Anderson, Simon P. et al. 2012. “Push-Me Pull-You: Comparative Advertising in the OTC Analgesics Industry.” Unpublished manuscript, last updated June 18, 2015. doi: 10.2139/2047106.Google Scholar

Areeda, Phillip E. and Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2006. Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, 3rd edn. Vols. 2B, 3A New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Ching, Andrew T. 2010. Consumer Learning and Heterogeneity: Dynamics of Demand for Prescription Drugs after Patent Expiration. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28, 619–38.Google Scholar

Coate, Malcolm B. and Simons, Joseph J.. 2012. In Defense of Market Definition. The Antitrust Bulletin, 57, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Datamonitor. 2011. Industry Profile: Bleach in the United States. 2 Ref. No. 0072–0013.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2012. Markets in IP & Antitrust. Georgetown Law Journal, 100, 2133–58.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, Janis, Mark, Lemley, Mark, and Leslie, Christopher. 2010. IP and Antitrust, 2nd edn. Vol. 1. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis. 2010. Why (Ever) Define Markets?. Harvard Law Review, 124, 437–517.Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis. 2011. “Market Share Thresholds: On the Conflation of Empirical Assessments and Legal Policy Judgments.” Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 692. doi: 10.2139/1873431.Google Scholar

Leslie, Christopher R. 2004. Trust, Distrust, and Antitrust, Texas Law Review, 82, 515–680.Google Scholar

Lindstrom, Martin. 2008. Buyology: Truth and Lies about Why We Buy. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Markovits, Richard S. 1978. Predicting the Competitive Impact of Horizontal Mergers in a Monopolistically Competitive World: A Non-Market-Oriented Proposal and Critique of the Market Definition-Market Share-Market Concentration Approach. Texas Law Review, 56, 587–731.Google Scholar

Reeves, Amanda P. and Stucke, Maurice E.. 2011. Behavioral Antitrust. Indiana Law Journal, 86, 1527–86.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Daniel A. 2011. Shutting the Back Door: Using American Needle to Cure the Problem of Improper Market Definition. Michigan Law Review, 110, 295–318.Google Scholar

U.S. DOJ and FTC (United States Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission). 1992. Horizontal Merger Guidelines. 57 Fed. Reg. 41,552 (Sept. 10).Google Scholar

U.S. DOJ and FTC (United States Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission). 2010. Horizontal Merger Guidelines.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Blair, Roger D. and Cotter, Thomas. 1998. An Economic Analysis of Damages Rules in Intellectual Property Law. William & Mary Law Review, 39, 1585–694.Google Scholar

Blair, Roger D. and Cotter, Thomas. 2005. Intellectual Property: Economic and Legal Dimensions of Rights and Remedies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bond, Eric W. and Saggi, Kamal. 2014. Compulsory Licensing, Price Controls, and Access to Patented Foreign Products. Journal of Development Economics, 109, 217–28.Google Scholar

Cotter, Thomas. 2013. Comparative Patent Remedies: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Delcamp, Henry. 2015. Are Patent Pools a Way to Help Patent Owners Enforce their Rights? International Review of Law and Economics, 41: 68–76.Google Scholar

Healy, Maura. 2016. Letter to Dr. John C. Martin, Chairman and CEO, of Gilead Sciences, Inc.. dated January 22, 2016; available at http://src.bna.com/cfb.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert and Hovenkamp, Eric. 2015. Patent Pools and Related Technology Sharing. Antitrust and Intellectual Property, Edition 1, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A. and Klenow, Peter J.. 1994. Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1200–27.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, Bruce. 2008. Spilled Ink or Economic Progress? The Supreme Court’s Decision in Illinois Tool Works v. Independent Ink. Antitrust Bulletin, 53, 5–33.Google Scholar

Krattenmaker, Thomas G., Lande, Robert H., and Salop, Steven C.. 1987. Monopoly Power and Market Power in Antitrust Law. Georgetown Law Journal, 76(2), 241–69.Google Scholar

Kultti, Klaus, Takalo, Tuomas, and Toikka, Juuso. 2006. Simultaneous Model of Innovation, Secrecy, and Patent Policy. American Economic Review, 96(2), 82–6.Google Scholar

