Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar
- The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors’ Biographies
- Journal Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Literature and Politics
- Part II Genre, Rhetoric, Language, and Style
- Part III Fragmentary Works
- Part IV Sources and Nachleben
- Bibliography
- Index Rerum
- Index Locorum
- Index Personarum
- Cambridge Companions to…
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar
- The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors’ Biographies
- Journal Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Literature and Politics
- Part II Genre, Rhetoric, Language, and Style
- Part III Fragmentary Works
- Part IV Sources and Nachleben
- Bibliography
- Index Rerum
- Index Locorum
- Index Personarum
- Cambridge Companions to…
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar , pp. 333 - 371Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abbott, K. M. (1962) “O dimidiate Menander: an echo from a Roman schoolroom?” CJ 57: 241–51.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1973) “The vocabulary of the speeches in Tacitus’ historical works,” BICS 20: 124–44.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2005) “The Bellum Africum,” in Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, eds. Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M., and Adams, J. N.. Oxford: 73–96.Google Scholar
Albert, S. (1980) Bellum iustum: die Theorie des “gerechten Krieges” und ihre praktische Bedeutung für die auswärtigen Auseinandersetzungen Roms in republikanischer Zeit. Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von (1997) A History of Roman Literature. From Livius Andronicus to Boethius. Leiden.Google Scholar
Alföldi, A. (1985) Caesar in 44 v. Chr, vol. 1: Studien zu Caesars Monarchie und ihren Wurzeln, eds. Wollf, H., Alföldi-Rosenbaum, E., and Stumpf, G.. Bonn.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Jr. (1955) “The British epics of Quintus and Marcus Cicero,” TAPA 86: 143–59.Google Scholar
Ames, C. (2003–4) “La Construcción del Bárbaro en la obra de Julio César,” Auster 8–9: 111–25.Google Scholar
Anderson, R., Parsons, P., and Nisbet, R. (1979) “Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrim,” JRS 69: 125–55.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1963) Pompey, His Friends, and the Literature of the First Century BC. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Andrewes, M. (1937) “Caesar’s use of tense sequence in indirect speech,” CR 51: 114–16.Google Scholar
Andrewes, M. (1951) “The function of tense variation in the subjunctive mood of oratio obliqua,” CR 1: 142–6.Google Scholar
Andrieu, J. (1949) “La division en livres et les mentions dʼauteur dans le corpus Césarien,” REL 27: 138–49.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. E. (1992) “The persuasive style of debates in direct speech in Thucydides,” Hermes 120: 44–57.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (1999) Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Avila y Zúñiga, L. de (1552) Comentario del illustre señor don Luis de Auila y Çuñiga de la Guerra de Alemaña. Venice.Google Scholar
Babcock, B. (1978) Introduction to the Reversible World. Symbolic Inversion in Art and Society. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Bachelier, E. (1959) “Les Druides en Gaule romaine: I: Les Druides avant la conquête; II: Les Druides après la conquête; III: Le druidisme au IVe siècle,” Ogam 11: 46–55; 173–184; 295–304.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1974) “The attempt to try Caesar,” in Polis and Imperium: Studies in Honour of Edward Togo Salmon, ed. Evans, J. A. S.. Toronto: 145–66.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. and van den Berg, C. (eds.) (2013) “Intertextuality: introduction,” AJP 134.1: 1–8.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001) “The crossing,” in Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature, ed. Harrison, S.. Oxford: 142–63.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. (1998) “Noble Gauls and their other in Caesar’s propaganda,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter:The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. London and Swansea: 139–70.Google Scholar
Barrès, J.-B. (1988) Memoirs of a French Napoleonic Officer, ed. Barrès, M., trans. Miall, B.. London.Google Scholar
Bartley, A. (2008) “The use of rhetoric in Xenophon’s Anabasis and Caesar’s De bello Gallico,” LEC 76: 361–81.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1997) Ideology in Cold Blood. A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bates, R. L. (1983) Memoirs and the Perception of History in the Roman Republic. Diss. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Batinski, E. E. (1992) “Lucan’s catalogue of Caesar’s troops: paradox and convention,” CJ 88: 19–24.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. (1991) “A narrative Gestalt and the force of Caesar’s plain style,” Mnemosyne 44: 126–36.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. (2010) “Caesar’s Republican rhetoric and the veils of autocracy,” in Cesare: precursore o visionario? ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 181–205.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2007) “The early Roman tradition,” in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J.. Malden: 259–65.Google Scholar
Beck, H. and Walter, U. (2002) Die frühen römischen Historiker I: Von Fabius Pictor bis Cn. Gellius, with tr. and commentary. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Beck, H. and Walter, U. (2004) Die frühen römischen Historiker II: Von Coelius Antipater bis Pomponius Atticus, with tr. and commentary. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Begemann, E. (2012) Schicksal als Argument: Ciceros Rede vom fatum in der späten Republik. Potsdamer altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge 37. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Belardi, W. and Cipriano, P. (1990) Casus interrogandi. Nigidio Figulo e la teoria stoica della lingua. Rome.Google Scholar
Bell, B. M. (1995) “The contribution of Julius Caesar to the vocabulary of ethnography,” Latomus 54: 753–67.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. (2012) “Catullo e la politica romana,” in Letteratura e civitas, ed. Citroni, M.. Pisa: 47–71.Google Scholar
Bellen, H. (1985) Metus Gallicus – Metus Punicus. Zum Furchtmotiv in der römischen Republik. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Cives epicurei: les épicuriens et l’idée de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave. Brussels.Google Scholar
Bérard, F. (1993) “Les commentaires de César: autobiographie, mémoires ou histoire?” in L’Invention de l’autobiographie d’Hésiode à Saint Augustin, eds. Baslez, M.-F., Hoffman, P., et al. Paris: 85–95.Google Scholar
Berry, D. and Erskine, A. (eds.) (2010) Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berthold, H. (1966) “Der jüngere Cato bei den Kirchenvätern,” in Studia patristica. Vol. VII–IX, part 3, ed. Cross, F. L.. Berlin: 3–19.Google Scholar
Bexley, E. M. (2009) “Replacing Rome: geographic and political centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia,” CP 104: 459–75.Google Scholar
Bicknell, P. and Nielsen, D. (1998) “Five cohorts against the world,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 138–66.Google Scholar
Biggs, T. (forthcoming) “Achaemenides and the idea of early Latin epic.”Google Scholar
Biskup, T. (2009) “The enlightenment,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Oxford: 399–409.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1998) Against the Grammarians: Translation, Introduction and Commentary. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Blank, D. (2005) “Varro’s anti-analogist,” in Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, eds. Inwood, B. and Frede, D.. Cambridge: 210–38.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (1995) Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (2016) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Raman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. T. (1988) “Caesar’s second consulship and the completion and date of the Bellum Civile,” CJ 84.1: 31–40.Google Scholar
Bojkowitsch, A. (1924–5) “Hirtius als Offizier und als Stilist,” Wiener Studien 44: 178–88.Google Scholar
Bojkowitsch, A. (1926–7) “Hirtius als Offizier und als Stilist,” Wiener Studien 45: 71–81, 221–32.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. (1953) “Der commentarius: zur Vorgeschichte und literarischen Form der Schriften Caesars.” Hermes 81: 210–50.Google Scholar
Bossuat, R. (1943) “Traductions françaises des Commentaires de César à la fin du XVe siècle,” Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance, 3: 253–411.Google Scholar
Botermann, H. (2002) “Gallia pacata – perpetua pax. Die Eroberung Galliens und der ‘gerechte Krieg’,” in Res publica reperta. Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats. Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken, ed. Spielvogel, J.. Stuttgart: 279–96; reprinted in Baltrusch (2007): 137–58.Google Scholar
Bourguignon D’Anville, J.-B. (1763) Les Commentaires de César. Nouvelle édition revue, corrigée et augmentée de notes historiques et géographiques et d’une carte nouvelle de la Gaule et du plan d’Alise. Amsterdam and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bowie, A. M. (1990) “The death of Priam: allegory and history in the Aeneid,” CQ 40: 470–81.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. (2001) “Introduction,” in Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford: 137–41.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1982) Horace on Poetry. 3, Epistles Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2013a) “L. Cornelius Sisenna,” in The Fragments of the Roman Historians, ed. Cornell, T.. Vol 1, Oxford: 306–19.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2013b) “C. Sempronius Gracchus,” in The Fragments of the Roman Historians, ed. Cornell, T.. Vol. 1, Oxford: 243.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2004) “‘Virtus consili expers: an interpretation of the centurions’ contest in Caesar, De bello Gallico 5, 44,” Hermes 132: 292–308.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2013) “Caesar’s description of bridging the Rhine (Bellum Gallicum 4.16–19): a literary anylysis,” CP 108: 41–53.Google Scholar
Brown, V. (1976) “Caesar, Gaius Julius,” in Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum, ed. Cranz, F.. Vol. 3, Washington, DC: 87–140.Google Scholar
Brown, V. (1979) “Latin manuscripts of Caesar’s Gallic War,” in Palaeographica Diplomatica et Archivista. Studi in Onore di Giulio Battelli. Rome: 104–57.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. (1975) “Stoicism and the principate,” Papers of the British School at Rome 43: 7–35.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. (1980) “Cicero and historiography,” Philias Charin: Miscellanea di studi classici in onore di Eugenio Manni. Rome: 309–40.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1939) “M. Tullius Cicero – I. Fragmente der Dichtungen C.s,” RE 7.A.1: 1236–67.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. and Cary, M. (eds.) (1927) C. Suetoni Tranquilli Divus Iulius. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cairns, F., and Fantham, E. (eds.) (2003) Caesar against Liberty? Perspectives on His Autocracy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (1986) “Disziplin und Rationalität: Zur Analyse militärischer Intelligenz am Beispiel von Caesars ‘Gallischem Krieg’,” Saeculum 37,2: 166–81.Google Scholar
Candau, J. M. (2011) “Republican Rome: autobiography and political struggles,” in Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion, ed. Marasco, G.. Leiden: 121–59.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R. L. (1981) “Herbert Spencer as an anthropologist,” Journal of Libertarian Studies 5: 153–210.Google Scholar
