Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T07:32:03.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2019

Lindsay Mayka
Affiliation:
Colby College, Maine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America
Reform Coalitions and Institutional Change
, pp. 270 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers, Rebecca. 2000. Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca and Keck, Margaret. 2009. “Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil’s participatory water policy.” Politics & Society 37 (2):289314.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca and Keck, Margaret. 2013. Practical authority: Agency and institutional change in Brazilian water politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Acevedo Vélez, Jhon Jairo. 2009. “La planeación nacional y los planes de gobierno: Una mirada al desarrollo social, político y económico de Colombia.” Revista Ciencias Estratégicas 17 (22):291308.Google Scholar
Ackerman, John. 2004. “Co-governance for accountability: Beyond ‘exit’ and ‘voice’.” World Development 32 (3):447463.Google Scholar
Agarwal, Sanjay, Heltberg, Rasmus, and Diachok, Myrtle. 2009. Scaling up social accountability in World Bank operations. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Almeida, Carla and Tatagiba, Luciana. 2012. “Os conselhos gestores sob o crivo da política: balanços e perspectivas.” Serviço Social e Sociedade 109 (January/March):6892.Google Scholar
Almeida, Deborah Resende de. 2013. “Representação política e conferências: Estabelecendo uma agenda de pesquisa.” In Conferências nacionais: atores, dinâmicas participativas e efetividade, edited by Avritzer, Leonardo and de Souza, Clóvis Henrique Leite, 173204. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Altschuler, Daniel and Corrales, Javier. 2012. “The spillover effects of participatory governance: Evidence from community-managed schools in Honduras and Guatemala.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (5):636666.Google Scholar
Alves, Maria Helena Moreira. 1985. State and opposition in military Brazil. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Amengual, Matthew. 2016. Politicized enforcement in Argentina: Labor and environmental regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2002. The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Christopher and Gash, Alison. 2008. “Collaborative governance in theory and practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):543571.Google Scholar
Ansell, Christopher, Reckhow, Sarah, and Kelly, Andrew. 2009. “How to reform a reform coalition: Outreach, agenda expansion, and brokerage in urban school reform.” The Policy Studies Journal 37 (4):703729.Google Scholar
Archer, Ronald P. 1995. “Party strength and weakness in Colombia’s besieged democracy.” In Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy, 164199. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Ronald P. and Chernick, Marc. 1989. “El presidente frente a las instituciones nacionales.” In La democracia en blanco y negro: Colombia en los años ochenta, edited by Vásquez de Urrutia, Patricia, 3179. Bogotá: Fondo Editorial CEREC/Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Archila Neira, Mauricio. 2010. “Protestas, movimientos sociales, y democracia en Colombia (1975–2007).” In Temas y procesos de la historia reciente de América Latina, edited by Lopez Maya, Margarita, Figueroa, Carlos, and Rajland, Beatriz, 119146. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Ariza, M., John, Ursula Giedion, and Adriana Pulido, A. 2007. Hitos centrales en el diseño, implementación y ajuste del POS. Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social, Programa Apoyo a la Reforma de Salud.Google Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2000. Estado federativo e políticas sociais: Determinantes da descentralização. Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo: Revan/Fapesp.Google Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2002. “Federalismo e relações intergovernamentais no Brasil: a reforma de programas sociais.” Dados 45 (3):431458.Google Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2004. “Toward a unified and more equitable system: Health reform in Brazil.” In Crucial needs, weak incentives: Social sector reform, democratization, and globalization in Latin America, edited by Kaufman, Robert and Nelson, Joan, 155188. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2005. “A política da política de saúde no Brasil.” In Saúde e democracia: História e perspetivas do SUS, edited by Lima, Nísia Trindade, Gerschman, Silvia, Edler, Flavio Coelho, and Suárez, Julio Manuel, 285306. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2006. “New public spheres in Brazil: Local democracy and deliberative politics.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (3):623637.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo, ed. 2009a. Democracia, desigualdade e políticas públicas no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: Projeto Democracia Participativa.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009b. Participatory institutions in democratic Brazil. Baltimore and Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press and Woodrow Wilson Center.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo and de Souza, Clóvis Henrique Leite, eds. 2013. Conferências nacionais: atores, dinâmicas participativas e efetividade. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Azevedo, Maria Emília Rocha de. 1986. Bases para o financiamento da previdência social. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Bacha, Edmar L. and Malan, Pedro S.. 1989. “Brazil’s debt: From the Miracle to the Fund.” In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation, edited by Stepan, Alfred, 120140. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagley, Bruce. 1984. “Colombia: National Front and economic development.” In Politics, policies and economic development in Latin America, edited by Wesson, Robert, 124160. Stanford: The Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Bagley, Bruce and Edel, Matthew. 1980. “Popular mobilization programs of the National Front: Co-optation and radicalization.” In Politics of compromise: Coalition government in Colombia, edited by Berry, Albert, Hellman, Ronald and Solaún, Mauricio. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Bailey, John J. 1977. “Pluralist and corporatist dimensions of interest representation in Colombia.” In Authoritarianism and corporatism in Latin America, edited by Malloy, James, 259303. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2005. Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Heller, Patrick, and Silva, Marcelo Kunrath. 2008. “Making space for civil society: Institutional reforms and local democracy in Brazil.” Social Forces 86 (3):911936.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Heller, Patrick, and Silva, Marcelo. 2011. Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barón Leguizamón, Gilberto. 2007. Cuentas de salud de Colombia 1993–2003: El gasto nacional en salud y su financiamiento. Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social, Programa de Apoyo a la Reforma de Salud.Google Scholar
Barrientos, Armando. 2013. “The rise of social assistance in Brazil.” Development and Change 44 (4):887910.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank and Jones, Bryan. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bejarano, Ana María and Leongómez, Eduardo Pizarro. 2005. “From ‘restricted’ to ‘besieged’: The changing nature of the limits to democracy in Colombia.” In The third wave of democratization in Latin America: Advances and setbacks, edited by Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott, 235260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bersch, Katherine, Praça, Sérgio, and Taylor, Matthew. 2016. “State capacity, bureaucratic politicization, and corruption in the Brazilian state.” Governance 30 (1):105124.Google Scholar
Blair, Harry. 2000. “Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries.” World Development 28 (1):2139.Google Scholar
Boin, Arjen and Christensen, Tom. 2008. “The development of public institutions: Reconsidering the role of leadership.” Administration & Society 40 (3):271297.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. 1998. “Organizing Babylon: On the different conceptions of policy networks.” Public Administration 76 (Summer):253273.Google Scholar
Boschetti, Ivanete. 2002. “As forças de apoio e de oposição à primeira proposta de regulamentação da assistência social no Brasil.” Cadernos CEAM – Conflitos de interesses e a regulamentação da política de assistência social 3 (11):1362.Google Scholar
Boschetti, Ivanete. 2006. Seguridade social e trabalho: Paradoxos na construção das políticas de previdência e assistência social no Brasil. Brasília: Letras Livres/Editora UnB.Google Scholar
Bossert, Thomas, Chawla, Mukesh, Bowser, Diana, et al. 2000. Applied research on decentralization of health systems in Latin America: Colombia case study. Cambridge: Harvard School of Public Health, Latin America and Caribbean Health Sector Reform Initiative.Google Scholar
Botero, Sandra. 2015. “Courts that matter: Judges, litigants and the politics of rights enforcement in Latin America.” PhD, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Boulding, Carew and Wampler, Brian. 2010. “Voice, votes, and resources: Evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being.” World Development 38 (1):125135.Google Scholar
