Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:22:02.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Caucasus

from Part II - Case Studies for Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, Robert M. W., 2001. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alekseev, Mikhail E., 1994a. Budukh. In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 259296.Google Scholar
Alekseev, Mikhail E., 1994b. Rutul. In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 213258.Google Scholar
Alekseev, Mikhail E., Klimov, Georgij A., Starostin, Sergei A. and Testelets, Yakov G. (eds), 1999. Jazyki Mira: Kavkazskie Jazyki [Languages of the World: Caucasian Languages]. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Alekseev, Mikhail E. and Radjabov, Ramazan, 2004. Tsez. In Job, (ed.), pp. 115163.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory, 1997. Lak phonology. In Kaye, and Daniels, (eds), pp. 973997.Google Scholar
Authier, Gilles, 2012. Grammaire juhuri, ou judeo-tat, langue iranienne des Juifs du Caucase de l’est. Beiträge zur Iranistik, vol. 36. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Babel, Molly E., 2009. Phonetic and Social Selectivity in Speech Accommodation. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Balanovsky, Oleg, et al. and The Genographic Consortium, 2011. Parallel evolution of genes and languages in the Caucasus region. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28 (10): 29052920.Google Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan Ignacy Niecisław, 1963. Izbrannyye trudy po obshchemu yazykoznaniyu [Selected Works on General Linguistics], vol. 2. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Helma, 1995. A Grammar of Hunzib. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Helma, 2005. The East Caucasian language family. Lingua 115 (1): 147190.Google Scholar
Berta, Árpád, 1998. West Kipchak languages. In Johanson, and Csató, (eds), pp. 301317.Google Scholar
Bickel, Baltasar, 2008. A general method for the statistical evaluation of typological distributions. Manuscript, University of Leipzig. www.uni-leipzig.de/~bickel/research/projects/publ.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter, 2004. Dialectology and typology: An integrative perspective. In Kortmann, Bernd (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 1146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bläsing, Uwe, 2003. Kalmuck. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic Languages, pp. 229247. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette, 2006. A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32 (2): 117166.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette and Wedel, Andrew, 2009. Inhibited sound change: An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica 26 (2): 143183.Google Scholar
Boeder, Winfried, 2005. The South Caucasian languages. Lingua 115 (1): 589.Google Scholar
Brown, Cecil, Holman, Eric and Wichmann, Søren, 2013. Sound correspondences in the world’s languages. Language 89 (1): 429.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, 2003. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14 (3): 261290.Google Scholar
Catford, John C., 1977. Mountain of tongues: The languages of the Caucasus. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6: 283314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, John C., 1983. Pharyngeal and laryngeal sounds in Caucasian languages. In Bless, Diane and Abbs, James (eds), Vocal Fold Physiology: Contemporary Research and Clinical Issues, pp. 344350. San Diego: College-Hill.Google Scholar
Catford, John C., 1992. Caucasian phonetics and general phonetics. In Paris, Catherine (ed.), Caucasologie et mythologie comparée: Actes du Colloque International CNRS IVe Colloque de Caucasologie, pp. 193216, Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Catford, John C., 1994. Vowel systems of Caucasian languages. In Aronson, Howard Isaac (ed.), Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR: Papers from the Fourth Conference, pp. 4460. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
C’ereteli, Grigol, 1976. K voprosu o klassifikacii novoaramejskix dialektov [On the question of classification of Neo-Aramaic dialects]. In Philologia Orientalis, vol. IV, Tbilisi: Mecniereba, pp. 224232.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav, 2008a. The problem of the Caucasian Sprachbund. In Muysken, Pieter (ed.), From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics, pp. 2593. Studies in Language Companion Series, vol. 25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav, 2008b. Armenians and their dialects in Abkhazia. In Lubotsky, Alexander, Schaeken, Jos and Wiedenhof, Jeroen (eds), Balto-Slavic and Indo-European Linguistics, pp. 5167. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana, 2002. Georgian harmonic clusters: Phonetic cues to phonological representation. Phonology 15 (2): 121141.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong and Ladefoged, Peter, 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27 (2): 207229.Google Scholar