Castner, C. J. (1991, 2nd edn) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century bc to the Second Century ad. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G. (2004) “When, how and why did Xenophon write the Anabasis?” in The Long March: Xenophon and the Ten Thousand, ed. Lane Fox, R.. New Haven, CT and London: 47–67.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2007) “Alterità linguistica, Latinitas e ideologia tra Lucillio e Cicerone,” in Plurilinguismo letterario, eds. Oniga, R. and Vatteroni, S.. Soveria Mannelli: 41–58.Google Scholar
Champion, C. (2000) “Romans as βάρβαροι: three Polybian speeches and the politics of cultural indeterminacy,” CP 95.4: 425–44.Google Scholar
Chaplin, J. (2013) “Alluding to reality: towards a typology of historiographical intertextuality,” Histos working papers 2013.01 http://research.ncl.ac.uk/histos/documents/2013WP01ChaplinAlludingtoReality.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chassignet, M. (1986) Les Origines (Fragments): texte établi, trad. et comm. par Chassignet M. Paris.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (1996) L’annalistique romaine I: Les Annales des Pontifes. L’annalistique ancienne, with tr. and notes. Paris.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (1999) L’annalistique romaine II: L’annalistique moyenne, with tr. and notes. Paris.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (2003) “La naissance de l’autobiographie à Rome: laus sui ou apologia de uita sua? REL 81: 65–78.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (2004a) L’annalistique romaine III: L’annalistique récente. L’autobiographie politique, with tr. and notes. Paris.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (2004b) “Gaule Cisalpine et Gaule Chevelue, ‘pays de Cocagne’. Le témoignage de l’historiographie romaine de la République”, in Rus amoenum. Les agréments de la vie rurale en Gaule romaine et dans les régions voisines, eds. Bedon, R. and Dupré, N.. Limoges: 217–36.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (2005) “Rhétorique et histoire dans les ‘Origines’ de Caton,” Cahiers des Études Anciennes 42: 195–224.Google Scholar
Chausserie-Laprée, J.-P. (1969) L’expression narrative chez les historiens latins. Paris.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2006) “The concept of the classical and the canons of model authors in Roman literature,” in Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, ed. Porter, J.. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: 204–34.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. (2011a) “Classical Latin,” in A Companion to the Latin Language, ed. Clackson, J.. Oxford: 236–56.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. and Horrocks, G. (2007) The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (2009) “Some Renaissance Caesars,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 356–70.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. (1753) C. Julii Caesaris quae extant accuratissime cum libris editis et MSS optimis collata, recognita et correcta. London.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (2012) “Bureaucratic language in the correspondence between Pliny and Trajan,” TAPA 142: 189–238.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (1952) Propaganda, Ethics, and Psychological Assumptions in Caesar’s Writings. Diss. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (1959) “On the date and interpretation of the Bellum Civile,” AJP 80: 113–32.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (1963) “A selective survey of Caesar scholarship since 1935,” CW 57: 45–51, 81–8.Google Scholar
Contarini, F. (1988) “Commentarii rerum in Hetruria gestarum,” in Per la memorialistica veneziana in latino del Quattrocento: Filippo da Rimini, Francesco Contarini, Coriolano Cippico, ed. Fabbri, R.. Padua: 41–73.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994a) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopaedia. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994b) Latin Literature: A History. Trans. Solodow, J. B.. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996) Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Craig, C. (2004) “Audience expectations, invective, and proof,” in Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J.. Oxford: 187–213.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (1979) Epistolographi Latini minores vol 2. Aetatem ciceronianam et augusteam amplectens. Pars I: Testimonia et fragmenta; Pars 2; Commentarium criticum. Turin.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (1983) Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia latina nella tarda repubblica e nei primi due secoli dell’impero, con cenni sull’epistolografia preciceroniana. Rome.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro Behr, F. (2007) Feeling History: Lucan, Stoicism, and the Poetics of Passion. Columbus.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. (1967) “Clementia Caesaris,” in Caesar, ed. Rasmussen, D.. Darmstadt: 32–47.Google Scholar
Dangel, J. (1995) “Stratégies de parole dans le discours indirect de César (De bello gallico): étude syntaxico-stylistique,” in De usu: études de syntaxe latine offertes en hommage à Marius Lavency, ed. Longrée, D.. Louvain-la-Neuve: 95–113.Google Scholar
Davies, J. P. (2004) Rome’s Religious History. Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on their Gods. Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Blois, L. (2007) “Army and general in the late Roman Republic,” in A Companion to the Roman Army, ed. Erdkamp, P.. Malden, MA: 164–79.Google Scholar
De Jonge, C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics, and Literature. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
De Lorenzi, A. (1948) Dimidiatus Menander alla luce della polemica antiatticista di Cicerone. Naples.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (1975) “Un modulo del linguaggio critico di Cicerone (Brutus, 76),” SIFC 47: 68–85.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1950) “Elegantia Caesaris: Zu Caesars Reden und Commentarii,” Gymnasium 57: 112–23.Google Scholar
Delbrück, H. (1975) History of the Art of War within the Framework of Political History. Vol. 1, Antiquity, trans. Renfroe, W. G.. Westport, CT.Google Scholar
Delrio, M. (1869) Commentarii de tumultu Belgico, trans. Delvigne, A.. Brussels, Ghent, and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Delrio, M. (2003) Die Chronik über Don Juan de Austria, eds. Edelmayer, F. and Bacigalupe, M. Echevarría. Vienna.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (2005) Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) (2000) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dernoscheck, O. (1903) De elegantia Caesaris sive de commentariorum de bello Gallico et de bello civili differentiis animadversione. Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Devillers, O. (2012) “The concentration of power and writing history: forms of historical persuasion in the Histories (1.1–49),” in A Companion to Tacitus, ed. Pagán, V.. Malden, MA: 162–86.Google Scholar
DeWitt, N. (1942) “The non-political nature of Caesar’s commentaries,” TAPA 73: 341–52.Google Scholar
Di Lorenzo, E. (1993) “Il discorso di Critognato (B. G. 7, 77): Struttura narrativa e ideologia,” in La cultura in Cesare, ed. Poli, D.. Rome: 553–75.Google Scholar
Díaz del Castillo, B. (2005) Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España, ed. Rodríguez, J. A. Barbón. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Dietler, M. (1998) “A tale of three sites: the monumentalization of Celtic oppida and the politics of collective memory and identity,” World Archaeology 30: 72–89.Google Scholar
Dobbin, R. F. (1995) “Julius Caesar in Jupiter’s prophecy, Aeneid, Book 1,” CA 14: 5–40.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. (1994, 2nd edn) The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Bristol.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Durand, J.-L. and Scheid, J. (1994) “‘Rites’ et ‘religion’: Remarques sur certains préjugés des historiens de la religion des grecs et des romains,” Archive de Sciences sociales des Religions 85: 23–43.Google Scholar
Ebbeler, J. (2003) “Caesar’s letters and the ideology of literary history,” Helios 30: 3–20.Google Scholar
Edelmayer, F. and Bacigalupe, M. Á. Echevarría (2003) Martin Antonio Del Rio. Die Chronik ueber Don Juan de Austria/La cronica sobre don Juan de Austria. Munich.Google Scholar
Eden, P. T. (1962) ‘Caesar’s style: inheritance versus intelligence,’ Glotta 40: 74–117.Google Scholar
Enríquez de Guzmán, A. (1970) The Life and Acts of Don Alonzo Enriquez de Gusmán, ed. Markham, C. R.. New York.Google Scholar
Erickson, B. (2002) “Falling masts, rising masters: the ethnography of virtue in Caesar’s account of the Veneti.” AJP 123: 601–22.Google Scholar
Erickson, P. A. and Murphy, L. D. (2008) A History of Anthropological Theory. Toronto.Google Scholar
Fabia, P. (1889) De orationibus in commentariis Caesaris de bello Gallico. Diss. Paris.Google Scholar
Fabre, P. (1936, 8th edn) César. La guerre civile, with tr. (2 vols.). Paris. revised by A. Balland 1997.Google Scholar
Facio, B. (2004) Rerum gestarum Alfonsi regis libri. Testo latino, traduzione italiana, commento e introduzione, ed. Pietragalla, D.. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1984) “Roman experience of Menander in the late Republic and early Empire,” TAPA 114: 299–309.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2009) “Caesar as an intellectual,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 141–56.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. (eds.) (2013) Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fears, J. R. (1981) “The cult of virtues and Roman imperial ideology,” ANRW 2.17.2: 827–948.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley, CA and London.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. and Probert, P. (2010) “Roman authors on colloquial language,” in Colloquial and Literary Latin, eds. Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A.. Cambridge: 12–41.Google Scholar
Filelfo, F. (1901) “Commentarii de vita et rebus gestis Frederici comitis Urbinatis (ligae) Italicae Imperatoris,” in Atti e memorie della R. Deputazione di Storia Patria per le Province delle Marche, ed. Zannoni, G.. vol. 5 Ancona: 262–393.Google Scholar
Fischer, E. (1880) Das achte Buch vom Gallischen Kriege und das Bellum Alexandrinum: Eine Studie. Passau.Google Scholar
Flobert, P. (1994) “Lingua Latina et Lingua Romana: purisme, administration et invasions barbares,” in Grammaire et rhétorique: notion de romanité, ed. Dangel, J.. Strasbourg: 69–76.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2006) The Art of Forgetting. Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
France, J. (1989) “Espace géographique, méthode historique et textes anciens. L’exemple du Bellum Gallicum de César,” QS 30: 89–118.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1933, reprint 1967) “Über philologische Interpretation am Beispiel von Caesars Gallischem Krieg,“ NJbb 9:26–41.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. (2012) Madness Triumphant: A Reading of Lucan’s Pharsalia. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Frese, R. (1900) Beiträge zur Beurteilung der Sprache Caesars mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des bellum civile. Diss. Munich.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, F. (1887) “Realistisches und Stilistisches zu Cäsar und dessen Fortsetzern,” in Festschrift des Philologischen Kränzchens in Zürich zu der in Zürich im Herbst 1887 tagenden XXXIX. Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner. Zurich: 1–55.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V., Gotteland, S., and Payen, P., (2010) Ombres de Thucydide: la réception de l’historien depuis l’Antiquité jusqu’au début du XXe siècle. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Fucecchi, M. (2011) “Partisans in civil war,” in Brill’s Companion to Lucan, ed. Asso, P.. Leiden: 237–56.Google Scholar