Brasil. 1996. Uma estratégia de desenvolvimento social. Brasília: Presidência da República.Google Scholar
Bravo, Maria Inês Souza. 1996. Serviço social e reforma sanitária: Lutas sociais e práticas profissionais. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 1998. “A reforma do Estado dos anos 90: Lógica e mecanismos de controle.” Lua Nova 45:4996.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2008. The judicial response to police killings in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel and Blass, Abby. 2013. “Beyond the façade: Institutional engineering and potemkin courts in Latin America, 1975–2009” [working paper].Google Scholar
Buenahora Febres-Cordero, Jaime. 1995. La democracia en Colombia: Un proyecto en construcción. Bogotá: Contraloría General de la República.Google Scholar
Burity, Joanildo A. 2006. “Reform of the state and the new discourse on social policy in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives 33 (3):6788.Google Scholar
Câmara dos Deputados. 2008. Seminário Constituição 20 anos: Estado, democracia e participação popular. Brasília: Câmara dos Deputados, Comissão de Legislação Participativa.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2012. “Policy makes mass politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15:333351.Google Scholar
Cano Motta, Augusto. 1972. El proceso de la planeación en Colombia. In Lecturas Sobre Desarrollo Económico Colombiano. Bogotá: Fedesarrollo [white paper].Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 2010. “Structural reform and governability: The Brazilian experience in the 1990s.” In Democratic governance in Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy, 338362. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Ruth Correa Leite. 1983. “Movimentos sociais urbanos: Balanço crítico.” In Sociedade e política no Brasil pós-64, edited by Sorj, B. and Tavares de Almeida, Maria Hermínia, 215239. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E., Singer, Matthew E., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., eds. 2015. The Latin American voter: Pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The forging of bureaucratic autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. I. 1995. Conselhos de Saúde no Brasil: Participação cidadã e controle social. Rio de Janeiro: Fase/IBAM.Google Scholar
Castro, Jaime. 1998. Decentralizar para pacificar. Bogotá: Planeta Colombiana Editorial SA.Google Scholar
Ceballos, Miguel and Martin, Gerard. 2001. Participación y fortalecimiento institucional a nivel local en Colombia. Bogotá: CEJA.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel. 1994. Democracy within reason: Technocratic revolution in Mexico. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Cepeda, Manuel José. 1998. “Democracy, state and society in the 1991 Constitution: The role of the Constitutional Court.” In Colombia: The politics of reforming the state, edited by Posada-Carbó, Eduardo, 7195. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Douglas A., Martin, Scott B., and Piester, Kerianne. 1997. “Associative networks: New structures of representation for the popular sectors?” In The new politics of inequality in Latin America: Rethinking participation and representation, edited by Chalmers, Douglas A. et al., 543582. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chartock, Sarah. 2013. “‘Corporatism with adjectives?’ Conceptualizing civil society incorporation and indigenous participation in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 55 (2):5276.Google Scholar
Chavez, Daniel and Goldfrank, Benjamin, eds. 2004. The left in the city: Participatory local governments in Latin America. London: Latin America Bureau and Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Coelho, Vera Schattan P. 2006. “Democratization of the Brazilian health councils: The paradox of bringing the other side into the tent.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (3):656671.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Mahoney, James. 1996. “Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research.” World Politics 49 (1):5691.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research.” World Politics 49 (3):430451.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins and Handlin, Samuel. 2009. “Logics of collective action, state linkages, and aggregate traits: The UP-Hub versus the A-Net.” In Reorganizing popular politics: Participation and the new interest regime in Latin America, edited by Collier, Ruth Berins and Handlin, Samuel, 6192. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Charles. 1988. “Local government and urban protest in Colombia.” Public Administration and Development 8 (4):421436.Google Scholar
Colombia Health Sector Reform Project. 1996. Report on Colombia health sector reform and proposed master implementation plan. Cambridge: School of Public Health, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Comissão de Saúde Previdência e Assistência Social da Câmara dos Deputados. 1990a. Anais do Simpósio sobre Assistência Social. Brasília.Google Scholar
Comissão de Saúde Previdência e Assistência Social da Câmara dos Deputados. 1990b. Anais do Simpósio sobre Previdência Social. Brasília.Google Scholar
Comissão de Saúde Previdência e Assistência Social da Câmara dos Deputados. 1990c. Anais do Simpósio sobre Saúde. Brasília.Google Scholar
Conasems. 2007. Tese 6a do Conasems. Brasília: Conasems.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 1995a. ¿En que va El Salto Social? Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 1995b. Todas y todos somos nación. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 1996. Hacia una ética de lo público. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 1997. Construyendo camino. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 1998a. El Salto Social: La sociedad civil pide cuentas. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 1998b. Trocha nacional ciudadana: La sociedad civil construye nación. Edited by Consejo Nacional de Planeación. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 1999. Planeación participativa: Estrategia de paz. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 2002. Trocha nacional ciudadana: Construyamos entre todas y todos el país que queremos. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 2009a. Balance general del Plan Nacional de Desarrollo, 2006–2010, Reflexión para la planeación. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Planeación. 2009b. Seguridad Democrática y política antidrogas: Reflexión para la planeación. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Conselho Federal de Serviço Social. 2012. Seminário nacional: 30 anos do Congresso da Virada. Brasília: Conselho Federal de Serviço Social.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social. 1995. Relatório final da I Conferência Nacional de Assistência Social. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social. 2008. Relatório 2007. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome and Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social and Ministério da Previdência e Assistência Social. 1997. Anais: II Conferência Nacional de Assistência Social. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social and Ministério da Previdência e Assistência Social.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social and Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social. 2006a. Implicações do SUAS e da gestão descentralizada na atuação dos conselhos de assistência social. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social, and Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social. 2006b. Orientação acerca dos conselhos e do controle social da política pública de assistência social. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1991a. Ata da Quarta Reunião do Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Brasília.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1991b. Resolução 2, April 26, 1991. Brasília.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1992. Recomendações para a constituição e estruturação de conselhos estaduais e municipais de saúde. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1993a. Resolução 89, December 2, 1993. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1993b. Resolução 91, December 2, 1993. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1994a. Resolução 122, July 7, 1994. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1994b. Resolução 137, October 20, 1994. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 1994c. Resolução 148, December 15, 1994. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.Google Scholar
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. 2009. Regimento Interno do Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.Google Scholar
Córdoba, Carlos. 2001. “Planeación participativa para el desarrollo: Sistema Nacional de Planeación y Trochas Ciudadanas.” VI Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, Buenos Aires, November 5–9, 2001.Google Scholar
Cornwall, Andrea. 2006. “Historical perspectives on participation in development.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 44 (1):4965.Google Scholar
Corte, Beltrina and Posso, Camilo González. 1989. Planeación urbana y participación popular en Bogotá. Bogotá: CINEP.Google Scholar