Coene, Frederik, 2009. The Caucasus: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colarusso, John, 1988. The Northwest Caucasian Languages: A Phonological Survey. New York and London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard (ed.), 1981. The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, 2003. A note on pharyngealization and umlaut in two Tsezic languages. In Boeder, Winfried (ed.), Kaukasische Sprachprobleme: Beiträge zu den Kaukasistentagungen in Oldenburg 1995–2001, pp. 105109. Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, 2008. Linguistic diversity in the Caucasus. Annual Review of Anthropology 37 (1): 131143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard and Khalilov, Madzhid, 2010. The Dictionary of Languages and Dialects of the Peoples of the Northern Caucasus: Comparison of the Basic Lexicon; Languages and Dialects of the Peoples of Republic of Daghestan, Ingush Republic, Republic of North Ossetia-Alania, Chechen Republic and of the Nakh-Daghestanian Peoples of Azerbaijan and Georgia. Makhachkala, and Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Daniel, Mikhail, Dobrushina, Nina and Knyazev, Sergey, 2011. Highlanders’ Russian: Case study in bilingualism and language interference in central Daghestan. In Mustajoki, Arto, Protassova, Ekaterina and Vakhtin, Nikolai (eds), Instrumentarium of Linguistics: Sociolinguistic Approach to Non-Standard Russian, pp. 6593. Slavica Helsingiensia, vol. 40. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Dirr, Adolf, 1928. Einführung in das Studium der kaukasischen Sprachen: mit einer Sprachenkarte. Leipzig: Asia Major.Google Scholar
Dobrushina, Nina, 2013. How to study multilingualism of the past: Investigating traditional contact situations in Daghestan. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (3): 376393.Google Scholar
Dzhidalaev, Nurislam S., 2010. Tjurksko-dagestanskie jazykovye kontakty (na primere lakskogo jazyka) [Turkic-Dagestanian language contacts (on the example of Lak)]. Makhachkala: Russian Academy of Science in Dagestan.Google Scholar
Fallon, Paul D., 2001. The Synchronic and Diachronic Phonology of Ejectives. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Schirru, Carlo and MacKay, Ian R. A., 2003. Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40: 467491.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. and Port, Robert, 1981. Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24: 125146.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana, 2013. A Grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A., 2009. Sociolinguistics in the Caucasus. In Ball, Martin J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics Around the World, pp. 127138. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilles, Peter and Siebenhaar, Beat, 2010. Areal variation in segmental phonetics and phonology. In Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds), Language and Space, pp. 760786. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost, 2008. Endangered Caucasian languages in Georgia: Linguistic parameters of language endangerment. In Harrison, K. David, Rood, David S. and Dwyer, Arienne (eds), Lessons from Documented Endangered Languages, pp. 159193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew and Applebaum, Ayla, 2006. Turkish Kabardian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36 (2): 255264.Google Scholar
Grawunder, Sven, 2013. Intensity slopes as robust measure for distinguishing glottalic vs pulmonic stop initiation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (5): 4069.Google Scholar
Grawunder, Sven, 2015. Foneticheskie kharakteristiki (nenazalizovannykh) glaznykh v bezhtinskom yazyke [Phonetic characteristics of (non-nasalized) vowels in Bezhta]. In Comrie, Bernard (ed.), Grammatika bezhtinskogo yazyka [A Grammar of Bezhta], pp. 5262. Leipzig and Makhachkala: ALEPH.Google Scholar
Grawunder, Sven, Simpson, Adrian P. and Khalilov, Madzhid S., 2010. Phonetic characteristics of ejectives: Samples from Caucasian languages. In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine and Żygis, Marzena (eds), Turbulent Sounds: An Interdisciplinary Guide, pp. 209244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gudava, Togo E., 1964. Konsonantizm andijxskix yazykov [The Consonantism of the Andic Languages]. Tbilisi: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoj SSR.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C., 1991. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. I: The Kartvelian Languages. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42 (1): 2570.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. George, 1981. Caucasian languages. In Comrie, (ed.), pp. 196237.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. George, 1989. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 2: The North West Caucasian Languages. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. George, 2004. Introduction to the Study of the Languages of the Caucasus. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. George, 2005. North West Caucasian. Lingua 115 (1): 91145.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2012a Areal features of the Anglophone world. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 119. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2012b. Internally and externally motivated language change. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, pp. 387407. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Höhlig, Monika, 1997. Kontaktbedingter Sprachwandel in der adygeischen Umgangssprache im Kaukasus und in der Türkei: Vergleichende Analyse des russischen und türkischen Einflusses in mündlichen adygeischen Texten. LINCOM Studies in Caucasian Linguistics, vol. 3. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann, 1991. Laz. In Harris, (ed.), pp. 395472.Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann and Gagua, Rasudan, 1994. Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 147212.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31 (2): 213238.Google Scholar