Kwon, Illoong. 2012. Patent Races with Secrecy. Journal of Industrial Economics, 60(3), 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lampe, Ryan and Moser, Petra. 2013. Patent Pools and Innovation in Substitute Technologies – Evidence from the 19th-Century Sewing Machine Industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 44(4), 757–78.Google Scholar

Lerner, Abba. 1934. The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power. Review of Economic Studies, 1, 157–75.Google Scholar

Lerner, Josh and Tirole, Jean. 2004. Efficient Patent Pools. American Economic Review, 94(3), 691–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lim, Daryl. 2015. Patent Holdups. Antitrust and Intellectual Property, Edition 1, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miceli, Thomas J. and Adelstein, Richard P.. 2006. An Economic Model of Fair Use. Information Economics and Policy, 18, 359–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moser, Petra and Voena, Alessandra. 2012. Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act. American Economic Review, 102(1), 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordhaus, William D. 1969. An Economic Theory of Technological Change. American Economic Review, 59(2), 18–28.Google Scholar

Seifert, Jacob. 2015. Welfare Effects of Compulsory Licensing. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 48, 317–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Carl. 1982. Consumer Information, Product Quality, and Seller Reputation. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 20–35.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Carl. 2000. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1, 119–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stavropoulou, Charitini and Valletti, Tommaso. 2015. Compulsory Licensing and Access to Drugs. European Journal of Health Economics, 16(1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stokey, Nancy L. 1988. Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New Goods. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 701–17.Google Scholar

Akman, Pinar. 2009. The Role of Exploitation in Abuse under Article 82 EC. In Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 11, 165–88.Google Scholar

Besen, Stanley M. and Levinson, Robert J.. 2009. Standards, Intellectual Property Disclosure, and Patent Royalties after Rambus. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 10, 233, 249–53.Google Scholar

Chin, Yee Wah. 2015. Intellectual Property Rights and Intellectual Property in China. In Suchy, Donna (ed.), IP Protection in China. ABA, pp. 313, 314.Google Scholar

Contreras, Jorge L. 2015a. Standards, Royalty Stacking, and Collective Action. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, March (1). Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/file/view/7353.Google Scholar

Contreras, Jorge L. 2015b. A Market Reliance Theory for FRAND Commitments and Other Patent Pledges. Utah Law Review, 501–17.Google Scholar

Cotter, Thomas F. 2009. Patent Holdup, Patent Remedies, and Antitrust Responses. Iowa Journal of Corporate Law, 34, 1151, 1194–1200.Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A., 2010. Patent Pools, RAND Commitments, and the Problematics of Price Discrimination. In Dreyfuss, Rochelle C., First, Harry, and Zimmerman, Diane L. (eds.), Working Within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. New York: Oxford University Press, 372–8.Google Scholar

Dou, Eva. 2015. Qualcomm Spared Some of the Worst Penalties by Chinese Authorities, Wall Street Journal, February 10.Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle C. 1986. Dethroning Lear: Licensee Estoppel and the Incentive to Innovate. Virginia Law Review, 72, 709–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

First, Harry. 2007. Controlling the Intellectual Property Grab: Protect Innovation, Not Innovators. Rutgers Law Review, 38, 365–98.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Samir R., Metanios, Fadi, and Dadwal, Hemangini. 2015. Competition Law and FRAND: Developments and Challenges in India. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, October (1). Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/assets/Uploads/GandhietalOct-151.pdf.Google Scholar

Harris, H. Stephen Jr. 2015. An Overview of the NDRC Decision in the Qualcomm Investigation. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, July, 2, 4. Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/file/view/7409.Google Scholar

Hou, Liyang. 2015a. Antitrust Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in China, 6–7. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2648736.Google Scholar

Hou, Liyang. 2015b. The Qualcomm Decision: Protectionism? And for Whom? Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2648741.Google Scholar

InterDigital, Inc., Form 10-K Annual Report for 2015 (2016). Available at http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/IDCC/1618089504x0xS1405495-16-47/1405495/filing.pdf.Google Scholar

Kim, Yoonhee and Yang, Hui-Jin. 2015. A Brief Overview of Qualcomm v. Korea Fair Trade Commission. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 2, 6, 7. Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/file/view/7352.Google Scholar