Cortês, Soraya Maria Vargas. 2002. “Construindo a possibilidade da participação dos usuários: Conselhos e conferências no Sistema Único de Saúde.” Sociologias 4 (7):1849.Google Scholar
Cortês, Soraya Maria Vargas. 2009a. “Conselhos e conferências de saúde: papel institucional e mudança nas relações entre Estado e sociedades.” In Participação, democracia e saúde, edited by Fleury, Sônia and de Vasconcelos Costa Lobato, Lenaura, 102128. Rio de Janeiro: CEBES.Google Scholar
Cortês, Soraya Maria Vargas. 2009b. “Sistema Único de Saúde: Espaços decisórios e a arena política de saúde.” Caderno de Saúde Pública 25 (7):16261633.Google Scholar
Cortês, Soraya Maria Vargas, ed. 2011. Participação e saúde no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Cunha, Elenora Shettini Martins. 2009. “Efetividade deliberativa: Estudo comparado de Conselhos Municipais de Assistência Social (1997/2006).” PhD dissertation, Departamento de Ciência Política, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Cunha, Elenora Shettini Martins. 2013. “Conferências de políticas públicas e inclusão participativa.” In Conferências nacionais: atores, dinânmicas participativas e efetividade, edited by Avritzer, Leonardo and Henrique Leite de Souza, Clóvis, 141171. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina. 1994. “Os movimentos sociais e a emergência de uma nova nocão da cidadania.” In Os anos 90: política e sociedade no Brasil, edited by Dagnino, Evelina. São Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina. 1998. “Culture, citizenship, and democracy: Changing discourses and practices of the Latin American left.” In Cultures of politics, politics of culture: Re-visioning Latin American social movements, edited by Alvarez, Sonia, Dagnino, Evelina, and Escobar, Arturo, 3363. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina, Olvera, Alberto, and Panfichi, Aldo. 2006. “Para uma outra leitura da disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina.” In A disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina, edited by Dagnino, Evelina, Olvera, Alberto, and Panfichi, Aldo, 1391. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Dal Poz, Mario Roberto and Pinheiro, Roseni. 1998. “A participação dos usuários nos conselhos municipais de saúde e seus determinantes.” Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 3 (1):2830.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo. 2015. Technocracy and democracy in Latin America: The experts running government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daughters, Robert and Harper, Leslie. 2007. “Fiscal and political decentralization reforms.” In The state of state reform in Latin America, edited by Lora, Eduardo, 87121. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Davies, Emmerich and Falleti, Tulia. 2017. “Poor people’s participation: Neoliberal institutions or left turn?Comparative Political Studies 50 (12):16991731.Google Scholar
de Melo Romão, Wagner, Lavalle, Adrián Gurza, and Guarneros-Meza, Valeria. 2017. “Political intermediation and public policy in Brazil: Councils and conferences in the policy spheres of health and women’s rights.” In Intermediation and representation in Latin America: Actors and roles beyond elections, edited by Zaremberg, Gisela, Guarneros-Meza, Valeria, and Gurza Lavalle, Adrián, 3151. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Resende Chagas, Ana Maria, Augusto Barbosa da Silva, Frederico, Ellery Araújo, Herton, and Maciel Cuiabano, Simone. 2003. A política de Assistência Social e a participação social: O caso do Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social (CNAS). Textos para Discussão. IPEA. Brasília [white paper].Google Scholar
Defensoría del Pueblo and ASDI. 2002. Informe de la primera encuesta nacional de consejos territoriales de planeación 2001. Bogotá: Defensoría del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Della Cava, Ralph. 1989. “The ‘People’s Church,’ the Vatican, and abertura.” In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation, edited by Stepan, Alfred, 143167. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 1983. Cambio con Equidad. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 1995a. El Salto Social: Bases para el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo, 1994–1998. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 1995b. Promoción de la participación de la sociedad civil: del derecho a participar a la particpación efectiva. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 1999. Cambio para construir la paz. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2003. Hacia un Estado Comunitario. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2008. Sistema de Información para la Captura de Ejecución Presupuestal (SICEP) 805. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Doimo, Ana Maria. 1995. A vez e o voz do popular: Movimentos sociais e participação no Brasil pós-80. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Duman.Google Scholar
Donaghy, Maureen. 2011. “Do participatory governance institutions matter? Municipal councils and social housing programs in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 44 (1):83102.Google Scholar
Dowbor, Mónika. 2007. A trajetória do setor de saúde no Brasil pelo prisma de seus principais atores. São Paulo: CEBRAP.Google Scholar
Dowbor, Mónika. 2008. Atores societários, estatais e política pública: a trajetória da assistência social entre 1974 e 2005. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis.Google Scholar
Draibe, Sonia. 1994. “As políticas sociais do regime militar brasileiro.” In 25 anos de regime militar, edited by Soares, Gláucio, Dillon, A. and Celina D. Araújo, Maria. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.Google Scholar
Draibe, Sonia. 2003. “A política social no período FHC e o sistema de proteção social.” Tempo Social 15 (2):63101.Google Scholar
Draibe, Sonia, de Castro, María Helena G., and Azeredo, B.. 1991. O sistema de proteção social brasileiro. Research Report for the Social Policies for the Urban Poor in Southern Latin America Project. Notre Dame: Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2006. “The downside of decentralization: Armed clientelism in Colombia.” Security Studies 15 (4):533562.Google Scholar
Echeverry López, María Esperanza. 2000. “Balance de los procesos de descentralización y participación social en salud en Colombia en la década de los 90.” Revista de la Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública 18 (2):1940.Google Scholar
El Tiempo. 1995. “El gobierno dejó en el limbo el Consejo Nacional de Planeación.” February 15, 1995.Google Scholar
El Tiempo. 2004a. “Alerta del Consejo Nacional de Planeación.” July 11, 2004.Google Scholar
El Tiempo. 2004b. “Consejo de Planeación, alerta por recursos.” July 13, 2004.Google Scholar
El Tiempo. 2004c. “Mandatorios amenazados con revocatoria.” July 30, 2004.Google Scholar
Escorel, Sarah. 1999. Reviravolta na saúde: Origem e articulação do movimento sanitário. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Escorel, Sarah and Arruda de Bloch, Renata. 2005. “As conferências nacionais de saúde na construção do SUS.” In Saúde e democracia: História e perspetivas do SUS, edited by Lima, Nísia Trindade, Gerschman, Silvia, Edler, Flavio Coelho, and Suárez, Julio Manuel, 83119. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Escorel, Sarah, Raimundo do Nascimento, Dilene, and Coelho Edler, Flavio. 2005. “As origens da reforma sanitária e do SUS.” In Saúde e democracia: História e perspectivas do SUS, edited by Lima, Nísia Trindade, Gerschman, Silvia, Coelho Edler, Flavio, and Suárez, Julio Manuel, 5981. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1979. Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1996. “Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy.” World Development 24 (6):11191132.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 2004. “Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (4):3052.Google Scholar
Faleiros, Vicente de Paula. 1986. “Estado e massas na atual conjuntura.” Sociedade e Estado 1 (1):2537.Google Scholar
Faleiros, Vicente de Paula. 1989. “A questão da assistência social.” Serviço Social e Sociedade 10 (30):109126.Google Scholar
Faleiros, Vicente de Paula. 1995. A Previdência Social, o Estado e as forças sociais: A Previdência Social em crise. Brasília: CNPQ.Google Scholar
Faleiros, Vicente de Paula. 2000. Previdência social e sociedade: período 1995–1998. Brasília: CNPQ.Google Scholar
Faleiros, Vicente de Paula. 2004. “A reforma do Estado no periodo FHC e as propostas do Governo Lula.” In A era FHC e o Governo Lula: Transição?, edited by Faleiros, Vicente de Paula et al., 3164. Brasília: Inesc.Google Scholar
Faleiros, Vicente de Paula, de Fátima Senna da Silva, Jacinta, de Vasconcellos, Luiz Cralos Fadel, and Silveira, Rosa Maria Godoy. 2006. A construção do SUS: Histórias da reforma sanitária e do processo participativo. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia. 2010a. Decentralization and subnational politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia. 2010b. “Infiltrating the state: The evolution of health care reforms in Brazil, 1964–1988.” In Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 3862. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia and Mahoney, James. 2015. “The comparative sequential method.” In Advances in comparative-historical analysis, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 211239. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia and Riofrancos, Thea. 2018. “Endogenous participation: Strengthening prior consultation in extractive economies.” World Politics 70 (1):86121.Google Scholar