Fustel de Coulanges, D. N. (1891) Histoire des Institutions Politiques de l’Ancienne France. Vol 1, La Gaule Romaine. Paris.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (2013) “Virgil’s Caesar: intertextuality and ideology,” in Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic, eds. Farrell, J. and Nelis, D.. Oxford: 278–96.Google Scholar
Garbarino, G. (1978) “Verba poetica in prosa nella teoria retorica da Cicerone a Quintiliano,” Memorie dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 5/2: 141–235.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. and Lomanto, V. (2011) “Entre conventionnalisme et naturalisme: le problème du nombre chez César et chez Varron,” in Ancient Grammar and Its Posterior Tradition, eds. Kazansky, N. et al. Leuven: 145–61.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. A. (1975) Beobachtungen zu Bauelementen in der antiken Historiographie, besonders bei Livius und Caesar. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. (2010) “The style of the Bellum Hispaniense and the evolution of Roman historiography,” in Colloquial and Literary Latin, eds. Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A.. Cambridge: 243–54.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. and Hausburg, B. (2013) Caesar and the Bellum Alexandrinum: An Analysis of Style, Narrative Technique, and the Reception of Greek Historiography, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1961) “Caesar als Historiker,” in Kleine Schriften 2: 307–35; reprinted in D. Rasmussen (1974), Caesar. Wege der Forschung, Darmstadt: 438–73.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1968) Caesar, Politician and Statesman. Trans. Needham, P.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. and Silk, M. S. (2009) Standard Languages and Language Standards: Greek, Past and Present. Farnham.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Y. (1991) “Orgétorix l’Helvète et le Bellum Gallicum de César,” LEC 59: 267–74.Google Scholar
Giannini, S. (1989) “Ratio e natura nei grammatici latini: Indizi per la ricostruzione dei criteri di analisi fonologica e morfologica,” Studi e saggi linguistici 29: 107–49.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. (1999) “Ovid on reading: reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia II,” JRS 89: 19–37.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (2012) Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger. An Introduction. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goar, R. (1987) The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century bc to the Fifth Century ad. Collection Latomus 197. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, A. (1998) “‘Instinctive genius.’ The depiction of Caesar as a general in the Commentarii,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. London and Swansea: 193–219.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1976) “Die Veränderung des Erzählerstandspunktes in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum,” Poetica 8: 95–119.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1977) “Ein Darstellungsprinzip Caesars. Zur Technik der Peripetie und ihrer Vorbereitung im Bellum Gallicum,” Hermes 105: 307–31.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1984) “Towards a practical criticism of Caesar’s prose style,” ICS 9: 1–18.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1993) Cicero’s Caesarian Speeches. A Stylistic Commentary. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2003) “Clementia after Caesar: from politics to philosophy,” in Caesar against Liberty? eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, E.. Cambridge: 157–82.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2011) “Scribam ipse de me: The personality of the narrator in Caesar’s Bellum Civile,” AJP 132: 243–71.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2012) The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2016) “Caesarian intertextualities: Cotta and Sabinus in BG 5.26–37,” CJ 111.3: 257–79.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (2010) “La nouvelle Rome de César: réalité et utopie,” in Cesare: precursore o visionario? ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 265–84.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. (1971) “Some criminal trials of the late Republic: political and prosopographical problems,” Athenaeum 49: 54–69.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. (2009) “Caesar as a politician,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 23–36.Google Scholar
Guillaumin, Y. (2009) César, in Ecrire l’histoire à Rome, ed. Ratti, St.. Paris: 9–65.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (2010) “Heroic epitaphs of the classical age: the Aristotelian Peplos and beyond,” in Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram, eds. Baumbach, M., Petrović, A., and Petrović, I.. Cambridge: 219–49.Google Scholar
Haffter, H. (1957) “Dem schwanken Zünglein lauschend wachte Cäsar dort,” Museum Helveticum 14: 118–26.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1989) Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, L. (1998) “Ratio and Romanitas in the Bellum Gallicum,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. London and Swansea: 11–43.Google Scholar
Hamblenne, P. (1973) “L’opinion romaine en 46–43 et les sentences ‘politiques’ de Publilius Syrus,” ANRW I.3, 631–702.Google Scholar
Harari, Y. (2004) Renaissance Military Memoirs: War, History and Identity, 1450–1600. Woodbridge.Google Scholar
Harari, Y. (2005) “Martial illusions: war and disillusionment in twentieth-century and Renaissance military memoirs,” The Journal of Military History, 69, 1: 43–72.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2013) “Trojan palimpsests: the archaeology of Roman history in Aeneid 2,” in Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic, eds. Farrell, J. and Nelis, D.. Oxford: 107–23.Google Scholar
Harmand, J. (1973) “Une composante scientifique du Corpus Caesarianum, le portrait de la Gaule dans le De Bello Gallico I–VII,” ANRW I.3: 523–95.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (1991) Vergil, Aeneid 10. With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2013) “Introduction,” in Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature, eds. Paphangelis, T., Harrison, S., and Frangoulidis, S.. Berlin: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hartel, W. von (1891) “Die Cäsarausgabe des Hirtius,” in Commentationes Woelfflinianae. Leipzig: 113–23.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus. The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Hauser, C. (1883) C. Iulii Caesaris Commentariorum de bello Gallico et de bello ciuili textus, qui uocatur, cum praeceptis grammaticis ab eodem scriptore in libris De analogia traditis comparatio. Villach.Google Scholar
Heidtmann, G. (1867) Haben wir ausreichende Garantien für die Aechtheit der dem C. Julius Cäsar zugeschriebenen Bücher De Bello Civili? Essen.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, J. (1999) “Zur Verwicklung ubischer Gruppen in den Ambiorix-Aufstand d. J. 54 v. Chr.: eburonische und ubische Münzen im Hortfund Fraire-2,” ZPE 127: 275–93.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1993 [19283]) Virgil’s Epic Technique. Trans. by H. and Harvey, D. and Robertson, F.. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Heldmann, K. (2011) Sine Ira et Studio: Das Subjektivitätsprinzip der römischen Geschichtsschreibung und das Selbstverständnis antiker Historiker. Munich.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. (1963) Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la république. Paris.Google Scholar
Hemmerle, O. (2006) “Crossing the Rubicon into Paris,” in Julius Caesar in Western Culture, ed. Wyke, M.. Malden, MA: 285–302.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1998) Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2007) “‘…when who should walk into the room but…’: Epistoliterarity in Cicero Ad Qfr. 3.1,” in Ancient Letters, eds. Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D.. Oxford: 37–85.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2014) “Was Suetonius’ Julius a Caesar?” in Suetonius the Biographer, eds. Power, T. and Gibson, R.. Oxford: 81–110.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (forthcoming) “Cicero’s letters to Cicero, Ad Qfr: big brothers keepers.”Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1906) “The De Analogia of Julius Caesar: its occasion, nature, and date, with additional fragments,” CP 1: 97–120.Google Scholar
Heraeus, W. (1902) “Die römische Soldatensprache,” Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik 12: 255–80.Google Scholar
Hering, W. (1987) C. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii rerum gestarum. Vol. I: Bellum Gallicum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Herrmann, L. (1930–2) “César ou Cicéron?” Bulletin Bibliographique et Pédagogique du Musée Belge 34: 243–5.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J.-B. and Szantyr, A. (1965) Lateinische Grammatik. Vol. II: Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2003, 2nd edn) Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and his Achievement. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996) “Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität,” in Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt. Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewusstsein, eds. Gehrke, H.-J. and Möller, A.. Tübingen: 301–33.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.- J. (2001) “Capitol, Comitium und Forum. Öffentliche Räume, sakrale Topographie und Erinnerungslandschaften der römischen Republik,” in Studien zu antiken Identitäten, ed. Faller, S.. Würzburg: 97–132.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2010) Reconstructing the Roman Republic. An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K. J. (2013) “Friends, Romans, countrymen: addressing the Roman people and the rhetoric of inclusion,” in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 11–28.Google Scholar
Holleman, A. W. (1978) “Cicero’s reaction to the Julian calendar,” Historia 27: 496–8.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. J. (1997) “Roman triumphal painting: its function, development, and reception,” Art Bulletin 79: 130–47.Google Scholar
Holtz, L. (1913) Julius Caesar quo usus sit in orationibus dicendi genere. Diss. Jena.Google Scholar
Hooff, A. J. L. van (1974) “Karakter van de liber de bello Hispaniensi,” Klio 4: 138–53.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1994) “Narratology and narrative technique in Thucydides,” in Greek Historiography, ed. Hornblower, S.. Oxford: 131–66.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. (2010, 2nd edn) Greek: A History of the Language and Its Speakers. Chichester and Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1985) “Illusion and reality in Latin topographical writing,” G&R 32: 197–208.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. (1902) “Studies in the vocabulary of Caesar’s Gallic War,” Teachers College Record 3: 133–67.Google Scholar
Huber, P. (1913) Die Glaubwürdigkeit Cäsars in seinem Bericht über den Gallischen Krieg. Bamberg.Google Scholar
Hyart, C. (1954) Les origines du style indirect latin et son emploi jusqu’à l’époque de César. Brussels.Google Scholar
Ianziti, G. (1988) Humanistic Historiography under the Sforzas: Politics and Propaganda in Fifteenth-Century Milan. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ianziti, G. (1992) “I Commentarii: appunti per la storia di un genere storiografico quattrocentesco,” Archivio Storico Italiano 150, 4: 1029–63.Google Scholar