Isakov, Isak Abdulvakhidovich and Khalilov, Madzhid S., 2004. Hinukh. In Job, (ed.), pp. 167214.Google Scholar
Isakov, Isak Abdulvakhidovich and Khalilov, Madzhid S., 2012. Gunzibskij jazyk (Fonetika Morfologija. Slovoobrazovanie. Leksika. Teksty) [The Hunzib Language]. Makhachkala: Russian Academy of the Sciences.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Otto, 1977. Zur Phonologie des Kurdischen in der Türkei. Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, 3: 84106.Google Scholar
Job, Michael (ed.), 2004. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 3: The North East Caucasian Languages, part 1. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars, 2006. On the roles of Turkic in the Caucasus area. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas, pp. 160181. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars and Csató, Éva (eds), 1998. The Turkic Languages. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. and Daniels, Peter T. (eds), 1997. Phonologies of Asia and Africa (including the Caucasus), vol. 1. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Keskin, Mesut, 2008. Zur dialektalen Gliederung des Zazaki. Unpublished MA thesis, Johann-Wolfgang-von-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Institut für Vergleichende indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Khalidova, Rasidat Sachrudinovna, 2006. Avarsko-andijskie jazykovye kontakty [Avar-Andic Language Contacts]. Makhachkala: Russian Academy of the Sciences.Google Scholar
Khalilov, Madzhid Sharipovic, 2004. Gruzinsko-dagestanskie jazykovye kontakty [Georgian–Dagestanian Language Contacts]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Khalilova, Zaira, 2009. A Grammar of Kwarshi. PhD thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey, 2008. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Barwar. Handbook of Oriental Studies, Section 1: The Near and Middle East, vol. 96. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexander E., 2001. Bagvalinskij jazyk: Grammatika, teksty, slovari [The Bagvalal Language: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary]. Moscow: Russian Academy of the Sciences.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexander E. and Kodzasov, Sandro V., 1990. Sopostavitel’noe izucenie dagestanskix jazykov: Imja, Fonetika [A Comparative Study of Dagestanian Languages: Nouns, Phonetics]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universitet.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexander E. and Testelec, Yakuv G. (eds), 1999. Elementy tsakhurskogo yazyka v tipologicheskom osveshchenii [Elements of the Tsakhur Language in a typological light]. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Kingston, John and Nichols, Johanna, 1986. Pharyngealization in Chechen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80: 62.Google Scholar
Klimov, Georgij A., 1994. Einführung in die kaukasische Sprachwissenschaft, translated and revised by Gippert, Jost. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Kodzasov, Sandro V., 1999. Caucasian: Daghestanian languages. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 9951020. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin, 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koryakov, Yuri B., 2006. Atlas kavkazkikh yazykov [Atlas of the Caucasian Languages]. Moscow: RAN.Google Scholar
Lacroix, René, 2009. Description du Dialecte Laze d’Arhavi (Caucasique du Sud, Turquie): Grammaire et Textes. PhD thesis, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert, 2014. Simultaneous Structure in Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian, 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lancia, Leonardo and Grawunder, Sven, 2014. Tongue–larynx interactions in the production of word initial laryngealization over different prosodic contexts: a repeated speech experiment. In Fuchs, Susanne et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP), Cologne, pp. 245248.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, William and Marchal, Alain (eds), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, pp. 403439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh and Abramson, Arthur, 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20 (3): 384422.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary and Dale, Rick, 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5 (1): e8559.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian, 1984. Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian, Rajabov, Ramasan and Sonnenschein, Aaron, 1996. The main features of Tsez phonetics. UCLA Working Papers In Phonetics: 94110.Google Scholar
Magomedova, Patimat, 2004. Chamalal. In Job, (ed.), pp. 565.Google Scholar
McMahon, April M. S., 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mejlanova, Udeizat A., 1970. Gjunejskij dialekt: osnova lezginskogo literaturnogo jazyka [The Gunei Dialect: Basis of the Lezgian Literary Language]. Makhachkala: Inst. Istorii, Yazyka i Literatury im. G Cadasy.Google Scholar