Faria, Claúdia Feres. 2007. “Sobre os determinantes das políticas participativas: a estructura normativa e o desenho institucional dos Conselhos Municipais da Saúde e de Direitos da Criança e do Adolescente no Nordeste.” In A participação social no Nordeste, edited by Avritzer, Leonardo, 111134. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG.Google Scholar
Filho, Romulo Maciel and Luiz C de Araújo, José Jr. 2002. “Discussing community participation in health: An approach from the Brazilian experience.” Revista Brasileira de Saúde Maternal e Infantil 2 (2):91103.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. 1989. “A tale of two presidents: The political economy of crisis management.” In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation, edited by Stepan, Alfred, 83119. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleury, Sônia. 1987. “Cidadania, direitos sociais e Estado.” In Anais da 8a Conferência Nacional de Saúde: 17 a 21 de março de 1986, 91112. Brasília: Centro de Documentação do Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Fleury, Sônia, ed. 1995. Projeto Montes Claros: A utopia revisitada. Rio de Janeiro: Abrasco.Google Scholar
Fleury, Sônia and A. A. Oliveira, Jaime, eds. 1986. (Im)Previdência Social: 60 anos de história da Previdência no Brasil. Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro: Vozes/Abrasco.Google Scholar
Fleury, Sônia and do Carmo Carvalho Falcão, Maria. 1989. “Assistência na previdência social: Uma política marginal.” In Os direitos (dos desassistidos) sociais, edited by Sposati, Aldaíza, do Carmo Carvalho Falcão, Maria, and Fleury, Sônia, 31108. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Forero, Clemente. 2000. “El Sistema Nacional de Planeación Participativa en Colombia.” ILPES/MEP – Seminario Funciones Básicas de la Planificación, La Habana, Cuba.Google Scholar
Forero, Clemente, Cardona, Guillermo, and Córdoba, Carlos. 1999. Planeación participativa, estrategia de paz. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1996. “How does civil society thicken? The political construction of social capital in rural Mexico.” World Development 24 (6):10891103.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2007a. Accountability politics: Power and voice in rural Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2007b. “The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability.” Development in Practice 17 (4–5):663671.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2015. “Social accountability: What does the evidence really say?World Development 72:346361.Google Scholar
Fuks, Mario, Perissinotto, Renato Monseff, and Souza, N. R., eds. 2004. Democracia e participação: Os conselhos gestores do Paraná. Curitiba: UFPR.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin. 2003. “Thinking about empowered participatory governance.” In Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance, edited by Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin, 342. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Janice. 2017. “The last mile problem: Activists, advocates, and the struggle for justice in domestic courts.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (12):16661698.Google Scholar
Gallón, Gustavo. 2007. “Human rights: A path to democracy and peace in Colombia.” In Peace, democracy, and human rights in Colombia, edited by Welna, Christopher and Gallón, Gustavo, 353411. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social policy expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
García Villegas, Mauricio and Robelledo, Javier Eduardo Revelo. 2009. “La concentración del poder en Colombia.” In Mayorías sin democracia: Desequilibrio de poderes y Estado de derecho en Colombia, 2002–2009, edited by Villegas, Mauricio García and Robelledo, Javier Eduardo Revelo, 328371. Bogotá: Dejusticia.Google Scholar
Gaventa, John and McGee, Rosemary. 2013. “The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives.” Development Policy Review 31 (S1):S3S28.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics.” Political Analysis 2 (1):131150.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician’s dilemma: Building state capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gerschman, Silvia. 1995. A democracia inconclusa: um estudo da Reforma Sanitária Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Gerschman, Silvia. 2004. “Conselhos municipais de saúde: Atuação e representação das comunidades populares.” Caderno de Saúde Pública 20 (6):16701681.Google Scholar
Gilman, Hollie Russon. 2016. Democracy reinvented: Participatory budgeting and civic innovation in America. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Godoy, Mariana Molina and Couto, Eduardo Luis. 2010. O Congresso da Virada de 1979 e o projeto ético político profissional.Google Scholar
Gohn, Maria da Glória, ed. 2001. Conselhos gestores e participação sociopolítica. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011. Deepening local democracy in Latin America: Participation, decentralization, and the left. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2012. “The World Bank and the globalization of participatory budgeting.” Journal of Public Deliberation 8 (2):118.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin and Schneider, Aaron. 2006. “Competitive institution building: The PT and participatory budgeting in Rio Grande do Sul.” Latin American Politics and Society 48 (3):131.Google Scholar
Gómez Vélez, Conrado Adolfo, and Gómez, Helena Sánchez. 2005. El Consejo Nacional de Seguridad Social en Salud en Colombia: Reinstitucionalización y conflicto, 1994–2001. Bogotá: Assalud.Google Scholar
González, Francisco E. and King, Desmond S.. 2004. “The state and democratization: The United States in comparative perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 34:193210.Google Scholar
González-Rossetti, Alejandra and Ramírez, Patricia. 2000. Enhancing the feasibility of health reform: The Colombian case. Cambridge: Harvard School of Public Health, Latin America and Caribbean Health Sector Reform Initiative.Google Scholar
González, Yanilda. 2019. “Participation as a safety valve: Police reform through participatory security in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 61 (2).Google Scholar
Grupo de Economía de la Salud. 2002. “La regulación en el sistema de salud colombiano.” Observatório de la Seguridad Social 2 (6):111.Google Scholar
Grupo de Economía de la Salud. 2007a. “Reforma a la regulación en salud en Colombia: del Consejo Nacional a la Comisión de Regulación.” Observatório de la Seguridad Social 6 (16):112.Google Scholar
Grupo de Economía de la Salud. 2007b. “Reforma a la seguridad social en Colombia, 1993–2007.” Observatório de la Seguridad Social 6 (15):115.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2011. “Time will tell? Temporality and the analysis of causal mechanisms and processes.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (9):12671297.Google Scholar
Gurza Lavalle, Adrián, Voigt, Jessica, and Serafim, Lizandra. 2016. “O que fazem os conselhos e quando o fazem? Padrões decisórios e o debate dos efeitos das instituições participativas.” Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais 59 (3):609650.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco. 2007. ¿Lo que el viento se llevó? Los partidos políticos y la democracia en Colombia 1958–2002. Bogotá: Norma.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob. 2004. “Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98 (May):243260.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob. 2005. “Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment.” In Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen, 4082. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, Pierson, Paul, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2015. “Drift and conversion: Hidden faces of institutional change.” In Advances in comparative-historical analysis, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 180208. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1996. Traditional politics and regime change in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 2016. “Escaping the patronage trap: Comparative party advantage and the transition to programmatic politics in Latin America.” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 1–4, 2016.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1993. “Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3):275296.Google Scholar
Handlin, Samuel. 2016. “Mass organization and the durability of competitive authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Venezuela.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (9):12381269.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan. 1988. The politics of coalitional rule in Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. and Hansen, David R.. 2006. “Dependent civil society: The Círculos Bolivarianos in Venezuela.” Latin American Research Review 41 (1):102132.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue networks and the executive establishment.” In The new American political system, edited by King, Anthony, 87124. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Heller, Patrick. 2001. “Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre.” Politics & Society 29 (1):131163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2004. Courts under constraints: Judges, generals, and presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven. 2006. “Introduction.” In Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America, edited by Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven, 130. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, James. 1985. When Colombia bled: A history of the violence in Tolima. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Hernández A., Mario. 2001. “El enfoque sociopolítico para el análisis de las reformas sanitárias en América Latina.” Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública 19 (1):5770.Google Scholar