Ihm, G. (1893) “Die stilistische Eigenart des 7. Buches von Caesars Bellum Gallicum,” Philol. Suppl. 6: 767–77.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Felix (1909). “Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Historiographie und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente,” Klio 9: 80–123.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. (2010) “Once more to Syracuse: Livy’s perspective on the Verrines,” in Livy and Intertextuality, ed. Polleichtner, W.. Trier: 15–46.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (2002) “A propos des lettres à Cicéron (année 49): quelques remarques,” in Epistulae Antiquae II: Actes du IIe Colloque International “Le Genre Epistolaire antique et ses Prolongements Européens,” eds. Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E., Louvain and Paris: 51–9.Google Scholar
James, B. (2000) “Speech, authority, and experience in Caesar, Bellum Gallicum 1. 39–41,” Hermes 128.1: 54–64.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2000) “Caesar und die Krise von 47 v. Chr.,” in L’Ultimo Cesare, ed. Urso, G.. Rome: 151–73.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2005) “History’s alternative Caesars: Julius Caesar and current historiography,” in Julius Caesar: New Critical Essays, ed. Zander, H.. New York and London: 59–70.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2010) “Erfahrungsraum und Erwartungshorizont bei Julius Caesar,” in Cesare: precursore o visionario? ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 311–32.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2017) “Caesar the Politician,” in The Landmark Caesar, ed. Raaflaub, K.. New York.Google Scholar
Jenkins, A. (1806) The History and Description of the City of Exeter and its Environs. Exeter.Google Scholar
Jervis, A. (2001) Gallia Scripta: Images of Gauls and Romans in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum. Diss. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (ed.) (1967) The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Joseph, T. A. (2012) “Tacitus and epic,” in A Companion to Tacitus, ed. Pagán, V.. Malden, MA: 369–85.Google Scholar
Jullian, C. (1920, 2nd edn) Histoire de la Gaule. Vol. 2, La conquête romaine et les premières invasions germaniques. Paris.Google Scholar
Keith, A. (1999) “Slender verse: Roman elegy and ancient rhetorical theory,” Mnemosyne 52: 41–62.Google Scholar
Kellner, H. (1987) “Narrativity in history: post-structuralism and since,” History and Theory 26: 1–29.Google Scholar
Kelsey, F. W. (1905) “The title of Caesar’s work on the Gallic and civil wars.” TAPA 36: 211–38.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1978) “Ciceros Cato: Überlegungen zu einer verlorenen Schrift Ciceros,” RhM 121: 167–84.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio Funebris. Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W (2003) Römische Geschichtsschreibung der republikanischen Zeit. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. (1910) Cäsarstudien: nebst einer Analyse der Strabonischen Beschreibung von Gallien und Britannien. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. (1927a) C. Iuli Caesaris Commentarii. Vol. III: Commentarii Belli Alexandrini, Belli Africi, Belli Hispaniensis. Accedunt C. Iuli Caesaris et A. Hirtii fragmenta. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. and Trillitzsch, W. (1957) C. Iuli Caesaris Commentarii. Vol. 1: Commentarii belli Gallici. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Knecht, R. (1989) “Military autobiographies in sixteenth-century France,” in War, Literature and the Arts in Sixteenth-century Europe, eds. Mulryne, J. R. and Shewing, M.. Southampton: 3–21.Google Scholar
Koestermann, E. (1973) “L. Munatius Plancus und das Bellum Africanum,” Historia 22: 48–63.Google Scholar
Kohl, J. (1924) “Der Verfasser des Kriegstagebuchs vom Bellum Hispaniense,” Bayerische Blätter für das Gymnasialschulwesen: 60: 38–42.Google Scholar
Köhler, A. (1877) De auctorum Belli Africani et Belli Hispaniensi Latinitate. Erlangen.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. (2003) “Wege der Übermittlung politischer Inhalte im Alltag Roms,” in Propaganda – Selbstdarstellung – Repräsentation im römischen Kaiserreich des 1. Jhs. n. Chr., eds. Weber, G. and Zimmermann, M.. Stuttgart: 127–43.Google Scholar
Kollmann, E. D. (1977) “Die Macht des Namens. Beobachtungen zum ‘unpersönlichen’ Stil Caesars,” StudClas 17: 45–60.Google Scholar
Kornemann, E. (1896) “Die historische Schriftstellerei des C. Asinius Pollio: zugleich ein Beitrag zur Quellenforschung über Appian und Plutarch,” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie suppl. 22: 557–691.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (1980) Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (2005) “Oregetorix,” in Corona coronaria: Festschrift für Hans-Otto Kröner zum 75. Geburtstag, eds. Harwardt, S. and Schwind, J.. Hildesheim: 225–39.Google Scholar
Kraner, F., Dittenberger, W., and Meusel, H. (1961, 20th edn) C. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii De Bello Gallico. Zurich.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (ed.) (1999) The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Mnemosyne Supp. 191. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (2005a) “Hair, hegemony, and historiography: Caesar’s style and its earliest critics,” in Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, eds. Adams, J., Lapidge, M., and Reinhardt, T.. Oxford: 97–115.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (2005b) “Historiography and biography,” in A Companion to Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S.. Malden, MA: 241–56.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (2009) “Bellum Gallicum,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 159–74.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (2010) “Speech and silence in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum,” in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 247–63.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (2011) “The language of Latin historiography,” in A Companion to the Latin Language, ed. Clackson, J.. Malden, MA: 408–25.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (2013) “Is historia a genre? (with notes on Caesar’s first landing in Britain, BG 4.24–5),” in Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature, eds. Papanghelis, T., Harrison, S., and Frangoulidis, S.. Berlin: 417–32.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2005) Negotiatio Germaniae: Tacitus’ Germania und Enea Silvio Piccolomini, Giannantonio Campano, Conrad Celtis und Heinrich Bebel. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2006) “‘Imaginary geography’ in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum,” AJP 127: 111–36.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2008) “Magni Viri: Caesar, Alexander and Pompey in Cat. 11,” Philologus 152: 223–9.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2009) “A seemingly artless conversation: Cicero’s De Legibus (1.1–5),” CP 104: 90–106.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2011) “Borealism: Caesar, Seneca, Tacitus, and the Roman discourse about the Germanic North,” in Cultural Identity and the Peoples of the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Gruen, E.. Los Angeles, CA: 202–21.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2012) “Annum quiete et otio transiit. Tacitus (Ag. 6.3) and Sallust on liberty, tyranny, and human dignity,” in A Companion to Tacitus, ed. Pagán, V.. Malden, MA: 331–44.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2013a) “Caesar, Lucretius and the dates of De Rerum Natura and the Commentarii,” CQ 63: 772–9.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2013b) “Julius Caesar,” in The Virgil Encyclopedia, eds. Thomas, R. and Ziolkowski, J.. Malden, MA: 694–5.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2015) “The buried tradition of programmatic titulature among Republican historians: Polybius’ Πραγματεία, Asellio’s Res Gestae, and Sisenna’s redefinition of ‘Historiae’,” AJP 136.3: 503–24.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2016) “Thucydides in Gaul and signposting in the Gallic War. The sieges of Plataea and Avaricum,” Histos 10: 1-11.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2017) “Caesar the historian,” in The Landmark Caesar, ed. Raaflaub, K.. New York.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (forthcoming a) “A neglected aspect of Elegantia Caesaris. Loans, technical terms, and rare words (including neologisms).”Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (forthcoming b) The Mind of the Commander. Julius Caesar, Man of Letters. New York.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (forthcoming c) Commentary on De Bello Gallico Book 7.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1933) “Die Entwicklung der lateinischen Literatursprache,” Glotta 22: 1–27.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2001) Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Holzweissig, Fr. (1912) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Elementar-, Formen- und Wortlehre. Hanover.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1955) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre. Hannover.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, K. (1970) “Cicero’s Cato,” in Forschungen zur römischen Literatur. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner, ed. Wimmel, W.. Wiesbaden: 168–88.Google Scholar
Lambert, A. (1946) Die indirekte Rede als künstlerisches Stilmittel des Livius. Zurich.Google Scholar
Lamoine, L. (2006) “La pratique du vergobret: le témoignage de César confronté aux inscriptions,” CCG 17: 81–104.Google Scholar
Landgraf, G. (1888) Untersuchungen zu Caesar und seinen Fortsetzern: insbesondere über Autorschaft und Komposition des Bellum Alexandrinum und Africanum. Erlangen.Google Scholar
Landi, A. (1999) “Saggio sulla varietà diamesica del Bellum Africum,” Hermes 127: 303–316 (previously published in Militerni Della Morte 1996: 87–105).Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. (2004) “Sex, gender and the other in Xenophon’s Anabasis,” in The Long March: Xenophon and the Ten Thousand, ed. Fox, R. Lane. New Haven, CT: 184–214.Google Scholar
Langhammer, A. (1908) “Zum Bellum Africanum,” Philologische Wochenschrift 28: 1548–52.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. (1978) “Zu Cäsars Erzählstrategie (BG I 1–29: Der Helvetierfeldzug),” AU 21: 70–87.Google Scholar
Laurand, L. (1936, 4th edn) Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron: avec une esquisse de l’histoire du cursus. Paris.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1955) “Le genre et le style historique à Rome: théorie et pratique,” REL 33: 183–208.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians and Philosophers. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (2001) “Julius Caesar, the orator of paradox,” in The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome, ed. Wooten, C.. Leiden: 97–110.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Rabbie, E. (eds.) (1989) M. Tullius Cicero, De Oratore Libri III. Kommentar 3: II, 99-290. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Wisse, J., (eds.) (1996) M. Tullius Cicero, De Oratore libri III Vol. IV. Buch II, 291–367; Buch III, 1–95. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2009) “Neronian literature: Seneca and Lucan,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 239–51.Google Scholar
Lendon, E. (1999) “The rhetoric of combat: Greek military theory and Roman culture in Julius Caesar’s battle descriptions,” CA 18: 273–329.Google Scholar
Lendon, E. (2009) “Historians without history: against Roman historiography,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, ed. Feldherr, A.. Cambridge: 41–62Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1914) “Die römische Poesie in der sullanischen Zeit,” Hermes 49: 161–95 = F. Leo (1960) Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, ed. by E. Fraenkel. Rome: 249–82.Google Scholar