Lee, In Ho, 2012. Qualcomm’s Abuse of Dominance, at 22–23. Available at http://eng.ftc.go.kr/bbs.do?command=getList&type_cd=54&pageId=0302.Google Scholar

Lee, William F. and Melamed, A. Douglas. 2016. Breaking the Vicious Cycle of Patent Damages. Cornell Law Review, 101, 385–466.Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. and Shapiro, Carl. 2007. Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking. Texas Law Review, 85, 1991–2049.Google Scholar

Maldonado, Kassandra. 2014. Breaching RAND and Reaching for Reasonable: Microsoft v. Motorola and Standard-Essential Patent Litigation. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 29, 419–20.Google Scholar

Mozur, Paul and Hardy, Quentin. 2015. China Hits Qualcomm with Fine, New York Times, February 9.Google Scholar

Mu-hyun, Cho. 2015. Qualcomm Facing Penalty from South Korean Antitrust Regulator. ZD Net. Available at www.zdnet.com/article/qualcomm-facing-penalty-from-south-korean-antitrust-regulator/.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, Robert and Padilla, Jorge. 2006. The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC 174. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Qualcomm, Inc. 2015. 10-Q for period ending 12/28/14, at 13. Available at http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/QCOM/343973291x0xS1234452-15-24/804328/filing.pdf.Google Scholar

Scotchmer, Suzanne. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 31.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Carl. 2001. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross-Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting. In Jaffe, Adam B. et al. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tsai, Joanna and Wright, Joshua D.. 2015. Standard Setting, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Role of Antitrust in Regulating Incomplete Contracts. Antitrust Law Journal, 80, 157, 162–65.Google Scholar

US Department of Justice and U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. 2013. Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/Rand Commitments, 4.Google Scholar

US Federal Trade Commission 2011. The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition, 189, 190, 192.Google Scholar

Wright, Joshua D. and Ginsburg, Douglas H.. 2015. Comment Regarding the Japan Fair Trade Commission’s Draft Partial Amendment to the Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Antimonopoly Act. Available at www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/693631/150803japantradecomments.pdf.Google Scholar

Acacia Technologies. n.d. About Us. Available at http://acaciaresearch.com/about-us/.Google Scholar

Allison, John, Lemley, Mark A., and Walker, Joshua. 2011. Patent Quality and Settlement among Repeat Patent Litigants. Georgetown Law Journal, 99, 677–712.Google Scholar

Bessen, James. 2014. All the Facts: PAEs Are Suing Many More Companies. Patently-O, January. Available at http://patentlyo.com/patent/2014/01/facts-suing-companies.html.Google Scholar

Blind, Knut, Bekkers, Rudi, Dietrich, Yann, et al. 2011. Study on the Interplay between Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs). Tender No ENTR/09/015 (OJEU S136 of 18/07/2009). Final Report, April.Google Scholar

Breed, Logan M. and Dickinson, Charles E.. 2013. FTC Formally Proposes to Launch Section 6(b) Study on Activities of Patent Assertion Entities. Lexology (September). Available at www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f0d6333f-ef37-484d–8d09-5428e52b7e06.Google Scholar

Carlton, Dennis W. and Shampine, Allan L.. 2014. Identifying Benchmarks for Applying Non-Discrimination in FRAND. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 8(1), 3–6.Google Scholar

Cass, Ronald A. 2015. Lessons from the Smartphone Wars: Patent Litigants, Patent Quality, and Software. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, 16, 1–61.Google Scholar

Chan, Nicholas P. 2012. Balancing Judicial Misvaluation and Patent Hold-Up: Some Principles for Considering Injunctive Relief after eBay. University of California Law Review, 59, 746–87.Google Scholar

Chemtob, Stuart M. 2015. Carte Blanche for SSOs? The Antitrust Division’s Business Review Letter on the IEEE’s Patent Policy Update. CPI Antitrust Chronicle.Google Scholar

Chien, Colleen V. 2010. From Arms Race to Marketplace: The Complex Patent Ecosystem and Its Implications for the Patent System. Hastings Law Journal, 62, 297–355.Google Scholar

Chien, Colleen V. 2012. Reforming Software Patents. Houston Law Review, 50, 325–90.Google Scholar

