reality. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1978. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology: Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh during the Session 1927–28. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, Jon. 1987. Allegory: The Dynamics of an Ancient and Medieval Technique. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiitala, Michael. 2010. “It Depends on What One Means by ‘Eternal’: Why Boethius Is Not an Eternalist.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84: 253–61. https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc20108420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiitala, Michael. 2019. “Every Happy Man Is a God: Deification in Boethius.” In Deification in the Latin Patristic Tradition, edited by Ortiz, Jared, 231–52. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Witt, Charlotte. 1989. Substance and Essence in Aristotle: An Interpretation of Metaphysics VII–IX. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zambon, Marco. 2003. “Aristotelis Platonisque sententias in unam revocare concordiam: Il progetto filosofico Boeziano e le sue fonti.” Medioevo 28: 17–49.Google Scholar
Zambon, Marco. trans. 2011. Severino Boezio: La ricerca della felicità (Consolazione della filosofia III). Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Michael Wiitala, Cleveland State University
  • Book: Boethius’ ‘Consolation of Philosophy’
  • Online publication: 23 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009288279.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Michael Wiitala, Cleveland State University
  • Book: Boethius’ ‘Consolation of Philosophy’
  • Online publication: 23 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009288279.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Michael Wiitala, Cleveland State University
  • Book: Boethius’ ‘Consolation of Philosophy’
  • Online publication: 23 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009288279.015
Available formats
×