Leone, M. (1976) “Il problema del flaminato di Cesare,” in Studi di storia antica offerti dagli allievi a Eugenio Manni. Rome: 193–212.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (1998) Caesars Politik in Gallien. Interpretationen zum Bellum Gallicum. Bochum.Google Scholar
Linde, P. (1923) “Die Stellung des Verbs in der lateinischen Prosa,” Glotta 12: 153–78.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1984a) “Rome, Aphrodisias and the Res Gestae: the genera militiae and the status of Octavian,” JRS 74: 74–80.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1984b) “Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum: concepts of defensive imperialism,” in The Imperialism of Mid-Republican Rome, ed. Harris, W. V.. Rome: 133–64; reprinted in Linderski (1995) Roman Questions I. Stuttgart: 1–31.Google Scholar
Liou-Gille, B. (1999) “César, Flamen Dialis destinatus,” Revue des Études Anciennes 101: 433–59.Google Scholar
Little, W. (1902) “Studies in the syntax of Caesar’s Gallic War,” Teachers College Record 3: 168–237.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, E. (1911) Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der lateinischen Sprache. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Loicq, J. (2007) “D’où César tenait-il sa doctrine du Rhin, frontière gallo-germanique?” REL 85: 66–80.Google Scholar
Lomanto, V. (1994–5) “Cesare e la teoria dell’eloquenza,” Memorie dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 18–19: 3–127.Google Scholar
Lomanto, V. (2002) “Il canone di Volcacio e gli esordi della letteratura latina,” Lexis 57: 216–51.Google Scholar
Lossmann, F. (1957) “Zur literarischen Kritik Suetons in den Kapiteln 55 und 56 der Caesarvita,” Hermes 85: 47–58.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2008) “Cicero on Caesar or exemplum and inability in the Brutus,” in Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit/Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond, eds. Arweiler, A. and Möller, M.. Berlin: 131–54.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1965) “Design and structure in Livy: 5.32–55,” TAPA 102: 265–302; reprinted in J. Chaplin and C. Kraus (2009) Livy. Oxford: 148–87.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1989) “Review of Woodman, Rhetoric in Classical Historiography (1988),” Phoenix 43: 174–7.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1991) “Livy, Augustus, and the Forum Augustum,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley, CA: 123–38.Google Scholar
Lupher, D. (2003) Romans in a New World: Classical Models in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Madden, R. (2010) Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. London.Google Scholar
Madvig, I. (1873) Adversaria critica ad scriptores Graecos et Latinos. Vol. II: Emendationes Latinae. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Maier, U. (1978) Caesars Feldzüge in Gallien (58–51 v. Chr.) in ihrem Zusammenhang mit der stadtrömischen Politik. Bonn.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. (1976, 4th edn) Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae. Turin.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. (ed.) (1969, 5th edn) Imperatoris Caesaris Augusti operum fragmenta. Turin.Google Scholar
Malitz, J. (1987a) “Die Kalenderreform Caesars: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte seiner Spätzeit,” Ancient Society 18: 103–31.Google Scholar
Malitz, J. (1987b) “Die Kanzlei Caesars – Herrschaftsorganisation zwischen Republik und Prinzipat,” Historia 36: 51–72.Google Scholar
Manelmi, E. (1728) Commentariolum de quibusdam gestis in bello Gallico seu De obsidione Brixiae, ed. Astezatus, J.-A.. Brescia.Google Scholar
Mannsperger, B. (1974) “Libertas – Honos – Felicitas: Zur Prägung des Münzmeisters Palikanus,” Chiron 4: 327–42.Google Scholar
Mantovanelli, P. (2000) “Cesare e la Fortuna,” in L’Ultimo Cesare, ed. Urso, G.. Rome: 211–30.Google Scholar
Marciniak, K. (2008) “Cicero und Caesar. Ein Dialog der Dichter,” Philologus 152: 212–22.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1999) “Genre, convention and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography,” in The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts, ed. Kraus, C.. Leiden: 281–324.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2005) “Marcellus at Syracuse (Livy XXV, 24,11–15). A historian reflects,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XII, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 219–29.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. (1999) “Caesar’s early career. The emphasis on his Marian connections and the decision to turn popularis,” AH 29: 68–79.Google Scholar
Maurach, G. (2002) “Caesar’s humor,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 26: 53–60.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, R. (2013) An Archaeology of Cicero’s Letters: A Study of Late Republican Textual Culture. Diss. Toronto.Google Scholar
McDougall, I. (1991) “Dio and his sources for Caesar’s campaigns in Gaul,” Latomus 50: 616–38.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, K. (2009) “War and words,” in The Cambridge Companion to War Writing, ed. McLoughlin, K.. Cambridge: 15–24.Google Scholar
Mehl, A. (2001) Römische Geschichtsschreibung. Grundlagen und Entwicklungen. Eine Einführung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mehl, A. (2013) “How the Romans remembered, recorded, thought about, and used their past,” in Thinking, Recording, and Writing History in the Ancient World, ed. Raaflaub, K.. Malden, MA: 256–75.Google Scholar
Meiser, G. (1998) Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Melchior, A. (2008–9) “What would Pompey do? Exempla and Pompeian failure in the Bellum Africum,” CJ 104: 241–57.Google Scholar
Mendoça, B. de (1592) Comentarios de lo sucedido en las Guerras de los Payses baxos. Madrid.Google Scholar
Mendoza, B. de (2008) Comentarios de lo sucedido en las Guerras de los Países Bajos. Introducción de Antonio Cortijo Ocaña y Ángel Gómez Moreno (“Propaganda, contrapropaganda y leyenda negra”). Madrid.Google Scholar
Meusel, H. (1927) “Cäsar: Beiträge zur Kritik des Bellum Gallicum II,” Jahresberichte des philologischen Vereins zu Berlin 20: 214–398.Google Scholar
Milanese, G. (1989) Lucida carmina: Comunicazione e scrittura da Epicuro a Lucrezio. Milan.Google Scholar
Militerni Della Morte, P. (1993) “Alcune osservazioni sull’uso del diminutivo nel Bellum Africum,” BStudLat 23: 20–33.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (2012) Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (1997) La raison de Rome: naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République (IIe–Ier siècle avant Jésus-Christ). Paris.Google Scholar
Moiret, J.-M. (2001) Memoirs of Napoleon’s Egyptian Expedition, ed. and trans. Brindle, R.. London.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1994) “Introduction to R. Syme, The Roman Revolution” translated and reprinted in Momigliano, A. D.: Studies on Modern Scholarship, eds. Bowersock, G. and Cornell, T.. Berkeley, CA: 72–8.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1882, 7th edn) Römische Geschichte. Vol. 3, Von Sullas Tode bis zur Schlacht von Thapsus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Monluc, B. de (1964) Commentaires 1521–1576, ed. Courteault, P., pref. Giono, J.. Paris.Google Scholar
Morawiecki, L. (1983) Political Propaganda in the Coinage of the Late Roman Republic (44–43 BC). Warsaw.Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2003) “Place and road. Neglected aspects of Livy IX.1–19,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XI, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 290–306.Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2013) “Writer and addressee in Cicero’s letters,” in The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ed. Steel, C.. Cambridge: 196–214.Google Scholar
Moreno Hernández, A. (ed.) (2010) Julio César: textos, contextos y recepción. De la Roma Clásica al mundo actual. Madrid.Google Scholar
Moreno Hernández, A. (forthcoming) “Julio César y Carlos V: Precisiones sobre la recepción de César en el Comentario de la Guerra de Alemania de Luis de Ávila y Zúñiga,” in Boletín de la Real Academia de la Lengua Española.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1997) “Levi Quidem de re...: Julius Caesar as tyrant and pedant,” JRS 87: 23–40.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2009) “Dignitas and Res publica: Caesar and Republican legitimacy,” in Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Munich: 115–40.Google Scholar
Müller, M. (2001) Das Bellum Africum: ein historisch-philologischer Kommentar der Kapitel 1–47. Trier.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (2007) “Pura oratio and puri sermonis amator: zu zwei Begriffsklippen der Terenz-Forschung,” in Terentius Poeta, eds. Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W.-W., and Felgentreu, F.. Munich: 111–23.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (2013) “Terence in Latin literature from the second century bce to the second century ce,” in A Companion to Terence, eds. Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A.. Malden, MA: 363–79.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F.-H. (1975) Erzählstil und Propaganda in Caesars Kommentarien. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Napoleon, I (2009) Précis des guerres de Jules César: écrit à Sainte-Hélène par Marchand sous la dictée de l’empereur. Bécherel.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (1979) La provvidenza crudele: Lucano e la distruzione dei miti augustei. Pisa.Google Scholar
Nash, D. (1976) “Reconstructing Poseidonios’ Celtic ethnography: some considerations,” Britannia 7: 111–26.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, É. (2005) “Barbarus, une dénomination de l’ennemi étranger chez César,” Scholia 14: 89–108.Google Scholar
Neue, F. and Wagener, C. (1892–1905, 3rd edn) Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache, 4 vols. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nice, A. (2003) “C. Trebatius Testa and the British charioteers: the relationship of Cic. ad Fam. 7.10.2 to Caes. BG 4.25 and 33,” Acta Classica 46: 71–96.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1991) Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (2009) “Caesar and the two Napoleons,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 410–17.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, C. (1847) C. Iulii Caesaris commentarii cum supplementis A. Hirtii et aliorum. Caesaris Hirtiique fragmenta. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nixon, C. and Rodgers, B. (1994) In Praise of Later Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini: Introduction, Translation, and Historical Commentary. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Noonan, J. D. (2003) “Re-valuing values at the end of the Aeneid: dignitas, libertas, and maiestas,” CB 79.1: 33–45.Google Scholar
Norbrook, D. (1999) Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric and Politics, 1627–1660. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1898) Die antike Kunstprosa vom 6. Jahrhundert vor Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance (2 vols.). Leipzig (repr. Darmstadt 1958).Google Scholar
Nousek, D. (2004) Narrative Style and Genre in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum. Diss. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Nutting, H. C. (1929) “The battle at Mons Graupius. Tacitus, Agricola 29–37,” CW 23: 65–6.Google Scholar
Nützel, K. (2004) Geografische Wort- und Sachuntersuchungen zu den Schriften Caesars und zum Corpus Caesarianum im Vergleich zu römischen Autoren vor und nach Caesar. Diss. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. (2009) “Arms and letters: Julius Caesar, the Commentaries of Pope Pius II, and the politicization of papal imagery,” Renaissance Quarterly 62, 4: 1057–97.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. (1993) “No Place Like Rome: Identity and Difference in the Germania of Tacitus,” Ramus 22: 135–54.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Odelman, E. (1972) Études sur quelques reflets du style administratif chez César. Diss. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. and Bloom, G. (1927) “Caesar’s grammatical theories and his own practice,” CJ 22: 584–602.Google Scholar