Hernández, Mario. 2000. “El derecho a la salud en Colombia: Obstáculos estructurales para su realización.” Revista de Salud Pública 2:121144.Google Scholar
Hernández, Mario. 2002. “Reforma sanitaria, equidad y derecho a la salud en Colombia.” Caderno de Saúde Pública 18 (4):9911001.Google Scholar
Herrera, Veronica. 2017. “From participatory promises to partisan capture: Local democratic transitions and Mexican water politics.” Comparative Politics 49 (4):477499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Veronica, and Mayka, Lindsay. n.d. “Comparing executive and judicial routes to social accountability: Evidence from Colombia” [working paper]Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2000. “Democratizing pressures from below? Social movements in the new Brazilian democracy.” In Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions, and processes, edited by Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy J., 162182. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha. 2016. “Forebearance.” American Political Science Review 110 (2):232246.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha. 2017. Forebearance as redistribution: The politics of social welfare in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holston, James. 2008. Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holzner, Claudio. 2007. “The poverty of democracy: Neoliberal reforms and political participation of the poor in Mexico.” Latin American Politics and Society 49 (2):87122.Google Scholar
Hoskin, Gary. 1998. “The state and political parties in Colombia.” In Colombia: The politics of restructuring the state, edited by Posada-Carbó, Eduardo, 4570. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Calla. 2017. “Disobedient markets: Street vendors, enforcement, and state intervention in collective action.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (11):15241555.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2014. “Making citizens: Brazilian social policy from Getúlio to Lula.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 6 (3):1537.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2014. “Transforming subjects into citizens: Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (4):829845.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
IBGE. 2001. Perfíl dos Municipios Brasileiros – Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais. Brasília: IBGE.Google Scholar
IBGE. 2006. As Entidades de Assistência Social Privadas sem Fins Lucrativos no Brasil 2006. Brasília: IBGE.Google Scholar
IBGE. 2009. Perfíl dos Municipios Brasileiros – Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais. Brasília: IBGE.Google Scholar
Iderena-Fescol. 1986. El libro de los consejos verdes. Bogotá: Iderena-Fescol.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank. 1997. Latin America after a decade of reform: What comes next? Economic and Social Progress in Latin America (IPES). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Jaccoud, Luciana, Hadjab, Patrícia, and Chaibub, Juliana. 2009. “Assistência social e segurança alimentar: entre novas trajetórias, velhas agendas e recentes desafios (1988–2008).” In Políticas sociais: Acompanhamento e análise, edited by IPEA. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Pedro. 1993. Movimentos sociais e políticas públicas: Demandas por saneamento básico e saúde: São Paulo, 1974–1984. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Jaramillo Pérez, Iván. 1997. El futuro de la salud en Colombia: La puesta en marcha de la Ley 100. Bogotá: Fescol.Google Scholar
Jaskoski, Maiah. 2014. “Environmental licensing and conflict in Peru’s mining sector: A path-dependent analysis.” World Development 64:873883.Google Scholar
Jimenez Moriones, Manuel Fulgencio. 2003. Planeación participativa y desarrollo. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Joseph, R. 1999. “Africa, 1990–1997: From abertura to closure.” In Democratization in Africa, edited by Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F., 318. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Anuradha. 2013. “Do they work? Assessing the impact of transparency and accountability initiatives in service delivery.” Development Policy Review 31 (S1):S29S48.Google Scholar
Joshi, Anuradha and Houtzager, Peter. 2012. “Widgets or watchdogs? Conceptual explorations in social accountability.” Public Management Review 14 (2):145162.Google Scholar
Justo, G. 1987. “Santas Casas se incorporam ao projeto.” Proposta Jornal da Reforma Sanitária 1 (March).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo. 2010. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Washington, DC: The World Bank Development Research Group, Macroeconomics and Growth Team.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret. 1992. The Workers’ Party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd edn. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Kinzo, Maria D’Alva. 1990. “O quadro partidário e a constituinte.” In De Geisel a Collor: O balanço da transição, edited by Lamounier, Bolívar, 105134. São Paulo: Editora Sumaré Ltda.Google Scholar
Kinzo, Maria D’Alva. 2001. “A democratização Brasileira: Um balanço do processo político desde a transição.” São Paulo em Perspectiva 15 (4):312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (6–7):845879.Google Scholar
Kosack, Stephen and Fung, Archon. 2014. “Does transparency improve governance?Annual Review of Political Science 17:6587.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus. 2004. “The dilemmas of democracy in the open economy: Lessons from Latin America.” World Politics 56 (2):262302.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolívar. 1989. “Authoritarian Brazil revisited: The impact of elections on the abertura.” In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation, edited by Stepan, Alfred, 4379. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lamprea, Everaldo. 2015. Derechos en la práctica: jueces, litigantes, y operadores de políticas de salud en Colombia (1991–2014). Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.Google Scholar
LAPOP. 2010. Political Culture of Democracy 2010: LAPOP.Google Scholar
Leal Buitrago, Francisco. 1984. Estado y política en Colombia. Bogotá: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Leal Buitrago, Francisco and Dávila, Andrés. 1990. Clientelismo: El sistema político y su expresión regional. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo/Universidad Nacional.Google Scholar
Levcovitz, Eduardo, Lima, Luciana Dias, and Machado, Cristiani Vieira. 2001. “Política de saúde nos anos 90: Relações intergovernamentais e o papel das Normas Operacionais Básicas.” Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 6 (2):269291.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 1998. “Institutionalization and Peronism: The concept, the case and the case for unpacking the concept.” Party Politics 4 (1):7792.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria, eds. 2005. Argentine democracy: The politics of institutional weakness. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria. 2009. “Variation in institutional strength.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:115133.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria. 2013. “Building institutions on weak foundations.” Journal of Democracy 24 (2):93107.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria. 2014. “Building institutions on weak foundations: Lessons from Latin America.” In Reflections on uneven democracies: The legacy of Guillermo O’Donnell, edited by Brinks, Daniel, Leiras, Marcelo, and Mainwaring, Scott, 189213. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan. 2002. “The rise of competitive authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2):5165.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1978. The breakdown of democratic regimes: Crisis, breakdown and reequilibration. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lobato, Lenaura and Burlandy, Luciene. 2000. “The context and process of health care reform in Brazil.” In Reshaping health care in Latin America: A comparative analysis of health care reform in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, edited by Fleury, Sônia, Belmartino, Susana, and Baris, Enis, 79102. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Londoño, Juan Luis and Frenk, Julio. 1997. Pluralismo estructurado: Hacia un modelo inovador para la reforma de los sistemas de salud en América Latina. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano del Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1964. “American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory.” World Politics 16 (4):677715.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo and Soifer, Hillel. 