Chien, Colleen V. 2014. Holding Up and Holding Out. Michigan Telecommunication and Technology Law Review, 21, 1–42.Google Scholar

Chien, Colleen V. and Reines, Ed. 2014. Why Technology Customers Are Being Sued En Masse for Patent Infringement and What Can Be Done. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 235–57.Google Scholar

Contreras, Jorge L. 2015. A Market Reliance Theory for FRAND Commitments and Other Patent Pledges. Utah Law Review, 479–558.Google Scholar

Decker, Susan and King, Ian. 2015. Qualcomm says it Won’t Follow New Wi-Fi Rules on Patents. Bloomberg Business, February. Available at www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-11/qualcomm-says-new-wi-fi-standard-rules-unfair-may-not-take-part.Google Scholar

Divine, David A., Goldstein, Richard W. et al. 2013. Report of the Economic Survey 2013. American Intellectual Property Law Association. Available at www.patentinsurance.com/custdocs/2013AIPLA%20Survey.pdf.Google Scholar

Economist. 2013, Trolls on the Hill: Congress Takes Aim at Patent Abusers. December.Google Scholar

Executive Office of the President. 2013. Patent Assertion and U.S. Innovation. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/patent_report.pdf.Google Scholar

Faas, Ryan. 2012. Apple’s Secret Weapon in the Patent Wars is a Nuclear NORAD. Cult of Mac, May. Available at www.cultofmac.com/ 168696/apples-secret-weaponin-the-patent-wars-is-a-nuclear-norad/.Google Scholar

Feldman, Robin. 2013. Patent Demands & Startup Companies: The View from the Venture Capital Community. University of California Hastings College of Law Research Paper No. 75. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2346338.Google Scholar

Feldman, Robin and Lemley, Mark. 2015. Does Patent Licensing Mean Innovation?. Working paper. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2565292.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Douglas H., Owings, Taylor M., and Wright, Joshua D.. 2014. Enjoining Injunctions: The Case against Antitrust Liability for Standard Essential Patents. Antitrust Source, October, 1–7.Google Scholar

Google. n.d. The LOT Agreement. Available at www.google.com/patents/licensing/lot/.Google Scholar

Gotts, Ilene Knable and Sher, Scott. 2012. The Particular Antitrust Concerns with Patent Acquisitions. Competition Law International, August.Google Scholar

Han, Michael and Kexin, Lin. 2013. Huawei v. InterDigital: China at the Crossroads of Antitrust and Intellectual Property, Competition and Innovation. Competition Pol’y Int’l, November. Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/huawei-v-interdigital-china-at-the-crossroads-of-antitrust-and-intellectual-property-competition-and-innovation/.Google Scholar

Harris, Robert G. 2014. Patent Assertion Entities and Privateers: Economic Harms to Innovation and Competition. The Antitrust Bulletin, 59(2), 281–325.Google Scholar

Hesse, Renata. 2012a. Six “Small” Proposals for SSOs before Lunch. Department of Justice Antitrust Division. Presentation, October 10, 2012.Google Scholar

Hesse, Renata. 2012b. The Antitrust Division and SSOs: Continuing the Dialogue. Department of Justice Antitrust Division. Presentation, November 8, 2012.Google Scholar

Hesse, Renata. 2013. The Art of Persuasion: Competition Advocacy at the Intersection of Antitrust and Intellectual Property. Department of Justice Antitrust Division. Presentation, November 8, 2013.Google Scholar

Hesse, Renata. 2014a. At the Intersection of Antitrust and Hi-Tech: Opportunities for Constructive Engagement. Department of Justice Antitrust Division. Presentation, January 22, 2014.Google Scholar

Hesse, Renata. 2014b. A Year in the Life of the Joint DO-PTO Policy Statement on Remedies for F/RAND Encumbered Standards-Essential Patents. Department of Justice Antitrust Division. Presentation, March 25, 2014.Google Scholar

Hoffinger, Roy E. 2015. The 2015 DOJ IEEE Business Review Letter: The Triumph of Industrial Policy Preferences over Law and Evidence. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, March.Google Scholar