Opelt, I. (1965) Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen: Eine Typologie. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Oppermann, H. (1961) “Neuere Forschungen zur Glaubwürdigkeit Caesars,” Gymnasium 68: 258–69.Google Scholar
Oppermann, H. (1974) “Probleme und heutiger Stand der Caesarforschung,” in Caesar. Wege der Forschung, ed. Rasmussen, D.. Darmstadt (2nd edn): 485–522.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2009) ‘The pen and the sword. Writing and conquest in Caesar’s Gaul,” CA 28: 328–58.Google Scholar
Oudendorp, F. van (1737) C. Julii Caesaris de Bellis Gallico et Civili Pompejano nec non A. Hirtii, Aliorumque de Bellis Alexandrino, Africano, et Hispaniensi commentarii (2 vols.). Leiden and Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Pallavisini, A. (1972) “Tradizione e novità nel giudizio di Cesare sui barbari nel De bello Gallico,” Contributi dell’Istituto di storia antica 1: 98–107.Google Scholar
Paltroni, P. (1966) Commentari della vita et gesti dell’illustrissimo Federico Duca d’Urbino, ed. Tommasoli, W.. Urbino.Google Scholar
Pandoni, de’, P. (1731 and 1751) Commentaria comitis Jacobi Picinini and Commentariorum secundi anni de gestis Scipionis Picinini, Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, 1st edn vols. xx and xxv, cols. 64–154 and 3–66, ed. Muratori, L.. Milan.Google Scholar
Pascucci, G. (1965) Bellum Hispaniense: Introduzione, testo critico e commento. Florence.Google Scholar
Pascucci, G. (1973) “Interpretazione linguistica e stilistica del Cesare autentico,” ANRW I.3: 488–522.Google Scholar
Patzer, A. (1993) “Aulus Hirtius als Redaktor des Corpus Caesarianum: Eine grammatisch-historische Analyse der epistula ad Balbum,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 111–30.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (1981) “Caesar’s battle-descriptions and the defeat of Ariovistus,” Latomus 40: 741–66.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2006a) “Judging Julius Caesar,” in Julius Caesar in Western Culture, ed. Wyke, M.. Malden, MA: 3–26.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2006b) “Speech and narrative in the Histories,” in The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, eds. Dewald, C. and Marincola, J.. Cambridge: 103–21.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2007) “Aristagoras: 5.49–55, 97,” in Reading Herodotus: A Study of the Logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories, eds. Irwin, E. and Greenwood, E.. Cambridge: 179–201.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2009a) “The first biographers: Plutarch and Suetonius,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 252–66.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2009b) “Was there an ancient genre of ‘autobiography’? Or, did Augustus know what he was doing?” in The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography, eds. Smith, C. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 41–64.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2011) Plutarch Caesar. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2013) “Xenophon’s and Caesar’s Third-person Narratives – or Are They?” in The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, eds. Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J.. Oxford: 39–75.Google Scholar
Peter, H. (1897) “Die Litteratur der Witzworte in Rom und die geflügelten Worte im Munde Caesars,” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Paedagogik 155: 853–60.Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. (2004) “Standardisierung und Destandardisierung der lateinischen Sprache in diachroner Sicht,” in Studia Humanitatis ac Litterarum Trifolio Heidelbergensi dedicata, eds. Hornung, A., Jäkel, C., and Schubert, W.. Frankfurt: 232–54.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B. (forthcoming) Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World.Google Scholar
Pitcher, L. (2009) “The Roman historians after Livy,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 267–76.Google Scholar
Pius II Piccolomini, A. (2003–7) Commentaries, 2 vols., eds. Meserve, M. and Simonetta, M.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pizzani, U. (1993) “La cultura filosofica di Cesare,” in La cultura in Cesare, ed. Poli, D.. Rome: 163–89.Google Scholar
Plass, P. (1988) Wit and the Writing of History: The Rhetoric of Historiography. Madison.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. (1993) “Teorie grammaticali e prassi della Latinitas in Cesare,” in La cultura in Cesare, ed. Poli, D.. Rome: 599–641.Google Scholar
Poignault, M. R. (1985) “Napoléon Ier et Napoléon III, lecteurs de Jules César,” in Présence de César: homage au doyen M. Rambaud, ed. Chevallier, R.. Paris: 329–45.Google Scholar
Poli, D. (ed.) (1993) La cultura in Cesare: atti del convegno internazionale di studi Macerata-Matelica, 30 aprile-4 maggio 1990. Rome.Google Scholar
Polverini, L. (1993) “Cesare e il nome dei Germani,” in La cultura in Cesare, ed. Poli, D.. Rome: 105–23.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, A. (2003) “Center and periphery in Tacitus’s Histories,” Arethusa 36: 361–74.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, A. (2012) “Tacitus and Roman historiography,” in A Companion to Tacitus, ed. Pagán, V.. Malden, MA: 141–61.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1983) Literatur und geschichtliche Wirklichkeit. Abhandlungen und Aufsätze zur Römischen Prosa und zur Klassischen Philologie. Kleine Schriften, II. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1985) “César en Allemagne de Mommsen à Christian Meier,” in Présence de César, ed. Chevallier, R.. Paris: 407–12.Google Scholar
Pötter, H. (1932) Untersuchungen zum Bellum Alexandrinum und Bellum Africanum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Powell, A. (1998) “Julius Caesar and the presentation of massacre,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. London and Swansea: 111–37.Google Scholar
Powell, A. and Welch, K. (eds.) (1998) Julius Caesar As Artful Reporter. The War Commentaries as Political Instruments. London and Swansea.Google Scholar
Preiswerk, R. (1945) “Sententiae in Cäsars Commentarien,” Museum Helveticum 4: 213–26.Google Scholar
Probert, P. (2011) “Attic irregularities: their reinterpretation in the light of atticism,” in Ancient Scholarship and Grammar, eds. Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A.. Berlin and New York: 269–90.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (1974) Dignitatis contentio: Studien zur Motivation und politischen Taktik im Bürgerkrieg zwischen Caesar und Pompeius. Munich.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2003) “Caesar the liberator? Factional politics, civil war, and ideology,” in Caesar against Liberty? eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, E.. Cambridge: 35–67.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2009) “Bellum Civile,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 175–91.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2010a) “Between tradition and innovation: shifts in Caesar’s political propaganda and self-presentation,” in Cesare: precursore o visionario? ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 141–57.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2010b) “Creating a grand coalition of true Roman citizens: on Caesar’s political strategy in the Civil War,” in Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars, eds. Breed, B., Damon, C., and Rossi, A.. Oxford: 159–70.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. (2002) “The Populus Romanus, imperium, and Caesar’s presence in the De Bello Gallico,” Athenaeum 90: 125–46.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. (2003) “Aspects of propaganda in De Bello Gallico: Caesar’s virtues and attributes,” Athenaeum 91: 331–72.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1953, 2nd edn 1966) L’art de la déformation historique dans les Commentaires de César. Paris.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1960) “L’opposition de Lucain au Bellum Civile de César,” L’Information Littéraire 12: 155–62.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1974) “L’espace dans le récit césarien,” in Littérature gréco-romaine et géographie historique, ed. Chevallier, R.. Paris: 111–29.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1979) “César et la rhétorique: A propos de Cicéron,” in Colloques sur la rhétorique, ed. Chevallier, R., Paris, 19–39.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1980) “César et Catulle,” in Actes du colloque sur l’élégie romaine. Paris: 37–50.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1983) “Le portrait d’Ambiorix,” in Hommages à Jean Cousin. Paris: 113–22.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. (2007) “Roman Senatorial Oratory,” in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Oxford: 122–35.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D. (1963) Caesars Commentarii. Stil und Stilwandel am Beispiel der direkten Rede. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Rawlings, L. (1998) “Caesar’s portrayal of Gauls as warriors,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. London and Swansea: 171–92.Google Scholar
Reggi, G. (2002) “Cesare e il racconto delle battaglie navali sotto Marsiglia,” RIL 136: 71–108.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1912) “Human sacrifices at Rome and other notes on Roman religion,” JRS 2: 34–52.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2008) “Epicurus and Lucretius on the Origins of Language,” CQ 58: 127–40.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N. (2005) Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. and Winterbottom, M. (eds.) (2006) Quintilian, Institutio oratoria, Book 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rice Holmes, T. (1923) The Roman Republic and the Founder of Empire (3 vols.). Oxford.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992, 2nd edn) The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ritter, H. (1989) “Zur Beurteilung der caesarischen und augusteischen Münzpropaganda,” in Caesar und Augustus, eds. Christ, K. and Gabba, E.. Como: 165–82.Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. (2012) “Germania,” in A Companion to Tacitus, ed. Pagán, V.. Malden, MA: 45–61.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Pérez, Y. (2008) The Dutch Revolt through Spanish Eyes: Self and Other in Historical and Literary Texts of Golden Age Spain (c. 1548–1673). Bern.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2004) “Exemplarity in Roman culture: the cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” CP 99: 1–56.Google Scholar
Rondholz, A. (2009) “Crossing the Rubicon: a historiographical study,” Mnemosyne 62: 432–50.Google Scholar
Rood, T. (2007) “The development of the war monograph,” in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J.. Malden, MA: 147–58.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (1999) Latine Loqui: Trends and Directions in the Crystallization of Classical Latin. Munich.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. (1985) “Ancient literary genres: a mirage?” Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature 34: 74–84.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (2009) “General and imperialist,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 85–99.Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. and Liviabella Furiani, P. (1993) “Rodi,” in Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica, eds. Cambiano, G., Canfora, L., and Lanza, D.. Rome: I.2: 657–715.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2000) “The camp of Pompey: strategy of representation in Caesar’s Bellum Ciuile,” CJ 95: 239–56.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2004) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2005) “Sine fine: Caesar’s journey to Egypt and the end of Lucan’s Bellum Civile,” in Lucan im 21. Jahrhundert, ed. Walde, C.. Munich: 237–260.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. (1971) “I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nelle letterature classiche,” BICS 18: 69–94.Google Scholar