Nasidze, Ivan et al., 2004. Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome variation in the Caucasus. Annals of Human Genetics 68 (3): 205221.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1994. Chechen. In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 178.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1997. Chechen phonology. In Kaye, and Daniels, (eds), pp. 941971.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 2011. Ingush Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 2013. The vertical archipelago: Adding the third dimension to linguistic geography. In Auer, Peter, Hilpert, Martin, Stukenbrock, Anja and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (eds), Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives, pp. 3860. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J., 1990. There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: A personal view. Journal of Phonetics, 18: 153171.Google Scholar
Rogava, Georgij Vissarionovic and Kerasheva, Zajnab Ibragimovna, 1966. Adygabzem igrammatik – Grammatika adygejskogo jazyka [Grammar of the Adyghe Language]. Maykop, Krasnodar: Krasnodarske Thylq Tedzapi [Krasnodar Publishing House].Google Scholar
Schönig, Claus, 1998. Azerbaijanian. In Johanson, and Csató, (eds), pp. 248260.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang, 2005. Towards a history of Udi. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics, 1: 5591.Google Scholar
Schulze-Fürhoff, Wolfgang, 1994. Udi. In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 447514.Google Scholar
Smeets, Rieks (ed.), 1994. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 4: North East Caucasian Languages, part 2. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald L., 1994. Phonological systems in contact in Iran and Transcaucasia. In Marashi, Mehdi (ed.), Persian Studies in North America: Studies in Honor of Mohammad Ali Jazayery, pp. 7594. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald L., 2004. Iranian as buffer zone between the universal typologies of Turkic and Semitic. In Csató, Éva Ágnes, Isaksson, Bo and Jahani, Carina (eds), Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion: Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic, pp. 3563. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald L., 2006. Circumpositions as an areal response: The case study of the Iranian zone. In Johanson, Lars and Bulut, Christiane (eds), Turkic–Iranian Contact-Areas, pp. 310333. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina R. and Mutalov, Rasul O., 2003. A Grammar of Icari Dargwa. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Talibov, Bukar B., 2004. Tsakhur. In Job, (ed.), pp. 347419.Google Scholar
Testen, David, 1997. Ossetic phonology. In Kaye, and Daniels, (eds), pp. 707731.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tolstoj, Nikita I., 1997. Tyurkskie Yazyki [Turkic Languages]. Yazyki Mira, Moscow: Indrik, RAN.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai Sergeevich, 1958 [1939]. Grundzüge der Phonologie, seventh edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 1996. Dialect typology: Isolation, social network and phonological structure. In Guy, Gregory R., Feagin, Crawford, Schiffrin, Deborah and Baugh, John (eds), Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honour of William Labov, vol. 1, pp. 321. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 2004. Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology 8 (3): 305320.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuite, Kevin, 1999. The myth of the Caucasian Sprachbund: The case of ergativity. Lingua 108 (1): 129.Google Scholar
Tuite, Kevin, 2008. The rise and fall and revival of the Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis. Historiographia Linguistica 35 (1–2): 2382.Google Scholar
Vadzhibov, Malik, 2012. Fonetika tabasaranskogo jazyka – sravitel’noe opisanie zvukovykh sistem literaturnogo jazyka i mezhgiul’skogo govora [Phonetics of the Tabasaran Language]. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert, 1998. The Phonology of Armenian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vicenik, Chad, 2010. An acoustic study of Georgian stop consonants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40 (1): 5992.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha, 1996. Acoustic characteristics of ejectives in Ingush. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 96, 3, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wixman, Ronald, 1980. Language Aspects of Ethnic Patterns and Processes in the North Caucasus. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
Yunusbayev, Bayazit, et al., 2012. The Caucasus as an asymmetric semipermeable barrier to ancient human migrations. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29 (1): 359365.Google Scholar
Zabitov, S. M. and Efendiev, I. I., 2001. Slovar’ arabskikh i persidskikh leksicheskikh zaimstvovanij v lezginskom jazyke [Dictionary of Arab and Persian Lexical Loans in the Lezgian Language]. Makhachkala: Dagestan State University.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Caucasus
  • Edited by Raymond Hickey, Universität Duisburg–Essen
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics
  • Online publication: 11 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Caucasus
  • Edited by Raymond Hickey, Universität Duisburg–Essen
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics
  • Online publication: 11 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Caucasus
  • Edited by Raymond Hickey, Universität Duisburg–Essen
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics
  • Online publication: 11 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.014
Available formats
×