2015. “Surveying state capacity.” In Latin American Public Opinion Project Insights Series: 2015. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Lynch, Julia. 2006. Age in the welfare state: The origins of social spending on pensioners, workers, and children. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Machado, Francisco de Assis. 1987. “Participação social em saúde.” In Anais da 8a Conferência Nacional de Saúde: 17 a 21 de março de 1986, 299305. Brasília: Centro de Documentação do Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. “A theory of gradual institutional change.” In Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 137. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Malena, Carmen, Forster, Reiner, and Singh, Janmejay. 2004. Social accountability: An introduction to the concept and emerging practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Malloy, James. 1979. The politics of social security in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mansuri, Ghazala and Rao, Vijayendra. 2013. Localizing development: Does participation work? Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Maybury-Lewis, Biorn. 1994. The politics of the possible: The Brazilian rural workers’ trade union movement, 1964–1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2016. “Colombia’s surprising resilience.” Journal of Democracy 27 (July):139147.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019. “Society-driven participatory institutions: Lessons from Colombia’s planning councils.” Latin American Politics and Society 61(2).Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019a. “The origins of strong institutional design: Policy reform and participatory institutions in Brazil's health sector.” Comparative Politics 51 (2).Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay, and Rich, Jessica. n.d.Brazil’s participatory infrastructure: Opportunities and limitations for inclusion.” In The new inclusion in Latin America, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Levitsky, Steven and Yashar., Deborah Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [manuscript under review].Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 2010. Wealth, health, and democracy in East Asia and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2011. Voice and vote: Decentralization and participation in post-Fujimori Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2013. “Participatory democracy? Exploring Peru’s efforts to engage civil society in local governance.” Latin American Politics and Society 55 (3):6992.Google Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2014. “Explaining the origin and results of Guatemala’s corporate council system.” Latin American Studies Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, May 22–24, 2014.Google Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2019. Democracy from above? The unfulfilled promise of nationally mandated participatory reforms. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mello, Carlos Gentile de. 1977. Saúde e assistência médica no Brasil. São Paulo: CEBES-Hucitec.Google Scholar
Melo, Marcus Andre. 2008. “Unexpected successes, unanticipated failures: Social policy reform from Cardoso to Lula.” In Democratic Brazil revisited, edited by Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy, 161184. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mendes, Eugênio Vilaça. 1998. A organização da saúde no nível local. São Paulo: Hucitec.Google Scholar
Mestriner, Maria Luiza. 2005. O estado entre a filantropia e a assistência social. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soliders to citizens: The GI bill and the making of the greatest generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and political opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:125145.Google Scholar
Michiles, Carlos, Whitaker, Francisco, Coelho, João Gilberto Lucas, et al. 1989. Cidadão constituinte: A saga das emendas populares. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Ministério da Assistência Social and Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social. 2003. Relatório da IV Conferência Nacional de Assistência Social. Brasília: Ministério da Assistência Social and Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social.Google Scholar
Ministério da Previdência e Assistência Social. 1986. Relatório final: Rumos da nova previdência. Brasília: MPAS.Google Scholar
Ministério da Previdência e Assistência Social/Secretaria de Estado de Assistência Social. 1999. Relatório de Gestão/1999. Brasília: MPAS/SEAS.Google Scholar
Ministério da Saúde. 1987. Anais da 8a Conferência Nacional de Saúde: 17 a 21 de março de 1986. Brasília: Centro de Documentação do Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Ministério da Saúde. 1993. Relatório final da IX Conferência Nacional de Saúde: Municipalizão é o caminho. Brasília.Google Scholar
Ministério da Saúde. 2009. Perfil dos Conselhos de Saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Protección Social. 2010. Encuesta Nacional de Participación Social en Salud.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Salud. 1997a. El municipio, usted y la salud. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud, Subdirección de Participación Social.Google Scholar
Ministerio, de Salud. 1997b. Manual para concertación de planes locales de salud. edited by Subdirección de Participación Social Ministerio de Salud. Bogotá: Ministerio de SaludGoogle Scholar
Ministerio, de Salud. 1997c. Políticas de participación social en salud. Bogotá: Ministerio de SaludGoogle Scholar
Ministerio, de Salud. 1997d. Una mirada nueva a la participación en salud. edited by Subdirección de Participación Social Ministerio de Salud. Bogotá: Ministerio de SaludGoogle Scholar
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome. 2007a. Caderno SUAS. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome.Google Scholar
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome. 2007b. Dados acumulados do Bolsa Família. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome.Google Scholar
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome. 2007c. Sistema Único de Assistência SocialBrasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome.Google Scholar
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome, and Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social. 2005. Anais da V Conferência Nacional de Assistência Social. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome and Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social.Google Scholar
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome, and Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social. 2009. Anais da VII Conferência Nacional de Assistência Social: Participação e Controle Social no Sistema Único de Assistência Social. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome and Conselho Nacional de Assistência Social.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Protección Social. 2010. Encuesta Nacional de Participación en Salud 2010. Bogotá: Ministerio de Protección Social.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael and Norman, Philippa. 2009. “Policy entrepreneurship and policy change.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (4):649667.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael and Vergari, Sandra. 1996. “Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change.” Policy Studies Journal 24 (Fall):420434.Google Scholar
Montambeault, Françoise. 2011. “Overcoming clientelism through local participatory institutions in Mexico: What type of participation?Latin American Politics and Society 53 (1):91124.Google Scholar
Montambeault, Françoise. 2015. The politics of local participatory democracy in Latin America: Institutions, actors, and interactions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara. 2018. Uneven social policies: The politics of subnational variation in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara and Anria, Santiago. 2019. “Participatory social policies: Diverging patterns in Brazil and Bolivia.” Latin American Politics and Society 61 (2).Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Edson. 1997. A gramática política no Brasil: Clientelismo e insulamento burocrático. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.Google Scholar
Nylen, William R. 2003. Participatory democracy versus elitist democracy: Lessons from Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: Studies in South American politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. “On the state, democratization, and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries.” World Development 21 (8):13551369.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (1):5570.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. “Why the rule of law matters.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4):3246.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 2006. “Political institutions and social power: Conceptual explorations.” In Rethinking political institutions: The art of the state, edited by Shapiro, Ian, Skowronek, Stephen and Galvin, Daniel, 931. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Román D. 2006. “La guerrilla mutante.” In En la encrucijada: Colombia en el siglo XXI, edited by Buitrago, Francisco Leal, 323356. Bogotá: Editorial Norma/Centro de Estudios Sociales, Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip. 1998. “Is the century of corporatism over? Neoliberalism and the rise of neopluralism.” In What kind of democracy? What kind of market?, edited by Oxhorn, Philip and Ducatenzeiler, Graciela, 195217. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John and Ansell, Christopher. 1993. “Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (6):12591319.Google Scholar
