The Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme: design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511584466.003

2 - The Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme: design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2009

Edited by

Debra Pepler and

Dan Olweus: Affiliation:
Research Center for Health promotion (HEMIL), University of Bergen, Norway, Dan.Olweus@psych.uib.no
Peter K. Smith: Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London
Debra Pepler: Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Ken Rigby: Affiliation:
University of South Australia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The need for evidence-based intervention programmes

As bully/victim problems have gradually been placed on the official school agenda in many countries, a number of suggestions about their handling and prevention have been proposed. Some of these suggestions and approaches seem ill-conceived or maybe even counter-productive, such as an excessive focus on changing the victims' behaviour to make them less vulnerable to bullying. Others appear meaningful and potentially useful. A key problem, however, is that most of them have either failed to document positive results or have never been subjected to systematic research evaluation. Therefore it is difficult to know which programmes or measures actually work and which do not. Yet it is the results with the students that count, not how adults might feel about using the programme (user satisfaction).

The situation is well illustrated by the following facts. Recently, a US expert committee under the leadership of a respected criminologist, Professor Delbert Elliott, made a systematic evaluation of more than 400 presumably violence- (or problem-behaviour) preventing programmes according to certain minimum-level criteria (Elliott, 1999). These criteria were:

that the programme had had positive effects on relevant target groups (students in this case) in a relatively rigorous scientific evaluation;
that the effects had lasted for at least one year; and,
that the programme had produced positive results in at least one site beyond the original one.

Only ten of the programmes (four of which are school-based and only one focusing on bully/victim problems) satisfied the specified criteria.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Bullying in Schools
How Successful Can Interventions Be?
, pp. 13 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584466.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualist framework for intervention research. Reno, Nev.: Context Press

Bryk, A. S. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. London: Sage

Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28, 15–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Chicago: Rand McNally

Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., and Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–64CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Elliott, D. (1999). Editor's introduction. In D. Olweus and S. Limber, Blueprints for violence prevention: Bullying Prevention Program. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA

Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College

Fullan, M. (1998). The meaning of educational change: A quarter of a century of learning. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, and D. Hopkins (eds.), International handbook of educational change. London: KluwerCrossRef

Goldstein, H. I. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Oxford University Press

Gottfredson, G. D. (1987). Peer group interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior: A selective review and a new evaluation. Criminology, 25, 671–714CrossRef Google Scholar

Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times – teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell

Kallestad, J. H. and Olweus, D. (2003). Predicting teachers' and schools' implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A multilevel study. Prevention and Treatment, 6, Article 21. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.journals.apa.org/prevention/volume6/pre0060021a.htmlCrossRef

Kallestad, J. H., Olweus, D., and Alsaker, F. (1998). School climate reports from Norwegian teachers: A methodological and substantive study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 70–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Corday, H. Hartman, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, and F. Mosteller (eds.) Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 83–125

Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 509–36Google Scholar

Olweus D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. Pepler and K. Rubin (eds.) The development and treatment of childhood aggression Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 411–48

Olweus D. (1993a). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell

Olweus D.(1993b). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In K. H. Rubin and J. B. Asendorf (eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 315–42

Olweus, D. (1994). Annotation: Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1171–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Olweus D.(1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Mimeo. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion, University of Bergen

Olweus D.(1999a). Noen hovedresultater fra Det nye Bergensprosjektet mot mobbing og antisosial atferd. [Some key results from The New Bergen Project against Bullying and Antisocial Behaviour.] MS. HEMIL-senteret, Universitetet i Bergen

Olweus D.(1999b). Norway. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, and P. Slee (eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 28–48

Olweus D.(1999c). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, and P. Slee (eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 7–27

Olweus D.(2001a). Antimobbingsprosjekt i Oslo-skoler med meget gode resultater [Anti-bullying project in Oslo schools with quite positive results]. MS. HEMIL Center, University of Bergen

Olweus D.(2001b). Olweus' core program against bullying and antisocial behavior: A teacher handbook. Research Center for Health Promotion Bergen, Norway

Olweus D.(2002). Efterskrift (Postscript). In E. Menckel (Ed.), Vänskap vinner: Om mobbning ock kränkande behandling i skolan (Friendship wins: About bullying and insulting treatment in school). Halmstad, Sweden: Högskolan i Halmstad., pp. 55–59

Olweus D.(2004). Bullying at school: Prevalence estimation, a useful evaluation design, and a new national initiative in Norway. In D. Galloway (ed.), Occasional Paper No. 23, Bullying in Schools. London: Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Olweus, D. and Alsaker, F. D. (1991). Assessing change in a cohort longitudinal study with hierarchical data. In D. Magnusson, L. R. Bergman, G. Rudinger, and B. Törestad (eds.), Problems and methods in longitudinal research. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–32CrossRef

Olweus, D. and Limber, S. (1999). Blueprints for violence prevention: Bullying Prevention Program. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA; see also www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints

Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. 2nd edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Porter, A. C. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Analysis of covariance: Its model and use in psychological research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 383–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Rapport 2000. (2000). Vurdering av program og tiltak for å redusere problematferd og utvikle sosial kompetanse. [Evaluation of programs and measures to reduce problem behavior and develop social competence.] Oslo, Norway: Kirke-, undervisnings-, og forskningsdepartementet

Roland, E. (1989). Bullying: The Scandinavian research tradition. In D. P. Tattum and D. A. Lane (eds.), Bullying in schools. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham, pp. 21–32

Smith, P. K., Madsen, K. C., and Moody, J. C. (1999). What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied at school? Towards a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied. Educational Research, 41, 267–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, P. K. and Sharp, S. (eds.) (1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge

Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., and Slee, P. (1999) (eds.). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. London: Routledge

Smylie, M. A. (1990). Teacher efficacy at work. In P. Reyes (ed.), Teachers and their workplace. London: Sage, pp. 48–66

Solberg, M. and Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Stevens, V., Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Oost, P. (2000). Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti-bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 195–210CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.