Hollman, Hugh M. 2015. IEEE Business Review Letter: The DOJ Reveals Its Hand. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, March.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, Janis, Mark D., and Lemley, Mark A.. 2012. IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law. Austin, TX: Aspen, § 35.5.Google Scholar

IEEE-SA Standard Board Bylaws. 2015. Available at http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/approved-changes.pdf.Google Scholar

Israel, Sharon A. 2015. Draft AIPLA Comments to Japan FTC IP Guidelines. Drafted July 21, 2015, updated August 6, 2015.Google Scholar

Jurata, John “Jay” Jr. and Patel, Amisha R.. 2014. Taming the Trolls: Why Antitrust Is Not a Viable Solution for Stopping Patent Assertion Entities. George Mason Law Review, 21, 1251–85.Google Scholar

Landau, Nicholas J. and Neu, Jake. 2015. Innovators Beware! Patent Reform Creates the New “Anti-Patent” Troll. Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, July.Google Scholar

Larouche, Pierre and Zingales, Nicolo. 2014. Injunctive Relief in Disputes Related to Standard-Essential Patents: Time for the CJEU to Set Fair and Reasonable Presumptions. TILEC Discussion Paper DP, December, 2014-048.Google Scholar

Lee, Michelle K. 2015. Remarks at the IPO Education Foundation PTO IPO Day Luncheon. Keynote speech, March 10, 2015. Available at www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/remarks-michelle-k-lee-ipo-education-foundation-pto-ipo-day-luncheonGoogle Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. 2007. Should Patent Infringement Require Proof of Copying?. Michigan Law Review, 105, 1525–36.Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. and, Melamed, Douglas A.. 2013. Missing the Forest for the Trolls. Columbia Law Review, 113, 2117–89.Google Scholar

Lim, Daryl. 2010. Post-eBay: A Brave New World?. European Intellectual Property Review, 10, 483–5.Google Scholar

Lim, Daryl. 2011. Misconduct in Standard Setting: The Case for Patent Misuse. IDEA, 51, 559–604.Google Scholar

Lim, Daryl. 2014. Standard Essential Patents, Trolls, and the Smartphone Wars: Triangulating the End Game. Penn State Law Review, 119, 1–91.Google Scholar

Lim, Daryl. 2015. Why Samsung Owes Apple $930 Million. RealClearPolicy, June. Available at www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2015/06/08/why_samsung_owes_apple_930_million_1318.html.Google Scholar

Mehra, Salil and Yanbei, Meng. 2015. Essential Facilities with Chinese Characteristics: A Different Perspective on the Conditional Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 3, 1–13.Google Scholar

Merges, Robert and Kuhn, Jeffrey. 2009. An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards. California Law Review, 97, 1–50.Google Scholar

Moorhead, Patrick. 2015. Qualcomm Settlement With China’s NDRC Removes Major Speedbump. Forbes, February. Available at www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmoorhead/2015/02/10/qualcomm-settlement-with-chinas-ndrc-removes-major-speedbump/.Google Scholar

Morrow, Charlene M., Levin, Adam M., and Hill, Tammi L.. 2014. To Join or Not to Join: When Membership in a Standard-Setting Organization Is the Question. Fenwick & West LLP, December.Google Scholar

Morton, Fiona Scott and Shapiro, Carl. 2015. Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?. National Bureau of Economic Research, April. Available at www.nber.org/chapters/c13587.pdf.Google Scholar

Mulligan, Christina and Lee, Timothy B.. 2012. Scaling the Patent System. New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 68, 289–317.Google Scholar

New York Times. 2012. Fighters in a Patent War. October. Available at www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/08/business/Fighters-in-a-Patent-War.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Non-SDO Patent Statements and Commitments. 2014. Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property. Updated June 21, 2014. Available at www.pijip.org/non-sdo-patent-commitments/.Google Scholar

Popofsky, Mark S. and Laufert, Michael D.. 2013. Patent Assertion Entities and Antitrust: Operating Company Patent Transfers. Antitrust Source, April, 1–13. Available at www.ropesgray.com/~/media/Files/articles/2013/04/Antitrust-Attacks-on-Patent-Assertion-Entities.pdf.Google Scholar

Pridham, David. 2015. Patent Licensing Is as American as Apple Pie. IP Watchdog, March.Google Scholar