Paim, Jairnilson Silva. 1988. “A democratização da saúde e o SUDS: o caso da Bahia.” Saúde em Debate 21 (June):3944.Google Scholar
Paim, Jairnilson Silva. 2008. Reforma santiária Brasileira: Contribuição para a compreensão crítica. Salvador and Rio de Janeiro: Edufba/Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Palacios, Marcos. 2006. Between legitimacy and violence: A history of Colombia, 1875–2002. Translated by Stoller, Richard. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Paschel, Tianna. 2016. Becoming black political subjects: Movements and ethno-racial rights in Colombia and Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric. 2008. Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peliano, Anna, de Lara Resende, L. F., and Berhin, Natalie. 1995. O Comunidade Solidária: Uma estratégia de combate à fome e à miséria. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas. Brasília: IPEA [white paper].Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony. 1997. The end of the peasantry: The rural labor movement in northeast Brazil, 1961–1968. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Potyara. 1996. A assistência social na perspectiva dos direitos: Crítica aos padrões de proteção aos pobres no Brasil. Brasília: Thesaurus.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique. 2009. “The politics of institutional innovation: The implementation of participatory budgeting in the city of Buenos Aires.” In Participatory innovation and representative democracy in Latin America, edited by Selee, Andrew D. and Peruzzotti, Enrique, 4061. Washington, DC, and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and the Johns Hokins University Press.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique and Selee, Andrew D., eds. 2009. Participatory innovation and representative democracy in Latin America. Washington, DC, and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and the Johns Hokins University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595628.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy and Samuels, David. 2014. “The impact of participatory democracy: Evidence from Brazil’s national public policy conferences.” Comparative Politics 46 (3):313332.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy. 20012002. “Blairism Brazilian style? Cardoso and the ‘third way’ in Brazil.” Political Science Quarterly 116 (4):611636.Google Scholar
Presidência da República. 2012. “Portal da transparência do governo federal.” Accessed January 12, 2012. www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/.Google Scholar
Procuradoría General de la Nación, and Dejusticia. 2008. El derecho a la salud en perspectiva de derechos humanos y el Sistema de Inspección, Vigilancia y Control del Estado Colombiano en Materia de Quejas de Salud. Bogotá: Procuradoría General de la Nación, Agència Catalana de Cooperació al Desenvolupament, and Dejusticia.Google Scholar
Puente Alcaraz, Jesús and López, Luis Felipe Linares. 2004. “A general view of the institutional state of decentralization in Guatemala.” In Decentralization and democratic governance in Guatemala, edited by Tulchin, Joseph S. and Selee, Andrew D., 231274. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Raichelis, Raquel. 1998. Esfera pública e conselhos de assistência social: caminhos da construção democrática. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Patricia. 2004. “A sweeping health reform: The quest for unification, coverage, and efficiency.” In Crucial needs, weak incentives: Social sector reform, democratization, and globalization in Latin America, edited by Kaufman, Robert R. and Nelson, Joan M., 124154. Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center and Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Resende, Luis Fernando de Lara. 2000. Comunidade Solidária: uma alternativa aos fundos sociais. Texto para Discussão. Brasília: IPEA [white paper].Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 2006. “Policy network analysis.” In The Oxford handbook of public policy, edited by Moran, Michale, Rein, Martin, and Goodin, Robert E., 425447. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2013. “Grassroots bureaucracy: Intergovernmental relations and popular mobilization in Brazil’s AIDS policy sector.” Latin American Politics and Society 55 (2):125.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica, Mayka, Lindsay, and Montero, Alfred. 2019. “The politics of participation in Latin America: New actors and institutions.” Latin American Politics and Society 61 (2).Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2019a “Making national participatory institutions work: Bureaucrats, activists, and AIDS policy in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 61(2).Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2019b. State-sponsored activism: Bureaucrats and social movements in democratic Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2020. “Organizing 21st-century activism: From structure to strategy in Latin American social movements.” Latin American Research Review 55 (3).Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth. 1998. Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Neto, Eleutério. 1997. “A via do parlamento.” In Saúde e democracia: a luta do Cebes, edited by Fleury, Sônia Maria, 6391. São Paulo: Lemos.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Neto, Eleutério, Gomes Temporão, José, and Escorel, Sarah. 2003. Saúde: Promessa e limites da constituição. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César and Rodríguez-Franco, Diana. 2015. Radical deprivation on trial: The impact of judicial activism on socioeconomic rights in the global south. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 2010. “How inference in the social (but not physical) sciences neglects theoretical anomaly.” In Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards, edited by Brady, Henry and Collier, David, 8997. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Rojas Couto, Berenice. 2009. “O Sistema Único de Assistência Social: uma nova forma de gestão da assistência social.” In Concepção e gestão da proteção social não contribuitiva no Brasil, 205218. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome.Google Scholar
Sader, Éder. 1988. Quando novos personagens entram em cena: Experiências, falas e lutas dos trabalhadores da grande São Paulo, 1970–80. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Saffioti, Heleieth Iara Bongiovani. 1987. “Feminismos e seus frutos no Brasil.” In Movimentos sociais na transição democrática, edited by Sader, Emir, 105158. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Santana Rodríguez, Pedro. 1983. Desarrollo regional y paros cívicos en Colombia. Bogotá: CINEP.Google Scholar
Santos, Lenir and de Andrade, Luiz Odocrico Monteiro. 2007. SUS: O espaço da gestão inovada e dos consensos interfederativos: Aspectos jurídicos, administrativos e financeiros. Brasília and Campinas: Conasems and Instituto de Direito Sanitário Aplicado.Google Scholar
Santos, Wanderley Guilherme dos. 1979. Cidadania e justiça: A política social na ordem Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1935. Politics, pressure, and the tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the century of corporatism?World Politics 36 (1):85131.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Secretaria Nacional de Assistência Social. 2004. Política Nacional de Assistência Social. Brasília: Ministério de Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome.Google Scholar
Secretaria-Geral da Presidência da República – Secretaria Nacional de Articulação Social. 2010. Conferencias Nacionais Realizadas (1941–2010). Brasília.Google Scholar
Selee, Andrew D. 2009. “An alternative to clientelism? Participatory innovation in Mexico.” In Participatory innovation and representative democracy in Latin America, edited by Selee, Andrew D. and Peruzzotti, Enrique, 6288. Washington, DC and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and the Johns Hokins University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1949. TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1957. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth. 2002. “Orphaned by democracy: Small industry in contemporary Mexico.” Comparative Politics 35 (1):4362.Google Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. 2003. “Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development.” Studies in American Political Development 17 (Fall):185203.Google Scholar