Ruffell, I. (2003) “Beyond satire: Horace, popular invective and the segregation of literature,” JRS 93: 35–65.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (1990) “Gerechte Kriege – gerächte Kriege: Die Funktion der Götter in Caesars Darstellung des Helvetierfeldzuges (Gall. 1,12),” AU 33,5: 5–13.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (1994) “Ovids Kalenderkommentar: Zur Gattung der libri fastorum,” Antike und Abendland 40: 125–36.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2005) Fasti sacerdotum: Die Mitglieder der Priesterschaften und das sakrale Funktionspersonal römischer, griechischer, orientalischer und jüdisch-christlicher Kulte in der Stadt Rom von 300 v. Chr. bis 499 n. Chr. Potsdamer altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge 12/1–3. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2007b) “Roman religion – religions of Rome,” in A Companion to the Roman Religion, ed. Rüpke, J.. Malden, MA: 1–9.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2008) Fasti sacerdotum. A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 bc to ad 499. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2009a) “Equus October und ludi Capitolini: Zur rituellen Struktur der Oktoberiden und ihren antiken Deutungen,” in Antike Mythen, eds. Duell, U. and Walde, C.. Berlin: 97–212.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2009b) “Properz: Aitiologische Elegie in Augusteischer Zeit,” in Römische Religion im historischen Wandel, eds. Bendlin, A. and Rüpke, J.. Stuttgart: 115–42.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2011a) Aberglauben oder Individualität? Religiöse Abweichung im römischen Reich. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2011b) The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History and the Fasti. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012a) Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012b) Religiöse Erinnerungskulturen: Formen der Geschichtsschreibung in der römischen Antike. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012c) “Flamines, Salii, and the priestesses of Vesta: Individual decision and differences of social order in the late Republic,” in Demeter, Isis, Vesta and Cybele: Studies in Greek and Roman Religion in honour of Giulia Sfameni Gasparro, eds. Mastrocincque, A. and Scribona, C. G.. Stuttgart: 183–94.Google Scholar
Satô, A. (1964–5) “Sprachliche Kleinigkeit bei Caesar und seinen Fortsetzern,” AIGC 2: 39–46.Google Scholar
Saylor, S. (1999) “Little Caesar and the pirates,” in The House of Vestals, ed. Saylor, S.. London: 137–86.Google Scholar
Scarcia, R. (1993) “La bilancia del critico (Cesare e Terenzio),” in La cultura in Cesare, ed. Poli, D.. Rome: 507–33.Google Scholar
Schadee, H. (2008) “Caesar’s construction of northern Europe: inquiry, contact, and corruption in De Bello Gallico,” CQ 58: 158–80.Google Scholar
Schadee, H. (2015) “The first vernacular Caesar: Pier Candido Decembrio’s translation for Inigo d’Avalos. with editions and translations of both prologues,” Viator 46, 1: 277–304.Google Scholar
Schadee, H. (2016) “Alfonso ‘the Magnanimous’ of Naples as portrayed by Facio and Panormita: Four versions of emulation, representation and virtue,” in Portraying the Prince in the Renaissance: The Humanist Depiction of Rulers in Historiographical and Biographical Texts, eds. Baker, P., Kaiser, R., Priesterjahn, M., and Helmrath, J.. Berlin and Boston, MA: 95–118.Google Scholar
Schadee, H. (2017) “After Caesar: the man and his text over two millennia,” in The Landmark Caesar, ed. Raaflaub, K.. New York.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. (1927) Geschichte der römischen Literatur bis zum Gesetzgebungswerk des Kaisers Justinian. Vol. I: Die römische Literatur in der Zeit der Republik, rev. Carl Hosius. Munich.Google Scholar
Schieffer, R. (1972) “Die Rede des Critognatus (B.G. vii 77) und Caesars Urteil über den Gallischen Krieg,” Gymnasium 79: 477–94.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2007) “Didaxis, rhetoric, and the law in Lucretius,” in Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean, eds. Heyworth, S. J., Harrison, S., and Fowler, P.. Oxford: 63–90.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2010) “Cesare, la cultura di un dittatore,” in Cesare: precursore o visionario? ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 241–7.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. (2007) “Analogia, proportio, ratio: Loanwords, calques, and reinterpretations of a Greek technical word,” in Bilinguisme et terminologie grammaticale gréco-latine, eds. Basset, L. et al. Leuven: 321–38.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1993) Frühschriften Sallusts im Horizont des Gesamtwerks. Neustadt an der Aisch.Google Scholar
Scholz, B. (1956) Untersuchungen über Darstellungsformen des Hirtius im VIII. Buch der Kommentarien über den Gallischen Krieg. Berlin.Google Scholar
Scholz, P. (2011) Den Vätern folgen. Sozialisation und Erziehung der republikanischen Senatsaristokratie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Scholz, U. (1970) Studien zum altitalischen und altrömischen Marskult und Marsmythos. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2004) “Putting Cato the Censor’s Origines in its place,” CA 23: 323–57.Google Scholar
Seager, R. (2003) “Caesar and Gaul: some perspectives on the Bellum Gallicum,” in Caesar against Liberty? eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, E.. Cambridge: 19–34.Google Scholar
Seel, O. (1935) Hirtius: Untersuchungen über die pseudocaesarischen Bella und den Balbusbrief. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Seel, O. (1960) “Ambiorix. Beobachtungen zu Text und Stil in Caesars Bellum Gallicum,” Jahrbuch für fränkische Landesforschung 20: 49–89.Google Scholar
Seel, O. (1961) C. Iulii Caesaris commentarii rerum gestarum. Vol. I: Bellum Gallicum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Siebenborn, E. (1976) Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien. Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Simón, F. (1996) Flamen Dialis: El sacerdote de Júpiter en la religión romana. Madrid.Google Scholar
Simonetta, G. (1932, 2nd edn) De rebus gestis ab Francisci Sfortiae commentarii, Rerum Italicarum Scriptores. Vol. xxi, 2. Bologna.Google Scholar
Simonetti Abbolito, G. (1981) “Cesare o un continuatore Bellum Alexandrinum 1–33?” in Letterature comparate. Problemi e metodo. Studi in onore di E. Paratore. Bologna: 359–71.Google Scholar
Sinclair, P. (1994) “Political declensions in Latin grammar and oratory 55 bce–ce 39,” Ramus 23: 92–109.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. (2012) The Invention of Greek Ethnography: From Homer to Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. (2013) “Troy and trauma in the Aeneid,” in Roman Literature, Gender, and Reception: Domina Illustris, eds. Lateiner, D., Gold, B., and Perkins, J.. New York: 40–52.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2009) “Sulla’s memoirs,” in The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography, eds. Smith, C. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 65–86.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2010) “Rhetorical history: The struggle of the orders in Livy,” in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 264–80.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2013a) “L. Cornelius Sylla,” in The Fragments of the Roman Historians, ed. Cornell, T.. Oxford. Vol. 1: 282–6; vol. 2: 475–91.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2013b) “Lutatius,” in The Fragments of the Roman Historians, ed. Cornell, T.. Oxford. Vol. 1: 341–3.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2013c) “P. Rutilius Rufus,” in The Fragments of the Roman Historians, ed. Cornell, T.. Oxford. Vol. 1: 306–19.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.) (2009) The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography. Swansea.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. (2001) “Un errore nel calendario di Cesare e la sua origine,” in Poikilma. La Spezia: 1225–9.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. (2009) “Roman Alexanders: epistemology and identity,” in Alexander the Great: A New History, eds. Heckel, W. and Tritle, L. A.. Oxford: 251–74.Google Scholar
Spilman, M. (1932) Cumulative Sentence Building in Latin Historical Narrative. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Spurr, D. (1993) The Rhetoric of Empire. Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Stein-Hölkeskamp, E., and Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (eds.) (2006) Erinnerungsorte der Antike. Die römische Welt. Munich.Google Scholar
Stekelenburg, A. V. van (1976) “Lucan and Cassius Dio as heirs to Livy. The speech of Julius Caesar at Placentia,” Acta Classica 19: 43–57.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. (1952) “The Bellum Gallicum as a work of propaganda,” Latomus 11: 3–18, 165–79.Google Scholar
Storch, R. H. (1973) “The author of the De Bello Hispaniensi. A cavalry officer?,” CJ 68: 381–3.Google Scholar
Storch, R. H. (1977) “The author of the De Bello Hispaniensi: A cavalry officer?” A Class 20: 201–4.Google Scholar
Strada, F. (1650) De Bello Belgico. The History of the Low-Countrye Warres, trans. Stapylton, R.. London.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1938) Caesars Eintritt in die Geschichte. Munich; reprinted in Strasburger (1982): 181–327.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1953, 2nd edn 1968, Darmstadt) “Caesar im Urteil seiner Zeitgenossen,” Historische Zeitschrift 175: 225–64; reprinted in Strasburger (1982): 343–421.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1982) Studien zur Alten Geschichte, I., eds. Schmitthenner, W. and Zoepffel, R.. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (2002) “Historiographie und Verwandtes,” in Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur I, eds. Herzog, R. and Schmidt, P.. Munich: 345–458.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (2011) “The late Republic: autobiographies and memoirs in the age of the civil wars,” in Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion, ed. Marasco, G.. Leiden: 161–87.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2007) “Social commentary and political invective,” in A Companion to Catullus, ed. Skinner, M.. Malden, MA: 333–53.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2011) “Choice word and measured phrase in Caesar, fragment 1 (Courtney),” Philologus 155: 375–9.Google Scholar
Taunton, N. (2001) 1590s Drama and Militarism: Portrayals of War in Marlowe, Chapman and Shakespeare’s Henry V. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1951) “On the chronology of Caesar’s first consulship,” AJP 72: 254–68.Google Scholar
Tierney, J. (1959) “The Celtic ethnography of Posidonius,” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 60: 189–275.Google Scholar
Torigian, C. (1998) “The Λόγος of Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. London and Swansea: 45–60.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. (1988) Caesar’s War in Alexandria: Bellum Civile III, 102–112; Bellum Alexandrinum 1–33. Bristol.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. (2011) “Internal evidence for the completeness of the Bellum Civile,” in Brill’s Companion to Lucan, ed. Asso, P.. Leiden: 33–53.Google Scholar