Prywes, Daniel I. and Bell, Robert S. K.. 2015. Patent Hold-Up: Down But Not Out. Antitrust Source, 29(3), 25–30.Google Scholar

Quinn, Gene. 2015a. Understanding the valuable role played by Patent Trolls. IP Watchdog, March. Available at www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/03/17/understanding-the-valuable-role-played-by-patent-trolls/id=55787/.Google Scholar

Quinn, Gene. 2015b. Tactics for Coping with New Realities of Monetizing Innovation. IP Watchdog, July. Available at www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/07/09/tactics-for-coping-with-new-realities-of-monetizing-innovation/id=59680/.Google Scholar

Raack, D. W. 1986. A History of Injunctions in England Before 1700. Indiana Law Journal, 61, 539–92.Google Scholar

Sadler, Rodger. 2013. Reconsidering Claim Construction Standard of Review. Law360, April. Available at www.law360.com/articles/433763/reconsidering-claim-construction-standard-of-review.Google Scholar

Santore, Rudy, McKee, Michael, and Bjornstad, David. 2010. Patent Pools as a Solution to Efficient Licensing of Complementary Patents? Some Experimental Evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, 53, 167–83.Google Scholar

Schindler, Jacob. 2015. Nokia/Alcatel Tie-up Cleared in China following Patent Promises and a Timely Joint Venture. Intellectual Assert Magazine. Available at www.iam-media.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=8f11696a-3c3b-4ff6-a690-09c1439e188cGoogle Scholar

Seaman, Christopher B. 2016. Permanent Injunctions in Patent Litigation after eBay: An Empirical Study. Iowa Law Review, 101, 1949.Google Scholar

Sidak, J. Gregory. 2015. The Antitrust Division’s Devaluation of Standard-Essential Patents. Georgetown Law Journal Online, 104, 48–73.Google Scholar

Siebrasse, Norman V. and Cotter, Thomas F.. 2015. A New Framework for Determining Reasonable Royalties in Patent Litigation. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2528616.Google Scholar

Soames, Trevor, and Rato, Miguel. 2015. The Court of Justice’s Preliminary Ruling in Huawei v. ZTE: The Final Word?. Shearman & Sterling LLP, July.Google Scholar

Sokol, D. Daniel. 2017. “Patent Privateers” in Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sperling, Gene. 2013. Taking on Patent Trolls to Protect American Innovation. The White House Blog, June. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/06/04/taking-patent-trolls-protect-american-innovation.Google Scholar

Sundararaman, Deepa. 2015. Inside The IEEE’s Important Changes To Patent Policy. Law360, April.Google Scholar

Tung, Liam. 2015. China Gives Nod to Nokia-Alcatel Deal After Extracting Patent Promise, ZDNET (October). Available at www.zdnet.com/article/china-gives-nod-to-nokia-alcatel-deal-after-extracting-patent-promise/.Google Scholar

US Department of Justice. 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Incorporated. Business Review Letter, February. 2015 WL 557991.Google Scholar

US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (US DOJ-FTC). 2007. Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition. April.Google Scholar

US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (DOJ-FTC). 2010. Horizontal Merger Guidelines §§ 6–7.Google Scholar

US Federal Trade Commission. 2011. The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition.Google Scholar

US Federal Trade Commission. 2013. FTC Seeks to Examine Patent Assertion Entities and Their Impact on Innovation, Competition. FTC Press Releases, September 27. Available at www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2013/09/ftc-seeks-examine-patent-assertion-entities-their-impact.Google Scholar

US Federal Trade Commission. 2014. Settlement Bars Patent Assertion Entity from using Deceptive Tactics.Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office. 2013. Intellectual Property: Assessing Factors that Affect Patent Infringement Litigation Could Help Improve Patent Quality. Gao-13–465.Google Scholar

US International Trade Commission. 2013. In re Certain Elec. Devices, Including Wireless Commc’n Devices, Portable Music & Data Processing Devices, & Tablet Computers. Inv. No. 337-TA-794. Commission Opinion, July.Google Scholar