Sistema Nacional de Planeación. 1995. Constitución Social del Sistema Nacional de Planeación. Bogotá: Consejo Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E. 1988. The politics of military rule in Brazil, 1964–85. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E. 1989. “Brazil’s slow road to democratization: 1974–1989.” In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation, edited by Stepan, Alfred, 542. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Souza, Celina. 1997. Constitutional engineering in Brazil: The politics of federalism and decentralization. London: MacMillan Press LTD.Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo and Tommasi, Mariano. 2007. The institutional foundations of public policy: A transactions theory and an application to Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sposati, Aldaíza. 2007. A menina LOAS: Um processo de construção da assistência social. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Sposati, Aldaíza, Bonetti, Dilsea Adeodata, Yazbek, Maria Carmelita, and do Carmo Carvalho Falcão, Maria. 1992. Assistência na trajetória das política sociais brasileiras. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Sposati, Aldaíza and do Carmo Carvalho Falcão, Maria. 1989. LBA: Identidade e efetividade das ações no enfrentamento da pobreza Brasileira. São Paulo: EDUC.Google Scholar
Sposati, Aldaíza, Falcão, Maria do Carmo Carvalho, and Fleury, Sônia, eds. 1989. Os direitos (dos desassistidos) sociais. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, ed. 1973. Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, policies, and future. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2004. “Toward a new comparative politics of federalism, multinationalism, and democracy: Beyond Rikerian federalism.” In Federalism and democracy in Latin America, edited by Gibson, Edward, 2984. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. “Social structure and organizations.” In Handbook of organizations, edited by March, James G., 142193. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99 (3):315325.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2005. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2013. Diffusion of good government: Social sector reforms in Brazil. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges and Hunter, Wendy. 2013. “Whither clientelism? Good governance and Brazil’s Bolsa Família program.” Comparative Politics 46 (1):4362.Google Scholar
Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos. 2009. Base de Datos de los Comités de Desarrollo y Control Social y Vocales de Control 2009. Bogotá: Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos.Google Scholar
Tatagiba, Luciana. 2002. “Os conselhos gestores e a democratização das políticas públicas no Brasil.” In Sociedade civil e espaços públicos no Brasil, edited by Dagnino, Evelina, 47103. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ana Claudia, and do Carmo Albuquerque, Maria. 2006. “Orçamentos participativos: Projetos políticos, partilha de poder e alcance democrático.” In A disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina, edited by Dagnino, Evelina, Olvera, Alberto, and Panfichi, Aldo, 179228. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Elenaldo Celso. 1996. “Movimentos sociais e conselhos.” Cadernos ABONG 15:720.Google Scholar
Telles, Vera da Silva. 1994. “A sociedade civil e a construção de um espaço público.” In Os anos 90: Política e sociedade no Brasil, edited by Dagnino, Evelina. São Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Tendler, Judith. 1997. Good government in the tropics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis.” In Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 208240. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Touchton, Michael and Wampler, Brian. 2013. “Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions.” Comparative Political Studies 20 (10):128.Google Scholar
Touchton, Michael, Sugiyama, Natasha Borges, and Wampler, Brian. 2017. “Democracy at work: Moving beyond elections to improve well-being.” American Political Science Review 111 (1):6882.Google Scholar
Tranjan, J. Ricardo. 2016. Participatory democracy in Brazil: Socioeconomic and political origins. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Transparencia por Colombia. 2005. 2004 Índice de Transparencia Municipal. Bogotá: edited by Transparencia por Colombia.Google Scholar
Tribunal de Contas da União. 2009. Orientações para conselhos da área de assistência social, 2a edição atualizada e ampliada. Brasília: Tribunal de Contas da União.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism, and multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (3):289325.Google Scholar
Ungar, Elizabeth. 1981. Las Juntas de Acción Comunal en Colombia: Un diagnóstico sobre su desarrollo, actividades, logros y necesidades. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes, Departamento de Ciencia Política.Google Scholar
Uribe, Juan Pablo. 2004. “The influence of foreign models on health reform in Colombia.” In Learning from foreign models in Latin American policy reform, edited by Weyland, Kurt, 196218. Washington and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center and Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Velásquez, Fabio. 1995a. “Descentralización y modernización del Estado en Colombia: Balance de una experiencia.” Revista Nómadas 3.Google Scholar
Velásquez, Fabio. 1995b. “La descentralización en Colombia: Antecedentes, desarrollos y perspectivas.” In ¿Descentralizar en América Latina? Gestión urbana, Vol. 3, edited by Werner Hass, J. and Rosenfeld, A.. Quito: GTZ/PGU, Sociedad Alemana de Cooperación Técnica/Programa de Gestión Urbana.Google Scholar
Velásquez, Fabio. 1995c. “La Planeación en Colombia: ¿Es el tiempo de la gente?Revista Foro 26: 1424.Google Scholar
Velásquez, Fabio. 2002. “Participación y governabilidad: La experiencia de planeación participativa en Cali.” In Planeación, participación y desarrollo, edited by Escobar, Arturo. Medellín: Corporación Región.Google Scholar
Velásquez, Fabio and González, Esperanza. 2003. ¿Qué ha pasado con la participación ciudadana en Colombia? Bogotá: Fundación Corona.Google Scholar
Velásquez, Fabio and González, Esperanza. 2011. La planeación participativa, el Sistema Nacional de Planeación y los presupuestos participativos en Colombia. Bogotá: Fundación Foro por Colombia.Google Scholar
Villarreal Barón, José Miguel. 1998. La planeación local: Espacios para la participación ciudadana y comunitaria. Bogotá: Rodari Editores.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2004. “Expanding accountability through participatory institutions: Mayors, citizens, and budgeting in three Brazilian municipalities.” Latin American Politics and Society 46 (2):7399.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2007. Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation and accountability. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2008. “When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil.” Comparative Politics 41 (1):6182.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2009. “Following in the footsteps of policy entrepreneurs: Policy advocates and pro forma adopters.” Journal of Development Studies 45 (4):572592.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2015. Activating democracy in Brazil: Popular participation, social justice, and interlocking institutions. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian and Avritzer, Leonardo. 2004. “Participatory publics: Civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil.” Comparative Politics 36 (3):291312.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret. 2006. “When does politics create policy? The organizational politics of change.” In Rethinking political institutions: The art of the state, edited by Shapiro, Ian, Skowronek, Stephen, and Galvin, Daniel, 171186. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1993. “The rise and fall of President Collor.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 35 (1):337.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy without equity: Failures of reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, Susan. 2012. What have been the impacts of World Bank community-driven development programs? CDD impact evaluation review and operational and research implications. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2004. World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2014. World Bank Governance Indicators 2014. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yaffee, Steven, and Wondolleck, Julia. 2003. “Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: Evolution and challenges.” Environments 31 (2):5972.Google Scholar
Yazbek, Maria Carmelita. 1995. “A assistência social no contexto da Medida Provisória no. 813.” Serviço Social e Sociedade 16 (47):151153.Google Scholar
Yazbek, Maria Carmelita. 2004. “As ambigüidades da Assistência Social Brasileira após dez anos de LOAS.” Serviço Social e Sociedade 25 (77):1129.Google Scholar
Yepes, Francisco J., Ramírez, Manuel, Sánchez, Luz Helena, Ramírez, Marta Lucía, and Jaramillo, Ivan. 2010. Luces y sombras de la reforma de la salud en Colombia. Bogotá: Assalud and IDRC.Google Scholar
Zamosc, Leon. 1986. The agrarian question and the peasant movement in Colombia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Lindsay Mayka, Colby College, Maine
  • Book: Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America
  • Online publication: 01 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108598927.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Lindsay Mayka, Colby College, Maine
  • Book: Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America
  • Online publication: 01 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108598927.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Lindsay Mayka, Colby College, Maine
  • Book: Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America
  • Online publication: 01 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108598927.009
Available formats
×