Tschiedel, H. (2012) “Caesar im Bellum Hispaniense,” in Zwischen Antike und Moderne. Festschrift für J. Malitz, eds. Hartmann, A. and Weber, G.. Speyer: 37–51.Google Scholar
Tsitsiou-Chelidoni, C. (2010) “Macht, Rhetorik, Autorität: zur Funktion der Reden Caesars und seiner Gegner in De Bello Gallico,” in Stimmen der Geschichte, ed. Pausch, D.. Berlin: 125–55.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. B. (1993) “Julius Caesar and the creation of the Forum Iulium,” AJA 97: 49–80.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. B. (1994) The Roman Orator and the Sacred Stage: The Roman Templum Rostratum. Brussels.Google Scholar
Utard, R. (2004) Le discours indirect chez les historiens latins, écriture ou oralité? Histoire d’un style. Louvain.Google Scholar
Utard, R. (2006) “L’Eloquence stratégique en discours indirect chez César, Tite-Live, et Tacite. Essai comparé,” REL 84: 62–81.Google Scholar
Van den Hout, Michel P. J. (1999) A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto. Leiden.Google Scholar
Van Heck, A. (1991) “Amator vetusti ritus et observator diligens: stile et modelli stilistici di Pio II,” in Pio II e la cultura del suo tempo, ed. Tarugi, L.. Milan: 119–32.Google Scholar
Van Laer, S. (2010) La préverbation en latin: étude des préverbes ad-, in-, ob- et per- dans la poésie républicaine et augustéenne. Brussels.Google Scholar
Vanggaard, J. (1988) The Flamen: A Study in the History and Sociology of Roman Religion. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Verbrugghe, G. (1989) “On the meaning of Annales, on the meaning of annalist,” Philologus 133: 192–230.Google Scholar
Verdugo, F. (1872) Comentario del Colonel Francisco Verdugo de la guerra de Frisia, intr. de Velasco, A. Velazquez. Madrid.Google Scholar
Vere, F. (1903) “The commentaries of Sir Francis Vere,” in Stuart Tracts 1603–1693, ed. Firth, C.. New York: 83–210.Google Scholar
Verlinksy, A. (2005) “Epicurus and his predecessors on the origin of language,” in Language and Learning, eds. Inwood, B. and Frede, D.. Cambridge: 56–100.Google Scholar
Vielhaber, L. (1968) Review of Dübner, F., C. Julii Caesaris Commentarii de bellis Gallico et Civili: Aliorum de bellis Alexandrino, Africano et Hispaniensi, (2 vols.). Paris, 1867, in Zeitschrift für das österreichische Gymnasialwesen 20: 541–76.Google Scholar
Vitale, M. T. (1977) “Cesellio Vindice,” Studi e ricerche dell’Istituto di Latino 1: 221–58.Google Scholar
Vogel, F. (1900) “Über die Entstehung des Bellum Gallicum,” Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum, Geschichte und Deutsche Litteratur und für Pädagogik 5.3: 217–20.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1985) “Speeches in Greek historians,” in Selected Papers. Cambridge: 242–61.Google Scholar
Walser, G. (1953) “Caesars Entdeckung der Germanen und die Tendenz des Bellum Gallicum,” ESHG 11: 5–26.Google Scholar
Walser, G. (1956) Caesar und die Germanen. Studien zur Tendenz römischer Feldzugsberichte. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Walser, G. (1995) “Zu Caesars Tendenz in der geographischen Beschreibung Galliens,” Klio 77: 217–23.Google Scholar
Walser, G. (1998) Bellum Helveticum. Studien zum Beginn der caesarischen Eroberung von Gallien. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Walter, U. (2003) “Natam me consule Romam. Historisch-politische Autobiographien in republikanischer Zeit – ein Überblick,“ AU 46.2: 36–43.Google Scholar
Walter, U. (2010) “Caesar macht Geschichte: Memorialpolitik und Historiographie zwischen Konvention und Innovation,” in Cesare: precursore o visionario? ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 159–73.Google Scholar
Ward, A. (1977) “Caesar and the pirates II: the elusive M. Iunius Iuncus and the year 75/4,” AJAH 2: 26–36.Google Scholar
Watkins, O. (1987) ‘Caesar solus? Senatorial support for the Lex Gabinia,’ Historia 36: 120–1.Google Scholar
Watt, W. S. (ed.) (1958) Cicero, Epistulae III: Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem, Epistulae ad Brutum, Fragmenta epistularum. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Webb, H. (1965) Elizabethan Military Science: The Books and Practice. Madison, Milwaukee and London.Google Scholar
Weber, G. and Zimmermann, M. (2003) Propaganda, Selbstdarstellung, Repräsentation im römischen Kaiserreich des 1. Jhs. n. Chr. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Webster, J. (1999) “At the end of the world: druidic and other revitalization movements in post-conquest Gaul and Britain,” Britannia 30: 1–20.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (1998) “Caesar and his officers in the Gallic War Commentaries,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. London and Swansea: 85–110.Google Scholar
Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.) (1998) Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments. London and Swansea.Google Scholar
Welwei, K.-W. (1989) “Si vis pacem para bellum – eine Maxime römischer Politik?” in Krieg und Frieden im Altertum, eds. Binder, G. and Effe, B.. Trier: 85–109.Google Scholar
West, D. (1970) “Virgilian multiple-correspondence similes and their antecedents,” Philologus 114: 262–75.Google Scholar
Westall, R. (1996) “The Forum Iulium as representation of Imperator Caesar.” MDAI(R) 103: 83–118.Google Scholar
White, H. (1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
White, P. (1997) “Julius Caesar and the publication of Acta in late Republican Rome,” Chiron 27: 73–84.Google Scholar
White, P. (2003) “Tactics in Caesar’s correspondence with Cicero,” in Caesar against Liberty? eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, E.. Cambridge: 68–95.Google Scholar
White, P. (2010) Cicero in Letters. Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wightman, E. M. (1975) “Priscae Gallorum Memoriae: some comments on sources for a history of Gaul,” in The Ancient Historian and His Materials, ed. Levick, E.. Farnborough: 93–107.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2010) “Campaigning for utilitas: style, grammar and philosophy in C. Iulius Caesar,” in Colloquial and Literary Latin, eds. Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A.. Cambridge: 229–42.Google Scholar
Williams, C. (1999) Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1982) “Phases in political patronage of literature in Rome,” in Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome, ed. Gold, B.. Austin: 3–27.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (1985) “Caesar’s Bibracte narrative and the aims of Caesarian style,” ICS 10: 215–26.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2003) “The Sidus Iulium, the divinity of men, and the Golden Age in Virgil’s Aeneid,” Leeds International Classical Studies 2.1: 1–29.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1983) “Caesar,” in Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics, eds. Reynolds, L. and Wilson, N.. Oxford: 35–6.Google Scholar
Wintjes, J. (2006) “From Capitano to great commander: the military reception of Caesar from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries,” in Julius Caesar in Western Culture, ed. Wyke, M.. Malden, MA: 269–84.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1974) “Legendary genealogies in late-Republican Rome,” G&R 21: 153–64.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1979) Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Leicester.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1981) “Practice and theory in Roman historiography,” History 66: 375–93.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1985) “Competition and cooperation,” in Roman Political Life, 90 bc –ad 69, ed. Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 3–20.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1998) “The publication of De Bello Gallico,” in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 1–9.Google Scholar
Wishart, G. (1893) Deeds of Montrose 1639–1650, eds. Murdoch, A. and Simpson, H.. London.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (1995) “Greeks, Romans, and the rise of Atticism,” in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle, eds. Abbenes, J. et al. Amsterdam: 65–82.Google Scholar
Wisse, J., Winterbottom, M. and Fantham, E. (eds.) (2008) M. Tullius Cicero De oratore libri III: A Commentary, v: Book III, 96–230. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wittchow, F. (2005) “Vater und Onkel – Julius Caesar und das Finale der Aeneis,” Gymnasium 112: 45–69.Google Scholar
Witte, K. (1910) “Über die Form der Darstellung in Livius’ Geschichtswerk,” RhM 65: 270–305, 359–419.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, E. (1888) “Krieg und Frieden im Sprichworte der Römer.” Sitzungs-Berichte der Bayerischen Akademie, phil.-hist. Kl. I: 197–215.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, E. (1893a) “Ennius und das Bellum Hispaniense,” Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie 8: 596–7.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, E. (1893b) “Elegantia Caesaris,” Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie 8: 142–3.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, E. (1902) “Sprachliches zum Bellum Hispaniense,” Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie 12: 159–71.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, E. and Miodoński, A. S. (1889) C. Asini Polionis De Bello Africo Commentarius. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. (2011) “Cicero and the writing of history,” in Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J.. Oxford: 241–90.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. (ed.) (2014) Tacitus Agricola. With contributions by Kraus, C. S.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (1998) Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2011) Tales of the Barbarians: Ethnography and Empire in the Roman West. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wyss, E. (1930) Stilistische Untersuchungen zur Darstellung von Ereignissen in Caesars Bellum Gallicum. Lachen.Google Scholar
Yavetz, Z. (1990) “The personality of Augustus: reflections on Syme’s Roman Revolution,” in Between Republic and Empire, eds. Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M.. Berkeley, CA: 21–41.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. V. (2005) “‘Stabbed with large pens’: trajectories of literacy in Plutarch’s Lives,” in The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works, vol. 2, ed. de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M.. Leiden: 113–37.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (2009) “The irritating statues and contradictory portraits of Julius Caesar,” in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden, MA: 288–314.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (1980) “La morte di Catone e l’opposizione intellettuale a Cesare e ad Augusto,” Athenaeum 58: 39–56.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (1993) “Gli scritti giovanili di Cesare e la censura di Augusto,” in La cultura in Cesare, ed. Poli, D.. Rome: 191–205.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (2009) “Die öffentlichen Räume des Dictators Caesar,” in Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Munich: 183–94.Google Scholar
Zieske, L. (2010) “Iulius Caesar in Vergils Aeneis: Ein Beitrag zu Vergils dichterischer Haltung,” Gymnasium 117: 129–40.Google Scholar
Zingerle, J. (1892) “Zur Frage der Autorschaft des Bellum Alexandrinum und dessen Stellung im Corpus Caesarianum,” Wiener Studien 14: 75–119.Google Scholar
Zinn, E. (1960) “Elemente des Humors in augusteischer Dichtung,” Gymnasium 67: 41–56, 152–5.Google Scholar
Zinserling, G. (1959–60) “Studien zu den Historiendarstellungen der römischen Republik,” Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena 9: 403–38.Google Scholar
Zissos, A. (2013) “Lucan and Caesar: Epic and Commentarius,” in Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature, eds. Papanghelis, T., Harrison, S., and Frangoulidis, S.. Berlin: 135–50.Google Scholar