Whitfield, Angelina M. 2015. Blocking Eco-Patent Trolls: Using Federalism to Foster Innovation in Environmental Technology. Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law, 21, 307–29.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Jan. 2014. Accused Patent Troll Takes Aim at FTC, Settles With N.Y. AG. The Litigation Daily, January. Available at www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202638423763?slreturn=20140023185327.Google Scholar

Wright, Joshua D. 2008. No Ovation for FTC’s Latest Enforcement Theory. Truth on the Market Blog, December. Available at http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/12/17/no-ovation-for-ftcs-latest-enforcement-theory/.Google Scholar

Ruosi, Ye et al. 2013. Determination of Whether Abuse of Dominance by SEP Owners Constitutes Monopoly: Comments on the Antitrust Lawsuit Huawei v. InterDigital. Digital Intellectual Property, 3.Google Scholar

Areeda, Phillip and Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1997. Antitrust Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar

Daniel, B. D. 2009. Walker Process Proof: The Proper Prescription. Rutgers Law Journal, 41, 105–61.Google Scholar

FTC staff Report. 2006. Ohlhausen, Maureen K. et al. 2006. Enforcement Perspectives on the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine: An FTC Staff Report.Google Scholar

Himes, Jay. 2009. When Caught with Your Hand in the Cookie Jar … Argue Standing. Rutgers Law Journal, 41, 187–228.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, Janis, Mark, Lemley, Mark, and Leslie, Christopher. 2014. IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law. 2nd. edn. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar

Leslie, Christopher. 2006. The Anticompetitive Effects of Unenforced Invalid Patents. Minnesota Law Review, 91, 101–83.Google Scholar

Leslie, Christopher. 2007. The Role of Consumers in Walker Process Litigation. Southwestern Journal of Law & Trade in the Americas, 13, 281–312.Google Scholar

Leslie, Christopher. 2008. Patents of Damocles. Industrial Law Journal, 83, 133–79.Google Scholar

Meyer, David and Thayamballi, Fabien. 2014. Do First Amendment Principles Limit the Antitrust Agencies’ Ability to Prohibit Enforcement of Standards-Essential Patents? Competition: Journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition law Section of the State Bar of California, 23, 142–55.Google Scholar

Steinman, David and Fitzpatrick, Danielle. 2002. Antitrust Counterclaims in Patent Infringement Cases: A Guide to Walker Process and Sham-Litigation Claims. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 10, 95–109.Google Scholar

Tokic, Stijepko. 2012. Enforcing the Duty of Disclosure After Therasense: Antitrust Implications. American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, 40, 221–65.Google Scholar

Acquisti, Alessandro. 2014. From the Economics of Privacy to the Economics of Big Data. In Bender, Stefan, Lane, Julia, Nissenbaum, Helen, and Stodden, Victoria (eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement. Cambridge University Press, 76–95.Google Scholar

Acquisti, Alessandro and Varian, Hal R.. 2005. Conditioning Prices on Purchase History. Marketing Science, 24(3), 367–81.Google Scholar

Acquisti, Alessandro, Taylor, Curtis, and Wagman, Liad. 2016. The Economics of Privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 442–92.Google Scholar

Averitt, Neil and Lande, Robert H.. 1997. Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law. Antitrust Law Journal, 65, 713–56.Google Scholar

Bennett, James and Lanning, Stan. 2007. “The Netflix Prize,” in Proceedings of KDD Cup and Workshop 2007 (San Jose, CA, August 12, 2007), 3–6.Google Scholar

Chiou, Lesley and Tucker, Catherine. 2014. Search Engines and Data Retention: Implications for Privacy and Antitrust. Working paper.Google Scholar

Cooper, James C. 2013. Privacy and Antitrust: Underpants Gnomes, the First Amendment, and Subjectivity. George Mason Law Review, 20(4), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Edlin, Aaron S. and Harris, Robert G.. 2013. The Role of Switching Costs in Antitrust Analysis: A Comparison of Microsoft and Google. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 15, 169–213.Google Scholar

Evans, David S. 2009. The Online Advertising Industry: Economics, Evolution, and Privacy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 37–60.Google Scholar

Evans, David S. and Richard, Schmalensee. 2014. The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Businesses. In Blair, Roger and Sokol, Daniel (eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Antitrust Economics. Volume 1. Oxford University Press, 404–50.Google Scholar

Executive Office of the President President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2014. Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective.Google Scholar

Feinstein, Debbie. 2015. The not-so-big news about Big Data, June 16, 2015, Competition Matters Blog. Available at www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/competition-matters/2015/06/not-so-big-news-about-big-data.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Avi. 2014. What Is Different about Online Advertising?, Review of Industrial Organization, 44(2), 115–29.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Avi and Tucker, Catherine. 2010. Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising, Management Science, 57(1), 57–71.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Avi and Tucker, Catherine. 2011. Online Advertising. In Zelkowitz, Marvin V. (ed.), The Internet and Mobile Technology Advances in Computing . Maryland Heights, MO: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Avi and Tucker, Catherine. 2012. Privacy and Innovation. In Lerner, Josh and Stern, Scott (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy. University of Chicago Press, 65–90.Google Scholar

Graef, Inge. 2015. Market Definition and Market Power in Data: The Case of Online Platforms. World Competition, 38(4), 473–505.Google Scholar

Jones Harbour, Pamela and Koslov, Tara Isa. 2010. Section 2 in a Web 2.0 World: An Expanded Vision of Relevant Product Markets. Antitrust Law Journal, 76, 769–97.Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Anja and Catherine, Tucker. 2015. Can Big Data Protect a Firm from Competition? Working paper.Google Scholar

Lerner, Andres V. 2014. The Role of ‘Big Data’ in Online Platform Competition. Working paper.Google Scholar

Muris, Timothy J. and Zepeda, Paloma. 2012. The Benefits, and Potential Costs, of FTC-Style Regulation in Protecting Consumers. Competition Law International, 8, 11–17.Google Scholar

Newman, Nathan. 2014. Search, Antitrust and the Economics of the Control of User Data. Yale Journal on Regulation, 31: 401–52.Google Scholar

OECD. 2013. Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital, Growth and Innovation.Google Scholar

Ohlhausen, Maureen K. and Okuliar, Alexander P.. 2015. Competition, Consumer Protection, and the Right [Approach] to Privacy. Antitrust Law Journal, 80, 121–56.Google Scholar

Orbach, Barak and Avraham, Raphael. 2014. Squeezing Claims: Refusals to Deal, Essentials Facilities, and Price Squeezes. In Blair, Roger and Sokol, Daniel (eds.), Oxford Handbook on International Antitrust Economics, Volume 2, Oxford University Press, 120–31.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Edith. 2015. Protecting Privacy in the Era of Big Data, Remarks of FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez, International Conference on Big Data from a Privacy Perspective, Hong Kong, June 10.Google Scholar

Rochet, Jean Charles and Tirole, Jean. 2002. Cooperation among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations. RAND Journal of Economics, 33, 1–22.Google Scholar

Salinger, Michael A. and Levinson, Robert J.. 2015. Economics and the FTC’s Google Investigation. Review of Industrial Organization, 46: 25–57.Google Scholar

Savage, Scott J. and Waldman, Donald M.. 2015. Privacy Tradeoffs in Smartphone Applications. Economics Letters, 137, 171–5.Google Scholar

Schepp, Nils-Peter and Wambach, Achim. 2015. On Big Data and Its Relevance for Market Power Assessment., Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 7(2) 120–4.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Carl and Varian, Hal R.. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar

Stucke, Maurice E. and Ezrachi, Ariel. 2015. When Competition Fails to Optimise Quality: A Look at Search Engines. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 18, 70–110.Google Scholar

Stucke, Maurice and Grunes, Allen. 2015a. Debunking the Myths over Big Data and Antitrust. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, May.Google Scholar

Stucke, Maurice and Grunes, Allen. 2015b. No Mistake about It: The Important Role of Antitrust in the Era of Big Data. Antitrust Source.Google Scholar

Tucker, Catherine. 2013. The Implications of Improved Attribution and Measurability for Antitrust and Privacy in Online Advertising Markets. George Mason Law Review, 20, 1015–54.Google Scholar

Tucker, Darren and Welford, Hill. 2014. Big Mistakes Regarding Big Data. Antitrust Source.Google Scholar

Varian, Hal R. 2014. Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28.Google Scholar